Processed: Re: Bug#330177: klineakconfig crashes after my latest X updates
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # bug fixed in sid tag 330177 + etch Bug#330177: klineakconfig crashes after my latest X updates There were no tags set. Tags added: etch # downgrade severity to important so that the package could migrate to # etch severity 330177 important Bug#330177: klineakconfig crashes after my latest X updates Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330862: marked as done (heartbeat: ftbfs [sparc] dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/stonith/plugins/stonith/apcmastersnmp.so not found)
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330862: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 2005 07:27:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 30 00:27:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ELFIK-0003Zn-00; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:27:00 -0700 Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j8U7Qwn5002612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:26:58 -0700 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8U7ZWeS012050; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:35:32 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8U7ZWvr012048; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:35:32 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:35:32 -0700 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: heartbeat: ftbfs [sparc] dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/stonith/plugins/stonith/apcmastersnmp.so not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: heartbeat Version: 1.2.3.cvs.20050927-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source heartbeat failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. It also failed on other buildds. dh_movefiles --source=debian/tmp dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/stonith/plugins/stonith/apcmastersnmp.so not found (supposed to put it in libstonith0) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/heartbeat/SNMPAgentSanityCheck not found (supposed to put it in heartbeat) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/heartbeat/hbagent not found (supposed to put it in heartbeat) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/share/snmp/mibs/LINUX-HA-MIB.mib not found (supposed to put it in heartbeat) make: *** [install-stamp] Error 1 --- Received: (at 330862-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 05:49:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 22:49:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMJAI-0006IH-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:47:06 -0700 From: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330862: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:47:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: heartbeat Source-Version: 1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of heartbeat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: heartbeat-dev_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/heartbeat/heartbeat-dev_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_i386.deb heartbeat_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2.diff.gz to pool/main/h/heartbeat/heartbeat_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2.diff.gz heartbeat_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2.dsc to pool/main/h/heartbeat/heartbeat_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2.dsc heartbeat_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/heartbeat/heartbeat_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_i386.deb ldirectord_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_all.deb to pool/main/h/heartbeat/ldirectord_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_all.deb libpils-dev_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/heartbeat/libpils-dev_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_i386.deb libpils0_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/heartbeat/libpils0_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_i386.deb libstonith-dev_1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2_i386.deb to
Bug#331378: cups-pdf: no file created on printing
Package: cups-pdf Version: 1.7.3-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just upgraded tonight my Sid system, and found that print jobs sent through cups-pdf (printpdf) failed to create a file in my home directory. I tried a direct job... lpr -P printpdf funny.txt # simple text file and it gave no pdf file in return. My primary use of this is with an old DOS program from which I have been capturing printer output under dosemu, which will be emailed to other people. It stopped working as well. I am certain of the dosemu setup, as it was working this morning, and it still works with other designated printers. A test page was sent to the printer using the cups web interface, and a resulting pdf file was apparently created in /var/spool/cups-pdf/ There is no indication of errors in any log file that I can find. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.5 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages cups-pdf depends on: ii adduser 3.67.2 Add and remove users and groups ii cupsys1.1.23-12 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii gs-esp7.07.1-9 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an cups-pdf recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 325532
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 325532 patch Bug#325532: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused)) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#330177: klineakconfig crashes after my latest X updates
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 330177 -etch Bug#330177: klineakconfig crashes after my latest X updates Tags were: etch Tags removed: etch close 330177 0.8-beta2-3 Bug#330177: klineakconfig crashes after my latest X updates 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.8-beta2-3, send any further explanations to sagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] severity 330177 grave Bug#330177: klineakconfig crashes after my latest X updates Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331382: syck_0.55-2(i386/unstable): creates hardcoded dependency that isn't provided anymore
Package: php4-syck Version: 0.55-2 Severity: grave There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of syck_0.55-2 on ninsei by sbuild/i386 69 Build started at 20051002-2242 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.67), cdbs, dh-buildinfo, flex, python2.3-dev, python-dev, php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10), re2c, bison syck creates a hardcoded depends: on phpapi-20020918. Current php4 packages provide phpapi-20050606 This makes the php4-syck package uninstallable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331378: cups-pdf: no file.... never mind...
Package: cups-pdf Version: 1.7.3-6 Followup-For: Bug #331378 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) never mind, folks. I RTFReadme file. Out of curiosity, would it be too absurd to suggest a change in how certain changes are reported for packages?? This might involve an email to root about specific usability changes such as this. While seemingly trivial to maintainers, etc., it strikes me as nutty to assume that people would automatically check the README files for all of the packages they install. It took me a while to simply prove to myself where the problem was for this. An email about path changes would have saved a lot of my time. Other kinds of changes don't hit so hard. This one has a direct impact on perceived results. Can developers recognize these differences and somehow include email notification? Thanks for listening. It's late here. Sorry 'bout the ranting, but my head hurts. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.5 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages cups-pdf depends on: ii adduser 3.67.2 Add and remove users and groups ii cupsys 1.1.23-12Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii gs-esp 8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1-2.1 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an cups-pdf recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330606: mozilla-firefox does not start up
Hi! I've had similar problems on amd64... The solution for me was to upgrade fvwm. If you are running fvwm on 64-bit architectures, you might get hit by bug 318504, resulting in exactly this kind of problem. The solution is to upgrade to the version of fvwm in unstable. / Anders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330468: sbcl: Can't start sbcl with kernel 2.4.27-2-686
On Friday 30 September 2005 10:48, Didier Verna wrote: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Expect a 2.4 sbcl, without threading, in my people.debian.org repositry soon. Thanks. BTW, I'm surprised that precompiled 2.4 kernels don't support multi-threading ? They do, but in 2.4 threading was done in a completely different way when in 2.6. For the C world this resulted in a move from pthreads to the NPTL library, for sbcl this enabled the use of more complex features. The end effect is that it now only works for a 2.6 kernel, even 2.4 kernel that are patched to allow the use of the NPTL library seem to pose intermittend problems, so I decided it was better to err on the side of caution. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
Hello On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:46:44PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: Hi Ola, å¨ 2005/10/3 ä¸å 1:54 æï¼Ola Lundqvist 寫å°ï¼ How did you tested and found what kind of security problem? I assume you found you couldn't pass the test 109,121 of testfs.sh  script, right? Actually I run the rootesc program and saw that it was possible to escape. I think the rootesc program is only working for the bug in 2.4 kernel patches in Debian, for other fails in testfs.sh, I guess probably needs other exploit. I have upgraded to 0.30.208-2, I still got the same fails on i386,  but no errors on powerpc after I rebuilt the util-vserver package  from source. Ahh now I see. Missed that you used different architectures in your testing. Yes, that's why I have another powerpc related bug report. Sorry for the confusion, I will help to test on i386 and powerpc for you. I wonder why it do not fail after your rebuild. Maybe it pass only if I compile on a vserver patched system... Could you please confirm this? I just got a report that Bertl have discovered that most util-vserver do make a compile-time check if it is a patched system, otherwise it revert to i386. It explain why it work for you when you recompile on powerpc. Maybe, I should recompile the kernel patch+tools on i386 with a vserver 2.0 patched system, cause I got fails on 2.6.12 and util-vserver 0.30.208-2 from sid still, but all pass with same version from sid on powerpc after a rebuild of util-vserver package. If would be really nice if you could do that as I'm in Germany this week. Thanks // Ola -Andrew -- --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37\ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://www.opal.dhs.org Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327835: python2.3-dev: distutils should not produce -O3 optimizations (required by policy)
severity 327835 important thanks Hi Matthias, Well, given that the current round of arch-specific problems with -O3 have gone away, I think it's appropriate to downgrade this bug report. Even so, policy does say that -O3 should not be used without reason, and it's hard to show a reason for letting this flag be inherited as a default by all packages which build with python's distutils. Just for the sake of clarification, would you accept a patch which fixes python2.3 to allow it to build with -O3 while only exporting -O2 through distutils? Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: python2.3-dev: distutils should not produce -O3 optimizations (required by policy)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 327835 important Bug#327835: python2.3-dev: distutils should not produce -O3 optimizations (required by policy) Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
Package: util-vserver
Severity: minor
Hello
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
Hi Ola,
?b 2005/10/3 ?W?? 3:39 ???AOla Lundqvist ?g???G
Now I have run the entire test suite...
zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/
loop4 -M /mnt/t
Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
VCI: none (unknown)
Sorry, it's my fault again, I didn't mention all the steps.
You should make a loopback file and run losetup /dev/loop4
loopbackfile before run the testfs.sh script.
The VCI shouldn't be none if you have setup /dev/loop4 correctly, I
did same thing and got same errors when I forgot to setup the /dev/
loop4 after a reboot.
Here is what I did for create a loopback file and the run losetup:
# dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=1gb.testfile
# losetup /dev/loop4 1gb.testfs
Note: I have other loopback files running on /dev/loop{0,1,2,3}
already, so I use /dev/loop4 in my case.
Very sorry for made your confused. Could you please test it again?
I think the testfs.sh script will give you information of VCI and do
the real checks on each task after you setup /dev/loop4 correctly.
If the testfs.sh give you fails on 109 and 121, that can confirm this
is bug.
For other fails, you may ask Bertl, cause upstream author knows much
more than me, also much better than I forward your questions to him. :)
I suggest to put or mention these test tasks in util-vserver package
for our users to make sure the vserver patch+tools work properly.
Should I create another report as wistlist or only mentioned here is
enough?
Good Idea. Filing a new bug about this now.
Regards,
// Ola
Regards,
-Andrew
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
Hello
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:42:36PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
Hi Ola,
?b 2005/10/3 ?W?? 3:39 ???AOla Lundqvist ?g???G
Now I have run the entire test suite...
zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/
loop4 -M /mnt/t
Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
VCI: none (unknown)
Sorry, it's my fault again, I didn't mention all the steps.
You should make a loopback file and run losetup /dev/loop4
loopbackfile before run the testfs.sh script.
The VCI shouldn't be none if you have setup /dev/loop4 correctly, I
did same thing and got same errors when I forgot to setup the /dev/
loop4 after a reboot.
Here is what I did for create a loopback file and the run losetup:
# dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=1gb.testfile
# losetup /dev/loop4 1gb.testfs
Note: I have other loopback files running on /dev/loop{0,1,2,3}
already, so I use /dev/loop4 in my case.
Ok. I created a lvm device and used that for testing instead.
Very sorry for made your confused. Could you please test it again?
Sure.
zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/vg00/testdev
-M /mnt/t
Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
VCI: none (unknown)
---
testing ext2 filesystem ...
[000]. xattr related tests ...
[101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
[112]. [113]. [114]* [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
[121]* [122]* [123]. [124]* [199].
---
testing ext3 filesystem ...
[000]. xattr related tests ...
[101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
[112]. [113]. [114]* [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
[121]* [122]* [123]. [124]* [199].
---
testing xfs filesystem ...
[000]* (xfs format failed)
---
testing reiser filesystem ...
[000]* (reiser format failed)
---
testing jfs filesystem ...
[000]* (jfs format failed)
I think the testfs.sh script will give you information of VCI and do
the real checks on each task after you setup /dev/loop4 correctly.
If the testfs.sh give you fails on 109 and 121, that can confirm this
is bug.
It is a bug then.
For other fails, you may ask Bertl, cause upstream author knows much
more than me, also much better than I forward your questions to him. :)
I suggest to put or mention these test tasks in util-vserver package
for our users to make sure the vserver patch+tools work properly.
Should I create another report as wistlist or only mentioned here is
enough?
Made that as a separate bug report.
