Processed: block 953701 with 954628

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 953701 with 954628 Bug #953701 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:pycallgraph] src:pycallgraph: fails to migrate to testing for too long 953701 was not blocked by any bugs. 953701 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 953701: 954628 >

Processed: block 953781 with 953996

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 953781 with 953996 Bug #953781 [src:julia] src:julia: fails to migrate to testing for too long 953781 was not blocked by any bugs. 953781 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 953781: 953996 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#956400: marked as done (qpdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs libatomic)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:54:12 -0400 with message-id <19e51f3b-81ec-4039-8023-e924ab054...@www.fastmail.com> and subject line fixed in 10.0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #956400, regarding qpdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs libatomic to be marked as done.

Bug#956400: Processed: retitle 956400 to qpdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs libatomic

2020-04-10 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Oops, I fixed this, but I made a cut and paste error and "Closed" the wrong bug number in the changelog. I wlll clean it up tomorrow by removing the fixed version from the wrong bug and adding it to the right one. On Fri, Apr 10, 2020, at 1:39 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing

Bug#956339: unattended-upgrades: regression: packages with conffile prompts are no longer skipped, leading to upgrade failures

2020-04-10 Thread Paul Wise
Control: reopen -1 On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 21:28 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I've tested this by downgrading popularity-contest using snapshot.d.o, > adding changes to a conffile and then running u-u. The result is that I > get this in the report, so it looks fixed again: Actually it looks like

Processed: Re: Bug#956339: unattended-upgrades: regression: packages with conffile prompts are no longer skipped, leading to upgrade failures

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #956339 {Done: Paul Wise } [unattended-upgrades] unattended-upgrades: regression: packages with conffile prompts are no longer skipped, leading to upgrade failures 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed

Bug#939995: libltcsmpte: no reverse dependencies - remove from the archive?

2020-04-10 Thread Boyuan Yang
X-Debbugs-CC: sramac...@debian.org ales...@debian.org ro...@gareus.org Hi, On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:29:52 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: src:libltcsmpte > Version: 0.4.4-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > > libltcsmpte currently does not have any reverse dependencies in the

Bug#937784: marked as done (python-gevent: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Apr 2020 00:33:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937784: fixed in python-gevent 1.4.0-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #937784, regarding python-gevent: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: python-gevent: diff for NMU version 1.4.0-1.2

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 937784 + patch Bug #937784 [src:python-gevent] python-gevent: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #937784 to the same tags previously set > tags 953956 + patch Bug #953956 [python-gevent-doc] python-gevent-doc: should install

Bug#937784: python-gevent: diff for NMU version 1.4.0-1.2

2020-04-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tags 937784 + patch Control: tags 953956 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for python-gevent (versioned as 1.4.0-1.2). The diff is attached to this message. Please consider maintaining python-gevent with the Debian Python Modules team Regards. diff -Nru

Processed: python-gevent: diff for NMU version 1.4.0-1.2

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 937784 + patch Bug #937784 [src:python-gevent] python-gevent: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) patch. > tags 953956 + patch Bug #953956 [python-gevent-doc] python-gevent-doc: should install doc in /usr/share/doc/python-gevent-doc/ Added tag(s)

Bug#950038: Looks like a bug in httplib2 rather than on wsgi-intercept

2020-04-10 Thread Colin Watson
Control: reassign -1 python-wsgi-intercept 1.8.1-2 Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 python3-httplib2 0.14.0-1 Control: retitle -2 python3-httplib2 >= 1.13.0 breaks python3-wsgi-intercept << 1.9.0 Control: block -2 by -1 On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:43:03PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >

Processed: Re: Bug#950038: Looks like a bug in httplib2 rather than on wsgi-intercept

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 python-wsgi-intercept 1.8.1-2 Bug #950038 [python3-httplib2] python-wsgi-intercept FTBFS: test failures Bug reassigned from package 'python3-httplib2' to 'python-wsgi-intercept'. No longer marked as found in versions python-httplib2/0.14.0-1. Ignoring

Bug#937694: marked as done (python-decorator: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:48:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937694: fixed in python-decorator 4.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #937694, regarding python-decorator: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Bug#937694 marked as pending in python-decorator

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #937694 [src:python-decorator] python-decorator: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 937694: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937694 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#937694: marked as pending in python-decorator

