Package: cloud-init
Version: 20.2
Severity: Serious
The version of package cloud-init in official repository of Debian 10.9 is 20.2.
This version 20.2 is far behind the latest released version 21.2.
Please check https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init
With cloud-init version >=21.1, we can
Sebastian Ramacher a écrit le 16/06/2021 à 17:22 :
Thanks for uploading the fix!
Unfortunately, the changes to the S3 virtual file driver caused
regressions in hdf5's reverse dependencies (some of them are caused by
missing dependencies for -lcrypto and -lcurl). See
Hi all,
> Indeed. Using a clean Sid chroot, installing webext-browserpass from
> Buster and then upgrading does not exhibit this issue.
I tried with a stable chroot, then installed all the webext* packages you have
installed and then upgraded webext-browserpass. Works like a charm.
> Good
Now Debian has a release with a useful package missing. What ever
happened to orphaning a package if you didn't want to maintain it anymore?
I certainly see nothing that make the claim that it isn't suitable for
release justified. It is working very well and does not appear to have
any serious
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:yara 4.1.0~rc2-1
Bug #987378 [src:yara, src:golang-github-hillu-go-yara] yara breaks
golang-github-hillu-go-yara autopkgtest + ftbfs
Bug reassigned from package 'src:yara, src:golang-github-hillu-go-yara' to
'src:yara'.
No longer marked as found in
Control: reassign -1 src:yara 4.1.0~rc2-1
Control: tags -1 = ftbfs
Control: affects -1 golang-github-hillu-go-yara
Control: retitle -1 yara causes ftbfs of + autopktest regression in
golang-github-hillu-go-yara
Hi Hilko,
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:53:52 +0200 Hilko Bengen
wrote:> Done, see above.
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#980047: fixed in libpam-chroot 0.9-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #980047,
regarding libpam-chroot: pam_chroot.so installed in wrong directory on amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Dear Adrian,
Thank you for preparing the NMU but please cancel it. I have just uploaded
version 0.9-5 to unstable to fix the RC bugs.
Sorry for the delay.
Best regards,
Javier
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 13:48, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 980047 + patch
> Control: tags 980047 + pending
>
Hi
On 2021-06-14 20:21:05, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Beckmann a écrit le 14/06/2021 à 10:18 :
> > On 08/06/2021 13.05, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > Here it is. Now testing upgrades ...
> > > > There were some new symbols ... but they appeared independently of my
> >
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:49:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#971572: fixed in oclgrind 19.10-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #971572,
regarding oclgrind appears to depend on libclang-common-9-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On 16/06/2021 13.48, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:31:39PM -0400, ryan wrote:
fatal error: malformed or corrupted AST file: 'could not find file
'/usr/lib/llvm-9/lib/clang/9.0.1/include/opencl-c-base.h' referenced by AST file
Package: poedit
Version: 3.0-5
Severity: serious
poedit has a file conflict with other buggy packages shipping the
icon-theme.cache, too
Andreas
Processing control commands:
> tags 988715 + patch
Bug #988715 [atmel-firmware] atmel-firmware: triggers lintian autoreject tag
'file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile'
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 988715 + pending
Bug #988715 [atmel-firmware] atmel-firmware: triggers lintian autoreject tag
Control: tags 988715 + patch
Control: tags 988715 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for atmel-firmware (versioned as 1.3-4.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -u atmel-firmware-1.3/debian/rules
On 2021-06-16 15:01:35, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2021-05-18 15:45:52, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>...
>> > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/bogus-mail-host
>> >
>> > E Uploaders anar...@koumbit.og
>>
>> Thanks for catching this. I
Removing an useful and stable software such as rsnapshot is not a good idea,
IMHO.
--
Fabio "Kurgan" Muzzi
- IZ4UFQ -
"Il massimo danno con il minimo sforzo"
Processing control commands:
> tags 988713 + pending
Bug #988713 [pipemeter] pipemeter: triggers lintian autoreject tag
'FSSTND-dir-in-usr'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
988713: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988713
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags 988713 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pipemeter (versioned as 1.1.5-1.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru pipemeter-1.1.5/debian/changelog pipemeter-1.1.5/debian/changelog
---
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:33:50AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2021-05-18 15:45:52, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>...
> > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/bogus-mail-host
> >
> > E Uploaders anar...@koumbit.og
>
> Thanks for catching this. I haven't used that email address in a long
> time now,
Processing control commands:
> tags 971897 + patch
Bug #971897 [python3-gpiozero] python3-gpiozero: Missing dependency/recommend
on python3-pkg-resources
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 971897 + pending
Bug #971897 [python3-gpiozero] python3-gpiozero: Missing dependency/recommend
on
Control: tags 971897 + patch
Control: tags 971897 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gpiozero (versioned as 1.4.1-1.3) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru gpiozero-1.4.1/debian/changelog
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:31:39PM -0400, ryan wrote:
>...
>* What led up to the situation?
>
> I was attempting to use oclgrind, but I found that using oclgrind and trying
> to
> compile an OpenCL program resulted in unexpected output from
> clGetProgramBuildInfo():
>
> ```
> fatal error:
Processing control commands:
> tags 980047 + patch
Bug #980047 [libpam-chroot] libpam-chroot: pam_chroot.so installed in wrong
directory on amd64
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 980047 + pending
Bug #980047 [libpam-chroot] libpam-chroot: pam_chroot.so installed in wrong
directory on amd64
Added
Control: tags 980047 + patch
Control: tags 980047 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libpam-chroot (versioned as 0.9-4.4) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -u libpam-chroot-0.9/debian/changelog
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 936041 + wontfix
Bug #936041 [gnome-control-center] Add dependency for gnome-session
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> severity 936041 wishlist
Bug #936041 [gnome-control-center] Add dependency for gnome-session
Severity set to 'wishlist' from
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 09:02:00 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2021 23:42:57 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I see the Ogre package overrides the package-name-doesnt-match-sonames
> > lintian tag because it is really a bundle of multiple shared libraries
> >
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:10:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#968897: fixed in pylint 2.7.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #968897,
regarding src:pylint should provide a pylint3 transitional package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: python3-yaml
Version: 5.3.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'm trying to solve some incomplete upgrades from buster to bullseye.
I.e. apt tries to keep some obsolete packages from buster installed and
therefore cannot upgrade some other packages instead of removing the
obsolete
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.4.16-1
Severity: grave
This is currently run on testing since ages. I had to restart due to a changed
fingerprint and the global service started to fail with:
$ systemctl status fetchmail.service
● fetchmail.service - LSB: init-Script for system wide fetchmail
* Andreas Beckmann [2021-06-16 09:02]:
@Jochen: please bump the Breaks+Replaces to
libogre-1.12 (<< 1.12.10+dfsg2-3)
(or drop the version altogether) to also cover the version currently
in experimental. It's enough to fix this in git (and if you want
experimental which still has the old
On Sun, 13 Jun 2021 23:42:57 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote:
I see the Ogre package overrides the package-name-doesnt-match-sonames
lintian tag because it is really a bundle of multiple shared libraries
libOgreMain.so.1.12.10, libOgreOverlay.so.1.12.10 and so on, which were
presumably considered to
Hey!
This is now fixed in RC2 just tested :)
So this bug can be closed
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 8:00 AM Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Yeah, did not think about changing it to English, but yeah looks like it
> can be that, works in the text mode installer however
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 7:55 AM Cyril
32 matches
Mail list logo