Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:55:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986740: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982034,
regarding forked-daapd: autopkgtest regression in testing: Job for
forked-daapd.service failed.
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:54:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053534: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957758,
regarding restbed: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:55:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#960425: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031173,
regarding arcanist-clang-format-linter: prevents arcanist tool from working
(PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error)
to be marked
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:55:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#986740: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004626,
regarding forked-daapd: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:52:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053376: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052768,
regarding lttnganalyses: FTBFS: AssertionError: '20:57:08.123456789' !=
'16:57:08.123456789'
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:47:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053315: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052836,
regarding firmware-tomu: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
libstdc++-arm-none-eabi-dev (= 15:12.2.rel1-1+23),
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:44:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053268: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052960,
regarding pgaudit-1.7: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:10: clean] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:38:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053152: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052876,
regarding bless: FTBFS: ../tests/meson.build:5:4: ERROR: Problem encountered:
nunit not found, cannot build tests. You can
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:32:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052295: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052237,
regarding FTBFS with OCaml 4.14.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:31:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052258: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #995847,
regarding paulstretch: Program crashes on Play or Render Selection - for debian
Bullseye and Bookworm
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:32:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052294: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052236,
regarding FTBFS with OCaml 4.14.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:31:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052293: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052231,
regarding FTBFS with OCaml 4.14.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:29:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052167: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052165,
regarding foo-yc20: Terminates directly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:21:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052478: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965451,
regarding cernlib: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:21:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052478: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957080,
regarding cernlib: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:21:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052478: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023171,
regarding cernlib: unsatisfiable dependency on geant321-doc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1051708: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965715,
regarding mclibs: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1051708: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957522,
regarding mclibs: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:18:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052242: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1043383,
regarding python-pcre: depends on obsolete pcre3 library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1053259 1.18.4-3
Bug #1053259 [src:gst-plugins-bad1.0] gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-40476
Marked as found in versions gst-plugins-bad1.0/1.18.4-3.
> found 1053260 1.18.4-3
Bug #1053260 [src:gst-plugins-bad1.0] gst-plugins-bad1.0:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1053259 1.22.0-4
Bug #1053259 [src:gst-plugins-bad1.0] gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-40476
Marked as found in versions gst-plugins-bad1.0/1.22.0-4.
> found 1053260 1.22.0-4
Bug #1053260 [src:gst-plugins-bad1.0] gst-plugins-bad1.0:
It has no reverse dependencies and is one of the last things keeping
rust-time-0.1 in Debian.
Not speaking for or against removal, but updating it to the latest
version would get rid of the dependency on time 0.1.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1053259 with 1052660
Bug #1053259 [src:gst-plugins-bad1.0] gst-plugins-bad1.0: CVE-2023-40476
1053259 was not blocked by any bugs.
1053259 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1053259: 1052660
> block 1053260 with 1052660
Bug
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 18:19:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053570: fixed in haskell-config-value 0.8.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053570,
regarding haskell-config-value FTBFS with alex 3.3.0.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 18:19:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052486: fixed in jpeg-xl 0.7.0-10.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052486,
regarding jpeg-xl: FTBFS with libwebp 1.3.2: Use static libwebp library without
linking libsharpyuv
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 17:49:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041332: fixed in mrtg 2.17.10-5+deb12u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041332,
regarding mrtg: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/mrtg/mrtg.cfg
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 17:47:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053142: fixed in chromium 117.0.5938.132-1~deb12u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053142,
regarding chromium cannot startup after libfreetype6 upgrade to
2.12.1+dfsg-5+deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This
Source: rust-pbr
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: and...@shadura.me
Can we remove rust-pbr from Debian?
It has no reverse dependencies and is one of the last things keeping
rust-time-0.1 in Debian.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1053536 ftbfs sid trixie
Bug #1053536 [squeekboard] squeekboard FTBFS with version 0.18 of rust gtk
stack.
Added tag(s) sid, trixie, and ftbfs.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023, at 17:39, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 11:32 AM Andrej Shadura wrote:
>> Debos uses libslirp in some modes of operation.
>
> How would I be able to find dependencies like this? Before removing packages?
$ apt rdepends libslirp-helper
libslirp-helper
Source: haskell-yi-core
Version: 0.19.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
Forwarded: https://github.com/yi-editor/yi/issues/1133
This package FTBFS with the latest version of haskell-unix-compat, which
is part of Stackage LTS 21 and available in Debian unstable.
--
Ilias
On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 11:32 AM Andrej Shadura wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023, at 17:20, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> > rust-libslirp has no reverse dependencies in Debian.
>
> Debos uses libslirp in some modes of operation.
