Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's very old, seems to have no upstream development anymore, has
not many users and there are some alternatives.
The package zone-file-check is obsolete, it has been superseded by
the utility named-checkzone that is included in the bind9
Package: ncompress
Version: 4.2.4-15
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi!
There is a recent report about insecure temporary files in ncompress,
similar to the recent advisories about gzip:
http://www.zataz.net/adviso/ncompress-09052005.txt
Can you please check this? There is no CAN number yet.
Package: arc
Version: 5.21l-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi!
There is a recent report about insecure temporary files in ncompress,
similar to the recent advisories about gzip:
http://www.zataz.net/adviso/arc-09052005.txt
Can you please check this? There is no CAN number yet. If this is a
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:44:28 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in last upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:32:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328205: fixed in octave-gpc 0.1.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:47:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328202: fixed in semidef-oct 1:2003-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:47:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328936: fixed in libhtml-prototype-perl 1.35-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.12p-7
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi Lamont, Hi security team!
umount -r allows normal users to remove flags like nosuid or
noexec from user-mountable volumes, which could be exploited to
privilege escalation.
Details are at
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:07:18PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Jan Niehusmann [Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:25:09 +0200]:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
be NMUed, please note so in this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
severity 329063 critical
Bug#329063: mount: [CAN-2005-2876] umount -r privilege escalation
Severity set to `critical'.
merge 328141 329063
Bug#328141: mount: umount -r drops nosuid
Hi,
ist cabot still not ready for testing?
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
pgpinjYAmKolD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Jan Niehusmann [Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:23:05 +0200]:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:07:18PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Jan Niehusmann [Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:25:09 +0200]:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:47:49AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
reassign 329063 mount
Bug#329063: mount: [CAN-2005-2876] umount -r privilege escalation
Bug reassigned from package `util-linux' to `mount'.
merge 328141 329063
Bug#328141: mount:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 222384
Bug#222384: mason: Mason does not setup /etc/rc.* links
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
severity 222384 grave
Bug#222384: mason: Mason does not setup /etc/rc.* links
Severity set to `grave'.
tags 222384 +security
Bug#222384:
Hi,
is there nobody with 64 bit to test it? It should be easy.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
pgpnX92kAz4LZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I can not reproduce this behaviour for the package in sarge,
is this bug still current or can it be closed?
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
pgpJY6FBEsJEk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: php5-sybase
Version: 5.0.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
sybase_ct doesn't always return correct results from MS SQL.
mssql module seem to work in all cases but is not packaged.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
ist cabot still not ready for testing?
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts it?
Thanks,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 01:30:12PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
[Redirecting discussion from ale bug to cloned imagemagick bug.]
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:35:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
Imagemagick upstream has released a
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 02:17:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328660: fixed in clamav 0.87-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 328673 wishlist
Bug#328673: very old package, should this be removed?
Severity set to `wishlist'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
ist cabot still not ready for testing?
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts it?
Nobody stood up to
btw, I tried --no-auth-cache and it
does not help at all.
any other idea?
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:02:34AM +0200, Johan Palmqvist wrote:
Package: php5-sybase
Version: 5.0.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
sybase_ct doesn't always return correct results from MS SQL.
mssql module seem to work in all cases but is not packaged.
This
Package: wml
Version: 2.0.8-11
Severity: grave
Hi,
wml segfaults at startup on my (powerpc) laptop. Typical scenario:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/webwml$ make install
make -C english install
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/wouter/debian/webwml/english'
make -C po install
make[2]: Entering
Package: ispell-fi
Followup-For: Bug #326025
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
aspell (= 0.60.3-4)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDLowNeXr56x4Muc0RAoS1AJ4693FdbFfXsISMMrwADr5UO2FcpwCff5wN
JRmnQht+EkiserrE0gbTmuo=
=NZxe
-END PGP
Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 06:05:42PM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
Package: mkisofs
Version: 2.01+01a03-1
Severity: grave
mkisofs segfaults when creating isos.
Example:
mkisofs -dvd-video -V ISO_`date +%d-%m-%Y` -o image.iso image
Segmentation fault
Can you provide an example
severity 329065 normal
thank you
This is not grave bug. It happens only on interfacing MS-SQL and only
on some circumstances.
