[Adam D. Barratt, 2011-12-19]
I noticed that an upload which appears to fix this issue (although
without reference the bug number) has appeared in p-u-NEW. Whilst
sorry, I didn't notice a bug was reported
that's an admirable turn-around :-) it really should have been discussed
with the SRMs
Hi Charles,
I tried to help on #627861 but when I tried git-buildpackage I've got:
...
dh_clean
gbp:error: You have uncommitted changes in your source tree:
gbp:error: # On branch master
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 1 commit.
#
# Changes not staged for commit:
# (use git
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:46:46 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Kloeckner inf...@tiker.net wrote:
Did, and it helped. Thanks very much!
Good!
This being as it is, could you upload a new package with tightened
dependencies?
The dependency on
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:31:15 +
with message-id e1rcw2v-0002z3...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#633101: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #552228,
regarding archfs: spins CPU and consumes too much memory for large backups
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 649522 by 652716
Bug #649522 [liblzma-dev] liblzma-dev: undeclared Breaks against binutils-gold
(linker prefers unversioned symbol, causes rbuilddeps to FTBFS)
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 649522: 652716
End of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 593023 serious
Bug #593023 [src:libnice] libnice sometimes FTFBS (test failures) under heavy
load
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
block 639871 by 593023
Bug #639871 [release.debian.org] transition: gssdp/gupnp
Was not
reopen 652427
thanks
On 20.12.2011 03:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the src:colord package:
#652427: Missing kfreebsd-* packages
Apparently I missed an important bit:
libsane-dev did pull
Hi,
you introduced a dependency to the iproute package!
openvpn 2.2.0-2 WHITOUT iproute:
do_ifconfig, tt-ipv6=0, tt-did_ifconfig_ipv6_setup=0
/sbin/ifconfig tun2 10.1.2.6 pointopoint 10.1.2.5 mtu 1500
openvpn 2.2.1-2 WHITOUT iproute:
do_ifconfig, tt-ipv6=0, tt-did_ifconfig_ipv6_setup=0
/bin/ip
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# This also affects sid and Wheezy
tags 593023 - squeeze experimental
Bug #593023 [src:libnice] libnice sometimes FTFBS (test failures) under heavy
load
Removed tag(s) squeeze and experimental.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 652427
Bug #652427 {Done: Christopher James Halse Rogers r...@ubuntu.com}
[src:colord] Missing kfreebsd-* packages
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed
Source: lighttpd
Version: 1.4.29-1, 1.4.28-2, 1.4.19-5+lenny2
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer,
Security bug has been discovered in lighttpd:
DoS because of incorrect code in src/http_auth.c:67
This is
Package: mozplugger
Version: 1.14.3-6
Followup-For: Bug #609215
I can confirm this bug. Like all other reporters I am running awesome
(3.4.11-1), but unlike others I can reproduce it with iceweasel
(8.0.-3+b1). Also when I kill the pdf viewer (xpdf 3.02-21) from a linux
vt, the grabbing of input
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 652726 pending
Bug #652726 [src:lighttpd] CVE-2011-4362: DoS because of incorrect code in
src/http_auth.c:67
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
652726:
Package: kaddressbook
Version: 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-1
I can confirm. Please improve the robusness and add regular backup.
This is crap.
Bastien
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
900 testing security.debian.org
[Adding Kumar (maintainer of Armadillo) in Cc]
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Julien Cristau
julien.cris...@logilab.fr wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:46:46 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Kloeckner inf...@tiker.net wrote:
This being as it is, could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mahyuddin,
On 20.12.2011 11:10, Mahyuddin Susanto wrote:
Security bug has been discovered in lighttpd:
DoS because of incorrect code in src/http_auth.c:67
we already prepared an updated version and backported the fixes to
Stable and Oldstable.
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:36:58 +0100
with message-id 4ef0654a.4020...@debian.org
and subject line evolution-data-server: FTBFS: configure: error: libgdata 0.7
is not supported, use 0.6 instead
has caused the Debian Bug report #639174,
regarding evolution-data-server: FTBFS:
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:43:19 +0100
with message-id 4ef066c7.7090...@debian.org
and subject line evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent
message to the sent folder
has caused the Debian Bug report #641054,
regarding evolution uses insecure connection when storing
tag 651821 +pending
thanks
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 05:15:09AM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
Dear maintainer,
Please find attached a diff for a NMU proposal (as git format-patch
output) removing those snippets. If I do not hear from you I plan to
upload it somewhere next week.
myspell-el-gr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 651821 +pending
Bug #651821 [myspell-el-gr] myspell-el-gr: Please, do not call
update-openoffice-dicts from maintainer scripts.
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
651821:
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:33:07 +
with message-id e1rcysv-kx...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#652702: fixed in openvpn 2.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #652702,
regarding openvpn: fails to start after upgrade: Linux ip link set failed:
could not execute
Hi Robert!
* Robert Millan r...@debian.org [111207 14:46]:
Due to dependency on udev (see attached patch)
I just checked, and while that makes the package installable, it sadly
doesn't make it usable. On my kfreebsd test machine I get after
applying your patch:
debian:~# ntfs-config
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:58:46AM +0100, Dr. Markus Waldeck wrote:
Hi,
you introduced a dependency to the iproute package!
