Bug#1036250: trapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure: FTBFS in testing: MDCAccessLogConverter.java:54: error: cannot access HttpServletRequest

2023-05-18 Thread Jérôme Charaoui
Control: tags -1 confirmed help Hello, This bug, as well as bug #1034855, have a common cause. The latest upload of src:logback, version 1:1.2.11-2, added a large patchset to migrate its dependencies from tomcat9 to tomcat10. When attempting to build this package with the previous version

Processed: Re: trapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure: FTBFS in testing: MDCAccessLogConverter.java:54: error: cannot access HttpServletRequest

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed help Bug #1036250 [src:trapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure] trapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure: FTBFS in testing: MDCAccessLogConverter.java:54: error: cannot access HttpServletRequest Added tag(s) help and confirmed. -- 1036250:

Bug#1036239: marked as done (curl: CVE-2023-28319 CVE-2023-28320 CVE-2023-28321 CVE-2023-28322)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 23:04:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036239: fixed in curl 7.88.1-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #1036239, regarding curl: CVE-2023-28319 CVE-2023-28320 CVE-2023-28321 CVE-2023-28322 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#999111: marked as done (webmagick: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:54:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036267: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999111, regarding webmagick: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means

Bug#897397: marked as done (webmagick: Use of defined on aggregates is no longer supported)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:54:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036267: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #897397, regarding webmagick: Use of defined on aggregates is no longer supported to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#867261: marked as done (tldp FTBFS with Python 3.6 as supported Python version)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:53:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036241: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #867261, regarding tldp FTBFS with Python 3.6 as supported Python version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#999202: marked as done (ipkungfu: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:53:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036201: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999202, regarding ipkungfu: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means

Bug#965599: marked as done (ipkungfu: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:53:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036201: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965599, regarding ipkungfu: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#863263: marked as done (ipkungfu: script makes unsupported calls)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:53:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036201: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #863263, regarding ipkungfu: script makes unsupported calls to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#999220: marked as done (labrea: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:52:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036199: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999220, regarding labrea: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#998992: marked as done (libsnmp-multi-perl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:52:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036198: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #998992, regarding libsnmp-multi-perl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done.

Bug#979304: marked as done (src:libsnmp-multi-perl: invalid maintainer addres)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:52:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036198: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #979304, regarding src:libsnmp-multi-perl: invalid maintainer addres to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#965683: marked as done (libsnmp-multi-perl: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:52:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036198: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965683, regarding libsnmp-multi-perl: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means

Bug#965615: marked as done (labrea: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:52:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036199: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965615, regarding labrea: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#999270: marked as done (ez-ipupdate: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:51:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036195: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999270, regarding ez-ipupdate: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means

Bug#999258: marked as done (randomsound: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:51:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036196: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999258, regarding randomsound: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means

Bug#965796: marked as done (randomsound: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:51:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036196: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965796, regarding randomsound: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#965594: marked as done (initz: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:50:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036192: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965594, regarding initz: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#965512: marked as done (ez-ipupdate: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:51:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036195: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965512, regarding ez-ipupdate: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#965810: marked as done (scalapack-doc: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:47:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1003525: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965810, regarding scalapack-doc: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#999222: marked as done (thp: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036185: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999222, regarding thp: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#965506: marked as done (dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:49:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036186: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965506, regarding dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This

Bug#907308: marked as done (latrace: every program "killed by signal 11")

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:48:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036180: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #907308, regarding latrace: every program "killed by signal 11" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#882305: marked as done (libfinance-yahooquote-perl: yahooquote (and smtm) stopped working.)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:50:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036191: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #882305, regarding libfinance-yahooquote-perl: yahooquote (and smtm) stopped working. to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#890457: marked as done (latrace FTBFS with flex 2.6.4-2)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:48:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036180: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #890457, regarding latrace FTBFS with flex 2.6.4-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#868882: marked as done (libmyodbc: The package is not installable in Sid due to missing libmysqlclient18 dependency)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028325: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #868882, regarding libmyodbc: The package is not installable in Sid due to missing libmysqlclient18 dependency to be marked as done.