Ondrej
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 11:02 +0200, Johan Palmqvist wrote:
Package: php5-sybase
Version: 5.0.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
* Ron [Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:56:26 +0930]:
Hi,
Shouldn't this be a bug against the m68k toolchain? Unless something
in wxPython changed that I am not aware of, it has always done this
(and not been a problem) previously, no?
Correct.
I'm not wholly against patching this package in the
severity 329065 important
thanks
Johan Palmqvist wrote:
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
How does this cause data loss and warrant a grave bug?
sybase_ct doesn't always return correct results from MS SQL.
mssql module seem to work in all cases but is not packaged.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 329065 normal
Bug#329065: php5-sybase: sybase_ct doesn't always return correct results from
MS SQL
Severity set to `normal'.
thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
* Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts it?
#289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because last time
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:47:52AM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 06:05:42PM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
Package: mkisofs
Version: 2.01+01a03-1
Severity: grave
mkisofs segfaults when creating isos.
Example:
mkisofs -dvd-video -V ISO_`date +%d-%m-%Y` -o image.iso
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:28:58AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 06:05:42PM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
Package: mkisofs
Version: 2.01+01a03-1
Severity: grave
mkisofs segfaults when creating isos.
Example:
mkisofs -dvd-video -V ISO_`date +%d-%m-%Y` -o image.iso image
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:15:38PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:28:58AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 06:05:42PM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
Package: mkisofs
Version: 2.01+01a03-1
Severity: grave
mkisofs segfaults when creating isos.
Example:
Hi,
ok a friend of mine reproduced it today, can you please
remove these three lines from default.conf in the package?
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
pgpZCEvGyp1o8.pgp
Description: PGP
Changes:
clamav (0.87-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
- Fixes CAN-2005-2920 and CAN-2005-2919 (closes: #328660)
I can not find any policy about it but I think it should be urgency high or
atleast medium. This for building faster (if used) and faster moving in to
Package: crafty
Version: 20.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'crafty' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:
gcc -Wall -pipe -D_REENTRANT -fbranch-probabilities
-fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=k8 -DTBDIR=\/var/lib/crafty/TB\ -DTABLEBASES
-DFAST -DSMP
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:17:35 +0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line firebird: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Uses multiline strings
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
I agree the package should be removed.
--
Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#287884: fixed in openswan 1:2.2.0-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300399: fixed in openswan 1:2.2.0-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
This one time, at band camp, Johan Thelmén said:
Changes:
clamav (0.87-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
- Fixes CAN-2005-2920 and CAN-2005-2919 (closes: #328660)
I can not find any policy about it but I think it should be urgency high or
atleast medium. This for
* Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050919 14:03]:
This one time, at band camp, Johan Thelmén said:
Changes:
clamav (0.87-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
- Fixes CAN-2005-2920 and CAN-2005-2919 (closes: #328660)
I can not find any policy about it but I
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:47:07PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
Changes:
clamav (0.87-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
- Fixes CAN-2005-2920 and CAN-2005-2919 (closes: #328660)
I can not find any policy about it but I think it should be urgency high or
atleast
Package: yafray
Version: 0.0.7-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have a mix of sid and experimental packages and also had yafray 0.8
from source installed before (and working), so sorry if this is the
cause for the crash - but yafray always crashes for me, even with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
package liborsa-doc liborsa0 liborsa0-dev orsa xorsa
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: orsa liborsa-doc xorsa liborsa0 liborsa0-dev
tags 328942 + pending
Bug#328942: orsa: FTBFS:
Re: Matej Vela in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
ist cabot still not ready for testing?
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts it?
As one of the caff/signing-party people, I can say that caff serves
the same purpose as cabot, is a lot
Package: zaptel
Severity: serious
Justification: Fails to build from source
Version: 1:1.2.0-0beta1-1
Tags: experimental
dh_installdocs -a
dh_installman -a doc/ztmonitor.8.gz doc/ztcfg.8.gz doc/zttool.8.gz \
debian/genzaptelconf.8 debian/zttest.8 debian/ztspeed.8 \
debian/fxotune.8
#
Package: kernel-patch-vserver
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge
Justification: root security hole
Dear maintainer(s),
I found the kernel-patch-vserver and util-vserver in sarge can not pass
the testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After some more
tests, upstream author discoveryed
Package: stellarium
Version: 0.6.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
stellarium fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization (-O2 usually
Package: uqwk
Version: 2.21-11
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
uqwk fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization (-O2 usually works) or
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge
Justification: root security hole
Dear Ola,
I found the util-vserver in sarge can not pass the test 109 and 121 of
testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After more tests,
upstream author discoveried
Package: lattice
Version: 0.12-7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
lattice fails to build from source on m68k.
Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log.
| Automatic build of lattice_0.12-7-1 on thing2 by sbuild/m68k 42
| Build
/build-x'
| make[1]: *** [maybe_bootstrap] Error 2
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/emacs21-21.4a/debian/build-x'
| make: *** [debian/stamp/build] Error 2
| **
| Build finished at 20050919-0120
| FAILED [dpkg
Hi,
six(!) weeks ago, you said you will have time to upgrade in 2 weeks. But
unfortunately, since a month still nothing happened.
This bug is not a wish, it is a must fix, because it affects users
security. It is known unfixed for nearly three month now, please take it
serious and respond asap.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:51:13 -0700
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've emailed mhatta, but gotten no replies. Is there any hope for the
bug fixes for the grave bugs in gs-gpl getting install soon? There
are patches in the BTS.
tag 328990 +pending
thanks.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
* Ron [Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:56:26 +0930]:
Yep. Only, I was worried about this m68k trouble taking too long to
get solved. It's been a while already, and until this very morning I
had not heard
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 328990 +pending
Bug#328990: wxwindows2.4: FTBFS on m68k due to -O3
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks.
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: openswan
Version: 1:2.2.0-11
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
openswan fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization (-O2 usually
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 328802 RM: esh -- RoM; old, unused
Bug#328802: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
severity 328802 normal
Bug#328802: RM: esh -- RoM; old, unused
Severity set to `normal'.
reassign 328802 ftp.debian.org
Bug#328802:
Package: ncompress
Version: 4.2.4-15
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi!
There is a recent report about insecure temporary files in ncompress,
similar to the recent advisories about gzip:
http://www.zataz.net/adviso/ncompress-09052005.txt
Can you please check this? There is no
Am Montag 19 September 2005 15:06 schrieb Stephen R Marenka:
Package: openswan
Version: 1:2.2.0-11
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
openswan fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a
Package: jmagick
Version: 6.0.4-0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'jmagick' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
checking for getconf... /usr/bin/getconf
checking whether large file support needs explicit enabling... no
checking for X... libraries
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-8
Severity: serious
Hello,
On the latest i386 Sid, gcc-4.0 does not build from source, on my machine,
and on a buildd (see the logs). With dash as sh, I get:
Will not build the Pascal compiler: disabled for 4.0
Will build the Ada compiler.
Will build the shared
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:17:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324796: fixed in gs-gpl 8.15-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:17:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325570: fixed in gs-gpl 8.15-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:17:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324796: fixed in gs-gpl 8.15-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:17:03 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328929: fixed in gjdoc 0.7.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I summarized my research with:
[T]his might not apply to debian at all.
Michelle Konzack chimed in with:
It does not affect Debian, but Mandrake and Redhat... :-)
Florian Weimer asked:
Can you rule out that it's not reproducible with some other charset?
I can't rule anything out. If I
Package: mkisofs
Version: 4:2.01+01a03-1
Followup-For: Bug #329039
Just experimented. Creating an image from photos:
odin:..vat/digicam/Skotlanti-2005% mkisofs -r -l -J -o /tmp/skottikuvat.iso
papercopy
INFO: ISO-8859-15 character encoding detected by locale settings.
Assuming
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:52:59PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
Am Montag 19 September 2005 15:06 schrieb Stephen R Marenka:
openswan fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization (-O2
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324195: fixed in rscheme 0.7.3.4.b1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324098: fixed in rscheme 0.7.3.4.b1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:47:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327597: fixed in qgis 0.7.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:47:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327597: fixed in qgis 0.7.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324098: fixed in rscheme 0.7.3.4.b1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324195: fixed in rscheme 0.7.3.4.b1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#No answers in the last week, packages unused, old, rc-buggy:
retitle 327629 RM: irmp3 -- RoQA; old, unused, rc-buggy, never in stable
Bug#327629: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
severity 327629 normal
Hi Daniel,
could you provide details why you tagged this bug security, please?
Which vulnerablities are fixed? Is there a CAN assignment from MITRE?
Thanks,
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Florian Weimer wrote:
could you provide details why you tagged this bug security, please?
Of course..
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1766
Heap-based buffer overflow in vidplin.dll in RealPlayer 10 and 10.5
(6.0.12.1040 through 1069), RealOne Player v1 and v2, RealPlayer
* Daniel Baumann:
Florian Weimer wrote:
could you provide details why you tagged this bug security, please?
Of course..
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1766
Heap-based buffer overflow in vidplin.dll in RealPlayer 10 and 10.5
(6.0.12.1040 through 1069), RealOne
severity 328276 important
tags 328276 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Arnault!
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:04:33PM +0200, Arnault Teissier wrote:
Package: freewheeling
Version: 0.5pre4-4
...
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0x08130700 ***
Thanks for your report. I have seen this bug
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:48:49AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Package: wml
Version: 2.0.8-11
Severity: grave
Hi,
wml segfaults at startup on my (powerpc) laptop.
This is actually due to an incompatibility between eperl and perl-base
5.8.7-5, which only happens on powerpc. If you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags #201611 - patch
Bug#201611: partimage-server will not install on woody system
Tags were: woody patch
Tags removed: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 328789 grave
Bug#328789: wml: segmentation fault in pass 3
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 328789 329068
Bug#328789: wml: segmentation fault in pass 3
Bug#329068: Segfaults at startup
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 328276 important
Bug#328276: freewheeling: it does not start.
Severity set to `important'.
tags 328276 moreinfo
Bug#328276: freewheeling: it does not start.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:20:18 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Verified as OK
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Hi, I tested the patch and it fixes the problem, thanks.
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.3-1.1
Hi,
look here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328129
but thanks for the solution ...
Procyon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
Hello
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:45:10PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge
Justification: root security hole
Dear Ola,
I found the util-vserver in sarge can not pass the test 109 and 121 of
testfs.sh script[1]
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: saxon-catalog
Version: 2203-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.3-1.1
Hi,
building a new package from source version 0.99.3-1 does not work for
me, i didn't try 0.99.4 ...
i got the same problem with my newly built 0.99.3-1.1 as with 0.99.3-1 ...
Bye, Procyon
-BEGIN PGP
Package: gcc
Version: 4.1
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental, help
configuring HEAD for i486-linux (instead of the default i686-linux),
libjava fails with 1081 test failures (instead of two with
i686-linux). apparently all the execution tests fail. Compiling the
testcase by hand, and running it,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 329068 eperl
Bug#329068: Segfaults at startup
Bug reassigned from package `wml' to `eperl'.
merge 328789 329068
Bug#328789: wml: segmentation fault in pass 3
Bug#329068: Segfaults at startup
Merged 328789 329068.
End of message, stopping
Package: valgrind-callgrind
Version: 0.9.12-1
Severity: grave
valgrind-callgrind isn't installable since it conflicts with valgrind
2.6, and valgrind 3.0 is the only verison available in unstable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
* Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
should we wait until someone adopts
Here's an idea... Instead of complaining that everybody keeps filing
duplicate bugs why not just fix the packages in sid? That way you
can close out all of these bugs and nobody is motivated to file
yet another duplicate.
Yes, that's acidic. But I feel I've been pretty patient with this
Package: azureus
Version: 2.3.0.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi, I'm using the last Java SDK package from SUN with make-jpkg and azureus has
problems.
It loads and then appears a message that says something about a missed plugin :
The plugin is something like
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:42:32PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:28:04 +0200
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I uploaded mostly Martin's patch with only some changelog adjustments:
(Sorry to Sven for ignoring his patch, but it was easier to edit
Martin's
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
