Hi Aron,
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
> ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
> version very soon.
I just saw in the git repo:
ibus (1.5.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
_ i
Hi Aron,
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> Thanks for the follow up! I'm looking for the possibility of automate
> update to 1.5, and it seems to be OK. I'll write the migration howto
> if that's not possible.
Great, thanks
> Be a bit more patient, :-) I've started working on ibus-anthy alrea
Hi Aron,
thanks for your message.
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
> ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
> version very soon.
No, I *have* gir1.2-ibus-1.0 installed and it does not work.
It is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 692453 by 700076
Bug #692453 [gnome-control-center] unable to select keyboard layout from
gnome-control center
692453 was blocked by: 700076
692453 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 692453: 700076
> thanks
Stopping pro
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> thanks for taking care for that.
>
> On Fr, 08 Feb 2013, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> This is somewhat expected complication which I am no expert to explain.
>>
>> Aron,
>>
>> What we need is a wiki.debian.org/ibus page which describe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 700076 + patch pending
Bug #700076 [ibus] ibus: non-functional, setup breaks
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> > Hi,
Unknown command or malfo
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:40:15PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> > Package: ibus
>> > Version: 1.5.1-1
>>
>> a similar statement goes for the predecessor versi
Hi,
The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
version very soon.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Package: ibus
> Version: 1.5.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders pack
Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2013 05:47:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#700088: fixed in boxshade 3.3.1-8~experimental1
has caused the Debian Bug report #700088,
regarding boxshade: fails finding the alignment file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2013 03:17:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#700088: fixed in boxshade 3.3.1-7+wheezy1
has caused the Debian Bug report #700088,
regarding boxshade: fails finding the alignment file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 700088 serious
Bug #700088 [boxshade] boxshade: fails finding the alignment file
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
700088: http://bugs.debian.org/c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 78 -unreproducible
Bug #78 [src:net-tools] FTBFS: strip.c:24:28: fatal error:
linux/if_strip.h: No such file or directory
Removed tag(s) unreproducible.
> severity 78 important
Bug #78 [src:net-tools] FTBFS: strip.c:24:28: fa
tags 78 -unreproducible
severity 78 important
kthxbye
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:12:05PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> I am not able to reproduce FTBFS in a clean
> environment. Please, confirm.
After more checking, it appears to build in pbuilder but not on my live
system. The latter is
Your message dated Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:47:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#697930: fixed in nagios3 3.2.1-2+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #697930,
regarding nagios3: CVE-2012-6096
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:04:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#698545: fixed in haskell-tls-extra 0.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #698545,
regarding Basic constraints vulnerability
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Control: tags -1 + pending
Since pygtk finally compiled on ia64, I have uploaded to DELAYED/2 a NMU
of python-numpy. The debdiff is attached.
--
.''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
diff -Nru python-n
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #685812 [python-numpy] ABI change in 1.6.1 version
Added tag(s) pending.
--
685812: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685812
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Hi,
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - the security team's implications about Oracle's binary releases, and
>OpenJDK, which are just wrong.
>
>Andrew Haley made this clear in
>https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2013/02/msg5.html
I was under that false impression as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 78 +unreproducible
Bug #78 [src:net-tools] FTBFS: strip.c:24:28: fatal error:
linux/if_strip.h: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
tags 78 +unreproducible
thanks
I am not able to reproduce FTBFS in a clean
environment. Please, confirm.
Thanks,
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 19:29 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 02/07/13 18:07, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
>> Update: the armhf build failed because about 100 testcases fail.
Hmm, presumably it worked at some point, given there are armhf binaries
in unstable. :-(
> > Given that the 3.0 version w
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Friday 8 February 19:03:09 UTC 2013
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/skytools3";>skytools3
> tags 644540
On 02/08/2013 04:14 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> I'm going to test it during a few days.
thank you very much, intrigeri!
> Looks like a good plan, but I suggest waiting a bit longer for:
>
> 1. You and someone else (I volunteer) to try the proposed package
> for a few days: given t-p-u uploads
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 700098 grave
Bug #700098 [cfingerd] cfingerd: CVE-2013-1049 remote buffer overflow
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
700098: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Your message dated Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:47:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#699051: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #694589,
regarding lastfmproxy: python module/script files in wrong location
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> You have latest ibus and ibus-table upstream release in unstable now.
>
> I just want to remind you guys that other components of IBus may need
> update also.
> For example latest upstream release of ibus-anthy is 1.5.0 while you
> have 1.2.x som
Your message dated Fri, 8 Feb 2013 19:05:47 +0100
with message-id <20130208180547.ga5...@jwilk.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#699455: libiulib0d fails to install (dependencies
problem)
has caused the Debian Bug report #699455,
regarding libiulib0d fails to install (dependencies problem)
to be marke
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 692453 by 700076
Bug #692453 [gnome-control-center] unable to select keyboard layout from
gnome-control center
692453 was not blocked by any bugs.
692453 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 692453: 700076
> after installing
As I checked the debian/rules file and the errors given, it should be
clear that the IBus itself is not built correctly.
You build flags looks reasonable but they are different from Arch's
and Fedora's.
(Arch and Fedora have been using IBus 1.5 for a while.)
You probably hit some build system quir
Hi Kurt,
Am 08.02.2013 18:18, schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:33:04PM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
>> Hi Kurt,
>>
>> please look into Readme.debian.
