Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 208344 important
Bug#208344: lots of CORBA errors
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
severity 208344 important
thanks
Well, I looked at the e-mail logcheck just sent me, and I found this:
gconfd (me-19567): Failed to get lock for daemon, exiting: Failed to
lock '/tmp/gconfd-me/lock/ior': probably another process has the lock, or
your operating system has NFS file locking miscon
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:37:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in CVS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Hello,
On 06-Apr-22 17:39, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Did you do anything special to get imake to work?
>
> $ fakeroot debian/rules binary
> dh_testdir
> xmkmf -a
> mv -f Makefile Makefile.bak
> imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/lib/X11/config
> Imakefile.c:39: error: Imake.tmpl: No such file or direc
Package: sasl2-bin
Version: 2.1.19.dfsg1-0.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
invoke-rc.d: initscript saslauthd, action "start" failed.
dpkg: error processing sasl2-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encounter
To further underline what I have been saying, I object to any of my
(currently embarrassingly minor) contributions to the Debian web page
to be licensed under the terms of the proposed "Debian Free
Documentation License" or any other license which has been specially
drafted for the Debian web page
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:47:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña:
>
> > Copyright 1997-2006 Software in the Public Interest, Inc. All rights
> > reserved.
>
> Is this correct? Have all contributors assigned copyright to SPI?
Contributor assignment and the lice
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:40:11AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The only change I made to it was substituting "FreeBSD Documentation
> > Project" for "Debian Project".
>
> You've sent two totally different licenses to the list so far; I was
> refering specifically to the license which was attac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 360843 + fixed
Bug#360843: manpages-dev tries to overwrite files from modutils
(create_module.2.gz)
Tags were: patch
Bug#361084: package manpages-dev in unstable is broken
Bug#361369: conflicting files with modutils
Bug#361958: modutils conflicts w
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:02:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363574: fixed in libforms1 1.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
I tried just removing the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 setting from
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd, and also from
/usr/share/initrd-tools/scripts/e2fsprogs, which also sets it, and
that seems to work ok on both 2.4 and 2.6 (generating initrd for 2.4
kernel).
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > xmkmf -a
> > imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/lib/X11/config
> > Imakefile.c:39: error: Imake.tmpl: No such file or directory
> > imake: Exit code 1.
> > Stop.
> > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
> >
> > Any idea what's wrong?
>
>
> ---
tags 364359 pending
thanks
* Bj?rn Heide ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 9.1.1
>
> $ dpkg -L firefox|grep /debian
> /debian
> /debian/firefox
> /debian/firefox/usr
> /debian/firefox/usr/share
> /debian/firefox
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361749: fixed in shishi 0.0.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 363978 rssh: broken command line parsing
Bug#363978: (no subject)
Changed Bug title.
> tags 363978 + security sarge
Bug#363978: rssh: broken command line parsing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security, sarge
> severity 363978 critical
Bu
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334067: fixed in python2.4 2.4.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
How is this bug still open?
Should we bring in the Technical Committee? They could make the decision
about where the man page belongs. http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte
A request to the ctte should include the list of all the affected files.
Nick Lewycky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 364359 confirmed
Bug#364359: FHS violation: /debian/firefox/usr/share/pixmaps/firefox.xpm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 the mental interface of
Peter S Galbraith told:
> Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: libforms1
> > Version: 1.0-6lxtec1
> > Followup-For: Bug #363574
> >
> >
> > I needed a modified xforms to build lyx. Please find attached patch
> > for the debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 364338 LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is broken
Bug#364338: kernel-image-2.4.27-3-k7: Failed to create initrd image.
Changed Bug title.
> tag 364338 d-i
Bug#364338: LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> severity 364338 serious
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:53:59PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> tags 364264 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hi
>
> I can not reproduce this on latest etch release. Please specify
> what you have used when you get this problem.
I used sid/unstable.
See buildd logs at:
http://buildd.debian.org/bui
Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libforms1
> Version: 1.0-6lxtec1
> Followup-For: Bug #363574
>
>
> I needed a modified xforms to build lyx. Please find attached patch
> for the debian dir.
