Hi!
I believe that you have the same problem as I had. It is not a shotwell
problem but a gexiv2 problem. Look also here (639602) and here (622375)
CU
Michael
--
,''`.
: :' : Michael Ott
`. `'e-mail: michael at king-coder dot de
`-
signatur
Package: shotwell
Version: 0.11.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropiate ***
* What led up to the situation? Trying to start Shotwell
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 625330 patch
Bug #625330 [fileschanged] fileschanged: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
Added tag(s) patch.
> user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was cjwat...@ubuntu.com).
> usertags 625330 ubuntu-patch
tags 625330 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 625330 ubuntu-patch oneiric
thanks
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:32:46AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings
> which will make the package fail to build. Currently a Debian pa
Package: libparserutils
Version: 0.0.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #634409
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch
*** /tmp/tmpMRCwIg
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to fix the FTBFS.
Changelog :
* debian/patches:
- 01-remove-used-variable.patch:
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:18:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640750: fixed in libxbean-java 3.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #640750,
regarding libxbean-java: FTBFS: POM
'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin:2.8' not found in repository
to be marked as don
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:17:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#635687: fixed in ecore 1.0.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #635687,
regarding ecore: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Package: boinc-app-milkyway
Version: 0.18d-1
Followup-For: Bug #628256
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* bin/make.linux: Correct syntax that broke the build. Fixes FTBFS.
(LP
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 640610 emacs23
Bug #640610 [emacs-calfw] emacs-calfw: package removal fails
Bug #641363 [emacs-calfw] emacs-calfw: prevents emacs upgrade
Added indication that 640610 affects emacs23
Added indication that 641363 affects emacs23
> thanks
St
Package: libphone-ui
Version: 0.1+git20100517-1
Followup-For: Bug #625373
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch
*** /tmp/tmpXVdOAK
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to fix the FTBFS.
Those variables are only set but not used in their functions.
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:15:23 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#641489: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables
has caused the Debian Bug report #641489,
regarding adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Ahoj,
Dňa Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:55:07 +0200 Rene Engelhard
napísal:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:07:08PM +0200, Davide Prina wrote:
> > I have had the same error and I found that the installation process
> > stop with an error (sorry for the Italian message from my log):
>
> Ah.
>
> > -
Ahoj,
Dňa Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:04:04 +0200 Rene Engelhard
napísal:
> > This looks like #641357. Slavko, did you have that, too?
>
>
> Actually I meant #641005...
No, i was no errors while upgrade (installation) any of the libreoffice*
packages. Only a lot of GDK
Package: openr2
Version: 1.3.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #625393
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch
*** /tmp/tmp9QEj45
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to fix the FTBFS.
This variable can be removed because it's a copy/paste from other functions
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:55:07PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > -8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<--
> > Elaborazione dei trigger per libreoffice-common...
> >
> > ERROR:
> > com.sun.star.registry.SimpleRegistry.open(file:///usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:07:08PM +0200, Davide Prina wrote:
> I have had the same error and I found that the installation process
> stop with an error (sorry for the Italian message from my log):
Ah.
> -8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<--
> Elaborazione dei trigg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 641430 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=70942
Bug #641430 [libgetopt-euclid-perl] libgetopt-euclid-perl: 0.2.9 does not
recognise options in a =head2 inside =head1 OPTIONS
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://rt.cpan.or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 641430 + confirmed upstream
Bug #641430 [libgetopt-euclid-perl] libgetopt-euclid-perl: 0.2.9 does not
recognise options in a =head2 inside =head1 OPTIONS
Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
tag 641430 + confirmed upstream
thanks
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:27:01 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The cause seems to be a couple of =head2 headings inside the OPTIONS =head1:
>
> =head1 OPTIONS
>
> =head2 General behaviour
>
> You can customize the usage of mpd-dynamic with the fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 636396 1.8.3-1
Bug #636396 [mercurial] mercurial: Cloning fails with: mpatch.mpatchError:
patch cannot be decoded
Bug Marked as found in versions mercurial/1.8.3-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:00:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640966: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #640966,
regarding linux-headers-2.6.32-5-all: kernel oops with google-chrome-unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:00:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640966: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #640966,
regarding Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc//maps, regression in fix
for CVE-2011-1020
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:00:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640966: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #640966,
regarding Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc//maps, regression in fix
for CVE-2011-1020
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:00:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640966: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #640966,
regarding After installing linux-image-2.6.32-35squeeze1 popularity-contest
daily cronjob gets killed
to be marked as done
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:00:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640966: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-35squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #640966,
regarding Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc//maps, regression in fix
for CVE-2011-1020
to be marked as done.