Bug#849630: marked as done (libmyodbc: Programs using it fails with floating point exeption, then connects to mariadb)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028325: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #849630, regarding libmyodbc: Programs using it fails with floating point exeption, then connects to mariadb to be marked as done.

Bug#852457: marked as done (myodbc: switch to build depend on the metapackage default-libmysqlclient-dev)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028325: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #852457, regarding myodbc: switch to build depend on the metapackage default-libmysqlclient-dev to be marked as done. This means

Bug#841561: marked as done (myodbc: FTBFS: stringutil.c:71:29: error: too few arguments to function 'my_malloc')

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028325: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #841561, regarding myodbc: FTBFS: stringutil.c:71:29: error: too few arguments to function 'my_malloc' to be marked as done. This

Bug#835166: marked as done (libmyodbc: SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception in sqlchar_as_sqlwchar)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:48:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028325: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #835166, regarding libmyodbc: SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception in sqlchar_as_sqlwchar to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#831952: marked as done (thp: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036185: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #831952, regarding thp: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot

Processed: tagging 1036279

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1036279 + pending Bug #1036279 [src:dokuwiki] XSS in RSS syntax Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1036279: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036279 Debian

Bug#1036298: marked as done (xen: CVE-2022-42336: XSA-431: Mishandling of guest SSBD selection on AMD hardware)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 22:55:48 +0200 with message-id <12210868.O9o76ZdvQC@eisbaer> and subject line Bug#1036298: fixed in xen 4.17.1+2-gb773c48e36-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1036298, regarding xen: CVE-2022-42336: XSA-431: Mishandling of guest SSBD selection on AMD hardware

Bug#1034842: marked as done (xen: CVE-2022-42335 (XSA-430))

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 20:46:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034842: fixed in xen 4.17.1+2-gb773c48e36-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034842, regarding xen: CVE-2022-42335 (XSA-430) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1036298: xen: CVE-2022-42336: XSA-431: Mishandling of guest SSBD selection on AMD hardware

2023-05-18 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: xen Version: 4.17.0+74-g3eac216e6e-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for xen. CVE-2022-42336[0]: | Mishandling of guest SSBD selection on AMD hardware The current logic | to set

Bug#1036279: XSS in RSS syntax

2023-05-18 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Moritz, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Severity: grave Thanks for the severity assessment by the security team. I wasn't really sure if this is RC or "just important". I've had a look at the new upstream tar balls, but the diff is unfortunately huge: $ tardiff dokuwiki-2022-07-31{a,b}.tgz -

Processed: affects 1036281

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1036281 darktable Bug #1036281 [src:libraw] libraw: CVE-2023-1729 Added indication that 1036281 affects darktable > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1036281:

Bug#1035654: non-essential adduser poses problems to purging packages

2023-05-18 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Nicolas Dandrimont (2023-05-18 20:51:04) > On Thu, May 18, 2023, at 10:03, Marc Haber wrote: > > adduser probably needs an additional hint because the new upload makes > > piuparts fail now, as discussed yesterday. > To work around this issue on the piuparts side, it sounds like we

Bug#1035654: non-essential adduser poses problems to purging packages

2023-05-18 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
On Thu, May 18, 2023, at 10:03, Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:24:39AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin > Rodrigues wrote: >> Marc, the same offer to you for your recent adduser upload to unstable. > > Yes, please. Thanks for your work. > > adduser probably needs an additional hint

Bug#1036255: python3-onelogin-saml2: FTBFS in testing: AssertionError: "Invalid issuer in the Logout Request" does not match "Could not validate timestamp: expired. Check system clock.)"