Thanks for the comprehensive patch. I had another one with bug #363574.
I didn't
The Roxen4 Package continues to shutdown instances of mysql.
apt-get install roxen4
apt-get install mysql-server4.1
Each week, cron initiates mysql shutdown...
Thanks
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:47:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363494: fixed in xorg-server 1:1.0.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364013: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-via 1:0.1.33.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:47:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363494: fixed in xorg-server 1:1.0.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: libforms1
Version: 1.0-6lxtec1
Followup-For: Bug #363574
I needed a modified xforms to build lyx. Please find attached patch
for the debian dir.
Thx
Elimar
--
"Talking much about oneself can also
be a means to conceal oneself."
-Friedrich Nietzsche
debian.diff.gz
Desc
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.1
$ dpkg -L firefox|grep /debian
/debian
/debian/firefox
/debian/firefox/usr
/debian/firefox/usr/share
/debian/firefox/usr/share/pixmaps
/debian/firefox/usr/share/pixmaps/firefox.xpm
The two leftmost path ele
tags 363303 +unreproducible +moreinfo
severity 363302 important
thanks
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 01:21:02PM +0200, Tobias Diaz wrote:
> Package: libx11-6
> Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> When migrating to X.Org 7 in Debian unstable, X serv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 363303 +unreproducible +moreinfo
Unknown tag/s: +moreinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fi
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the attached patch changes debian/rules to install files in /usr/lib and
> /usr/include/X11 instead of /usr/X11R6/lib and /usr/X11R6/include/X11.
>
> Regards
> Andreas Jochens
Thanks again!
Did you do anything special to get imake to work
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:50:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364353: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7: Fails to mount root file
system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359639: fixed in beast 0.6.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 364248 serious
Bug#364248: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-fr: Translation out of date
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:18:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358754: fixed in helix-player 1.0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:17:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364267: fixed in epiphany-browser 2.14.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 13:44 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Package: ncurses
> Severity: serious
> Version: 5.5-1
>
>
> David Turner noticed the following, and I just wanted to make sure it
> was kept track of in Debian as well. As you can tell, it's already
> been forwarded upstream.
Upstream g
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:18:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339469: fixed in helix-player 1.0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-7bpo1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
It says "Waiting for root file system" and then it stalls.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-k7
Locale: LANG=en_DK, LC_CTYPE=e
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:08:36PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> The second patch I sent has been reported to fail by other 64bit testers so
> I've got - what I hope - is the proper solution and it's tested against the
> original source.
it works now :-)
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:18:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337632: fixed in matchbox-panel 0.9.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 341709 wishlist
Bug#341709: typo3: New upstream version available (3.8.1)
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> tag 341709 -security
Bug#341709: typo3: New upstream version available (3.8.1)
Tags were: security
Tags removed: security
> clone 341709 -
severity 341709 wishlist
tag 341709 -security
clone 341709 -1 -2
severity -1 important
retitle -1 Mail forms can be used to send spam
forwarded -1
http://typo3.org/teams/security/security-bulletins/typo3-20050307-1/
severity -2 grave
retitle -2 Remote command execution, arbitrary file viewing [CVE
Package: ncurses
Severity: serious
Version: 5.5-1
David Turner noticed the following, and I just wanted to make sure it
was kept track of in Debian as well. As you can tell, it's already
been forwarded upstream.
| From: David Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 355827 fuse: new kernels don't work with sarge's userland
Bug#355827: sshfs: does not work
Changed Bug title.
> tag 355827 +sarge
Bug#355827: fuse: new kernels don't work with sarge's userland
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
>
End of
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Hubert Chan wrote:
Can you try using the attached file as config/config.align.c? I've just
added a call to "puts" to force the compiler to not optimize out the
assignments. (Fortunately, the compiler isn't smart enough to know that
the assignments are still useless.)
I t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:06:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
tags 364264 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi
I can not reproduce this on latest etch release. Please specify
what you have used when you get this problem.