Regards,
// Ola
Regards,
-Andrew
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329246: Most likely a problem with changed ldd output
Dear all Thanks a lot for reporting and discussing this. I've been on vacation until last week and haven't had a change to look into this before. Apologies. It looks like the underlying problem may be changed ldd output and mindi's failure to parse the new format correctly when assembling the list of libraries to include. This has been reported as 324302 to which I have just added some more information and more importantly a patch to mindi that I believe overcomes the issue. It would be great if one (or more) of you could try this patch against mindi and check whether this does actually fix this problem. Cheers Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#315392: metoo: workaround by removing Mail; caused by kmail version change
Package: kmail Version: 4:3.3.2-3 Followup-For: Bug #315392 I've had this problem several times, too. My workaround was to remove ~/Mail altogether; in that case, kmail was able to successfully recreate it. Since all I have in ~/Mail are folders that correspond to remote IMAP folders, I lost no data. In every case where I had the problem manifest itself, it happened when I used the same account (NFS-mounted) from another machine with a different version of kmail, and then got back. E.g., when I got back to this debian kmail after using the gentoo's higher version (3.4) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (400, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) Versions of packages kmail depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-6.2 KDE core libraries ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc11:3.4.3-13GCC support library ii libice64.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libkcal2a 4:3.3.2-3 KDE calendaring library ii libkdenetwork2 4:3.3.2-3 KDE Network library ii libkdepim1 4:3.3.2-3 KDE PIM library ii libkleopatra0a 4:3.3.2-3 KDE GnuPG interface libraries ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.3.2-3 KDE PIM user identity information ii libksieve0 4:3.3.2-3 KDE mail/news message filtering li ii libmimelib1a 4:3.3.2-3 KDE mime library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.4-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331069: gconf2: GConf server daemon executable missing from package
Le samedi 01 octobre 2005 à 14:28 +0200, Dr. ERDI Gergo a écrit : Package: gconf2 Version: 2.10.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable /usr/lib/gconf2/gconfd-2 is missing from the 2.10.1-6 package, thus rendering GConf2 totally unusable. How so? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Bug#331069: gconf2: GConf server daemon executable missing from package
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote: /usr/lib/gconf2/gconfd-2 is missing from the 2.10.1-6 package, thus rendering GConf2 totally unusable. How so? Without the server running, apps can't get/set any configuration information, since libgconf works by querying the server. -- .--= ULLA! =-. `We are not here to give users what \ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001 `---= [EMAIL PROTECTED] =---' NEW DISCOVERY: Research causes cancer in lab-rats -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331395: FTBFS: ICE on m68k, arm and hppa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: apollon Version: 1.0.1-2.1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Please see #323133: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101 or the build logs on arm, hppa and m68k. You can fix this by: * debian/control: Add 'g++-3.4 [arm m68k hppa], ' to Build-Depends * debian/rules: Add: ### GCC4_ICES_HERE := arm m68k hppa DEB_BUILD_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH) ifneq (,$(findstring $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),$(GCC4_ICES_HERE))) export CC=gcc-3.4 export CPP=cpp-3.4 export CXX=g++-3.4 endif ### somewhere on top of the file. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDQPZ/5UTeB5t8Mo0RAopJAJ424nZ4sD8j8t2/1HWFBWmei7nFcgCdGAvU 1+TkCJNRY4pHI73ooScVwlc= =jvy3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331069: gconf2: GConf server daemon executable missing from package
Le lundi 03 octobre 2005 à 10:59 +0200, Dr. ERDI Gergo a écrit : On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote: /usr/lib/gconf2/gconfd-2 is missing from the 2.10.1-6 package, thus rendering GConf2 totally unusable. How so? Without the server running, apps can't get/set any configuration information, since libgconf works by querying the server. The server was only moved, and the library knows the new location. So I'm asking in what way GConf2 is totally unusable. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Bug#331373: marked as done (python-pysqlite1.1: FTBFS)
to decrement _sqlite.c:1805: error: 'struct memberlist' has no member named 'p_col_def_list' _sqlite.c:1805: error: 'struct memberlist' has no member named 'ob_type' _sqlite.c:1805: error: 'struct memberlist' has no member named 'tp_dealloc' _sqlite.c:1805: error: 'struct memberlist' has no member named 'p_col_def_list' _sqlite.c:1805: error: called object '*(erroneous-expression)' is not a function _sqlite.c:1805: warning: statement with no effect _sqlite.c:1807: error: 'struct memberlist' has no member named 'p_col_def_list' _sqlite.c:1807: warning: statement with no effect _sqlite.c: At top level: _sqlite.c:1814: error: syntax error before '*' token _sqlite.c:1815: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype _sqlite.c: In function '_rs_get_attr': _sqlite.c:1818: error: 'self' undeclared (first use in this function) _sqlite.c:1818: error: 'attr' undeclared (first use in this function) _sqlite.c:1818: warning: passing argument 2 of 'Py_FindMethod' from incompatible pointer type _sqlite.c:1818: warning: passing argument 3 of 'Py_FindMethod' from incompatible pointer type _sqlite.c:1827: warning: passing argument 1 of 'PyMember_Get' from incompatible pointer type _sqlite.c:1827: warning: passing argument 3 of 'PyMember_Get' from incompatible pointer type _sqlite.c: In function 'sqlite_version_info': _sqlite.c:1844: warning: passing argument 1 of 'strlen' makes pointer from integer without a cast _sqlite.c:1844: warning: passing argument 2 of 'memcpy' makes pointer from integer without a cast _sqlite.c:1844: warning: passing argument 1 of '__strdup' makes pointer from integer without a cast _sqlite.c: At top level: _sqlite.c:1883: error: syntax error before 'pysqlc' _sqlite.c:1884: error: syntax error before 'pysqlc' error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20051003-0357 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/python-pysqlite1.1-1.1.6 -- -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.4-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 331373-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 09:08:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 02:08:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMMD0-0007SV-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:02:06 -0700 From: Joel Rosdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331373: fixed in python-pysqlite1.1 1.1.6-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:02:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: python-pysqlite1.1 Source-Version: 1.1.6-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-pysqlite1.1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-pysqlite1.1_1.1.6-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/python-pysqlite1.1/python-pysqlite1.1_1.1.6-2.diff.gz python-pysqlite1.1_1.1.6-2.dsc to pool/main/p/python-pysqlite1.1/python-pysqlite1.1_1.1.6-2.dsc python-pysqlite1.1_1.1.6-2_all.deb to pool/main/p/python-pysqlite1.1/python-pysqlite1.1_1.1.6-2_all.deb python2.3-pysqlite1.1_1.1.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/python-pysqlite1.1/python2.3-pysqlite1.1_1.1.6-2_i386.deb python2.4-pysqlite1.1_1.1.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/python-pysqlite1.1/python2.4-pysqlite1.1_1.1.6-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joel Rosdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated python-pysqlite1.1 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:44:53 +0200 Source: python-pysqlite1.1 Binary: python2.4-pysqlite1.1 python-pysqlite1.1 python2.3-pysqlite1.1 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.1.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joel Rosdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joel Rosdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: python-pysqlite1.1 - python interface to SQLite 3 python2.3
Bug#331395: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDQPtm5UTeB5t8Mo0RAnAgAKC7A7wPsp0D33U+s1ufzRo1nPNY1wCeJKYw msNuCVhphcQlB9Rz6DrNeeE= =+S9P -END PGP SIGNATURE- diff -u apollon-1.0.1/debian/changelog apollon-1.0.1/debian/changelog --- apollon-1.0.1/debian/changelog +++ apollon-1.0.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +apollon (1.0.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Use g++-3.4 on arm, hppa and m68k (Closes: #331395). + + -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:24:52 +0200 + apollon (1.0.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload. diff -u apollon-1.0.1/debian/control apollon-1.0.1/debian/control --- apollon-1.0.1/debian/control +++ apollon-1.0.1/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: net Priority: optional Maintainer: Bruno Sant'Anna [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.0), cdbs, autotools-dev, gettext, libgift-dev, kdelibs4-dev +Build-Depends: g++-3.4 [arm hppa m68k], debhelper (= 4.1.0), cdbs, autotools-dev, gettext, libgift-dev, kdelibs4-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: apollon diff -u apollon-1.0.1/debian/rules apollon-1.0.1/debian/rules --- apollon-1.0.1/debian/rules +++ apollon-1.0.1/debian/rules @@ -2,6 +2,19 @@ include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/kde.mk +### + +GCC4_ICES_HERE := arm m68k hppa +DEB_BUILD_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH) + +ifneq (,$(findstring $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),$(GCC4_ICES_HERE))) +export CC=gcc-3.4 +export CPP=cpp-3.4 +export CXX=g++-3.4 +endif + +### + # Unfortunate hack until upstream uses make distcheck. clean:: rm -f po/*.gmo
Bug#331261: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8: Oops when mounting DVD; unsup command in ide-scsi)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:53:27 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331261: linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8: Oops when mounting DVD; unsup command in ide-scsi has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2005 17:16:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 10:16:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EM7S3-0004tI-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:16:39 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so93838wra for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:16:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=oBA3WBPEqBKhnx4ZPJ1sDsq5+leZAQkDO2abV4T3TZ7o4M9GNPUlhKcZHCGxw+xW56+fRqDn4WkqvcfW+V0QXg0VT19t3qRjcZFHDwuyL+0ZyRyfzxHhbGYo+Un0TNKGra9j51tu2b57MbF83Pvm1ps2NeQX7a8dVVLBTJ1Y2Lw= Received: by 10.54.137.19 with SMTP id k19mr1323952wrd; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.158.19 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 10:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:16:06 -0400 From: Scott Wolchok [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Scott Wolchok [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8: Oops when mounting DVD; unsup command in ide-scsi MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 Version: 2.6.12-10 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** When I try to mount a DVD (mount /media/cdrom1) under this kernel, I get an oops in ide-scsi. The problem does not exist under the 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 kernel. The system fails to shutdown properly after this oops as well; it does the broadcast message from root but then hangs; I can still shutdown with Alt+SysRq+SUB. Note that I have no particular intent or desire for ide-scsi to grab my optical drives in the first place; a suitable workaround for me would be to somehow disable ide-scsi. Dmesg output when I atempt to mount the DVD after logging in follows. Bootdata ok (command line is root=3D/dev/sda1 ro hda=3Dcdrom hdc=3Dcdrom ) Linux version 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.1-9)) #1 Wed Sep 28 02:31:26 CEST 2005 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009f800 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009f800 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0010 - 3fff (usable) BIOS-e820: 3fff - 3fff3000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 3fff3000 - 4000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: fec0 - fec01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fee0 - fef0 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fefffc00 - ff00 (reserved) BIOS-e820: - 0001 (reserved) ACPI: RSDP (v000 Nvidia) @ 0x000f77= 50 ACPI: RSDT (v001 Nvidia AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x) @ 0x3fff3040 ACPI: FADT (v001 Nvidia AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x) @ 0x3fff30c0 ACPI: MADT (v001 Nvidia AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x) @ 0x3fff7dc0 ACPI: DSDT (v001 NVIDIA AWRDACPI 0x1000 MSFT 0x010e) @ 0x On node 0 totalpages: 262128 DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1 Normal zone: 258032 pages, LIFO batch:31 HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1 Nvidia board detected. Ignoring ACPI timer override. ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x4008 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) Processor #0 15:12 APIC version 16 ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1]) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0]) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 17, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) ACPI: BIOS
Bug#330110: marked as done (kaffe: ftbfs [sparc] Configuration sparc-linux does not support the jit3 engine)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330110: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.6-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Sep 2005 00:46:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 25 17:46:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJh8u-000694-00; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:46:52 -0700 Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j8Q0koaU005362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:46:51 -0700 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8Q1CFcn029803; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 18:12:15 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8Q1CFCc029801; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 18:12:15 -0700 Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 18:12:15 -0700 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kaffe: ftbfs [sparc] Configuration sparc-linux does not support the jit3 engine Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kaffe Version: 2:1.1.6-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source kaffe failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. checking whether to use NLS... no checking for LC_MESSAGES... yes checking command to parse nm output from sparc-linux-gnu-g++ object... (cached) ok checking for _ prefix in compiled symbols... no configure: error: Configuration sparc-linux does not support the jit3 engine make: *** [stampdir/configure-jthreads] Error 1 --- Received: (at 330110-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 09:39:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 02:39:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMMg4-0008MD-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:32:08 -0700 From: Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330110: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.6-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: kaffe Source-Version: 2:1.1.6-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kaffe, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: jikes-kaffe_1.1.6-3_all.deb to pool/main/k/kaffe/jikes-kaffe_1.1.6-3_all.deb kaffe-common_1.1.6-3_all.deb to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-common_1.1.6-3_all.deb kaffe-dev_1.1.6-3_all.deb to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-dev_1.1.6-3_all.deb kaffe-doc_1.1.6-3_all.deb to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-doc_1.1.6-3_all.deb kaffe-jthreads_1.1.6-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-jthreads_1.1.6-3_powerpc.deb kaffe-pthreads_1.1.6-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-pthreads_1.1.6-3_powerpc.deb kaffe_1.1.6-3.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe_1.1.6-3.diff.gz kaffe_1.1.6-3.dsc to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe_1.1.6-3.dsc kaffe_1.1.6-3_all.deb to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe_1.1.6-3_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated kaffe package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that
Bug#331293: Update on bug: at won't start any job at all : failure with pam
Finally, things went ok after restarting the at daemon, which was not restarted after a previous upgrade of the libc Sorry for the inconvenince. I'll dig a bit further to see if atd could be automatically restarted when libc/pam/whatever is upgraded. -- Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: gkdial
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package gkdial Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gkdial severity 218014 grave Bug#218014: gkdial, on a 'disconnect' command, kill the parent application (like gnome panel) Severity set to `grave'. merge 218014 29939 Bug number 29939 belongs to package dpkg, skipping. kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: NSS/NIS is totally broken
