Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags #995212 security fixed upstream
Bug #995212 [chromium] chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)
Added tag(s) upstream, security, and fixed.
> severity #995212 critical
Bug #995212 [chromium] chromium: Update to version
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for reporting!
I've investigated this and found that the error comes from building
against a version of the package "cv_bridge" (libcv-bridge-dev) which
wasn't yet rebuilt against the latest opencv 4.5.4, but for the older
4.5.3.
Does this still qualify as a FTBFS error in
: 0.4.1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Aloha,
From looking up ci.debian.net [1], this q2cli issue seems
related to a recent upgrade of python-click 8.0.2.
[1]: https://ci.debian.net/packages/q/q2cli/testing/amd64/
The multiple failures are probably all related to the following
issue, which can be simply
Processing control commands:
> found -1 11.2.152~11.2.2-3
Bug #997031 [nvidia-cuda-gdb] nvidia-cuda-gdb: buster-backports
/usr/bin/cuda-gdb 'Segmentation fault' at startup
Marked as found in versions nvidia-cuda-toolkit/11.2.2-3.
> found -1 11.3.109~11.3.1-4
Bug #997031 [nvidia-cuda-gdb]
Control: found -1 11.2.152~11.2.2-3
Control: found -1 11.3.109~11.3.1-4
Control: retitle -1 nvidia-cuda-gdb: cuda-gdb 'Segmentation fault' at startup
if libpython2.7 is installed
On 22/10/2021 19.11, Tim Trant wrote:
"gdb /usr/bin/cuda-gdb" and "strings /usr/bin/cuda-gdb" suggest that there's
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Greetings,
Lucas Nussbaum, on 2021-10-23:
> > Failure: ImportError (cannot import name 'MapperExtension' from
> > 'sqlalchemy.orm.interfaces'
> > (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/interfaces.py)) ... ERROR
This one has the same symptom as the autopkgtest
I have now 'patched' the upstream setting of GSL_AGE, this results (as kindly
analysed by Sebastian) in new sonames '26' so I prepared a new version which
just went out to unstable.
Unless I am mistaken, I need to get the release team on board for a proper
transition. Correct?
Dirk
--
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 21:53:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I suspect that applying the change from
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gstreamermm/-/merge_requests/4 in
> gstreamermm-1.0 would allow lordsawar to be built successfully against it
> (test-builds in progress).
Yes, confirmed via a
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 22:48:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#995968: fixed in gkrellm-leds 0.8.0-1.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #995968,
regarding gkrellm-leds: This gkrellm plugin does not start, Error: undefined
symbol: XTestFakeKeyEvent
to be marked as done.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #997488 [src:q2cli] q2cli: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
997488: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997488
Debian Bug
The line causing the error message can safely be removed as it is
redundant. The correction appears in the most recent stable release, 3.2.0
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, 16:24 Lucas Nussbaum, wrote:
> Source: lives
> Version: 3.0.2-1.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2021 00:21:38 +0200
with message-id
and subject line sundials hypre
has caused the Debian Bug report #997275,
regarding sundials: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lHYPRE_core
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Control: Forwarded -1
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/cabvffennj8jkp7etuutqi+vkjdbfu37w1uxe4q3cb7-ixxh...@mail.gmail.com/
On Saturday, 23 October 2021 23:29:21 CEST Daniel Black wrote:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-block=163489378723217=2
Looked up your upstream message on lore.k.o and set
Processing control commands:
> Forwarded -1
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/cabvffennj8jkp7etuutqi+vkjdbfu37w1uxe4q3cb7-ixxh...@mail.gmail.com/
Bug #996951 [src:linux] linux-image-5.14.0-3-amd64: iouring looses requests
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2021 00:23:57 +0200
with message-id <08f39ab1-35cb-e1c7-5dd4-24fcae5d3...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#997270: ovn: FTBFS: | ./conftest.c:48: undefined
reference to `pow'
has caused the Debian Bug report #997270,
regarding ovn: FTBFS: | ./conftest.c:48:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Fsck usrmerge!
> tags 997507 + pending
Bug #997507 [src:unburden-home-dir] unburden-home-dir: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
error: make -j4 test returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 997275 5.8.0+dfsg-1~exp1
Bug #997275 [src:sundials] sundials: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lHYPRE_core
The source 'sundials' and version '5.8.0+dfsg-1~exp1' do not appear to match
any binary packages
Marked as fixed in versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Fsck usrmerge!
> tags 997507 + confirmed
Bug #997507 [src:unburden-home-dir] unburden-home-dir: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
error: make -j4 test returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 22:18:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997146: fixed in beautifulsoup4 4.10.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #997146,
regarding beautifulsoup4: FTBFS: error in beautifulsoup4 setup command:
use_2to3 is invalid.
to be marked as done.
This
23.10.2021 19:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: qemu
Version: 1:6.1+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 22:10:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997107: fixed in xiphos 4.2.1+dfsg1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #997107,
regarding xiphos: FTBFS: type_traits:44:3: error: template with C linkage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943274
> forwarded 997628
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/util/cf/-/merge_requests/2
Bug #997628 [xutils-dev] imake: uses “ar clq” by default, which recent binutils
broke in an
Oh, hold on! I'm not sure I have the same definition of "ipv6
only" as the buildd. Mine involves not having ipv4 loopback at
all, which does not raise the issue documented in the bug
report, but tornado errors on binding to 127.0.0.1 instead.
If my ipv6 only host gets back an ipv4 loopback,
: libbenchmark-timer-perl
Version: 0.7112-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
# imake
reassign 997628 xutils-dev
found 997628 1:7.7+5
retitle 997628 imake: uses “ar clq” by default, which recent binutils broke in
an incompatible way
# causes an FTBFS, cannot be workarounded in mgp
affects 997628 src:mgp
# root bug is in binutils
block 997628 by 981072
# at least, if not
: libfilehandle-unget-perl
Version: 0.1634-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_install
&g
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 21:49:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997190: fixed in qrq 0.3.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #997190,
regarding qrq: FTBFS: qrq.c:1073:31: error: format not a string literal and no
format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 997650 xtel
Bug #997650 [xutils-dev] xtel: FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once
Added indication that 997650 affects xtel
> merge 994276 997650
Bug #994276 [xutils-dev] xutils-dev: imake shouldn't pass l to ar
Bug #997650
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #997508 [src:libbenchmark-timer-perl] libbenchmark-timer-perl: FTBFS:
dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 test TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
997508: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997508
Debian Bug
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997508 in libbenchmark-timer-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 21:36:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997332: fixed in sitecopy 1:0.16.6-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #997332,
regarding sitecopy: FTBFS: configure: error: could not use external neon library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 21:36:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#996795: fixed in silversearcher-ag-el 0.48-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #996795,
regarding silversearcher-ag-el: should drop dependencies on elpa-dash-functional
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 23 Oct 2021 21:36:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#996620: fixed in wp2latex 3.100+ds-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #996620,
regarding FTBFS: error: cannot bind non-const lvalue reference of type
‘temp_string&’ to an rvalue of type ‘temp_string’
to be
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997515 in libfilehandle-unget-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #997515 [src:libfilehandle-unget-perl] libfilehandle-unget-perl: FTBFS:
dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 test TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
997515: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997515
Debian Bug
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #997325 [src:python-sqlsoup] python-sqlsoup: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
997325: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997325
https://marc.info/?l=linux-block=163489378723217=2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 997650 xutils-dev
Bug #997650 [src:xtel] xtel: FTBFS: ar: libdeps specified more than once
Bug reassigned from package 'src:xtel' to 'xutils-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions xtel/3.3.0-24.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
Version: 1:2.5.0-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # It's probably preferable to reduce autorm range of effect
> # while assessing the situation on ipv6 only configuration
> # regarding the building of src:intake.
> reassign 997059 src:intake
Bug #997059 [python3-tornado] python3-tornado:
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Version: 8.11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: calibre
Version: 5.29.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: botan
Version: 2.18.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: earlyoom
Version: 1.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: cgreen
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: xfsprogs
Version: 5.13.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: diodon
Version: 1.11.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: caribou
Version: 0.4.21-7.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: billiard
Version: 3.6.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-ara
Version: 1.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: sparql-wrapper-python
Version: 1.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> d
Source: xtel
Version: 3.3.0-24
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: feedparser
Version: 5.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: pyvirtualdisplay
Version: 0.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: pystache
Version: 0.5.4-6.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: ssvnc
Version: 1.0.29-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: python-slimmer
Version: 0.1.30-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: ctwm
Version: 3.7-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: rnc2rng
Version: 2.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: jquery-tablesorter
Version: 1:2.31.3+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: knews
Version: 1.0b.1-33
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: pybluez
Version: 0.23-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: python-keepalive
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: nas
Version: 1.9.4-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: python-oauth
Version: 1.0.1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: koules
Version: 1.4-27
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: flask-openid
Version: 1.2.5+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: python-rdflib-jsonld
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: behave
Version: 1.2.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: python-tempita
Version: 0.5.2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: pycallgraph
Version: 1.1.3-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: pygithub
Version: 1.43.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: pyraf
Version: 2.1.15-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: mgp
Version: 1.13a+upstream20090219-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl4-20
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: django-restricted-resource
Version: 2016.8-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-jquery
Version: 3.5.1+dfsg+~3.5.5-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: python-defer
Version: 1.0.6-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: funcparserlib
Version: 0.3.6+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: kinput2
Version: 3.1-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: fvwm1
Version: 1.24r-57
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: python-dexml
Version: 0.5.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: python-jsmin
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: python-mailer
Version: 0.8.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: twofish
Version: 0.3-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: python-anyjson
Version: 0.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: troffcvt
Version: 1.04-25
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: python-parse-type
Version: 0.3.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: blessings
Version: 1.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: wnn6-sdk
Version: 1.0.0-18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Enter
Source: vatnumber
Version: 1:1.2-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: suds
Version: 0.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: deap
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: easyprocess
Version: 0.2.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: python-fudge
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: simpleeval
Version: 0.9.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: pprofile
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: x2gobroker
Version: 0.0.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
1 - 100 of 696 matches
Mail list logo