openvpn 2.2.0-2 WHITOUT iproute:
do_ifconfig, tt-ipv6=0, tt-did_ifconfig_ipv6_setup=0
/sbin/ifconfig tun2 10.1.2.6 pointopoint 10.1.2.5 mtu 1500
openvpn 2.2.1-2
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:17:56 +
with message-id e1rczzs-0004bz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#554408: fixed in fuse-umfuse-iso9660 0.2b-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #554408,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Source: checkpolicy
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
cc -s checkpolicy.o
Source: hyphenation-pa
Version: 0.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: libmodule-install-xsutil-perl
Version: 0.42-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: s3ql
Version: 1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: ruby-ole
Version: 1.2.11.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: libxml-java
Version: 1.1.6.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: libffi-ruby
Version: 0.6.3debian-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: sslsniff
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME
Source: bzr-grep
Version: 0.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: policycoreutils
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
cc -s
Source: frei0r
Version: 1.1.22git20091109-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash
Source: libextutils-xspp-perl
Version: 0.1602-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libpam-mount
Version: 2.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool
Source: hyphenation-bn
Version: 0.6.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: gmic
Version: 1.5.0.7+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc: fatal error
Source: ruby-fast-gettext
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian
Source: wesnoth-1.8
Version: 1:1.8.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
x86_64-linux
Source: ruby-ruby2ruby
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian
Source: anytun
Version: 0.3.3-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -g -Wall -O2
Source: spring
Version: 0.82.7.1+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: gnome-mousetrap
Version: 0.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: cimg
Version: 1.4.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -o CImg_demo CImg_demo.cpp
Source: samizdat
Version: 0.6.2.20110927-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian
Source: ruby-parsetree
Version: 3.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian
Source: jodconverter
Version: 2.2.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: libmodule-build-perl
Version: 0.38-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: fgrun
Version: 1.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I
Source: libpoe-api-peek-perl
Version: 2.1900-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: kamoso
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: multipartposthandler
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot
Source: xdg-utils
Version: 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2
Source: liblayout
Version: 0.2.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: sushi
Version: 1.3.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine
Version: 0.9.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: bokken
Version: 1.5-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: pinot
Version: 0.96-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag
Source: gringo
Version: 3.0.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[6]: Entering directory
Source: typogrify
Version: 20111209-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: simgear
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I
Source: openvrml
Version: 0.18.8-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool
Source: bzr-hg
Version: 0.2.0~bzr531-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: ruby-spreadsheet
Version: 0.6.5.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian
Source: gfarm2fs
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ruby-rspec-mocks
Version: 2.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian
Source: ovito
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering directory
Source: flightgear
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I
Source: python-visual
Version: 1:5.12-1.3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash
Source: sary-ruby
Version: 1.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: libfonts-java
Version: 1.1.6.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: qucs
Version: 0.0.16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: ruby-image-science
Version: 1.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian
Source: simplyhtml
Version: 0.13.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: plexus-containers1.5
Version: 1.5.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules
Source: uimaj
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:24:45 +
with message-id e1rd1yb-00023l...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#617659: fixed in pdnsd 1.2.8-par-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #617659,
regarding pdnsd: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: helpers.c:502: undefined reference to
`arc4random'
to be
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:24:45 +
with message-id e1rd1yb-00023r...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#630209: fixed in pdnsd 1.2.8-par-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #630209,
regarding pdnsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `pthread_sigmask'
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:24:45 +
with message-id e1rd1yb-00023r...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#630209: fixed in pdnsd 1.2.8-par-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #630209,
regarding pdnsd: FTBFS(kfreebsd): undefined reference to pthread_*
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:24:08 +
with message-id e1rd1y0-00020r...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#646479: fixed in mined 2011.19.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #646479,
regarding mined: FTBFS: io.c:2554: undefined reference to `tgetflag'
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:24:45 +
with message-id e1rd1yb-00023w...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#651112: fixed in pdnsd 1.2.8-par-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #651112,
regarding pdnsd: FTBFS(kfreebsd): undefined reference to pthread_*
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:24:45 +
with message-id e1rd1yb-00023w...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#651112: fixed in pdnsd 1.2.8-par-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #651112,
regarding pdnsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `pthread_sigmask'
to be marked as done.
This
Source: libwx-scintilla-perl
Version: 0.34-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Builds of libwx-scintilla-perl against current (multiarch-enabled)
wxWidgets development packages are failing, due to looking for the
configuration-dependent wx/setup.h header in its
Package: broadcom-sta-modules-3.1.0-1-amd64
Version: 5.100.82.112-3+3.1.1-1
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
I have an Acer One 722 Series, this one comes with the broadcom 4313 wlan
device that should work whit either the brcm80211 driver
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:29:38 +
with message-id e1rd1dk-0002a4...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#642673: fixed in vdr-plugin-dvd
0.3.6~b03+cvs20090426.0013-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #642673,
regarding vdr-plugin-dvd: FTBFS: dvdnav.h:284:47: error: expected ','
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 652778 libboost1.48-dev
Bug #652778 [src:kamoso] kamoso: FTBFS: has_binary_operator.hp:50: Parse error
at BOOST_JOIN
Bug reassigned from package 'src:kamoso' to 'libboost1.48-dev'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
tags 555880 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for overgod (versioned as 1.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06
: :' : Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 555880 + pending
Bug #555880 [src:overgod] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
555880: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555880
Debian
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh clean --with python2
: multipartposthandler
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh
...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: libextutils-xspp-perl
Version: 0.1602-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# same here. new POE version?
tags 652777 + confirmed
Bug #652777 [src:libpoe-api-peek-perl] libpoe-api-peek-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Added tag(s) confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: libmodule-install-xsutil-perl
Version: 0.42-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid
: 0.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/bzr-grep-6P4N4z/bzr
Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: libmodule-build-perl
Version: 0.38-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages
: hyphenation-bn
Version: 0.6.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build
: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/bzr-hg-3DNA9H/bzr-hg-0.2.0~bzr531'
BZR_CONCURRENCY=10
I am CCing upstream here.
Dear Conrad,
Was an shlib bump warranted, based on your view of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651997 ?
Thanks.
Kumar
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:35:53AM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
[Adding Kumar (maintainer of Armadillo) in Cc]
On Tue, Dec 20,
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo