Package: qutecom
Version: 2.2.1+dfsg1-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Qutecom crashed as soon as a video call was initiated. Webcam support works
(the test picture is shown).
When I call 5...@ekiga.net (or a real contact), qutecom crashes with the
fol
Your message dated Sun, 28 Oct 2012 06:47:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688798: fixed in ruby-tmail 1.2.7.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #688798,
regarding tmailscanner.c references functions which are removed in ruby1.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Package: puredata
Followup-For: Bug #690410
Recompiled puredata with the following 2 lines added to the top of
debian/rules:
# Stop problems with puredata crashing due to buffer space issues?
export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=+format,-fortify,+stackprotector,+relro
This turns off _FORTIF
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> So how can we get the bugfix into wheezy (if you deem it important
> enough to be fixed at this stage of the freeze – do you)?
Yes, for a better release.
Thanks,
--
YOSHINO Yoshihito
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:58:00 -0400
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> >> I can reproduce this with sbuild on sid-amd64. Did you guys all use
> >> sbuild for testing?
> >
> > Nope, cowbuilder.
>
> pbuilder here.
pbuilder, too.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://w
Your message dated Sun, 28 Oct 2012 02:50:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#690124: fixed in mahara 1.5.1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690124,
regarding mahara: directory vs. symlink messup after squeeze->wheezy upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 690124 + patch
Bug #690124 [mahara] mahara: directory vs. symlink messup after squeeze->wheezy
upgrade
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
690124: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
tags 690124 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for mahara (versioned as 1.5.1-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
David
diff -Nru mahara-1.5.1/debian/changelog mahara-1.5.1/debian/changelog
--- mahara-1.5.1/debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #mahara (1.5.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * debian/mahara.preinst: Remove previous symlink that is replaced by a
> #directory (closes: #690124)
> #
> limit source mahara
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 691642 normal
Bug #691642 [xterm] xterm: outputting the mc5 sequence (prtr_on / turn on
printer) makes xterm crash
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
691642
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 23:47:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#691376: fixed in schroot 1.6.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #691376,
regarding schroot: session recovery mounts $device, not $mount-device, for LVM
snapshots
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 23:47:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#686148: fixed in schroot 1.6.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686148,
regarding schroot: Does not unmount /run/shm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Antoine,
Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I started getting this error when using emacs after the latest wheezy
> upgrade:
>
> Warning: Lisp directory `/etc/emacs23' does not exist.
>
> I mark this grave as it makes most emacs parts unusable... My .emacs is
> not loaded, f
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:21:39AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-10-27 18:34:11 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > The documentation is correct; there is an error in your report.
> > The rules for X resource syntax are different from your expectation.
> > This is an empty string:
> >
> > *p
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689522 [emacs23] Lisp directory `/etc/emacs23' does not exist
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689522: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689522
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On 2012-10-27 18:34:11 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> The documentation is correct; there is an error in your report.
> The rules for X resource syntax are different from your expectation.
> This is an empty string:
>
> *printerCommand:
>
> This is the two double-quote characters (literally):
>
>
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 23:03:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#691619: fixed in unburden-home-dir 0.3.1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #691619,
regarding unburden-home-dir: Option for a "dry run" is ignored under some
circumstances
to be marked as done.
This means th
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:07:04AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 278-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
...
> I have the following X resource:
>
> *printerCommand: ""
>
> The xterm(1) man page says:
>
> printerComma
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:18:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#689191: fixed in libxml2 2.9.0+dfsg1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #689191,
regarding python-libxml2 (v. 2.9.0) undefined symbol
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Package: xterm
Version: 278-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
When cat'ing some binary file, my xterm crashed. I've managed to find
the cause: the mc5 terminfo sequence (prtr_on / turn on printer). The
problem can be reproduced with:
1. Run xterm from an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # typos in subject
> retitle 666334 FTBFS: build-arch problems with patch applying and
> installation of files generated only in build-indep target
Bug #666334 [src:gnustep-back] FTBFS: build-arch problems with patch applying
and instalation of
Hello Jean-Michel,
today I wanted to take a stab to get a package fixing #690142 into
wheezy and came across your attempt on mentors
http://mentors.debian.net/package/bind9
which looks good from my POV, but it's hard to tell since the original
packaging is a bit messy.
