Package: console-data
Version: 2:1.07-1
Followup-For: Bug #475924
Same bug here. 'apt-get install console-data' reports:
Setting up console-data (2:1.07-1) ...
no template type specified at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Template.pm line 34,
GEN0 chunk 10.
dpkg: error processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
severity 475924 serious
Bug#475924: console-data uninstallable when upgrading from 2:1.06-2 to 2:1.07-1
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
merge 475924 475923
Bug#475923:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
severity 475925 serious
Bug#475925: console-data: no template type specified
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
merge 475925 475923
Bug#475923: console-data: Upgrade failure:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:56:29 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Setting severity to grave, as this break the boot for Debian Edu
where munin-node is installed automatically.
Thanks for the report. We'll find a fix for this.
--
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen, Linpro
--
To
Quoting Michael Biebl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: console-data
Version: 2:1.07-1
Severity: serious
Justification: upgrade fails
The upgrade of console-data fails with the following error message:
OK, that apparently comes from missing Type: lines in debconf
templates.
That's weird as
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
These are the latest numbers:
I just ran this:
(cd /org/popcon.debian.org/popcon-mail/all-popcon-results;for f in \
popcon-2008-03-*.gz popcon-2008-04-*.gz; do echo -n $f: ; \
zcat $f | egrep 'Submi|Release: (1.44|1.41|1.42|1.43) '; done)
popcon-2008-03-01.gz:
Package: libfarsight0.1-3
Version: 0.1.27-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Using debian sid to call another debian sid, I was unable to connect
both machines using empathy voip until I removed the mentioned file.
I don't have the exact error at hand now (you
Hi,
I'm just guessing here, but wouldn't it be a solution if python-support
generated explicit dependencies on the pythonX.Y packages for packages
that don't support all versions, instead of using python = 2.4, python
= 2.5?
best,
Torsten
--
.: Torsten Marek
.:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 474880
Bug#474880: yaskkserv: FTBFS: !!! Fatal : G++ is too old. You need version 3.3
or newer.
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened,
[Stig Sandbeck Mathisen]
Thanks for the report. We'll find a fix for this.
Thank you. Please include a fix for #440003 too in the next upload, as
that bug made us in Debian Edu have to fork the package for Etch.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
retitle 458631 cacao: FTBFS: error: variable _Jv_JNIInvokeInterface has
initializer but incomplete type [fixed in experimental]
Bug#458631: cacao: FTBFS: error: variable
reopen 474880
found 474880 0.3.8-4
thanks
I'm sorry, but I can still reproduce this failure in this version :(
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-36
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I installed a base etch system (just base) and then upgraded to sid,
after this I was left with an unbootable system that stuck at Waiting
for root file system
This of course is evil.
The
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:05:14PM +0200,
Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 16 lines which said:
Apparently it's --no-ssh-cm.
Same problem, even after 'aptitude dist-upgrade' this morning.
% darcs pull --no-ssh-cm
%
(There *are* patches to pull.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: console-data
Version: 2:1.07-1
Severity: Grave
Followup-For: Bug #475923
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:45:44 +0300
Shourisha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see. So when will it be available?
It usually takes about one week to make package go through NEW queue.
It is also temporarily available in my repository -
http://debian.cihar.com/
--
Michal Čihař |
Package: vegastrike
Version: 0.5~svn12126-1
Severity: serious
vegastrike currently FTBS on several arches due to the fact they're
using gcc-4.3 for builds.
I'll investigate that as soon as I can (namely, tonight).
Cheers,
Vincent
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: mono-2.0-devel, siggen
Severity: serious
Justification: policy violation
hi,
both mono-2.0-devel and siggen ship
`/usr/bin/sgen'
but do neither conflict, nor add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the
same environment:
Unpacking siggen (from .../siggen_2.3.9-1_amd64.deb) ...
Francois Marier wrote:
I was just thinking about this bug and I was wondering whether there should
be a threshold under which any value is considered invalid.
For example, a value of 0% left on battery is likely to be invalid (as in
improperly reported) since it makes little sense.
So in the
reopen 474810
thanks
On 09/04/08 at 20:24 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
During another rebuild today, this package built fine, so it's likely
that the problem mentioned in this bug was caused by another package,
and fixed now.
I am now closing this bug. I will reopen if I can
Am Sonntag, den 13.04.2008, 20:03 +0200 schrieb Nico Golde:
Hi,
attached is a fix for this issue.
It will be also archived on:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/gnome-screensaver-2.22.0-1_2.22.0-1.1.patch
Please don't NMU this, otherwise you're delaying the libxklavier
transition even
Package: mono
Version: 1.9+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
0.9.18-7 / Mon Apr 14 02:42:18 +0200 2008
Automatic build of irda-utils_0.9.18-7 on bordereau-62.bordeaux.grid5000.fr
by sbuild/amd64 0.57.0
Build started at 20080414-0242
**
Failed to open ./irda-utils_0.9.18-7.dsc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
severity 473686 important
Bug#473686: mplayer fails to deal with XvMC properly after update
Severity set to `important' from `normal'
severity 475934 important
Bug#475934: FATAL:
Package: citadel-client, stress
Severity: serious
Justification: policy violation
hi,
both citadel-client and stress ship
`/usr/bin/stress'
but do neither conflict, nor add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the
same environment:
Unpacking stress (from .../stress_0.18.9-1_amd64.deb)
Package: liblua5.1-coxpcall0, xavante
Severity: serious
Justification: policy violation
hi,
both liblua5.1-coxpcall0 and xavante ship
`/usr/share/lua/5.1/coxpcall.lua'
but do neither conflict, nor add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the
same environment:
Unpacking xavante (from
Hi Sebastian,
* Sebastian Dröge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-14 11:04]:
Am Sonntag, den 13.04.2008, 20:03 +0200 schrieb Nico Golde:
Hi,
attached is a fix for this issue.
It will be also archived on:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/gnome-screensaver-2.22.0-1_2.22.0-1.1.patch
Package: xskat
Version: 4.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: tcltls
Version: 1.5.0.dfsg-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: webkit
Version: 0~svn27674-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: tulip
Version: 3.0.0~B6-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: libpuzzle
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: libmatthew-java
Version: 0.6-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: ocaml-portaudio
Version: 0.1.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: rcompgen
Version: 0.1-17-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: survex
Version: 1.0.39.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: libgd2
Version: 2.0.36~rc1~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: cwiid
Version: 0.6.00-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: gpsd
Version: 2.37-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: ocaml-ladspa
Version: 0.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: libpoe-api-peek-perl
Version: 1.0802-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: drqueue
Version: 0.60.0-1.2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:47:15 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#454879: fixed in qtstalker 0.32-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #454879,
regarding FTBFS with GCC 4.3: duplicate function parameters
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: tk8.3
Version: 8.3.5-12
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:47:17 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#474823: fixed in rafkill 1.2.2-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #474823,
regarding rafkill: FTBFS: build/drawer.cpp:127: error: 'strlen' was not
declared in this scope
to be marked as
Package: fslview
Version: 3.0+4.0.2-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:47:22 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#474804: fixed in zsnes 1.510-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #474804,
regarding zsnes: FTBFS: tools/strutil.h:34: error: 'strncasecmp' was not
declared in this scope
to be marked as
Package: cairodevice
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: yorick-hdf5
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: wxwindows2.4
Version: 2.4.5.1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
:1.4.9.1-5 / Mon Apr 14 01:26:01 +0200 2008
Automatic build of caudium_2:1.4.9.1-5 on bordereau-4.bordeaux.grid5000.fr by
sbuild/amd64 0.57.0
Build started at 20080414-0126
**
Failed to open ./caudium_1.4.9.1-5.dsc
Package: pdksh
Version: 5.2.14-21
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: ipband
Version: 0.7.2-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: filters
Version: 2.43
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: ipv6calc
Version: 0.71.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: swapspace
Version: 1.10-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: librpc-xml-perl
Version: 0.60-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 474810
Bug#474810: clisp: FTBFS: floatparam.h:18:2: error: #error Unknown rounding
mode for type double!
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Package: tcl8.3
Version: 8.3.5-10
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: rrdtool
Version: 1.2.27-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: edenmath.app
Version: 1.1.1a-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: wengophone
Version: 2.1.2.dfsg0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: tcl8.4
Version: 8.4.18-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: ocaml-mad
Version: 0.3.2-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
tags 475987 + pending
Bug#475987: openoffice.org: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat
`/usr/share/pycentral/java-gcj-compat-dev/site-packages/aotcompile.p y': No
such file or directory
There
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:17:29 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#476005: webkit: FTBFS: libQtWebKit.so: undefined
reference to `QFactoryLoader::QFactoryLoader(char const*, QStringList const,
QString const, Qt::CaseSensitivity)'
has caused the Debian
Package: libfactory++
Version: 0.1.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Am Montag, den 14.04.2008, 12:53 +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
Package: mono
Version: 1.9+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
Package: sketch
Version: 1:0.2.59-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: kino
Version: 1.2.0-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: ucspi-tcp
Version: 1:0.88-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: owl
Version: 2.1.8-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: ocaml-alsa
Version: 0.1.2-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:50:23PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: unison
Version: 2.13.16-9
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 476075 apt-get remove open* removes almost (or all) the packages
without asking permission!!
Bug#476075: apt-get -s remove open* removes almost (or all) the packages
without asking permission!!
Changed Bug title to `apt-get remove open*
tags 476071 + pending
thanks
Frank Gevaerts wrote:
live-magic wants to use gksu. However, it doesn't depend on it.
Thanks, now pending. :)
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG:
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:46:15 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#476054: libfactory++: FTBFS: dpkg-source:
unrepresentable changes to source
has caused the Debian Bug report #476054,
regarding libfactory++: FTBFS: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 476071 + pending
Bug#476071: live-magic: missing dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 476054 unreproducible
Bug#476054: libfactory++: FTBFS: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Package: rkward
Version: 0.4.9-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: rpy
Version: 1.0.1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: lmemory
Version: 0.6c-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:48:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is now
the default on most architectures (even if it's not the case on i386
Package: openjade1.3
Version: 1.3.2-9
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: capi4hylafax
Version: 1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-11
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of
Package: cdebconf-entropy
Version: 0.6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: gsmlib
Version: 1.10-12.4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: varmon
Version: 1.2.0-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: gzip
Version: 1.3.12-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: poker-engine
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because
Package: tcludp
Version: 1.0.8-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: libgtkimreg
Version: 0.1.3-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6
Version: 1.59
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2,
Package: tk8.4
Version: 8.4.18-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Package: epic4
Version: 1:2.6-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#474825: fixed in libspe2 2.2.80-95-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #474825,
regarding libspe2: FTBFS: cc1: error: unrecognized command line option
-mabi=altivec
to be marked as done.
Package: gcvs
Version: 1.0final-16
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: ocaml-ogg
Version: 0.1.1-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: wml
Version: 2.0.11ds1-0.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc
Package: tolua
Version: 5.1b-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080413 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
1 - 100 of 408 matches
Mail list logo
