Bug#297789: updated patch
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:22:26PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: find an updated patch attached. How much longer should I wait for the latest and and most updated patch? and what specifically makes this a policy violation and/or release critical bug (thereby justifying serious, and threatening NMU?) lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363154: xprint: Xprint fails to start and makes X stop
Drew Parsons wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 23:13 +0200, Laurent CARON wrote: Package: xprint Version: Xprint fails to start Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Xprint is broken after last sid update Hi Laurent, did you use reportbug to make this report? Normally it provides the version of the package you're reporting against, but it's missing this time for some reason. Can you tell me what version of xprint you're referring to? Drew Hi, My mistake xprint has been removed by some other broken dependency on SID. sorry for the noise :$. Laurent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297789: updated patch
Hello, On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:15:29AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: How much longer should I wait for the latest and and most updated patch? I was not aware you where waiting for an updated patch since one year (or two, counting the other bug which contained code to activate rdev, too). and what specifically makes this a policy violation and/or release critical bug (thereby justifying serious, and threatening NMU?) rdev missing on amd64 since 1 year. Maybe serious is a too hgh priority, but it is at least important, and the NMU would have been a porter NMU. Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#356918: marked as done (libx11: FTBFS in experimental.)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:21:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line libx11: FTBFS in experimental. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libx11 Version: 1:1.0.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: serious Hi, Your package is still failing to build. First I get: checking for XKBPROTO... configure: error: Package requirements (kbproto inputproto) were not met: No package 'inputproto' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables XKBPROTO_CFLAGS and XKBPROTO_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 Which seems to be a missing build dependency on x11proto-input-dev. Then I get: Making all in ru_RU.UTF-8 make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/libx11-1.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/nls/ru_RU.UTF-8' make[3]: *** No rule to make target `XI18N_OBJS', needed by `all-am'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libx11-1.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/nls/ru_RU.UTF-8' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 I wonder why I didn't get any of those errors the previous time though. Kurt ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 2:1.0.0-6 libx11 2:1.0.0-6 is built on all archs, so clearly this bug no longer applies; closing. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#297789: updated patch
severity 297789 important thanks On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:25:53AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:15:29AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: How much longer should I wait for the latest and and most updated patch? I was not aware you where waiting for an updated patch since one year (or two, counting the other bug which contained code to activate rdev, too). and what specifically makes this a policy violation and/or release critical bug (thereby justifying serious, and threatening NMU?) rdev missing on amd64 since 1 year. Maybe serious is a too hgh priority, but it is at least important, and the NMU would have been a porter NMU. If you can't point to a specific reason this should be serious, then yes, it's too high. I think it's been the better part of a decade since the last time I needed to use rdev; hardly seems worth a porter NMU IMHO. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of xkb-data-legacy 1.0.1-4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 362099 + fixed Bug#362099: xkb-data-legacy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362099: marked as done (xkb-data-legacy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:00:54 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in NMU of xkb-data-legacy 1.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xkb-data-legacy Version: 1.0.1-3 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for xkbcomp... not_found configure: error: xkbcomp is required to install the xkb data files make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 -- Daniel Schepler ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.0.1-4 tags 3692099 -fixed Given that this package was built out of XSF svn using the diff David had already prepared, it ought to be marked as closed rather than fixed; the upload was labelled as an NMU because I'm not listed as an Uploader for xkb-data-legacy. David, let me know how you would prefer that I handle these going forward; I don't intend to add myself as an uploader to any packages without your approval, I uploaded in this case merely because the RC bugfix apparently got overlooked after being committed to svn. The changelog entry from the upload follows. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ Description: xkb-data-legacy - Classic XKB data Closes: 362099 Changes: xkb-data-legacy (1.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=low . [ David Nusinow ] * Add xbase-clients to build-depends in order to get xkbcomp. Thanks Daniel Schepler. (closes: #362099) . [ Steve Langasek ] * Also add quilt to the build-deps, so that patches are applied correctly at build time instead of being silently dropped. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Processed: Re: Bug#297789: updated patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 297789 important Bug#297789: util-linux: please provide rdev executable for amd64 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362192: bus error in autogsdoc on some architectures
Hi, I was able to track this failure down to /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Tools/gdnc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Tools/gdnc Bus error [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ After rebuilding gnustep-base with debugging symbols, gdb produced the following stack trace: (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Tools/gdnc [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 16384 (LWP 20997)] Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 20997)] 0x701f8bfc in -[GSTimeZone initWithName:data:] (self=0x836b8, _cmd=0x7036c508, name=0x7df48, data=value optimized out) at NSTimeZone.m:2333 2333 types[i].offset = decode(ptr-offset); (gdb) bt #0 0x701f8bfc in -[GSTimeZone initWithName:data:] (self=0x836b8, _cmd=0x7036c508, name=0x7df48, data=value optimized out) at NSTimeZone.m:2333 #1 0x701f46e8 in -[GSPlaceholderTimeZone initWithName:data:] (self=0x36530, _cmd=0x7036c508, name=0x7df48, data=0x7edc0) at NSTimeZone.m:442 #2 0x701f7848 in -[NSTimeZone initWithName:] (self=0x36530, _cmd=0x7036c6a8, name=0x7df48) at NSTimeZone.m:1511 #3 0x701f6b30 in +[NSTimeZone systemTimeZone] (self=value optimized out, _cmd=0x7036c640) at NSTimeZone.m:1304 #4 0x701f6668 in +[NSTimeZone defaultTimeZone] (self=0x7036cca4, _cmd=0x7036c518) at NSTimeZone.m:1054 #5 0x701f5028 in -[NSLocalTimeZone secondsFromGMTForDate:] (self=0x3cbb0, _cmd=0x70337d98, aDate=0x79c40) at NSTimeZone.m:525 #6 0x70114c30 in -[NSCalendarDate descriptionWithCalendarFormat:locale:] (self=0x79c40, _cmd=0x70337ee8, format=0x703524f4, locale=0x0) at NSCalendarDate.m:117 #7 0x701109b8 in -[NSCalendarDate descriptionWithCalendarFormat:] (self=0x79c40, _cmd=0x70352458, format=0x703524f4) at NSCalendarDate.m:1632 #8 0x7018ccd8 in NSLogv (format=0x70372e54, args=0xefd87668) at NSLog.m:331 #9 0x7018d0a8 in NSLog (format=0x70372e54) at NSLog.m:252 #10 0x7020ad8c in -[NSUserDefaults readDefaults] (self=0x70b30, _cmd=0x7037245c) at NSUserDefaults.m:1488 #11 0x7020af54 in -[NSUserDefaults synchronize] (self=0x70b30, _cmd=0x70372104) at NSUserDefaults.m:1613 #12 0x702082c0 in -[NSUserDefaults initWithContentsOfFile:] () at NSUserDefaults.m:840 #13 0x70207fd8 in -[NSUserDefaults initWithUser:] (self=0x70b30, _cmd=0x70372244, userName=0x72698) at NSUserDefaults.m:762 ---Type return to continue, or q return to quit--- #14 0x70207d80 in -[NSUserDefaults init] (self=0x70b30, _cmd=0x70372174) at NSUserDefaults.m:702 #15 0x70207070 in +[NSUserDefaults standardUserDefaults] (self=0x703724e4, _cmd=0x263c4) at NSUserDefaults.m:462 #16 0x0001442c in main (argc=1, argv=0xefd87a84, env=0xefd87a8c) at gdnc.m:1064 (gdb) Hope it helps, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363061: Implicit granting of rights? (was: Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free)
Hi debian-legal, Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 15:14 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: , | %%% Copyright (C) 1994 Aloysius G. Helminck. All rights reserved. | %%% Permission is granted to to customize the declarations in this | %%% file to serve the needs of your installation. However, no permission | %%% is granted to distribute a modified version of this file under | %%% its original name. ` That would be just on the right side of the border set by DFSG #4 (note that it's a TeX input file, so it is both source and used form), but But it doesn't even allow use - don't know whether this is implicitly granted? I would vote for implicitly granted usage rights, but IANAL. Can we in fact assume such implicit granting of rights? It seems logic to me, because there are no needs of your installation if all I may do is meditate over the contents of the file. But I'm not sure whether what seems logic to me is logic in IP law... TIA, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
Processed: Re: Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363059 normal Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives. Severity set to `normal'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fd files in the same directory don't have any copyright or license
statement at all; don't know whether they need one.
Even worse, they contain the statement:
%Filename: whatever
%Created by: tex fontplcm
%Created using fontinst v1.335
But there's no file fontplcm anywhere, only
ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/fonts/psfonts/psnfss-source/mathpple/fontplcme.tex
(note the additional e) which doesn't seem to be related.
And I don't know whether this package is still useful today at all...
I don't think so. There are better ways to get math for palatino. T1
encoding is not supported. I guess these files are only in there for
compatibility with (really) old documents.
texlive doesn't have that relict.
BTW, the way these files are arranged in different directories is really
odd:
STY and FD in TEXMF/tex/latex/palatcm
TFM and VF in TEXMF/fonts/{tfm,vf}/adobe/mathppl/
However, in TEXMF/tex/latex/mathpple (note the 'e'), there are old FD
files for getting Helvetica scaled to 95%, while mathpple.sty is an
obsolete styfile from PSNFSS located in TEXMF/tex/latex/psnfss. I don't
claim to understand this mess.
