Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255402: fixed in rlpr 2.05-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > Package: pdns
> > Version: 2.9.17-13sarge1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 6.5.4
> >
> > Both pdns-doc_2.9.17-13sarge1_all.deb and pdns_2.9.17-13sarge1_all.deb
> > contain /usr/share/doc-base/pdns. This prevents whic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
tags +patch
thanks
Attached is a simple patch against 1.01b-12.1 to fix this problem -
including stdlib.h in mmv.c fixes the crash on amd64. A bunch of
warnings like these were getting printed during compile, but were going
ignored:
mmv.c:540: w
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320535: fixed in ipsec-tools 1:0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: libembperl-perl
Version: 2.0rc3-1
Severity: serious
libembperl-perl fails to build because it cannot find apr.h:
> cc -c -I/tmp/buildd/libembperl-perl-2.0rc3 -I/usr/include/apache2
> -I/usr/lib/apache2/modules/regex -I/usr/lib/apache2/modules/os/unix
> -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/in
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:56:50 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322639: FTBFS: Cannot find pow() in libm
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: byacc
Version: 20050505-1
Severity: serious
groff fails to build from source because byacc generates an incomplete
declaration of YYSTYPE in the header file. The first attachement
contains the header file it generates. The second attachment contains
a patch that fixes this problem.
Thi
Package: libggi
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
libggi fails to build because it build-depends on aalib1-dev, which
has been renamed libaa1-dev:
> -> Considering aalib1-dev
>-> Trying aalib1-dev
>-> Cannot install aalib1-dev; apt errors follow:
> Reading package lists
Package: libggimisc
Version: 2.0.2-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
libggimisc fails to build because it contains invalid lvalues in two
assignments:
> source='init.c' object='init.lo' libtool=yes \
> depfile='.deps/init.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/init.TPlo' \
> depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../../depcomp \
Package: libg++27
Version: 2.7.2.1-19
Severity: serious
libg++27 fails to build because it uses dpkg's obsolete
--print-gnu-build-architecture option:
> debian/rules build
> dpkg: unknown option --print-gnu-build-architecture
>
> Type dpkg --help for help about installing and deinstalling packa
Package: libdbi-drivers
Version: 0.7.1-3.0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
libdbi-drivers fails to build because it does not look in the right
place for the PostgreSQL include files:
> checking for PostgreSQL support... no
> configure: error: Invalid PostgreSQL directory - include files not found
Package: libgda2
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: serious
libgda2 fails to build because it uses some undeclared types, which
causes syntax errors:
> if /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"GNU\
> Data\ Access\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"libgda\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"1.2.1\"
> -
> I would have thought that old (r11) would have just been copied to
> r26. Could you send preprocessed source and compilation details?
This is now filed as http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23369
I have reassigned the fakeroot bug to gcc-4.0 and marked it up accordingly.
randolph
--
At Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:50:25 +0200,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> After upgrading from the sarge libc6, sshd on my computer no longer
> accepted connections.
>
> Restarting sshd fixed the problem.
>
> It seems the "restart services" question in the postinst should be
> asked for upgrades from < 2.3.5 .
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 321785 gcc-4.0
Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]
Bug reassigned from package `fakeroot' to `gcc-4.0'.
> retitle 321785 [PR 23369] hppa: Generates wrong code for fptr comparison
Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]
Changed Bug titl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 321608 - patch
Bug#321608: safecat: relocation error
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321547: fixed in partimage 0.6.4-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321557: fixed in partimage 0.6.4-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 292951 important
Bug#292951: not detecting cdrom on iMac G5
Bug#299745: Drivers for newer G5 PowerMacs missing
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 292951 - sarge-ignore
Bug#292951: not detecting cdrom on iMac G5
Tags were: sarge-ignore
Bug#299
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322691 serious
Bug#322691: Please force libgmp3c2 to be installed on upgrade from
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
severity 322773 important
thanks
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:49:50PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> Anyway, the sparc binaries are broken, as announced in the build log:
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libstdc++.so.5, needed by /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so, ma
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:23:12PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> severity 292951 serious
> thanks
>
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Joel Van Velden wrote:
> > Debian Installer (nightly version 20050128 netinst.iso) does not succeed in
> > loading the cdrom drive so it cannot proceed further with the install
Damn... I _had_ uploaded libnet-imap-simple-perl at some point! (at
least, I thought so - I even set the tag on the SVN tree)
Anyway, the module _does_ require Net::IMAP::Simple to be used (it
just extends it by providing an SSL layer), so I will first upload
it.
