Hi,
Sounds to me that the package in question is getting ahead of
policy and deciding that the debconf transition is over. Well, is it
just powerpc debian installer that build depends on kernel-images?
Why? I am not sure that merely making this go over to debconf is
going to change
severity 324470 normal
thanks
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael R Head wrote:
I had prevented myself from upgrading to the latest version of dovecot
due to this grave bug. I've upgraded and haven't had a problem with
Maildir delivery.
Thanks for the report Mike.
Olivier, can you confirm if
linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk
space available.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:10:31 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing bugs: package no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:10:31 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing bugs: package no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 324470 normal
Bug#324470: dovecot-imapd: Fails to copy new mails from new to cur directory
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:48:39 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#330338: login: Same Problem with
man-pages in german
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi Christian!
Debian Bug Tracking System [2005-09-26 11:33 -0700]:
- as you stated in your next mail, it doesn't seem that sarge/4.0 is
affected. - sarge doesn't carry a 5.0 version
- thus all sid versions should be okay too.
After checking the advisory I would say that Sean is right,
This built fine for me in a fresh sid pbuilder chroot. I've uploaded
the result of that build.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk
space available.
Thanks for that information. I think Dannf was plaining to
do a binary-upload. But
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:33:02 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line worked for me too
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:35:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk
space available.
Thanks for that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I do not have access to a 2.6 kernel patched with vserver but I
can check on a patched 2.4 kernel with old style patch.
Okay, I have a machine running 2.6 kernel patched with vserver 2.0, so
what can I help you on 2.6 kernel
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:32:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323514: fixed in gkdial 1:1.8.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:48:13AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Sounds to me that the package in question is getting ahead of
policy and deciding that the debconf transition is over. Well, is it
just powerpc debian installer that build depends on kernel-images?
Why? I am not sure
Hi,
On mer, sep 28, 2005, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
libg*2.0-cil = 2.3.90 *are* in Sid. It seems to FTBFS on buildd,
but that's different story...
Get your facts straight: libg*2.0-cil were not in unstable when I
reported this bug. Muine was uploaded the 19th, with the unsatisfiable
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 23:50 -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:35:45PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the
build should be requeued, preferably on auric if
Package: xchat
Version: 2.4.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: Makes the package unusable by most or all users
Hi,
Since two or three days, I cannot use xchat on my machine anymore. It
will start, it will connect to the FreeNode and OFTC network's servers
correctly, and it will even join
Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.9.4.65-1
Severity: grave
Hi !
When I try to launch SBCL, I get the following message:
,
| fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 10204(tid 16384):
| This version of sbcl is compiled with threading support, but your kernel is
| too old to support this.
Hi Moritz,
Debian Bug Tracking System schrieb:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 222384 - security
Bug#222384: mason: Mason does not setup /etc/rc.* links
Tags were: patch sarge security
Tags removed: security
Can you please comment on your decission. Why do you think
reopen 330164
reassign 330164 mysql-server
found 330164 4.0.24-10
found 330164 3.23.49-8.13
thanks
Hello Martin
On 2005-09-28 Martin Pitt wrote:
Debian Bug Tracking System [2005-09-26 11:33 -0700]:
- as you stated in your next mail, it doesn't seem that sarge/4.0 is
affected. - sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 330164
Bug#330164: mysql-server-4.1: Authentication bypass
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
reassign 330164 mysql-server
Bug#330164: mysql-server-4.1: Authentication bypass
Bug reassigned from package `mysql-server-4.1' to `mysql-server'.
tags 320851 patch
thanks
Attached please find a patch for this bug which forces the use of -fPIC when
building all of the .o files used in X11.so. I'm currently in the process
of doing a test build with this patch on paer, and will plan to upload an
NMU for this bug if it works, if you don't
Steve Kemp wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:23:16AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Attached are the patches that Joey (Schulze) approved.
Can you (or Joey) comment: did you use a different patch because you
believe mine to be insecure, or for a different reason? (That's an
important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 320851 patch
Bug#320851: usr/lib/gs-esp/8.15/X11.so: Shared library is not PIC
Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream
Bug#323688: gs-esp: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:32:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#128321: fixed in icemc 0.2.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:32:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327953: fixed in icemc 0.2.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: postfix
Version: 2.2.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
(Reading database ... 11346 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking postfix (from .../postfix_2.2.4-1_i386.deb) ...
Setting up postfix (2.2.4-1) ...
Adding group `postfix' (102)...
Done.
Adding
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:38:37AM +0200, Adrian Neumaier wrote:
Package: pydf
Version: 0.9.8.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing an 'apt-get install pydf' and trying to start it i get the
following output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pydf
Filesystem
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.11-1
Severity: critical
This is awful.
For years I have performed multiple opens of mbox files, using multiple
mutt processes.
For years it worked.
Now it doesn't.
Now, if you do this, message bodies will be nuked out of the folder and the
Content-Length: header
merge 330471 327144
thanks
Ok, I've found it is the problem of adduser and shadow package.