Do you know if that mess originates from the CTAN locations, or is it
only in teTeX?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Bug#363265: crystalcursors: Should either depend on some xorg 7 or conflict with xorg 7
Package: crystalcursors Version: 1.1.1-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package will not work with the current xorg in testing or the xfree in sarge. It should have either a depend or a conflict. This might be a normal bug under normal circumstances, but crystalcursors will probably be rc-bug-free and ready to move to testing a long time before the modular X is ready for testing, so this will be broken in testing. Making it RC to prevent migration. /Sune -- System Information: Debian Release: unstable/experimental APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages crystalcursors depends on: ii xlibs-data1:7.0.10 transitional package for X11 clien crystalcursors recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 362099
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.17 tags 362099 - fixed Bug#362099: xkb-data-legacy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Tags were: fixed Tags removed: fixed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363059 grave Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives. Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363059 grave Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives. Severity set to `grave'. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#356330: Fixed in NMU of libosip2 2.2.2-2.1
Le Mar 18 Avril 2006 05:43, Anand Kumria a écrit : tag 328825 - fixed tag 352251 - fixed tag 356330 - fixed thanks, I'm reverting your NMU. You made a mistake -- in debian/copyright -- since you felt your changes were urgent enough to warrant no review time, I'm reverting them straight away. Anand and I understand that you canceled the NMU, but please dont trash the whole diff away, it addresses a lot of problems that are old or RC on the BTS (don't be suprised to be NMU-ed with a 30 days old RC bug on your package), and the other are RC packaging problems: - having debian/*.ex files is RC (ftp master refuses packages that have those). - my debian/copyright is maybe wrong (but I really need a clarification on this, so that I don't do the same mistake twice, please tell me) but yours is clearly incomplete (this is also RC) Having both .install and .files files is confusing enough to deserve an important bug. Same is for the non used anymore debian/libosip2.* osip.1 beeing distrubuted upstream and not in the package is also clumsy. the rest (DH_COMPAT to 5, Standars-Version to 3.6.2) is just coemecitc. So I really hope you will include in your next (coming ?) upload most of the changes I did. Else I will open bugs to ask them to be fixed. Best regards, -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpEHbsZDdclX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#363030: aegis: FTBFS with pbuilder on i386
Hi, Steve Langasek wrote: aegis: user root too privileged This seems to indicate that you were running the build target as root, correct? That doesn't sound release-critical to me, given that the autobuilders will never run the build target this way. There seems to be something wrong in the detection of the root user. pbuilder runs the build target as a user (here: ernie, I inserted a whoami into debian/rules), but aegis says user root too privileged: [...] make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/aegis-4.21' touch debian/stamp-makefile-build DEB_MAKE_CHECK_TARGET unset, not running checks whoami ernie /usr/bin/make -C . sure make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/aegis-4.21' CXX=g++ /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \ test/00/t0001a.sh test/00/t0001a.ES PASSED CXX=g++ /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \ test/00/t0002a.sh test/00/t0002a.ES 18c18 who = USER; --- who = ernie; 23c23 who = USER; --- who = ernie; 43c43 USER, --- ernie, FAILED test of core functionality (new project 151) CXX=g++ /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \ test/00/t0003a.sh test/00/t0003a.ES PASSED CXX=g++ /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \ test/00/t0004a.sh test/00/t0004a.ES aegis: warning: test mode aegis: user root too privileged [...] bye, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363128: marked as done (cps-site: postinst failure (UnboundLocalError in dzhandle))
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:17:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#363128: fixed in zope-common 0.5.23 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: cps-site Version: 3.4.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: Setting up cps-site (3.4.0-1) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/sbin/dzhandle, line 2272, in ? main() File /usr/sbin/dzhandle, line 2263, in main if action.check_args(global_options): File /usr/sbin/dzhandle, line 951, in check_args self.locatedaddons = locate_addons(self.addonClass, zopeversions=global_options.zversion) File /usr/sbin/dzhandle, line 2097, in locate_addons if zver: UnboundLocalError: local variable 'zver' referenced before assignment dpkg: error processing cps-site (--configure): -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages cps-site depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.72 Debian configuration management sy ii zope-common 0.5.22 common settings and scripts for zo ii zope-cps 3.4.0-1extensive collaborative web conten ii zope2.9 2.9.2-1Open Source Web Application Server cps-site recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * cps-site/instance-http-port: 8082 * cps-site/admin-automatic-password: cps-site/internal: * cps-site/admin-user: admin * cps-site/keep-data-on-purge: false ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: zope-common Source-Version: 0.5.23 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zope-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: zope-common_0.5.23.dsc to pool/main/z/zope-common/zope-common_0.5.23.dsc zope-common_0.5.23.tar.gz to pool/main/z/zope-common/zope-common_0.5.23.tar.gz zope-common_0.5.23_all.deb to pool/main/z/zope-common/zope-common_0.5.23_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated zope-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:55:19 +0200 Source: zope-common Binary: zope-common Architecture: source all Version: 0.5.23 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/Ubuntu Zope Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: zope-common - common settings and scripts for zope installations Closes: 363128 Changes: zope-common (0.5.23) unstable; urgency=low . * dzhandle: fixed a bug in locate_addons method, zver variable is False by default. (Closes: #363128) Files: 41e5dc1a744b62afd587f527e264bd68 740 web optional zope-common_0.5.23.dsc 2276237616cc825cb42dcee18b4277f6 44191 web optional zope-common_0.5.23.tar.gz 4eb66e7500677eb97f188add06be8ead 37648 web optional zope-common_0.5.23_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFERJu7K/juK3+WFWQRAodeAKCSWjbwp13jDmHhxZbPIv+M345+7QCeJLLD rw5b8uKbIvVKwh3ORsx6Jng= =9dt6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#361749: /etc/init.d/shishid doesn't go to background
Pierre THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: shishid Version: 0.0.23-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The shishid script in /etc/init.d doesn't start the daemon in the background, so the server won't be started after installation (you're forced to kill it to let dpkg end it's job). It may also prevent the system from booting (didn't boot until I had it installed). Hi Pierre! Thanks for testing this. Shishid is the most unstable part of shishi, and I haven't tested the Debian packaging of it much. I have found the --background parameter to start-stop-daemon, and believe it will solve this problem. Could you modify the /etc/init.d/shishid file and replace --start with --start --background? Thanks! Index: shishid.init.d === RCS file: /sources/shishi/shishi-debian/shishid.init.d,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- shishid.init.d 10 Mar 2006 08:55:25 - 1.1 +++ shishid.init.d 18 Apr 2006 08:13:37 - 1.2 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #! /bin/sh -# Copyright (C) 2005 Simon Josefsson +# Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 Simon Josefsson # Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, # are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright # notice and this notice are preserved. @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ case $1 in start) echo -n Starting $DESC: start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile /var/run/$NAME.pid \ - --exec $DAEMON -- $DAEMON_OPTS + --background --exec $DAEMON -- $DAEMON_OPTS echo $NAME. ;; stop) @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ case $1 in /var/run/$NAME.pid --exec $DAEMON sleep 1 start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile \ - /var/run/$NAME.pid --exec $DAEMON -- $DAEMON_OPTS + /var/run/$NAME.pid --background --exec $DAEMON -- $DAEMON_OPTS echo $NAME. ;; *) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361775: CVE number
Hi! This has been assigned CVE-2006-1772. Please mention this number in the changelog when you fix this to ease tracking. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#363274: gaim-dbg: empty package
Package: gaim-dbg Severity: grave This packages does not contain any debugging symbol. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: python-codespeak-lib: unsatisfiable dependency on python (= 2.4)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 345383 0.7-svn20050721-3 Bug#345383: python-codespeak-lib: unsatisfiable dependency on python (= 2.4) 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.7-svn20050721-3, send any further explanations to Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363275: emelfm: x11-common 1.0.1-3 conflicts with emelfm
Package: emelfm Version: 0.9.2-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, The latest version of x11-common (1.0.1-3) conflicts with emelfm, for whatever reason. :-( This makes it emelfm uninstallable, from now on. HTH, George B. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (1001, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages emelfm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libglib1.21.2.10-10.1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-18 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 1:1.0.0-3 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxi61:1.0.0-3 X11 Input extension library ii xlibs 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m emelfm recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345383: python-codespeak-lib: unsatisfiable dependency on python (= 2.4)
close 345383 0.7-svn20050721-3 thanks On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 07:34:41PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Package: python-codespeak-lib Version: 0.7-svn20050721-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable python-codespeak-lib has a dependency on python (= 2.4); however, Debian's python metapackage is still versioned 2.3.5-3, rendering the python-codespeak-lib metapackage uninstallable for the time being. Could you please adjust the dependencies to correspond to present-day Debian unstable? Thanks! current package has correct dependencies. closing this bug that is RC and has no reason to exist. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#363277: gnuserv: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'strerror'
Package: gnuserv Version: 3.12.7-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'gnuserv' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: gcc -c -I. -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I -g -O2 gnuclient.c In file included from gnuclient.c:61: ./sysfile.h:395: error: conflicting types for 'strerror' /usr/include/string.h:256: error: previous declaration of 'strerror' was here make[1]: *** [gnuclient.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/gnuserv-3.12.7' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 With the attached patch 'gnuserv' can be compiled on unstable. The patch removes the problematic declaration of strerror from sysfile.h. The strerror function does not seem to be used anywhere in the gnuserv code. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gnuserv-3.12.7/sysfile.h ./sysfile.h --- ../tmp-orig/gnuserv-3.12.7/sysfile.h2004-10-19 08:51:09.0 + +++ ./sysfile.h 2006-04-18 08:24:32.0 + @@ -387,14 +387,6 @@ int dup2 (int oldd, int newd); #endif -#ifndef HAVE_STRERROR -/* X11R6 defines strerror as a macro */ -# ifdef strerror -# undef strerror -# endif -const char *strerror (int); -#endif - /* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362837: fix: recompile
On 2006-04-16 13:39:49 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: For the record: a simple rebuild allowed my CGAL programs to work again. Yes, we had a bug report about the same problem, but not with much details. I already got rid of mpn_sub_nc in the trunk (fixing a potential bug at the same time); the patch will be applied later to the branch. Concerning the __gmp_rand, a patch will probably modify the PRNG. I wonder if this is acceptable (however we don't say anything about the behavior of the PRNG). BTW, I think the use of GMP internals mainly comes from the time MPFR was more or less part of GMP. -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
Bug#362074: Raising the severity again
tags 362074 + pending thanks Awaiting for the new libxp-dev package, after recent xutils-dev fixing. So stay tuned... On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote: severity 362074 serious kthxbye I'm raising the severity of this bug again; it makes xaw3d unusable because applications include X11/Xaw3d/foo.h and this doesn't exist anymore since /usr/include/X11 is no longer a symlink to /usr/X11R6/include/X11... -- -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362885: x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty
#include hallo.h * Steve Langasek [Mon, Apr 17 2006, 08:58:38PM]: On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:51:58AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Steve Langasek [Sun, Apr 16 2006, 04:58:25PM]: If you ask me, I think it's better to keep the vast majority of irritating bugs confined to unstable, and only make users of stable deal with the single issue of moving their files out of /usr/X11R6/bin; which is why I asked David to implement this transition when it became clear that things were breaking because of the move to /usr/bin. I agree with most of your arguments, especially because our default bash PATH is still pointing to /usr/X11R6/bin, but there is one thing which I actually reported... if there is cruft remaining in the directory, the whole upgrade should _not_ break. Implementing an unsafe single rmdir and hope that it won't fail is IMO not a proper solution. If the directory must be moved out of the way, then it should be renamed. Or the old contents need to be moved to the new location, possible correcting symlinks Er, any number of these files may belong to other Debian packages that we don't conflict with (because we didn't know about them). Why would it be ok for a package to mangle files belonging to other packages in this fashion? Okay... If you move the files, dpkg may be unable to find them at package uninstallation, resulting in orphaned files on the filesystem; or there may Not 100% correct. The problem of deinstallation is covered with the symlink workaround since dpkg AFAICS follows the symlinks in the path when removing a file. It's only the other way round that does create headaches, future installations of third-party packages which may try to install files into X11R6/bin and may overwrite files from other packages. I thought a while about that and could not come up with any sane solution, not even hacking dpkg's .list files would help because of missing information. Only blacklisting this directory in dpkg would have been a good solution but it's too late for that. Forcing the user to deal with the conflict is the only safe way of handling files left in /usr/X11R6/bin. It should probably be turned into a debconf note later on, but for the time being I think the current behavior is as good as it's going to get. safe does not mean reliable or usefriendly. I still think that the current lone rmdir hidden in the postinst is not sufficient. What we need is IMO a list of dirty files - files that have existed in Debian in X11R6/bin directory before and which would certainly be uninstalled by apt/dpkg during the upgrade. The debconf's config script should be executed during dpkg-preconfigure (NOTE: not in the middle of upgrade!), scan the existing /usr/X11R6/bin directory, substract the set of dirty files and if there are still remaining files in the list, then the user should be given a chance to abort the whole installation before it starts. And a list of remaining files should be printed. Maybe together with 3rd-party packages that those files may belong to. If you wish me to implement a such solution, please say do it and I will try to. Eduard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#362074: Raising the severity again
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 362074 + pending Bug#362074: Please install to /usr/ instead of /usr/X11R6 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363287: mpfr: FTBFS on s390, illegal instruction in umul_ppmm
Package: mpfr Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hello, MPFR no longer build from source on s390. A complete build log can be found at : http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mpfrver=2.2.0.dfsg.1-5arch=s390stamp=1145312906file=logas=raw I verified with the unmodified source for GMP and MPFR that it is not related to the debian packaging. The `Illegal instruction' or segfault errors occur in umul_ppmm according to gdb (verified on tconst_catalan, tcheck and tmul). I found the following changelog entry, maybe related : 2005-03-22 Patrick Pelissier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] * mul.c: Fix bug on HP-UX. longlong's umul_ppmm seems to be buggy on such a system. Don't use it under HP-UX. I'll try to find a testcase for umul_ppmm to see if we can forward this problem to GMP. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#363288: linm: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libncurses5-dev'
Package: linm Version: 0.7.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'linm' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: checking ncurses.h usability... no checking ncurses.h presence... no checking for ncurses.h... no configure: error: ncurses.h not found. make: *** [config.status] Error 1 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libncurses5-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/linm-0.7.8/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/linm-0.7.8/debian/control 2006-04-17 04:28:30.0 + +++ ./debian/control2006-04-18 09:52:19.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: utils Priority: optional Maintainer: Ki-Heon Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, libncursesw5-dev, libssl-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, libncurses5-dev, libncursesw5-dev, libssl-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: linm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363294: gnutls13 - rebuild looses dep against libtasn1
Package: gnutls13 Version: 1.3.5 Severity: grave A rebuild of gnutls13 looses its dependency against libtasn1 and uses a staticaly linked version instead. Bastian -- Without followers, evil cannot spread. -- Spock, And The Children Shall Lead, stardate 5029.5
Bug#363295: vnc4server: Xvnc4 can not found 'fixed' font with xorg 7.0.14
Package: vnc4server Version: 4.1.1+X4.3.0-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The vnc4server can not find the fixed font, this is a result from executing: $ Xvnc4 :1 Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb' Xvnc Free Edition 4.1.1 - built Apr 17 2006 16:16:47 Copyright (C) 2002-2005 RealVNC Ltd. See http://www.realvnc.com for information on VNC. Underlying X server release 4030, The XFree86 Project, Inc Tue Apr 18 05:46:44 2006 vncext: VNC extension running! vncext: Listening for VNC connections on port 5901 vncext: created VNC server for screen 0 error opening security policy file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/, removing from list! Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list! Fatal server error: could not open default font 'fixed' The problem is that the fonts are not anymore in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/... the new struct of directories is different, checking strings: $ strings /usr/bin/Xvnc4 | grep \/usr\/X11 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/ /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy ?/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/encodings/encodings.dir And also the fonts path specified in /etc/vnc.conf or ~/.vncrc are not loaded This problem make vn4server unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: LANG=es_MX, LC_CTYPE=es_MX (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages vnc4server depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.1.0-1 GCC support library ii libice6 1:1.0.0-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm61:1.0.0-3 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++64.1.0-1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 1:1.0.0-3 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxtst6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 Testing -- Resource extension ii vnc4-common [vnc-common] 4.1.1+X4.3.0-5 Virtual network computing server s ii x11-common1:7.0.14 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc ii xbase-clients 1:7.0.0-4 miscellaneous X clients ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-11 compression library - runtime Versions of packages vnc4server recommends: ii xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-3 standard fonts for X -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363296: vnc4server: missing font fixed
Package: vnc4server Version: 4.1.1+X4.3 Severity: grave After update to the new x.org packages, I can´t start vncserver anymore. This is the content of the logfile: Tue Apr 18 12:52:57 2006 vncext: VNC extension running! vncext: Listening for VNC connections on port 5901 vncext: created VNC server for screen 0 error opening security policy file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/, removing from list! Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list! Fatal server error: could not open default font 'fixed' xsetroot: unable to open display 'uranus:1' (gnome-session:26269): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: It seems that the server can´t find the fonts of the new x.org font packages.
Bug#363303: pure-ftpd-mysql uninstallable due to libmysqlclient abi change
Package: pure-ftpd-mysql Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Due to mysql-client ABI changes[1], pure-ftpd-mysql is uninstallable: The following packages have unmet dependencies. pure-ftpd-mysql: Depends: libmysqlclient15 (= 5.0.15-1) but it is not installable Package libmysqlclient15 is not available, but is referred to by another package. However the following packages replace it: libmysqlclient15off [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/03/msg00592.html -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages pure-ftpd-mysql depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcap1 1:1.10-14 support for getting/setting POSIX. ii libmysqlclient10 3.23.56-3 LGPL-licensed client library for M ii libpam0g 0.79-3.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7i-1 SSL shared libraries ii pure-ftpd-common 1.0.21-1 Pure-FTPd FTP server (Common Files ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-11 compression library - runtime -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361919: marked as done (exim4: Dropping all hosts with ignore_target_hosts results in host lookup did not complete)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:30:44 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#361919: fixed in exim4 4.50-8sarge2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: exim4 Version: 4.60-4 Severity: normal The following routers for remote domains (the reason for this configuration is left as an excercise to the reader) --8-- lookuphost: driver = dnslookup domains = ! +local_domains ignore_target_hosts = ! /0 : ! 85.194.0.0/18 : ! 212.214.126.0/24 : ! 85.8.0.0/20 same_domain_copy_routing transport = remote_smtp smarthost: driver = manualroute domains = ! +local_domains transport = remote_smtp route_list = * smtpserver.stunet.se:mail.visit.se no_more --8-- give the following (partial) output for exim4 -d -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: --8-- lookuphost router local_part=holmgren domain=lysator.liu.se checking domains lysator.liu.se in @ : ittma-hohah : localhost : kibibyte.se : mail.kibibyte.se? no (end of list) lysator.liu.se in ! +local_domains? yes (end of list) calling lookuphost router lookuphost router called for [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain = lysator.liu.se DNS lookup of lysator.liu.se (MX) succeeded DNS lookup of mail.lysator.liu.se () gave NO_DATA returning DNS_NODATA DNS lookup of mail.lysator.liu.se (A) succeeded 130.236.254.3 in ! /0 : ! 85.194.0.0/18 : ! 212.214.126.0/24 : ! 85.8.0.0/20? yes (end of list) ignored host mail.lysator.liu.se [130.236.254.3] mail.lysator.liu.se in hosts_treat_as_local? no (end of list) fully qualified name = lysator.liu.se host_find_bydns yield = HOST_FIND_AGAIN (1); returned hosts: mail.lysator.liu.se null MX=10 * lookuphost router: defer for [EMAIL PROTECTED] message: host lookup did not complete [EMAIL PROTECTED] cannot be resolved at this time: host lookup did not complete search_tidyup called --8-- As you can see, there is no hint of DNS problems, so the HOST_FIND_AGAIN is very strange. After downgrading to 4.60-1, the problem went away. I suspect this might be caused by the fix to bug #342619. More investigation to come... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (90, 'unstable'), (10, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-ittmahohah1 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: exim4 Source-Version: 4.50-8sarge2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of exim4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: exim4-base_4.50-8sarge2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4-base_4.50-8sarge2_i386.deb exim4-config_4.50-8sarge2_all.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4-config_4.50-8sarge2_all.deb exim4-daemon-heavy_4.50-8sarge2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4-daemon-heavy_4.50-8sarge2_i386.deb exim4-daemon-light_4.50-8sarge2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4-daemon-light_4.50-8sarge2_i386.deb exim4_4.50-8sarge2.diff.gz to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4_4.50-8sarge2.diff.gz exim4_4.50-8sarge2.dsc to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4_4.50-8sarge2.dsc exim4_4.50-8sarge2_all.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4_4.50-8sarge2_all.deb eximon4_4.50-8sarge2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/eximon4_4.50-8sarge2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated exim4 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:23:25 + Source: exim4 Binary: eximon4 exim4-daemon-custom exim4-daemon-heavy exim4-base exim4 exim4-daemon-light exim4-config Architecture: source i386 all Version: 4.50-8sarge2 Distribution: stable Urgency: low Maintainer: Exim4 Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: exim4
Bug#363302: libx11-6: When migrating to X.Org 7, server says: _X11TransOpen: Unable to find transport for local
