Bug#900095: marked as done (FTBFS against xserver-xorg-core 1.20.0)

Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2018 05:34:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#900095: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-vmware 1:13.3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #900095, regarding FTBFS against xserver-xorg-core 1.20.0 to be marked as done. This

Bug#900095: FTBFS against xserver-xorg-core 1.20.0

Source: xserver-xorg-video-vmware Version: 13.2.1-1 Severity: serious The recent update of xserver-xorg-core to 1.20.0 makes the package FTBFS as can be seen by the latest binNMU https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xserver-xorg-video-vmware make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/build/saa'

Bug#899124: fonts-font-awesome: completely breaks web applications, with no notice

Le mardi 22 mai 2018 à 21:16:14+0530, Vasudev Kamath a écrit : > Hi Antonio, > > Antonio Terceiro writes: > > > Control: forwarded -1 > > https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-font-awesome/merge_requests/1 > > > > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 06:15:08PM -0300, Antonio

Bug#900089: [zfs-dkms]

What is the output of # lsb_release -is ?

Bug#899466: marked as done (bzr-loom: Invalid maintainer address pkg-bazaar-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 22:17:46 +0100 with message-id <20180525211746.GA20451@blodeuwedd> and subject line Migrated to alioth-lists.debian.net has caused the Debian Bug report #899466, regarding bzr-loom: Invalid maintainer address pkg-bazaar-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org to be

Bug#899886: marked as done (bzr-xmloutput: Invalid maintainer address pkg-bazaar-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 22:17:46 +0100 with message-id <20180525211746.GA20451@blodeuwedd> and subject line Migrated to alioth-lists.debian.net has caused the Debian Bug report #899886, regarding bzr-xmloutput: Invalid maintainer address pkg-bazaar-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org to be

Bug#899875: marked as done (bzr-explorer: Invalid maintainer address pkg-bazaar-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 22:17:46 +0100 with message-id <20180525211746.GA20451@blodeuwedd> and subject line Migrated to alioth-lists.debian.net has caused the Debian Bug report #899875, regarding bzr-explorer: Invalid maintainer address pkg-bazaar-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org to be

Bug#900046: marked as done (ifupdown doesn't work inside lxc)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 21:06:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#900046: fixed in ifupdown 0.8.34 has caused the Debian Bug report #900046, regarding ifupdown doesn't work inside lxc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#899496: marked as done (f2fs-tools: Invalid maintainer address filesystems-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 21:58:49 +0100 with message-id <20180525205849.pqlxdvxiko3vn...@urchin.earth.li> and subject line Re: Bug#899496: f2fs-tools: Invalid maintainer address filesystems-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #899496, regarding f2fs-tools:

Bug#681726: Eclipse is 6 Years Behind in Debian

Hello, Am 25.05.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Josh Blagden: > Hi folks, > >     I just wanted to make the observation that Debian has had the same > version of Eclipse for the last six years. When can we expect to see a > new version to the Debian repository? Maybe when a solar and lunar eclipse happen

Bug#900084: haproxy: CVE-2018-11469

Source: haproxy Version: 1.8.0-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch security upstream fixed-upstream Hi, The following vulnerability was published for haproxy. CVE-2018-11469[0]: | Incorrect caching of responses to requests including an Authorization | header in HAProxy 1.8.0 through 1.8.9 (if cache

Processed: notfixed 899773 in 0.12.0-1, notfixed 897000 in 3.1.0-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # do not confuse the bts with invalid bugs > notfixed 899773 0.12.0-1 Bug #899773 {Done: Yves-Alexis Perez } [src:exo] exo: Invalid maintainer address pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org No longer marked as fixed in

Bug#899475: marked as done (cjs: Invalid maintainer address pkg-cinnamon-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 19:58:02 +0200 with message-id <20180525175800.m4gnc7y7yqpe4...@neoptolemo.gnuservers.com.ar> and subject line Re: Bug#899475: cjs: Invalid maintainer address pkg-cinnamon-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #899475, regarding cjs:

Bug#899785: marked as done (exe-thumbnailer: Invalid maintainer address pkg-wine-pa...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 17:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#899785: fixed in exe-thumbnailer 0.10.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #899785, regarding exe-thumbnailer: Invalid maintainer address

Processed: severity of 900036 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 900036 important Bug #900036 [firmware-nonfree] firmware-nonfree: Buster kernel needs updated (upstream) firmware versions Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#900069: openmpi: mpicc/mpicxx comiler wrappers set rpath

On Fri, May 25, 2018, at 11:43 CDT, Graham Inggs wrote: > I hit this problem in 3.1.0-4 a few hours ago, before 3.1.0-5 was > picked up by the mirrors. > > Are you sure this still occurs in 3.1.0-5? Otherwise, this is a > duplicate of #899391. I don't think so. I have: #

Bug#900073: clementine: fails to play anything: streaming stopped, reason not linked (-1)

Package: clementine Version: 1.3.1+git542-gf00d9727c+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Since the last update clementine [1] refuses to play any files. clementine was able to play these files in previously. I see the following error messages: 18:50:13.677 ERROR GstEnginePipeline:65212

Bug#891994: Qt5 migration of EpiGrass? (Was: Bug#891994: epigrass: Depends on Qt4-only python-qwt5-qt4)

Hi Andreas, Thank you for the information. We do plan to work in the migration to Qt5. best regards, Claudia De: Andreas Tille Enviado: sexta-feira, 25 de maio de 2018 09:14:51 Para: 891...@bugs.debian.org; Flávio Codeço Coelho; Cláudia

Bug#900069: openmpi: mpicc/mpicxx comiler wrappers set rpath

I hit this problem in 3.1.0-4 a few hours ago, before 3.1.0-5 was picked up by the mirrors. Are you sure this still occurs in 3.1.0-5? Otherwise, this is a duplicate of #899391.

Bug#900069: openmpi: mpicc/mpicxx comiler wrappers set rpath

Source: openmpi Version: 3.1.0-5 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Openmpi version 3.1.0 (3.1.0-5) configures mpicc/mpicxx with an rpath/new-dtags: $ mpicc --showme LINKER gcc LINKER [...] -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openmpi/lib -Wl,--enable-new-dtags

Processed: Re: debian-installer: Installer showes Debootstrap Error debian stretch live installation

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 866629 debian-installer: live installation without internet > connection fails with "failed to determine the codename for the release." Bug #866629 [live-installer] debian-installer: Installer showes Debootstrap Error debian stretch

Bug#866629: debian-installer: Installer showes Debootstrap Error debian stretch live installation

retitle 866629 debian-installer: live installation without internet connection fails with "failed to determine the codename for the release." thanks (I've only skimmed the bug so only 80% sure it is internet connection- related, but I think a rename might make it easier to find/parse at the very

Processed: tagging 900051

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # stretch is not affected > tags 900051 + sid buster Bug #900051 [libgnupg-interface-perl] libgnupg-interface-perl: t/get_public_keys.t fails with gnupg2/2.2.7-1 Added tag(s) buster and sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: Re: Bug#900051: libgnupg-interface-perl: t/get_public_keys.t fails with gnupg2/2.2.7-1

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #900051 [libgnupg-interface-perl] libgnupg-interface-perl: t/get_public_keys.t fails with gnupg2/2.2.7-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 900051: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900051 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#884481: marked as done (libbatik-java: Squiggle will not open files: access denied)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 13:19:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#884481: fixed in batik 1.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #884481, regarding libbatik-java: Squiggle will not open files: access denied to be marked as done. This

Processed: Re: ifupdown doesn't work inside lxc

Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #900046 [ifupdown] ifupdown doesn't work inside lxc Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' -- 900046: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900046 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Qt5 migration of EpiGrass? (Was: Bug#891994: epigrass: Depends on Qt4-only python-qwt5-qt4)

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 Cláudia Torres Codeço , Flávio Codeço Coelho > Bug #891994 [epigrass] epigrass: Depends on Qt4-only python-qwt5-qt4 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'Cláudia Torres Codeço , Flávio Codeço

Bug#891994: Qt5 migration of EpiGrass? (Was: Bug#891994: epigrass: Depends on Qt4-only python-qwt5-qt4)

Control: forwarded -1 Cláudia Torres Codeço , Flávio Codeço Coelho Control: tags -1 help Control: tags -1 upstream Hi Cláudia and Flávio, the Debian package of EpiGrass received a serious bug report which means that we can not distribute EpiGrass with

Bug#900059: libgit2: Testsuite failure due to alignment-related crashes

Source: libgit2 Version: 0.23.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch upstream Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc64 Hello! libgit2's testsuite fails because of an unaligned access which affects both mipsel (and mips64el in experimental) as

Bug#899775: mc: Invalid maintainer address pkg-mc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Uh, somebody did not answer the call to salvage this list Should we try to ask alioth-lists admins? Any other idea how to communicate about mc Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#873341: Any news for this issue?