How would I be able to find dependencies like this? Before removing packages?
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023, at 17:36, Peter Green wrote:
> We discussed this on irc a while back, and apparently the package is important
> to debos. Though the package relationship is only a "suggests".
Because it’s needed in the UML mode, but UML is not the main mode of operation.
UML is in
rust-libslirp has no reverse dependencies in Debian.
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path%3Adebian%2Fcontrol+rust-libslirp=1
It is also one of the blockers for removing the old rust-zbus-1 from
Debian. See https://bugs.debian.org/1053631
Can we remove rust-libslirp and rust-libslirp-sys
Control: tag 1053632 wontfix
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023, at 17:20, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> rust-libslirp has no reverse dependencies in Debian.
Debos uses libslirp in some modes of operation.
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 17:31:42 +0200
with message-id <088fa39f-289e-4d8f-bd83-764d67ca7...@app.fastmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1053632: rust-libslirp: Remove from Debian?
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053632,
regarding rust-libslirp: Remove from Debian?
to be marked as
Processing control commands:
> tag 1053632 wontfix
Bug #1053632 [src:rust-libslirp] rust-libslirp: Remove from Debian?
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
1053632: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: rust-libslirp
Version: 4.3.0-4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: andre...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rust-libslirp-sys
rust-libslirp has no reverse dependencies in Debian.
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path%3Adebian%2Fcontrol+rust-libslirp=1
It is also one of the blockers
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:rust-libslirp-sys
Bug #1053632 [src:rust-libslirp] rust-libslirp: Remove from Debian?
Added indication that 1053632 affects src:rust-libslirp-sys
--
1053632: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: flask-dance
Version: 6.2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: rc policy - "packages must be buildable within the same release".
Tags: trixie, sid
flask-dance build-depends on python3-sphinxcontrib.seqdiag which is not in
testing,
it was removed because it FTBFS and was badly broken,
Moin
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 03:01:51PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> ## Kernel modules will be signed with an ephemeral key
This is now
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/607.
> ## Image packages contains more version info
>
> Example: linux-image-6.5.3-cloud-arm64
>
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 14:42:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1038145: fixed in cgreen 1.6.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1038145,
regarding cgreen: FTBFS on s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Source: rust-extprim
Version: 1.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie sid
X-Debbugs-CC: sylves...@debian.org
rust-extprim has no reverse dependencies. Should we remove it from Debian?
This was proposed here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-rust/2022/10/msg0.html
Dropping the old semver
Source: python-aiortc
Version: 1.4.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #1042123
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I just rebuild the package with normal python3-aioice but it seems it
works. So am I missing something here?
--
Regards,
--
Bo YU
diff -Nru python-aiortc-1.4.0/debian/changelog
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 13:49:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053612: fixed in driftnet 1.5.0-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053612,
regarding driftnet: FTBFS on s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
I am uploading a NMU to fix this.
The debdiff is attached.diff -Nru driftnet-1.5.0/debian/changelog driftnet-1.5.0/debian/changelog
--- driftnet-1.5.0/debian/changelog 2023-09-22 22:35:48.0 +0200
+++ driftnet-1.5.0/debian/changelog 2023-10-07 15:31:13.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11
Source: driftnet
Version: 1.5.0-0.1
Severity: serious
My NMU does not build on s390x. I have created a fix at
https://github.com/deiv/driftnet/pull/50
Hi Rafael,
Le samedi 07 octobre 2023 à 14:15 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit :
> I have a question for the Debian Octave Group, related to Bug#1052973,
> which has been fixed in version 8.3.0-3 of octave-dev. This bug was
> preventing the building of the octave-image package. Should we
Hi,
I have a question for the Debian Octave Group, related to Bug#1052973,
which has been fixed in version 8.3.0-3 of octave-dev. This bug was
preventing the building of the octave-image package. Should we include
octave-dev >= 8.3.0-3 in Build-Depends of the otave-image package ?
Best,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1053405 = src:darktable
Bug #1053405 [src:gcc-13] darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?)
Removed indication that 1053405 affects src:darktable.
Added indication that 1053405 affects src:darktable
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
control: severity -1 wishlist
Hello,
On Sat, 07 Oct 2023 06:13:35 + JiaLing Zhang
wrote:
Source: ghc
Version: 9.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
hello,The upstream ghc-9.6.3 has been support loongarch64.Chould we
update the source ?
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #1053588 [src:ghc] ghc: Please add support for loongarch64
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
--
1053588: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053588
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Source: ghc
Version: 9.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
hello,The upstream ghc-9.6.3 has been support loongarch64.Chould we
update the source ?
53 matches
Mail list logo