Regards,
// Ola
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:20:49PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: directvnc
> Version: 0.7.5-7.1
> Severity: serious
>
> H
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:33:07 -0700 (PDT), Jurij Smakov said:
> Hi, On sparc this clearly looks like an alignment problem. The
> decode() function mentioned in the backtrace above is supposed to do
> the right thing depending on whether alignment on word boundary for
> ints is required. The need fo
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:06:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:06:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
tag 362876 pending
thanks
Attached is the patch for the NMU which I have uploaded to the 3 day
delay queue. [Yes, it's 76, not 67 for those following along at
home...]
Don Armstrong
--
No amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free
[...] You can't conquer a free man; the m
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:06:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:06:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
On Friday 21 April 2006 11:36 pm, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Could you test this patch for me?
>
> I would like to, but the patch does not apply. Investigating by hand,
> it seems the diff is against an even newer version than in 0.
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:06:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:32:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364294: fixed in sane-backends 1.0.17-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hello,
I would like more notice from you. How could we know that you have
prepared a new package ? In addition it is a RC bug. That's why, i did a
NMU quickly.
I thought my patch was good and works well. But apparently, it isn't for
the update. So, i'm sorry. I try to make my best for this
tag 362867 pending
thanks
Attached is the patch for the NMU which I have uploaded to the 3 day
delay queue.
Don Armstrong
--
No amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free
[...] You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him.
-- Robert Heinlein _Revolt in 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
severity 363998 important
thanks
Il giorno 20/apr/06, alle ore 23:36, Christoph Kaminski ha scritto:
Package: squid
Version: 2.5.13-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
What unrelated software is broken by this bug? Since
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:35:55 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 03:34:58PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > Package: lessdisks-terminal
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 10.7.4
> >
> > debian/lessdisks-terminal.postinst:
> > if ! egrep "postinst_hook|postrm_hook
I have experienced this problem too, but I found the solution to be found in
bug #363664 which contains a link to bug #362894.
Changing the symbolic link did the trick.
I propose to merge these bug-reports. The solution should be to make sure that
the link points to the right place.
Links for th
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:12:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line can't reproduce that bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
> Yes, we do, but
>
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libstdc++.so
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23 Apr 6 02:08
> /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libstdc++.so -> ../../../libstdc++.so.6
Oh, I was thinking there were separate libraries for each GCC version.
I've had to live with this for
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:47:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364243: fixed in udev 0.090-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hello Micah,
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 05:03:44PM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
> It is known that these architectures which failed these tests, pass the
> tests that are provided by upstream, in the kernel. There is a high
> degree of probability that these tests fail, not because of a problem on
Ok
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:47:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364243: fixed in udev 0.090-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:47:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364241: fixed in udev 0.090-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:47:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364241: fixed in udev 0.090-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 363998 important
Bug#363998: squid: fails to start
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:50:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363296: vnc4server: could not open default font 'fixed'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:50:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363296: vnc4server: could not open default font 'fixed'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
tags 309932 +upstream
thanks mate
Hi
This bug is known upstream as bug 307524 [1]. As boot-admin also breaks
the Debian specific autoconfiguring the kernel list through update-grub
I think boot-admin should be removed from the package till at least that
is fixed...
If you don't react I'll intend
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 309932 +upstream
Bug#309932: boot-admin should not be in unstable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> thanks mate
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:35:55 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote:
> This bug is marked RC since sometime now, we need to move on.
Yep - thanks for pushing: I'm looking at it now :-)
> Note that debian/lessdisks-xterminal.postinst has a similar bug:
>
> debian/lessdisks-xterminal.postinst:
> echo "$in
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:22:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346115: oh...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 11:55:58 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ipe now uses %z
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
John David Anglin writes:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gmp-4.2.dfsg/tests/cxx$ g++ -Wall test-throw.cc &&
> > > ./a.out
> > > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libgcc_s.so.4, needed by
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libstdc++.so, may conflict with
> > > libgcc_s.so.2
>
> I'm puzzled about this. It s
These are the files that cause the bug.
trackback_tools.py is the file as it is provided by the package
trackback_tools.py.mine is the file as I have fixed it
--
Alper Çugun
##
#
# trackback_tools.py
#
# Copyright (c) 200
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:40:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360542: Announce of NMU for 360542
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicolas Duboc wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I'm going to upload a NMU of argouml to fix this bug by applying patch
> provided by Andreas.