2020-04-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937694 in python-decorator reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: py2removal bugs severity updates - 2020-04-10 22:36:11.833844+00:00

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2 > from bullseye > # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal > # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html > # See

Bug#956423: node-request: deprecated upstream: should not be part of next stable Debian release

2020-04-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le ven. 10 avr. 2020 à 23:48, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Package: node-request > Version: 2.88.1-4 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Upstream has deprecated this module: >

Bug#956423: node-request: deprecated upstream: should not be part of next stable Debian release

2020-04-10 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: node-request Version: 2.88.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Upstream has deprecated this module: https://github.com/request/request/issues/3142 It already has seen no new updates for a year, and is not expected

Bug#950221: marked as done (natsort 6.0 doesn't support Python 3.8)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 21:40:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#950221: fixed in natsort 7.0.1-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #950221, regarding natsort 6.0 doesn't support Python 3.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#955012: marked as done (src:librouteros: fails to migrate to testing for too long)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 21:39:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#955012: fixed in librouteros 3.0.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #955012, regarding src:librouteros: fails to migrate to testing for too long to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#955652: marked as done (dvdbackup: FTBFS: dvdbackup.c:1282:29: error: ‘ifo_handle_t’ {aka ‘struct ’} has no member named ‘file’)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 21:34:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#955652: fixed in dvdbackup 0.4.2-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #955652, regarding dvdbackup: FTBFS: dvdbackup.c:1282:29: error: ‘ifo_handle_t’ {aka ‘struct ’} has no member named ‘file’ to be marked as

Bug#956211: marked as done (nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2 - FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 21:36:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#956211: fixed in gitlab 12.9.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #956211, regarding nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2 - FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit

Bug#955013: marked as done (src:boxer-data: fails to migrate to testing for too long)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 21:34:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#955013: fixed in boxer-data 10.8.12+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #955013, regarding src:boxer-data: fails to migrate to testing for too long to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#950221: salsa: Please transfer natsort from debian to python-team/modules

2020-04-10 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 15734 March 1977, Scott Talbert wrote: Hello again Salsa admins. Can you please transfer natsort to python-team/modules? I would like to get natsort fixed ASAP. https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/natsort -- bye, Joerg

Bug#956420: src:pynwb: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2020-04-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: pynwb Version: 0.5.1-2 Severity: serious Control: fixed -1 1.2.1-2 Tags: sid bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and

Processed: src:pynwb: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 1.2.1-2 Bug #956420 [src:pynwb] src:pynwb: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions pynwb/1.2.1-2. -- 956420: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956420 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#956419: src:speechd-el: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2020-04-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: speechd-el Version: 2.8-2.1 Severity: serious Control: fixed -1 2.9-1 Tags: sid bullseye pending User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing

Processed: src:speechd-el: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 2.9-1 Bug #956419 [src:speechd-el] src:speechd-el: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions speechd-el/2.9-1. -- 956419: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956419 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#956288: Problems identified in debian/copyright

2020-04-10 Thread Thomas Lange
Hi Michael, thanks for your proposal. I've patched the copyright file and uploaded a new version. I left this part unchanged, since it's a different license which is different to the license for Files: * Files: install/dracut-install.c Copyright: (C) 2012 Harald Hoyer (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc.

Processed: sipxtapi: diff for NMU version 3.3.0~test17-3.1

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 954547 + patch Bug #954547 [src:sipxtapi] sipxtapi: FTBFS: os/linux/OsTaskLinux.cpp:52:19: error: ‘int gettid()’ was declared ‘extern’ and later ‘static’ [-fpermissive] Added tag(s) patch. > tags 954547 + pending Bug #954547 [src:sipxtapi] sipxtapi: FTBFS:

Bug#954547: sipxtapi: diff for NMU version 3.3.0~test17-3.1

2020-04-10 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Control: tags 954547 + patch Control: tags 954547 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for sipxtapi (versioned as 3.3.0~test17-3.1) and uploaded it to mentors for sponsoring. Please feel free to tell me if I should remove it. -- Regards Sudip diff -Nru

Bug#956211: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956211: Bug#956211: [Re: nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2]

