Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded #409819
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1469811group_id=9226atid=109226
Bug#409819: snoopy: segfaults on amd64
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
forwarded #409819
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1469811group_id=9226atid=109226
thanks
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:06:36AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
I have missed passing this upstream. I'd like to do so later today,
Done.
Greetings
Marc
--
Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le samedi 24 février 2007 17:02, vous avez écrit :
Frank, if you think this can be solved cleanly in mediawiki1.7 why don't
you just put up a complete patch instead of only one of the things to do
? If then it looks good, I would apply it happily.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
You say that while later on you claimed not to understand everything about
the
package (update script). Don't you have the impression that this judgement
is
also based on incomplete information on the package ?
Of
vorlon wrote:
Anyway, the bug is still RC in nature. Marc, do you expect to have time to
work on this, or shall I consider an NMU?
I have committed the attached patch and have pointed upstream here.
How to continue?
- upload to experimental to allow for autobuild and testing?
- wait for
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:44:37AM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il giorno lun, 26/02/2007 alle 01.31 -0500, Jamie ffolliott ha scritto:
I'm on i386. A binary package is ok. Thanks, I will have to try sometime
tomorrow or in the evening.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
reopen 411969
Bug#411969: installs /usr/bin/platex, which is also in package ptex-bin
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:04:24AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
I have committed the attached patch and have pointed upstream here.
Stupid me forgot the attachment.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | I don't trust
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
You say that while later on you claimed not to understand everything about
the
package (update script). Don't you have the impression that this judgement
is
also based on
Package: python-uno
Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5
Severity: serious
Trying to upgrade my system yesterday I got the following error:
Następujące pakiety mają niespełnione zależności:
python-uno: Wymaga: openoffice.org-core (= 2.0.4.dfsg.2-4) ale
2.0.4.dfsg.2-5 ma zostać zainstalowany
E: Niespełnione
Hi Steve
Il giorno lun, 26/02/2007 alle 00.54 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:44:37AM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il giorno lun, 26/02/2007 alle 01.31 -0500, Jamie ffolliott ha scritto:
I'm on i386. A binary package is ok. Thanks, I will have to try sometime
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
reassign 392235 thinkpad-source
Bug#392235: thinkpad: Kernel module doesn't compile with 2.6.18 (the kernel for
etch)
Bug reassigned from package `thinkpad' to `thinkpad-source'.
severity 412159 wishlist
thanks
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:19:07PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2007-02-24 21:56:29 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
and as said in my bug report, a 'must' has been violated (local
changes *must* be preserved during a package upgrade).
You're citing a
Package: slapd
Version: 2.3.30-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Slapd fails to start after the update from 2.3.30-2 to 2.3.30-4. After setting
the loglevel to 2 in slapd.conf, the following log entries appear in
/var/log/syslog:
bdb(dc=xxx,dc=xxx): operation not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 412159 serious
Bug#412159: fontconfig upgrade changed the local configuration (enable_bitmaps)
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:04:24AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
vorlon wrote:
Anyway, the bug is still RC in nature. Marc, do you expect to have time to
work on this, or shall I consider an NMU?
I have committed the attached patch and have pointed upstream here.
How to continue?
- upload
I can even reproduce the problem after a downgrade to 2.4.2-1 and
upgrade to the latest version:
vin:/home/vlefevre# dpkg -s fontconfig-config | grep Version
Version: 2.4.2-1
vin:/home/vlefevre# dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config
[setting enable bitmapped fonts to yes]
vin:/home/vlefevre# ls -l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
# submitter is deaf
severity 412159 wishlist
Bug#412159: fontconfig upgrade changed the local configuration (enable_bitmaps)
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 412159 wishlist
Bug#412159: fontconfig upgrade changed the local configuration (enable_bitmaps)
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
.. and of course, delete catalina.out file (and the creation of it in
the init.d script) - it's annoying when you do grep ... * and it hangs!
Adrian
--
Adrian Bridgett - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key available on public key servers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 412474 important
Bug#412474: slapd fails to start after update from 2.3.30-2 to 2.3.30-4
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
End of message, stopping processing here.
severity 412159 important
quit
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:15:59AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
If you want to keep bitmaps enabled, you can:
- manually create the /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-yes-bitmaps.conf link and delete
the 70-no-bitmaps.conf link, or
- use dpkg-reconfigure
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
# sigh, yes, confirmed
severity 412159 serious
Bug#412159: fontconfig upgrade changed the local configuration (enable_bitmaps)
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 412159 important
Bug#412159: fontconfig upgrade changed the local configuration (enable_bitmaps)
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
.. and of course, delete catalina.out file (and the creation of it in
the init.d script) - it's annoying when you do grep ... * and it hangs!