>
> As we are in an BSP period, I'm uploading directly to the archive.
>
> Below is the patch of the NMU.
I'm ok for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 364195 1:1.2.1.dfsg-3
Bug#364195: CVE-2006-1827: arbitrary code execution
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.2.1.dfsg-3.
> found 364195 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2
Bug#364195: CVE-2006-1827: arbitrary code execution
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.0.7.df
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gmp-4.2.dfsg/tests/cxx$ g++ -Wall test-throw.cc &&
> > ./a.out
> > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libgcc_s.so.4, needed by
> > /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libstdc++.so, may conflict with
> > libgcc_s.so.2
I'm puzzled about this. It seems like libstdc++ for GCC 4.0.3 was
bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 335473 +upstream
Bug#335473: cricket: Completely broken with latest rrdtool package 1.2.11-0.4
Tags were: sid etch
Tags added: upstream
> thanks mate
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
... I just forgot about this bug report of mine, however, the problem doesn't
show up anymore on current testing versions, so please close my bug
report. :)
lg
Erik
pgpwCboI5Pvcz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
tags 335473 +upstream
thanks mate
Hi
This bug should get fixed upstream, though upstream is not very active
as at least there was nothing significant done the last 11 monts on
sf.net... maybe this package should just be removed?
Though it seems that there was no upstream bug opened about this is
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:59:50 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360996: fixed in mono 1.1.13.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña:
> Copyright 1997-2006 Software in the Public Interest, Inc. All rights reserved.
Is this correct? Have all contributors assigned copyright to SPI?
>2. Redistributions in compiled form (transformed to other DTDs, converted
>to HTML, PDF, PostScript, RTF
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 211156 serious
Bug#211156: libsasl2 has configuration files in /usr/lib
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Subject: zope-coreblog: Product broken by bad python file
Package: zope-coreblog
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The last two times that I have upgraded COREBlog the Product has
failed to
be imported becau
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> tags 353057 - experimental
Bug#353057: anjuta: crashes on startup with a SIGSEGV
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:13:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364289: udev: fails to configure
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 10:00:04AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > $ ldd a.out
> > libstdc++.so.6 =3D> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x40575000)
> > libm.so.6 =3D> /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4046e000)
> > libgcc_s.so.2 =3D> /lib/libgcc_s.so.2 (0x40068000)
> > libc.so.6 =3D> /li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> try rm -rf ~/.config/MonoDevelop
> and see if that crash still happens.
That worked! :)
> Sometimes the configuration files gets borked when you play the UI
> layout.
Is there a reason why?
Thank you for your rm -rf suggestion!
David
- --
Linux
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> If replacing the line with its correct form fixed it, then it would be
> a thinkpad-base bug:
>
> KERNEL=="thinkpad", MODE="0664", GROUP="thinkpad"
>
>
> 0.090-2 introduced some code which exposes incorrect usage of =/==
> (see the Debian changelog for details).
OK,
Package: wmaker
Version: 0.92.0-5.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Directly after upgrading to X11R7, wmaker simply segfaults on startup,
giving me the familiar crash dialog. I'm not really sure why it would do
this, but it's reproducible every time, so I'd guess something
Package: udev
Version: 0.090-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to configure
Upgrading udev from 0.087-2 to 0.090-2 gives:
Unpacking udev (from .../udev_0.090-2_amd64.deb) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 89: /lib/udev/write_net_rules: No such
file or directory
dpkg: error proc
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364274: fixed in xfm 1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:48:09PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Should we decide to change the license, we should either use the MIT
> > license if we don't want it to be copyleft, or the GPL if we do. A
> > custom license is not somet
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363116: fixed in xfm 1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