--
.''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA
: :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:49:22AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
Package: postfix
Version: 2.2.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
(Reading database ... 11346 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking postfix (from .../postfix_2.2.4-1_i386.deb) ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 320851 + fixed
Bug#320851: usr/lib/gs-esp/8.15/X11.so: Shared library is not PIC
Tags were: patch fixed-upstream upstream
Bug#323688: gs-esp: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:04:51 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:04:51 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
On Wednesday 28 of September 2005 11:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
(Reading database ... 11346 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking postfix (from .../postfix_2.2.4-1_i386.deb) ...
Setting up postfix (2.2.4-1) ...
Adding group `postfix' (102)...
Done.
Adding system user
reassign 330471 adduser
severity 330471 normal
close 330471
merge 330471 327144
thanks
--
.''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA
: :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 330471 adduser
Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist
Bug reassigned from package `postfix' to `adduser'.
severity 330471 normal
Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist
Severity set to
Package: solfege
Version: 2.0.4-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Solfege did not start.
From the terminal I obtain the following mesages:
~$ solfege
/usr/share/solfege/src/mainwin.py:108: GtkDeprecationWarning: gtk.TRUE is
deprecated, use True instead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I uploaded to DELAYED-3. If you want
to override this NMU, then please upload a fixed version before this
upload reaches the archive.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
tags 325635 + patch pending
Bug#325635: FTBFS: broken build-dependency on libqt3c102-mt
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
tags 327974 + patch pending
Bug#327974: kexi: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch, pending
End of message, stopping processing
For me, the package builds perfectly well. Maybe you were using a version of
postgresql-dev that was temporarily broken?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:47:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327961: fixed in qtdmm 0.8.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
For me, this package builds perfectly well. I think you built the package
with a temporarily broken version of postgresql-dev.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:17:10 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324310: fixed in gmsh 1.60.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: qgo
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'qgo' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
debian/rules clean
perl -w admin/debianrules echodirs debian/debiandirs
dh_testdir
make: dh_testdir: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127
Please
Package: dhelp
Severity: serious
Version: 0.5.21
As the subject says, if I rebuild dhelp using an up-to-date sid
system, then try to install the resulting package (even in a clean
pbuilder chroot), I get a segmentation fault:
Unpacking dhelp (from .../d/dhelp/dhelp_0.5.21_i386.deb) ...
Setting
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:32:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330005: fixed in sctplib 1:1.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: php3
Version: 3:3.0.18-31
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'php3' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
E: Package libsnmp5-dev has no installation candidate
E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:04:05 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323056: php3: FTBFS: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 330291 +patch
Bug#330291: pam's nullok_secure seems to break pbuilder build
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
reassign 330291 login
Bug#330291: pam's nullok_secure seems to break pbuilder build
Bug reassigned from package `pbuilder' to
retitle 330291 missing /etc/pam.d/su from login package
thanks
Let us retitle this bugreport, so that is looks more correct.
amicablement,
junichi
--
Junichi Uekawa, Debian Developer http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/
183A 70FC 4732 1B87 57A5 CE82 D837 7D4E E81E 55C1
--
To
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 330291 missing /etc/pam.d/su from login package
Bug#330291: pam's nullok_secure seems to break pbuilder build
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:53:58 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the Debian Bug report #327319,
regarding FTBFS: gnome_window_icon_set_default_from_file not declared
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:15:24 -0700, Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:48:13AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Sounds to me that the package in question is getting ahead of
policy and deciding that the debconf transition is over. Well, is
it just powerpc debian
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:24:51 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
reassign 330445 kernel-package thanks
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:22:38PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
Package:
linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc,linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6,kernel-package
Severity: serious
The problem:
*
Package: ntop
Version: 2:3.2rc1-1
Severity: serious
When building 'ntop' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
E: Package librrd0-dev has no installation candidate
E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for ntop:
tags 330291 pending
thanks
Committed.
Thanks for noticying and for the patch.
Kind Regards,
--
Nekral
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:54:27 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in 0.1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On September 27, 2005 15:52, Blars Blarson wrote:
Package: kdenetwork
Version: 4:3.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
kdenetwork failed to build on my sparc pbuilder. The sparc buildd log
has not yet made it to buildd.debian.org, so I don't know if if
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:47:16 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330488: fixed in dhelp 0.5.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Harald Welte wrote:
When trying to install gnucash on ppc (unstable), I still get:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gnucash: Depends: gnucash-common (= 1.8.10-cvs20050127) but it is not
Are you sure you're using Debian apt sources and not someone else's
repository? No version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I uploaded to DELAYED-3. If you want
to override this NMU, then please upload a fixed version before this
upload reaches the archive.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
tags 330336 + patch pending
Bug#330336: libsnmp5 not available in sid anymore
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
tags 327963 + pending patch
Bug#327963: fwbuilder: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: pending patch sid
Bug#327017: fwbuilder is not installed after
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 330247 -1
Bug#330247: Install failed. Trying to overwrite
/usr/share/man/de/man1/login.1.gz which is also in manpages-de
Bug 330247 cloned as bug 330541.
reassign -1 manpages-ru
Bug#330541: Install failed. Trying to overwrite
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 294226 normal
Bug#294226: imms: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'errno' was not declared in this scope
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tags 317882 +unreproducible +moreinfo
thanks
I can't reproduce this problem on either of my amd64 or ia64 test machines.