Since I haven't s
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 17:48 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:25:50 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>
> > I've uploaded Laszlo's NMU for python-greenlet (versioned as
> > 0.3.1-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me
> > if I should delay it longer.
>
> T
Package: multiarch-support
Followup-For: Bug #691605
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Michael,
thanks for confirmation that this is already fixed in the source.
However it seems that the archives still think that the priority is standard,
so maybe the ftpmasters still need to
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:29:07 -0700
with message-id <20121027202907.GA31184@elie.Belkin>
and subject line Re: Version: pseudo-header seems to be working again
has caused the Debian Bug report #685266,
regarding bugs.debian.org: Missing "Found in" in bug submission, though
"Version:"
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:29:07 -0700
with message-id <20121027202907.GA31184@elie.Belkin>
and subject line Re: Version: pseudo-header seems to be working again
has caused the Debian Bug report #685266,
regarding bugs.debian.org: submit@ ignores Version: pseudoheader
to be marked as do
Control: retitle -1 Long description is wrong
Control: severity -1 normal
The phrase:
"This package provides a System Settings panel to configure network file-
sharing using NFS and Samba."
is wrong. It should be something along the lines of:
"This package provides a way to configure network f
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 Long description is wrong
Bug #691634 [kdenetwork-filesharing] [kdenetwork-filesharing] Does not show
Changed Bug title to 'Long description is wrong' from '[kdenetwork-filesharing]
Does not show'
> severity -1 normal
Bug #691634 [kdenetwork-filesharing]
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.10.2012, 18:50 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Sonntag, den 28.10.2012, 00:14 +0900 schrieb YOSHINO Yoshihito:
> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Joachim Breitner
> > wrote:
> > > I see. Can you elaborate on the severity of the problem? Do such request
> > > header
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 686399 - wheezy-ignore
Bug #686399 [src:insighttoolkit4] insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on (at least) i386:
test suite errors
Removed tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
> tags 675315 - wheezy-ignore
Bug #675315 [src:vtk] vtk: FTBFS in experimental: expected type
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 691307 +patch
Bug #691307 [libpetsc3.2-dbg] libpetsc3.2-dbg: PETSC_CHECKS m4 macro fails with
PETSC_ARCH=linux-gnu-c-debug
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
691307: http://b
tags 691307 +patch
thanks
Hello,
the attached debdiff-patch hopefully fixes the issue.
The changes are committed to the git-repo of the
package [1].
Thanks,
Anton
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/petsc.git;a=commitdiff;h=409f694a5c93ed84f2ddb7eda2d1b88922528298
tags 686399 - wheezy-ignore
tags 675315 - wheezy-ignore
thanks
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 02:42 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> tags 686399 wheezy-ignore
> tags 675315 wheezy-ignore
> thanks
Please don't do that. You are neither on the release team nor, to the
best of my knowledge, consulted anyone
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 17:41 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 691180 - wheezy-ignore + sid experimental
[...]
> > Therefore, the bug does not affect wheezy and I’m tagging it
> > wheezy-ignore so that it does not count as an RC bug for wheezy.
>
> Close. :) I'm fixing the tags. The wheezy-ign
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat 27 Oct 2012 16:40:20 Filipus Klutiero escribió:
> Package: kdenetwork-filesharing
> Version: 4:4.8.4-1+b1
> Severity: serious
>
> kdenetwork-filesharing does not show. This is not very surprising if one
> looks at the list of files installed. As far as I can see, i
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #691634 [kdenetwork-filesharing] [kdenetwork-filesharing] Does not show
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
691634: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691634
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Package: libboost-mpi-python1.49.0
Version: 1.49.0-3.1
Severity: grave
If I try to import boost.mpi from a Python script that is not run through
mpirun and openmbi-bin is not installed, the import fails with:
[earth:26793] [[INVALID],INVALID] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: A system-required executable
either c
Package: kdenetwork-filesharing
Version: 4:4.8.4-1+b1
Severity: serious
kdenetwork-filesharing does not show. This is not very surprising if one
looks at the list of files installed. As far as I can see, installing it
makes no visible difference.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i38
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 691605 eglibc/2.13-36
Bug #691605 {Done: Michael Gilbert } [multiarch-support]
multiarch-support: Package priority standard too low, should be required
No longer marked as found in versions eglibc/2.13-36.