2020-04-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le ven. 10 avr. 2020 à 21:15, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > Control: reassign -1 gitlab > Control: tags -1 -wontfix > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 12:32 am, Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 8:58 pm, Jérémy Lal > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Le ven. 10 avr. 2020 à 20:50, Pirate

Bug#956229: marked as done (FTBFS: test failures)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 19:48:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#956229: fixed in libtickit-widget-floatbox-perl 0.06-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #956229, regarding FTBFS: test failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#871563: Downgrading severity of manpages-fr-extra bug

2020-04-10 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
control: severity -1 important Hi, I'm downgrading this bug to allow the NMU of manpages-fr-extra to migrate to testing. The latest upload replaces the previous package with a transitional dummy package which depends on manpages-fr and manpages-fr-dev. Those packages are now generated from the

Processed: Downgrading severity of manpages-fr-extra bug

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #871563 [manpages-fr-extra] manpages-fr-extra outdated Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 871563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871563 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#952103: marked as done (svnkit: FTBFS: [javac] /<>/svnkit-javahl16/src/main/java/org/apache/subversion/javahl/SVNClient.java:14: error: SVNClient is not abstract and does not over

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 19:24:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#952103: fixed in svnkit 1.8.14-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #952103, regarding svnkit: FTBFS: [javac] /<>/svnkit-javahl16/src/main/java/org/apache/subversion/javahl/SVNClient.java:14: error:

Bug#956385: marked as done (node-request: uses internet access during build)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 19:23:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#956385: fixed in node-request 2.88.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #956385, regarding node-request: uses internet access during build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#956211: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956211: Bug#956211: [Re: nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2]

2020-04-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reassign -1 gitlab Control: tags -1 -wontfix On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 12:32 am, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 8:58 pm, Jérémy Lal wrote: Le ven. 10 avr. 2020 à 20:50, Pirate Praveen  a écrit : On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:35 pm, Jérémy Lal wrote: >

Processed: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956211: Bug#956211: [Re: nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2]

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 gitlab Bug #956211 [nodejs] nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2 - FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory Bug reassigned from package 'nodejs' to 'gitlab'. No longer

Processed: severity of 955019 is grave, severity of 955020 is grave, severity of 951537 is grave

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # rasing severity to RC as package orphaned and should not be included with > these open security fixes for bullseye > severity 955019 grave Bug #955019 [src:php-horde-trean] php-horde-trean: CVE-2020-8865 Severity set to 'grave' from

Bug#956211: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956211: [Re: nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2]

2020-04-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 8:58 pm, Jérémy Lal wrote: Le ven. 10 avr. 2020 à 20:50, Pirate Praveen a écrit : On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:35 pm, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Package: nodejs > Version: 10.19.0~dfsg-3 > Followup-For: Bug #956211 > > Pirate, i repeat, please try > > webpack

Bug#956211: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956211: [Re: nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2]

2020-04-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le ven. 10 avr. 2020 à 20:50, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:35 pm, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > Package: nodejs > > Version: 10.19.0~dfsg-3 > > Followup-For: Bug #956211 > > > > Pirate, i repeat, please try > > > > webpack --max-old-space-size=4096 > > > > Or even a higher

Processed: Bug#956385 marked as pending in node-request

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #956385 [src:node-request] node-request: uses internet access during build Added tag(s) pending. -- 956385: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956385 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#956385: marked as pending in node-request

2020-04-10 Thread Xavier Guimard
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #956385 in node-request reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#952103 marked as pending in svnkit

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #952103 [src:svnkit] svnkit: FTBFS: [javac] /<>/svnkit-javahl16/src/main/java/org/apache/subversion/javahl/SVNClient.java:14: error: SVNClient is not abstract and does not override abstract method

Bug#952103: marked as pending in svnkit

2020-04-10 Thread Tony Mancill
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #952103 in svnkit reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#956211: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956211: [Re: nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2]

2020-04-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:35 pm, Jérémy Lal wrote: Package: nodejs Version: 10.19.0~dfsg-3 Followup-For: Bug #956211 Pirate, i repeat, please try webpack --max-old-space-size=4096 Or even a higher value. If it works, it's up to gitlab to use that flag.