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 328440 grave Bug#328440: Debian Testing libc6 bug Severity set to `grave'. retitle 328440 NIS broken with bash Bug#328440: Debian Testing libc6 bug Changed Bug title. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331378: marked as done (cups-pdf: no file created on printing)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:02:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331378: fixed in cups-pdf 1.7.3-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 06:09:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 23:09:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net [207.69.195.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMJWH-0006IX-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:09:49 -0700 Received: from user-0c9h577.cable.mindspring.com ([24.152.148.231] helo=hpotter.vaughan.home) by pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1EMJVw-0007jI-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:09:28 -0400 Received: from daddy by hpotter.vaughan.home with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EMJVv-0004qK-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:09:27 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cups-pdf: no file created on printing X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:09:27 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cups-pdf Version: 1.7.3-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just upgraded tonight my Sid system, and found that print jobs sent through cups-pdf (printpdf) failed to create a file in my home directory. I tried a direct job... lpr -P printpdf funny.txt # simple text file and it gave no pdf file in return. My primary use of this is with an old DOS program from which I have been capturing printer output under dosemu, which will be emailed to other people. It stopped working as well. I am certain of the dosemu setup, as it was working this morning, and it still works with other designated printers. A test page was sent to the printer using the cups web interface, and a resulting pdf file was apparently created in /var/spool/cups-pdf/ There is no indication of errors in any log file that I can find. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.5 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages cups-pdf depends on: ii adduser 3.67.2 Add and remove users and groups ii cupsys1.1.23-12 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii gs-esp7.07.1-9 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an cups-pdf recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 331378-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 11:08:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 04:08:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMO55-0002Ae-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:02:03 -0700 From: =?utf-8?q?Martin-=C3=89ric_Racine?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331378: fixed in cups-pdf 1.7.3-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 04:02:03 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: cups-pdf Source-Version: 1.7.3-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cups-pdf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cups-pdf_1.7.3-7.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cups-pdf/cups-pdf_1.7.3-7.diff.gz cups-pdf_1.7.3-7.dsc to pool/main/c/cups-pdf/cups-pdf_1.7.3-7.dsc cups-pdf_1.7.3-7_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cups-pdf/cups-pdf_1.7.3-7_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting
Bug#322855: FTBFS: Syntax errors with freetds build-dep
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:03:28AM +1000, Adam Conrad wrote: I uploaded a fix to Ubuntu to get libgda2 building with the latest freetds. That (mixed up with Martin Pitt's changes to make it build with the latest postgresql stuff), is included in our patch here: http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/libgda2/libgda2_1.2.1-2ubuntu3.patch I'm halfway through building a patch with a set of ifdef that will build with the 0.63 and with the older versions of libfreetds. I'll continue with that, as this patch can be pushed upstream later. My hopes are of having it finished and upload the newer libgda in the next weekend. -- Gustavo R. Montesino Debian Brasil - http://www.debianbrasil.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331418: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02
Package: php4-pear-log Severity: serious Sorry, but the license doesnt really fit the package. You have a php addon thing, using PHP license 2.02, but unfortunately for you this license cant really be used with anything else than PHP itself. It always only talks about the product PHP, not about software. And php-whatever isnt really PHP from the PHP group. Point 5 in the older version 2) is also an advertisement clause. Bad thing which is usually discouraged. And, at the end there is the following text: --- This software consists of voluntary contributions made by many individuals on behalf of the PHP Group. The PHP Group can be contacted via Email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information on the PHP Group and the PHP project, please see http://www.php.net. This product includes the Zend Engine, freely available at http://www.zend.com. --- I doubt that your package is made on behalf of the PHP group. Or that it includes the Zend Engine. As a good solution for this I suggest to talk to your upstream. Looking at the license they choosed they do want to make it available for everyone, so I suggest to use either the original BSD license or the LGPL. The other solution is to reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org requesting the removal of this package. -- bye Joerg towo Das Internet, jetzt auf 47 DVDs - oder auf 2 CDs in der jugenfreien Fassung? pgpxdeM20uqqF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#331396: mysql-query-browser: package dependencies conflict with mysql-server-5.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 331396 libmysqlclient15 Bug#331396: mysql-query-browser: package dependencies conflict with mysql-server-5.0 Bug reassigned from package `mysql-query-browser' to `libmysqlclient15'. severity 331396 serious Bug#331396: mysql-query-browser: package dependencies conflict with mysql-server-5.0 Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318758: marked as done (gnome-blog: dependency change)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:00:32 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318758: fixed in gnome-python 2.10.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 13:49:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 06:49:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1Du9WF-0001di-00; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 06:49:23 -0700 Received: from pool-70-106-197-200.chi.dsl-w.verizon.net ([192.168.1.2]) [70.106.197.200] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Du9WD-00047T-00; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 08:49:21 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jonathan Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnome-blog: dependency change X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 08:49:12 -0500 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnome-blog Version: 0.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable gnome-blog requires the gnome.applet python class. This class has been moved from python-gnome2 to python-gnome2-extras. Upgrading python-gnome2 removes gnome.applet, which causes gnome-blog to fail. Suggested Fix: Add python-gnome2-extras as a dependency to gnome-blog. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.20 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnome-blog depends on: ii gconf22.10.1-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-gnome2 2.10.0-2 Python bindings for the GNOME desk gnome-blog recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 318758-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 13:10:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 06:10:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMPvk-0004qJ-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:00:32 -0700 From: Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#318758: fixed in gnome-python 2.10.0-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:00:32 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gnome-python Source-Version: 2.10.0-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnome-python, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnome-python_2.10.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-python/gnome-python_2.10.0-3.diff.gz gnome-python_2.10.0-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gnome-python/gnome-python_2.10.0-3.dsc python-gnome2-dev_2.10.0-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-python/python-gnome2-dev_2.10.0-3_all.deb python-gnome2_2.10.0-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-python/python-gnome2_2.10.0-3_all.deb python2.3-gnome2_2.10.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-python/python2.3-gnome2_2.10.0-3_i386.deb python2.4-gnome2_2.10.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-python/python2.4-gnome2_2.10.0-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnome-python package) (This message was generated automatically at their request;
Bug#327308: marked as done (FTBFS: Refuses to build against Adonthell 0.3.4)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:32:13 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327308: fixed in adonthell-data 0.3.4.cvs.20050903-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 06:30:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 08 23:30:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EDcPB-00030h-00; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:30:33 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j896UWqk030179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 23:30:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EDQsQ-00016c-0W for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:11:58 -0700 Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:11:57 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Refuses to build against Adonthell 0.3.4 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1070/Thu Sep 8 15:28:24 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: adonthell-data Version: 0.3.3-3 Severity: serious adonthell-data fails to build because it refuses to build with Adonthell 0.3.4: Using /usr/games/adonthell as the Adonthell binary checking for Adonthell's version... 0.3.4 *** This version of Waste's Edge requires Adonthell v0.3.3! --=20 Matt --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDIH7tfNdgYxVXvBARAvJYAJ0eIt9eKWl2lq9eFsMPw9q6SPUd9ACfWrFR PH7sXQxKtruW3BD6H0ZhnfU= =1mCu -END PGP SIGNATURE- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e-- --- Received: (at 327308-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 13:38:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 06:38:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMQQP-CZ-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:32:13 -0700 From: Gordon Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327308: fixed in adonthell-data 0.3.4.cvs.20050903-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:32:13 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: adonthell-data Source-Version: 0.3.4.cvs.20050903-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of adonthell-data, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: adonthell-data_0.3.4.cvs.20050903-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/adonthell-data/adonthell-data_0.3.4.cvs.20050903-1.diff.gz adonthell-data_0.3.4.cvs.20050903-1.dsc to pool/main/a/adonthell-data/adonthell-data_0.3.4.cvs.20050903-1.dsc adonthell-data_0.3.4.cvs.20050903-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/adonthell-data/adonthell-data_0.3.4.cvs.20050903-1_all.deb adonthell-data_0.3.4.cvs.20050903.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/adonthell-data/adonthell-data_0.3.4.cvs.20050903.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Bug#331069: gconf2: GConf server daemon executable missing from package
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote: The server was only moved, and the library knows the new location. So I'm asking in what way GConf2 is totally unusable. Hmm... was there a new release since my bug report? Now it seems to work... but previously apps like Galeon were popping up windows saying configuration can't be saved because of missing gconfd-2 -- .--= ULLA! =-. `We are not here to give users what \ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001 `---= [EMAIL PROTECTED] =---' Szarkazmus: a kleptomania magyar neve. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331270: imms: Not using -fPIC in configure script.
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:48:37PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Your configure script is trying to make shared libraries and it's not using -fPIC to do so. From config.log: Hum, it doesn't appear to be causing any problems. The package built successfully on all architectures but amd64. Which architecture are you seeing this on? I don't think this bug should be RC since amd64 is as far as I know still an unofficial port. Thats not to say I won't fix the problem (once I figure out how). Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328418: evolution 2.4 uninstalable due to missing packages
Am Sonntag, den 02.10.2005, 07:01 -0700 schrieb Jeremy Dinsel: When I look at http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html, I see that gtkhtml3.8 is waiting (3 weeks), but I cannot see libgtkhtml3.8-15 or libgal2.6-common. Do you know what may be causing these two packages from appearing in ftp-master? What you see on the new-list are _source_ packages, while libgtkhtml3.8-15 and libgal2.6-common are _binary_ packages. They are build from gtkhtml3.8 and gal2.6, respectively. HTH, Björn
Bug#331447: libextractor: FTBFS: please rebuild against libmagic++9-dev
Package: libextractor Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Hi, libextractor fails to build from source as libmagick++6-dev is not available anymore. Please rebuild it against libmagic++9-dev. Bye, Aurelien -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc7-amd64 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327603: Orphaning old RC buggy packages
reassign #327603 wnpp retitle #327603 O: asmem -- memory utilization monitor with AfterStep look feel severity 327603 normal reassign #327623 wnpp severity #327623 normal retitle #327623 O: nsmon -- intranet/internet server checker reassign #327624 wnpp severity #327624 normal retitle #327624 O: xmcpustate -- Displays CPU/Swap/Memory/Network load reassign #327627 wnpp severity #327627 normal retitle #327627 O: gtkpool -- simple pool billiard game written with GTK+ reassign #327628 wnpp severity #327628 normal retitle #327628 O: xwit -- a collection of simple routines to call some X11 functions reassign #327665 wnpp severity #327665 normal retitle #327665 O: elvis-tiny -- Tiny vi compatible editor for the base system reassign #327667 wnpp severity #327667 normal retitle #327667 O: isic -- Test the integrity of an IP Stack with semi-random packets reassign #327671 wnpp severity #327671 normal retitle #327671 O: gtkhx -- A GTK+ version of Hx, a UNIX Hotline Client reassign #327672 wnpp severity #327672 normal retitle #327672 O: xlander -- a lunar landing simulation for X thanks Hi all. All bugs above were filed three weeks ago with the proposal to orphan the packages because they are very old and RC buggy. Since there was no response to these bugs I reassign them to wnpp now. If someone disagrees with this removal, please simply close the bug with an upload that also fixes the RC bugs. If you are not able to do so but still don't want the package to be orphaned, please reply to this mail and describe your problem. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Orphaning old RC buggy packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign #327603 wnpp Bug#327603: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `asmem' to `wnpp'. retitle #327603 O: asmem -- memory utilization monitor with AfterStep look feel Bug#327603: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Changed Bug title. severity 327603 normal Bug#327603: O: asmem -- memory utilization monitor with AfterStep look feel Severity set to `normal'. reassign #327623 wnpp Bug#327623: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `nsmon' to `wnpp'. severity #327623 normal Bug#327623: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #327623 O: nsmon -- intranet/internet server checker Bug#327623: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Changed Bug title. reassign #327624 wnpp Bug#327624: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `xmcpustate' to `wnpp'. severity #327624 normal Bug#327624: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #327624 O: xmcpustate -- Displays CPU/Swap/Memory/Network load Bug#327624: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Changed Bug title. reassign #327627 wnpp Bug#327627: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `gtkpool' to `wnpp'. severity #327627 normal Bug#327627: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #327627 O: gtkpool -- simple pool billiard game written with GTK+ Bug#327627: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Changed Bug title. reassign #327628 wnpp Bug#327628: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `xwit' to `wnpp'. severity #327628 normal Bug#327628: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #327628 O: xwit -- a collection of simple routines to call some X11 functions Bug#327628: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Changed Bug title. reassign #327665 wnpp Bug#327665: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `elvis-tiny' to `wnpp'. severity #327665 normal Bug#327665: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #327665 O: elvis-tiny -- Tiny vi compatible editor for the base system Bug#327665: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Changed Bug title. reassign #327667 wnpp Bug#327667: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `isic' to `wnpp'. severity #327667 normal Bug#327667: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #327667 O: isic -- Test the integrity of an IP Stack with semi-random packets Bug#327667: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Changed Bug title. reassign #327671 wnpp Bug#327671: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `gtkhx' to `wnpp'. severity #327671 normal Bug#327671: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #327671 O: gtkhx -- A GTK+ version of Hx, a UNIX Hotline Client Bug#327671: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Changed Bug title. reassign #327672 wnpp Bug#327672: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `xlander' to `wnpp'. severity #327672 normal Bug#327672: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #327672 O: xlander -- a lunar landing simulation for X Bug#327672: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328418: evolution 2.4 uninstalable due to missing packages