Thanks for your bug, anyway.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322773 important
Bug#322773: Links against libstc++.so.6 and old qt
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286483: fixed in jabber-aim 20040131b-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321093: fixed in mpich 1.2.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317467: fixed in mpich 1.2.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317467: fixed in mpich 1.2.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321052: fixed in mpich 1.2.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321093: fixed in mpich 1.2.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320995: fixed in audacity 1.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285481: fixed in audacity 1.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 07:53:01PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Let me see if I understand this right. Is this a bug that happens only when a
> user uploads two or more files in the same request? Or is it after the first
> upload an Apache child sees? (The former doesn't really seem like an
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:49:50PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: djview
> Severity: serious
> I just looked through the whole mess with djvulibre and noticed that
> it was only built on two official archs (i386, uploaded by the
> maintainer, and sparc). m68k fails due to a toolch
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 06:53:24AM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > When are you planning that to be? wxwindows2.4 is fully transitioned
> > now (except for arm, which is arch-specific breakage you probably want
> > to ignore), so it would be great if these two bugs could ge
For your immediate review:
Good Day, your file has been reviewed and there now are a few potential options
for you to consider.
Please note that this issue is time sensitive and that your previous credit
situation is not of concern.
Confirm your details on our secure form to ensure the data
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:32:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322365: fixed in libnasl 2.2.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hello,
Just wondering if/when firebird will likely be rebuilt for the gcc4
transition. This is required before we reenable support in Qt.
Thanks for any info,
Christopher Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: widelands
Severity: critical
Version: build9-6
Hello,
I just tried to transition this package to gcc4, and it failed to build. So,
I open this bug to prevent other to give it a try.
That's something I need to sort out with upstream (I'm widelands
maintainer), and I'm hoping it may be fi
Looks fine to me... I will be sure to include it and #322690 into
the 2.0.8 packaging I've been currently working on. Can you please
forward details on how/why regarding the renaming for my information as
I'm obviously behind on the info relating to the ABI changes.
Regards,
Jeremy
S
Hi,
Could you please show me the build log of the capi4hylafax on armd64?
I want to see if it was recognised as 64bit arch or not.
Thanks,
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, do you have DDI enabled? In this case, is a correct DDIOffset
set in the config file?
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: djview
Severity: serious
Hi,
I just looked through the whole mess with djvulibre and noticed that
it was only built on two official archs (i386, uploaded by the
maintainer, and sparc). m68k fails due to a toolchain bug, hppa due to
the broken fakeroot on the buildds and the other fail be
Could you please try reproducing this FTBFS of capi4hylafax again with
capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-13 and libcapi20-dev 1:3.7.2005-07-09-1.1 ?
I'm not sure why it was looking for /usr/lib/libcapi20, but it might
be a side-effect of #318808.
Thanks.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:43:42AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:09:10AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > 1) ocaml-md5sums may be not available when postrm scripts are invoked
> > Sure, you should use it in prerm, since postrm removes it, no ?
>
> No, I can't, since
On Friday 12 August 2005 09:23, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This issue is still present with the current version of g++ in unstable and
> testing (I wouldn't have expected it to go away). It also is no longer
> blocked by the C++ transition, as fltk1.1 is now available on all
> architectures with the
Package: lvm2
Followup-For: Bug #315339
Nice to see the initial bug (of 2.01.12-1) being addressed so quickly.
However, using 2.01.12-2 gives me similar problems, while using lvm2
metadata. All vgdisplay commands complain about "Incorrect metadata area
header checksum" and trying to modify the LV
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-3
Severity: critical
After upgrading from the sarge libc6, sshd on my computer no longer
accepted connections.
Restarting sshd fixed the problem.
It seems the "restart services" question in the postinst should be
asked for upgrades from < 2.3.5 .
I've set the seve
Hi.
During my NM process, I prepared a NMU for the bugs mentioned in the
subject and CC'ed. I didn't upload it (or rather: ask for upload by a
sponsor) yet, but the packages I prepared are publicly available at
http://mail.incase.de/NMUs/
I will wait a week or so and then ask for upload by a spon
tags 304604 - experimental
severity 304604 serious
reassign 322746 perl
merge 322746 304604
thanks
This bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322746
didn't get reassigned:
tags 304604 - experimental
severity 304604 serious
reassing 322746 perl
merge 322746 304604
th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 304604 - experimental
Bug#304604: perl: heap corruption causes installation of other packages to fail
(debconf is aborting) with new glibc
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: experimental
> severity 304604 serious
Bug#304604: perl: heap corrupt
Bernd Feige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Jay,
>
>> Have you reported any bugs against gcc on this?