Yes, that pipe is going away as soon as I get my syslogging code in jsvc to a
working state...
pgp9pvuclJuBe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Lionel,
I'd like for this to show up in my TODO for etch list, so RC
severity (makes package unsuitable for release in maintainer's
opinion
Well, making it 'serious' causes it to show up not just in your TODO list,
but that of the release team's as well. Do you have any sort of estimate
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#395101: fixed in tin 1:1.9.2+20070201-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 412470 important
Bug#412470: Inconsistency between python-uno and openoffice.org-core
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
tags 412470 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#412470: Inconsistency between python-uno and openoffice.org-core
There
severity 412470 important
tags 412470 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:27:41AM +0100, zefciu wrote:
Package: python-uno
Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5
Severity: serious
Trying to upgrade my system yesterday I got the following error:
Następujące pakiety mają niespełnione
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#409819: fixed in snoopy 1.3-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:10:18AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
I'd like for this to show up in my TODO for etch list, so RC
severity (makes package unsuitable for release in maintainer's
opinion
Well, making it 'serious' causes it to show up not just in your TODO
list, but that of the
Hi Jos,
Hi C.
It sounds like it crashes on the first file it sees! Does it actually
index any file properly?
Right, I don't think it indexes any file. The only file that is created in
the ~/.strigi/clucene is the segments file.
C.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Il giorno sab, 20/01/2007 alle 17.58 -0500, Jamie ffolliott ha scritto:
Package: libpam-ldap
Version: 180-1.4
After an apt-get upgrade, the libpam-ldap packate updated, and in doing so
it rewrote parts of the /etc/pam_ldap.conf file as follows
- rewrote host, base, ldap_version,
Package: libcgicc1-dev
Version: 3.2.3-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tag: patch
Almost all headers contain
#pragma interface
and at the same time implement constructors like
inline CgiInput() {}
which just doesn't fit together. Trying to compile things with g++ will
Hi,
can you please try if this is also reproducible with the seahorse
version from experimental (0.9.92-1)?
Also, if you can reproduce it, please rebuild seahorse with debug
symbols and install debug packages for glib, libgnomeui, libgnome,
libc...
I can't reproduce it here, everything works
Package: linux-patch-exec-shield
Version: 1:2.6.20-1
Followup-For: Bug #392464
This patch is failing with the current 2.6.18 kernel on mm/mprotect.c.
The last two hunks for this file fail. It looks like there's a new
version on Ingo's site that fixes this.
James
-- System Information:
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 411969 texlive-lang-polish
Bug#411969: installs /usr/bin/platex, which is also in package ptex-bin
Bug reassigned from package `texlive-extra-utils' to `texlive-lang-polish'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi Jos and Debian Bugzilla,
I've attached output from valgrind after running:
#valgrind xmlindexer kontact.desktop 21valgrindOutput
There are many messages such as
Loading `libextractor_exiv2' plugin failed: libextractor_exiv2.so: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or
Ah, libextractor! that is a problem causer. Please dont use it.
2007/2/26, CSights [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Jos and Debian Bugzilla,
I've attached output from valgrind after running:
#valgrind xmlindexer kontact.desktop 21valgrindOutput
There are many messages such as
Loading
Package: python-scipy
Version: 0.5.2-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
python-scipy depends on libc6 (= 2.5) which is not yet availible in
unstable. Error from apt-get install python-scipy:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
python-scipy: Depends: libc6 (=
[1][logo_bsch.gif] [sp.gif] [sp.gif] [esquina_utilidades.gif]
[sp.gif]
[sp.gif]
[sp.gif] [sp.gif]
[esquina_botonera.gif]
[sp.gif] [sp.gif]
[sp.gif] [sp.gif]
[sp.gif]
[sp.gif]
[sp.gif]
[sp.gif] [sp.gif] [sp.gif] [tabla_esq_sup_der.gif] [sp.gif] [sp.gif]
[sp.gif]
Hi,
Removing the libextractor... package stops the segfault.
But still there are many more problems with strigi.
For example, when strigi encounters an .doc/.pdf file, it uses
wvWare/pdftotext. But it never exits from these programs. And there the
indexing stops. I mean the status page says
Package: nscd
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5
Severity: serious
the dependency lines of nscd somehow differ
Package: nscd
- Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4
+ Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5
Section: admin
Priority: optional
Architecture: alpha
- Depends: libc6.1 (= 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4)
- Replaces:
clone 392464 -1
retitle -1 update etch version after kernel 2.6.18.dfsg.1 migrates to testing
submitter -1 !
severity -1 wishlist
found -1 1:2.6.18-2
tag 392464 pending
thanks
This patch is failing with the current 2.6.18 kernel on mm/mprotect.c.