2023-05-18 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:01:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > == > > FAIL: testIsInvalidIssuer > > (tests.src.OneLogin.saml2_tests.logout_request_test.OneLogin_Saml2_Logout_Request_Test.testIsInvalidIssuer) > > Tests the

Bug#1036021: cadabra2,python3-notebook: undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notebook/static/components/codemirror

2023-05-18 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:14:38AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I noticed a suprising undeclared file conflict. While Andreas' tooling > finds most of these, it missed this one. It's about > /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notebook/static/components/codemirror. In > cadabra2, this is a directory.

Bug#1036101: marked as done (swtpm: FTBFS: Test timeout on mipsel)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 17:49:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036101: fixed in swtpm 0.7.1-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1036101, regarding swtpm: FTBFS: Test timeout on mipsel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: Re: swtpm: FTBFS: Test timeout on mipsel

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1036101 [src:swtpm] swtpm: FTBFS: Test timeout on mipsel Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1036101: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036101 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: ktexteditor: diff for NMU version 5.103.0-1.1

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1034951 + patch Bug #1034951 [ktexteditor-data] ktexteditor-data: missing Breaks+Replaces for libkf5texteditor-dev when upgrading from bullseye Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1034951 + pending Bug #1034951 [ktexteditor-data] ktexteditor-data: missing

Bug#1034951: ktexteditor: diff for NMU version 5.103.0-1.1

2023-05-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags 1034951 + patch Control: tags 1034951 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ktexteditor (versioned as 5.103.0-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. kind regards Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him,

Processed: Bump severities for policy violations

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1035784 serious Bug #1035784 [librocrand-dev] librocrand-dev: Missing Depends on libamdhip64-dev Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > severity 1035787 serious Bug #1035787 [libhiprand-dev] libhiprand-dev: Missing Depends on

Bug#999023: marked as done (plait: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 15:04:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999023: fixed in plait 1.6.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #999023, regarding plait: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#965781: marked as done (plait: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 15:04:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965781: fixed in plait 1.6.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #965781, regarding plait: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: tagging 1036278, tagging 1036279 ..., tagging 1036280, tagging 1036281 ..., tagging 1036282 ...

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1036278 + upstream Bug #1036278 [src:libpodofo] libpodofo: CVE-2023-31566 CVE-2023-31567 Added tag(s) upstream. > tags 1036279 + upstream Bug #1036279 [src:dokuwiki] XSS in RSS syntax Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded 1036279

Processed: rm

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1003525 RM: scalapack-doc -- RoQA; not useful; orphaned; RC-buggy Bug #1003525 [scalapack-doc] scalapack-doc: several releases behind scalapack Changed Bug title to 'RM: scalapack-doc -- RoQA; not useful; orphaned; RC-buggy' from

Bug#965782: marked as done (poco-doc: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 13:49:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965782: fixed in poco-doc 1.3.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #965782, regarding poco-doc: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#999047: marked as done (poco-doc: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 13:49:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999047: fixed in poco-doc 1.3.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #999047, regarding poco-doc: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1035844: matrix-sydent fails to purge without adduser

2023-05-18 Thread Hubert Chathi
On Wed, 17 May 2023 20:22:37 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues said: > Hi Hubert, Quoting Hubert Chathi (2023-05-17 00:43:00) >> On Tue, 16 May 2023 23:31:16 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues >> said: > since time is running short, I am going to >> NMU matrix-sydent on Thursday >

Bug#1036281: libraw: CVE-2023-1729

2023-05-18 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Source: libraw X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerability was published for libraw. CVE-2023-1729[0]: | A flaw was found in LibRaw. A heap-buffer-overflow in raw2image_ex() | caused by a maliciously crafted file may lead to an

Bug#957366: marked as done (intercal: ftbfs with GCC-10)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 13:18:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957366: fixed in intercal 30:0.30-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #957366, regarding intercal: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1036280: openjdk-11: CVE-2023-21930 CVE-2023-21937 CVE-2023-21938 CVE-2023-21939 CVE-2023-21954 CVE-2023-21967 CVE-2023-21968

2023-05-18 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Source: openjdk-11 X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for openjdk-11. CVE-2023-21930[0]: | Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition | product of Oracle Java SE (component: JSSE).