This m
Package: adolc
Version: 2.1.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The source package contains the files vcredist_x86.exe and vcredist_x64.exe.
The following is an excerpt from eula.rtf contained in those CAB ar
On Tue 13 Sep 2011 12:19:35 CEST, Roland Mas wrote:
Hi,
I started having a look at the bug in the sid chroot of merulo (the ia64
porterbox). After a failed debuild, I re-ran the last command of the
debian/rules, and tried to separate the different tests to see which
were failing. My results:
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.4.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #641412
I have forgotten to say a thing: when the libreoffice crash (I don't
have see the error in the installation process) I have moved the
.libreoffice directory in .libreoffice_old and than I have do the
apt-get -f install.
Then I
On 2011-09-13 21:04 +0200, Daniel Bayer wrote:
> Now I updated to linux-libc-dev 3.0.0-3 to test. After this /usr/include/asm
> is an empty directory which belongs to gcc-multilib:
Congratulations, you have just rediscovered bug #638418.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:29:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:14:58PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 14:44 +0200, Daniel Bayer wrote:
> > > Package: linux-libc-dev
> > > Version: 3.0.0-3
> > > Severity: normal
> > > File: /usr/include/x86_6
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.4.3-1
I have had the same error and I found that the installation process stop
with an error (sorry for the Italian message from my log):
-8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<--
Elaborazione dei trigger per libreoffice-common...
ERROR:
Package: bup
Version: 0.24b-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
bup FTBFS on sparc:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bup&arch=sparc&ver=0.24b-1.1&stamp=1313905299
The failure is reproducible on smetana.d.o. From what I can tell, it
crashes in lib/bup/t/tbloom.py:test_bloom, line 18 (b.add_i
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:03:04 +0200 (CEST), Petr Salinger
wrote:
> just to make it clear.
> The tar works as expected, it just emits extra warning.
Maybe a patch to this test that would allow it to succeed in the
presence of the "extra warning" makes sense for now? I would accept
such a patch if
tag 641412 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 06:26:32PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> > > Note that this version survivied 12 days in sid without showing any sign
> > > of this problem.
> >
> > it may be some dependenci
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 620918 + patch
Bug #620918 [src:imms] imms: FTBFS for +b1: install: cannot stat
`build/libaudaciousimms.so': No such file or directory
Added tag(s) patch.
> user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (wa
tags 620918 + patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertag 620918 + origin-ubuntu oneiric
thanks
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:54:05AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Source: imms
> Version: 3.1.0~rc8-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> Hi,
>
> your package FTBFS for its +b1 binNMU
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 641413 + unreproducible
Bug #641413 [libreoffice] libreoffice: Crash on startup
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:21:39PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > $ /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin
> > X IO Error
>
> X Io error doesn't sound like a crash to me but like a "X IO Error".
>
> As X is mentioned: Which X driver do you use?
>
> > #10 0xf7dd1078 in XPending () from /
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 06:54:38PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> Dňa Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:26:32 +0200 Rene Engelhard
> napísal:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> > > > Note that this version survivied 12 days in sid without showing any
> > > > sign of this
Ahoj,
Dňa Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:26:32 +0200 Rene Engelhard
napísal:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> > > Note that this version survivied 12 days in sid without showing any
> > > sign of this problem.
> >
> > it may be some dependencies (versions), which are do
Package: alpine
Version: 2.00+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.3
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The file pico/msmem.c contains the following comment:
===
* This code originally written by Stephen Chung and posted to a Usene
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 641412 + unreproducible
Bug #641412 [libreoffice] [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641412: http://bugs.debian.o
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:48:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#638002: fixed in masqmail 0.2.30-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #638002,
regarding Improper seteuid() calls in src/log.c and src/masqmail.c
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> > Note that this version survivied 12 days in sid without showing any sign
> > of this problem.
>
> it may be some dependencies (versions), which are do not in testing yet
yes, maybe, but I would wonder about that becuase a) ttbomk Li
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 635488 + patch
Bug #635488 [src:ploticus] ploticus: FTBFS Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev,
not libjpeg62-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 635488 + pending
Bug #635488 [src:ploticus] ploticus: FTBFS Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev,
not
tags 635488 + patch
tags 635488 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ploticus (versioned as 2.41-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649
Ahoj,
Dňa Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:17:43 +0200 Rene Engelhard
napísal:
> tag 641412 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> > After upgrading to mentioned version, the libreoffice can't start and
> > only display splash for small time.