Package: libx11-6 Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When migrating to X.Org 7 in Debian unstable, X server report this error and does not create the X-11 Socket. Xdm, kdm, gdm and startx stay frozen and only a blank screen with X cursor is showed. If I install libx11-6 from Debian testing (X.Org 6.9) the problem is solved. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libx11-6 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.72 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii x11-common1:7.0.14 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc ii xlibs-data1:7.0.14 transitional package for X11 clien libx11-6 recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362806: chiark-tcl: ftbfs [sparc] error: tcl8.3/tcl.h: No such file
Blars Blarson writes (Bug#362806: chiark-tcl: ftbfs [sparc] error: tcl8.3/tcl.h: No such file): Package: chiark-tcl Version: 1.0.0 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source chiark-tcl failed to build on all buildds. Appears to be missing build-dependancies. Sorry about this. I will look into it. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363305: gmsh: FTBFS: build depends on xlibmesa-glu-dev
Package: gmsh Version: 1.64.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, gmsh build-depends on xlibmesa-glu-dev which isn't available in unstable anymore. Thanks for considering. bye, Roland -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363311: pyroman: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python'
Package: pyroman Version: 0.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'pyroman' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_installudev -ppyroman dh_install -ppyroman dh_link -ppyroman dh_python dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend on python.) make: *** [binary-install/pyroman] Error 1 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'python' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/pyroman-0.3/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/pyroman-0.3/debian/control 2006-04-18 11:11:06.0 + +++ ./debian/control2006-04-18 11:10:58.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: admin Priority: optional Maintainer: Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1.0) +Build-Depends: debhelper, cdbs, python Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: pyroman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363274: marked as done (gaim-dbg: empty package)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:28:30 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Invalid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gaim-dbg Severity: grave This packages does not contain any debugging symbol. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1:1.5.0+1.5.1cvs20051015-3 gaim-dbg is a 40.6 MB package here, containing multiple files under /usr/lib/debug. It's certainly not empty. Please paste the output of $ dpkg -L gaim-dbg; if you reopen (and indicate the version this should apply to). ---End Message---
Bug#353175: marked as done (proftpd-ldap segfaults in (probably) ldap module)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:02:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#353175: fixed in proftpd 1.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: proftpd-ldap Version: 1.2.10-27 proftpd segfaults trying to authenticate users via LDAP in all observed cases. Authenticating users via PAM (which relies on files, not on LDAP in our configuration) works. We found no workaround, so downgraded to 1.2.10-26 for now. This is a sample ftp session as seen by the client: --8--- ftp open X Connected to X.capcom.de. 220 X FTP Server ready. Name (X:): 331 Password required for . Password: 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection Login failed. No control connection for command: Permission denied --8--- This is the corresponding syslog entry: --8--- Feb 16 17:06:41 X proftpd[6458]: X.capcom.de (XX.capcom.de[XXX]) - FTP session opened. Feb 16 17:06:45 X proftpd[6458]: X.capcom.de (XX.capcom.de[XXX]) - ProFTPD terminating (signal 11) Feb 16 17:06:45 X proftpd[6458]: X.capcom.de (XX.capcom.de[XXX]) - FTP session closed. --8--- The last observable activity of the proftpd is enquiring the user and group information from the LDAP server and receiving appropriate responses. The segfault occurs after receiving the last group search response. strace shows that the segfault occurs outside of a system call. ltrace shows two searches for configuration keys (AnonymousGroup and AuthAliasOnly, both unset) and then this (last line of the config search included): --8--- [pid 6511] strcmp(AuthAliasOnly, USER) = -1 [pid 6511] memset(0x815e53c, '\000', 48) = 0x815e53c [pid 6511] memset(0x815e56c, '\000', 4) = 0x815e56c [pid 6511] strcasecmp(getpwnam, getpwnam)= 0 [pid 6511] memcpy(0xbfd72a40, , 2048) = 0xbfd72a40 [pid 6511] strcasecmp(getpwnam, getpwnam)= 0 [pid 6511] memcpy(0xbfd72a40, , 2048) = 0xbfd72a40 [pid 6511] strcasecmp(, )= 0 [pid 6511] memset(0x8155904, '\000', 20) = 0x8155904 [pid 6511] memset(0x815e574, '\000', 28) = 0x815e574 [pid 6511] strlen()= 8 [pid 6511] strlen(X) = 21 [pid 6511] strlen()= 0 [pid 6511] strlen()= 8 [pid 6511] memset(0x815e5d4, '\000', 48) = 0x815e5d4 [pid 6511] memset(0x815e604, '\000', 4) = 0x815e604 [pid 6511] strcasecmp(gid_name, gid_name)= 0 [pid 6511] memcpy(0xbfd72a40, , 2048) = 0xbfd72a40 [pid 6511] strcasecmp(gid_name, gid_name)= 0 [pid 6511] memcpy(0xbfd72a40, , 2048) = 0xbfd72a40 [pid 6511] --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) --- --8--- proftpd configuration file: --8--- # # /etc/proftpd.conf -- This is a basic ProFTPD configuration file. # To really apply changes reload proftpd after modifications. # ServerName X FTP Server ServerType standalone ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DeferWelcomeoff IdentLookupsoff MultilineRFC2228on DefaultServer on ShowSymlinkson Umask 0113 0002 TimeoutNoTransfer 600 TimeoutStalled 600 TimeoutIdle 1200 ServerIdent on X FTP Server ready. DisplayLoginwelcome.msg DisplayFirstChdir .message ListOptions -l DenyFilter \*.*/ # Uncomment this if you are using NIS or LDAP to retrieve passwords: PersistentPasswdoff # Uncomment this if you would use TLS module: #TLSEngine on # Uncomment this if you would use quota module: #Quotas on # Uncomment this if you would use ratio module: #Ratios on # Port 21 is the standard FTP port. Port
Bug#363324: nvidia-graphics-modules-i386: FTBFS (unsatisfied nvidia-kernel-source) in testing
Package: nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 Version: 1.0.8178+2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source This package Build-Deps on nvidia-kernel-source, which was removed from testing. This only affects testing, but makes this package RC-buggy in all releases together with #362424 until the version in NEW is accepted in unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363311: marked as done (pyroman: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python')
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:02:36 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#363311: fixed in pyroman 0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: pyroman Version: 0.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'pyroman' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_installudev -ppyroman dh_install -ppyroman dh_link -ppyroman dh_python dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend on python.) make: *** [binary-install/pyroman] Error 1 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'python' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/pyroman-0.3/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/pyroman-0.3/debian/control 2006-04-18 11:11:06.0 + +++ ./debian/control2006-04-18 11:10:58.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: admin Priority: optional Maintainer: Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1.0) +Build-Depends: debhelper, cdbs, python Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: pyroman ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pyroman Source-Version: 0.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pyroman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pyroman_0.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pyroman/pyroman_0.3-2.diff.gz pyroman_0.3-2.dsc to pool/main/p/pyroman/pyroman_0.3-2.dsc pyroman_0.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/p/pyroman/pyroman_0.3-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pyroman package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:42:19 +0200 Source: pyroman Binary: pyroman Architecture: source all Version: 0.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: pyroman- Firewall configuration tool for complex networks Closes: 358402 363311 Changes: pyroman (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Gnah. Really add python build-dep (Closes: #363311, #358402) Files: aa7d4e3e929846c1168056e3edcc82dc 568 admin optional pyroman_0.3-2.dsc 010b5f0acbe7f7d50dc160db41639a6e 3395 admin optional pyroman_0.3-2.diff.gz 18a5d301d60d55fb7712cca744c3fc84 29344 admin optional pyroman_0.3-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFERN8sntB470s6E1wRAphFAKCLkxpku+2jSdQnODFGrt83E2pXtgCcCCxs fwK/boLsmulwt2z/Ykb7ooQ= =FNX5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#363274: acknowledged by developer (Invalid)
Debian Bug Tracking System writes: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #363274: gaim-dbg: empty package, which was filed against the gaim-dbg package. My bad. No clue how I manage to have an empty gaim-dbg package. Does not matter much I guess. Sorry for the noise. Cheers, -- Loic Dachary, 12 bd Magenta, 75010 Paris. Tel: 33 8 71 18 43 38 http://www.fsffrance.org/ http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363287: marked as done (mpfr: FTBFS on s390, illegal instruction in umul_ppmm)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:02:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#363287: fixed in mpfr 2.2.0.dfsg.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: mpfr Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hello, MPFR no longer build from source on s390. A complete build log can be found at : http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mpfrver=2.2.0.dfsg.1-5arch=s390stamp=1145312906file=logas=raw I verified with the unmodified source for GMP and MPFR that it is not related to the debian packaging. The `Illegal instruction' or segfault errors occur in umul_ppmm according to gdb (verified on tconst_catalan, tcheck and tmul). I found the following changelog entry, maybe related : 2005-03-22 Patrick Pelissier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] * mul.c: Fix bug on HP-UX. longlong's umul_ppmm seems to be buggy on such a system. Don't use it under HP-UX. I'll try to find a testcase for umul_ppmm to see if we can forward this problem to GMP. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: mpfr Source-Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mpfr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmpfr-dev_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpfr/libmpfr-dev_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb libmpfr1_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpfr/libmpfr1_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mpfr/mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6.diff.gz mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6.dsc to pool/main/m/mpfr/mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Laurent Fousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mpfr package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:49:05 +0200 Source: mpfr Binary: libmpfr-dev libmpfr1 Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Laurent Fousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Laurent Fousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libmpfr-dev - multiple precision floating-point computation developers tools libmpfr1 - multiple precision floating-point computation Closes: 363287 Changes: mpfr (2.2.0.dfsg.1-6) unstable; urgency=low . * Don't use buggy longlong.h on s390 (closes: #363287). Files: 925004ad76d00cd23658b35031c517b4 719 math optional mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6.dsc 367f5890e009c8599fd11b237f56bbdf 65898 math optional mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6.diff.gz 6a059c3e306c561997f3aa5ed9cae573 213286 libs optional libmpfr1_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb e298131a4260389a99a33e4881e3a611 237640 libdevel optional libmpfr-dev_2.2.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEROHzRoAVF6FpbSsRAnbjAJ4rhCZHS3gCKXeQ6lKwH/5P9v9xBgCeMDDW amecCRmXqdKCwA0Rmah+hV4= =sZ9W -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#363275: marked as done (emelfm: x11-common 1.0.1-3 conflicts with emelfm)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:17:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#363275: fixed in emelfm 0.9.2-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: emelfm Version: 0.9.2-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, The latest version of x11-common (1.0.1-3) conflicts with emelfm, for whatever reason. :-( This makes it emelfm uninstallable, from now on. HTH, George B. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (1001, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages emelfm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libglib1.21.2.10-10.1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-18 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 1:1.0.0-3 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxi61:1.0.0-3 X11 Input extension library ii xlibs 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m emelfm recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: emelfm Source-Version: 0.9.2-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of emelfm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: emelfm_0.9.2-8.diff.gz to pool/main/e/emelfm/emelfm_0.9.2-8.diff.gz emelfm_0.9.2-8.dsc to pool/main/e/emelfm/emelfm_0.9.2-8.dsc emelfm_0.9.2-8_i386.deb to pool/main/e/emelfm/emelfm_0.9.2-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated emelfm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:02:49 +0200 Source: emelfm Binary: emelfm Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.2-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: emelfm - file manager for X/gtk Closes: 363275 Changes: emelfm (0.9.2-8) unstable; urgency=medium . * orphaning package, QA maintainer set (well, my first package in Debian...) * moved binary back to /usr/bin, adapted menu file (closes: #363275) * meta changes: debhelper files to level 5, debian/compat and dh_installman used now, quotation in menu, policy version Files: aa40baeb3f656f3faef8c732daf354d6 603 utils optional emelfm_0.9.2-8.dsc c321e3f3748665d49e58d5cb2f778e64 25642 utils optional emelfm_0.9.2-8.diff.gz 06c370b640e9de5af20ded6933baa991 140684 utils optional emelfm_0.9.2-8_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEROW34QZIHu3wCMURAqVfAJ9kLGsehRnIkwW2UMorZlrw3y5iOwCgg9Qw 01S+GTJgyPmpK6KYbleTozk= =fU5q -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#358402: marked as done (pyroman: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:02:36 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#358402: fixed in pyroman 0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: pyroman Version: 0.