Bug#1036279: XSS in RSS syntax

2023-05-18 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Source: dokuwiki Version: 0.0.20220731.a-1 Severity: grave Tags: security X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team No CVE yet: https://huntr.dev/bounties/c6119106-1a5c-464c-94dd-ee7c5d0bece0/ https://github.com/dokuwiki/dokuwiki/pull/3967

Bug#957366: intercal: ftbfs with GCC-10

2023-05-18 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU to fix this.diff -Nru intercal-0.30/buildaux/Makefile.in intercal-0.30/buildaux/Makefile.in --- intercal-0.30/buildaux/Makefile.in 2023-05-18 15:11:21.0 +0200 +++ intercal-0.30/buildaux/Makefile.in 2015-04-02 18:30:18.582992990 +0200 @@ -1699,7 +1699,7 @@

Bug#1033823: marked as done (osmo-iuh: autopkgtest regression: test dependency no longer in unstable/testing)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 12:33:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1033823: fixed in osmo-iuh 1.3.0+dfsg1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1033823, regarding osmo-iuh: autopkgtest regression: test dependency no longer in unstable/testing to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1034921: colord-gtk: diff for NMU version 0.3.0-3.1

2023-05-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags 1034921 + patch Control: tags 1034921 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for colord-gtk (versioned as 0.3.0-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. kind regards Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr.

Processed: colord-gtk: diff for NMU version 0.3.0-3.1

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1034921 + patch Bug #1034921 [libcolord-gtk-headers] libcolord-gtk-headers: missing Breaks+Replaces for libcolord-gtk-dev when upgrading from bullseye Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1034921 + pending Bug #1034921 [libcolord-gtk-headers] libcolord-gtk-headers:

Processed: vdr-plugin-xineliboutput: diff for NMU version 2.2.0+git20211212-2.2

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1034915 + patch Bug #1034915 [xineliboutput-fbfe] xineliboutput-fbfe: missing Breaks+Replaces for xineliboutput-sxfe when upgrading from bullseye Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1034915 + pending Bug #1034915 [xineliboutput-fbfe] xineliboutput-fbfe: missing

Bug#1034915: vdr-plugin-xineliboutput: diff for NMU version 2.2.0+git20211212-2.2

2023-05-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags 1034915 + patch Control: tags 1034915 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for vdr-plugin-xineliboutput (versioned as 2.2.0+git20211212-2.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Kind regards Andreas -- `What a good

Bug#1036206: marked as done (ftbfs: error: not in a module on the module source path)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 12:03:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036206: fixed in javamail 1.6.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1036206, regarding ftbfs: error: not in a module on the module source path to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1035795: [Debian-astro-maintainers] Bug#1035795: libricohcamerasdk: does not ship SONAME link /usr/lib//libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so -> libRicohCameraSDKCpp.so.1.1.0

2023-05-18 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Andreas, On 09.05.23 12:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote: during a test with piuparts I noticed your package does not ship the SONAME link for its library (Policy 8.1). I am a bit at a loss here. If you look at the binary packages, libricocamerasdk contains: -rw-r--r-- root/root   1255128

Processed: flex: diff for NMU version 2.6.4-8.2

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1034931 + patch Bug #1034931 [libfl-dev] libfl-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces for flex-old when upgrading from bullseye Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1034931 + pending Bug #1034931 [libfl-dev] libfl-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces for flex-old when upgrading from

Bug#1034931: flex: diff for NMU version 2.6.4-8.2

2023-05-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags 1034931 + patch Control: tags 1034931 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for flex (versioned as 2.6.4-8.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. kind regards Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr.

Bug#1036272: youtube-dl - Should this be released with Bookworm?

