Since upgrading to udev, i'm having simuliar issues. It seems that the
nvidia_agp module isn't being loaded. Manually loading this module
fixed the problem with xorg not starting.. or display a black screen.
I've attached a log of what xorg said in it's log when the module wasn't
loaded
ii
There's a slightly more thorough patch for slang2 from Ubuntu,
at http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/asciijump/ in the _packaging patch.
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This space intentionally left blank.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, October 26, 2005 23:30, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Another security problem has been found in mantis. Insufficient
input sanitising of the t_core_path parameter may be exploited to perform
arbitrary file inclusion. Please see
http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-46/advisory/ for
On Oct 27, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no serialization, only some throttling (IIRC it tries to run up
to 10 child processes in parallel).
Ok, but it runs modprobe, not ismod, right?
Yes.
As Rusty suggested I wrapped /sbin/modprobe in a logger script, but so
far I have not
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.001
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
first up sorry if this is known, it only manifests in 10.001,
I built (and uploaded) linux-2.6-2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4 for i386,
using 9.008.4, the version in sid.
I've appended a
* Kai Hendry:
On 2005-10-26T00:40-0700 Matt Mullenweg wrote:
I need a Wordpress release with the updated Snoopy version 1.2.1. ASAP.
Could you confirm this affects WP? We use an older version of Snoopy
that has been modified, and the only calls to it are hard-coded RSS
feeds, so I don't
Package: drip
Version: 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-7
Followup-For: Bug #335958
Same here:
% drip ; echo $?
Segmentation fault
139
(C. Thomas suggestion for downgrading results in a working 'drip' though.)
HTH...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2005 01:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335976: fixed in nvidia-kernel-common 20051026+1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 335958 serious
Bug#335958: drip segfaults
Severity set to `serious'.
severity 304109 serious
Bug#304109: Linuking glib both 1.2 and 2.0,segfaults.
Severity set to `serious'.
merge 335958 304109
Bug#304109: Linuking glib both 1.2 and
Package: flyspray
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Multiple Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilties have been found in
Flyspray. Have a look at
http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2005/10/flyspray-bug-killer-multiple-variable.html
for more details. This has been assigned
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Another security problem has been found in mantis. Insufficient
input sanitising of the t_core_path parameter may be exploited to perform
arbitrary file inclusion. Please see
http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-46/advisory/ for details.
Hello Moritz,
Thank
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 332859 + fixed
Bug#332859: libpstoedit0: Needs C++ ABI transition (really!)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Ok, I tested
ii linux-image-2.6.14-rc5-686 2.6.13+2.6.14-rc5-0experimental.1 Linux
kernel 2.6.14 image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/P4 machines
and not only I get the same error but continues a little bit. It adds,
BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Pid: 1, comm: Swapper
and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 315059 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#315059: heimdal: Kerberos 4 support should be dropped
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
tag 334632 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#334632: FTBFS: Crypto library used by krb4 lacks features
tags 326581 patch
thanks
I hope people aren't holding out for a fix for glibc to build with gcc-4.0
on hppa, here; this bug seems to be affecting not just python builds but
also perl builds, which holds up roughly all of testing:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 326581 patch
Bug#326581: [hppa] glibc-2.3.5 let's python builds FTBFS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
**
Build finished at 20051027-0743
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
directory `/build/buildd/amaya-9.2.1/Amaya/WX'
make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20051027-0358
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
severity 335981 serious
Bug#335981: scm: FTBFS on s390 (failure in gc)
Severity set to `serious'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Thu, October 27, 2005 11:26, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
I assume you've prepared packages of 0.19.3?
This would address the SQL injection issue and the other XSS in
view_all_set as well, which are both not yet in the BTS.
Yes, I have.
Thijs
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.41-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/java-gcj-compat-1.0.41'
gcj-4.0 -C
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:55:53AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
I incorporated Lennert's suggestion and created a patch that fixes the
problem on at least i386.
It seems like you've missed two more places in debian/rules2:
ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),linux)
ifeq
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 10:18:45PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Please find a full log of my build on crest as an attachement.
I put the wrong file as an attachment and I apologize for that.