Yes, thanks for the notice.
I'll make an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 392464 -1
Bug#392464: kernel-patch-exec-shield: Needs to be updated for 2.6.18
Bug 392464 cloned as bug 412563.
retitle -1 update etch version after kernel 2.6.18.dfsg.1 migrates to testing
Bug#412563: kernel-patch-exec-shield: Needs to be
[1][logo_bsch.gif] [sp.gif] [sp.gif] [esquina_utilidades.gif]
[sp.gif]
[sp.gif]
[sp.gif] [sp.gif]
[esquina_botonera.gif]
[sp.gif] [sp.gif]
[sp.gif] [sp.gif]
[sp.gif]
[sp.gif]
[sp.gif]
[sp.gif] [sp.gif] [sp.gif] [tabla_esq_sup_der.gif] [sp.gif] [sp.gif]
[sp.gif]
Package: gnuplot
Version: 4.2~rc4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
| Automatic build of gnuplot_4.2~rc4-1 on ds10 by sbuild/alpha 98-farm
| Build started at 20070212-1435
| **
[...]
| Checking correctness of
tags 412281 + patch
stop
Rebuilding against libapt-pkg-dev 0.6.46.4 seems fixed this for me.
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, Leamington Spa, UKGPG: 0x634F9A20
--- debian/control.orig 2007-02-26 20:23:27.0 +
+++ debian/control 2007-02-26 20:23:41.0
Package: haxe
Version: 20070224-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Heya,
| Automatic build of haxe_20070224-1 on swawa.farm.ftbfs.de by sbuild/hppa
98-farm
| Build started at 20070225-1039
| **
[...]
| ocamlc
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:34:51PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Could you please explain once more what happens if you put your complete
URI, like ldaps:/// when prompted for the host? According to the
scritp, when an uri is inserted, then the host is commented out and the
uri directive is
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46.4
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
All d-i installs are broken today, because a new version of
debian-archive-keyring exposed a bug in apt-key, causing it to remove
the wrong key during a debootstrap, leaving the system without the
current etch automatic signing key.
This
Package: zatacka
Version: 0.1.5dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
SDL_prim.c contains the following at the top of the file:
* Copyright (C) 2003-2005 Ryan McGuigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* See the included 'COPYING' file for license information.
*
however the .orig.tar.gz does not contain a file named
Package: zatacka
Severity: serious
Hi maintainer,
as you know, zatacka does include the SDL_prim.h and SDL_prim.c files
from a different project. Unfortunately, there is no license information
attached to these two files, making them undistributable.
Please think about re-import them from the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 412281 + patch
Bug#412281: wajig: fails to run with import apt_pkg error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 412156 grave
Bug#412156: apt-key update deletes legitimate keys
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
#Original poster suggested a patch
tag 412156 patch
Bug#412156: apt-key update deletes legitimate keys
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
merge 412571 412573
severity 412571 important
thanks
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 03:43:21PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
SDL_prim.c contains the following at the top of the file:
* Copyright (C) 2003-2005 Ryan McGuigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* See the included 'COPYING' file for license
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 412571 412573
Bug#412571: zatacka: missing license for SDL_prim.c
Bug#412573: SDL_prim.* has no (valid) license
Merged 412571 412573.
severity 412571 important
Bug#412571: zatacka: missing license for SDL_prim.c
Bug#412573: SDL_prim.* has no
the real issue is that there is no longer a /etc/init.d/inetd in debian, netkit
has been removed and its two replacements use their own init script names,
applying the patch would remove the errors but would just mean that inetd would
not be restarted.
based on initial testing (i'd like a
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:17:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#411912: fixed in zd1211-firmware 2.16.0.0-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 412571 serious
Bug#412571: zatacka: missing license for SDL_prim.c
Bug#412573: SDL_prim.* has no (valid) license
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 412572 + patch
Bug#412572: apt-key is broken, passes garbage to gpg to remove keys, and
currently breaks d-i
Tags were: d-i patch
Bug#412156: apt-key update deletes legitimate keys
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
tags 412572 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my apt 0.6.46.4-0.1 NMU.
(Note that your build process tends to generate messy diffs.)
--
see shy jo
diff -Nru /home/joey/tmp/tlMoSSRhZe/apt-0.6.46.4/cmdline/apt-key /home/joey/tmp/a79SZV9Dc3/apt-0.6.46.4/cmdline/apt-key
---
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#412572: fixed in apt 0.6.46.4-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 412571 minor
Bug#412571: zatacka: missing license for SDL_prim.c
Bug#412573: SDL_prim.* has no (valid) license
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
severity 412571 minor
thanks
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:25:02PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Attaching the license information to individual files is *not* required.