>
> No, I thought it should be first verified and upstream notified
> about the problem; maybe they know of any specialties in their code
> that may trigger it. Then, a smaller test case should
> The handling of function pointers in 4.0 branch was broken prior to
> this change:
>
> 2005-07-02 Jeff Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * tree-ssa-dom.c (find_equivalent_equality_comparison): Do not
> a eliminate type conversion which feeds an equality comparison
> if the origin
> #1 0x406d7424 in __pthread_sigaction (sig=18, act=0xc0241ec8,
> oact=0xc0241f50)
> at signals.c:106
> 106 if (old == SIG_IGN || old == SIG_DFL || old == SIG_ERR)
> (gdb) print &old
> Address requested for identifier "old" which is in register $r11
> (gdb) print /x $r11
> $6 =
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 321974 + pending
Bug#321974: upgrade forces pdns-server to use pipe backend
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 06:20:14PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Do you know if this problem affect sarge as well as sid?
I don't know for a fact, but assuming that this problem came with PHP
4.4, it wouldn't affect sarge, which has PHP 4.3.10.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> severity 321974 serious
Bug#321974: upgrade forces pdns-server to use pipe backend
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 322352 + unreproducible
Bug#322352: pdns and pdns-doc both contain /usr/share/doc-base/pdns (sarge
security update version)
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303847: fixed in 3ddesktop 0.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello
Thanks a lot for the patch.
Do you know if this problem affect sarge as well as sid?
Regards,
// Ola
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:05:13PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Herewith attached patch seems to solve the problem, after some quick
> testing. I tested only IMP3 and only the basic
Hi.
As said, I created a NMU for this bug (not really uploaded into the
archive though). The files of the NMU are available at
http://mail.incase.de/NMUs/
I first created this NMU with my own patch, but given that it is cleaner
than mine, I converted it to use the patch given in this bugreport.
r
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319120: fixed in 3ddesktop 0.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 304604 - experimental
severity 304604 serious
reassing 322746 perl
merge 322746 304604
thanks
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:24:10PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> # dpkg --configure -a
> Setting up locales (2.3.5-3) ...
> Generating locales (this might take a while)...
> [...]
> Generation com
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 304604 - experimental
Bug#304604: perl: heap corruption causes installation of other packages to fail
(debconf is aborting) with new glibc
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental
> severity 304604 serious
Bug#304604: perl: heap corrupt
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318681: fixed in gcl 2.6.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322579: fixed in boost 1.33.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146326: fixed in gnomesword 2.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Dear Jay,
> Have you reported any bugs against gcc on this?
No, I thought it should be first verified and upstream notified about the
problem;
maybe they know of any specialties in their code that may trigger it. Then, a
smaller
test case should probably be produced for the gcc maintainers...
On 2005-08-12 16:08:07 +0200, Martin Schroeder wrote:
> I don't know about 2005-2097, but the worst would be a crash of
> pdfTeX. Is a patch around?
I've found it and checked the code: The vulnerable code
(fofi/FoFiTrueType.cc) is only called from the interactive code
(xpdf/PShOutputDev.cc and xpd
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146326: fixed in gnomesword 2.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-3
Severity: serious
# dpkg --configure -a
Setting up locales (2.3.5-3) ...
Generating locales (this might take a while)...
[...]
Generation complete.
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x0873f7f0 ***
dpkg: error processing locales (--configure):
# See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=313334;msg=12
# doko made a typo in June and has not yet noticed it -- meanwhile
# twisted 2.0 has not progressed to testing, because of this.
package twisted-doc-api
severity 313334 normal
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=313334;msg=12
> # doko made a typo in June and has not yet noticed it -- meanwhile
> # twisted 2.0 has not progressed to testing, because of this.
> package twisted-doc-api
Ignoring bugs not assigne
Bernd Feige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the current package crashes whenever an image or workspace is loaded.
> I downloaded the current CVS version of vips and nip2 (nip2-7.11.1)
> and verified the problem there (gcc 4.0.2 20050806); it occurs in
> led.c:107, within gdk_pixmap_create_from_xpm_d
(I trimmed the cc list a bit)
Dave,
Could this actually be a gcc problem?