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 07:34, Björn Heide wrote: What you see on the new-list are _source_ packages, while libgtkhtml3.8-15 and libgal2.6-common are _binary_ packages. They are build from gtkhtml3.8 and gal2.6, respectively. Thanks for your reply. I realize that ftp-master has source packages and will build the packages for distribution. However, I'm still unclear why the packages are still pending and haven't made it into experimental or unstable yet. If I could get the source packages and compile them on my own, I would like to do that. I have been hoping to use and test the evolution 2.4.0-2 package (released almost one month ago). -j
Bug#327661: marked as done (very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned?)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:00:57 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Upload by maintainer has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 14:52:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 07:52:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EETCJ-0007Nr-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:52:48 -0700 Received: from smtp.lenk.info ([82.165.24.235] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.lenk.info with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1) id 1EETGc-0002cD-Ix for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:57:14 +0200 Received: from vs5-deb.fnb.maschinenbau.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.174.41] helo=djpigpb.djpig.de) by smtp.lenk.info with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1) id 1EETCJ-0007nv-Be for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:52:47 +0200 Received: from djpig by djpigpb.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EET63-0003zG-Mr for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:46:19 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:46:19 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cookietool Version: 2.5-1.1 Severity: serious Hi. During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages that should be either orphaned or removed completly from Debian (unstable and testing) since they have been obviously neglected by their maintainer. Your package did show up on this list and we propose to orphan the package. This usually means that your package matched some of the following criteria: [1] Your packages has not had an upload for more than two years [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**) [3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you might be MIA [4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than 100 users with the package installed. [5] the package was not released with sarge and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true. (**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed more than one month before the time the check was performed. In your case the package is older than 4 years and you didn't answer to the gcc4 related bug (which is now RC) for over one year (I know it was fixed yesterday evening by an NMU...). After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it). The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to proceed. Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel responsible for their packages without needing other people to force them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users. Thanks! -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 327661-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 15:03:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 08:03:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMRqN-0001hV-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 08:03:08 -0700 Received: from smtp.lenk.info ([82.165.24.235] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.lenk.info with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1) id 1EMRqp-000850-P1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:03:35 +0200 Received: from p54a3cd0f.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.205.15] helo=djpigpb.djpig.de) by smtp.lenk.info with esmtpsa (Cipher
Bug#331449: libminpack1: empty package
Package: libminpack1 Version: 19961126-6 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable Hi, After building libminpack1 is an empty package. It is due to the fact the name of the files in the debian/ directory have not been changed, whereas the package name has changed. Quick fix: cd debian/ for i in minpack1* ; do mv $i lib$i ; done Bye, Aurelien -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc7-amd64 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314976: NMU in DELAYED-5
hello, i just uploaded directvnc_0.7.5-6.1 to the DELAYED-5 upload queue on gluck. it is built against the latest libdirectfb (0.9.22-7). patch is attached. ... jonas diff -rNu directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/changelog directvnc-0.7.5/debian/changelog --- directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/changelog 2005-10-03 17:23:48.0 +0200 +++ directvnc-0.7.5/debian/changelog2005-10-03 17:23:28.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +directvnc (0.7.5-6.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * rebuild against libdirectfb-0.9-22 for transition (closes: #314976) + * bumped standards-version to 3.6.2 (no changes needed) + * updated fsf address to make lintian happy + * change xlibs-dev Build-Depends to x-dev, after searching docs and source +i believe that only some x headers are needed to build. + + -- Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:22:37 +0200 + directvnc (0.7.5-6) unstable; urgency=low * Documented display size restriction, closes: #248009. diff -rNu directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/control directvnc-0.7.5/debian/control --- directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/control 2005-10-03 17:23:48.0 +0200 +++ directvnc-0.7.5/debian/control 2005-10-03 17:22:31.0 +0200 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Section: misc Priority: optional Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libdirectfb-dev (= 0.9.20-1), zlib1g-dev, libjpeg62-dev, pkg-config, xlibs-dev -Standards-Version: 3.5.10 +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libdirectfb-dev (= 0.9.22-7), zlib1g-dev, libjpeg62-dev, pkg-config, x-dev +Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: directvnc Architecture: any diff -rNu directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/copyright directvnc-0.7.5/debian/copyright --- directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/copyright 2005-10-03 17:23:48.0 +0200 +++ directvnc-0.7.5/debian/copyright2005-10-03 16:45:35.0 +0200 @@ -29,5 +29,5 @@ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License with your Debian GNU/Linux system, in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL, or with the debarchiver source package as the file COPYING. If not, write to the Free - Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA - 02111-1307, USA. + Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA + 02110-1301, USA.
Bug#331069: gconf2: GConf server daemon executable missing from package
Le lundi 03 octobre 2005 à 16:11 +0200, Dr. ERDI Gergo a écrit : On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote: The server was only moved, and the library knows the new location. So I'm asking in what way GConf2 is totally unusable. Hmm... was there a new release since my bug report? Now it seems to work... but previously apps like Galeon were popping up windows saying configuration can't be saved because of missing gconfd-2 There used to be a possibility of gconf2 being installed at the latest version with an older version of libgconf2-4, leading to no gconfd-2 at all. However this was solved in 2.10.1-6. Another possibility is that some applications were launched before the libgconf2-4 upgrade, and the gconfd-2 daemon was killed for a reason or another. In which case a logout/login cycle should solve the issue. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Processed: reassign 328544 to ftp.debian.org, retitle 328544 to RM: spip-eva -- RoM and RoQA; old, RC buggy ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 reassign 328544 ftp.debian.org Bug#328544: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `spip-eva' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328544 RM: spip-eva -- RoM and RoQA; old, RC buggy Bug#328544: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328544 normal Bug#328544: RM: spip-eva -- RoM and RoQA; old, RC buggy Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331069: gconf2: GConf server daemon executable missing from package
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote: Hmm... was there a new release since my bug report? Now it seems to work... but previously apps like Galeon were popping up windows saying configuration can't be saved because of missing gconfd-2 There used to be a possibility of gconf2 being installed at the latest version with an older version of libgconf2-4, leading to no gconfd-2 at all. However this was solved in 2.10.1-6. Another possibility is that some applications were launched before the libgconf2-4 upgrade, and the gconfd-2 daemon was killed for a reason or another. In which case a logout/login cycle should solve the issue. OK, feel free to close the report then. Thanks, Gergo -- .--= ULLA! =-. `We are not here to give users what \ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001 `---= [EMAIL PROTECTED] =---' X11 is the only windowing system that went from barbarism to decadence without civilisation in between. -- from the Uncyclopedia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331206: marked as done (bugzilla: Two information disclosure vulnerabilities in Bugzilla)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 08:32:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331206: fixed in bugzilla 2.18.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2005 10:12:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 03:12:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EM0pd-00086V-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 03:12:34 -0700 Received: from jmm by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EM0pZ-00083d-4f for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 12:12:29 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bugzilla: Two information disclosure vulnerabilities in Bugzilla X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 12:12:29 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: locally generated X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: bugzilla Version: 2.18.3-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Two information disclosure vulnerabilities have been found in Bugzilla: + It is possible to bypass the user visibility groups restrictions if user-matching is turned on in substring mode. + config.cgi exposes information to users who aren't logged in, even when requirelogin is turned on in Bugzilla. Please see http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.18.4/ for the full advisory. 2.18.4 fixes these issue. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-vs1.2.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages bugzilla depends on: pn apache | roxen2 | apache-ssl Not found. ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-tran 4.50-8 lightweight exim MTA (v4) daemon ii libdbd-mysql-perl 2.9006-1 A Perl5 database interface to the ii libtimedate-perl 1.1600-4 Time and date functions for Perl --- Received: (at 331206-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 15:38:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 08:38:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMSIZ-0004RG-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 08:32:15 -0700 From: Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331206: fixed in bugzilla 2.18.4-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 08:32:15 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: bugzilla Source-Version: 2.18.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bugzilla, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bugzilla-doc_2.18.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla-doc_2.18.4-1_all.deb bugzilla_2.18.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla_2.18.4-1.diff.gz bugzilla_2.18.4-1.dsc to pool/main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla_2.18.4-1.dsc bugzilla_2.18.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla_2.18.4-1_all.deb bugzilla_2.18.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/b/bugzilla/bugzilla_2.18.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated bugzilla package) (This
Bug#328541: Removing old, RC buggy packages
reassign #328537 ftp.debian.org severity #328537 normal retitle #328537 RM: libapache-mod-witch -- RoQA; old, RC buggy reassign #328540 ftp.debian.org severity #328540 normal retitle #328540 RM: elastic -- RoQA; old, RC buggy reassign #328541 ftp.debian.org severity #328541 normal retitle #328541 RM: gman -- RoQA; old, RC buggy reassign #328543 ftp.debian.org severity #328543 normal retitle #328543 RM: brahms -- RoQA; old, RC buggy reassign #328546 ftp.debian.org severity #328546 normal retitle #328546 RM: glimmer -- RoQA; old, RC buggy reassign #328547 ftp.debian.org severity #328547 normal retitle #328547 RM: libopengl-dylan -- RoQA; old, RC buggy thanks Hi all. All bugs above were filed about two weeks ago with the proposal to remove the packages because they are very old and RC buggy. Since there was no response to these bugs I reassign them to ftp.debian.org now. If someone disagrees with this removal, please simply close the bug with an upload that also fixes the RC bug(s). If you are not able to do so but still don't want the package to be removed, please reply to this mail and describe your problem. If the package gets removed you are of course free to upload a new, bugfree version of it. NEW processing should not cost you too much time nowadays... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of fail2ban 0.5.4-5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 330827 + fixed Bug#330827: IP vetting is weak, allowing targetted DoS via usernames There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Removing old, RC buggy packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign #328537 ftp.debian.org Bug#328537: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `libapache-mod-witch' to `ftp.debian.org'. severity #328537 normal Bug#328537: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #328537 RM: libapache-mod-witch -- RoQA; old, RC buggy Bug#328537: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. reassign #328540 ftp.debian.org Bug#328540: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `elastic' to `ftp.debian.org'. severity #328540 normal Bug#328540: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #328540 RM: elastic -- RoQA; old, RC buggy Bug#328540: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. reassign #328541 ftp.debian.org Bug#328541: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `gman' to `ftp.debian.org'. severity #328541 normal Bug#328541: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #328541 RM: gman -- RoQA; old, RC buggy Bug#328541: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. reassign #328543 ftp.debian.org Bug#328543: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `brahms' to `ftp.debian.org'. severity #328543 normal Bug#328543: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #328543 RM: brahms -- RoQA; old, RC buggy Bug#328543: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. reassign #328546 ftp.debian.org Bug#328546: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `glimmer' to `ftp.debian.org'. severity #328546 normal Bug#328546: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #328546 RM: glimmer -- RoQA; old, RC buggy Bug#328546: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. reassign #328547 ftp.debian.org Bug#328547: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `libopengl-dylan' to `ftp.debian.org'. severity #328547 normal Bug#328547: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Severity set to `normal'. retitle #328547 RM: libopengl-dylan -- RoQA; old, RC buggy Bug#328547: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331270: imms: Not using -fPIC in configure script.
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:38:27AM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote: On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:48:37PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Your configure script is trying to make shared libraries and it's not using -fPIC to do so. From config.log: Hum, it doesn't appear to be causing any problems. The package built successfully on all architectures but amd64. Which architecture are you seeing this on? I don't think this bug should be RC since amd64 is as far as I know still an unofficial port. Thats not to say I won't fix the problem (once I figure out how). Right, I probably shouldn't have set this to RC. configure.ac has: if test $with_screensaver != no; then LDFLAGS=-shared -L/usr/X11R6/lib Remove that -shared, regenerate configure, and it should be fixed. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Not RC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 331270 normal Bug#331270: imms: Not using -fPIC in configure script. Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329304: marked as done (fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:19:22 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bugs were fixed in non-uploaded 0.5.4-2 release ( currently uploaded is 0.5.4-5 ) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 02:55:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 19:55:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from www.thaiopensource.org (thaiopensource.org) [61.19.242.42] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHum5-0006a1-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:55:57 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by thaiopensource.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C30E364359; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0700 (ICT) Received: from thaiopensource.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (truffle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06912-10; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:55:12 +0700 (ICT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by thaiopensource.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471163640F4; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:55:11 +0700 (ICT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeroen Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fail2ban: fails to ban because iptables not in path X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:55:11 +0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at sipa.or.th Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: fail2ban Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable Hope this isn't a duplicate--reportbug isn't showing me any known issues for some reason. The iptables blocking in fail2ban consistently fails to work because the iptables command is not in the execution path. This means that the package is completely inoperable when using iptables, which I believe is the most common choice for Debian systems. The patch is to edit /etc/fail2ban.conf: s/iptables/\/sbin\/iptables/g -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages fail2ban depends on: ii iptables 1.3.1-2Linux kernel 2.4+ iptables adminis ii python2.3.5-2An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 329304-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 16:19:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 09:19:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from washoe.rutgers.edu [165.230.95.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMT2f-0003XK-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:19:53 -0700 Received: from yoh by washoe.rutgers.edu with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EMT2A-0006sm-Rq; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:19:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:19:22 -0400 From: Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bugs were fixed in non-uploaded 0.5.4-2 release ( currently uploaded is 0.5.4-5 ) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=tNQTSEo8WG/FKZ8E Content-Disposition: inline X-URL: http://www.onerussian.com X-Image-Url: http://www.onerussian.com/img/yoh.png X-PGP-Key: http://www.onerussian.com/gpg-yoh.asc X-fingerprint: 3BB6 E124 0643 A615 6F00 6854 8D11 4563 75C0 24C8 User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r472 (Debian) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --tNQTSEo8WG/FKZ8E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bugs are fixed in the latest upload --=20
Bug#331372: marked as done (dfb++: FTBFS: missing build-dependency on pkg-config)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:17:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331372: fixed in dfb++ 0.9.22-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 05:30:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 22:30:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMIuZ-0003Kp-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:30:51 -0700 Received: from hertz.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:2e0:18ff:fea3:b80f]) by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EMIuX-0006sE-PU; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 07:30:49 +0200 Received: from aurel32 by hertz.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.53) id 1EMIuX-0005rV-LB; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 07:30:49 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dfb++: FTBFS: missing build-dependency on pkg-config X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 07:30:49 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: dfb++ Version: 0.9.22-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source From my build log: ... ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, libdirectfb-dev (= 0.9.22) ... checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes checking how to run the C preprocessor... i486-kfreebsd-gnu-gcc -E checking for i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++... (cached) i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... (cached) yes checking whether i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ accepts -g... (cached) yes checking dependency style of i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++... (cached) gcc3 checking for pkg-config... no *** The pkg-config script could not be found. Make sure it is *** in your path, or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable *** to the full path to pkg-config. *** Or see http://www.freedesktop.org/software/pkgconfig to get pkg-config. configure: error: Library requirements (directfb = 0.9.22) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. make: *** [config.status] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20051003-0436 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/dfb++-0.9.22 -- The package probably lacks a build-dependency on pkg-config -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.4-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 331372-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 16:19:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 09:19:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMSzx-0002n5-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:17:05 -0700 From: Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331372: fixed in dfb++ 0.9.22-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:17:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: dfb++ Source-Version: 0.9.22-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dfb++, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dfb++_0.9.22-2.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dfb++/dfb++_0.9.22-2.diff.gz dfb++_0.9.22-2.dsc to pool/main/d/dfb++/dfb++_0.9.22-2.dsc libdfb++-0.9-22_0.9.22-2_i386.deb to pool
Bug#331463: please upgrade mftrace
Package: mftrace Severity: serious Please upgrade mftrace to at least version 1.1.16. Upstream says this is necessary to compile lilypond; and the fixes for several lilypond bugs are waiting on the compilation errors being solved. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331109: marked as done (libcsv-ruby1.8: uninstallable due to file conflict with libruby1.8)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331109: fixed in libcsv-ruby 1.2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 15:37:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 08:37:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ip212-226-168-228.adsl.kpnqwest.fi (esme.liw.iki.fi) [212.226.168.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ELjQu-0003S0-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:37:52 -0700 Received: by esme.liw.iki.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AA44475C29B; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 18:37:03 +0300 (EEST) Subject: libcsv-ruby1.8: uninstallable due to file conflict with libruby1.8 From: Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian BTS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:37:02 +0300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libcsv-ruby1.8 Version: 1.2.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: cannot be installed It doesn't seem to be possible to install libcsv-ruby1.8 because of a file conflict with libruby1.8, which it depends on. See transcript below. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get install libcsv-ruby1.8 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libruby1.8 The following NEW packages will be installed: libcsv-ruby1.8 libruby1.8 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 1417kB of archives. After unpacking 5681kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Get:1 http://liw.iki.fi sid/main libruby1.8 1.8.3-1 [1407kB] Get:2 http://liw.iki.fi sid/main libcsv-ruby1.8 1.2.2-1 [10.4kB] Fetched 1417kB in 0s (7845kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package libruby1.8. (Reading database ... 7538 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libruby1.8 (from .../libruby1.8_1.8.3-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libcsv-ruby1.8. Unpacking libcsv-ruby1.8 (from .../libcsv-ruby1.8_1.2.2-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libcsv-ruby1.8_1.2.2-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/csv.rb', which is also in package libruby1.8 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libcsv-ruby1.8_1.2.2-1_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# --- Received: (at 331109-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 17:50:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 10:50:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMUP8-0006as-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:47:10 -0700 From: Taku YASUI [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331109: fixed in libcsv-ruby 1.2.2-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:47:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libcsv-ruby Source-Version: 1.2.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libcsv-ruby, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libcsv-ruby1.6_1.2.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/libc/libcsv-ruby/libcsv-ruby1.6_1.2.2-3_all.deb libcsv-ruby_1.2.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcsv-ruby/libcsv-ruby_1.2.2-3.diff.gz libcsv-ruby_1.2.2-3.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcsv-ruby/libcsv-ruby_1.2.2-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Taku YASUI [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated
Processed: Re: Bug#331256: libtorrent5: Fails when using download throttling
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 331256 serious Bug#331256: libtorrent5: Fails when using download throttling Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331501: build with ancient c++ library
Package: libunit++-dev Version: 1.2.3-2 Severity: grave libunit++ is compiled with an ancient c++ library making it impossible to use on current systems. I haven't tested this, but it might be broken for sarge as well. Wichert. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.12 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug 330048
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 330048 grave Bug#330048: nedit does not start: X error Severity set to `grave'. merge 330048 318261 Bug#318261: nedit: does not start up after installing xserver-xorg (x opcode failure) Bug#330048: nedit does not start: X error Merged 318261 330048. Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293667: marked as done (Mailscanner Wont Upgrade Or Install After Removing Old Version)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:17:52 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#293667: fixed in mailscanner 4.46.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2005 22:29:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 04 14:29:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.eonet.net [209.34.96.3] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CxBwn-0004Gw-00; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:29:05 -0800 Received: (qmail 5219 invoked by uid 8002); 4 Feb 2005 22:31:16 - Received: from unknown (HELO ?209.34.98.168?) (209.34.98.168) by mail.eonet.net with SMTP; 4 Feb 2005 22:31:16 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 16:29:12 -0600 From: Leonard Chatagnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: ChatagnierL-Home User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Debian/1.7.5-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailscanner Wont Upgrade Or Install After Removing Old Version Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: Mailscanner_4.37.7-1_all.deb Version: mailscanner_4.37.7-1_all.deb Repeatable: yes Severity: severe and persistant When I run apt-get upgrade or dist-upgrade before having uninstalled mailscanner I got error messages similar to the one below which occurred after having uninstalled the previous mailscanner version: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ su Password: ChatagnierL-Home:/tmp# apt-get install mailscanner Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: mailscanner 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 91 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1124kB of archives. After unpacking 4796kB of additional disk space will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 137233 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking mailscanner (from .../mailscanner_4.37.7-1_all.deb) ... /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 22: db_get: command not found (Please note: this file does not exist; neither does the dir tmp.ci) dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/mailscanner_4.37.7-1_all.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/mailscanner_4.37.7-1_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ChatagnierL-Home:/tmp# The upgrade failed many times before uninstalling and attempting to do apt-get install mailscanner which also fails with the same error message. The debian user list cannot find a solution and suggests filing a bug report. I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.1, kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 and libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20. Thank you for your attention, Leonard Chatagnier --- Received: (at 293667-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 20:23:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 13:23:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMWky-5Q-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:17:52 -0700 From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#293667: fixed in mailscanner 4.46.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:17:52 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: mailscanner Source-Version: 4.46.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mailscanner, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mailscanner_4.46.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mailscanner/mailscanner_4.46.2-1.diff.gz mailscanner_4.46.2-1.dsc to pool/main/m/mailscanner/mailscanner_4.46.2-1.dsc mailscanner_4.46.2-1_all.deb to
Bug#318137: marked as done (mailscanner: /usr/sbin/update_virus_scanners don't update virus scanners)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:17:52 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318137: fixed in mailscanner 4.46.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2005 18:06:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 13 11:06:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 139-2-adsl.red.retevision.es (servidor.gihemar.com) [80.224.2.139] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dslcn-0001WJ-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:06:25 -0700 Received: from root by servidor.gihemar.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dsluf-0004uj-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:24:53 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eduardo Diaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mailscanner: /usr/sbin/update_virus_scanners don't update virus scanners X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:24:53 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-GIHEMAR-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-GIHEMAR-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mailscanner Version: 4.41.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: unknow -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.30.20050518 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mailscanner depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii exim [mail-transport-agent] 3.36-16An MTA (Mail Transport Agent) ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.14-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.34-1 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-binhex-perl1.119-2Perl5 module for extracting data f ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.45-2 A collection of modules that parse ii libmime-perl 5.417-1Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-cidr-perl 0.10-1 Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in ii ncftp 2:3.1.8-1 A user-friendly and well-featured ii perl 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii spamassassin 3.0.3-2Perl-based spam filter using text ii ucf 1.17 Update Configuration File: preserv ii unzip 5.52-1 De-archiver for .zip files ii wget 1.9.1-12 retrieves files from the web -- debconf information: mailscanner/v3_upgrade: Don't upgrade Hi, sorry for my bad english. I detected that the this version of mailscanner don't run /usr/sbin/update_virus_scanners well. ok: set -x and see gihemar.com:/etc/MailScanner# /usr/sbin/update_virus_scanners + SCANNERSCONF=/etc/MailScanner/virus.scanners.conf + LOCKFILE=/var/lock/subsys/MailScanner.autoupdate.lock ++ perl -e 'print young if -f /var/lock/subsys/MailScanner.autoupdate.lock -M /var/lock/subsys/MailScanner.autoupdate.lock0.042' + '[' x = xyoung ']' + trap 'rm -f /var/lock/subsys/MailScanner.autoupdate.lock' EXIT + touch /var/lock/subsys/MailScanner.autoupdate.lock + umask 022 ++ uname + OS=Linux + '[' Linux = SunOS ']' + GREP=grep + cat /etc/MailScanner/virus.scanners.conf + sed -e 's/#.*$//' + grep -e -wrapper + read NAME WRAPPER PACKAGEDIR ++ echo /etc/MailScanner/wrapper/antivir-wrapper ++ sed -e s/wrapper/autoupdate/g + UPDATER=/etc/MailScanner/autoupdate/antivir-autoupdate + '[' -n antivir -a -n /etc/MailScanner/wrapper/antivir-wrapper -a -n /usr/lib/AntiVir ']' + /etc/MailScanner/wrapper/antivir-wrapper /usr/lib/AntiVir -IsItInstalled + read NAME WRAPPER PACKAGEDIR ++ echo /etc/MailScanner/wrapper/avg-wrapper ++ sed -e s/wrapper/autoupdate/g + UPDATER=/etc/MailScanner/autoupdate/avg-autoupdate + '[' -n avg -a -n /etc/MailScanner/wrapper/avg-wrapper -a -n /usr/local ']' + /etc/MailScanner/wrapper/avg-wrapper /usr/local -IsItInstalled + read NAME WRAPPER PACKAGEDIR ++ echo
Bug#329744: marked as done (kaya: FTBFS (amd64): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:17:44 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329744: fixed in kaya 0.1.24-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2005 06:35:45 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 23:35:44 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c219071.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.219.71]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIh9s-0006BE-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:35:44 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EIh9o-0006AW-H2; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:35:40 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kaya: FTBFS (amd64): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:35:40 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: kaya
Version: 0.1.24-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'kaya' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:
ValueFuns.h:93: warning: 'class ExceptionTable' has virtual functions but
non-virtual destructor
Heap.h: In member function 'int Value::getInt()':
Heap.h:68: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
Heap.h: In member function 'void Value::addVal(Value*)':
Heap.h:132: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
Heap.h:132: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
Heap.h: In member function 'void Value::subVal(Value*)':
Heap.h:136: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
Heap.h:136: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
Heap.h: In member function 'void Value::mulVal(Value*)':
Heap.h:140: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
Heap.h:140: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
Heap.h: In member function 'void Value::divVal(Value*)':
Heap.h:144: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
Heap.h:144: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision
make[2]: *** [Heap.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/kaya-0.1.24/rts'
With the attached patch 'kaya' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/kaya-0.1.24/libs/image.cc ./libs/image.cc
--- ../tmp-orig/kaya-0.1.24/libs/image.cc 2005-08-02 16:04:33.0
+
+++ ./libs/image.cc 2005-09-23 06:01:04.0 +
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
int x = p-sx;
int y = p-sy;
KayaValue img = KayaUnion(0,3);
-KayaUnionSetArg(img,0,KayaInt((int)p));
+KayaUnionSetArg(img,0,KayaInt((long)p));
KayaUnionSetArg(img,1,KayaInt(x));
KayaUnionSetArg(img,2,KayaInt(y));
return img;
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
int x = p-sx;
int y = p-sy;
KayaValue img = KayaUnion(0,3);
-KayaUnionSetArg(img,0,KayaInt((int)p));
+KayaUnionSetArg(img,0,KayaInt((long)p));
KayaUnionSetArg(img,1,KayaInt(x));
KayaUnionSetArg(img,2,KayaInt(y));
return img;
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/kaya-0.1.24/rts/Heap.cc ./rts/Heap.cc
--- ../tmp-orig/kaya-0.1.24/rts/Heap.cc 2005-09-23 06:04:18.0 +
+++ ./rts/Heap.cc 2005-09-23 06:04:15.0 +
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
void Value::str2int()
{
String* s=getString();
-int val=(int)(strtol(s-getVal(),NULL,10));
+long val=(long)(strtol(s-getVal(),NULL,10));
setInt(val);
m_funtable = inttable;
}
@@ -134,11 +134,11 @@
void Value::real2int()
{
double v=getReal();
-setInt((int)v);
+setInt((long)v);
m_funtable = inttable;
}
-void Value::setInt(int i)
+void Value::setInt(long i)
{
m_val=(void*)i;
m_funtable = inttable;
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/kaya-0.1.24/rts/Heap.h ./rts/Heap.h
--- ../tmp-orig/kaya-0.1.24/rts/Heap.h 2005-09-23 06:04:18.0 +
+++ ./rts/Heap.h2005-09-23 06:03:16.0 +
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
valtype getType() { return m_funtable-getType(); }
/// Get an integer out. Assumes you've checked/know.
-int getInt() { return (int)m_val; };
+long getInt() { return (long)m_val; };
/// Get a real number out
double getReal() { return ((Real*)m_val)-number; }
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
/// Update to be an integer.
-void setInt(int i);
+void setInt(long i);
///
Bug#330716: marked as done (crossfire-maps: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper')
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:17:24 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330716: fixed in crossfire-maps 1.8.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 13:25:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 06:25:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c214041.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.214.41] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKyQ6-C4-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:25:55 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EKyQ6-0003BK-0G; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:25:54 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: crossfire-maps: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:25:54 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: crossfire-maps Version: 1.8.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'crossfire-maps' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: if test /crossfire-maps-1.8.0/build != .; then rmdir /crossfire-maps-1.8.0/build; fi rmdir: `/crossfire-maps-1.8.0/build': No such file or directory make: [cleanbuilddir] Error 1 (ignored) dh_clean make: dh_clean: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/crossfire-maps-1.8.0/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/crossfire-maps-1.8.0/debian/control 2005-09-29 13:12:48.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-29 13:12:44.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Kari Pahula [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -Build-Depends: cdbs +Build-Depends: debhelper, cdbs Package: crossfire-maps Architecture: all --- Received: (at 330716-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 20:18:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 13:18:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMWkW-0008Pd-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:17:24 -0700 From: Kari Pahula [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330716: fixed in crossfire-maps 1.8.0-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:17:24 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: crossfire-maps Source-Version: 1.8.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of crossfire-maps, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: crossfire-maps_1.8.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/c/crossfire-maps/crossfire-maps_1.8.0-2.diff.gz crossfire-maps_1.8.0-2.dsc to pool/main/c/crossfire-maps/crossfire-maps_1.8.0-2.dsc crossfire-maps_1.8.0-2_all.deb to pool/main/c/crossfire-maps/crossfire-maps_1.8.0-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Kari Pahula [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated crossfire-maps package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:58:54 +0300 Source: crossfire-maps Binary: crossfire-maps Architecture: source all Version: 1.8.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kari Pahula [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Kari Pahula [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: crossfire-maps - Standard set of maps for crossfire Closes: 330716 Changes: crossfire-maps
Processed: Fixed in NMU of kxdocker 0.35-2.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 296509 + fixed Bug#296509: kxdocker: FTBFS: No rule to make target `xeplugin_dcop_skel.h' Tags were: fixed pending patch sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322855: FTBFS: Syntax errors with freetds build-dep
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 08:45:41AM -0300, Gustavo R. Montesino wrote: On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:03:28AM +1000, Adam Conrad wrote: I uploaded a fix to Ubuntu to get libgda2 building with the latest freetds. That (mixed up with Martin Pitt's changes to make it build with the latest postgresql stuff), is included in our patch here: http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/libgda2/libgda2_1.2.1-2ubuntu3.patch I'm halfway through building a patch with a set of ifdef that will build with the 0.63 and with the older versions of libfreetds. I'll continue with that, as this patch can be pushed upstream later. I guess it's too much to ask for that libgda will be fixed by *not* using the unstable interfaces of FreeTDS, and using instead the recommended libct or libsybdb interfaces? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#292953: aime: NMU prepared
Package: aime Version: 0.60.3-7 Followup-For: Bug #292953 Hi! The RC bug for aime is opened for quite a while now, and the abi transition for c++ is also outstanding. I have prepared an NMU for the package, it builds fine with the patch, if you leave off the chunk for editor.cpp. I've prepared an NMU which I will upload after a week if I don't hear anything back from you. Thanks, Alfie -- Getty intelligenz? Getty hallo? Getty ich hab bandbreite und rechnerpower ich brauch keine intelligenz ;) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#331534: libxml2 testsuite includes pages downloaded from microsoft.com and wired.com
Package: libxml2 Version: 2.6.16-7 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 libxml2 testsuite includes several testfiles that are unclear if they are DFSG free. These seem to downloaded from various websites, without being aware that typically websited do not allow redistributing their content without permissions. Atleast the following files were spotted to be probably nonfree material test/HTML/fp40.htm - Microsoft Frontpage readme file test/HTML/wired.html - Wired.com frontpage test/HTML/test2.html - Old linuxtoday.com page test/slashdot.rdf- slashdot rss feed test/slashdot.xml- slashdot rss feed test/slashdot16.xml - slashdot rss feed test/wap.xml - !-- (C) 1999, 2000 WAP Forum Ltd. All rights reserved -- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libxml2 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331540: eperl: fails to work in nph mode
Package: eperl
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
In NPH compliant mode with it fails to display environment variables
like SERVER_NAME and many others. The script test.epl like this one:
?
foreach $var (sort(keys(%ENV))) {
$val = $ENV{$var};
$val =~ s|\n|\\n|g;
$val =~ s||\\|g;
print ${var}=\${val}\\n;
}
!
gives only:
DOCUMENT_ROOT=/var/www
HTTP_ACCEPT=text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5
HTTP_ACCEPT_CHARSET=ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
which is too little and renders my old eperl written pages unusable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331541: gnupg-doc: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1] includes non-free documents
Package: gnupg-doc Version: 2003.04.06-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello! Two included documents are released under the GNU FDL license (version 1.1 or later), although with no unmodifiable unremovable parts (i.e. Invariant Sections, Front/Back-Cover Texts, ...). Nonetheless, the consensus on debian-legal is that a work licensed under the terms of the GNU FDL v1.1 or later does not meet the DFSG, even if it does not include unmodifiable unremovable parts. Consequently those two documents do not comply with the DFSG. Corresponding copyright holders should be contacted and asked to relicense the documents in a DFSG-free manner (for instance under the GNU GPL or possibly under a dual GFDL/GPL license). [Note that, for the GNU Privacy Handbook, there's little hope to see it relicensed, since the copyright holder is the FSF.] If upstream do not agree to such license change, the documents should be purged from this package and possibly moved to an appropriate non-free package. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.31 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317208: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDQbDi5UTeB5t8Mo0RAh5FAJ9sCnc1qM62knpb667ysWaacF5hFwCfXQWn
mbg21XlH2YcW2GUxGWTWgDs=
=3CD9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -u koffice-1.3.5/debian/changelog koffice-1.3.5/debian/changelog
--- koffice-1.3.5/debian/changelog
+++ koffice-1.3.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+koffice (1:1.3.5-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rebuilt for the Qt/KDE transition
+(closes: #327977, #317208, #330532, #322163)
+ * Patch to fix compilation (closes: #327396, #287164)
+
+ -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 3 Oct 2005 18:02:10 +0200
+
koffice (1:1.3.5-4) unstable; urgency=high
* Fixed kpresenter templates for screen presentations (closes: #305989).
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- koffice-1.3.5.orig/lib/kformula/kformuladocument.h
+++ koffice-1.3.5/lib/kformula/kformuladocument.h
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
class ContextStyle;
class SymbolAction;
class SymbolTable;
-
+class DocumentWrapper;
/**
* small utility class representing a sortable (by x,y position) list
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- koffice-1.3.5.orig/lib/kotext/koAutoFormatDia.h
+++ koffice-1.3.5/lib/kotext/koAutoFormatDia.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include qlineedit.h
#include koAutoFormat.h
+class QComboBox;
class QPushButton;
class QCheckBox;
class QVBox;
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- koffice-1.3.5.orig/filters/olefilters/winword97/msword.cc
+++ koffice-1.3.5/filters/olefilters/winword97/msword.cc
@@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@
// The grupx reader code has to know about the alignment of the STD. We
// choose to store this in a convenient field.
-out-fScratch = ((int)in 1);
+out-fScratch = ((long)in 1);
// If the baseInFile is less than 10, then the style name is not stored in
unicode!
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- koffice-1.3.5.orig/filters/olefilters/winword97/properties.cc
+++ koffice-1.3.5/filters/olefilters/winword97/properties.cc
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@
// Align to an even-byte offset *within* the STD. The alignment
// of the STD was stored in fScratch.
-if (((int)grpprl 1) ^ style.fScratch)
+if (((long)grpprl 1) ^ style.fScratch)
grpprl++;
grpprl += MsWordGenerated::read(grpprl, cbUpx);
if (cbUpx)
@@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@
// Align to an even-byte offset *within* the STD. The alignment
// of the STD was stored in fScratch.
