Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 653125 normal
Bug #653125 [debian-i18n] Farsi characters problem
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
653125: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
severity 653125 normal
thanks
Quoting Sasan Rose (sasan.r...@gmail.com):
> Package: debian-i18n
> Severity: grave
> Tags: l10n
> Justification: renders package unusable
In this case, no "package" is even mentioned, so no reason to use an
RC severity.
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> Farsi layout is worki
Package: ghc-mod
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu precise ubuntu-patch
*** /tmp/tmpZB0472/bug_body
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 19:51 +0300, Alexander Galanin wrote:
> File /usr/lib/tcltk/sqlite3/pkgIndex.tcl is empty, so package sqlite3
> can not be loaded in Tcl programs.
Indeed. On all platforms, it doesn't contain the "package ifneeded ..."
line. A simple rebuild fixes this issue.
I've asked the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 644297 - unreproducible
Bug #644297 [pysieved] pysieved: uninstallable: Depends: python (< 2.7) but
2.7.2-7 is to be installed
Removed tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
64
tag 644297 - unreproducible
thanks
I was to quick. Actually the downloaded package is *not* installable as
reported initially, but recompiling it hopefully does the trick.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Here's a patch that fixes the problem, but I think further discussion on how
to handle this in a way that is safe/correct is needed. Since there's no
*requirement* that the "key file" used with a keyscript is an actual file,
it's hard to know for sure whether the intent is to use a file or just gi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 644297 + unreproducible
Bug #644297 [pysieved] pysieved: uninstallable: Depends: python (< 2.7) but
2.7.2-7 is to be installed
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6442
tag 644297 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
I built the package tonight with pbuilder and could install it with
pbuilder --login.
Cheers,
Martin
$ uname -a
Linux malioth 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 3 03:41:26 UTC 2011 x86_64
GNU/Linux
$ dpkg --info pysieved_1.1-0.1_all.deb
new debian pac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 639871 with 653131
Bug #639871 [release.debian.org] transition: gssdp/gupnp
Was blocked by: 652783 593023
Added blocking bug(s) of 639871: 653131
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
639871: http:
Hi Alan,
> > We are aware of 2 non-trivial issues in 2.6.39
> That seems to match what I've seen too, as these issues are the only
> big things I've encountered so far and I have a building, semi-working
> module.
>
> I had some trouble with it reporting unmatched System.map between
> running ker
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.1.3-4squeeze2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
When update-initramfs is run, an initrd is built including my keyscript, but
*not* my key file. This rendered the system unbootable without warning. I
was able to recover from a rescue cd by
Package: src:linux-2.6
Version: 3.2~rc4-1~experimental.1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Hi,
My system has run Debian 2.6.32 kernels for 21 months, with two RAID-1s
spanning a pair of Intel X-25M 80GiB SSDs; one RAID (sd[ab]1) is for a
/boot filesystem, and another (sd
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:04:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#649703: fixed in fpc 2.4.4-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #649703,
regarding Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 652164 + patch
Bug #652164 [src:rakarrack] rakarrack: FTBFS: ../../src/rakarrack.cxx:22892:37:
error: format not a string literal and no format arguments
[-Werror=format-security]
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Package: rakarrack
Version: 0.6.1-3
Followup-For: Bug #652164
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu precise ubuntu-patch
In Ubuntu Precise, the following patch was applied to resolve the FTBFS.
Thanks for considering the patch.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/
Any news?
--
Alexander Galanin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 04:56:55PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Source: oprofile
> Severity: serious
>
> oprofile seems like a candidate for removal:
>
> - Last maintainer upload in 2009
> - No followup to security or RC bugs from the maintainers
> - Low popcon
> - Alternatives exist (perf)
Hi Ed,
Ed Abbott wrote:
> I need to take some more time in the next few days and
> try again. I'm not sure that the alsa software and the
> firmware are properly matched in terms of version number.
Honestly I don't suspect that is needed. What would be useful is
- for someone to summarize th
The fsck found nothing
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
You can close it. Will fsck the NAS. will take quite some time.
--eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: coreutils
Version: 8.13-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
/bin/cat whatever just segfaults breaking several init scripts (like
hostname.sh)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experime
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:29:42 +
with message-id <20111224172942.ga15...@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#652888: bad dependencies in xulrunner-9.0 cause failed
https
has caused the Debian Bug report #652888,
regarding iceweasel: https support broken
to be mar
On Friday 23 December 2011 21:05:05 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 614610 - moreinfo
> quit
>
> Hi again,
>
> Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Ed Abbott [111211 13:12 -0500]:
> >> The Alsa Project has a package called alsa-firmware. This
> >> package made the error message that appeared on bootup
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:40:20 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: util-vserver
> Severity: serious
>
> util-vserver hasn't seen an upload since 1.5 years and vserver support
> has been dropped from the Debian kernels post-Squeeze.