Please find a full log of my build on crest as an attachement.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package mantis
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mantis
tags 330682 pending
Bug#330682: mantis: Several vulnerabilities in Mantis
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
tags 335938 pending
Bug#335938: mantis: Mantis t_core_path File Inclusion
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:18:45 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335874: grep_2.5.1.ds2-2(m68k/unstable/thing2): FTBFS on
m68k
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Package: ace
Version: 5.4.7-5
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of ace_5.4.7-5 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
g++-3.4 -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -O3 -pipe -D_REENTRANT -DACE_HAS_AIO_CALLS
-D_GNU_SOURCE -DACE_HAS_SYS_SIGLIST=1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 335950 normal
Bug#335950: install cannot figure out how to install no cdrom found
Severity set to `normal'.
reassign 335950 installation-reports
Bug#335950: install cannot figure out how to install no cdrom found
Bug reassigned from package
severity 335950 normal
reassign 335950 installation-reports
thanks
On Thursday 27 October 2005 00:32, Kenneth Gessner wrote:
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Again the severity is inflated. How can it break the system if there is no
system installed?
cannot install
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Another security problem has been found in mantis. Insufficient
input sanitising of the t_core_path parameter may be exploited to perform
arbitrary file inclusion. Please see
http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-46/advisory/ for
On Thu, October 27, 2005 14:56, Martin Schulze wrote:
I assume you've prepared packages of 0.19.3?
This would address the SQL injection issue and the other XSS in
view_all_set as well, which are both not yet in the BTS.
The latest issues have been assigned CVE-2005-333[6789], BTW.
Do you
Hello
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:25:14PM +0200, Marcel Aguilella Arzo wrote:
Same problem with tightvncserver without arguments, and yes , I have
used tightvncserver for long without problem in the same computer
using debian-testing for ia32.
Also I tried to uncomment the line:
Martin Schulze wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Another security problem has been found in mantis. Insufficient
input sanitising of the t_core_path parameter may be exploited to
perform
arbitrary file inclusion. Please see
http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-46/advisory/
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:14:47AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to reproduce this, but I can't. Everything
seems to be working perfectly for me.
Can someone please try to explain me how I should reproduce the
error?
do you by chance have zlib1g-dev installed on your
severity 335968 important
stop
This bug has been downgraded to important as it only seems to affect
some machines. It doesn't crash on my workstation (athlon; linux
2.6.11.7) but does crash on my laptop (pentium M; crashes under linux
2.6.14-rc5 and 2.6.9). Both machines are running the latest
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
notfound 335627 0.9-a3-2
Bug#335627: FTBFS: Link destination is a directory
Bug marked as not found in version 0.9-a3-2.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 335968 important
Bug#335968: gramps: Segmentation fault
Severity set to `important'.
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Package: usbutils
Version: 0.71-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The upstream location of the package points to
http://usb.cs.tum.edu/download/usbutils/. However, since around version
0.11, the correct address should be either http://www.linux-usb.org/ or
(if direct download link is
Package: epos
Version: 1:2.5.36-1
Severity: grave
From your postrm:
if test $1 = purge; then
update-rc.d epos remove /dev/null
rm -rf /var/log/epos
if id -u $USER_NAME /dev/null 21; then
deluser --quiet --remove-home $USER_NAME
fi
fi
deluser is from adduser, a non-essential
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
# upstream URLs are not RC
severity 336039 important
Bug#336039: Incorrect upstream download address in
/usr/share/doc/usbutils/copyright
Severity set to `important'.
End of
Package: araneida
Version: 0.9-a3-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
First,I'm very happy after I saw some lisp files appeared in
/usr/share/common-lisp/source/araneida.
Second, I still cannot load it correctly :)
And I also find the problem:
In araneida.asd files, there're some code seems that it needed
A.T.T.
Now I can build this package my self correctly, so this bug should be
marked as 'resolved'.
Thanks.
--
(setq reply-to
(concatenate 'string Binghe tianchunbinghe '(#\@) gmail.com))
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: amaya
Version: 9.2.1-4
Severity: serious
From the alpha build log:
g++ -O2 -Wall -x c++ -D__cplusplus -D_UNIX -D_GL -D_WX -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I..