Wondering if perhaps there's a botched diversion involved somehow? Could
you please send the output of
dpkg-divert --list \*libGL\*
and look at whether the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 317882 +unreproducible +moreinfo
Unknown tag/s: +moreinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 317882 +moreinfo
Bug#317882: ia32-libs: package fails to install
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: moreinfo
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: libdevmapper1.01
Version: 2:1.01.03-1
Severity: important
hi
some time ago (e.g. in sarge), libdevmapper shipped with a file
/etc/init.d/libdevmapper1.01
which was linked in /etc/rcS.d and called during boot.
In version 2:1.01.03-1 that script was removed, claiming in changelog :
*
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:02:34PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
merge 330526 330247
thanks
IMHO it's better to have all these grave conflicts
with manpages-XX merged in single place.
Well, unfortunately, 330247 was for login (which was why I didn't report
a dup for login yesterday) and is
Quoting Nicolas François ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
tags 330291 pending
thanks
Committed.
Thanks for noticying and for the patch.
I'm building 4.0.12-4 with Junichi's patch.
/me slams self for bad use of dh_installpam in his attempts to make
debian/rules a little bit less messy..:-|
Thanks,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 330338 passwd
Bug#330338: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is
Bug reassigned from package `login' to `passwd'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: qtorrent
Version: 2.9.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
No file selector is shown when clicking on Open.
Here is the backtrace:
$ qtorrent
QTorrent starting up.. Please be patient as this might some time..
Note: Psyco not detected, take a peek here: http://psyco.sf.net/
Traceback (most recent
Hi!
I ported the two patches to 4.0.24:
http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/mysql-dfsg.CAN-2004-0627_0628.diff
they look straightforward; however, the exploit on
http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/mysql-auth-bypass.pl
still claims that access is granted. It also
reopen 329759
thanks
gconftool-2 isn't in libgconf2-4, it's in gconf2, which isn't depended on
by libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0, or any of it's dependencies.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2005 10:45 schrieb Radovan Garabik:
ok, as usual :-), send me the output of:
stat -f /mnt
python -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/mnt)'
where /mnt is the mountpoint that is problematic (if you do not have
many, could you check them all?)
if you see any negative
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:47:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#321544: fixed in imms 2.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:47:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323317: fixed in imms 2.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:47:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324220: fixed in imms 2.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330291: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:23 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330485: fixed in qgo 1.0.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330338: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330526: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
severity 330376 important
reassign 330376 qt3-dev-tools
merge 330376 326470
stop
On September 28, 2005 10:52, Christopher Martin wrote:
So perhaps Qt3 is being built against certain hardware, and doesn't work
properly against hardware which doesn't have all the features of the
buildd hardware.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:11:17PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:02:34PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
merge 330526 330247
thanks
IMHO it's better to have all these grave conflicts
with manpages-XX merged in single place.
Well, unfortunately,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
tags 329759 - unreproducible
Bug#329759: libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0: prerm failure: gconftool-2: command not
found
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity #330561 grave
Bug#330561: evolution is not installable
Severity set to `grave'.
severity #329811 grave
Bug#329811: evolution: requires missing libsoup2.2-7
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 329811 330561
Bug#329811: evolution: requires missing
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:17:29 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330291: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 330376 important
Bug#330376: kdenetwork: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic
Severity set to `important'.
reassign 330376 qt3-dev-tools
Bug#330376: kdenetwork: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic
Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(I forgot the Bcc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the original mail)
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
reopen 330338
Bug#330338: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
severity 330338 normal
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After installing kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-7 the system doesn't boot
anymore giving the following error messages:
hdh: dma_intr: status = 0x51 { DriveReady SeekCompleteError}
hdh:
I can reproduce this bug and removing these lines isn't solution.
Program should send something on stderr if it thinks something's wrong.
Segfault is always a 'Bad Thing(TM)'.
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo
: :' : 32-050
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:11:18AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:24:51 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
reassign 330445 kernel-package thanks
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:22:38PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
Package:
Hello
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:36:40PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Package: ntop
Version: 2:3.2rc1-1
Severity: serious
When building 'ntop' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
E: Package librrd0-dev has no
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:15:59 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:11:18AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:24:51 +0200, Sven Luther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
reassign 330445 kernel-package thanks
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:22:38PM
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #327849 to gcc-gnats as PR 24111
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111
forwarded 327849 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111
Bug#327849: arm: Cannot handle identifiers with '$' character
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
# submitted Debian report #327849 to gcc-gnats as PR 24111
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111
forwarded 327849 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111
retitle 327849 [PR 24111] [3.4 4.0 4.1 regression] [arm] cannot handle
identifiers with '$' character
tags 327849 + upstream
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo