Processed: bug 708800 is forwarded to https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/1181678
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 708800 https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/1181678 Bug #708800 [src:enblend-enfuse] enblend-enfuse: FTBFS: [../../doc/enblend.info] Error Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/1181678'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708800: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708800 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542570: marked as done (gnome-photo-printer: uses libgnomeprint which is scheduled for removal)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 07:31:40 + with message-id e1udy5k-6m...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708777: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #542570, regarding gnome-photo-printer: uses libgnomeprint which is scheduled for removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 542570: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542570 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: gnome-photo-printer Version: 0.7.0-1 Severity: important User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: oldlibs libgnomeprint Hi, gnome-photo-printer currently still uses libgnomeprint. However, libgnomeprint and libgnomeprintui are going to be soon deprecated upstream. The GtkPrint replacement (built in GTK+ itself) has been available for 3 years. Iâd like to remove libgnomeprint packages before the squeeze release. This can only be done by getting rid of as much as possible of the reverse dependencies. Note that some of these packages already include GtkPrint support, but you have to select it at compile time. Otherwise, please consider porting to the much more modern Cairo/GtkPrint API. As for bindings, they donât have any reverse dependencies except for the Python ones, so they should simply be removed ASAP. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' âI recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand thingsâ -- Jörg Schilling ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.7.0-1.2+rm Dear submitter, as the package gnome-photo-printer has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708777 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#542572: marked as done (gnome-u2ps: uses libgnomeprint which is scheduled for removal)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 07:37:11 + with message-id e1udyb5-0002sg...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708778: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #542572, regarding gnome-u2ps: uses libgnomeprint which is scheduled for removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 542572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542572 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: gnome-u2ps Version: 0.0.4-4.1 Severity: important User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: oldlibs libgnomeprint Hi, gnome-u2ps currently still uses libgnomeprint. However, libgnomeprint and libgnomeprintui are going to be soon deprecated upstream. The GtkPrint replacement (built in GTK+ itself) has been available for 3 years. Iâd like to remove libgnomeprint packages before the squeeze release. This can only be done by getting rid of as much as possible of the reverse dependencies. Note that some of these packages already include GtkPrint support, but you have to select it at compile time. Otherwise, please consider porting to the much more modern Cairo/GtkPrint API. As for bindings, they donât have any reverse dependencies except for the Python ones, so they should simply be removed ASAP. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' âI recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand thingsâ -- Jörg Schilling ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.0.4-4.2+rm Dear submitter, as the package gnome-u2ps has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708778 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#707886: marked as done (assogiate: depends on libgnome-vfsmm which is going away)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 07:37:20 + with message-id e1udybe-0002wr...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708762: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #707886, regarding assogiate: depends on libgnome-vfsmm which is going away to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 707886: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707886 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: assogiate Version: 0.2.1-5 Severity: serious User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: oldlibs gnomevfs Tags: jessie sid Hi, assogiate depends on libgnome-vfsmm-2.6-1c2a which is going away. Please port your package away from it. GIO (available from glibmm) should have similar functionality. Thanks, Emilio ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.2.1-5+rm Dear submitter, as the package assogiate has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708762 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#708801: marked as done (qemu-kvm: FTBFS: qemu-conf--10052-.c:5: undefined reference to `pthread_create')
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 07:35:33 + with message-id e1udy9v-0001pb...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708815: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #708801, regarding qemu-kvm: FTBFS: qemu-conf--10052-.c:5: undefined reference to `pthread_create' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 708801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708801 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: qemu-kvm Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130517 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc -fPIE -DPIE -m64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -Wstrict-prototypes -Wredundant-decls -Wall -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -fstack-protector-all -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wempty-body -Wnested-externs -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Winit-self -Wignored-qualifiers -Wold-style-declaration -Wold-style-definition -Wtype-limits -I/usr/include/libpng12 -o /tmp/qemu-conf--10052-.exe /tmp/qemu-conf--10052-.c -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -pie -m64 -g -Wl,-z,relro /tmp/ccfI4W1b.o: In function `main': /tmp/qemu-conf--10052-.c:5: undefined reference to `pthread_create' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status The full build log is available from: http://deiv.vzpla.net/logs/2013/05/17/qemu-kvm_1.1.2+dfsg-6_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-6+rm Dear submitter, as the package qemu-kvm has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708815 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#708858: Installation: Screen and keyboard freeze (but not mouse) right after login on post-install Debian
Package: general Severity: critical Dear Maintainer, I installed Debian on a i5 750 (so no integrated graphics), GTX 590, Intel SSD system. The installation runned fine. However, after booting with GRUB in normal mode, the system freezes after log in (or before if I run the mouse over the log in boxes, over GNOME classic etc.), i.e. stops doing anything. While I can still move my mouse's cursor around on the screen without beeing able to interact with anything, the keyboard does not do anything. I have USB mouse and keyboard, and VGA screen. There is no sound coming out. Thinking this was a graphical problem, I ran some research on how to install nvidia drivers and tried some command lines : it couldn't find the packages, neither the deb command. When trying to continue looking at Xorg config, the directory wasn't found (i.e. can't cd in it) though it was displayed with dir command. It was really confusing, and my problem still isn't solved. I have tried installing Debian with no-inst, live cd, DVD and expert DVD with KDE installations, with the same outcome. Ubuntu's live cd does not even load, however. Windows 7 x64 runs fine on the same SSD drive. My system is not overclocked and all BIOS settings were brought back to default without effect. I would have expected Debian to boot right out of the box, as it did in Live CD, but well :'(. I am not good at all with Linux distributions as it is my first encounter with those, but I allowed myself to put critical. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Added by me: (surely hardware related problem ?) Motherboard: P7P55D CPU: i5 750 (socket 1156) SSD: Intel 'something' 180GB GPU: Gigabyte GTX 590 Sound card: Asus Xonar D2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708860: GFDL with invariant section
Package: src:chromium-browser Severity: serious user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant Your chaintools file include some file with gfdl with invariant and front cover sections. Please repackage. search bfd.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#617613: May I upload FreeCAD into wheezy-backports?
Dear all, FreeCAD has been removed from Wheezy during the freeze period due to the bug #617613 (links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries). Though, seems, the issue is almost resolved, it is still not clear, whether is it possible to distribute the package, linked against the old Coin3D version. Adam D. Barratt has summarized the problem and asked the upstream to clear it [1]: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:29:11 + Coin3D developers - this relates to a license issue in the Debian Linux distribution concerning the linking of Coin3D to code licensed in a GPL-incompatible manner. Later releases of Coin3D were relicensed under a BSD license, but it is unclear whether this applies to earlier releases of the code. Please could you confirm whether you consider version 3.1.3 to be released under the BSD-style license as well, or if this version is still covered by the GPL license it was originally released under? But we still have no an answer from them. May I upload the current FreeCAD version into backports, linked against the old Coin3D version? New Coin3D version is already in experimental, but it requires transition process. So I think it will be almost impossible to bring the library into backports as well. FreeCAD is a popular package and Wheezy's users really need that. I have got some private mails from them with the question, why FreeCAD is not in Wheezy and whether is it possible to bring it there. Thanks all for opinions, Anton [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617613#237 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#708863: GFDL with invariant section
Package: src:dico Severity: serious user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant dico.info as front cover please render dfsg compliant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#707502: graphviz: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/usr/lib/graphviz/python26': No such file or directory
Hi, the attached patch fixes the build error. There might be issues left for a complete python transition, though. Roland --- graphviz-2.26.3/debian/libgv-python.install.orig 2013-05-19 11:14:41.702402839 +0200 +++ graphviz-2.26.3/debian/libgv-python.install 2013-05-19 11:14:46.770404098 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ usr/lib/graphviz/python -usr/lib/graphviz/python26 usr/lib/graphviz/python27 usr/share/man/man3/gv.3python
Processed: tagging 707502
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 707502 + patch Bug #707502 [src:graphviz] graphviz: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/usr/lib/graphviz/python26': No such file or directory Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 707502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707502 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#681749: marked as done (cracklib2: FTBFS with Python 3.3: ImportError: No module named '_cracklib')
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 09:33:04 +
with message-id e1udzze-0007vb...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#681749: fixed in cracklib2 2.8.22-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681749,
regarding cracklib2: FTBFS with Python 3.3: ImportError: No module named
'_cracklib'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
681749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: cracklib2
Version: 2.8.19-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.3
cracklib2 FTBFS if built against Python 3.3:
| for i in 2.6 2.7 3.3; do \
| cd
/build/cracklib2-yqgv7c/cracklib2-2.8.19/debian/buildtmp/python$i/python/$(_py_=$i;
python${_py_#python*} -c 'from distutils.command.build import build; from
distutils.core import Distribution; b = build(Distribution());
b.finalize_options(); print(b.build_platlib)'); \
|
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/build/cracklib2-yqgv7c/cracklib2-2.8.19/debian/buildtmp/base/lib/.libs
python$i \
| -c 'import cracklib;
cracklib.test(dictpath=/build/cracklib2-yqgv7c/cracklib2-2.8.19/debian/tmp/cracklib_dict)';
\
| done
| ...
| --
| Ran 11 tests in 0.008s
|
| OK
| cracklib is installed in:
| cracklib version: 2.8.19
| 2.6.8 (unknown, Jun 28 2012, 18:14:12)
| [GCC 4.7.1]
| ...
| --
| Ran 11 tests in 0.010s
|
| OK
| cracklib is installed in:
| cracklib version: 2.8.19
| 2.7.3 (default, Jul 13 2012, 22:29:01)
| [GCC 4.7.1]
| Traceback (most recent call last):
| File string, line 1, in module
| File frozen importlib._bootstrap, line 1294, in _find_and_load
| File frozen importlib._bootstrap, line 1261, in _find_and_load_unlocked
| File frozen importlib._bootstrap, line 432, in _check_name_wrapper
| File frozen importlib._bootstrap, line 778, in load_module
| File frozen importlib._bootstrap, line 759, in load_module
| File frozen importlib._bootstrap, line 408, in module_for_loader_wrapper
| File frozen importlib._bootstrap, line 647, in _load_module
| File ./cracklib.py, line 28, in module
| from _cracklib import FascistCheck
| File frozen importlib._bootstrap, line 1294, in _find_and_load
| File frozen importlib._bootstrap, line 1258, in _find_and_load_unlocked
| ImportError: No module named '_cracklib'
| make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/cracklib2-yqgv7c/cracklib2-2.8.19'
| make: *** [build] Error 2
I believe this is due to this change:
The range of possible file names for C extensions has been narrowed.
Very rarely used spellings have been suppressed: under POSIX, files
named xxxmodule.so, xxxmodule.abi3.so and xxxmodule.cpython-*.so are no
longer recognized as implementing the xxx module. If you had been
generating such files, you have to switch to the other spellings (i.e.,
remove the module string from the file names).
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html#building-c-extensions
--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: cracklib2
Source-Version: 2.8.22-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cracklib2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 681...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jan Dittberner ja...@debian.org (supplier of updated cracklib2 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 11:02:35 +0200
Source: cracklib2
Binary: libcrack2 libcrack2-dev cracklib-runtime python-cracklib
python3-cracklib
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.8.22-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jan Dittberner ja...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jan Dittberner ja...@debian.org
Description:
cracklib-runtime - runtime support for password checker library cracklib2
libcrack2 - pro-active password checker library
libcrack2-dev - pro-active password checker library - development files
python-cracklib - Python bindings for
Bug#617613: May I upload FreeCAD into wheezy-backports?
On Sun, 19 May 2013 11:04:54 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote: [...] May I upload the current FreeCAD version into backports, linked against the old Coin3D version? I am under the impression that the same reasoning that led to the decision to remove freecad from wheezy would apply to wheezy-backport as well. Or am I missing something? [...] FreeCAD is a popular package and Wheezy's users really need that. I have got some private mails from them with the question, why FreeCAD is not in Wheezy and whether is it possible to bring it there. That's really unfortunate: it's the exact scenario that I feared it would materialize. That's why I have been struggling since April 2009 in order to persuade OpenCASCADE S.A.S. to re-license the OpenCASCADE Technology framework under GPL-compatible terms... No public news from them on this front yet, sadly. :-( http://bugs.debian.org/617613#173 Please recall that this would be the ideal solution: so I renew my call for help on this front. This is what I have repeated like a broken record for ages: please get in touch with OpenCASCADE S.A.S. and persuade them to re-license the OpenCASCADE Technology framework under GPL-compatible terms! http://bugs.debian.org/617613#5 http://bugs.debian.org/617613#59 On the other hand, getting rid of all the GPL-licensed parts and dependencies of FreeCAD is a sub-optimal solution (although it's still a solution for FreeCAD...). The re-licensing of Coin3D under a BSD license is a step towards the sub-optimal solution (the other step is getting rid of any remaining GPL-licensed code included in FreeCAD itself). http://bugs.debian.org/617613#158 -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpq6dYoXp1Z6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#708867: GFDL invariant visit oreilly website in the russian version
Package: src:docbook-defguide user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious Russian version under version.xml contain a backcover that ask to visit oreilly website Please remove the ru version or check if newer version is without this problem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#617613: May I upload FreeCAD into wheezy-backports?
