Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 990428 bullseye-release-notes
Unknown tag/s: bullseye-release-notes.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream
pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was elb...@debian.org).
> tags 990428 bullseye-release-notes
Unknown tag/s: bullseye-release-notes.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo
Package: firefox
Version: 57.0.0
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 4.13
Forwarded: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1420286
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: tags -1 + security
Hi,
By default firefox does not allow symlink in
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + security
Bug #992150 [firefox] Please allow symlink in system extension
Added tag(s) security.
--
992150: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:51:09 -0400 Andres Salomon
wrote:
> So this only affects users who do or do not have the ssh metapackage
> installed?
I'm pretty sure it effects both.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Fri, 13 Aug 2021 14:22:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992088: fixed in wims 2:4.17b+svn13454~dfsg2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #992088,
regarding wims: contains two files with a non-free "disparaging to Sun" license
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 982122 https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/9369
Bug #982122 [src:redis] redis: experimental package OOMs s390x buildds
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/9369'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
forwarded 982122 https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/9369
thanks
Hi Julien,
> https://people.debian.org/~jcristau/redis_6.2.5-2_s390x-2021-08-11T16:17:34Z
This was very useful and, in conjunction with your suggestion of
potentially reproducing it on a porterbox, I have been able to
reproduce
On vrijdag 13 augustus 2021 13:42:33 CEST Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > Preface attempt 1:
> > Yesterday after downgrading to -4, I did a 'fakeroot debian/rules binary-
> > indep' and that succeeded successfully.
> >
> > Attempt 1:
> > After upgrading to -5, without running 'make clean' or
[ add bug-c...@gnu.org ]
[ add Salvatore Bonaccorso ]
On Fri, 2021-08-13 12:13:18 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Adding Salvatore in this loop as he is FAR more knowledgeable wrt kernel
> compilation then I am to rule out mistakes I made (I'm a noob).
>
> On vrijdag 13 augustus 2021 10:51:09
On Thu, 2021-08-12 16:18:02 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream patch
>
> I ran into this problem too at the exact same step of a kernel build.
> Upstream author responded with
> "Thanks. Fixed in dfc801c44a93bed7b3951905b188823d6a0432c8"
>
On Wed, 2021-08-11 16:25:01 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: cpio
> Version: 2.13+dfsg-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: regression, has influences to other programs, partially FTBFS
> of packages, and other impact
> X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
>
> Hi
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