-if (((int)grpprl 1) ^ style.fScratch)
+if (((long)grpprl 1) ^ style.fScratch)
grpprl++;
grpprl += MsWordGenerated::read(grpprl, cbUpx);
if (cbUpx)
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- koffice-1.3.5.orig/filters/karbon/ai/aiparserbase.h
+++ koffice-1.3.5/filters/karbon/ai/aiparserbase.h
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
class ModuleHandlerBase;
class EmbeddedHandlerBase;
class TextHandlerBase;
-class Ai88Handler;
-class Ai3Handler;
+class AI88Handler;
+class AI3Handler;
/**
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dirk Schönberger
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- koffice-1.3.5.orig/filters/kword/mswrite/structures_generated.cpp
+++ koffice-1.3.5/filters/kword/mswrite/structures_generated.cpp
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
if (!Verify (Error::InvalidFormat, m_magic2 == 0xAB00, DWord
(m_magic2))) return false;
for (int i = 0; i 4; i++)
{
- if (!Verify (Error::InvalidFormat, m_zero2 [i] == 0,
DWord (m_zero2))) return false;
+ if (!Verify (Error::InvalidFormat, m_zero2 [i] == 0,
long (m_zero2))) return false;
}
if (!Verify (Error::InvalidFormat, m_numCharBytesPlus128 =
128, DWord (m_numCharBytesPlus128))) return false;
// m_pageParaInfo will not be checked
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
// m_pageFontTable will not be checked
for (int i = 0; i 33; i++)
{
- if (!Verify (Error::Warn, m_zero3 [i] == 0, DWord
(m_zero3))) return false;
+ if (!Verify (Error::Warn, m_zero3 [i] == 0, long
(m_zero3))) return false;
}
if (!Verify (Error::InvalidFormat, m_numPages 0, DWord
(m_numPages))) return false;
return true;
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@
// m_lineSpacing will not be checked
for (int i = 0; i 2; i++)
{
- if (!Verify (Error::Warn, m_zero [i] == 0, DWord
(m_zero))) return false;
+ if (!Verify (Error::Warn, m_zero [i] == 0, long
(m_zero))) return false;
}
// m_headerOrFooter will not be checked
// m_isNotNormalParagraph will not be checked
@@ -1252,7 +1252,7
Bug#331540: eperl: fails to work in nph mode
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 04:53:38PM -0500, Carter Wiggins wrote: [...] gives only: DOCUMENT_ROOT=/var/www HTTP_ACCEPT=text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5 HTTP_ACCEPT_CHARSET=ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 which is too little and renders my old eperl written pages unusable. Do you mean that this is a regression? Can you please tell which version worked? Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317208: Intention to NMU
Hi, Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Regarding koffice: I'd be happy if you could give me another 48 hours or so to finish the koffice 1.4.2 packaging (which I agree has been terribly delayed thus far). If you don't see anything uploaded by then however, please do go ahead with the NMU. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#321083: NMU diff
Hi Masayuki, Here is the enchant 1.1.6-1.1 NMU diff. -- Joshua Kwan diff --exclude config.guess --exclude config.sub -ur ../enchant-1.1.6/debian/changelog enchant-1.1.6/debian/changelog --- ../enchant-1.1.6/debian/changelog 2005-09-29 22:37:00.0 -0700 +++ enchant-1.1.6/debian/changelog 2005-10-03 15:49:14.0 -0700 @@ -1,10 +1,3 @@ -enchant (1.1.6-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium - - * Non-maintainer upload. - * Tighten build-deps on myspell. closes: #321083 - - -- Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:34:39 -0700 - enchant (1.1.6-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release - closes: #302637 diff --exclude config.guess --exclude config.sub -ur ../enchant-1.1.6/debian/control enchant-1.1.6/debian/control --- ../enchant-1.1.6/debian/control 2005-09-29 22:34:30.0 -0700 +++ enchant-1.1.6/debian/control2005-10-03 15:49:14.0 -0700 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), hspell (= 0.7-2), libmyspell-dev (= 1:3.0+pre3.1-12), libpspell-dev (= 0.60.3-3), libglib2.0-dev, libz-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), hspell (= 0.7-2), libmyspell-dev (= 1:3.1-14), libpspell-dev (= 0.60.3-3), libglib2.0-dev, libz-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1 Package: libenchant-dev signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of enchant 1.1.6-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 321083 + fixed Bug#321083: needs tightened build dependency on libmyspell-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #14619 (project findutils): Does -perm /... do what you expected -perm +... to do? ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=14619 ___ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318012: marked as done (python-crypto: uninstallable because of libgmp3 dependency)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318012: fixed in python-crypto 2.0.1+dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2005 21:13:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 12 14:13:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DsS4i-0004PT-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:13:56 -0700 Received: (qmail 26959 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2005 21:13:25 - Received: from unknown (HELO vertex) ([EMAIL PROTECTED] with login) by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jul 2005 21:13:25 - Received: from ttb by vertex with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DsS4R-0002H7-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:13:39 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John McCutchan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: revelation: Can't be installed because of libgmp3 dependency X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:13:39 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: revelation Version: 0.4.3-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Revelation depends on libgmp3 but it doesn't exist anymore. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc2 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages revelation depends on: ii cracklib2 2.7-17 pro-active password checker librar ii gconf22.10.0-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii gnome-icon-theme 2.10.1-2 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.5-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.8-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o pn python-crypto none (no description available) ii python-gnome2 2.10.0-2 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python-gtk2 2.6.2-1Python bindings for the GTK+ widge ii python-xml0.8.4-1XML tools for Python [dummy packag ii shared-mime-info 0.16-3 FreeDesktop.org shared MIME databa revelation recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 318012-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 23:39:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 16:39:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMZmy-X3-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:32:08 -0700 From: Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#318012: fixed in python-crypto 2.0.1+dfsg1-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: python-crypto Source-Version: 2.0.1+dfsg1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-crypto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/python-crypto/python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1.diff.gz python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1.dsc to pool/main/p/python-crypto/python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1.dsc python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/python-crypto/python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz to
Bug#318055: marked as done (python2.3-crypto is uninstallable)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318055: fixed in python-crypto 2.0.1+dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2005 06:21:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 12 23:21:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.83] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dsacz-0007LF-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:21:54 -0700 Received: (qmail 21613 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2005 06:21:23 - Received: from unknown (HELO vertex) ([EMAIL PROTECTED] with login) by smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2005 06:21:22 - Received: from ttb by vertex with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dsacu-9i-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 02:21:48 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John McCutchan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python2.3-crypto is uninstallable X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 02:21:45 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: python2.3-crypto Version: 2.0+dp1-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software python2.3-crypto is uninstallabe, because it depends on libgmp3 which is gone (?). Because of this revelation can't be installed! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc2 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 318055-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 23:39:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 16:39:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMZmy-X5-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:32:08 -0700 From: Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#318055: fixed in python-crypto 2.0.1+dfsg1-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: python-crypto Source-Version: 2.0.1+dfsg1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-crypto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/python-crypto/python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1.diff.gz python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1.dsc to pool/main/p/python-crypto/python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1.dsc python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/python-crypto/python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/python-crypto/python-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz python2.3-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/python-crypto/python2.3-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb python2.4-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/python-crypto/python2.4-crypto_2.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated python-crypto package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 00:10:40 +0200 Source: python-crypto Binary: python2.4-crypto python-crypto python2.3-crypto
Bug#330902: xmms-alarm-bmp1 0.3.6-0.1 uninstallable on unstable
Hi, When beep-media-player 0.9.7 is out, xmms-alarm-bmp1 is not needed any more but beep-media-player is. I'll do package bmp-alarm ASAP. Done with new package bmp-alarm instead of xmms-alarm-bmp1, everything wil be okay. Cheers, Yooseong On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 01:23:40PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: Package: xmms-alarm-bmp1 Version: 0.3.6-0.1 Severity: grave xmms-alarm-bmp1 is uninstallable on unstable: Package: xmms-alarm-bmp1 Version: 0.3.6-0.1 Depends: xmms (= 1.2), beep-media-player (= 0.9.6.1) Package: beep-media-player Version: 0.9.7-1.1 Besides that, I fail to see why the package depends on xmms, since there is a separate xmms-alarm package (which depends on xmms). Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ -- -- Yooseong Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian(-KR) Developer http://www.debian.org http://www.debian.or.kr http://master.debian.or.kr/~yooseong CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330827: IP vetting is weak, allowing targetted DoS via usernames
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 03:04:20AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Hi Joshua, Thank you for you feedback. If you have a moment could you please give a try to the fixed revision. I've placed in changelog entry which states that it is necessary to update config file to have the breach closed http://itanix.rutgers.edu/rumba/dists/unstable/perspect/binary-all/net/fail2ban_0.5.4-5pre1_all.deb Do you think that the solution I've proposed is sufficient to close the bug? Hi Yaroslav, sorry for my uselessly late reply. The approach should work but I have two concerns. Please consider them yourself. 1) The package does not on install make it clear (at least with my debian configuration) that replacing the configuration file is necessary to close the bug. I'm not even sure how this would be done in the debian world, save perhaps an email to the system owner? 2) The regex is not verifiable nor even understandable by me. I accept that sophisticated regex has its place, but it is effectively a bit of a programming language, and I think configfiles should not really contain significant chunks of code, especially ones that are moderately opaque. I'm sure I could go to some effort to read the python regex docs to find out what is going on there, but I was hoping for something that would be apparent to any admin so it could be vetted and/or updated as necessary. Is this a reasonable approach? 1) Regex which identifies a false login. This can be as simple as before. If someone logs in as illegal user to create a false positive, so be it. 2) Second pattern which simply identifies the IP address component of the line. I think these can both be kept simple. Should I be sending these to the upstream author, or will he/she probably see all this anyway. Aside: Many thanks to my debian maintainers. I should buy you all a beer. -josh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331565: missing build-dependency on fdupes
Package: openclipart Severity: serious iHi, the openclipart build uses fdupes but does not build-depend on it. Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330733: twiki: INCLUDE function allows arbitrary shell command execution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven,
I have not attempted to reproduce this in the debian package, I'm
tracking known vulnerabilities with the testing-security team. When I
see a new CVE id assigned to a package and no bugs filed on that package
regarding that CVE, and no entries in the changelogs noting that it has
been fixed, I tend to believe that it hasn't been because it is a rare
package maintainer who has security issues fixed before they are
discovered or announced.
Additionally, the advisory indicates that the version in debian
(20040902-3) is affected, as the only versions it indicates are safe is
the TWikiRelease01Sep2004 patched with Florian Weimer's
UncoordinatedSecurityAlert23Feb2005 patches. Without any indication in
the BTS or in changelogs, I assume that the package is affected because
the version numbers typically are very good indicators. Admittedly, you
could very well have addressed this issue, and I have a feeling that you
have as Florian is very active in Debian. If so, I'd be happy to know
that, and we can close this bug, so I can note it in the
testing-security database.
Unfortunately, if I had to try every exploit, even those without
published exploits, for every CVE assigned, there would be a net loss. I
understand that this means this is an annoyance to you to get a grave
bug report for something that you may have addressed, however it ends up
being a good thing because then we know for sure, and can better track
vulnerabilities in Debian. It is better to be asked once if this is an
issue and have it properly noted, than for Debian to not pay attention
to anything at all and be riddled with security holes.
micah
Sven Dowideit wrote:
excellent.
Micah, did you manage to reproduce this in the debian package at all?
you see, the debian package is significantly more secure than the
upstream version, and as you've marked it as grave, I presume that you
have found a way to make it happen. (as when I had a go, i did not get
the exploit (i got a unhelpful, but correct error message invalid
number argument at /usr/share/perl5/TWiki.pm line 3339.)
could you please either tell me how to reproduce the problem in the
current debian package, or close it?
Cheers
Sven
Micah Anderson wrote:
Package: twiki
Version: 20040902-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A new security bug in twiki showed up today:
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/SecurityAlertExecuteCommandsWithInclude
An attacker is able to execute arbitrary shell commands with the
privileges of the web server process. The TWiki INCLUDE function
enables a malicious user to compose a command line executed by the
Perl backtick (`) operator.
The rev parameter of the INCLUDE variable is not checked properly for
shell metacharacters and is thus vulnerable to revision numbers
containing pipes and shell commands. The exploit is possible on
included topics with two or more revisions.
Example INCLUDE variable exploiting the rev parameter:
%INCLUDE{ Main.TWikiUsers rev=2|less /etc/passwd }%
The same vulnerability is exposed to all Plugins and add-ons that use
TWiki::Func::readTopicText function to read a previous topic revision.
This has been tested on TWiki:Plugins.RevCommentPlugin and
TWiki:Plugins.CompareRevisionsAddon.