>
> And using the sam
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Chris, will you take care of the uploads or do you need help?
Should manage to do it this evening.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:45 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> My fault.
>
> There is a GSoC project are working.
> I will try to fix it when this GSoC project is finished.
>
python2.7 ./waf build should work.
I will support it when 3.13, and python3 may be included.
Sorry for this version. I am quite bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 641413 + moreinfo
Bug #641413 [libreoffice] libreoffice: Crash on startup
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641413
tag 641413 + moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:39:28AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> on my current sid system, libreoffice crashes on startup. IMO, it's not the
> same issue as the other reported crashes, therefore reporting separately:
And why did you not report this 12 days ago when th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 641412 + moreinfo
Bug #641412 [libreoffice] [libreoffice] segfault from libsofficeapp.so on start
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641412: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
tag 641412 + moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> After upgrading to mentioned version, the libreoffice can't start and only
> display splash for
> small time.
And using the same version in sid? Sorry, but there's not enough resources
to support this in testi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 641378 + patch
Bug #641378 [sat4j] sat4j: FTBFS: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: not
found
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
tag 641378 + patch
thanks
The attached patch solves this issue.
BTW, the default-jdk on s390 recently switched to openjdk-6-jdk, so
I'm not sure if the conditional setting of JAVA_HOME is still needed.
--
Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc
secure email with PGP 0x7D8967E9 available at http://k
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 641380 + pending
Bug #641380 {Done: Miguel Landaeta } [surefire] surefire:
FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641380: h
tag 641380 + pending
thanks
This is fixed in svn.
--
Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc
secure email with PGP 0x7D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/
"Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: backuppc
Severity: serious
Tags: security patch
Hi,
BackupPC 3.2.1 was released back in April.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=f1f1ef74-716d-4af8-b1bf-c1ba6d9a98a1%40SC1EXHC-02.global.atheros.com&forum_name=backuppc-devel
The release includes a security fix. Can
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:48:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#639059: fixed in z88 13.0.0+dfsg2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #639059,
regarding z88: FTBFS: /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdktypes.h:55:23: fatal error:
gdkconfig.h: No such file or directory
to be marked a
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:32:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#635122: fixed in gedit-valencia-plugin 0.3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #635122,
regarding gedit-valencia-plugin: Please update for gedit 3.0 plugin path changes
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 641052 + security
Bug #641052 [src:evolution-data-server3] evolution uses insecure connection
when storing the sent message to the sent folder
Added tag(s) security.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:07:15PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> Package: myspell-da
> Version: 1.6.25-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package still uses an entry in maintainer scripts that calls the
> soon to disappear update-openoffice-dicts script in a way that will
> fail once it is
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#620246: fixed in dsdo 1.6.25-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #620246,
regarding idanish: Conflicts with newest ispell
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Several security issues were announced in Django:
> https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/09/security-releases-issued/
> and a regression fix was later posted:
> https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/10/127/
>
> Can you please ensu
On ven., 2011-09-09 at 23:53 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> reassign 641052 src:evolution-data-server3
> forwarded 641052 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648277
> clone 641052 -1
> reassign -1 evolution-data-server
> thanks
>
> On ven., 2011-09-09 at 23:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wr
On Mar 13 Sep 2011 04:06:12 Mathieu Malaterre escribió:
[snip]
> Just FYI. *.cmake files have been moved to paraview-dev, if you take
> the latest from git.
> What is left to do is:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/paraview.git;a=
> blob;f=debian/TODO;h=9c6efbc305b8
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:51:21 +0100
with message-id <1315918287.31127.19.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: moving files to arch specific include breaks compilations
with -m32
has caused the Debian Bug report #640672,
regarding moving files to arch specific include breaks compilati
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 641419 + moreinfo patch
Bug #641419 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: sendfile(2) behaves
incorrectly in 2.6.32-5-amd64, overwriting written data
Added tag(s) moreinfo and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # data loss
> severity 641419 grave
Bug #641419 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: sendfile(2) behaves
incorrectly in 2.6.32-5-amd64, overwriting written data
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 07:44:26AM +0100, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> * Thus spake Christoph Schmidt-Hieber (c.schmidt-hie...@ucl.ac.uk):
> > On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> > >It seems to build now but I have no clue if
> > >it works. A testsuite could show that :)
> >
> > $ make ch
Version 0.10.18-1
I think we can close it this way ;-)
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Christoph Schmidt-Hieber wrote:
> 0.10.18-1 seems to build fine on powerpc; see e.g.