>
> Should util-vserver be removed as well?
I'm not sure.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 639400 serious
Bug #639400 [src:network-manager-strongswan] Please update for network-manager
0.9
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
639400: http:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:58:46 +0100 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2011-11-09 13:39:24 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> > which was filed against the python-gobject package:
> >
> > #640467: gnome-tweak-tool no start
> >
> > I
Source: oprofile
Severity: serious
oprofile seems like a candidate for removal:
- Last maintainer upload in 2009
- No followup to security or RC bugs from the maintainers
- Low popcon
- Alternatives exist (perf)
- Depends on legacy libs (604366)
- Broken wih current kernels (615964)
Unless there
Hi,
The attached patch fixes the "Resource Not Found" errors for me, which
makes gracie usable.
--
Matt Kraai
https://ftbfs.org/kraai
diff -ru gracie-0.2.11~/gracie/httprequest.py gracie-0.2.11/gracie/httprequest.py
--- gracie-0.2.11~/gracie/httprequest.py 2011-12-24 06:57:53.0 -0800
+++
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 640319 + pending
Bug #640319 [src:jed] jed: FTBFS: gcc-4.6.real: error: unrecognized option '-V'
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
640319: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
tags 640319 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for jed (versioned as 1:0.99.19-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06
: :' : Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 652769 -1
Bug#652769: gnome-mousetrap: FTBFS: configure: error: Could not find python
module opencv
Bug 652769 cloned as bug 653157.
> reassign -1 python-opencv 2.3.1-1
Bug #653157 [src:gnome-mousetrap] gnome-mousetrap: FTBFS: configure: e
clone 652769 -1
reassign -1 python-opencv 2.3.1-1
retitle -1 python-opencv does not provide LoadHaarClassifierCascade any more
block 652769 with -1
kthxbye
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 21:34:34 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> clone 652769
> reassign 652769 python-opencv 2.3.1-1
> retitle 652769 python
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 642639 with 642640
Bug #642639 [src:libalog] libalog: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
gnat, libaws2.7-dev
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 642639: 642640
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:47:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#652842: fixed in gnome-do-plugins 0.8.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #652842,
regarding Depends on obsolete libgdata1.8-cil
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:47:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#639590: fixed in binutils-z80 2.22-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #639590,
regarding binutils-z80: unbuildable in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Package: xul-ext-all-in-one-sidebar
Version: 0.7.14-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Since iceweasel 9.0.1-1 is now in unstable it's not possible to install
xul-ext-add-in-one-sidebar in unstable anymore:
# apt-get install
Hi,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote (22 Dec 2011 21:36:59 GMT) :
> #653003: xul-ext-requestpolicy: Need update for Iceweasel/Firefox 9
> It has been closed by Fabrizio Regalli .
Thank you for taking care of this.
> +-9.0a1
> ++*
I'm a bit surprised this bug was fixed by optimis
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 650050 0.2.90~2011-2
Bug #650050 {Done: Josselin Mouette } [src:evolution-rss]
FTBFS: e-shell-taskbar.h:62:2: error: unknown type name 'GtkHBox'
The source evolution-rss and version do not appear to match any binary packages
Bug Marked
Hi,
Fabrizio Regalli wrote (23 Dec 2011 11:04:55 GMT) :
> Right but in any case, if you want to purge or remove the package,
> directory /lib/firmware/b43 needs to be removed regardless of the
> firmware installed.
I seems to me the implicit logics behind both your reply and the
current behaviour
Package: amsn
Version: 0.98.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
We were recompiling amsn as a part of the gssdp/gupnp transition and
it failed to build on several architectures.
The last part of the amd64 log on the buildd[1]:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:52:33 +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
> The only way to work around this is to use gcc-4.4 on armel. Is this an
> acceptable work-around, i.e. how long will gcc 4.4 be in unstable?
>
Yes please, it looks like using 4.4 is the way to go for now.
Thanks,
Julien
--
To UNS
Source: sflphone
Version: 1.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
sflphone fails to build on the s390 build daemons:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sflphone&arch=s390&ver=1.0.1-4&stamp=1322213694
> libtool: compile:
Package: debian-i18n
Severity: grave
Tags: l10n
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Farsi layout is working system wide without any problem, but using
terminal or vim or gvim, farsi characters are just bunch of question marks.
I tried to change terminal profile's font but no
44 matches
Mail list logo