2023-05-18 Thread Bastian Blank
Source: youtube-dl Version: 2021.12.17-2 Severity: serious We have a maintained and uptodate fork of this package in the archive and the release: yt-dlp. Do we really need to release this package in a not so usable state? Hint: transitional packages are supposed to be at the target of a

Bug#998985: marked as done (nslint: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 10:48:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#998985: fixed in nslint 3.0a2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #998985, regarding nslint: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#965749: marked as done (nslint: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 10:48:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965749: fixed in nslint 3.0a2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #965749, regarding nslint: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1036260: marked as done (freecontact: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: override_dh_install] Error 1)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 10:33:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1036260: fixed in freecontact 1.0.21-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1036260, regarding freecontact: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: override_dh_install] Error 1 to be marked as done.

Bug#999089: marked as done (nxcl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 10:18:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999089: fixed in nxcl 0.9-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #999089, regarding nxcl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#965751: marked as done (nxcl: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 10:18:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965751: fixed in nxcl 0.9-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #965751, regarding nxcl: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#965877: marked as done (wmcpu: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 10:02:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965877: fixed in wmcpu 1.4-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #965877, regarding wmcpu: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: reassign 1036253 to closure-compiler, forcibly merging 1036249 1036253, affects 1036253

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1036253 closure-compiler Bug #1036253 [src:mediaelement] mediaelement: FTBFS in testing: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '../build/mediaelement.min.js' Bug reassigned from package 'src:mediaelement' to

Processed: Bug#1036260 marked as pending in freecontact

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1036260 [src:freecontact] freecontact: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: override_dh_install] Error 1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1036260: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036260 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1036260: marked as pending in freecontact

2023-05-18 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1036260 in freecontact reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#965879: marked as done (wmdate: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 09:38:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965879: fixed in wmdate 0.7-4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #965879, regarding wmdate: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: forcibly merging 1034854 1036258

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1034854 1036258 Bug #1034854 {Done: David Prévot } [src:symfony] symfony: autopkgtest regression: "error:10800075:PKCS7 routines::certificate verify error". Bug #1034854 {Done: David Prévot } [src:symfony] symfony: autopkgtest

Processed: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1036260: freecontact: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: override_dh_install] Error 1

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed patch Bug #1036260 [src:freecontact] freecontact: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: override_dh_install] Error 1 Added tag(s) patch and confirmed. -- 1036260: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036260 Debian Bug

Bug#1036260: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1036260: freecontact: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: override_dh_install] Error 1

2023-05-18 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tags -1 + confirmed patch Good morning, This: >> d-shlibmove --commit \ >> --multiarch \ >> --exclude-la \ >> --devunversioned \ >> --v5 \ >> --override s/libgfortran[345]-dev/libgfortran-10-dev/ \

Bug#965877: wmcpu: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm

2023-05-18 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU to fix this.diff -Nru wmcpu-1.4/debian/changelog wmcpu-1.4/debian/changelog --- wmcpu-1.4/debian/changelog 2023-05-18 11:31:04.0 +0200 +++ wmcpu-1.4/debian/changelog 2023-05-18 11:23:38.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +wmcpu (1.4-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium + +

Bug#965879: wmdate: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm

2023-05-18 Thread Bastian Germann
I am uploading a NMU to fix this.diff -Nru wmdate-0.7/debian/changelog wmdate-0.7/debian/changelog --- wmdate-0.7/debian/changelog 2023-05-18 11:20:32.0 +0200 +++ wmdate-0.7/debian/changelog 2023-05-18 11:08:20.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +wmdate (0.7-4.2) unstable; urgency=medium +

Bug#1034367: marked as done (v2ray geoip data has problematic license)

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2023 08:19:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034367: fixed in golang-v2ray-core 4.34.0+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034367, regarding v2ray geoip data has problematic license to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1036265: Wifi deauthentications and complete connection loss with new packages: firmware-iwlwifi, firmware-realtek, firmware-misc-nonfree in version 20190114+really20220913-0+deb10u1