If access to TWiki is not restricted by other means, attackers can use
the revision function with or without prior authentication, depending
on the configuration.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project has assigned the name
CAN-2005-3056 to this vulnerability. Please include this number in any
changelogs fixing this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDQeLS9n4qXRzy1ioRAh14AJ94XXJC7UaX0vlpo+VIOqr+qRHM0QCfYf1Q
9ftwzksPFsreIMdvPx4Du2A=
=Khzi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330827: IP vetting is weak, allowing targetted DoS via usernames
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 06:37:36PM -0700, Joshua Rodman wrote: 1) The package does not on install make it clear (at least with my debian configuration) that replacing the configuration file is necessary to close the bug. Totally agree - I should've at least echo warning in postinst script. Heh heh... that is sad that I'm not a DD yet, so all my uploads have to go through a sponsor, and that delays uploads some times and I don't want to bother him too often. I will add notification but it I am not sure when new version makes its way to the Debian repository. At least anyone who uses my local repository will get it ;-) I'm not even sure how this would be done in the debian world, save perhaps an email to the system owner? I think that it is common to just produce a warning message to the stdout. I need to check, may be dev debian documents or policy has something regarding such cases 2) The regex is not verifiable nor even understandable by me. I accept that sophisticated regex has its place, but it is effectively a bit of a programming language, and I think configfiles should not really contain significant chunks of code, especially ones that are moderately opaque. Indeed... it is a bit cryptic because I am damn pragmatic programmer, so I hate code duplication. That is why I had such approach to build regexp as well -- now I don't have 3 or 4 simpler failregex'es with the common base, which I would need to correct in all of them if I detect a bug. Rather I have a single regex. Besides that, using full-featured regexp engine of python provides another advantage of being able to create complex match patterns if such are necessary. May be I should place txt2regex among Suggest:? That one is quite nice to help anyone to build a regexp (including for python) Besides that regular users or sysadmins are not even supposed to tune failregex to have basic functionality to be performed. Me (and the upstream) author are going to incorporate or at least include in the package more of the configurations for different servers (imap, smtp, etc). Is this a reasonable approach? 1) Regex which identifies a false login. This can be as simple as before. If someone logs in as illegal user to create a false positive, so be it. 2) Second pattern which simply identifies the IP address component of the line. Well - that is how it was done before, and lead to the security breach. 2nd pattern was a generic pattern for an IP address, and that is why all substrings containing IP address were matched, including in the placeholders of the usernames. I don't see sufficiently generic way to employ in 2) besides scanning the whole line for IP address, unless I use full regexp as I did. By employing regexp to match the logged line, I eliminated such possibility and made it more or less generic, thus I had minimal amount of real code of fail2ban to change to make it work. I open for more specific suggestions on how to make it work in a cleaner way ;-) Should I be sending these to the upstream author, or will he/she probably see all this anyway. I will update him as soon as he gets back in touch (he is away at the moment), so it would be better if you just trust be on that ;-) He might have some better idea on how to handle this case as well ;-) Aside: Many thanks to my debian maintainers. I should buy you all a beer. cyber-beer -- yammy ;-)) Thanx -- .-. =-- /v\ = Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User^^-^^[17] pgphhO4cDzfns.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#327316: marked as done (FTBFS: Unable to execute automake-1.7)
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 19:47:13 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327316: fixed in sdl-net1.2 1.2.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 06:32:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 08 23:32:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EDcQu-0003mP-00; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:32:20 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j896WJu6030232 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 23:32:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EDPe7-yD-PV for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 09:53:07 -0700 Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:53:07 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Unable to execute automake-1.7 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=H1spWtNR+x+ondvy Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1070/Thu Sep 8 15:28:24 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --H1spWtNR+x+ondvy Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Disposition: inline --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: sdl-net1.2 Version: 1.2.5-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch sdl-net1.2 fails to build because it cannot execute automake-1.7: cd . \ automake-1.7 --foreign Makefile /bin/sh: automake-1.7: command not found Adding a build-dependency on automake1.7 fixes this problem. --=20 Matt --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff -u sdl-net1.2-1.2.5/debian/control sdl-net1.2-1.2.5/debian/control --- sdl-net1.2-1.2.5/debian/control +++ sdl-net1.2-1.2.5/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: libs Priority: optional Maintainer: Mike Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libsdl1.2-dev (=3D 1.2.5), autotools= -dev, dpatch +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libsdl1.2-dev (=3D 1.2.5), autotools= -dev, dpatch, automake1.7 Standards-Version: 3.6.1 =20 Package: libsdl-net1.2-dev --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- --H1spWtNR+x+ondvy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDIGxzfNdgYxVXvBARAp7bAJ464yB8hfr6iEL+/7PN12HMoyG2bwCfSHe0 iyVFW/K8qE5MNDy1l+Y/cHQ= =SJPH -END PGP SIGNATURE- --H1spWtNR+x+ondvy-- --- Received: (at 327316-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 02:48:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 19:48:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMcpl-0001Y3-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 19:47:13 -0700 From: Mike Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327316: fixed in sdl-net1.2 1.2.5-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 19:47:13 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sdl-net1.2 Source-Version: 1.2.5-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sdl-net1.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libsdl-net1.2-dev_1.2.5-5_i386.deb to
Bug#331569: Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev
Package: libedataserver1.2-dev Version: 1.2.3-4 Severity: serious libedataserver-1.2.la includes libdb-4.2.la in dependency_libs but libedataserver1.2-dev does not depend on libdb4.2-dev. This causes contact-lookup-applet to fail to build. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#331572: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on kernel-tree-2.6.10-4
Package: cman-kernel Version: 0.trunk20050206-1 Severity: serious cman-kernel fails to build because it build-depends on kernel-tree-2.6.10-4, which is not available: - Considering kernel-tree-2.6.10-4 - Trying kernel-tree-2.6.10-4 - Cannot install kernel-tree-2.6.10-4; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Couldn't find package kernel-tree-2.6.10-4 -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#331571: Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev
Package: libcamel1.2-dev Version: 1.2.3-4 Severity: serious libcamel-1.2.la and libcamel-provider-1.2.la both include libdb-4.2.la in their dependency_libs, but libcamel1.2-dev does not depend on libdb4.2-dev. This causes contact-lookup-applet to fail to build. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#331573: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev | nvidia-glx-dev
Package: crystalspace Version: 0.98-20040623-2.1 Severity: serious crystalspace fails to build because its build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev | nvidia-glx-dev cannot be satisfied: - Considering xlibmesa-dev | nvidia-glx-dev - Trying xlibmesa-dev - Cannot install xlibmesa-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Package xlibmesa-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: xlibmesa-gl-dev libglu1-xorg-dev E: Package xlibmesa-dev has no installation candidate - Trying nvidia-glx-dev - Cannot install nvidia-glx-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Package nvidia-glx-dev has no installation candidate Package nvidia-glx-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#331574: FTBFS: Cannot copy terminfo files
Package: debian-installer-utils Version: 1.08 Severity: serious debian-installer-utils fails to build because it cannot copy some terminfo files: for file in /etc/terminfo/a/ansi /etc/terminfo/l/linux \ /etc/terminfo/v/vt102; do \ mkdir -p debian/di-utils-terminfo/`dirname $file`; \ cp -a $file debian/di-utils-terminfo/$file; \ done cp: cannot stat `/etc/terminfo/a/ansi': No such file or directory cp: cannot stat `/etc/terminfo/l/linux': No such file or directory cp: cannot stat `/etc/terminfo/v/vt102': No such file or directory This was fixed in version 1.12. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330558: tags 330558 - experimental
tags 330558 - experimental thanks This bug applies to the version in unstable, so I'm removing the experimental tag. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#331080: FTBFS: Error checking examples
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:49:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 30 September 2005 at 13:34, Matt Kraai wrote: | Package: boot | Version: 1.2.23-1 | Severity: serious | | boot fails to build: | | * checking examples ... ERROR | Running examples in boot-Ex.R failed. | The error most likely occurred in: Which platform is that, Matt? I disabled a few of these tests on other packages formerly provided by r-recommended, and I guess I need to disable it here too. This was on i386. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tags 330558 - experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 330558 - experimental Bug#330558: dbus: monodoc missing in build-dependencies Tags were: experimental Tags removed: experimental thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331080: FTBFS: Error checking examples
On 3 October 2005 at 08:07, Matt Kraai wrote: | On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:49:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 30 September 2005 at 13:34, Matt Kraai wrote: | | Package: boot | | Version: 1.2.23-1 | | Severity: serious | | | | boot fails to build: | | | | * checking examples ... ERROR | | Running examples in boot-Ex.R failed. | | The error most likely occurred in: | | Which platform is that, Matt? | | I disabled a few of these tests on other packages formerly provided by | r-recommended, and I guess I need to disable it here too. | | This was on i386. Odd, so how does that square with my pbuilder logs showing that it built just fine? - [...] dh_installdirs usr/lib/R/library mkdir debian/boot find . -not -path ./debian* | cpio -p -m debian/boot 938 blocks (cd debian \ R CMD check --no-latex boot \ R CMD INSTALL -l /tmp/buildd/boot-1.2.23/debian/r-cran-boot/usr/lib/R/library boot \ rm -rf boot ) * using log directory '/tmp/buildd/boot-1.2.23/debian/boot.Rcheck' * using R version 2.1.1, 2005-06-20 * checking for file 'boot/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * this is package 'boot' version '1.2-23' * checking if this is a source package ... OK * checking whether package 'boot' can be installed ... OK * checking package directory ... OK * checking for portable file names ... OK * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK * checking package dependencies ... OK * checking index information ... OK * checking package subdirectories ... OK * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK * checking R files for library.dynam ... OK * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK * checking replacement functions ... OK * checking foreign function calls ... OK * checking Rd files ... OK * checking for missing documentation entries ... OK * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK * checking Rd \usage sections ... OK * creating boot-Ex.R ... OK * checking examples ... OK * Installing *source* package 'boot' ... [...] - Any thought? Dirk -- Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty. -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330288: beagle eats gigabytes of memory
Beagle does indeed use as much resident memory as is available, and the behavious is for the kernel to swap everything else out, esentially killing the system (beagle seems to be pretty reluctant to free that memory back up). I've been running the beagled daemon from a ulimit-ed shell, and it's behaving fine (beagle seems to be hanging just under the limit at all times). Starting the daemon with a memory limit by default might be a good workaround until beagle itself gets sorted out.
Bug#331601: python-soappy: python 2.4 is not the default in debian's python-defaults yet. please do not depend on python = 2.4
Package: python-soappy Version: 0.11.3-1.2 Severity: serious The python 2.3 - 2.4 transition hasn't started yet for debian. If you are using ubuntu, please build in a debian sid pbuilder chroot. python-soappy dependencies are like this: --\ Depends --- python (= 2.4) (UNAVAILABLE) --- python ( 2.4+1) --- python2.4-soappy (UNSATISFIED) they should be like this: --\ Depends --- python (= 2.3) --- python ( 2.3+1) --- python2.3-soappy -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#326008: #326008: apt-listbugs fails with deadlock
Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.0.49 Followup-For: Bug #326008 For me, it doesn't deadlock but it never actually downloads the bug reports eventually it will timeout with this error: getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution: then the name of the package... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on: ii apt 0.6.41 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii libdpkg-ruby1.8 0.3.1 modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1 ii libintl-gettext-ruby1.8 0.11-5 Gettext wrapper for Ruby 1.8 ii libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8] 1.8.3-1Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1. ii libxml-parser-ruby1.8 0.6.8-1Interface of expat for the scripti ii ruby 1.8.2-1An interpreter of object-oriented apt-listbugs recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330851: pxe: immediate segfault when started
FYI, the program segfaults when compiled with gcc = 4.0. If you try compiling the source package with gcc-3.3, pxe works again and doesn't segfault anymore. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331080: FTBFS: Error checking examples
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:37:05PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 3 October 2005 at 08:07, Matt Kraai wrote: | On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:49:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 30 September 2005 at 13:34, Matt Kraai wrote: | | Package: boot | | Version: 1.2.23-1 | | Severity: serious | | | | boot fails to build: | | | | * checking examples ... ERROR | | Running examples in boot-Ex.R failed. | | The error most likely occurred in: | | Which platform is that, Matt? | | I disabled a few of these tests on other packages formerly provided by | r-recommended, and I guess I need to disable it here too. | | This was on i386. Odd, so how does that square with my pbuilder logs showing that it built just fine? I don't know. I'll make sure that I can reproduce the problem tomorrow and, if I can, send you the list of packages that were used in the build environment. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#331574: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot copy terminfo files)
Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2005 21:55:57 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331574: FTBFS: Cannot copy terminfo files has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 03:21:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 20:21:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMdMq-0006is-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 20:21:24 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j943LKBa047783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 20:21:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EMXf0-0001ZB-Lq for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:15:46 -0700 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:15:46 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Cannot copy terminfo files Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1109/Mon Oct 3 15:06:28 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: debian-installer-utils Version: 1.08 Severity: serious debian-installer-utils fails to build because it cannot copy some terminfo files: for file in /etc/terminfo/a/ansi /etc/terminfo/l/linux \ /etc/terminfo/v/vt102; do \ mkdir -p debian/di-utils-terminfo/`dirname $file`; \ cp -a $file debian/di-utils-terminfo/$file; \ done cp: cannot stat `/etc/terminfo/a/ansi': No such file or directory cp: cannot stat `/etc/terminfo/l/linux': No such file or directory cp: cannot stat `/etc/terminfo/v/vt102': No such file or directory This was fixed in version 1.12. --=20 Matt --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDQZ+CfNdgYxVXvBARAuBOAJ9xH/qNl3u5+6F+G9H4t2ovYI/BrQCgoe8f dG31STlHS19RsjE0So+q7d0= =tN82 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf-- --- Received: (at 331574-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 04:56:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 21:56:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMeqU-0004Yb-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 21:56:06 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j944u4ZV049610 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 21:56:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EMeqL-0002hX-TW for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 21:55:58 -0700 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 21:55:57 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#331574: FTBFS: Cannot copy terminfo files Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1109/Mon Oct 3 15:06:28 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp)
Bug#330827: IP vetting is weak, allowing targetted DoS via usernames
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:24:09PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Besides that regular users or sysadmins are not even supposed to tune failregex to have basic functionality to be performed. Me (and the upstream) author are going to incorporate or at least include in the package more of the configurations for different servers (imap, smtp, etc). Perhaps, but maybe i'm maintaining my own ssh, or I add an additional service not managed by debian. Admittedly I'd really like to have it just work and not think about it too much. Is this a reasonable approach? 1) Regex which identifies a false login. This can be as simple as before. If someone logs in as illegal user to create a false positive, so be it. 2) Second pattern which simply identifies the IP address component of the line. Well - that is how it was done before, and lead to the security breach. What was done before was the line was scanned for anything which resembles an IP address. What I am suggesting is a regex which specifies where in the line the IP address should be. I am assuming that these errors place the IP address in an obvious and known location, and that seperating this scan from the identification of the lines with the error will simplify such a regex. This assumption might be wrong. -josh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328350: gdk-pixbuf should be ready to go
It should now be possible to build gdk-pixbuf, with a Build-Depends on libpng12-dev and libgnome-dev (= 1.4.2-24), and upload. Please let me know if there's anything I've missed that makes that not possible. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
