Package: mini-buildd-common
Version: 0.8.20
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package creates a system user
with a home directory in /home/$SYSUSER, which is a policy violation.
The FHS (which is part of the
retitle 668757 netdisco-{back,front}end: creates system user in /home
thanks
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package creates a system user
with a home directory in /home/$SYSUSER, which is a policy violation.
The FHS (which is part of the policy) states:
/home : User home
Package: samba4
Version: 4.0.0~beta1+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
Package: bacula-director-mysql
Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
From the attached log
Package: zope2.12-sandbox
Version: 2.12.23-1
Followup-For: Bug #656552
Hi,
the problem now also happens on a regular update from testing.
Adding set -x to the postinst script does not reveal any useful
information:
# dpkg --configure --pending
Setting up zope2.12-sandbox (2.12.23-1) ...
+ set
On 2012-06-16 19:26, Carlo Marchiori wrote:
No,
I switched to the radeon driver because I could not even start the gdm
using the fglrx driver.
So I had the radeon driver on when I submitted the bug, but not when
the bug happened.
Better run reportbug from the broken system, it works fine
On 2012-06-11 13:48, Julien Cristau wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
installable:
Not a bug, and expected. mysql-5.1 is going away.
Is there a chance to get the mysql-*-5.1 packages removed manually while
the old libmysqlclient* remains to complete the
Package: roundcube
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'wheezy' fails.
From the attached log (scroll to
Package: sugar-chat-activity-0.86
Version: 76-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'wheezy' fails.
From the attached log
-maintainer upload.
+ * Drop all binary packages except libmysqlclient16 and mysql-source-5.1
+as they are built from mysql-5.5 or obsoleted by their -5.5 successors and
+are no longer installable. (Closes: #677057)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:34:19 +0200
Package: xemacs21-support
Version: 21.4.22-3.2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
I see this in quite a few piuparts logfiles:
Setting up xemacs21-support (21.4.22-3.2) ...
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package
Package: clamav-base
Version: 0.97.5+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
Package: mingw-w64-dev,mingw-w64
Version: 3.0~svn4933-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
replaces relation.
See
Package: masqmail
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there
On 2012-06-23 11:24, markus schnalke wrote:
Surprisingly, the piuparts website reports the package to be successful:
http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/m/masqmail.html
That's not an upgrade test.
Look here (some time in the future, package is not yet tested,
dependencies are still
On 2012-06-23 12:55, Vincent Bernat wrote:
I was suggested to turn `roundcube-sqlite` into some kind of
transitional package. But it seems difficult for me to choose between
`roundcube-mysql` and `roundcube-sqlite`. And it does not explain why
APT does not know how to handle this.
This should
[dropping d-d@ as this question gets package specific]
On the other hand, adding the following transitional package:
Package: roundcube-sqlite
Depends: roundcube-mysql | roundcube-pgsql
[...]
solves the problem.
There is another question for the -sqlite - -mysql transition: How do
you
On 2012-06-23 19:08, Vincent Bernat wrote:
There is another question for the -sqlite - -mysql transition: How do
you migrate the data?
There is no migration path. That does not seem too hard but not too easy
either. There is already a bug report where the question was asked (but
maybe there
On 2012-06-15 11:13, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Once one of these bugs is fixed in sid I'll reschedule a full piuparts check
of sid to look for more impact of this bug, so please drop me a notice how
the new warning looks like.
After I rechecked sid/amd64 with piuparts and dpkg 1.16.4.* I
Package: pike7.8-image
Version: 7.8.352-dfsg-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to
Package: liblapack3
Version: 3.4.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
while doing piuparts tests distupgrading from squeeze to sid I noticed a
cooperation problem between octave and liblapack3:
[...]
Preparing to replace liblapack3gf 3.3.1-1 (using
On 2012-06-24 19:42, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
while doing piuparts tests distupgrading from squeeze to sid I noticed a
That was a test on distupgrading testing to sid, not squeeze. Sorry.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
Package: controlaula
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships files in
/etc/opt which falls in the same category as /opt that is reserved for
add-on software and is not to be used by Debian
Package: maildir-bulletin
Version: 0.69
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships directories in
the /home tree which is a policy/FHS violation.
/home is a site specific hierarchy and not to be used by any
Package: pdns-server
Version: 3.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there
Package: code-aster-gui,code-aster-run
Followup-For: Bug #670293
Hi,
the problem is still present in the lates release:
Setting up code-aster-run (1.10.4-2) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/codeaster/profile.csh ...
Configuration file `/etc/codeaster/asrun'
== Modified
On 2012-06-24 19:04, Joachim Breitner wrote:
looks like ghc made it in first (with a hint by luk, so no fair
comparison). I’m not sure if #676874 can be downgraded, though, as it
would still break installing packages from squeeze.