On 05/19/2013 11:44 AM, Francesco Poli wrote: On Sun, 19 May 2013 11:04:54 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote: [...] May I upload the current FreeCAD version into backports, linked against the old Coin3D version? I am under the impression that the same reasoning that led to the decision to remove freecad from wheezy would apply to wheezy-backport as well. Or am I missing something? Well it is unclear, whether the old Coin3D version was relicensed under BSD or not. Upstream did not answer the question. If it was relicensed, then we can safely upload it into backports. [...] FreeCAD is a popular package and Wheezy's users really need that. I have got some private mails from them with the question, why FreeCAD is not in Wheezy and whether is it possible to bring it there. That's really unfortunate: it's the exact scenario that I feared it would materialize. That's why I have been struggling since April 2009 in order to persuade OpenCASCADE S.A.S. to re-license the OpenCASCADE Technology framework under GPL-compatible terms... No public news from them on this front yet, sadly. :-( http://bugs.debian.org/617613#173 Please recall that this would be the ideal solution: so I renew my call for help on this front. This is what I have repeated like a broken record for ages: please get in touch with OpenCASCADE S.A.S. and persuade them to re-license the OpenCASCADE Technology framework under GPL-compatible terms! http://bugs.debian.org/617613#5 http://bugs.debian.org/617613#59 Francesco, I do appreciate your try to do it. But I think, if OpenCASCADE S.A.S does not really want to do it, we can do almost nothing with that. You are not the one, who was trying to do it, but no decision yet. On the other hand, getting rid of all the GPL-licensed parts and dependencies of FreeCAD is a sub-optimal solution (although it's still a solution for FreeCAD...). The re-licensing of Coin3D under a BSD license is a step towards the sub-optimal solution (the other step is getting rid of any remaining GPL-licensed code included in FreeCAD itself). http://bugs.debian.org/617613#158 This sub-optimal solution is unfortunately the only possible one now to keep the package in Debian. It would be also good to warn the new projects, who are starting to use Opencascade, about possible problems with the license in the future. Thanks, Anton signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#708868: GFDL with no invariant in gmp source dir
Package: src:ecl user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious GMP is know for including GFDL with invariant version. Please repackage ecl in order to avoid this problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708793: syslog-ng 3.3.6-2 FTBFS with ivykis 0.36-2
The problem here is that lib/mainloop.c does not #include iv_event.h, even though it uses stuff from it. Prior to ivykis 0.36, iv_event.h was included by iv.h, so this problem did not surface. With 0.36, it does, and the simplest fix is to apply this patch to syslog-ng: https://github.com/algernon/syslog-ng/commit/92c3dd3b35badf1d866961cafb57dee3b5cc8abb Or, even better, package a newer upstream version, 3.3.9 or 3.4.1. Though, from the 3.4 branch, 3.4.2 is expected to be released in a week or two, so I'd suggest packaging 3.3.9 instead, which already contains the above fix. As for packaging new ivykis versions: I'm following the stable-* branches, and 0.36 is thet latest from there. 0.39, while newer, is not something I would package. (I discussed this with ivykis upstream, and will move the ivykis package to another version if and when he makes a new stable release). Regarding this problem, it simply needs a newer syslog-ng. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#705684: marked as done (padevchooser: FTBFS: atomic_ops.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 10:18:51 + with message-id e1ue0hx-0006p5...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#705684: fixed in padevchooser 0.9.4-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #705684, regarding padevchooser: FTBFS: atomic_ops.h: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 705684: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705684 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: padevchooser Version: 0.9.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Builds of padevchooser in minimal environments (as on Debian's autobuilders) have been failing: In file included from ./pulsecore/refcnt.h:25:0, from browser.c:37: ./pulsecore/atomic.h:492:24: fatal error: atomic_ops.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[3]: *** [browser.o] Error 1 Could you please declare a build dependency on libatomic-ops-dev and confirm with pbuilder or the like that you haven't missed any others? Thanks! ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: padevchooser Source-Version: 0.9.4-1.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of padevchooser, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 705...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org (supplier of updated padevchooser package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 11:43:08 +0200 Source: padevchooser Binary: padevchooser Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.9.4-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Barak A. Pearlmutter b...@debian.org Changed-By: Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org Description: padevchooser - PulseAudio Device Chooser Closes: 705684 Changes: padevchooser (0.9.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/control: Add libatomic-ops-dev to Build-Depends. (Closes: #705684) Checksums-Sha1: 1997421ff466db37aaa6f74b1a34120cce35a914 1992 padevchooser_0.9.4-1.1.dsc c95a13ad9c7b8df87fb9b001ff7fc5cf31ec0df4 3157 padevchooser_0.9.4-1.1.debian.tar.gz d802dba64cfefbe1c97f4a894b578840eaa4cddc 23736 padevchooser_0.9.4-1.1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 23ecc5584608bc8002fe9ab96d11a158e79fc2042c1cba70ae11249d54b690bc 1992 padevchooser_0.9.4-1.1.dsc bbc9db3603921bcb40f7b074e0447907abc221e67d2c7644af9f94c978cea388 3157 padevchooser_0.9.4-1.1.debian.tar.gz a250273984bef9c8dac05ccc7689b8a9b9a41cd2326e1782a4397d019e1cd53e 23736 padevchooser_0.9.4-1.1_amd64.deb Files: 4c43d3f9bc9cc3d4e31f4769906bffc7 1992 sound optional padevchooser_0.9.4-1.1.dsc 04883abcfd8096d8bb62451870d24c03 3157 sound optional padevchooser_0.9.4-1.1.debian.tar.gz d98cde63fceb619fd77d78f953c3d265 23736 sound optional padevchooser_0.9.4-1.1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRl04nAAoJEGny/FFupxmTj6QP/iPuNFv3S9DwIuP5lpjVUjwQ KtqcfrZGbyu6Pyejmec7O33GSdA5sXIwVkxTpdPyXQAIl17kgwsB9PqXyRv+QgZD 8UWQC5T26mXLdAmyw91OTIq4IsQgA2u8qqBFJT6b8MwPxnav7QvabgcjDDW7343X eOmbaFMtabq6j3SnuEcAj/HR3toXdZzqe4Rtva2hbJUs8CjjXJW3of7QvWRfIIX1 hdEl2gN1C74r6hETxFNZJxByNS1avHZ7xBJqPqISoNfZ2H0qhvG0q01BetmrXBlN FNY7C5DgpNni7YbcuLm6gHqy655HlXajiEcd9vjpjI1fAUm0Yn93slBeLCa4d6as 7MOcQlE6y5Lwimg90FOXbiqfPQNi+MRskYEUQfH8Ugtm2P0omSb3VM82TcAk9CpJ hv6M2LjUqzIzPk7F1Elz/GfV5kd//rXytD+b7IesIGqtCzmnoK3rI/GpVK2B6kYB ubJ7ur7V9vmrBkP09BFMQOhl0/ukL2RusFeMHHUeZbJpBDcxNYDjmoUJXjwTLoii UQD98hkYDOoNEvJaooghzO2bHi4DUn+jK5jaSUwJDsBuW9X/Dx5RpbkloddiboWn XOcKX9czuFMBeJwQvhlQ7WFC2cGWsc2J1hzVDbhYHS9PzXx6gdpvf1ddItJp/67f hsoJymaiHJOLtj+f+s9J =jW1l -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#708873: GFDL invariant
Package: src:eclipse-linuxtools user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious The file libhover/org.eclipse.linuxtools.cdt.libhover.glibc/data/glibc-2.14.xml has a problem This file documents the GNU C library. This is based on Edition 0.12, last updated 2007-10-27 of The GNU C Library Reference Manual, for version 2.8. Copyright (C) 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2007, 2008, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the Invariant Sections being ``Free Software Needs Free Documentation'' and ``GNU Lesser General Public License'', the Front-Cover texts being ``A GNU Manual'', and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License. (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF supports it in developing GNU and promoting software freedom.'' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708543: Re : Re : Bug#708543: geogebra: Geogebra crashes now on start
severity 708543 normal retitle 708543 geogebra: detect and avoid headless JREs thanks Hi. Il 18/05/2013 14:15, nicolas.patr...@gmail.com ha scritto: It lives! Thanks. I don’t know why this package was uninstalled or not installed. Ok, then I'm degrading and retitling the bug report. I still hope someone in the Java team to have some suggestion about how to handle this problem. Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 692390 + pending Bug #692390 [mod-wsgi] mod-wsgi: FTBFS against python3.3 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 692390: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692390 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#708543: Re : Re : Bug#708543: geogebra: Geogebra crashes now on start
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 708543 normal Bug #708543 [geogebra] geogebra: Geogebra crashes now on start Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' retitle 708543 geogebra: detect and avoid headless JREs Bug #708543 [geogebra] geogebra: Geogebra crashes now on start Changed Bug title to 'geogebra: detect and avoid headless JREs' from 'geogebra: Geogebra crashes now on start' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708543: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708543 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#707805: marked as done (Please drop python2.6-argparse build-dependency)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 10:48:42 + with message-id e1ue1aq-0006ir...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#707805: fixed in sorl-thumbnail 11.12-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #707805, regarding Please drop python2.6-argparse build-dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 707805: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707805 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: sorl-thumbnail Version: 11.12-4 Severity: important User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python2.6-removal Please remove python2.6-argparse build-dependency. python-argparse is a backport for Python 2.6 of a module already available in 2.7, and python2.6 is being dropped from Debian. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: sorl-thumbnail Source-Version: 11.12-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sorl-thumbnail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 707...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org (supplier of updated sorl-thumbnail package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 12:14:39 +0200 Source: sorl-thumbnail Binary: python-sorl-thumbnail Architecture: source all Version: 11.12-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org Description: python-sorl-thumbnail - thumbnail support for the Django framework Closes: 707805 Changes: sorl-thumbnail (11.12-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. . [ Jakub Wilk ] * Use canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields. . [ Sebastian Ramacher ] * debian/patches/django1.5.patch: - Fix FTBFS with Django 1.5 (Closes: #707805). . [ Luca Falavigna ] * Remove python2.6-argparse from Build-Depends field. Checksums-Sha1: ab109e7e3fb1d0a951cd34c545db57bf71f64dff sorl-thumbnail_11.12-5.dsc 0bef175c9c5c2d7b2d596718d45604caabc8ee94 5943 sorl-thumbnail_11.12-5.debian.tar.gz 62171ef33044bdd37a94fcadce669340a2460b54 68696 python-sorl-thumbnail_11.12-5_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: dbea888b93200d1a3cd59956b79740a809dcb1649987fdc8767059a689022de7 sorl-thumbnail_11.12-5.dsc 86ac6055140427357b6f6dca96c84d7f98aea73f2cc7629cacef23bf2e49c34d 5943 sorl-thumbnail_11.12-5.debian.tar.gz 76bc11f900b90165a23b1451687bed60b6a7668a0a0fef1cd3079c973f6348e1 68696 python-sorl-thumbnail_11.12-5_all.deb Files: e2d52d3854803ef4183afe48fd9d4c70 python optional sorl-thumbnail_11.12-5.dsc 66d05eceea6a3c475986ed8639a60147 5943 python optional sorl-thumbnail_11.12-5.debian.tar.gz 218addd4873b0b4e230f07d256cfa187 68696 python optional python-sorl-thumbnail_11.12-5_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRmKlWAAoJEEkIatPr4vMfkncP/2Un4Mj7TAQgrNxAZdmXc7hW ST2iUPR4Zw0lUKcVRyTJ0eoo9ZWBfps27Ruk6ix3t9TXTzWF44fwuC/KPPKizLKi 2isqZx9c20Wz4IsAxNMAz55SzI8RQiV7E1zIvFJ+IfB9egNKs0YM2Lu13jmM092q TKLg+5KdgGHPsk0SZiZLSPFeX329/FcT8jbqRA50Rat0qxdR1Yd1JYJXiPoc720F zbk7ajuM13GwL3MTB90OFC/Dax7y2F+x0CO011QyCGcIzxM8hKLijHiU5S8r9lDB KneNe8G6jTLXqsQv1faT1ox2vA2CZme4xa+LCXPjvFhiReq7ACQZYHaJz3h3g94b lsgoZQlV3vvp5US0cY6aB5FvfZoxFL2DYiJ2h+GZTnIeWD9sVLbgwnn79axoOJjF zPQHlSefKgDkHXi7bxgWhiiTtSO1+GxoiW04ysdzQ6JC7kEJYtAiUxgoTvvQSYBY ohCQtI7+07XPYirzZ5T5af2XZg+lSZlWR21S6TNPu6YtFsfkD25SXHstRNXcKNJu 013jTY/XKGoJly2mpVSjp7QV06+65mEfqVv2JiEZkzY+uLkFR4Lrfzz8ReqCvMwd xR/owyE9fW8PUQN/VtAmEo88/Ji6HfvsAlV6tcRzj+gPoVO+bgx77e9Bk7xjT57L Juy6pBAzctlQ0HSCgx2Q =20Ac -END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---
Bug#708877: Non free licence GFDL
Package: freefoam user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious Preface.txt file include a back cover and thus is non free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708878: Still some problem with GFDL with backcover/frontcover
Package: src:gcc-h8300-hms user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious INSTALL/test.html is licenced under GFDL with backcover/frontcover (manually checked). Lintian detect theses files: libstdc++-v3/docs/html/17_intro/porting.texi libstdc++-v3/docs/html/17_intro/porting.html INSTALL/test.html INSTALL/old.html INSTALL/specific.html INSTALL/build.html INSTALL/index.html INSTALL/prerequisites.html INSTALL/binaries.html INSTALL/finalinstall.html INSTALL/gfdl.html INSTALL/configure.html INSTALL/download.html gcc/treelang/treelang.texi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708880: Manual pages have GFDL problem (no invariant)
Package: gengetopt user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious Your package include gfdl with invariant section see gengetopt.info and: doc/gengetopt.html doc/gengetopt.texinfo doc/gengetopt.info Please remove this files, check if upstream could relicense or put to non free package -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 666818 + pending Bug #666818 [mod-wsgi] mod-wsgi: sourceful transition towards Apache 2.4 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 666818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666818 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708298: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#708298: libsnmp30: unversioned file in shared library package
Hi, libsnmp15 package has same file, so its bug is not introduced by me... ;) jokeWhat a relief!/joke On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:42:24 +0200 Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote: net-snmp-config is also used to create SNMPv3 users. This is quite unfortunate but this means it needs to be moved into libsnmp-bin or something like this. Okay, then we'd introduce libsnmp-bin package sounds reasonable for me. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708885: [gnade] GFDL problem with invariant section
Package: gnade user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious Your package gnade include file with gfdl invariant section that are non free: contrib/objects/doc/tutorial/tutorial.sgml doc/build/gnade.sgml Please fix it. bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Fix proposed for the next point release
Processing control commands: severity -1 serious Bug #707793 [smcroute] smcroute: [PATCH] smcroute segfaults on vtun interfaces Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 707793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707793 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708454: api break in libjgoodies-form-java
Package 1.3 breaks its API. FormFactory has been replaced by FormSpecs. A patch has been added to replace FormFactory. -- gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
Bug#707905: mjpeg missing shared lib for capturing video