-I../../amaya/xpm -I../../thotlib/include -I../../thotlib/internals/var
-I../../thotlib/internals/h -I../../thotlib/internals/f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes -
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:26:44PM +0200, Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:14:47AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to reproduce this, but I can't. Everything
seems to be working perfectly for me.
Can someone please try to explain me how I should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes -
Package: gcc-2.95
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Now that gcc 4.0 is the default system compiler, gcc-2.95 ftbfs on
arm due to an 'invalid lvalue in assignment'. The attached patch
fixes this issue.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 335577 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115210
Bug#335577: k3b freeze KDE and crashe
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115210.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:32:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330604: fixed in inkscape 0.42.2+0.43pre1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Kurt Roeckx wrote, On 27/10/05 13:32:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:01:19PM -0300, Lucas Di Pentima wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
The hosts program does not run on the same host, so it should
work for every arch? Or is the host program something you need
to download, and only exists for a few
On 10/27/05, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Sorry for taking so long, I actually made a new
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Shoot, I must have missed the bugreport. I see that it is again the
libmagick mess, let's hope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Just rebuilding with adjusted build-dependencies does not solve this bug.
It FTBFS with:
gcc -fPIC -Wall -g -I. -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux
- -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux
- -I/home/luk/tmp/librmagick-ruby-1.9.0/ext/RMagick
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:04:00PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
When you've made that upload, please reassign this bug to to ftp.debian.org
so that the mipsel bindings of subversion as they are in the archive now
can be dropped.
Done now anyway (the removal), though this bug mistakenly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes -
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Michael Fedrowitz told:
[...]
do you by chance have zlib1g-dev installed on your system? The problem
here is (as has been pointed out previously somewhere in this bug log)
that something tries to load libz.so for some reason, which only fails
if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 336082 ipw2100-source: does not build against recent ieee80211
Bug#336082: ipw2100-source: version 1.1.2-3 fails to compile against 2.6.12-10
(struct ieee80211_hdr problems)
Changed Bug title.
severity 336082 grave
Bug#336082: ipw2100-source:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
package grub grub-disk grub-doc
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: grub grub-doc grub-disk
tags 261936 + pending
Bug#261936: Patch to grub to make update-grub detect and handle splash
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 335980 serious
Bug#335980: scm: FTBFS on ia64 (segment violation 11 when testing continuations)
Severity set to `serious'.
severity 335982 serious
Bug#335982: scm: FTBFS on arm (failure when testing delay and force)
Severity set to `serious'.
Please upload your Build-Depends to depend on libmagick++9-dev |
libmagick++-dev instead of libmagick++6-dev
I indeed missed the bugreport and found it in my mailbox just now. I am
willing to submit it myself, but as I mentioned before, you are welcome
for the NMU.
--
greetz, marc
Next time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package apt-src
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: apt-src
severity 336083 grave
Bug#336083: apt-src: Fails to install a package
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 336083 335211
Bug#335211: apt-src install segfaults
Bug#336083: apt-src: Fails to install a
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:31:43 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line security issue is already fixed in unstable ... go to testing!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Hi,
It fails in the Perl interface to apt (AptPkg/Source.pm); at a
simple(?) variable set. If I remove the set, then it runs correctly.
Will try to hunt it down.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: saods9
Severity: serious
Justification: violates the spirit of the DFSG
Tags: upstream
File: ./sla/
My package saods9 includes code from slalib (./saotk/hal/ in v3, ./sla/
in v4), in obscured form only. I've been in contact with Bill Joye
upstream, having requested the inclusion of real
* Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-26 11:02]:
what's up with jed bug #324982? Adding to the FTBFS I notice that jed
is also uninstallable in unstable. Do you plan to do something about
it? Do you want an NMU or is there a sponsored upload of a fix? I use
jed daily and would be glad
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:26:44PM +0200, Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:14:47AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to reproduce this, but I can't. Everything
seems to be working perfectly for me.