Downgrading wouldn't help anything anyway as the fixed dpkg is
Package: libguestfs-tools
Version: 1:1.18.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite
# added the missing font sources, but misplaced the mktexlsr call
# so that it is run too late - after the fonts are used
notfixed 574235 3.65+svn20090927-2
# dropped the now obsolete mktexlsr call, the font sources were
# already removed in 4.01c-1
fixed 574235 4.01e-6
thanks
On 2012-06-26
Package: controlaula
Version: 1.8.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #678851
Hi,
the updated ackage still ships a directory tree in /etc/opt:
/etc/opt
/etc/opt/chrome
/etc/opt/chrome/policies
/etc/opt/chrome/policies/managed
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: libguestfs-tools
Followup-For: Bug #678977
Hi,
the problem is still present in the latest upload.
The Breaks/Replaces you added are lacking the epoch 1: ...
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: libmagickcore5-extra
Version: 8:6.7.7.9-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to
Package: naist-jdic
Version: 1:0.4.3-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
From
Package: uprecords-cgi
Version: 1:0.3.17-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
Package: samba4
Version: 4.0.0~alpha19+dfsg1-7
Followup-For: Bug #670413
Not fixed in -7. Same error as before. New log attached.
Andreas
samba4_4.0.0~alpha19+dfsg1-7.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Package: uprecords-cgi
Followup-For: Bug #674624
Fix is trivial as I expected.
Patch attached.
Andreas
diff -Nru uptimed-0.3.17/debian/uprecords-cgi.config uptimed-0.3.17/debian/uprecords-cgi.config
--- uptimed-0.3.17/debian/uprecords-cgi.config 2012-05-25 02:52:18.0 +0200
+++
On 2012-05-27 21:06, Tomasz Rybak wrote:
Should I put
Breaks/Replaces: python-pyopencl ( 2011.2.2+git20120508-1)
or
Breaks/Replaces: python-pyopencl ( ${source:Version})?
Policy 7.6 uses hard-coded version, but many packages put
${source:Version} into debian/control. What is advised?
A
On 2012-05-29 19:50, Tomasz Rybak wrote:
Thanks for the explanation.
I have decided to put:
Replaces: python-pyopencl ( 2011.2+git20120508-1)
Breaks: python-pyopencl ( ${source:Version}),
python-pyopencl ( ${source:Version}),
python3-pyopencl ( ${source:Version}),
python3-pyopencl (
Package: psad
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is no
Package: nova-common
Version: 2012.1-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to remove.
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Removing nova-common ...
dpkg: error processing nova-common
Package: phpunit-selenium
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks/Replaces relation.
See policy
Package: icinga-idoutils
Version: 1.7.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install,
remove (but not purge), and install again.
Before the second installation the package is in
Package: php5-suhosin
Version: 0.9.33-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
From the attached log (scroll to
Package: jffnms
Version: 0.9.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
From the attached log (scroll to the
Package: check-mk-multisite
Followup-For: Bug #674937
Hi,
chown: cannot access `/etc/check_mk/conf.d': No such file or directory
thats a duplicate of http://bugs.debian.org/649316
and can be fixed by updating the backport of check-mk-multisite to the
latest version from testing.
Andreas
:46.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+starpu (1.0.1-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * fix gcc versioning
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de Thu, 31 May 2012 07:36:35 +0200
+
starpu (1.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru starpu-1.0.1
Package: libdbus-c++-dev
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite
Package: libchef-ruby,libchef-ruby1.8
Version: 0.10.10-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
installable in sid:
Package: libchef-ruby
Version:
Package: puppetmaster-passenger
Version: 3.0.0~rc2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'wheezy' fails.
From the
Package: wine-bin
Version: 1.4-0.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails.
From the attached log (scroll to the
On 2012-06-01 13:57, Touko Korpela wrote:
Is this modifying files from another package (found by piuparts) bug
specific to 1:2.22-1.1 NMU version or is it also present in 1:2.22-1?
If it isn't NMU spesific then BTS version tracking should let know it.
Just looked into the issue.
1:2.22-1.1
Version: 1.0.10-2
dee (1.0.10-2) unstable; urgency=low
+ gir1.2-dee-1.0: Added Breaks field, which prevents removal of files that
also belong to gir1.2-dee-0.5 (Closes: #674534)
the problem persists, there is no Breaks field:
Package: gir1.2-dee-1.0
Source: dee
Version: 1.0.10-2
Package: gnustep-back-common
Version: 0.22.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #663388
Hi,
there are now fewer directories, but there is still something in $HOME:
0m47.6s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
/root/GNUstep/ not owned
/root/GNUstep/Library/ not owned
Andreas
Package: zfs-fuse
Version: 0.7.0-7
Followup-For: Bug #669246
Hi,
since /etc/init.d/fuse does no longer exist, that dependency needs to be
dropped from from the zfs-fuse initscript.