Take a look at this:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x406dbd20 in __canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare ()
from /usr/lib/debug/libpthread.so.0
#1 0x406d7424 in __pthread_sigaction (sig=18, act=0xc0241ec8,
oact=0xc0241f50)
at signal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess wrote:
> This RC bug has the effect of blocking the security fix in the new
> version in unstable from reaching testing. I think that's remote
> security holes are generally considered more invonvenient than
> functionlity decreases, so I sug
Herewith attached patch seems to solve the problem, after some quick
testing. I tested only IMP3 and only the basic functionalities.
--
Lionel
--- /usr/share/horde2/lib/Cipher/BlockMode.php.deb 2005-08-12
16:51:22.358659640 +0200
+++ /usr/share/horde2/lib/Cipher/BlockMode.php 2005-08-12 16
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320325 normal
Bug#320325: tdiary: [dummy] Wait for the next release.
Severity set to `normal'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
On 2005-08-12 13:36:32 +0200, Thomas Esser wrote:
> > Now I'm wondering which changes you have made to the upstream sources,
> > and whether they were on purpose; and whether this makes teTeX
> > non-vulnerable, or requires a different patch to fix the vulnerability.
>
> For the reasons given abov
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:18:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.9.121-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308879: fixed in tinyca 0.7.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:18:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.9.121-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 07:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321310: fixed in f-spot 0.0.13-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
I just upgraded apache and PHP4 and hit this problem. So it definitely
looks like an incompatibility with newer PHP.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I noticed two build failures of my NMU -2.1 upload. I prepared a -2.2
package that fixes those remaining issues.
I try to upload that this evening (meaning german time :).
Here is the changelog:
python-crypto (2.0+dp1-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
* NMU to fix build failures on some architect
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:19:04PM -0400, Kevin Dwyer wrote:
>
> I've been too busy to look at this yet. Any help would be appreciated.
>
> I'll see if I can solicit a patch from some of the other periodic
> developers.
There is now some working code in the sourceforge CVS. Please test if
you
Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:18:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.9.121-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
reassign 315923 grub-installer
stop
seems the wrong menu.lst got written to disk.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 309964 linux-2.6
Bug#309964: "drive appears confused (ireason = 0x01)" and linux hangs
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.11-9-em64t-p4-smp' to `linux-2.6'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 317386 important
Bug#317386: Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 315923 grub-installer
Bug#315923: Kernel panic after Sarge installation on Dell with SATA drive
Bug reassigned from package `install' to `grub-installer'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Hi,
Am Freitag, 12. August 2005 11:29 schrieb Steffen Moeller:
> I have no [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/openoffice2/program/soffice &
> [1] 11207
ugh. don't do that. Use ooffice2, oowriter2 or whatever
> I have no [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/openoffice2/program/javaldx: error
> while load
Package: dhcp-client-udeb
Version: 2.0pl5-19.1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Installations for 1386 using current daily builds (using 2.6.12) are
failing with a screen saying "no default route could be set".
The cause for this is that in /etc/dhclient the 'ip route add' command is
failing. It retu
any update on the matter? had you another crash?
is your hadware stable, any particular problems?
i must confess to have seen a similar crash on one
of our university machines. it was running 2.4.25
and this bug happened once. machine shouldn't have
been under mem pressure, but had a quite long up
Steve Langasek wrote:
> When are you planning that to be? wxwindows2.4 is fully transitioned
> now (except for arm, which is arch-specific breakage you probably want
> to ignore), so it would be great if these two bugs could get fixed.
> I'm happy to do a quick NMU of audacity 1.2.3 if you prefer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 206362 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#206362: openoffice.org: word-completion with "tab" key
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 316030 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#316030: SystemError: dynamic module not initalized correctk
Package: ocaml-nox
Version: 3.08.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Hi,
ocamlc and ocamlopt need at least gcc and ld to work correctly (there
are also references to nm and objcopy), but the package doesn't declare
this dependency. This missing dependency has of course not been
detec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> close 319642
Bug#319642: anjuta: experimental version doesn't depend on experimental
anjuta-common
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322702 serious
Bug#322702: openoffice.org2-writer: Missing dependency to libstlport
Severity set to `serious'.
> reassign 322702 openoffice.org2
Bug#322702: openoffice.org2-writer: Missing dependency to libstlport
Bug reassigned from package `
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
> Ghemical is missing dependency on lapack3 and refblas3:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ldd /usr/bin/ghemical
> [...]
> liblapack.so.3 => not found
> libblas.so.3 => not found
> [...]
>
> "apt-get install lapack3 refbla
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