Control: tags -1 = moreinfo On 2013-05-11 21:27:16, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: Package: mjpegtools Version: 1:2.0.0+debian-2 Severity: serious Tags: unstable patch theres a missing important library in package, libavrec shared libm without it recording tools cant be.. the library was libavrec, and must be separated as another package such libavplay, or libavfile... So if I understand you correctly, liblavrec should be built and shipped in a package? Is this correct? Is anything broken because liblavrec is not shipped? If that's not the case, this sounds like a wishlist bug for me. Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#707905: mjpeg missing shared lib for capturing video
Processing control commands: tags -1 = moreinfo Bug #707905 [mjpegtools] mjpeg missing shared lib for capturing video Added tag(s) moreinfo; removed tag(s) patch. -- 707905: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707905 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708298: libsnmp30: unversioned file in shared library package
On Sun, 19 May 2013 20:32:21 +0900 Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote: On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:42:24 +0200 Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote: net-snmp-config is also used to create SNMPv3 users. This is quite unfortunate but this means it needs to be moved into libsnmp-bin or something like this. Okay, then we'd introduce libsnmp-bin package sounds reasonable for me. Or how about moves to libsnmp-base package? (with /etc/snmp/snmp.conf) Adjusting package dependency maybe necessary but -base sounds suitable for users needs. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706925: marked as done (mediathekview: NoClassDefFoundError: com/jgoodies/forms/factories/FormFactory)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 14:52:02 +0200 with message-id 5198caf2.6050...@gambaru.de and subject line mediathekview: NoClassDefFoundError: com/jgoodies/forms/factories/FormFactory has caused the Debian Bug report #706925, regarding mediathekview: NoClassDefFoundError: com/jgoodies/forms/factories/FormFactory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 706925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706925 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: mediathekview Version: 3.2.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable libjgoodies-forms-java 1.6.0-3 entered unstable today and made mediathekview unusable. More precisely the API changed and mediathekview needs to update the former used FormFactory class to FormSpecs. Hopefully this bug will be fixed in the next 48h. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages mediathekview depends on: ii jarwrapper 0.43 ii libcommons-compress-java 1.4.1-2 ii libcommons-lang3-java 3.1-1 ii libjgoodies-forms-java 1.6.0-3 ii libjide-oss-java 3.5.3+dfsg-1 ii libmac-widgets-java0.9.5+svn369-dfsg1-3 ii libswingx-java 1:1.6.2-1 ii openjdk-6-jre [java6-runtime] 6b27-1.12.5-1 Versions of packages mediathekview recommends: ii flvstreamer 2.1c1-1 ii mplayer2 [mplayer] 2.0-554-gf63dbad-1+b1 mediathekview suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.2.1-2 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#706936: marked as done (libjgoodies-forms-java: missing com.jgoodies.forms.factories.FormFactory)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 14:52:02 +0200 with message-id 5198caf2.6050...@gambaru.de and subject line mediathekview: NoClassDefFoundError: com/jgoodies/forms/factories/FormFactory has caused the Debian Bug report #706925, regarding libjgoodies-forms-java: missing com.jgoodies.forms.factories.FormFactory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 706925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706925 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libjgoodies-forms-java Version: 1.6.0-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, after todays update of libjgoodies-forms-java I started the java program mediathekview (from the Debian package) and got this exception: Exception in thread AWT-EventQueue-0 java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/jgoodies/forms/factories/FormFactory at mediathek.gui.dialog.MVFilmInformation.buildContent(MVFilmInformation.java:102) at mediathek.gui.dialog.MVFilmInformation.init(MVFilmInformation.java:43) at mediathek.MediathekGui.init(MediathekGui.java:147) at mediathek.Main$1.run(Main.java:103) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:251) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:727) at java.awt.EventQueue.access$200(EventQueue.java:103) at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:688) at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:686) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:76) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:697) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:242) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:161) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:150) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:146) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:138) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:91) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.jgoodies.forms.factories.FormFactory at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:423) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:356) ... 18 more and the program hangs. It looks like the cause of this is the missing com.jgoodies.forms.factories.FormFactory class in the library (which has been there in the previous version). Cheers Armin -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.8-trunk-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libjgoodies-forms-java depends on: ii libjgoodies-common-java 1.4.0-2 libjgoodies-forms-java recommends no packages. Versions of packages libjgoodies-forms-java suggests: pn libjgoodies-forms-java-doc none -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.2.1-2 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#708454: marked as done (biomaj: FTBFS: [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/src/org/inria/biomaj/exe/options/BioMAJLogger.java:991: cannot find symbol)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 13:17:48 + with message-id e1ue3ui-0001ar...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708454: fixed in biomaj 1.2.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #708454, regarding biomaj: FTBFS: [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/src/org/inria/biomaj/exe/options/BioMAJLogger.java:991: cannot find symbol to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 708454: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708454 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: biomaj Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130514 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' echo ant -Dant.build.javac.source=1.5 -Dant.build.javac.target=1.5 -f usr/share/biomaj/build.xml Buildfile: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/build.xml test_env: compile: [mkdir] Created dir: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/build/classes [mkdir] Created dir: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/dist [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/build.xml:110: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds [javac] Compiling 137 source files to /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/build/classes [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/src/org/inria/biomaj/exe/options/BioMAJLogger.java:717: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : variable FormFactory [javac] location: class org.inria.biomaj.exe.options.BioMAJLogger [javac] FormFactory.DEFAULT_ROWSPEC, [javac] ^ [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/src/org/inria/biomaj/exe/options/BioMAJLogger.java:718: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : variable FormFactory [javac] location: class org.inria.biomaj.exe.options.BioMAJLogger [javac] FormFactory.LINE_GAP_ROWSPEC, [javac] ^ [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/src/org/inria/biomaj/exe/options/BioMAJLogger.java:719: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : variable FormFactory [javac] location: class org.inria.biomaj.exe.options.BioMAJLogger [javac] FormFactory.DEFAULT_ROWSPEC, [javac] ^ [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/src/org/inria/biomaj/exe/options/BioMAJLogger.java:720: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : variable FormFactory [javac] location: class org.inria.biomaj.exe.options.BioMAJLogger [javac] FormFactory.LINE_GAP_ROWSPEC, [javac] ^ [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/src/org/inria/biomaj/exe/options/BioMAJLogger.java:721: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : variable FormFactory [javac] location: class org.inria.biomaj.exe.options.BioMAJLogger [javac] FormFactory.DEFAULT_ROWSPEC, [javac] ^ [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/src/org/inria/biomaj/exe/options/BioMAJLogger.java:722: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : variable FormFactory [javac] location: class org.inria.biomaj.exe.options.BioMAJLogger [javac] FormFactory.LINE_GAP_ROWSPEC, [javac] ^ [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/share/biomaj/src/org/inria/biomaj/exe/options/BioMAJLogger.java:735: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : variable FormFactory [javac] location: class org.inria.biomaj.exe.options.BioMAJLogger [javac] FormFactory.LABEL_COMPONENT_GAP_COLSPEC, [javac] ^ [javac]
Bug#708840: owl: FTBFS: configure: error: No terminfo found for this system
Control: tag -1 + patch On Sat, 18 May 2013 23:07:03 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: This package FTBFS in a clean sbuild session: configure: error: No terminfo found for this system Adding perl LDFLAGS -fstack-protector -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib/perl/5.14/CORE -lperl -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc -lcrypt checking for /usr/share/terminfo... no checking for /usr/share/lib/terminfo... no make: *** [config.status] Error 1 Adding a build dependency on ncurses-term seems to be enough. Trivial patch attached. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Various Artists: Summerfly diff -u owl-2.2.2/debian/control owl-2.2.2/debian/control --- owl-2.2.2/debian/control +++ owl-2.2.2/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: net Priority: optional Maintainer: Mark W. Eichin eic...@thok.org -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 7), libzephyr-dev (= 3.0~beta), libncurses5-dev, libkrb5-dev, libperl-dev, libssl-dev, libglib2.0-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 7), libzephyr-dev (= 3.0~beta), libncurses5-dev, libkrb5-dev, libperl-dev, libssl-dev, libglib2.0-dev, ncurses-term Standards-Version: 3.8.0 Package: owl diff -u owl-2.2.2/debian/changelog owl-2.2.2/debian/changelog --- owl-2.2.2/debian/changelog +++ owl-2.2.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +owl (2.2.2-1.2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS: configure: error: No terminfo found for this system: +add build dependency on ncurses-term. +(Closes: #708840) + + -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Sun, 19 May 2013 15:16:35 +0200 + owl (2.2.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#708840: owl: FTBFS: configure: error: No terminfo found for this system
Processing control commands: tag -1 + patch Bug #708840 [src:owl] owl: FTBFS: configure: error: No terminfo found for this system Added tag(s) patch. -- 708840: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708840 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708928: regression from 3.20-4: cannot connect to some gateways
Package: openconnect Version: 4.99-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Hello, I'm no longer able to connect to the gateway (which address I can't reveal) with 4.99-2 while it was possible with 3.20-4 shipped in wheezy (downgrading to that version in current sid helps as well). Currently I get: # openconnect -v https://gwaddress.example.com/ Attempting to connect to server xx.xx.xx.xx:443 SSL negotiation with gwaddress.example.com Connected to HTTPS on gwaddress.example.com POST https://gwaddress.example.com/ Failed to read from SSL socket: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received. Error fetching HTTPS response GET https://gwaddress.example.com/ Failed to write to SSL socket: The specified session has been invalidated for some reason. Failed to obtain WebVPN cookie I.e. I even don't get to the phase where I should enter username/password. On the contrary, with 3.20 I get: # openconnect -v https://gwadddress.example.com/ Attempting to connect to xx.xxx.xx.xx:443 SSL negotiation with gwadddress.example.com Matched DNS altname 'gwadddress.example.com' Connected to HTTPS on gwadddress.example.com GET https://gwadddress.example.com/ Got HTTP response: HTTP/1.1 303 See Other Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 0 Location: https://gwadddress.example.com:443/webvpn.html Set-Cookie: webvpncontext=00@webvpn; path=/ Connection: Keep-Alive HTTP body length: (0) GET https://gwadddress.example.com/webvpn.html Got HTTP response: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Cache-Control: max-age=0 Content-Type: text/html Set-Cookie: webvpn=; expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 22:00:00 GMT; path=/ Set-Cookie: webvpncontext=00@webvpn; path=/ X-Transcend-Version: 1 Content-Length: 473 Connection: close HTTP body length: (473) Fixed options give Please enter your username and password. USERNAME: What is more, I tested 5.00 and saw no improvement. P.S. I know this bug is lacking information but I will try to provide something more definitive later. Feel free to ask. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (110, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.8-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=lt_LT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages openconnect depends on: ii libc62.17-3 ii libgnutls26 2.12.23-4 ii liboath0 2.0.2-2 ii libopenconnect2 5.00-0mdx1 ii libproxy00.3.1-6 ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-2 ii libxml2 2.8.0+dfsg1-7+nmu1 ii vpnc-scripts 0.1~git20120602-2 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 openconnect recommends no packages. openconnect suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708298: libsnmp30: unversioned file in shared library package
❦ 19 mai 2013 14:54 CEST, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp : net-snmp-config is also used to create SNMPv3 users. This is quite unfortunate but this means it needs to be moved into libsnmp-bin or something like this. Okay, then we'd introduce libsnmp-bin package sounds reasonable for me. Or how about moves to libsnmp-base package? (with /etc/snmp/snmp.conf) Yes, this seems more sensible than adding a new package. -- Make your program read from top to bottom. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan Plauger) pgp6zZcQeBm7e.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 686340 + pending
Bug #686340 [src:cssutils] cssutils: FTBFS with Python 3.3: AssertionError:
Tuples differ: (None, None) != ('text/html', 'ascii')
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
686340: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686340
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Bug#708831: upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 708831 apt Bug #708831 [upgrade-reports] upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install) Bug reassigned from package 'upgrade-reports' to 'apt'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #708831 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #708831 to the same values previously set retitle 708831 apt: packages unpacked in the wrong order Bug #708831 [apt] upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install) Changed Bug title to 'apt: packages unpacked in the wrong order' from 'upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708831: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708831 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708928: regression from 3.20-4: cannot connect to some gateways
