Your message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2019 06:34:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#914731: fixed in r-bioc-biocparallel 1.18.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #914731,
regarding r-bioc-biocparallel: autopkgtest regression
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:09:47 +0200
with message-id <9c29c2769bd0c3542e65ca65e4338e834283f54d.ca...@z-51.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#932603: missing dependency on libnet1
has caused the Debian Bug report #932603,
regarding missing dependency on libnet1
to be marked as done.
This me
On 22/07/2019 13:09, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
Ooops. We don't want ‘cryptsetup’ to hard-depend on ‘cryptsetup-initramfs’,
as that would make the 2:2.0.3-1 package split moot. I just uploaded
2:2.1.0-7 where ‘cryptsetup’ *Recommends* ‘cryptsetup-initramfs’, which
is enough to convince APT not to au
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 913293
Bug #913293 [src:tcl8.5] tcl8.5: Time to remove from Debian
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
913293: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913293
Debian B
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 01:13:51AM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Hm, let's give this a quick fix as a sound one. My plan is to whitelist
> all the syscalls used by fakeroot. Are you aware of other environments
> that might be caught by the same issue? Or in other words, which
> sys
Package: lirc
Version: 0.10.1-5.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Control: found -1 0.10.1-6
The versions of lirc in both buster and testing/unstable do not install
cleanly and are left in a half configured state. This appears to be due
to the file /etc/lirc/lirc_options.co
Processing control commands:
> found -1 0.10.1-6
Bug #932779 [lirc] lirc: Fails to install due to missing
/etc/lirc/lirc_options.conf
Marked as found in versions lirc/0.10.1-6.
--
932779: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932779
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debi
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:07:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932762: fixed in file 1:5.37-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #932762,
regarding fakeroot file somefile: Bad system call
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Control: tags 932762 pending
Helmut Grohne wrote...
> Package: file
> Version: 1:5.37-3
> Severity: serious
> Control: affects -1 + src:unbound
>
> file no longer works under fakeroot. For example:
(...)
> Can we please disable seccomp until a solution for fakeroot is found?
Hm, let's give this
Processing control commands:
> tags 932762 pending
Bug #932762 [file] fakeroot file somefile: Bad system call
Added tag(s) pending.
--
932762: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932762
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 923307 patch
Bug #923307 [coquelicot] coquelicot: Uploading file fails
Added tag(s) patch.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
923307: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923307
Debian B
Hi,
after my freedombox upgraded from stretch to buster, I've noticed that
I can't use coquelicot to share files any more.
Here is patch, that at least makes coquelicot usable on buster.
It's available on salsa as well, if it's more convenient to take.
https://salsa.debian.org/skv-guest/coquelic
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:35:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#929567: fixed in emacs 1:26.1+1-3.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #929567,
regarding libgtk-3-0:amd64: Emacs constantly crashes on startup with "X
protocol error: BadLength..."
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:35:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#929567: fixed in emacs 1:26.1+1-3.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #929567,
regarding emacs: Emacs crash when one particual char is shown
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: file
Version: 1:5.37-3
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 + src:unbound
file no longer works under fakeroot. For example:
$ fakeroot file /bin/true
Bad system call
$ echo $?
159
$
This is relevant when packages that still require root for building use
fakeroot and then call file. aut
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:unbound
Bug #932762 [file] fakeroot file somefile: Bad system call
Added indication that 932762 affects src:unbound
--
932762: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932762
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Hi Elena,
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:21:22 +0200 Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
> Of course after the release the severity can be raised back, as then it
> would apply to the majority of users indeed (but I'd just upload the
> new version of the package and be done with it).
With the buster release and
Hello
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Jakob Haufe wrote:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 09:40:06 +0800 gustavo panizzo wrote:
I've just uploaded 2.0.0-4 to experimental
Please note that this still fails on DebCI, presumably because tests
are run as non-root by default, which means /usr/sbin i
Package: libeclipselink-java
Version: 2.6.6-1
Severity: grave
When running a very simple test application, or indeed any production
application I have at hand, using the Debian-packaged version of EclipseLink, I
run into the following error when calling
javax.persistence.Persistence.createEntit
Package: mediawiki2latex
Version: 7.33-2
On 7/18/19 2:52 AM, peter green wrote:
That seems OTT, textlive-generic-reccomended is a transitional package
with no content and a dependency on texlive-plain-generic, so changing
the dependency to texlive-plain-generic should fix this bug without
br
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:04:23 +0200
with message-id <0f0028d1-390c-6be7-388d-9401f9130...@googlemail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#932186: mediawiki2latex depends on cruft package.
has caused the Debian Bug report #932186,
regarding auto-multiple-choice depends on cruft package.
to b
the nmu is now in the delayed queue.
the nmu now in the delayed queue.
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2019 15:20:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932732: fixed in python-slugify 3.0.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #932732,
regarding python-slugify: autopkgtest failing since 3.0.2-1 update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #932732 [src:python-slugify] python-slugify: autopkgtest failing since
3.0.2-1 update
Added tag(s) pending.
--
932732: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932732
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #932732 in python-slugify reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-slugify/commit/c8552707e
Sir/madam,I humbly seek your consent for an investment in your
country.I need to invest in the following areas by your candid advice
and supervision; industrial, petroleum energy , land farming..More
details of this will be sent following your INVESTMENT suggestion and
interest. I am deeply sorry f
Hi folks,
after each new upload of r-bioc-biocparallel the autopkgtest fails in a
different way. Currently I have no good idea what might be the problem
and currently its also urgent to fix it since if we don't our whole BioC
stack will be removed from testing which we need to prevent.
Any idea
Source: python-slugify
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
autopkgtests are failing since 3.0.2-1. This is related to the
text-unidecode dependency not being satisfied (instead we use unidecode)
and might break other packages.
I'm working on it.
regards,
Hugo
--
Hugo Lefeuvre
Source: libunwind
Version: 1.2.1-9
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I was running i-g-t on MIPS and hit a segfault during a stack
trace dump.
I then built the package from source to reproduce it
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:20:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#931169: fixed in hfst 3.15.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #931169,
regarding hfst: add Breaks: libhfst45-dev for smoother upgrades from stretch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Thanks for confirming the bug.
When is the fix (or the fixed version 10.3.16) going to make it into
Buster?
Roman
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 09:40:06 +0800 gustavo panizzo wrote:
> I've just uploaded 2.0.0-4 to experimental
Please note that this still fails on DebCI, presumably because tests
are run as non-root by default, which means /usr/sbin is not in $PATH.
A local test, with debian/tests/run-uhubctl-v changed
Package: command-not-found
Version: 18.04.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Trying to execute any command that is not found (e.g. entering at the
command line) gives the following output:
---
Could not find the dat
34 matches
Mail list logo