>
End of message, stopping proc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 691605 eglibc/2.13-34
Bug #691605 {Done: Michael Gilbert } [multiarch-support]
multiarch-support: Package priority standard too low, should be required
Marked as fixed in versions eglibc/2.13-34.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 18:32:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#662854: fixed in freerdp 1.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #662854,
regarding remmina crashes at random intervals
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:27:32 -0400
with message-id
and subject line re: multiarch-support: Package priority standard too low,
should be required
has caused the Debian Bug report #691605,
regarding multiarch-support: Package priority standard too low, should be
required
to be mar
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 18:17:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#691223: fixed in atanks 5.5+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #691223,
regarding atanks: source tarball includes Win32 binaries without source
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 691619 + pending
Bug #691619 [unburden-home-dir] unburden-home-dir: Option for a "dry run" is
ignored under some circumstances
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
691619: ht
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 691606 + moreinfo
Bug #691606 [locales] [locales] Causes system to fail to boot with floating
point exceptions
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> # machine-specific
> severity 691606 important
Bug #691606 [locales] [locales] Causes system to fail to b
tags 691606 + moreinfo
# machine-specific
severity 691606 important
quit
Hi,
Beojan Stanislaus wrote:
> This version of locales causes any script that includes the line
> . /etc/default/locales
>
> to exit with a floating point exception.
I don't have that file. I do have
$ grep .
Package: unburden-home-dir
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: grave
Justification: May cause data loss
Not yet sure what's the exact reason for this, but if the option -F
(don't use lsof) is given before the option -n (dry run), the option -n
seems to be ignored and unburden-home-dir does change things inst
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # the bug is fixed there, so lets keep that noted
> fixed 691600 1.3.4.1-1
Bug #691600 [libghc-warp-dev] libghc-warp-dev: does not parse request headers
correctly
Marked as fixed in versions haskell-warp/1.3.4.1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing he
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 28.10.2012, 00:14 +0900 schrieb YOSHINO Yoshihito:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > I see. Can you elaborate on the severity of the problem? Do such request
> > headers occur in common situations, or is it just a theoretical problem?
>
> Actuall
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 690766 + pending
Bug #690766 [rheolef] Submitted bug: rheolef_6.1-2 is wrongly packaged in sid &
wheezy ; a fix, as rheolef_6.1-3, is now available
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:00:29 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > make[2]: gmcs: Command not found
> > make[2]: *** [RHash.dll] Error 127
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/rhash-1.2.9/bindings/mono'
> > make[1]: *** [build-mono] Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/rhash-1
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 00:09:46 +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> According to debian/changelog, this was introduced in 1.4.6-1:
>
>* munin.postinst: only create link from /etc/munin/apache.conf to
> /etc/apache2/conf.d/munin on new installations, not on upgrades.
> (Closes: #619399)
>
> Afte
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:47:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#685281: fixed in tinyproxy 1.8.2-1squeeze3
has caused the Debian Bug report #685281,
regarding denial of service via many headers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:47:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#679069: fixed in viewvc 1.1.5-1.1+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #679069,
regarding CVE-2012-3356 / CVE-2012-3357
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:47:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#636805: fixed in viewvc 1.1.5-1.1+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #636805,
regarding viewvc runs extremely slowly (~15s per page)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
I don't see any weird conffile handling in pptpd's maintainer scripts.