Hello, Sekmadienis 19 Gegužė 2013 16:01:24 Modestas Vainius rašė: I'm no longer able to connect to the gateway (which address I can't reveal) with 4.99-2 while it was possible with 3.20-4 shipped in wheezy (downgrading to that version in current sid helps as well). Currently I get: # openconnect -v https://gwaddress.example.com/ Attempting to connect to server xx.xx.xx.xx:443 SSL negotiation with gwaddress.example.com Connected to HTTPS on gwaddress.example.com POST https://gwaddress.example.com/ Failed to read from SSL socket: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received. Error fetching HTTPS response GET https://gwaddress.example.com/ Failed to write to SSL socket: The specified session has been invalidated for some reason. Failed to obtain WebVPN cookie I.e. I even don't get to the phase where I should enter username/password. more info: I have built 5.00 against OpenSSL. That didn't help either: # openconnect --no-cert-check -v https://gwaddress.example.com/ Attempting to connect to server xx.xx.xx.xx:443 SSL negotiation with gwaddress.example.com Matched DNS altname 'gwaddress.example.com' Connected to HTTPS on gwaddress.example.com POST https://gwaddress.example.com/ Failed to read from SSL socket Error fetching HTTPS response GET https://gwaddress.example.com/ Failed to read from SSL socket Error fetching HTTPS response Failed to obtain WebVPN cookie So it seems to be a bug in the codebase rather than GnuTLS issue. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#708928: regression from 3.20-4: cannot connect to some gateways
Control: severity -1 important On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Modestas Vainius wrote: I'm no longer able to connect to the gateway (which address I can't reveal) with 4.99-2 while it was possible with 3.20-4 shipped in wheezy [...] What is more, I tested 5.00 and saw no improvement. Hi, thanks for your detailed report and logs. Can you try 4.07 [1] or other 4.x versions to help narrow this down? Make sure you keep the openconnect and libopenconnect2 packages in sync as you are testing. I only mention because I see ii libopenconnect2 5.00-0mdx1 in your package list. [1] http://snapshot.debian.org/package/openconnect/4.07-1/ -- mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#708928: regression from 3.20-4: cannot connect to some gateways
Processing control commands: severity -1 important Bug #708928 [openconnect] regression from 3.20-4: cannot connect to some gateways Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 708928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708298: marked as done (libsnmp30: unversioned file in shared library package)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 15:04:53 +
with message-id e1ue5al-00065x...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#708298: fixed in net-snmp 5.7.2~dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #708298,
regarding libsnmp30: unversioned file in shared library package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
708298: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708298
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libsnmp30
Version: 5.7.2~dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.2
libsnmp30 ships this file:
/usr/bin/net-snmp-config
This is serious violation of Policy §8.2:
If your package contains files whose names do not change with each
change in the library shared object version, you must not put them in
the shared library package.
I think this file should be moved into libsnmp-dev.
--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: net-snmp
Source-Version: 5.7.2~dfsg-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
net-snmp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 708...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.org (supplier of updated net-snmp package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 23:09:52 +0900
Source: net-snmp
Binary: snmpd snmp libsnmp-base libsnmp30 libsnmp30-dbg libsnmp-dev
libsnmp-perl python-netsnmp tkmib
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 5.7.2~dfsg-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Net-SNMP Packaging Team pkg-net-snmp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.org
Description:
libsnmp-base - SNMP configuration script, MIBs and documentation
libsnmp-dev - SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) development files
libsnmp-perl - SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) Perl5 support
libsnmp30 - SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) library
libsnmp30-dbg - SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) library debug
python-netsnmp - SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) Python support
snmp - SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) applications
snmpd - SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) agents
tkmib - SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) MIB browser
Closes: 708298 708519
Changes:
net-snmp (5.7.2~dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/control
- fix typo and improve description, thanks to Martin Eberhard Schauer
martin.e.scha...@gmx.de for the patch (Closes: #708519)
- libsnmp-base: add Conflicts: libsnmp30 ( 5.7.2~dfsg-5) since
net-snmp-config file moves from libsnmp30 to libsnmp-base
(Closes: #708298)
- update descriptions
* debian/{libsnmp-base,libsnmp30}.install: update
Checksums-Sha1:
175822cf500e30973d6148fbd97c417f29c1b062 2898 net-snmp_5.7.2~dfsg-5.dsc
d6f48d6c4704642143ce3f2b15adb02e76df9066 56289
net-snmp_5.7.2~dfsg-5.debian.tar.gz
e41a7a2c011c4cd6b0bf7dda9f77eb7a5d392d6e 78766 snmpd_5.7.2~dfsg-5_amd64.deb
e3f9b00b40a44e7dbcb0b55d34a0b5887f3a8355 175604 snmp_5.7.2~dfsg-5_amd64.deb
067a6d6df7d373fe55086c951de8ea2763a37b16 1563112
libsnmp-base_5.7.2~dfsg-5_all.deb
5c8ad2d5d85208f106575c0f97dc1fb2d677bb53 2693030
libsnmp30_5.7.2~dfsg-5_amd64.deb
33cb652be696399cd5df998ea371d8c6f109a127 2875064
libsnmp30-dbg_5.7.2~dfsg-5_amd64.deb
2a6d9e1a09e240801cd255074b8d94167256ad78 1960902
libsnmp-dev_5.7.2~dfsg-5_amd64.deb
f88adba48b5ab1ade2febd914c11c820a66963c9 1488084
libsnmp-perl_5.7.2~dfsg-5_amd64.deb
b059308f0d16c3f0c95eb8ccf12026aac9411625 23018
python-netsnmp_5.7.2~dfsg-5_amd64.deb
29cad4a6dd8a8f9af26c220a629c39fac2db7bc6 1432022 tkmib_5.7.2~dfsg-5_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
abce91f6f3c9f9bf18481a655ac61500fe7f0aa1707447a465d1450b21cd6df8 2898
net-snmp_5.7.2~dfsg-5.dsc
a4030d7d083f8c527554611c655c76b09b0eadec6322b2312dd69ea1143c86e5 56289
net-snmp_5.7.2~dfsg-5.debian.tar.gz
b1ae7b97217c313d1645ca055481a9adb620fa77f2d912dc206c608d4df0a8e4 78766
snmpd_5.7.2~dfsg-5_amd64.deb
d40e087cd54cd475f6db11098f2690c621dd038b78ae6f1c430d01d25e8bea2e 175604
snmp_5.7.2~dfsg-5_amd64.deb
Bug#708942: [gprbuild] GFDL non free file with front cover
Package: gprbuild user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious The files have front cover and thus non free: doc/gprbuild_ug.texi doc/html/gprbuild_ug.html doc/info/gprbuild_ug.info doc/txt/gprbuild_ug.txt Thanks Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708946: GFDL documentation with front and back cover
Package: src:grub Severity: serious user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant Grub documentation doc/grub.texi is not free. Please free grub. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708831: upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)
Hi, The dpkg/status file before the upgrade could be helpful for reproducing. You can (hopefully) find it in /var/backup/ Helpful config options (I case someone wants to try) -o dir::state::status=./dpkg/status -o debug::pkgdpkgpm=true # displays dpkg calls rather than executing them -o debug::pkgorderlist=true # first stage order choices -o debug::pkgpackagemanager=true # second (and final) stage order choices On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote: /usr/bin/python: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) /usr/bin/python: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.16' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 While APT usually avoids it, its actually fine to have dependencies not satisfied for half-installed packages and prerm scripts do only give you the guarantee that your dependencies will be at least half-installed. In the case of debconf, we don't even have a dependency on python, so its even more fine to choose this order for unpack. I haven't had the time yet to debug why APT is choosing this route (and as said, dpkg/status file would help), but while this might not be ideal its not a bug in APT. This smells more like a bug in dh_python2 which adds this prerm code which assumes that pyclean can be executed even if it isn't configured (aka that it behaves like an essential application), but I am not in the mood for bug-ping-pong so just CC'ed python maintainers for now, so they can have a look and comment on it while we will see whats up with APT to decide on this route (did I mention that a dpkg/status file would help? ;) ). Best regards David Kalnischkies -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708947: [horae] GFDL problem
Package: horae Severity: serious The following file include GFDL with invariant section: examples/artemis/EuTiO3/eutio3-atoms.inp examples/artemis/AgBrCl/AgBr.inp Please remove, get autorisation from upstream to relicense. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708341: marked as done (libglide3: fails to install: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 15:33:03 + with message-id e1ue5bb-00021t...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708341: fixed in glide 2002.04.10ds1-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #708341, regarding libglide3: fails to install: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 708341: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708341 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libglide3 Version: 2002.04.10ds1-8 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus the severity. From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Selecting previously unselected package libglide3. (Reading database ... 7002 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libglide3 (from .../libglide3_2002.04.10ds1-8_amd64.deb) ... Setting up libglide3 (2002.04.10ds1-8) ... dpkg: error processing libglide3 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 Errors were encountered while processing: libglide3 This sounds a little bit like debconf and DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive ... probably needing some db_foo bar || true cheers, Andreas libglide3_2002.04.10ds1-8.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: glide Source-Version: 2002.04.10ds1-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glide, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 708...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org (supplier of updated glide package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 16:50:38 +0200 Source: glide Binary: glide2-bin libglide2 libglide2-dev libglide3 libglide3-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 2002.04.10ds1-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Description: glide2-bin - graphics library for 3Dfx Voodoo based cards - support programs libglide2 - graphics library for 3Dfx Voodoo based cards - shared libraries libglide2-dev - graphics library for 3Dfx Voodoo based cards - development files libglide3 - graphics library for 3Dfx Voodoo based cards - shared libraries libglide3-dev - graphics library for 3Dfx Voodoo based cards - development files Closes: 708341 708440 708736 708875 708896 Changes: glide (2002.04.10ds1-9) unstable; urgency=low . * Remove package creation and maintainers history from debian/copyright. * Ignore error from db_unregister in case the template does not exist. (Closes: #708341) * Remove useless debian/BUGS file, these are tracked in the BTS. * Pass CPPFLAGS, CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to upstream build system. * Fix format string errors. * Use dpkg-buildflags to set CPPFLAGS, CFLAGS and LDFLAGS. * Use debhelper compatibility level 9. * Debconf template translations: - Update Danish (Joe Dalton). (Closes: #708896) - Update Galician (Jorge Barreiro). (Closes: #708875) - Update Portuguese (Américo Monteiro). (Closes: #708736) - Update Russian (Sergey Alyoshin). (Closes: #708440) Checksums-Sha1: 7a7cc6541f1367c20536d8f78facec25e9f830d5 1548 glide_2002.04.10ds1-9.dsc cf02e5c6072293e81e195e8511639255b860284a 107093 glide_2002.04.10ds1-9.debian.tar.gz 0357f3eb013a76e62c7996aee8d6b83d537accb0 1468164 glide2-bin_2002.04.10ds1-9_i386.deb a1833e79d347c89e7d473b0f824c39d2b9b560ed 396310 libglide2_2002.04.10ds1-9_i386.deb ac628b2934c7354c644b64409b3438ab5f4ff4ab 32434 libglide2-dev_2002.04.10ds1-9_i386.deb 4a252feab82891bb42873e097f1cd3645f594a36 372546 libglide3_2002.04.10ds1-9_i386.deb c7632efdc7dfa94ffee72c976ac98a2085f24fba 30742 libglide3-dev_2002.04.10ds1-9_i386.deb Checksums-Sha256: 62153fe0658c77f760ded9beb90d53ac34354b7a6ca42bc1cdc72ff8944368ad 1548
Bug#708831: upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 05:15:35PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: Hi, The dpkg/status file before the upgrade could be helpful for reproducing. You can (hopefully) find it in /var/backup/ Helpful config options (I case someone wants to try) -o dir::state::status=./dpkg/status -o debug::pkgdpkgpm=true # displays dpkg calls rather than executing them -o debug::pkgorderlist=true # first stage order choices -o debug::pkgpackagemanager=true # second (and final) stage order choices On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote: /usr/bin/python: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) /usr/bin/python: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.16' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 While APT usually avoids it, its actually fine to have dependencies not satisfied for half-installed packages and prerm scripts do only give you the guarantee that your dependencies will be at least half-installed. In the case of debconf, we don't even have a dependency on python, so its even more fine to choose this order for unpack. I don't think that debconf is relevant there. The problem is that the new python needs a new libc6 package, and thus if it is unpacked before libc6, it doesn't work anymore. This means that every python script on the system will fail (being called from a maintainer script or not), until the dependency is satisfied again. I haven't had the time yet to debug why APT is choosing this route (and as said, dpkg/status file would help), but while this might not be ideal its not a bug in APT. I really thought if a package A depends on package B, B has to be unpacked before A is unpacked. Otherwise it means that for example if the package dash starts to depend on a new libc6 version, while it is unpacked before this new version, all maintainer scripts written in shell will fail. This smells more like a bug in dh_python2 which adds this prerm code which assumes that pyclean can be executed even if it isn't configured (aka that it behaves like an essential application), but I am not in the mood for bug-ping-pong so just CC'ed python maintainers for now, so they can have a look and comment on it while we will see whats up with APT to decide on this route (did I mention that a dpkg/status file would help? ;) ). The problem there is that /usr/bin/python exists is not a dead symlink. Just that it fails to be executed. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 708589
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 708589 + confirmed Bug #708589 [src:fwknop] fwknop: FTBFS: raising the section level of @appendixsubsec which is too low Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708589 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557916: marked as done (poker-network: uses pythonX.Y/site-packages for Python = 2.6)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:03:12 +
with message-id e1ue64m-0007ks...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#708871: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #557916,
regarding poker-network: uses pythonX.Y/site-packages for Python = 2.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
557916: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557916
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: poker-network
Version: 1.7.5-1.1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python2.6 dist-packages
Hello,
When rebuilt against python-all{,-dev,-dbg} (and thus python2.6) from
Debian experimental, your binary packages contained these files:
[python-poker-prizes_1.7.5-1.1_all.deb]
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pokerprizes/prizes.py
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pokerprizes/__init__.py
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pokerprizes/tourneyselectinfo.py
This is an indication of a broken package: Python = 2.6 does not
look for modules into /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages/ anymore, but
uses /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/dist-packages/ instead.