Bug#956405: ruby-enumerable-statistics: FTBFS on amd64/unstable: find: [..] No such file or directory

2020-04-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: ruby-enumerable-statistics Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Tags: fbtfs Dear Maintainer, ruby-enumerable-statistics

Bug#951224: marked as done (securefs: autopkgtest regression: libutf8proc.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:50:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#951224: fixed in securefs 0.9.0+ds-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #951224, regarding securefs: autopkgtest regression: libutf8proc.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory to be

Processed: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956211: nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2 - FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 help Bug #956211 [nodejs] nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2 - FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory Added tag(s) help. -- 956211:

Bug#956211: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#956211: nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2 - FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap ou

2020-04-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: tag -1 help On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:08 pm, Jérémy Lal wrote: Tags: wontfix Le mer. 8 avr. 2020 à 15:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit : Package: nodejs Version: 10.19.0~dfsg-3 Severity: grave Control: notfound -1 12.13.1~dfsg-1 nodejs 10 crashed (retried again) and on the same

Bug#950221: salsa: Please transfer natsort from debian to python-team/modules

2020-04-10 Thread Scott Talbert
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020, Adrian Bunk wrote: Hi, please transfer natsort from debian to python-team/modules, see #950221 for background. Hello again Salsa admins. Can you please transfer natsort to python-team/modules? I would like to get natsort fixed ASAP. Thanks, Scott

Processed: retitle 956400 to qpdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs libatomic

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 956400 qpdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs libatomic Bug #956400 [src:qpdf] pdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs libatomic Changed Bug title to 'qpdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs

Bug#956211: [Re: nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2]

2020-04-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: nodejs Version: 10.19.0~dfsg-3 Followup-For: Bug #956211 Pirate, i repeat, please try webpack --max-old-space-size=4096 Or even a higher value. If it works, it's up to gitlab to use that flag. Nodejs applications using high memory must use that kind of workaround. Jérémy. -- System

Processed: retitle 956400 to pdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs libatomic

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 956400 pdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs libatomic Bug #956400 [src:qpdf] pdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs libatomic Ignoring request to change the title of bug#956400 to the same title > thanks

Processed: plans for uploading a newer icu to unstable

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 956211 by -1 Bug #956211 [nodejs] nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2 - FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory 956211 was not blocked by any bugs. 956211 was not blocking

Bug#954637: marked as done (ivtools: FTBFS: os_stropts.h:56:17: fatal error: stropts.h: No such file or directory)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 18:18:17 +0100 with message-id <20200410171817.o5famn57ja5hyb4v@debian> and subject line Re: ivtools: FTBFS: os_stropts.h:56:17: fatal error: stropts.h: No such file or directory has caused the Debian Bug report #954637, regarding ivtools: FTBFS:

Bug#956400: pdf: FTBFS on multiple 32-bit architectures, needs libatomic

2020-04-10 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Source: qpdf Version: 10.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: armel Hi! qpdf fails to build from source on multiple architectures due to missing symbols from libatomic [1]: /usr/bin/ld: /<>/libqpdf/build/.libs/libqpdf.so: undefined reference

Bug#936273: marked as done (capstone: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:03:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#936273: fixed in capstone 4.0.1+really+3.0.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #936273, regarding capstone: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: reproduced the error on buster (backports/fasttrack) as well

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 956211 10.15.2~dfsg-2 Bug #956211 [nodejs] nodejs 10 segfaults when running webpack on gitlab 12.9.2 - FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory Marked as found in versions

Bug#936273: marked as pending in capstone

2020-04-10 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #936273 in capstone reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#936273 marked as pending in capstone

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #936273 [src:capstone] capstone: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 936273: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936273 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#938595: marked as done (sugar-toolkit-gtk3: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 16:35:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#938595: fixed in sugar-toolkit-gtk3 0.116-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #938595, regarding sugar-toolkit-gtk3: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#942469: marked as done (r-cran-rmarkdown: directory to symlink conversion not correctly handled on upgrade)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 16:35:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#942469: fixed in r-cran-rmarkdown 2.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #942469, regarding r-cran-rmarkdown: directory to symlink conversion not correctly handled on upgrade to be marked as done. This

Bug#956393: rust-unicode-width: uninstallable featureset packages.

2020-04-10 Thread peter green
Source: rust-unicode-width Version: 0.1.7-1 Severity: serious librust-unicode-width+std-dev and librust-unicode-width+rustc-dep-of-std-dev are not installable as they depend on librust-rustc-std-workspace-std-1+default-dev which does not seem to exist in debian. This is blocking the

Processed: bug 938432 is forwarded to https://github.com/rigred/sandsifter/issues/10

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 938432 https://github.com/rigred/sandsifter/issues/10 Bug #938432 [src:sandsifter] sandsifter: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/rigred/sandsifter/issues/10'. > thanks Stopping

Bug#955997: rust-libc: autopkgtest failure.

2020-04-10 Thread peter green
notfound 955997 0.22-6-1 found 955997 0.2.66-1 found 955997 0.2.68-1 thanks The autopkgtest is still failing with rust-libc 0.2.68-1 and rustc 1.42-1 Is it possible to enable/disable (or make non-fatal) autopkgtests on a per-featureset basis? if so should the test for the "dep-of-std"

Processed: re: rust-libc: autopkgtest failure.

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 955997 0.22-6-1 Bug #955997 [rust-libc] rust-libc: autopkgtest failure. There is no source info for the package 'rust-libc' at version '0.22-6-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '0.22-6-1' No longer

Bug#953487: fixed in runescape 0.7-1

2020-04-10 Thread Carlos Donizete Froes
Hi Markus, I hope everything is fine with you and your family. > I had uploaded the new version of runescape to fix bug 953487 because > you stated in > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953487#25 > > that the package has been whitelisted. Apparently this is not the case >

Processed: Re: ldns: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #936832 [src:ldns] ldns: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 936832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936832 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#936832: ldns: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-04-10 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
Control: tags -1 + pending On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:22:47 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:ldns > Version: 1.7.0-4 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: py2removal > > Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove >

Bug#956159: Package depends on python-glade2 python-gtk2, which are no longer in sid

2020-04-10 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2020-04-08 06:34:18 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: wicd-gtk > Severity: critical > Version: 1.7.4+tb2-6 > > Package depends on python-glade2 python-gtk2, which are no longer in sid. I suppose that this is related to bug 885140.

Bug#956385: node-request: uses internet access during build

2020-04-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Source: node-request Version: 2.88.1-3 Severity: serious Hello, looks like the dh_auto_test process is trying to go on internet, and this is forbidden by policy. I found this problem on Ubuntu builders, where the internet access is more strictly forbidden. [...] not ok 549 should be equal

Processed: genwqe-user: diff for NMU version 4.0.18-3.1

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 954611 + patch Bug #954611 [src:genwqe-user] genwqe-user: FTBFS: hw_defs.h:36:21: error: static declaration of ‘gettid’ follows non-static declaration Added tag(s) patch. > tags 954611 + pending Bug #954611 [src:genwqe-user] genwqe-user: FTBFS:

Bug#954611: genwqe-user: diff for NMU version 4.0.18-3.1

2020-04-10 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Control: tags 954611 + patch Control: tags 954611 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for genwqe-user (versioned as 4.0.18-3.1) and uploaded it to mentors for sponsoring. Please feel free to tell me if I should remove it. -- Regards Sudip diff -Nru

Bug#955535: Bug #955535: httping: flaky autopkgtest: PING google.com:80

2020-04-10 Thread Abhijith PA
Hi Aron On 03/04/20 7:24 am, Aron Xu wrote: > Hi, > > The two different results are caused by different CI workers - some of > our workers at ci.d.n does not have reliable network to public > services, in this case to google.com:80, which makes the test result > flaky. > > Would you mind to

Bug#955535: httping: flaky autopkgtest: PING google.com:80

2020-04-10 Thread Abhijith PA
Thanks for reporting. On 02/04/20 12:26 pm, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Source: httping > Version: 2.5-5 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: flaky > > The test for httping passed on amd64[0] and failed on arm64[1]. Looking > at the

Bug#956339: marked as done (unattended-upgrades: regression: packages with conffile prompts are no longer skipped, leading to upgrade failures)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 21:28:19 +0800 with message-id <0268f4dc7ec88e40d4161bd2247164d00e3d32da.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#956339: unattended-upgrades: regression: packages with conffile prompts are no longer skipped, leading to upgrade failures has caused the Debian

Bug#936572: marked as done (fusil: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:23:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#956327: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #936572, regarding fusil: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#937447: marked as done (pygobject-2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:23:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#930138: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #937447, regarding pygobject-2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#955541: marked as done (Login fails for a user name with non-ascii characters)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:35:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#955541: fixed in systemd 245.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #955541, regarding Login fails for a user name with non-ascii characters to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Bug#955541 marked as pending in systemd

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #955541 [systemd] Login fails for a user name with non-ascii characters Added tag(s) pending. -- 955541: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955541 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#955541: marked as pending in systemd

2020-04-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #955541 in systemd reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#956365: redmine: unmet dependencies

2020-04-10 Thread Dragos Jarca
Package: redmine Version: 4.0.6-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I use both gitlab and redmine. When upgraded gitlab to 12.8.8-x, redmine was uninstalled because of unmet dependencies, and cannot be reinstalled. apt-get install redmine Reading

Processed: closing 956266

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 956266 1.42.0+dfsg1-1 Bug #956266 [rustc] rustc: build-depends-indep on old version of wasi-libc There is no source info for the package 'rustc' at version '1.42.0+dfsg1-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version

Bug#956266: closing 956266

2020-04-10 Thread Ximin Luo
close 956266 1.42.0+dfsg1-1 thanks

Bug#955606: marked as done (gxr: FTBFS with gulkan 0.14)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:34:29 +0200 with message-id <96e5a7c0-f187-ea86-ccdb-d988198c6...@debian.org> and subject line Re: gxr: FTBFS with gulkan 0.14 has caused the Debian Bug report #955606, regarding gxr: FTBFS with gulkan 0.14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#956277: marked as done (wifite's autopkg tests depend on pyrit)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:21:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#956277: fixed in wifite 2.5.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #956277, regarding wifite's autopkg tests depend on pyrit to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#956277: marked as pending in wifite

2020-04-10 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #956277 in wifite reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#956277 marked as pending in wifite

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #956277 [src:wifite] wifite's autopkg tests depend on pyrit Added tag(s) pending. -- 956277: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956277 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#953487: fixed in runescape 0.7-1

2020-04-10 Thread Markus Koschany
I suggest we wait a little for a response from non-f...@buildd.debian.org before we make another upload. However if there is no response in two weeks, we can just proceed by making a binary upload of runescape. Bug #956275 can be resolved by replacing the runescape.png icon. The license is most

Bug#953487: fixed in runescape 0.7-1

2020-04-10 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello Carlos, I had uploaded the new version of runescape to fix bug 953487 because you stated in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953487#25 that the package has been whitelisted. Apparently this is not the case hence I am writing to non-f...@buildd.debian.org again and I

Bug#956110: marked as done (sabnzbdplus: Depends on cruft packages)

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:49:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#956110: fixed in sabnzbdplus 3.0.0~0git20200408+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #956110, regarding sabnzbdplus: Depends on cruft packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: openafs-modules-dkms: piuparts failure on package installation

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 953709 by -1 Bug #953709 {Done: Benjamin Kaduk } [src:openafs] src:openafs: fails to migrate to testing for too long 953709 was not blocked by any bugs. 953709 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 953709: 956358 -- 953709:

Processed: block 953720 with 951306

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 953720 with 951306 Bug #953720 [src:snek] src:snek: fails to migrate to testing for too long 953720 was not blocked by any bugs. 953720 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 953720: 951306 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#956358: openafs-modules-dkms: piuparts failure on package installation

2020-04-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openafs-modules-dkms Version: 1.8.6~pre1-3 Severity: serious Control: block 953709 by -1 https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/o/openafs.html ... Loading new openafs-1.8.6pre1 DKMS files... It is likely that 4.19.0-8-amd64 belongs to a chroot's host Building for 5.4.0-4-amd64

Processed: closing 949983

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 949983 Bug #949983 [src:python-apt] python-apt: Build-Depends on pep8 which has been removed Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 949983:

Processed: Re: don't explicitly request python 3.7 for the build

2020-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #951829 [src:openvdb] python3-openvdb: build against the default python3 version Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -- 951829: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951829 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#951829: don't explicitly request python 3.7 for the build

2020-04-10 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Control: severity -1 normal On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:57 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Control: reopen -1 7.0.0-1 > Control: retitle -1 python3-openvdb: build against the default python3 version > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:10:49 +0100 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + patch

  1   2   >