>>
>> Does the problem also accur if you start sks_build.sh as root and later
>> chown the file as stated in readme.debian?
>
>
You have latest ibus and ibus-table upstream release in unstable now.
I just want to remind you guys that other components of IBus may need
update also.
For example latest upstream release of ibus-anthy is 1.5.0 while you
have 1.2.x something.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:33:04PM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> please look into Readme.debian.
>
> Does the problem also accur if you start sks_build.sh as root and later
> chown the file as stated in readme.debian?
I did read README.Debian, and it said to use the exact command
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 72 patch
Bug #72 [curl] curl: CVE-2013-0249
Added tag(s) patch.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
72: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=72
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
tags 72 patch
kthxbye
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: curl
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> http://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20130206.html
>
> Remember we're in freeze, so please upload only the minimal security fix.
Thanks for the report, I was on train when I first saw the report,
I'll deal with it very soon.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Package: ibus
> Version: 1.5.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to run ibus from experimen
Hi,
I also ran into the same problems with the update to ibus 1.5.1. The
error in ibus-setup comes from the fact that self.__bus.get_config()
returns None instead of a config object.
This is a simple Python program that reproduces this behavior.
from gi.repository import IBus
b=IBus.Bus()
print
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 689930 - upstream
Bug #689930 [evolution-data-server] evolution-data-server: Missing Breaks
against libebook-1.2-13 and libecal-1.2-11
Bug #694735 [evolution-data-server] empathy: Fails to start due to missing
'org.gnome.Evolution.DefaultSo
Package: vuze
Version: 4.3.0.6-5
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
I just installed Vuze and want to try it out.
Almost every time when I started it and want to search for a term to
find, Vuze crashed with the output on xterm:
vuze
file:/usr/lib/jni/ ; file:/u
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 699739 evolution-data-server
Bug #699739 [evolution] Calendars lost in upgrade from 3.4.4 to 3.6.3
Bug reassigned from package 'evolution' to 'evolution-data-server'.
No longer marked as found in versions evolution/3.6.3-1.
Ignoring reque
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:41:11PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Same here, but I cannot event switch fro ibus-mozc to ibus-anthy,
> because no activation of ibus works.
I meant: I have all of ibus, scim and fctix installed. One of them
really *should* work, at any given point in time.
Kind
Fix PM suspend() broken by emergency patches, thanks to Philip Langdale for
pointing out.
...But PM resume() didn't work anyway with the original code, always err
invalid args.
Recommended workaround user space PM handling for ACPI S3:
/etc/pm/config.d/00suspend_modules:2:SUSPEND_MODULES="dvb
On Fr, 08 Feb 2013, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I thought about that it looks we need to rebuild mozc* and
After rebuiling mozc with ibus 1.5.1 libs I now get a different
error message when trying to run ibus-setup, which hints in the
right direction:
$ ibus-setup
Traceback (most recent call last):
On Fr, 08 Feb 2013, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > And, what is it? I would like to get my Japanese input running again ;-)
>
> dunno, but I have a bunch of input method systems (ibus + some)
> installed simulanously, just in case one breaks down. In such a case, I
> can simply activate another (hopefull
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:24:59PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> And, what is it? I would like to get my Japanese input running again ;-)
dunno, but I have a bunch of input method systems (ibus + some)
installed simulanously, just in case one breaks down. In such a case, I
can simply acti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 699859 PlayOnLinux doesn't start on kFreeBSD
Bug #699859 [playonlinux] PlayOnLinux doesn't start
Changed Bug title to 'PlayOnLinux doesn't start on kFreeBSD' from 'PlayOnLinux
doesn't start'
> severity 699859 important
Bug #699859 [playon
Dear all,
thanks for taking care for that.
On Fr, 08 Feb 2013, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> This is somewhat expected complication which I am no expert to explain.
>
> Aron,
>
> What we need is a wiki.debian.org/ibus page which describes post-1.5
> migration howto. I am sure you have already done some.
Hi Kurt,
please look into Readme.debian.
Does the problem also accur if you start sks_build.sh as root and later
chown the file as stated in readme.debian?
Christoph
Am 05.02.2013 21:45, schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> Package: sks
> Version: 1.1.3-1
>
> Hi,
>
> I installed sks and tried to import a d
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:40:15PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Package: ibus
> > Version: 1.5.1-1
>
> a similar statement goes for the predecessor version,
> 1.4.99.20120917-3. I get that same import error, too.
>
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:40:15PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Package: ibus
> Version: 1.5.1-1
a similar statement goes for the predecessor version,
1.4.99.20120917-3. I get that same import error, too.
I really hoped that 1.5.1 would fix, not exacerbate or continue,
the situation.
I
Package: ibus
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I am trying to run ibus from experimental, but it does not work
at all anymore. Ctrl-Space does not activate anything,
LEFT clicking on the GNOME kbd indicator in the top bar does only
show a small grey rec
Hi,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (08 Feb 2013 05:48:55 GMT) :
> I've just pushed a proposed upstream msva-perl/0.8.1 targetted bugfix
> tag to git://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/msva-perl, and a "wheezy"
> branch that uses that and targets testing-proposed-updates.
Excellent! Thanks a lot.
> I've te
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 00:26 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > In fact nothing is new here and security wouldn't change much with different
> > keys. The implementation ist just broken. But if you have an idea to improve
> > it, feel free to sen
52 matches
Mail list logo