Can someone please try to explain me how I should
Hello Florian,
Florian Weimer wrote:
Package: chmlib
Version: 0.36-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Advisory: chmlib exploitable buffer overflow
Product: chmlib
Affected Version: =0.36
Immune Version: 0.36
OS: Tested on linux 2.4 probably other OS affected as well
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 335214 335927
Bug#335214: gnome-vfs2: FTBFS: smb-method.c:1489: error: 'struct _SMBCCTX' has
no member named 'close'
Bug#335927: FTBFS with libsmbclient-dev 3.0.20b-2
Merged 335214 335927.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 336098 confirmed
Bug#336098: saods9: obscured source code
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: confirmed
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 332452 + fixed
Bug#332452: FTBFS: libmagick++ transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
reassign 332827 digikamimageplugins
Bug#332827: digikam: Missing Depends on libsqlite3-dev
Bug reassigned from package `digikam' to `digikamimageplugins'.
End of message, stopping
Can you try this patch and test if it work? I do not have a etch/sid
machine to test it on myself. :(
i just used my ltsp chroot/qemu environment :)
I suspect I forgot to adjust some parts of xdebconfigurator to do the
right thing with xorg. The xfree86 stript is used quite a lot all
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.0.2-3
Severity: grave
A kdebase built with gcc/libstdc++6 4.0.1-8 is not compatible with a kdebase
built with 4.0.1-9 or later. The result are crashes like #335658, unless
(in that case) arts is rebuilt with 4.0.1-9+, in which case the problem
disappears.
Package: cycle
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: grave
The program does not start at all:
$ cycle
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/cycle, line 199, in ?
app = MyApp(0)
File
/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/wx-2.6-gtk2-unicode/wx/_core.py, line
7473, in __init__
Package: kionjb
Version: 0.1.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
kionjb misses a dependency on libusb, even though it was compiled
against it. This is caused by the following error:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find any packages for
/usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4 (libusb-0.1.so.4)
Package: amarok
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
while running amarok, my KDE session will end suddenly, bringing me back
to the gui login screen (same effect as pressing CTRL-ALT-Backspace).
This seems to happen without much warning, but more often when
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:24:13AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
I'm wondering whether the last four months have provided enough time to
confirm this is still a bug deserving of the grave status. Because of
this bug, geomview has been removed from testing, which nearly derailed
package: libvideo-capture-v4l-perl
version: 0.224-5
severity: serious
This package is non-free. The README file says this:
--
License+Disclaimer
==
This code is distributed under GPLv2 (in other words, do what you like with
it, but don't sell it, and give credit if you use it).
Package: kernel-image-netbootable
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Version: 0.7.0b-2
due to debian bug:
#335254: initrd-netboot-tools: incompatible with linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
version 0.7.0b-2 of kernel-image-netbootable is unusable, as it only
depends on kernels that
Hi,
It appears that the failure to created /dev/hd* devices is a simple timing
issue. If I change 'sleep 2' to 'sleep 20' right after udevsynthesize
call on line 77 in init, then the devices are created fine and root disk
is mounted. However, it still fails to complete the boot with the
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:07:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line problem solved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: linuxsampler
Version: 0.3.cvs20050715+3-1
Severity: serious
pbuilder fails to build linuxsampler in an unstable chroot on i386:
if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile i486-linux-gnu-g++
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../..-Wreturn-type -ffast-math -Wall -g
-fPIC -O2
severity 336133 important
thanks
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 10:29:04PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
package: libvideo-capture-v4l-perl
version: 0.224-5
severity: serious
This package is non-free. The README file says this:
--
License+Disclaimer
==
This code is distributed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 336133 important
Bug#336133: libvideo-capture-v4l-perl is non-free
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
package: awstats
severity: grave
tags: security
Version 6.4-1.1 which fixed CAN-2005-152 on Sept 4, 2005 is still not
available in the stable branch as of October 28, 2005.
Running 'apt-get update apt-get upgrade' on Debian 3.1 does not yet
fix CAN-2005-152 which was fixed roughly 2 months
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:40:49 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line mapserver: FTBFS on hppa
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
89 matches
Mail list logo