However, it seems to me that somehow debsums got confused:
>> dpkg-deb -I pptpd_1.3.4-5_amd64.deb conffiles
/etc/pptpd.conf
/etc/ppp/pptpd-options
/etc/init.d/pptpd
/etc/ppp/pptpd-options
/etc/init.d/pptpd
/etc/pptpd.conf
That
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 691610
Bug #690766 [rheolef] Submitted bug: rheolef_6.1-2 is wrongly packaged in sid &
wheezy ; a fix, as rheolef_6.1-3, is now available
690766 was not blocked by any bugs.
690766 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 690766: 691610
--
6
Control: block -1 by 691610
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 04:20:09PM +0200, saramito wrote:
> The 6.1-2 rheolef library (sid & wheezy) is not usable as is
> and a new version is required:
> a fixed version of the rheolef debianization is available as 6.1-3 in svn.
Actually a simple rebuild fixes the re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 691612
Bug #691612 [elfutils] elfutils: Can't find ebl backends because of multiarch
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
691612: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Package: elfutils
Version: 0.152-1
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 0.153-1
It seems that the version in Wheezy is unable to open it's ebl
backends, and so is as good as useless.
It tries:
open("/usr/bin/../lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/elfutils/libebl_x86_64.so", O_RDONLY) =
-1 ENOENT (No such file o
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 0.153-1
Bug #691612 [elfutils] elfutils: Can't find ebl backends because of multiarch
Marked as fixed in versions elfutils/0.153-1.
--
691612: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691612
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> I see. Can you elaborate on the severity of the problem? Do such request
> headers occur in common situations, or is it just a theoretical problem?
Actually I have stuck in a warp server receiving request from Japanese
mobile phones
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 10:17 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:53:07 +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>
>> I can reproduce this with sbuild on sid-amd64. Did you guys all use
>> sbuild for testing?
>
> Nope, cowbuilder.
pbuilder here.
-- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
Ubuntu Developer
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 644299 + patch pending
Bug #644299 [certmaster] certmaster: uninstallable: Depends: python (< 2.7) but
2.7.2-7 is to be installed
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
> tags 652324 + patch pending
Bug #652324 [src:certmaster] certmaster: deprecat
tags 644299 + patch pending
tags 652324 + patch pending
tags 662607 + patch pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for certmaster (versioned as 0.25-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u certmaster-0.25/debian/c
Package: locales
Version: 2.13-36
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
This version of locales causes any script that includes the line
. /etc/default/locales
to exit with a floating point exception. Unfortunately, dash shows this as
multiple commands within the
Package: multiarch-support
Version: 2.13-36
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
Multiarch-support should have priority required:
Multiarch support is a release goal for wheezy and for this the package
multiarch-support exists.
Due to this nature many packages pre-depends on multi-arch, i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 690766 6.1-3
Bug #690766 [rheolef] Submitted bug: rheolef_6.1-2 is wrongly packaged in sid &
wheezy ; a fix, as rheolef_6.1-3, is now available
There is no source info for the package 'rheolef' at version '6.1-3' with
architecture ''
Un
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.10.2012, 23:37 +0900 schrieb YOSHINO Yoshihito:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Am Samstag, den 27.10.2012, 22:36 +0900 schrieb YOSHINO Yoshihito:
> >> Upstream has fixed the issue (tracked in
> >> https://github.com/yesodweb/wai/issues/76) a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package libghc-warp-dev
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'libghc-warp-dev'
Limit currently set to 'package':'libghc-warp-dev'
> reopen 691600
Bug #691600 {Done: Joachim Breitner } [libghc-warp-dev]
libghc-w
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Version: 1.3.4.1-1
>
> Am Samstag, den 27.10.2012, 22:36 +0900 schrieb YOSHINO Yoshihito:
>> Upstream has fixed the issue (tracked in
>> https://github.com/yesodweb/wai/issues/76) and released as warp 1.2.2
>> (while this requires si
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:31:46 +0200
with message-id <1351348306.17760.6.camel@kirk>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#691600: libghc-warp-dev:
does not parse request headers correctly
has caused the Debian Bug report #691600,
regarding libghc-warp-dev: does not pars
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package libghc-warp-dev
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'libghc-warp-dev'
Limit currently set to 'package':'libghc-warp-dev'
> forwarded 691600 https://github.com/yesodweb/wai/issues/76
Bug #691600 [libghc-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package libghc-warp-dev
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'libghc-warp-dev'
Limit currently set to 'package':'libghc-warp-dev'
> tags 691600 + fixed-upstream
Bug #691600 [libghc-warp-dev] libghc-warp-dev: doe
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:53:07 +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> I can reproduce this with sbuild on sid-amd64. Did you guys all use
> sbuild for testing?