How to fix it?
==
* if your package is using python-central:
- add XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions} to all binary packages
that ship Python modules (.py files) or extensions (.so, including
_d.so) in debian/control, check if it's enough,
- try to convert to python-support[1], check if it's enough,
* add --install-layout=deb to setup.py call and bump minimum required
python{,-all,all-dev} build dependency to 2.5.4-1~, check if it's enough
* ask for help on #debian-python or debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/central2support
--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 1.7.7-3.2+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package poker-network has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708871
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#629145: marked as done (poker-network: won't build modules for Python 2.7)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:03:12 + with message-id e1ue64m-0007ks...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708871: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #629145, regarding poker-network: won't build modules for Python 2.7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 629145: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629145 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: poker-network Version: 1.7.7-3.2 Severity: important User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python2.7 I rebuilt poker-network against python-defaults 2.7.2-1 (currently in experimental). The resulting binary package python-poker2d contained only extension modules for Python 2.6 (rather than, as I would expect, 2.7): $ dpkg -c python-poker2d_1.7.7-3.2_i386.deb | grep -- -packages/$ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2011-06-03 22:49 ./usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ It looks like upstream's Python interpreter detection code is broken. (Please note that simply choosing lowest/heighest version from among all available ones is not a valid strategy for Debian!) Normally for packages using autoconf you can use PYTHON environment variable to override the (usually broken) detection system, e.g. by putting export PYTHON = $(shell pyversions -d) to debian/rules. But, for some reason, it doesn't work for poker-network: [...] | checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes | checking for inline... inline | checking whether python2.7 version =2.3... configure: error: too old -- Jakub Wilk ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.7.7-3.2+rm Dear submitter, as the package poker-network has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708871 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#669465: marked as done (poker-network: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: python-poker-engine (= 1.3.4))
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:03:12 + with message-id e1ue64m-0007ks...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708871: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #669465, regarding poker-network: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: python-poker-engine (= 1.3.4) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 669465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669465 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: poker-network Version: 1.7.7-3.2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: ┌──┐ │ Install poker-network build dependencies (apt-based resolver) │ └──┘ Installing build dependencies Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: sbuild-build-depends-poker-network-dummy : Depends: python-poker-engine (= 1.3.4) but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. apt-get failed. The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/04/19/poker-network_1.7.7-3.2_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.7.7-3.2+rm Dear submitter, as the package poker-network has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708871 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#673563: marked as done (twistd crashed with TypeError in __init__(): 'reconnect' is an invalid keyword argument for this function)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:03:12 + with message-id e1ue64m-0007ks...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708871: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #673563, regarding twistd crashed with TypeError in __init__(): 'reconnect' is an invalid keyword argument for this function to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 673563: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673563 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: python-poker-network Version: 1.7.7-3.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: patch -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.3.2-trinity (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages python-poker-network depends on: ii adduser 3.113+nmu1 ii apg 2.2.3.dfsg.1-2 ii dbconfig-common 1.8.47+nmu1 ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.5.41 ii libjson-perl 2.53-1 ii mysql-client 5.5.23-2 ii mysql-client-5.5 [mysql-client] 5.5.23-2 ii python 2.7.2-10 ii python-central 0.6.17 ii python-memcache 1.48-1 ii python-mysqldb 1.2.3-1 ii python-openssl 0.13-1 ii python-poker-engine 1.3.6-1.1 ii python-simplejson2.3.2-1 ii python-soappy0.12.0-4 ii python-twisted 12.0.0-1 ii python2.62.6.7-4 ii rsync3.0.9-1 ii ucf 3.0025+nmu2 python-poker-network recommends no packages. Versions of packages python-poker-network suggests: ii munin-nodenone ii mysql-server 5.5.23-2 Versions of packages python-poker-network suggests: ii munin-nodenone ii mysql-server 5.5.23-2 -- Configuration Files: /etc/default/python-poker-network changed [not included] -- debconf information excluded -- debsums errors found: debsums: changed file /usr/share/pyshared/pokernetwork/pokerdatabase.py (from python-poker-network package) This bug is the same as launchpad #839256 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poker-network/+bug/839256 I can confirm that the workaround suggested by Jeff Downton works: Was able to get past this error by removing reconnect = 1 from the list of MySQLdb.connect params on lines 63 and 123 of file /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pokernetwork/pokerdatabase.py I assume the version of MySQLdb packaged in this distribution is different from the one originally used with this python package. Regards! -- ~~~ Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com ~~~ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.7.7-3.2+rm Dear submitter, as the package poker-network has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708871 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#684175: marked as done (pokernetwork: calls addgroup without --system)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:03:12 + with message-id e1ue64m-0007ks...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708871: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #684175, regarding pokernetwork: calls addgroup without --system to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 684175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684175 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: pokernetwork Version: 1.7.7-3.2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): 1m23.3s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system: /var/lib/pokernetwork/ not owned But while checking the maintainer scripts I found a more serious problem in the chroot: the pokernetwork user had GID=1000 because addgroup is called without --system http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.2 Back to the first problem I noticed: since you are calling adduser with --no-create-home and create the home directory yourself, you should also properly clean it up during purge. (And no, that's not an advice to drop --no-create-home.) cheers, Andreas python-poker-network_1.7.7-3.2.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.7.7-3.2+rm Dear submitter, as the package poker-network has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708871 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#698533: marked as done (poker-web: modifies a shipped file: /usr/share/poker-web/currency_one.php)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:03:12 + with message-id e1ue64m-0007ks...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708871: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #698533, regarding poker-web: modifies a shipped file: /usr/share/poker-web/currency_one.php to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 698533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698533 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: poker-web Version: 1.7.7-3.2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Control: found -1 wheezy/None Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies a shipped file, that could be a config file that is not in /etc. These modifications will be overwritten without questioning at the next upgrade. Modifying conffiles is forbidden by the policy, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files 10.7.3: [...] The easy way to achieve this behavior is to make the configuration file a conffile. [...] This implies that the default version will be part of the package distribution, and must not be modified by the maintainer scripts during installation (or at any other time). Note that once a package ships a modified version of that conffile, dpkg will prompt the user for an action how to handle the upgrade of this modified conffile (that was not modified by the user). Further in 10.7.3: [...] must not ask unnecessary questions (particularly during upgrades) [...] If a configuration file is customized by a maintainer script after having asked some debconf questions, it may not be marked as a conffile. Instead a template could be installed in /usr/share and used by the postinst script to fill in the custom values and create (or update) the configuration file (preserving any user modifications!). This file must be removed during postrm purge. ucf(1) may help with these tasks. See also http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling In https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/09/msg00412.html and followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with severity serious. debsums reports modification of the following files, from the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): /usr/share/poker-web/currency_one.php cheers, poker-web_None.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.7.7-3.2+rm Dear submitter, as the package poker-network has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708871 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#708589: fwknop: FTBFS: raising the section level of @appendixsubsec which is too low
Patch enclosed to fix the issue. index 83669ca..e8d15da 100644 --- a/doc/gpl-2.0.texi +++ b/doc/gpl-2.0.texi @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. @end display -@appendixsubsec Preamble +@appendixsec Preamble The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all. modification follow. @iftex -@appendixsubsec TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION +@appendixsec TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION @end iftex @ifinfo @center GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. @end ifinfo @page -@appendixsubsec Appendix: How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs +@appendixsec Appendix: How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it
Bug#689252: marked as done (drupal6-trans-ru: installs files in /usr/share/drupal6/profiles which is a symlink in the drupal package)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:14:18 + with message-id e1ue6fw-0001km...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #689252, regarding drupal6-trans-ru: installs files in /usr/share/drupal6/profiles which is a symlink in the drupal package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 689252: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689252 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: drupal6-trans-ru Version: 1.3-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships files in a directory that is a symlink in another package. This may cause unwanted relocation of files and has the potential for creating big trouble later on. See e.g. the issues that symlinked doc directories in /usr/share/doc are are causing during upgrades ... http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze2wheezy/unknown_failures.html Note that dpkg does not replace directories with symlinks and vice versa - this is intentional - and the first one that gets created wins :-) So it will depend on the unpack order whether a directory or link is created. I'm filing this as serious since I see trouble arising out of this for future upgrades ... The drupal package should include a packaging guide for extensions and translations. If this is missing, please file a bug there to avoid further confusion in other translation packagings. From the attached logfile: 0m51.9s INFO: dirname part contains a symlink: /usr/share/drupal6/profiles/default != /etc/drupal/6/profiles/default (drupal6-trans-ru) /usr/share/drupal6/profiles/default/translations != /etc/drupal/6/profiles/default/translations (drupal6-trans-ru) /usr/share/drupal6/profiles/default/translations/ru.po != /etc/drupal/6/profiles/default/translations/ru.po (drupal6-trans-ru) I don't think a .po file is intended to end up in /etc Cheers, Andreas PS: the debsums errors in the logfile are caused by debsums bug #689202 drupal6-trans-ru_1.3-2.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.3-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package drupal6-trans-ru has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708920 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#708831: upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)
reassign 708831 python retitle 708831 dh_python should not assume that pyclean works thanks On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 05:34:31PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 05:15:35PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: Hi, The dpkg/status file before the upgrade could be helpful for reproducing. You can (hopefully) find it in /var/backup/ Helpful config options (I case someone wants to try) -o dir::state::status=./dpkg/status -o debug::pkgdpkgpm=true # displays dpkg calls rather than executing them -o debug::pkgorderlist=true # first stage order choices -o debug::pkgpackagemanager=true # second (and final) stage order choices On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote: /usr/bin/python: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) /usr/bin/python: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.16' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 While APT usually avoids it, its actually fine to have dependencies not satisfied for half-installed packages and prerm scripts do only give you the guarantee that your dependencies will be at least half-installed. In the case of debconf, we don't even have a dependency on python, so its even more fine to choose this order for unpack. I don't think that debconf is relevant there. The problem is that the new python needs a new libc6 package, and thus if it is unpacked before libc6, it doesn't work anymore. This means that every python script on the system will fail (being called from a maintainer script or not), until the dependency is satisfied again. I haven't had the time yet to debug why APT is choosing this route (and as said, dpkg/status file would help), but while this might not be ideal its not a bug in APT. I really thought if a package A depends on package B, B has to be unpacked before A is unpacked. Otherwise it means that for example if the package dash starts to depend on a new libc6 version, while it is unpacked before this new version, all maintainer scripts written in shell will fail. So it seems that packages from the essential set have a pre-depends exactly for that. This means the bug is in dh_python, which should not assume that pyclean works, even if the script exists. Reassigning. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: patch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 708797 grave Bug #708797 [getmail4] getmail4: Connecting to a server results in NameError: global name 'socket' is not defined Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708797: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708797 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#707444: marked as done (shaperd: FTBFS: libipq.h:33:43: fatal error: linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_queue.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:27:11 + with message-id e1ue6rz-0002q1...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708220: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #707444, regarding shaperd: FTBFS: libipq.h:33:43: fatal error: linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_queue.h: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 707444: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707444 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: shaperd Version: 0.2.1-5.2 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: g++ -Wall -O2 -I/usr/src/linux/include -I/usr/include/libipq -DWITH_IPQ -c classifier.cpp In file included from packet.hpp:10:0, from classifier.hpp:4, from classifier.cpp:3: /usr/include/libipq.h:33:43: fatal error: linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_queue.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[1]: *** [classifier.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2013/05/09/shaperd_0.2.1-5.2_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.2.1-5.2+rm Dear submitter, as the package shaperd has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708220 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#672181: marked as done (itrans: uninstallable in sid)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:31:49 + with message-id e1ue6wt-0003nj...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708819: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #672181, regarding itrans: uninstallable in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 672181: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672181 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: itrans Version: 5.3-10 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer installable in sid: * tex-common breaks itrans (= 5.3-10) It was already removed from testing: http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/itrans/news/20120505T163910Z.html Cheers, Andreas ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 5.3-10+rm Dear submitter, as the package itrans has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708819 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Bug#707686: marked as done (dhelp: FTBFS and uninstallable in sid: needs ruby-gettext)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:33:03 +
with message-id e1ue6xf-0003rk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#707686: fixed in dhelp 0.6.21+nmu2
has caused the Debian Bug report #707686,
regarding dhelp: FTBFS and uninstallable in sid: needs ruby-gettext
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
707686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707686
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: dhelp
Version: 0.6.21+nmu1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As predicted in #699261, dhelp now fails to build and install in sid,
since libgettext-ruby1.8 is gone.
The build and runtime dependency needs to be adjusted to
ruby-gettext. Patch attached.
Cheers,
gregor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=9Xtz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru dhelp-0.6.21+nmu1/debian/changelog dhelp-0.6.21+nmu2/debian/changelog
--- dhelp-0.6.21+nmu1/debian/changelog 2012-07-02 19:19:30.0 +0200
+++ dhelp-0.6.21+nmu2/debian/changelog 2013-05-10 11:45:59.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+dhelp (0.6.21+nmu2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Change build and runtime dependency from libgettext-ruby1.8 to
+ruby-gettext. Closes: #nn
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Fri, 10 May 2013 11:45:16 +0200
+
dhelp (0.6.21+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-Maintainer Upload
diff -Nru dhelp-0.6.21+nmu1/debian/control dhelp-0.6.21+nmu2/debian/control
--- dhelp-0.6.21+nmu1/debian/control 2012-07-02 19:13:32.0 +0200
+++ dhelp-0.6.21+nmu2/debian/control 2013-05-10 11:46:54.0 +0200
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) ra...@linuxia.de,
Standards-Version: 3.9.3
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), cdbs (= 0.4.23-1.1),
- libgettext-ruby1.8 | libgettext-ruby-util
+ ruby-gettext
Package: dhelp
Depends: perl-modules, libtemplate-perl, libhtml-parser-perl,
liburi-perl, liblocale-gettext-perl, libdata-page-perl, ruby1.8,
- ruby-bdb | libdb-ruby1.8, ruby-debian, libgettext-ruby1.8, doc-base,
+ ruby-bdb | libdb-ruby1.8, ruby-debian, ruby-gettext, doc-base,
swish++, pstotext, poppler-utils, ucf (= 0.8), ${misc:Depends}
Recommends: www-browser | html2text
Suggests: httpd-cgi, info2www, man2html, catdvi
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: dhelp
Source-Version: 0.6.21+nmu2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dhelp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 707...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated dhelp package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 17:58:05 +0200
Source: dhelp
Binary: dhelp
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6.21+nmu2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Georgios M. Zarkadas g...@member.fsf.org
Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org
Description:
dhelp - online help system
Closes: 707686
Changes:
dhelp (0.6.21+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Change build and runtime dependency from libgettext-ruby1.8 to
ruby-gettext. Closes: #707686
Checksums-Sha1:
26ff9d0fbf2df955ca4a02e20d359325a511812a 1540 dhelp_0.6.21+nmu2.dsc
Processed: tagging 708950
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 708950 + confirmed Bug #708950 [request-tracker4] request-tracker4: fails to build (failing test suite) Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708950: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708950 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692753: marked as done (Balazar dies soon with Error: class 'soya.GLError'(GL_INVALID_OPERATION))
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:35:29 + with message-id e1ue6a1-0004k1...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708926: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #692753, regarding Balazar dies soon with Error: class 'soya.GLError'(GL_INVALID_OPERATION) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 692753: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692753 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: balazar Version: 0.3.4.ds1-6.1 Severity: grave Hi, I just installed balazar to try it out. After a few seconds in the game (around 30s?) the game crashes. The graphic window shows an error message: Error: class 'soya.GLError'(GL_INVALID_OPERATION). The console from whihc I started the game shows: thibaut@b-wing:~/Documents/CND/2011/data/10mayosir$ balazar * Balazar * Balazar lives in /usr/share/games * Soya * Using Software Surface. * Soya * Using 8 bits stencil buffer * Soya * OpenGL initialization [OK] * Soya * version 0.15rc1 * Using OpenGL 3.3.0 NVIDIA 304.48 * - renderer : GeForce 320M/integrated/SSE2 * - vendor : NVIDIA Corporation * - maximum number of lights: 8 * - maximum number of clip planes : 8 * - maximum number of texture units : 4 * - maximum texture size: 8192 pixels * Using OpenAL 1.1 ALSOFT 1.14 * - renderer : OpenAL Soft * - vendor: OpenAL Community * Soya * Using Software Surface. * Soya * Using 16 bits stencil buffer * Soya * OpenGL initialization [OK] * Tofu * Creating new player thibaut... * Balazar * Creating level 0, 0... * Tofu * Level level_0_0 38667584 activated ! * Tofu * Player thibaut login ! GL_INVALID_OPERATION Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/games/balazar/gui.py, line 216, in play_solo r = balazar.game_interface.start_single(globdef.NAME, test) File /usr/share/games/balazar/game_interface.py, line 110, in start_single r = tofu.single.serve_forever(login = login, password = password) File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/tofu/single.py, line 75, in serve_forever return tofu.IDLER.idle() File main_loop.pyx, line 125, in _soya.MainLoop.idle File main_loop.pyx, line 185, in _soya.MainLoop.main_loop File main_loop.pyx, line 281, in _soya.MainLoop.render File renderer.pyx, line 434, in _soya.render File renderer.pyx, line 410, in _soya.check_gl_error _soya.GLError: GL_INVALID_OPERATION Regards, Thibaut. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages balazar depends on: ii python 2.7.3~rc2-1 ii python-cerealizer 0.7-4 ii python-pyvorbis1.5-1 ii python-soya0.15~rc1-8 ii python-support 1.0.15 ii python-tofu0.5-5 balazar recommends no packages. Versions of packages balazar suggests: pn python-psyco none -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.3.4.ds1-6.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package balazar has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708926 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Processed: Re: Bug#708572: libdbd-anydata-perl: incompatible with newer DBI versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 708572 grave Bug #708572 [libdbd-anydata-perl] libdbd-anydata-perl: incompatible with newer DBI versions Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' tag 708572 sid Bug #708572 [libdbd-anydata-perl] libdbd-anydata-perl: incompatible with newer DBI versions Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #708572 to the same tags previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708572 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696343: marked as done ([drupal6] SA-CORE-2012-004 - Drupal core - Multiple vulnerabilities in Drupal 6 7)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:37:33 + with message-id e1ue6c1-0005ng...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708746: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #696343, regarding [drupal6] SA-CORE-2012-004 - Drupal core - Multiple vulnerabilities in Drupal 6 7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 696343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696343 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: drupal6 Severity: critical Tags: security X-Debbugs-CC: secure-testing-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi! There's a security update for Drupal6 and Drupal7 available: http://drupal.org/SA-CORE-2012-004 Multiple vulnerabilities were fixed in the supported Drupal core versions 6 and 7. Access bypass (User module search - Drupal 6 and 7) A vulnerability was identified that allows blocked users to appear in user search results, even when the search results are viewed by unprivileged users. This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that the default Drupal core user search results only display usernames (and disclosure of usernames is not considered a security vulnerability). However, since modules or themes may override the search results to display more information from each user's profile, this could result in additional information about blocked users being disclosed on some sites. CVE: Requested. Access bypass (Upload module - Drupal 6) A vulnerability was identified that allows information about uploaded files to be displayed in RSS feeds and search results to users that do not have the view uploaded files permission. This issue affects Drupal 6 only. CVE: Requested. Arbitrary PHP code execution (File upload modules - Drupal 6 and 7) Drupal core's file upload feature blocks the upload of many files that can be executed on the server by munging the filename. A malicious user could name a file in a manner that bypasses this munging of the filename in Drupal's input validation. This vulnerability is mitigated by several factors: The attacker would need the permission to upload a file to the server. Certain combinations of PHP and filesystems are not vulnerable to this issue, though we did not perform an exhaustive review of the supported PHP versions. Finally: the server would need to allow execution of files in the uploads directory. Drupal core has protected against this with a .htaccess file protection in place from SA-2006-006 - Drupal Core - Execution of arbitrary files in certain Apache configurations. Users of IIS should consider updating their web.config. Users of Nginx should confirm that only the index.php and other known good scripts are executable. Users of other webservers should review their configuration to ensure the goals are achieved in some other way. CVE: Requested. CVE identifier(s) issued A CVE identifier will be requested, and added upon issuance, in accordance with Drupal Security Team processes. Versions affected Drupal core 6.x versions prior to 6.27. Drupal core 7.x versions prior to 7.18. Solution Install the latest version: If you use Drupal 6.x, upgrade to Drupal core 6.27. If you use Drupal 7.x, upgrade to Drupal core 7.18. --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 Debian Release: 7.0 500 unstablewww.deb-multimedia.org 500 unstableftp.de.debian.org 1 experimentalftp.de.debian.org --- Package information. --- Package's Depends field is empty. Package's Recommends field is empty. Package's Suggests field is empty. -- Ciao...// Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ http://blog.windfluechter.net Please don't share this address with Facebook or Google! gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij_public_key.asc ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6.26-1.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package drupal6 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708746 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander
Bug#698333: marked as done (drupal6: SA-CORE-2013-001 - Drupal core - Multiple vulnerabilities)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 16:37:33 + with message-id e1ue6c1-0005ng...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708746: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #698333, regarding drupal6: SA-CORE-2013-001 - Drupal core - Multiple vulnerabilities to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 698333: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698333 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: drupal6 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi There are security updates for drupal6 and 7 available. CVE numbers will be requested according to the advisory. The first issue mentions is said to also affect various core modules. [1] http://drupal.org/SA-CORE-2013-001 Regards, Salvatore -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQ95wXAAoJEHidbwV/2GP+zbEQAMomeWx5vKT7o/6uOdkRSz9j PL+oJXozaqeaPTXUBt+NSBcHJMKO2Y5AwDsWJCqriGF5bvRkGXQGI9VHmTJiD2VD X5nOxV7bvxjH6iGu5oR2fGCJwsZHYFf2nQEeXPjzHo4w3BpHjgpf0U9AInv9OSYH dKrRn7t1v3mUxbEBnmWGqH9UA6kPFafocoFZoa6s9pP1M1seaRee/OoLXF1waOm6 kxFhh6dFSZkaaHVumBpsZwyoDK07zJEdfV3Qud5ioaOi9I3zVNC/yHY0RNBfS6YZ N73lqgZ4yFata/e2D1H371AP5L0z+ekJ93hHrhQ4GX3SCd1kpfTuGd5UzS4C+WcI 8tQ0pRT0MgFCD2ElsYdBUB1GwishCp2pBREiXNMdDVmJuCQ8WsG3Oyi4OMVVKLiU 4bXF4gepCaFdQeODnWfkvRnlI1JWZFj2PjL0t7fC3u9iDksF51VraGV5VaWLqcTx 0AzR1sjW6sSEAFea3L5D8K0gFpfjUERFMFK5j4QVP1qFKfaw4ZIKCzIwBMFYtuRs q/DHtrNJ6gSVMji52hKpfPh7gwE2hGsSi77cnO2Fypzv0Po72VSqk/E41UlJGuKy ZSeGjKjtC+fQkqupyqmI0Yo42ppQFkSefdHWiKzxRvKZa/sJTOUfj6cm/r0A7MMV U3RV9PK3nwqDZafxsB5X =24RL -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 6.26-1.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package drupal6 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708746 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)---End Message---
Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 707400
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #lintian (2.5.13) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * collection/java-info: #+ [NT] Update a regex to cope with file(1) now calling JAR files # for Java Jar file rather than Zip archive. # (Closes: #707400) # limit source lintian Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'lintian' Limit currently set to 'source':'lintian' tags 707400 + pending Bug #707400 [lintian] lintian: FTBFS test failures in java test cases (onlyrun=java) Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 707400: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707400 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 708589
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 708589 + pending Bug #708589 [src:fwknop] fwknop: FTBFS: raising the section level of @appendixsubsec which is too low Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708589 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708831: upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:15 PM, David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote: I haven't had the time yet to debug why APT is choosing this route (and as said, dpkg/status file would help), but while this might not be ideal its not a bug in APT. Should I simply attach the whole file, grep something out, or send it to you off-list? -- Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708831: upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote: I don't think that debconf is relevant there. The problem is that the new python needs a new libc6 package, and thus if it is unpacked before libc6, it doesn't work anymore. This means that every python script on the system will fail (being called from a maintainer script or not), until the dependency is satisfied again. That's basically what I experienced, as well. vim (compiled with Python support on Debian) didn't work any more, I had to fall back on nano. I am just glad that dpkg and apt don't depend on Python ;) Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 708589
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 708589 + patch Bug #708589 [src:fwknop] fwknop: FTBFS: raising the section level of @appendixsubsec which is too low Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708589 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708954: [src:ikarus] GFDL non free license
Package: src:ikarus
Severity: serious
user: debian...@lists.debian.org
usertags: gfdl-invariant
The doc/ikarus-scheme-users-guide.tex is licensed under the non-free license:
% Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
% document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
% Version 1.2 published by the Free Software
% Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, the Front-Cover Texts
% being \emph{``Ikarus Scheme User's Guide''}, and
% no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the
% section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
I think you could ask upstream to relicense. If not please remove this file.
Bastien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708955: GFDL Problem
Package: imview-doc Severity: serious user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant This license is not free License: GFDL-1.1+ Permissionis granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no invariant section, with the Front-Cover Texts being this license page, and with no Back-Cover. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License in Appendix E. By law we should carry the license, I think upstream could be willing to relicense. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708831: upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote: Should I simply attach the whole file, grep something out, or send it to you off-list? Sent off-list, if anyone else needs it poke me. -- Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708956: [jwhois] GFDL non free license
Package: jwhois Severity: serious user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant The folowing file (manually checked) are non free with invariant version. doc/jwhois.texi doc/jwhois.info Could you please check if upstream is willing to relicense. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 707793
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 707793 + patch Bug #707793 [smcroute] smcroute: [PATCH] smcroute segfaults on vtun interfaces Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #707793 to the same tags previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 707793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707793 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#707355: marked as done (gpdftext: FTBFS: main.c:151:2: error: 'g_type_init' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gtype.h:669) [-Werror=deprecated-declarations])
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 18:33:04 + with message-id e1ue8po-0001cb...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#707355: fixed in gpdftext 0.1.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #707355, regarding gpdftext: FTBFS: main.c:151:2: error: 'g_type_init' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gtype.h:669) [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 707355: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707355 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: gpdftext Version: 0.1.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/poppler/glib -I/usr/include/poppler -I/usr/include/gtkspell-2.0 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Werror -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wall -g -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -g2 -Wall -c main.c main.c: In function 'main': main.c:151:2: error: 'g_type_init' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gtype.h:669) [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [main.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2013/05/09/gpdftext_0.1.5-1_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: gpdftext Source-Version: 0.1.6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gpdftext, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 707...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (supplier of updated gpdftext package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 18:48:58 +0100 Source: gpdftext Binary: gpdftext Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org Changed-By: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org Description: gpdftext - GTK+ text editor for ebook PDF files Closes: 707355 Changes: gpdftext (0.1.6-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. * Allow deprecated g_type_init for glib versions prior to 2.36 (Closes: #707355) * Update Vcs-Browser URL and standards version. Checksums-Sha1: a6e369a3e1851d6076bea3cf073c83c875f2bab8 2059 gpdftext_0.1.6-1.dsc d2795cdd106fcafaee608ab2846d66c22608d5ae 517523 gpdftext_0.1.6.orig.tar.gz 0fcb7ba43c89aa3d859c0b606b9fbf9e415bfa7c 2684 gpdftext_0.1.6-1.diff.gz 82789d5fb799dc4a61bd9d7ef4badee0a01e2ffe 67594 gpdftext_0.1.6-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: d5ba52a7e19a75f5c83b0863302cc3bf27c954375e5d60139016c808f0ac026e 2059 gpdftext_0.1.6-1.dsc 3d33dfcc618848092e5a2b5c542f07e8695066f1921069ce32a32765b4de42ae 517523 gpdftext_0.1.6.orig.tar.gz 6745676634ba37186a728fddb7326ff43f1dbae3d81ec5184aae439f1ae48d91 2684 gpdftext_0.1.6-1.diff.gz 3687b500b32cb8be081358f170039d3f83b87d896d9558962a5590c0215a6f7a 67594 gpdftext_0.1.6-1_amd64.deb Files: e24a62322e9c0caefd6ef9361a9fb3c7 2059 utils optional gpdftext_0.1.6-1.dsc 390dccf58844629e5c2642d6bae601fa 517523 utils optional
Bug#708366: marked as forwarded (pike7.8: FTBFS due to conflicting REG_* definitions)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 20:04:21 +0200 with message-id 201305192004.30...@proffe.kibibyte.se has caused the report #708366, regarding pike7.8: FTBFS due to conflicting REG_* definitions to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 708366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708366 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- OK, so now all of REG_EAX, REG_EBX and so on are defined on Linux, or rather, in the newest eglibc. Do you prefer renaming the enum items or #undef-ing all of them? -- Forwarded message -- Subject: Bug#708366: pike7.8: FTBFS due to conflicting REG_* definitions Date: onsdagen den 15 maj 2013 From: Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com To: sub...@bugs.debian.org Package: pike7.8 Version: 7.8.700-2 Severity: serious User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu saucy pike7.8 fails to build in unstable as follows: Compiling pikecode.c In file included from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/pikecode.c:25:0: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/code/ia32.c:22:16: error: redeclaration of enumerator 'REG_EAX' In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:360:0, from /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/sys/param.h:28, from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/pike_macros.h:14, from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/program.h:12, from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/pikecode.c:15: /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/sys/ucontext.h:180:3: note: previous definition of 'REG_EAX' was here In file included from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/pikecode.c:25:0: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/code/ia32.c:22:29: error: redeclaration of enumerator 'REG_EBX' In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:360:0, from /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/sys/param.h:28, from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/pike_macros.h:14, from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/program.h:12, from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/pikecode.c:15: /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/sys/ucontext.h:174:3: note: previous definition of 'REG_EBX' was here *snip* It looks painful to reliably avoid the enumeration values in sys/ucontext.h. I suggest simply renaming Pike's enumeration values. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] --- -- Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ---End Message---
Bug#707371: marked as done (drivel: FTBFS: main.c:802:2: error: 'g_mutex_new' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gthread.h:272) [-Werror=deprecated-declarations])
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 18:47:48 + with message-id e1ue8e4-0004na...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#707371: fixed in drivel 3.0.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #707371, regarding drivel: FTBFS: main.c:802:2: error: 'g_mutex_new' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gthread.h:272) [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 707371: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707371 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: drivel Version: 3.0.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DDRIVEL_GLADE_FILE=\/usr/share/drivel/glade/drivel-gtk.glade\ -DDATADIR=\/usr/share\ -DPREFIX=\/usr\ -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\Drivel\ -I.. -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Werror -Wdeclaration-after-statement -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libsoup-2.4 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtksourceview-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtkspell-2.0 -g -O2 -g2 -Wall -MT main.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/main.Tpo -c -o main.o main.c main.c: In function 'main': main.c:802:2: error: 'g_mutex_new' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gthread.h:272) [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [main.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2013/05/09/drivel_3.0.3-1_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: drivel Source-Version: 3.0.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of drivel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 707...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (supplier of updated drivel package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 19:30:35 +0100 Source: drivel Binary: drivel Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.0.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org Changed-By: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org Description: drivel - Blogging client for the GNOME desktop Closes: 661439 701627 707371 Changes: drivel (3.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * [i18n] French runtime messages translation (Closes: #661439) * Drop shlibs.local (Closes: #701627) * Drop -Werror from default build. (Closes: #707371) * Implement hardening flags in debian packaging. * Update SVN locations for SourceForge changes. * Add source format. Checksums-Sha1: 5f5ded1b01bbe1995963465c0b6e89f41afdccf4 2071 drivel_3.0.4-1.dsc db2513272f2ab302d74b7d0139fb312c9a95ab01 892850 drivel_3.0.4.orig.tar.gz 0e37820ac33be00eef0c0f0f3c3223944bc12ce3 12420 drivel_3.0.4-1.debian.tar.gz 10ef2fb347a5c1f0a4b845bfd5774b985a4d685e 433636 drivel_3.0.4-1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: af84700a69d507816a25a476308706e7f432972600d23b5105ad56e298462f5a 2071 drivel_3.0.4-1.dsc
Bug#708959: fakeroot: FTBFS due to failing test when /sbin is not part of $PATH
Package: fakeroot
Version: 1.19-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
test/t.xattr fails when $PATH does not contain /sbin: setcap and getcap
are not found in this case. The attached patch fixes this.