2023-05-18 Thread 255.255.255.255
Package: firmware-iwlwifi, firmware-realtek, firmware-misc-nonfree Version: 20190114+really20220913-0+deb10u1 Severity: Critical Kernel: 4.19.0-24-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.282-1 (2023-04-29) x86_64 GNU/Linux Wifi Adapter_1: 00:0c.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:31dc]

Bug#1034367: marked as pending in golang-v2ray-core

2023-05-18 Thread Roger Shimizu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1034367 in golang-v2ray-core reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#1034367 marked as pending in golang-v2ray-core

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1034367 [v2ray] v2ray geoip data has problematic license Added tag(s) pending. -- 1034367: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034367 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: forcibly merging 1036262 1036254 1036252 1036249

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1036262 1036254 1036252 1036249 Bug #1036262 [closure-compiler] ckeditor: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:24: debian/builddir/core/ckeditor_base.min.js] Error 254 Bug #1036254 [closure-compiler] datatables-extensions:

Bug#1035654: non-essential adduser poses problems to purging packages

2023-05-18 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:24:39AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Marc, the same offer to you for your recent adduser upload to unstable. Yes, please. Thanks for your work. adduser probably needs an additional hint because the new upload makes piuparts fail now, as discussed

Processed (with 1 error): affects 1036262, affects 1036254, affects 1036252, affects 1036249 ...

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1036262 ckeditor datatables-extensions jquery-i18n-properties > prettify.js Bug #1036262 [closure-compiler] ckeditor: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:24: debian/builddir/core/ckeditor_base.min.js] Error 254 Added indication

Processed (with 1 error): reassign 1036249 to closure-compiler, affects 1036249, merging 1036249 1036262

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1036249 closure-compiler Bug #1036249 [src:prettify.js] prettify.js: FTBFS in testing: make[2]: *** [Makefile:40: distrib.tstamp] Error 254 Bug reassigned from package 'src:prettify.js' to 'closure-compiler'. No longer marked as found

Processed (with 1 error): reassign 1036262 to closure-compiler, affects 1036262, reassign 1036254 to closure-compiler ...

2023-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1036262 closure-compiler Bug #1036262 [src:ckeditor] ckeditor: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:24: debian/builddir/core/ckeditor_base.min.js] Error 254 Bug reassigned from package 'src:ckeditor' to 'closure-compiler'. No

Bug#1036263: guestfs-tools: FTBFS in testing: make[6]: *** [Makefile:1716: test-suite.log] Error 1

2023-05-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: guestfs-tools Version: 1.48.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20230517 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1036257: udm: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:68: override_dh_auto_build] Error 2

2023-05-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: udm Version: 1.0.0.322-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20230517 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1036262: ckeditor: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:24: debian/builddir/core/ckeditor_base.min.js] Error 254

2023-05-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: ckeditor Version: 4.19.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20230517 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1036261: ruby-terser: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:13: override_dh_install] Error 1

2023-05-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: ruby-terser Version: 1.1.12+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20230517 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#1036260: freecontact: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: override_dh_install] Error 1

2023-05-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: freecontact Version: 1.0.21-12 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20230517 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1036259: moment-timezone.js: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:28: execute_before_dh_auto_configure] Error 1

2023-05-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: moment-timezone.js Version: 0.5.40+dfsg-1+2022g Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20230517 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant

Bug#1036256: golang-github-pin-tftp: FTBFS in testing: dh_auto_test: error: cd _build && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 github.com/pin/tftp github.com/pin/tftp/netascii returned exit code 1

2023-05-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: golang-github-pin-tftp Version: 2.2.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20230517 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#1036255: python3-onelogin-saml2: FTBFS in testing: AssertionError: "Invalid issuer in the Logout Request" does not match "Could not validate timestamp: expired. Check system clock.)"

2023-05-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: python3-onelogin-saml2 Version: 1.12.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20230517 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

  1   2   >