I beg to differ. The two files are not written by the upstream author of
zatacka and imported from a
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#412572: fixed in apt 0.6.46.4-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
-Original Message-
From: Steve Langasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 3:39 PM
To: Giuseppe Sacco; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jamie ffolliott
Subject: Bug#407746: libpam-ldap upgrade breaks pam_ldap.conf
and can't login
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:34:51PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 412409 pending
thanks
Hi Frank,
The fix for #412409 is now in SVN and will be used in the next upload.
Thank you for taking time to investigate the build failure, even for a
package that claims (wrongly) that sparc is not supported. As a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 412409 pending
Bug#412409: firebird1.5_1.5.4.4910rc1+20070131-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS:
tries to use -march on sparc
There were no tags set.
Warning: Unknown package 'firebird1.5'
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
notfound 370186 0.5.8.1-6.1
close 370186 0.5.8.1-6.1
clone 370186 -1
severity -1 normal
reassign -1 release-notes
quit
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:03:25AM -0900, James Zuelow wrote:
With a CD or DVD in the drive, it spins constantly. Is the fix adding
documentation to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfound 370186 0.5.8.1-6.1
Bug#370186: hal: HAL keeps CD drive spinning constantly
Bug marked as not found in version 0.5.8.1-6.1.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
close 370186 0.5.8.1-6.1
Bug#370186: hal: HAL keeps CD drive
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:33:34 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#412562: nscd uninstallable on alpha and ia64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi Jos and Debian bug,
I believe the segfault is caused by some wrongness in the
/usr/lib/strigi/strigita_kfile.so file.
strigi-plugins includes two libraries /usr/lib/strigi/strigita_kfile.so
and /usr/lib/strigi/strigita_libextractor.so .
I get a segfault when I do
#mv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
tag 412562 + sarge
Bug#412562: nscd uninstallable on alpha and ia64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 411944 + patch
Bug#411944: CVE-2007-1006: format string overflows
Tags were: confirmed upstream fixed-upstream patch security
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tags 411944 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my ekiga 2.0.3-2.1 NMU.
Greetings
Martin
diff -u ekiga-2.0.3/debian/patches/00list ekiga-2.0.3/debian/patches/00list
--- ekiga-2.0.3/debian/patches/00list
+++ ekiga-2.0.3/debian/patches/00list
@@ -2,0 +3 @@
+20_CVE-2007-1006
diff -u
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#411944: fixed in ekiga 2.0.3-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
I already asked for a binNMU to fix this.
I am tagging this bug as pending.
Regards
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
tags 412527 pending
Bug#412527: python-scipy: depends on libc6 (= 2.5) but that version is not yet
availible in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message,
I gave this a shot. What am I looking for here?
I noticed if host is enabled, it add's it a 2nd time with the same value.
If host is commented out and uri enabled, it disabled uri and enables host.
So basically it's acting the same as before.
-Original Message-
From: Giuseppe Sacco
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:02:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390667: fixed in ircd-hybrid 1:7.2.2.dfsg.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: apg
Version: 2.2.3.dfsg.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
On amd64, here's the number of identical passwords generated when
generating 1000 passwords using apg:
$ (while true; do apg -a 1 -M l -n 1000 -x 8 -m 8 |sort |uniq -D |uniq |wc -l;
done) |uniq
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:32:45AM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il giorno lun, 26/02/2007 alle 00.54 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:44:37AM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il giorno lun, 26/02/2007 alle 01.31 -0500, Jamie ffolliott ha scritto:
I'm on i386. A
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:26:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[debian-release: This mail serves as both an NMU diff an an unblock request.
Please review and unblock.]
Unblocked.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27ubuntu8
severity 357561 grave
Bug#357561: use setsid() to detach from controlling tty
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Il giorno lun, 26/02/2007 alle 20.04 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:32:45AM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
[...]
Is the diff available somewhere for comment?
http://centrum.lixper.it/~giuseppe/libpam-ldap_183-0.0.diff.gz
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:19:30AM +0200, Sami Liedes wrote:
This bug does not seem to exist on i386 and appears to only affect
totally random (i.e. not pronounceable) password generation (-a 0).
There's also something wrong with -a 0. When generating a very large
number (3M) of passwords I get
Package: nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386
Severity: serious
Hi Randall,
The legacy modules packages also need updated for the 2.6.18-4 kernel ABI
change. These are the last two packages that need to be updated for the
change, and this is due to be the final ABI for etch, so I'm going to go
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:32:09 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#411969: fixed in texlive-lang 2005.dfsg.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
89 matches
Mail list logo