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'pyroman' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_install -ppyroman dh_link -ppyroman dh_python dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend on python.) make: *** [binary-install/pyroman] Error 1 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/pyroman-0.2/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/pyroman-0.2/debian/control 2006-03-22 16:12:29.0 + +++ ./debian/control2006-03-22 16:12:23.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: admin Priority: optional Maintainer: Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1.0) +Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1.0), python-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: pyroman ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pyroman Source-Version: 0.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pyroman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pyroman_0.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pyroman/pyroman_0.3-2.diff.gz pyroman_0.3-2.dsc to pool/main/p/pyroman/pyroman_0.3-2.dsc pyroman_0.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/p/pyroman/pyroman_0.3-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pyroman package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:42:19 +0200 Source: pyroman Binary: pyroman Architecture: source all Version: 0.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: pyroman- Firewall configuration tool for complex networks Closes: 358402 363311 Changes: pyroman (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Gnah. Really add python build-dep (Closes: #363311, #358402) Files: aa7d4e3e929846c1168056e3edcc82dc 568 admin optional pyroman_0.3-2.dsc 010b5f0acbe7f7d50dc160db41639a6e 3395 admin optional pyroman_0.3-2.diff.gz 18a5d301d60d55fb7712cca744c3fc84 29344 admin optional pyroman_0.3-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFERN8sntB470s6E1wRAphFAKCLkxpku+2jSdQnODFGrt83E2pXtgCcCCxs fwK/boLsmulwt2z/Ykb7ooQ= =FNX5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#363325: wrong dependencies from nunit-console 2.2.7-1 to libnunit-cil 2.2.6-1
Package: nunit-console, nunit Version: 2.2.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/code/id/yaz/ztest$ apt-cache show nunit-console Package: nunit-console Priority: optional Section: devel Installed-Size: 116 Maintainer: Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all Source: nunit Version: 2.2.7-1 Depends: mono-jit (= 1.0), libmono-corlib1.0-cil (= 1.0), libnunit2.2.6-cil, mono-classlib-1.0 (= 1.0) This dependency should be libnunit2.2.7-1-cil in unstable distribution, as mixing testing libnunit-cil 2.2.6-1 and unstable nunit-console 2.2.7-1 is not the way to go. Cheers, Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc5-m30g Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#360417: bootsplash
|--== Junichi Uekawa writes: JU Hi, JU Anyway, we need to find some solution over how to package bootsplash JU package; we are in a difficult situation where there is no bootsplash JU package while there is kernel-patch-bootsplash in Debian. Hi, sorry for the long delay. I think I've found a solution to the problem: the latest versions of initramfs-tools offer support for custom hooks in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/ which are run at every update-initramfs run, which we could invoke in the postinst script. I've already committed a working hook script: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/demudi/bootsplash/trunk/debian/patches/initramfs.dpatch?op=filerev=0sc=0 but the package still needs to be polished. Right now I'm building the latest 2.6.16-7 source with the bootsplash patch applied, and in the next days I'm going to carefully test the package. All keep you all informed.. Ciao, Free JU At Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:25:24 +0900, JU Junichi Uekawa wrote: Hi, JU I'm only casually looking at the package, so I might have missed something. JU Is the procedure documented? No the procedure it's not documented. There's just the script, which actually I didn't change much from the original version. I don't think it's suitable for Debian inclusion as it is. Needs more touching. JU I think it's a case that requires handling through kernel-package hooks. I didn't know about these hooks. I had a veryquick look to the documentation, but I couldn't find a simple place to place hooks, like /usr/lib/kernel-package/hooks.d. Do you know something more? I've looked, and kernel-img.conf seems like the place to add these things. However, it seems to only support one postinst hook (which in my case is sorry for the delay.. the usual quite busy excuse ;) JU This package doesn't seem to handle the case of JU 1. bootsplash package is installed JU 2. new kernel is installed after bootsplash package is already JU installed Yes, it's true: case not handled. I think it's time to discuss with kernel-package maintainer (manoj) and debian-kernel guys, on what would be a appropriate solution. I have a few questions on how it's meant to work. 'splash' command adds the jpeg file to initrd, and kernel reads the initrd? What happens when it's going to work with initramfs? regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project JU regards, JU junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363325: wrong dependencies from nunit-console 2.2.7-1 to libnunit-cil 2.2.6-1
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 15:19 +0200, Marc Cromme wrote: Package: nunit-console, nunit Version: 2.2.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/code/id/yaz/ztest$ apt-cache show nunit-console Package: nunit-console Priority: optional Section: devel Installed-Size: 116 Maintainer: Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all Source: nunit Version: 2.2.7-1 Depends: mono-jit (= 1.0), libmono-corlib1.0-cil (= 1.0), libnunit2.2.6-cil, mono-classlib-1.0 (= 1.0) This dependency should be libnunit2.2.7-1-cil in unstable distribution, as mixing testing libnunit-cil 2.2.6-1 and unstable nunit-console 2.2.7-1 is not the way to go. This is actually correct. The package in testing is called libnunit-cil - NOT libnunit2.2.6-cil. The nunit=2.2.7 source package generates a libnunit2.2.6-cil package because 2.2.7 and 2.2.6 are API compatible. See the CLI policy for details. How is this causing you problems? Cheers, Jelmer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#334156: NMU of hat
Hi Ian and Isaac, I am preparing an NMU of hat (which probably will be uploaded by my AM Martin Michlmayr). It has two longstanding RC bugs which make hat unusable and FTBFS. I intend to update hat to a new upstream version 2.04 and drop the support for nhc98, which is removed from the archive, and ghc5, which is on its way out anyway. I you have any opinions or have prepared some updated yourself, please let me know. Greetings Arjan signature.asc Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
Bug#362431: upgrade broke X server
I upgraded tonight and the xorg server broke. Complaining about missing bitmap and pcidata modules. As outlined I commented out the offending line: # ModulePath /usr/X11R6/lib/modules gdm and X now work successfully. Problem: This particular line should have automatically been removed for me by the upgrade process. Thanks Ken -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 353589 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.17 severity 353589 serious Bug#353589: CVE-2005-4713 and CVE-2006-0056: remote vulnerabilities Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#363252: manpages-dev: file collision with modutils
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363252 serious Bug#363252: manpages-dev: file collision with modutils Severity set to `serious'. merge 363252 360843 Bug#360843: manpages-dev tries to overwrite files from modutils (create_module.2.gz) Bug#363252: manpages-dev: file collision with modutils Bug#361084: package manpages-dev in unstable is broken Bug#361369: conflicting files with modutils Bug#361958: modutils conflicts with manpages-dev. see Bug #360843 Merged 360843 361084 361369 361958 363252. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334156: NMU of hat
Hi Arjan, On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote: I am preparing an NMU of hat My plan has been to file a bug requesting hat's removal. If you would like to take over the package then please feel free, but an NMU would probably be a waste of effort. Thanks Ian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363344: initramfs-tools and HyperSPARC processor
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.59b Severity: grave Arch: sparc It is impossible to build a ramfs image on a HyperSPARC workstation. I have try to install etch/sparc on a SS20 that runs with four HyperSPARC processors. When it boots, system hangs when it tries to load the ramfs image. If I replace HyperSPARC by SuperSPARC-II, I can restart the workstation without any trouble. I have tested some configurations and some differents sparc32 CPU's. The only combinaison that fails is ramfs created by initramfs-tools with HyperSPARC. Regards, JKB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363274: gaim-dbg: empty package
What? Could you provide just a little bit more information about this, like what version of gaim-dbg you're using, and what you mean by This packages does not contain any debugging symbol, since it certainly looks like it does for all the architectures I see. Loic Dachary (OuoU) wrote: Package: gaim-dbg Severity: grave This packages does not contain any debugging symbol. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346164: Reopen, reassign to clisp
reopen 346164 reassign 346164 clisp stop The clisp package still tries to use gcc-3.3 for certain platforms but does not depend on that compiler for the platforms in question. Either it should just try and use the system gcc or a proper dependency on gcc-3.3 should be added. Thanks, - robin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363344: initramfs-tools and HyperSPARC processor
severity 363344 important tags 363344 moreinfo thanks cher bertrand, On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:04:08PM +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote: Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.59b Severity: grave Arch: sparc hmm it may be serious, but for now i go for important. anyway you omitted lots of information. It is impossible to build a ramfs image on a HyperSPARC workstation. please post the error when trying to build the initramfs? I have try to install etch/sparc on a SS20 that runs with four HyperSPARC processors. When it boots, system hangs when it tries to load the ramfs image. please post the relevant messages. are you dropped into a console? are your devices created? If I replace HyperSPARC by SuperSPARC-II, I can restart the workstation without any trouble. I have tested some configurations and some differents sparc32 CPU's. The only combinaison that fails is ramfs created by initramfs-tools with HyperSPARC. trave11er notified me of some sparc trouble, but from aboves bug report i have no idea where they could come from. does fstype work? please post output of: /usr/lib/klibc/bin/fstype /dev/sda1 # please use your real root cat /proc/cmdline lsmod merci beacoup pour vos explications. sinon il m'est impossible de savoir ce qui ce passe. sincèrement -- maks
Processed: Reopen, reassign to clisp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 346164 Bug#346164: FTBFS on arm, hppa, sparc Bug reopened, originator not changed. reassign 346164 clisp Bug#346164: FTBFS on arm, hppa, sparc Bug reassigned from package `mcvs' to `clisp'. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#363344: initramfs-tools and HyperSPARC processor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363344 important Bug#363344: initramfs-tools and HyperSPARC processor Severity set to `important'. tags 363344 moreinfo Bug#363344: initramfs-tools and HyperSPARC processor There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363362: x11-common: postinst fails if /usr/X11R6/bin is not empty
Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.0.14 Severity: grave The postinst contains the following: if [ -d /usr/X11R6/bin ] [ ! -L /usr/X11R6/bin ]; then rmdir /usr/X11R6/bin || die Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet empty. Please remove any items still in the directory. You can move them back after the install has completed successfully. fi When I met this error I first checked whether it was April 1st or something. I don't think this is acceptable to stomp on such a minor error, especially when previous upgrades happen to let some files in this place. Please consider moving these files to /usr/bin directly if they don't conflict with anything, or backuping them elsewhere. BTW, the following is also incorrect: if ! [ -e /usr/X11R6/bin ]; then ln -s /usr/bin /usr/X11R6/bin || die Could not link /usr/bin to /usr/X11R6/bin fi it should be: ln -s ../bin /usr/X11R6/bin instead. See policy 10.5. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361270: marked as done (update-initrams doesn't call lilo, when grub is around)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:00:03 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#361270: Upgrade of initramfs-tools made kernel unbootable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.59b Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Upgrading initramfs-tools yesterday caused the current kernel 2.6.15-1 to become unbootable, apparently because the upgrade process regenerated initrd.img-2.6.15-1-k7. The upgrade process should have warned me to rerun lilo. Note that I normally use kernel 2.6.15-1-k7, rather than 2.6.12 listed below, but due to 2.6.15 being unbootable I had to boot into 2.6.12. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages initramfs-tools depends on: ii busybox 1:1.01-4 Tiny utilities for small and embed ii cpio 2.6-11 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar ii klibc-utils 1.2.4-1small statically-linked utilities ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-2tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii udev 0.088-2/dev/ and hotplug management daemo initramfs-tools recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- with lilo Reply-To: In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] typo in changelog closed wrong bug report, adding the 0.60 changelog, which should have closed this one. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:33:18 +0200 Source: initramfs-tools Binary: initramfs-tools Architecture: source all Version: 0.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian kernel team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Changed-By: maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: initramfs-tools - tools for generating an initramfs Closes: 348147 358649 358917 362568 362816 Changes: initramfs-tools (0.60) unstable; urgency=low . E ho trovato l'invasor . * scripts/functions: Allow boot scripts to modify exported boot parameters. Thanks David Härdeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patch. (closes: 348147) This allows the inclusion of cryptoroot hooks to cryptsetup! . * init: add cryptopts parsing and export. . * init: Move parse_numeric down to the mounting root block. . * init, scripts/local: Allow rootflags to be passed in kernel cmdline. Thanks Thomas Luzat [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patch. (closes: #358917) . * init: Allow passing nfs root mount option in kernel cmdline. Thanks Brian Brunswick [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patch. (closes: #358649) . * update-initramfs: s/ALL/all/, fix it to actually run on update in non verbose mode. (closes: #362568) . * update-initramfs: Warn in big letters about grub and lilo installs. (closes: #362816) . * debian/bug: Add reportbug script with info about cmdline, fs and lsmod. . * initramfs-tools(8): Document the /conf/param.conf feature. . * mkinitramfs-kpkg(8): Spell out, why the wrapper script is needed. Files: 0786e9cffe33196a2389d3f42a67899b 629 utils optional initramfs-tools_0.60.dsc 885180fc00f9e98da0d1c5a5f3d9236c 37338 utils optional initramfs-tools_0.60.tar.gz 5c42f6e800e87b6b7f184ad610214bfc 43460 utils optional initramfs-tools_0.60_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFERO9b6n7So0GVSSARApyGAJ9SHAGjt/wSOWtMjvmnl8NRIGR7+wCeP5BH X5hmYN6Wbum45lb/hKhyzig= =MRhR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- maks ---End Message---
Bug#363295: vnc4server: Xvnc4 can not found 'fixed' font with xorg 7.0.14
Hi Ok, will change the default fonts dir. Regards, // Ola On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:53:56AM -0500, Carlos C Soto wrote: Package: vnc4server Version: 4.1.1+X4.3.0-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The vnc4server can not find the fixed font, this is a result from executing: $ Xvnc4 :1 Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb' Xvnc Free Edition 4.1.1 - built Apr 17 2006 16:16:47 Copyright (C) 2002-2005 RealVNC Ltd. See http://www.realvnc.com for information on VNC. Underlying X server release 4030, The XFree86 Project, Inc Tue Apr 18 05:46:44 2006 vncext: VNC extension running! vncext: Listening for VNC connections on port 5901 vncext: created VNC server for screen 0 error opening security policy file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/, removing from list! Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list! Fatal server error: could not open default font 'fixed' The problem is that the fonts are not anymore in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/... the new struct of directories is different, checking strings: $ strings /usr/bin/Xvnc4 | grep \/usr\/X11 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/ /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy ?/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/encodings/encodings.dir And also the fonts path specified in /etc/vnc.conf or ~/.vncrc are not loaded This problem make vn4server unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: LANG=es_MX, LC_CTYPE=es_MX (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages vnc4server depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.1.0-1 GCC support library ii libice6 1:1.0.0-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm61:1.0.0-3 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++64.1.0-1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 1:1.0.0-3 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxtst6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 Testing -- Resource extension ii vnc4-common [vnc-common] 4.1.1+X4.3.0-5 Virtual network computing server s ii x11-common1:7.0.14 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc ii xbase-clients 1:7.0.0-4 miscellaneous X clients ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-11 compression library - runtime Versions of packages vnc4server recommends: ii xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-3 standard fonts for X -- no debconf information -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363362: x11-common: postinst fails if /usr/X11R6/bin is not empty
severity 363362 important thanks On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:30:53PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: The postinst contains the following: if [ -d /usr/X11R6/bin ] [ ! -L /usr/X11R6/bin ]; then rmdir /usr/X11R6/bin || die Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet empty. Please remove any items still in the directory. You can move them back after the install has completed successfully. fi When I met this error I first checked whether it was April 1st or something. I don't think this is acceptable to stomp on such a minor error, especially when previous upgrades happen to let some files in this place. Please consider moving these files to /usr/bin directly if they don't conflict with anything, or backuping them elsewhere. This is a duplicate of bug #362885. Unless you can come up with a better upgrade path than the one that's been implemented, it's also a non-bug. BTW, the following is also incorrect: if ! [ -e /usr/X11R6/bin ]; then ln -s /usr/bin /usr/X11R6/bin || die Could not link /usr/bin to /usr/X11R6/bin fi it should be: ln -s ../bin /usr/X11R6/bin instead. See policy 10.5. Correct, this is a policy bug as you say. It's a severity: important one, though. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#363362: x11-common: postinst fails if /usr/X11R6/bin is not empty
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363362 important Bug#363362: x11-common: postinst fails if /usr/X11R6/bin is not empty Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363370: xine-ui: printf missing-format-string bugs
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.3-1.3
Severity: serious
Posted to xine-devel by Diego Pettenó [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
: Seems like there's disclosure of a vulnerability in latest released xine-ui
: (0.99.4) at http://www.open-security.org/advisories/16 . The code that's
: there referred to is already fixed in current CVS since last August, I'm
: re-attaching the patch I submitted that time for who wants to fix this
: independently from a new release.
The patch (attached) is not present in 0.99.3-1.3.
--
| Darren Salt| linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| + Travel less. Share transport more. PRODUCE LESS CARBON DIOXIDE.
If you think this tagline is confusing, then change one pig.
Index: xine-ui-0.99.4/src/xitk/main.c
===
--- xine-ui-0.99.4.orig/src/xitk/main.c
+++ xine-ui-0.99.4/src/xitk/main.c
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ static void print_formatted(char *title,
int len;
char*blanks = ;
- printf(title);
+ printf(%s, title);
sprintf(buffer, %s, blanks);
plugin = *plugins++;
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static void print_formatted(char *title,
sprintf(buffer, %s%s%s, buffer, (strlen(buffer) == strlen(blanks)) ?
: , , plugin);
}
else {
- printf(buffer);
+ printf(%s, buffer);
printf(,\n);
snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer), %s%s, blanks, plugin);
}
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static void print_formatted(char *title,
}
if(strlen(buffer))
-printf(buffer);
+printf(%s, buffer);
printf(.\n\n);
}
Index: xine-ui-0.99.4/src/xitk/xine-toolkit/xitk.c
===
--- xine-ui-0.99.4.orig/src/xitk/xine-toolkit/xitk.c
+++ xine-ui-0.99.4/src/xitk/xine-toolkit/xitk.c
@@ -1875,7 +1875,7 @@ void xitk_init(Display *display, XColor
sprintf(buffer, %s%s, buffer, ]-);
if(verbosity)
-printf(buffer);
+printf(%s, buffer);
gXitk-wm_type = xitk_check_wm(display);
Bug#334156: NMU of hat
Op di, 18-04-2006 te 16:17 +0100, schreef Ian Lynagh: Hi Arjan, On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote: I am preparing an NMU of hat My plan has been to file a bug requesting hat's removal. If you would like to take over the package then please feel free, but an NMU would probably be a waste of effort. Hmm, Well I already have prepared it :) I could take over maintenance of the package, but I have not really used it. I will think about it for a while. Anyway here is my diff.gz for version 2.04 and a list of the changes: Changes: hat (2.04-0.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * New upstream release. - Works with ghc version 6.4. * debian/control.in: - remove hat-nhc98 and the Build-Depends on nhc98 because nhc98 is removed from the archive. (Closes: #334156) - remove hat-ghc5 and the Build-Depends on ghc5 because ghc5 will be removed from the archive as well and can not be installed for quite some time now. * debian/control: update Depends for hat-ghc6. (Closes: #310009) * debian/rules: remove src/hattools/for_foreign_imports.h on clean to keep the diff.gz small and tidy. hat_2.04-0.1.diff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data signature.asc Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
Bug#361910: FTBFS (alpha): Undefined system call: sigprocmask
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Falk Hueffner wrote: klibc fails to build on alpha: [...] SYSCALL FOUND: getrlimit SYSCALL FOUND: tkill klibc/syscalls/SYSCALLS.i:187: Undefined system call: sigprocmask ld -r -o klibc/syscalls/syscalls.o ld: no input files make[4]: *** [klibc/syscalls/syscalls.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [klibc/syscalls] Error 2 make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [klibc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/klibc-1.3.3' could you try if the following patch helps? afair alpha has the rt syscalls -- maks diff --git a/include/arch/alpha/klibc/archconfig.h b/include/arch/alpha/klibc/archconfig.h index 773ea62..2878f84 100644 --- a/include/arch/alpha/klibc/archconfig.h +++ b/include/arch/alpha/klibc/archconfig.h @@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ #ifndef _KLIBC_ARCHCONFIG_H #define _KLIBC_ARCHCONFIG_H -/* All defaults */ +#define _KLIBC_USE_RT_SIG 1 #endif /* _KLIBC_ARCHCONFIG_H */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363375: kernel-patch-openswan: Patched linux-source-2.6.16 fails to compile
Package: kernel-patch-openswan Version: 1:2.4.5-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm sorry to report that the most recent versions of the kernel-patch-openswan and linux-source-2.6.16 don't agree: net/ipsec/ipsec_alg.c:847:2: warning: #warning Using built-in AES rather than CryptoAPI AES net/ipsec/ipsec_alg.c:857:2: warning: #warning Using built-in 3des rather than CryptoAPI 3des CC [M] net/ipsec/ipsec_alg_cryptoapi.o net/ipsec/ipsec_alg_cryptoapi.c: In function 'setup_cipher_list': net/ipsec/ipsec_alg_cryptoapi.c:349: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type CC [M] net/ipsec/ipcomp.o net/ipsec/ipcomp.c: In function 'skb_copy_ipcomp': net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'private' net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'private' -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-lpc.2.k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages kernel-patch-openswan depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.94-1 The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.94-1 The GNU file management utilities Versions of packages kernel-patch-openswan recommends: ii kernel-package10.040 A utility for building Linux kerne -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363373: xvfb-run has disappeared
Package: xvfb Version: 1:1.0.2-5 Severity: grave xvfb doesn't contain the xvfb-run command anymore. It is going to break some packages relying on it to build correctly. The old script from the 6.9 package works correctly with the new version, so it's only a matter of including it. (Note that the manual page has also disappeared, but this may be intentional, as the inline help is quite complete.) Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to util-vserver, tagging 362887, tagging 363342, tagging 363343
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16 package util-vserver Ignoring bugs not assigned to: util-vserver tags 362887 + pending Bug#362887: util-vserver - FTBFS: 1 of 18 tests failed: Segmentation fault There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 363342 + pending Bug#363342: util-vserver: long description referrs to the wrong URL There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 363343 + pending Bug#363343: util-vserver: description mentions a ctx patch There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344942: doxymacs: Fails to install with !! File error ((Cannot open load file url))