Cheers,
-Hilko
diff --git a/test/t.xattr b/test/t.xattr
index 39e0dd0..a1087fd 100755
--- a/test/t.xattr
+++ b/test/t.xattr
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ fi
mkdir $tmp
touch $tmp/foo
# fakeroot mangles spaces unless the getopt utility is the GNU version
-echo setcap cap_net_raw+ep $tmp/foo; getcap $tmp/foo $tmp/sh
+echo /sbin/setcap cap_net_raw+ep $tmp/foo; /sbin/getcap $tmp/foo $tmp/sh
run_fakeroot -- \
${posixshell} $tmp/sh $tmp/out
cat $tmp/out
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708831: upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)
Control: reassign -1 python2.7-minimal Am 19.05.2013 17:15, schrieb David Kalnischkies: Hi, The dpkg/status file before the upgrade could be helpful for reproducing. You can (hopefully) find it in /var/backup/ Helpful config options (I case someone wants to try) -o dir::state::status=./dpkg/status -o debug::pkgdpkgpm=true # displays dpkg calls rather than executing them -o debug::pkgorderlist=true # first stage order choices -o debug::pkgpackagemanager=true # second (and final) stage order choices On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote: /usr/bin/python: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) /usr/bin/python: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.16' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 While APT usually avoids it, its actually fine to have dependencies not satisfied for half-installed packages and prerm scripts do only give you the guarantee that your dependencies will be at least half-installed. well, only seen on i386, and apparently libc6-i686 is installed. Now why aren't the new libc6 packages unpacked first? I would assume to see more reports for this upgrade path. In the case of debconf, we don't even have a dependency on python, so its even more fine to choose this order for unpack. I haven't had the time yet to debug why APT is choosing this route (and as said, dpkg/status file would help), but while this might not be ideal its not a bug in APT. This smells more like a bug in dh_python2 which adds this prerm code which assumes that pyclean can be executed even if it isn't configured (aka that it behaves like an essential application), but I am not in the mood for bug-ping-pong so just CC'ed python maintainers for now, so they can have a look and comment on it while we will see whats up with APT to decide on this route (did I mention that a dpkg/status file would help? ;) ). so for now, I'm adding the libc6 dependency as a pre-dependency in python2.7-minimal, like perl-base is doing. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#708831: upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)
Processing control commands: reassign -1 python2.7-minimal Bug #708831 [apt] apt: packages unpacked in the wrong order Bug reassigned from package 'apt' to 'python2.7-minimal'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #708831 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #708831 to the same values previously set -- 708831: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708831 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708520: marked as done ([libguestfs0] libguestfs failure: ntfsprog is a transactionnal package)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 19:18:25 + with message-id e1ue97h-00030i...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#708520: fixed in libguestfs 1:1.21.39-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #708520, regarding [libguestfs0] libguestfs failure: ntfsprog is a transactionnal package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 708520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708520 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libguestfs0 Version: 1:1.21.33-1 Severity: serious tags:patch ntfsprog refuse to be downloaded during typical failure of tools: virt-sparsify --machine-readable -v virt-sparsify linux-swap zero Fatal error: exception Guestfs.Error(febootstrap-supermin-helper exited with error status 1. To see full error messages you may need to enable debugging. See http://libguestfs.org/guestfs-faq.1.html#debugging-libguestfs;) LANG=C update-guestfs-appliance febootstrap -v -o supermin.d --names bsdmainutils btrfs-tools cryptsetup e2fsprogs extlinux genisoimage gfs-tools gfs2-tools grub-pc hfsplus iproute libaugeas0 libcap2 libhivex0 libpcre3 libyajl2 linux-image mtools nilfs-tools ntfs-3g ntfsprogs openssh-client reiserfsprogs sysvinit ufsutils vim-tiny xz- utils zfs-fuse acl attr bash binutils bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils dosfstools file findutils gawk gdisk grep gzip jfsutils kmod less libxml2 lsof lsscsi lvm2 lzop mdadm module-init-tools parted procps procps-ng psmisc rsync scrub sed strace syslinux tar udev util-linux util-linux-ng xfsprogs zerofree --exclude ^perl --exclude ^python --exclude ^plymouth --exclude ^linux-firmware --exclude ^kbd- misc --exclude ^file-rc supermin 4.1.1 selected package handler: debian packages already present: wanted packages to download: acl adduser attr augeas-lenses base-files base- passwd bash bind9-host binutils bsdmainutils bsdutils btrfs-tools bzip2 cdebconf cman coreutils corosync cpio cryptsetup cryptsetup-bin dash debconf debianutils diffutils dmsetup dosfstools dpkg e2fslibs e2fsprogs extlinux file findutils fuse gawk gcc-4.7-base gdisk genisoimage gettext-base gfs-tools gfs2-tools grep groff-base grub-common grub-pc grub-pc-bin grub2- common gzip heimdal-clients hfsplus inetutils-telnet initscripts insserv install-info iproute jfsutils kmod krb5-clients krb5-config less libacl1 libaio1 libasn1-8-heimdal libasprintf0c2 libattr1 libaudit0 libaugeas0 libavahi- client3 libavahi-common-data libavahi-common3 libbind9-80 libblkid1 libbsd0 libbz2-1.0 libc-bin libc6 libcap-ng0 libcap2 libccs3 libcfg4 libclass-isa-perl libcman3 libcomerr2 libconfdb4 libcoroipcc4 libcoroipcs4 libcpg4 libcryptsetup4 libdb5.1 libdbus-1-3 libdebian-installer4 libdevmapper-event1.02.1 libdevmapper1.02.1 libdlm3 libdlmcontrol3 libdns88 libedit2 libevs4 libexpat1 libfence4 libfreetype6 libfuse2 libgcc1 libgcrypt11 libgdbm3 libgeoip1 libgnutls26 libgpg-error0 libgssapi-krb5-2 libgssapi3-heimdal libhcrypto4- heimdal libhdb9-heimdal libheimbase1-heimdal libheimntlm0-heimdal libhfsp0 libhivex0 libhx509-5-heimdal libicu48 libidn11 libisc84 libisccc80 libisccfg82 libk5crypto3 libkadm5clnt7-heimdal libkadm5srv8-heimdal libkafs0-heimdal libkeyutils1 libkmod2 libkrb5-26-heimdal libkrb5-3 libkrb5support0 libldap-2.4-2 liblogsys4 liblogthread3 liblwres80 liblzma5 liblzo2-2 libmagic1 libmount1 libncurses5 libncursesw5 libnet-snmp-perl libnet-telnet-perl libnewt0.52 libnl-3-200 libnl-route-3-200 libnspr4 libnspr4-0d libnss3 libnss3-1d libnuma1 libopenipmi0 libotp0-heimdal libp11-kit0 libpam-modules libpam-modules-bin libpam0g libparted0debian1 libpcre3 libperl4-corelibs-perl libperl5.14 libpload4 libpopt0 libprocps0 libquorum4 libreadline5 libreadline6 libroken18- heimdal libsaamf3 libsackpt3 libsaclm3 libsaevt3 libsalck3 libsam4 libsamsg4 libsasl2-2 libsatmr3 libselinux1 libsemanage-common libsemanage1 libsensors4 libsepol1 libsgutils2-2 libshishi0 libsigsegv2 libsl0-heimdal libslang2 libsnmp-base libsnmp15 libsqlite3-0 libss2 libssl1.0.0 libstdc++6 libswitch-perl libtasn1-3 libtextwrap1 libtinfo5 libtotem-pg4 libudev0 libustr-1.0-1 libuuid1 libvirt0 libvotequorum4 libwind0-heimdal libwrap0 libxml2 libxml2- utils libyajl2 lsb-base lsof lsscsi lvm2 lzop makedev mawk mdadm mime-support module-init-tools mount mtools multiarch-support netbase nilfs-tools ntfs-3g ntfsprogs openais openipmi openssh-client original-awk parted passwd procps psmisc readline-common reiserfsprogs rsync scrub sed sensible- utils sg3-utils shishi-common snmp strace syslinux syslinux-common sysv-rc sysvinit sysvinit-utils tar telnet
Processed: Pending
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 685779 + pending Bug #685779 [sysvinit-utils] service/invoke-rc.d: warnings if upstart installed but not running Added tag(s) pending. tags 694252 + pending Bug #694252 [sysv-rc] sysv-rc: migration to dependency based boot order fails if bootchart from lenny is still installed Added tag(s) pending. tags 423528 + pending Bug #423528 [sysvinit-utils] sysvinit: bootlogd broken with no error message Added tag(s) pending. tags 606505 + pending Bug #606505 [sysv-rc] sysv-rc: update-rc.d(8) gives bad example for disabling a service Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 423528: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423528 606505: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606505 685779: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685779 694252: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694252 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708959: Acknowledgement (fakeroot: FTBFS due to failing test when /sbin is not part of $PATH)
This happens when trying to build the fakeroot package using dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot. With sbuild, everything seems to work fine. Cheers, -Hilko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708831: upgrade-reports: [sid-sid] left system barely unusable (manually fixed with dpkg --install)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: Am 19.05.2013 17:15, schrieb David Kalnischkies: The dpkg/status file before the upgrade could be helpful for reproducing. You can (hopefully) find it in /var/backup/ Helpful config options (I case someone wants to try) -o dir::state::status=./dpkg/status -o debug::pkgdpkgpm=true # displays dpkg calls rather than executing them -o debug::pkgorderlist=true # first stage order choices -o debug::pkgpackagemanager=true # second (and final) stage order choices On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote: /usr/bin/python: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) /usr/bin/python: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.16' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 While APT usually avoids it, its actually fine to have dependencies not satisfied for half-installed packages and prerm scripts do only give you the guarantee that your dependencies will be at least half-installed. well, only seen on i386, and apparently libc6-i686 is installed. Now why aren't the new libc6 packages unpacked first? I would assume to see more reports for this upgrade path. Its caused by the remove of libescpr1 (src:epson-inkjet-printer-escpr) in Richards case, which ignoring the ubuntu-popcon spike has a 25.000 score, so not installed by everyone and even if you have it installed you might have upgraded your libc6 earlier (as the libescpr1 drop is just two days old) or APT chooses a different package to handle first [removes are done relatively early compared to other actions]. I guess there are other situations where you can reach this problem, but you need to be a bit lucky. Describing exactly whats going on is not only offtopic, but also complicated, so lets just say that APT is choosing here a bad way of handling things, but while its not a good idea its a valid one. (people wanting to explore the misery can follow the word DepRemove) This smells more like a bug in dh_python2 which adds this prerm code which assumes that pyclean can be executed even if it isn't configured (aka that it behaves like an essential application), but I am not in the mood for bug-ping-pong so just CC'ed python maintainers for now, so they can have a look and comment on it while we will see whats up with APT to decide on this route (did I mention that a dpkg/status file would help? ;) ). so for now, I'm adding the libc6 dependency as a pre-dependency in python2.7-minimal, like perl-base is doing. While this should work to fix this exact bug, its still papering over the problem indicated by the bug: python isn't essential, so pre* scripts can't assume that python is working. Usually you are lucky enough that it works by accident, but bugs like this one show that you can very well be in a system state which is allowed by policy but python isn't working. (assuming the chosen order is better, e.g. loops can trigger this) To really fix this you have to ensure that a) python always works even in half-installed state OR b) all packages using dh_python2 prerm snippets pre-depend on python OR c) cleaning is moved to post* scripts and just depend on python OR d) the dh_python2 prerm snippet works without a configured python by using shell/perl/$essential tools only. Same goes for python3 and dh_python3. I am CCing the debconf maintainers btw as their prerm script looks really strange with 3 different ways of cleaning up pyc and pyo files – one handwritten shell and two added by dh_python2 (one requiring python and a fallback in shell). Best regards David Kalnischkies -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708966: GFDL non free documentation
Package: libmatheval Severity: serious user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant The following files doc/libmatheval.info doc/libmatheval.texi Are not free and include gfdl license with invariant section. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708967: top man page is non free (GFDL with invariant)
Package: manpages-fr Version: 3.44d1p1-1 user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious top manpage is realeased under a non free license. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708968: [manpages-ja] top man pages is non free
Package: manpages-ja user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious top manpage is released under the non free gfdl with backcover -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708969: [mathgl] Non free GFDL
Package: src:mathgl user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant severity: serious The following files are non free: texinfo/mathgl_en.texi texinfo/mathgl_ru.texi (manually checked) texinfo/mgl_ru.texi texinfo/mgl_en.texi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708970: [mh-e] GFDL non free doc
Package: mh-e Severity: serious user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant The following file is not free. doc/doc/misc/mh-e.texi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708971: README is still under infamous GFDL with invariant
Package: src:muse-el Severity: serious user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant Everything is in subject. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: reassign 708967 to procps, found 708967 in 1:3.3.4-2, affects 708967
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 708967 procps Bug #708967 [manpages-fr] top man page is non free (GFDL with invariant) Bug reassigned from package 'manpages-fr' to 'procps'. No longer marked as found in versions manpages-fr/3.44d1p1-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #708967 to the same values previously set found 708967 1:3.3.4-2 Bug #708967 [procps] top man page is non free (GFDL with invariant) Marked as found in versions procps/1:3.3.4-2. affects 708967 manpages-fr Bug #708967 [procps] top man page is non free (GFDL with invariant) Added indication that 708967 affects manpages-fr thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708967: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708967 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#610538: marked as done (crunchyfrog should depend on python-xdg)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 23:22:49 +0200 with message-id cadk7b0p+efp2vupwvlzzsy75sgknpqzepwxtbuf-9xfvxf5...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Removed package from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #610538, regarding crunchyfrog should depend on python-xdg to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 610538: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610538 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: crunchyfrog Version: 0.4.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable crunchyfrog doesn't appear to depend on python-xdg. I get this when i run 0.4.1-1 on a system without python-xdg: 0 dkg@pip:~$ crunchyfrog jobs/urban/imagesurvey/imagesurvey.db Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/crunchyfrog, line 5, in module import cf.cmdline File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/cf/__init__.py, line 67, in module from xdg import BaseDirectory as base_dir ImportError: No module named xdg 1 dkg@pip:~$ installing python-xdg lets it bring up the GUI without an explicit failure. --dkg -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-trunk-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages crunchyfrog depends on: ii python 2.6.6-3+squeeze5 interactive high-level object-orie ii python-support 1.0.10 automated rebuilding support for P crunchyfrog recommends no packages. Versions of packages crunchyfrog suggests: ii gnome-icon-theme 2.30.3-2 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii ipython 0.10-2 enhanced interactive Python shell ii python-gnome2 2.28.1-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desk pn python-gnome2-extras none (no description available) pn python-mysqldbnone (no description available) ii python-psycopg2 2.2.1-1Python module for PostgreSQL pn python-pymssqlnone (no description available) pn python-vtenone (no description available) -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.4.1-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package crunchyfrog has been removed from the Debian archive experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/708882 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.---End Message---