Hi, I once libscala-pickling-java and I wonder whether I could provide any help. I'd love to finalise the project that made me stumbling about sbt last year. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#897436: marked as done (broken nautilus integration)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 11:06:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897436: fixed in owncloud-client 2.4.1+dfsg-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #897436, regarding broken nautilus integration to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#890993: (Bug#890993) primer3 FTBFS on big endian: test failure

Hi Liubov, On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:36:54PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > I tried to figure out what exactly could cause the failure. The error > refers to the test files in the kmer_lists directory that are in binary > format. It seems they were generated on a little-endian architecture,

Bug#900032: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#900032: mocha: missing-copyright-file /usr/share/doc/mocha/copyright

Hi, I am really clueless. You are right but it will do this only with upgrade. I have used correctly dpkg-maintscript-helper. Could you crosscheck, my script ? Bastien On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:58 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: mocha > Version: 4.1.0+ds1-1 > Severity:

Bug#890993: (Bug#890993) primer3 FTBFS on big endian: test failure

Hi Andreas, Hi all, I tried to figure out what exactly could cause the failure. The error refers to the test files in the kmer_lists directory that are in binary format. It seems they were generated on a little-endian architecture, that is why the test fails on big-endian when it tries to verify

Bug#897691: marked as done (python3-hbmqtt: overly generic python module name: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/scripts/__init__.py)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 10:05:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#897691: fixed in python-hbmqtt 0.9.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #897691, regarding python3-hbmqtt: overly generic python module name:

Processed: severity of libghc-cmark-gdm-dev is RC, breaks pandoc

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 897001 serious Bug #897001 [libghc-cmark-gfm-dev] libghc-cmark-gfm-dev: not big-endian-safe Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 897001:

Bug#895612: marked as done (haskell-protobuf: FTBFS: testCase import ambiguity)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 09:49:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#895612: fixed in haskell-protobuf 0.2.1.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #895612, regarding haskell-protobuf: FTBFS: testCase import ambiguity to be marked as done.

Bug#894333: marked as done (torbrowser-launcher: Should recommend rebooting when upgrading to >= 0.2.9-2~ for the first time)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 09:36:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#894333: fixed in torbrowser-launcher 0.2.9-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #894333, regarding torbrowser-launcher: Should recommend rebooting when upgrading to >=

Bug#900018: FTBFS with latest cmdliner

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > I have the feeling that OPAM team is not willing to support OPAM 1.2.2 > for a long time. So it doesn't make sense, at least for me, to > include it in Buster. > > Yesterday, I've uploaded opam-file-format to NEW. As soon

Bug#898976: openjdk-7: 2018 Q2 security update

On Fri, 18 May 2018 08:29:14 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Source: openjdk-7 > Version: 7u171-2.6.13-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: security > > Hi, > > As usual, there are a few security issues from 2018 Q2. There's no update > yet, though it's in progress: > >

Bug#900014: radvd: /etc/radvd.conf syntax error, unexpected T_BAD_TOKEN, expecting '{'

Control: retitle -1 radvd: What is wrong with my configuration ? Control: severity -1 minor Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 07:09:12PM +0200, MANAOUIL KARIM wrote: > > Whenever i start the deamon, i get the following syntax error, i have no idea > what's wrong: > > [May 24

Processed: Re: Bug#900014: radvd: /etc/radvd.conf syntax error, unexpected T_BAD_TOKEN, expecting '{'

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 radvd: What is wrong with my configuration ? Bug #900014 [radvd] rradvd: /etc/radvd.conf syntax error, unexpected T_BAD_TOKEN, expecting '{' Changed Bug title to 'radvd: What is wrong with my configuration ?' from 'rradvd: /etc/radvd.conf syntax error,

Bug#900018: FTBFS with latest cmdliner

Hi Andy, On 2018-05-25 08:40, Andy Li wrote: I've a patch: https://github.com/ocaml/opam/compare/1.2.2...andyli:1.2.2-fix.patch That's great! FWIW, I've opened this bug report so that Opam doesn't migrate to testing before being fixed or updated to a newer version. I have the feeling that

Bug#900018: FTBFS with latest cmdliner

I've a patch: https://github.com/ocaml/opam/compare/1.2.2...andyli:1.2.2-fix.patch It's based on the discussion with upstream at https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/the-forever-beta-issue/1779/6 Best regards, Andy

Bug#899966: marked as done (cairo-dock-plug-ins: Invalid maintainer address pkg-cairo-dock-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org)

Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2018 06:36:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#899966: fixed in cairo-dock-plug-ins 3.4.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #899966, regarding cairo-dock-plug-ins: Invalid maintainer address

Bug#900039: freetype: Building with apt-build fails with error in /src/sfnt/ttcmap.c

Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible Control: severity -1 normal On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:23:07AM +0200, Jonathan Dumke wrote: > Source: freetype > Version: 2.8.1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > Dear Maintainer, > I

Processed: Re: Bug#900039: freetype: Building with apt-build fails with error in /src/sfnt/ttcmap.c

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible Bug #900039 [src:freetype] freetype: Building with apt-build fails with error in /src/sfnt/ttcmap.c Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. > severity -1 normal Bug #900039 [src:freetype] freetype: Building with apt-build fails