Nope, cowbuilder.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux use
Package: libghc-warp-dev
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream patch
Dear Maintainer,
warp 1.2.1.1 does not parse request headers correctly, such as
multi-line headers, or a header with no space between colon and value.
Upstream has fixed the issue (tracked in
https://github.com/yesodweb/wai/issues/76)
Hi,
I can reproduce this with sbuild on sid-amd64. Did you guys all use
sbuild for testing?
Best regards,
Tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
control: severity -1 important
Josip,
Please don't upgrade the severity of this bug.
The defaults actually prevent further data loss for the majority of drbd users.
In the normal setup the drbd device is the main storage device so the
defaults make sense.
If you have a suggestion for a better d
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #576511 [drbd8-utils] drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions for
various drbd fault conditions - may cause dataloss.
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
--
576511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576511
D
Package: gdb
Version: 7.4.1
Severity: serious
Dell PowerEdge 3250
2x Itanium Madison 1.5GHz 6M
4GB RAM
I realized that GDB doesn't work as it should.
When GDB should run *any* target application, it always stops with
SIGTRAP 0x.
Example:
stephan@itanic:~$ gdb man
GNU gdb (
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:32:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#520753: fixed in ghostscript 9.05~dfsg-6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #520753,
regarding postinst couldn't change to /etc/cups/pppd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:32:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#475873: fixed in ghostscript 9.05~dfsg-6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #475873,
regarding gs-gpl: config files left around after switch to ghostscript
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 652315 - patch
Bug #652315 [src:mpi-defaults] Get this out of testing until its rdepends have
rebuilt
Removed tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
652315: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:10:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#690391: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #668947,
regarding bittwist: Segmentation fault on executing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:10:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#690391: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #584889,
regarding bittwist: Fails to work in 64bit-systems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Dear Michael,
I guess that lockmbox() should not be called on entry to deliver(),
but that block moved to after the first flock().
I wonder about the close(mbfd) in line 1370: should unlockmbox() be
called just after, and lockmbox() called again after the re-open and
subsequent flock()?
---
I w
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 09:54:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#690406: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #682882,
regarding inguma: Recommends non-existent python-qt3 package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #682426 [ghostscript] ghostscript: converting a PDF file to PostScript
takes several minutes consuming 100 % of CPU
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
--
682426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682426
Debian Bug Tracking
control: severity -1 normal
> From an up-to-date Wheezy, /usr/bin/pdf2ps takes a long time of 100% CPU, but
> succeeds in creating a 3.6 M PS file out of this small PDF.
One particular file that happens to take a while to convert is not a
severe enough issue to justify rc status.
Best wishes,
Mi
Your message dated Sat, 27 Oct 2012 09:17:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#690376: fixed in libproxy 0.3.1-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690376,
regarding libproxy: PAC handling insufficient content length check leading to
buffer overflow
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #690376 [libproxy] libproxy: PAC handling insufficient content length check
leading to buffer overflow
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #690376 to the same tags previously set
--
690376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690376
control: tag -1 patch
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
libproxy.patch
Description: Binary data
Following on Philipp's comment, I went looking for explanation in the old
template config file changes, and found the sysrq calls added with no
obvious explanation here:
http://git.drbd.org/gitweb.cgi?p=drbd-8.3.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b4452d69b4371dbeee5a38f2e248a6360c14c77
But this is still conditio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 688842 + pending
Bug #688842 [perl] CPAN modules no longer installed to /usr/local by default
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
688842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
94 matches
Mail list logo