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 07:20:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: I suggest depending upon w3-el-e21 unconditionally, which would make things robust, even if it's not strictly required in all cases. xemacs21 already depends upon xemacs21-basesupport, so Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.5-1), libxml2 (= 2.6.21), zlib1g (= 1:1.2.1), emacs21 | emacsen, w3-el-e21, w3-url-e21 might be better. Caveat: I don't claim to be an emacs packaging expert, so this does need checking! While this certainly would fix the bug, it would mean that you have to install emacs21 in order to be able to install doxymacs (because w3-url-e21 depends on it) which is a rather big penalty if one does only use xemacs... Another possibility would be to unfold the emacsen dependency and change it to: Depends: (...shlibs...), w3-el-e21 | xemacs21 | emacs-snapshot Since w3-el-21 depends on w3-url-e21 and emacs21, these are automatically included. This looks like a much cleaner and more robust solution. Regards, Roger -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail. pgp9zEzjgPqnJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#362074: Raising the severity again
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: tags 362074 + pending thanks Awaiting for the new libxp-dev package, after recent xutils-dev fixing. So stay tuned... While the new libxp-dev should be coming soon, this really looks like bug #363267, in which case xaw3dg has no reason for a build-dependency on libxp-dev. I can't find any references to libXp in the xaw3dg sources themselves. Does this sound correct to you? Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#362074: Raising the severity again
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:39:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: tags 362074 + pending thanks Awaiting for the new libxp-dev package, after recent xutils-dev fixing. So stay tuned... While the new libxp-dev should be coming soon, this really looks like bug #363267, in which case xaw3dg has no reason for a build-dependency on libxp-dev. I can't find any references to libXp in the xaw3dg sources themselves. Does this sound correct to you? Yes, AFAIK it is due only to dependencies automatically built by imake, because no Xp function is used in the sources. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362885: x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: If you move the files, dpkg may be unable to find them at package uninstallation, resulting in orphaned files on the filesystem; or there may Not 100% correct. The problem of deinstallation is covered with the symlink workaround since dpkg AFAICS follows the symlinks in the path when removing a file. Hmm, you're assuming that we don't, at some later date (post-etch), drop the /usr/X11R6/bin compat symlink. If one of these packages is removed *after* that point, dpkg has no way to locate the binaries in order to remove them. It's only the other way round that does create headaches, future installations of third-party packages which may try to install files into X11R6/bin and may overwrite files from other packages. I thought a while about that and could not come up with any sane solution, not even hacking dpkg's .list files would help because of missing information. Only blacklisting this directory in dpkg would have been a good solution but it's too late for that. Yes, that is the other side of the issue. Forcing the user to deal with the conflict is the only safe way of handling files left in /usr/X11R6/bin. It should probably be turned into a debconf note later on, but for the time being I think the current behavior is as good as it's going to get. safe does not mean reliable or usefriendly. As I'm using the word safe, I do mean that it's reliable -- you reliably get one of two results, a successful upgrade or a message telling you that you need to reconcile by hand. I still think that the current lone rmdir hidden in the postinst is not sufficient. What we need is IMO a list of dirty files - files that have existed in Debian in X11R6/bin directory before and which would certainly be uninstalled by apt/dpkg during the upgrade. The debconf's config script should be executed during dpkg-preconfigure (NOTE: not in the middle of upgrade!), scan the existing /usr/X11R6/bin directory, substract the set of dirty files and if there are still remaining files in the list, then the user should be given a chance to abort the whole installation before it starts. And a list of remaining files should be printed. Maybe together with 3rd-party packages that those files may belong to. If you wish me to implement a such solution, please say do it and I will try to. If you do compile a list of files that you believe came from packages, what do you do with them if you find them still there when it's time to turn /usr/X11R6/bin into a symlink? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#363373: xvfb-run has disappeared
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 363373 normal Bug#363373: xvfb-run has disappeared Severity set to `normal'. kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#361910: FTBFS (alpha): Undefined system call: sigprocmask
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: could you try if the following patch helps? Yes, it helps. Thanks. -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: This is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 340712 serious Bug#340712: firebird2-server-common: binary file security.fdb is not a config file but uses ucf! Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362887: marked as done (util-vserver - FTBFS: 1 of 18 tests failed: Segmentation fault)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:18:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#362887: fixed in util-vserver 0.30.210-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.210-7
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of util-vserver_0.30.210-7 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
PASS: lib_internal/testsuite/isnumber
PASS: lib_internal/testsuite/isnumber-gnu
/bin/sh: line 4: 8875 Segmentation fault ensc_use_expensive_tests=no
ensc_test_debug=no srctestsuitedir=./src/testsuite
libinternaltestsuitedir=./lib_internal/testsuite ${dir}$tst
FAIL: lib_internal/testsuite/sigbus
PASS: lib_internal/testsuite/sigbus-gnu
1 of 18 tests failed
Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
make[4]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.210'
make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.210'
make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.210'
make[1]: *** [check] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/util-vserver-0.30.210'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20060416-0053
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: util-vserver
Source-Version: 0.30.210-8
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
util-vserver, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
util-vserver_0.30.210-8.diff.gz
to pool/main/u/util-vserver/util-vserver_0.30.210-8.diff.gz
util-vserver_0.30.210-8.dsc
to pool/main/u/util-vserver/util-vserver_0.30.210-8.dsc
util-vserver_0.30.210-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/u/util-vserver/util-vserver_0.30.210-8_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated util-vserver package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 00:37:27 -0400
Source: util-vserver
Binary: util-vserver
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.30.210-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
util-vserver - user-space tools for Linux-Vserver virtual private servers
Closes: 361382 362887 363342 363343
Changes:
util-vserver (0.30.210-8) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Removed build-time tests from debian/rules (Closes: #362887)
* Update description to fix URL (Closes: #363342)
* Update description to be more up to date (Closes: #363343)
* Fix replacement of /etc/vservers/.defaults/vdirbase even if it
has been modified locally (Closes: #361382)
Files:
60ecc8d75c97f63ab2cc194e0e1cfcaf 839 net optional util-vserver_0.30.210-8.dsc
314c2bfaa9513bf68f844a2cbb4ae573 46425 net optional
util-vserver_0.30.210-8.diff.gz
14f85f51f7fbff768cca20c0d89a44f6 393970 net optional
util-vserver_0.30.210-8_i386.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFERVQI9n4qXRzy1ioRAiKmAJ94b3478EiUVv9FQhR0R03TiCTMVwCbBQiO
Eb12ndu/wEmCO+tB0uebdAM=
=h9A7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---End Message---
Processed: merging 363147 360148
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.17 merge 363147 360148 Bug#360148: libxklavier10: Adding Arabic to keyboard switcher in GNOME generates an error Bug#363147: libxklavier10: Debian patch xorg_xkb_path.patch breaks libxklavier Merged 360148 363147. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of ucd-snmp 4.2.5-5.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 355641 + fixed Bug#355641: no shared libraries in latest non-maintainer upload Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed tag 359204 + fixed Bug#359204: Missing snmp_api.h Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362136: marked as done (ksynaptics: ftbfs on i386 sid)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:43:49 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line ksynaptics: ftbfs on i386 sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: ksynaptics Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source ksynaptics doesn't build on i386 sid. Build typescript attached. Greetings Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.2-zgsrv Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) typescript.gz Description: Binary data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 4:3.5.2-2+b1 kdelibs4-dev has been binNMUed - ksynaptics builds nicely now. /Sune pgptCqOW74Ghh.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Bug#363375: Acknowledgement (kernel-patch-openswan: Patched linux-source-2.6.16 fails to compile)
I just realized that the exact version of the Debian kernel-source package is missing. It is 2.6.16-7. HTH, Lupe Christoph -- | You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear | | weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest | | bidder. Makes you feel good, doesn't it? | | Rockhound in Armageddon, 1998, about the Space Shuttle | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 360148 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.17 severity 360148 grave Bug#360148: libxklavier10: Adding Arabic to keyboard switcher in GNOME generates an error Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 233767, tagging 260040, tagging 299162, tagging 244792, tagging 343772, tagging 353916
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 tags 233767 + pending Bug#233767: libapache-mod-mp3: Warning on installation There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 260040 + pending Bug#260040: libapache-mod-mp3: [NMU] Please include the following changes There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 299162 + pending Bug#299162: libapache-mod-mp3 must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12 Tags were: fixed patch Tags added: pending tags 244792 + pending Bug#244792: FTBFS: Build-Depends conflict Tags were: fixed pending Tags added: pending tags 343772 + pending Bug#343772: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev Tags were: fixed patch Tags added: pending tags 353916 + pending Bug#353916: libapache-mod-mp3: Please upgrade build depends to libdb4.3-dev Tags were: fixed Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: patch for two RC bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 334156 patch Bug#334156: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on nhc98 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch tags 310009 patch Bug#310009: hat-gch6 is uninstallable There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#355711: marked as done (vim-latexsuite: purging fails, postrm calls non-essential command)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:18:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#355711: fixed in vim-latexsuite 20060325-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: vim-latexsuite Version: 0.20041219-2 When testing vim-latexsuite with piuparts, I get the following error: Purging configuration files for vim-latexsuite ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/vim-latexsuite.postrm: line 4: helpztags: command not found dpkg: error processing vim-latexsuite (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127 The postrm script calls helpztags unconditionally, even in the purge phase. That is not allowed, see policy 7.2, last sentence of the description of Depends. You probably don't need to call it at all during a purge, only a remove. -- Talk is cheap. Whining is actually free. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: vim-latexsuite Source-Version: 20060325-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vim-latexsuite, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: vim-latexsuite_20060325-1.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vim-latexsuite/vim-latexsuite_20060325-1.diff.gz vim-latexsuite_20060325-1.dsc to pool/main/v/vim-latexsuite/vim-latexsuite_20060325-1.dsc vim-latexsuite_20060325-1_all.deb to pool/main/v/vim-latexsuite/vim-latexsuite_20060325-1_all.deb vim-latexsuite_20060325.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/v/vim-latexsuite/vim-latexsuite_20060325.