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stimfit/0.10.18-1/+build/2781444
> Can we consider this bug as fixed? If so, how do I mark it?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 641430 libaudio-mpd-perl
Bug #641430 [libgetopt-euclid-perl] libgetopt-euclid-perl: 0.2.9 does not
recognise options in a =head2 inside =head1 OPTIONS
Added indication that 641430 affects libaudio-mpd-perl
> thanks
Stopping processing her
Package: libgetopt-euclid-perl
Version: 0.2.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: unpredictable effects on previously-working software
mpd-dynamic, a script provided by libaudio-mpd-perl, uses Getopt::Euclid for
command-line options. G::E 0.2.7 recognises that it has command-line options,
but G::E 0.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 625068 patch
Bug #625068 [src:liborigin] liborigin: FTBFS: tree.hh:138:21: error:
'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type
Added tag(s) patch.
> user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was cjwat...@ubuntu.co
tags 625068 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 625068 ubuntu-patch oneiric
thanks
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:33:55PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part:
> > g++ -c -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -fP
Hi,
I started having a look at the bug in the sid chroot of merulo (the ia64
porterbox). After a failed debuild, I re-ran the last command of the
debian/rules, and tried to separate the different tests to see which
were failing. My results:
(sid)lolando@merulo:~/subvertpy-0.8.5/build/lib.linux-
Package: java-wrappers
Version: 0.1.23
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
<-- snip -->
$ azureus
[warning] /usr/bin/azureus: No java runtime was found
[warning] /usr/bin/azureus: No JAVA_CMD set for run_java, falling back to
JAVA_CMD = java
<-- snip -->
openjdk-7-jre is the only JRE I hav
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 640610 + confirmed
Bug #640610 [emacs-calfw] emacs-calfw: package removal fails
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> severity 641363 serious
Bug #641363 [emacs-calfw] emacs-calfw: prevents emacs upgrade
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> merg
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:32:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556713: fixed in xmms2-scrobbler 0.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #556713,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 634538 + patch
Bug #634538 [src:tcpreplay] tcpreplay: FTBFS: configure: error: Unable to find
matching library for header file in /usr
Added tag(s) patch.
> user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was
tag 634538 + patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 634538 oneiric ubuntu-patch
user debian-d...@lists.debian.org
usertags 634538 multiarch
thanks
patch at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/79765815/tcpreplay_3.4.3-2_3.4.3-2ubuntu1.diff.gz
but I assume this hard coding will break again wit
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
on my current sid system, libreoffice crashes on startup. IMO, it's not the
same issue as the other reported crashes, therefore reporting separately:
$ /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin
X IO Error
$
(Run under screen now to ge
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.4.3-1
Severity: grave
After upgrading to mentioned version, the libreoffice can't start and only
display splash for
small time.
The syslog contains:
Sep 13 11:18:18 bonifac kernel: [ 4125.783594] soffice.bin[11497]: segfault at
0 ip 7f8fbf7ab292 sp 7ff
Josip Rodin writes ("Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile"):
> Since my reasoning here didn't seem to leave a particular positive dent with
> those tech-ctte members who have responded so far, I would just like to
> solicit Ian Jackson's input, given his role in defining and implementi
Package: python-django
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
Several security issues were announced in Django:
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/09/security-releases-issued/
and a regression fix was later posted:
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/10/127/
Can you please ens
Hi,
Thank you for reporting, and sorry for reply late, I just returned
from annual leave.
This bug was introduced during fixing the lintian error
"temporary-debhelper-file" of cernlib, it also occurs, though not
FTBFS, in the packages mclibs and geant321. I would upload a new
version of these pac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 629067 + squeeze
Bug #629067 [libactionpack-ruby] libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update
breaks redmine
Added tag(s) squeeze.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
629067: http://bugs.debian.org/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 634990 rails/2.3.14
Bug #634990 {Done: OndÅej Surý } [rails] CVE-2011-2197
Bug No longer marked as found in versions rails/2.3.14.
> notfixed 634990 2.3.14
Bug #634990 {Done: OndÅej Surý } [rails] CVE-2011-2197
Bug No longer marked as
2011/9/12 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer :
> On Dom 11 Sep 2011 06:00:39 Mathieu Malaterre escribió:
> [snip]
>> > Now ParaViewConfig.cmake should be installed by paraview-dev. To help the
>> > transition, all the packages that currently build-depend on paraview
>> > should be filled a normal
89 matches
Mail list logo