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Franz Pletz [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated vim-latexsuite package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2006 16:35:04 +0200 Source: vim-latexsuite Binary: vim-latexsuite Architecture: source all Version: 20060325-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Franz Pletz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Franz Pletz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: vim-latexsuite - View, edit and compile LaTeX documents from within vim Closes: 301078 307166 308938 312079 323304 350784 355711 Changes: vim-latexsuite (20060325-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * The 'Spring Cleaning' release (Thanks for the suggestion, Artur) * New upstream release (Closes: #350784, #323304) * New maintainer (Closes: #307166) * Updated standards-version to 3.6.2 * Moved to debhelper compatibility level 5 * Made debian/copyright compliant to standards * Updated debian/watch to version 3 (Closes: #312079) * Fixed permissions in debian/rules for debian/bug/script and ftplugin/latex-suite/outline.py (Closes: #308938) * Enhanced description * Moved RELEASE-1.5.txt to the debian directory * Changed version numbering scheme from 0.date to date * Removed useless lintian overrides . [ Debian Vim Maintainers ] * Corrected typos in README.Debian * Simplified debian/rules and added dpatch-rules * Added vim-full as an alternative to vim-python in Depends (all features provided by vim-python are also provided by vim-full) . [ Artur R. Czechowski ] * Patches: + (new) 01_foldingfix.dpatch: properly fixes folding. (See: #246798) + (new) 02_changelog.dpatch - upstream does not provide Changelog in tarball so we fetch it from website manually * debian/control: + Recommends tetex-bin instead of latex (unavailable now) + Depends on vim-common = 1:6.4-004+1 to get vimrc without mapped p key in visual mode (Closes: #301078), additionaly, helpztags has been moved into vim-common long time ago * debian/postinst: + Because vim 6.3 is in stable we do not need ugly hacks related to dpkg-divert, vim 6.1 and old vim-latexsuite + helpztags runs only in configure stage * debian/postrm: + helpztags runs only in remove stage, not in purge (Closes: #355711) Files: 67c727db350f593ee1d71c011f501e78 612 editors extra vim-latexsuite_20060325-1.dsc f7bdb270508a8a88339ff857a52986ff 217436 editors extra vim-latexsuite_20060325.orig.tar.gz 38860b9978506f07da3d244bc3f8ccb5 72422
Bug#362773: marked as done (xautolock conflicts with x11-common)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:32:38 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#362773: fixed in xautolock 1:2.1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xautolock Version: 1:2.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Because xautolock install binaries in /usr/X11R6/bin, it now conflicts with x11-common and therefore is uninstallable. See #362524 and #362200. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.4-zoro.11 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages xautolock depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 1:1.0.0-3 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxss1 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Screen Saver extension library Versions of packages xautolock recommends: ii xlockmore 1:5.21-1 Lock X11 display until password is -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: xautolock Source-Version: 1:2.1-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xautolock, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xautolock_2.1-7.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xautolock/xautolock_2.1-7.diff.gz xautolock_2.1-7.dsc to pool/main/x/xautolock/xautolock_2.1-7.dsc xautolock_2.1-7_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xautolock/xautolock_2.1-7_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xautolock package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:52:38 +0200 Source: xautolock Binary: xautolock Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:2.1-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: xautolock - Program launcher for idle X sessions Closes: 362773 Changes: xautolock (1:2.1-7) unstable; urgency=high . * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix by Steve Langasek * Build against xutils-dev (= 1:1.0.2-2) to get the X11R7 paths, and fix debian/rules to install to /usr/share/man instead of /usr/X11R6/man (Closes: #362773) Files: 7974281ba8b58be1ec327a22ba56c607 629 x11 optional xautolock_2.1-7.dsc 98e36ac454d1c39c057540752dbb625d 5779 x11 optional xautolock_2.1-7.diff.gz d2e62cc8e8ea3866f89ace14758af837 29486 x11 optional xautolock_2.1-7_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFERVQOcaH/YBv43g8RAnZPAJ9sgs9CEDKpgGISBsi5H1sJYO6aqQCgpkdg zHO4S4dGXX2WLcF7z/sJgzo= =7rOQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: tagging 359120, tagging 260042, tagging 244791, tagging 355311
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 tags 359120 + pending Bug#359120: diff for 1.4-8.2 NMU for libapache-mod-random Tags were: patch Tags added: pending tags 260042 + pending Bug#260042: libapache-mod-random: [NMU] Please include the following changes There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 244791 + pending Bug#244791: FTBFS: Build-Depends conflict Tags were: fixed pending Tags added: pending tags 355311 + pending Bug#355311: FTBFS: Build-Depends conflict: libdb4.2-dev vs libdb4.3-dev (apache) Tags were: fixed Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#352690: Patch for haskell-src-exts_0.2-2(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k
package haskell-src-exts tags 352690 patch thanks Hi, I have prepared a patch will will make haskell-src-exts build from source again in pbuilder and (probably) on m68k and amd64 as well. Greetings Arjan diff -Naur haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/changelog /home/arjan/temp/haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/changelog --- haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/changelog 2006-04-18 23:14:14.0 +0200 +++ /home/arjan/temp/haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/changelog 2006-04-18 23:13:12.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +haskell-src-exts (0.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * debian/rules: adjust sed expression to fix FTBFS. (Closes: #352690) + * src/trhsx/trhsx.cabal: added base and haskell98 to the Build- +Depends. + + -- Arjan Oosting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:13:12 +0200 + haskell-src-exts (0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low * Recompile against ghc 6.4.1. diff -Naur haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/rules /home/arjan/temp/haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/rules --- haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/rules 2006-04-18 23:14:14.0 +0200 +++ /home/arjan/temp/haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/rules 2006-04-19 00:02:24.0 +0200 @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ version=0.2 +ghc6_version := $(shell ghc6 --numeric-version) + configure: configure-stamp configure-stamp: dh_testdir @@ -28,7 +30,7 @@ dh_haskell_prep -plibghc6-src-exts-dev; \ dh_haskell_build -plibghc6-src-exts-dev;) - sed s,/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/lib/haskell-src-exts-$(version),`pwd`/src/haskell-src-exts/dist/build,g src/haskell-src-exts/.installed-pkg-config debian/tmp-installed-pkg + sed s,/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/lib/haskell-src-exts-$(version)\(/ghc-$(ghc6_version)\)\?,`pwd`/src/haskell-src-exts/dist/build,g src/haskell-src-exts/.installed-pkg-config debian/tmp-installed-pkg echo '[]' debian/tmp-package-conf ghc-pkg -f debian/tmp-package-conf register debian/tmp-installed-pkg diff -Naur haskell-src-exts-0.2/src/trhsx/trhsx.cabal /home/arjan/temp/haskell-src-exts-0.2/src/trhsx/trhsx.cabal --- haskell-src-exts-0.2/src/trhsx/trhsx.cabal 2005-04-08 17:17:29.0 +0200 +++ /home/arjan/temp/haskell-src-exts-0.2/src/trhsx/trhsx.cabal 2006-04-18 23:06:19.0 +0200 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ License: PublicDomain Author: Niklas Broberg Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: haskell-src-exts +Build-Depends: base, haskell98, haskell-src-exts Executable: trhsx Main-Is: Hsx.hs signature.asc Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
Processed: Patch for haskell-src-exts_0.2-2(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package haskell-src-exts Ignoring bugs not assigned to: haskell-src-exts tags 352690 patch Bug#352690: haskell-src-exts_0.2-2(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 361770 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 361770 normal Bug#361770: After few hours amule make Xorg use 100% CPU Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363147: libxklavier10: Debian patch xorg_xkb_path.patch breaks libxklavier
Hey Marcelo, Wow, this is pretty embarrasing. I didn't have a fully upgraded box at the time of the upload, so got 4 testers on IRC to check the package for me. They said it was ok; my half upgraded system seemed ok as well, and then I went for easter vacation until today. It's weird nobody else has submitted this before, but thanks for the analysis and patch. Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#362074: Raising the severity again
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: block 362074 by 363267 Bug#362074: Please install to /usr/ instead of /usr/X11R6 Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 363267 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to libcommoncpp2 libcommoncpp2-1.3-2 libcommoncpp2-dev libcommoncpp2-doc ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.18 package libcommoncpp2 libcommoncpp2-1.3-2 libcommoncpp2-dev libcommoncpp2-doc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libcommoncpp2-doc libcommoncpp2-dev libcommoncpp2 libcommoncpp2-1.3-2 tags 360492 + pending Bug#360492: libcommoncpp2-dev: pointer.h:55: error: invalid function declaration There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merge twinkle...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 362440 important Bug#362440: libccext2-1.3.so.1: cannot open shared object file Severity set to `important'. merge 362440 362583 Bug#362440: libccext2-1.3.so.1: cannot open shared object file Bug#362583: twinkle fails to start with new version of libcommoncpp2-1.3c2a Merged 362440 362583. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363147: marked as done (libxklavier10: Debian patch xorg_xkb_path.patch breaks libxklavier)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:17:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#363147: fixed in libxklavier 2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libxklavier10 Version: 2.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: patch This fixes a bug that has been bothering a rather large ammount of people. AFAICS libxklavier can't do zilch without this fix. The patch: --- libxklavier-2.2.orig/libxklavier/xklavier_config_xkb.c +++ libxklavier-2.2/libxklavier/xklavier_config_xkb.c @@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ #endif /* For bad X servers we hold our own copy */ -#define XML_CFG_FALLBACK_PATH ( DATA_DIR /xfree86.xml ) +#define XML_CFG_FALLBACK_PATH ( DATA_DIR /xorg.xml ) -#define XKBCOMP ( XKB_BIN_BASE /xkbcomp ) +#define XKBCOMP xkbcomp #define XK_XKB_KEYS #include X11/keysymdef.h ignores this code in the library (libxklavier/xklavier_config_xkb.c): case 0: /* child */ XklDebug( 160, Executing %s\n, XKBCOMP ); XklDebug( 160, %s %s %s %s %s %s %s\n, XKBCOMP, XKBCOMP, -I, -I XKB_BASE, -xkm, xkbFN, xkmFN ); execl( XKBCOMP, XKBCOMP, -I, -I XKB_BASE, -xkm, xkbFN, xkmFN, NULL ); XklDebug( 0, Could not exec %s: %d\n, XKBCOMP, errno ); exit( 1 ); by fixing the program not to use a hardcoded path you have broken it, since execl(3) will not search the user's path for the executable (please read the manpage). Replace execl(3) by execlp(3). I'm really amazed that noone has spotted this since 2.2-2 was uploaded and I'm even more amazed by the fact that neither the patch author nor the package maintainer noticed this, since the library tests (in the tests directory) fail with a rather clear error message. The problem was introduced by the fact that xkb-data does not ship that /usr/share/X11/xkb/xkbcomp - /usr/bin/xkbcomp symlink anymore. This was removed more than a month ago... are you guys using current sid to build and test your packages? Cat the attached patch to the current one and that should do the trick. Marcelo diff -Nur libxklavier-2.2/libxklavier/xklavier_config_xkb.c libxklavier-2.2.new/libxklavier/xklavier_config_xkb.c --- libxklavier-2.2/libxklavier/xklavier_config_xkb.c 2006-04-17 14:42:37.0 -0600 +++ libxklavier-2.2.new/libxklavier/xklavier_config_xkb.c 2006-04-17 14:43:22.0 -0600 @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ XklDebug( 160, Executing %s\n, XKBCOMP ); XklDebug( 160, %s %s %s %s %s %s %s\n, XKBCOMP, XKBCOMP, -I, -I XKB_BASE, -xkm, xkbFN, xkmFN ); - execl( XKBCOMP, XKBCOMP, -I, -I XKB_BASE, -xkm, xkbFN, xkmFN, NULL ); + execlp( XKBCOMP, XKBCOMP, -I, -I XKB_BASE, -xkm, xkbFN, xkmFN, NULL ); XklDebug( 0, Could not exec %s: %d\n, XKBCOMP, errno ); exit( 1 ); default: ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libxklavier Source-Version: 2.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libxklavier, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libxklavier-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libx/libxklavier/libxklavier-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb libxklavier10_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libx/libxklavier/libxklavier10_2.2-3_i386.deb libxklavier_2.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libx/libxklavier/libxklavier_2.2-3.diff.gz libxklavier_2.2-3.dsc to pool/main/libx/libxklavier/libxklavier_2.2-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libxklavier package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:45:24 +0200 Source: libxklavier Binary: libxklavier10 libxklavier-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Filip Van Raemdonck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libxklavier-dev - Development files for libxklavier libxklavier10 - X Keyboard Extension high-level API Closes: 363147 Changes: libxklavier