Selecting previously unselected package zfs-fuse.
(Reading database ... 7189 files and directories currently
Package: dict-wn
Version: 1:3.0-27
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
From the
Package: icinga-idoutils
Version: 1.7.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
From the attached log (scroll
Package: apper-data
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other
Package: ooohg
Version: 09.12a-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
From the attached log (scroll to the
Package: rt4-extension-assettracker
Version: 2.0.0~b2-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
From the attached
On 2012-06-05 14:36, Antonio Aguilar wrote:
My system didn't crash, but I get a blinking cursor after GDM3 load and
this error on the Xorg log file:
Please don't hijack bug reports with unrelated problems.
*** Please don't reply to this bug, open a new one instead. ***
Fatal server error:
[
Package: eclipse-platform-data
Version: 3.8.0~rc3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
Package: fonts-ipaexfont-gothic,fonts-ipaexfont-mincho
Version: 00103-11
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a
Package: fonts-ipafont-gothic,fonts-ipafont-mincho
Version: 00303-7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a
On 2012-06-04 13:17, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
as far as I can see this is rather a consequence of #607638 which hardly
can be closed due to the fact that it is in stable. As far as I can
see the bug is *not* found in Version: 1:3.0-27.
So what would you actually suggest to close this
Package: freemedforms-emr
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite
Package: apper-data
Version: 0.7.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #675538
Hi,
a new override problem showed up in the updated version:
Selecting previously unselected package apper-data.
Unpacking apper-data (from .../apper-data_0.7.2-2_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
Package: gnumed-doc
Version: 1.1.15-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
installable in sid:
Package: gnumed-doc
Source: gnumed-client
Version:
Package: wine
Version: 1.4-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
wine-bin is missing on amd64, making wine uninstallable.
Package: wine
Version: 1.4-3
Architecture: amd64
Depends: wine-bin (= 1.4-3)
$ rmadison wine
wine | 1.0.1-1 | lenny|
Package: python-glance
Version: 2012.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
installable in sid:
Package: python-glance
Source: glance
Version: 2012.1-2
Package: wine-bin
Version: 1.4.1-1.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
Package: naist-jdic
Followup-For: Bug #679195
Hi,
the problem is not solved, but an additional error shows up:
Selecting previously unselected package naist-jdic.
(Reading database ... 6873 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking naist-jdic (from
Package: code-aster-gui
Version: 1.10.4-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
From
Package: python-mode
Version: 1:6.0.10-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'wheezy' fails.
From the attached log
On 2012-05-02 06:09, pal wrote:
GPU: NVidia GeForce GTX560Ti 1024MB
Steps for reproduce:
1. Run nvclock with any option (I tried most of them)
I can't reproduce the problem here. It's probably depending on the
graphics card used - nvclock hasen't been updated for a long time and
does not
Package: live-tools
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
From the attached log (scroll to the
Package: supercollider,supercollider-common
Version: 1:3.5.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it
Package: xymon-client
Version: 4.3.7-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails.
From the attached log (scroll to
Package: postgres-xc
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
From the
Package: fs2ram
Version: 0.3.11
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies files from
another package. This is so wrong, I'm not even bothered to look
up the part of policy this violates ;-P
From the
On 2012-07-01 01:58, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 01:39:30AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
+ '[' '!' -S /var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432 ']'
+ i=11
+ sleep 1
+ '[' 11 -gt 10 ']'
+ exit 1
dpkg: error processing postgres-xc (--configure):
subprocess installed post
Package: migemo-el
Version: 20110227-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite files
Package: strongswan
Version: 4.6.4-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
Package: ia32-libs
Version: 20120616
Severity: serious
Hi,
please provide detailed instructions how to perform piuparts tests on
packages that depend on (or are) ia32-libs. These tests are done
fully automatic with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive.
Ideally provide custom scripts that can be added
Package: iptables-persistent
Version: 0.5.5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
modprobe is now available, new problems show up:
During a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install in
a chroot. As per definition of the release team this
Package: pleiades
Version: 1.3.4-dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies a conffile from
eclipse-platform.
This is a violation of policy 10.7.4: Sharing configuration files.
user debian...@lists.debian.org
usertag 679606 piuparts
clone 679606 -1
reassign 679606 ruby-hpricot 0.8.6-2
fixed 679606 0.8.6-3
reassign -1 ruby-fast-xs 0.8.0-2
reopen -1
thanks
cloning and reassigning to ruby-fast-xs which needs to add
Breaks/Replaces since it takes over some files from
Hi Goswin,
I would really appreciate if you try to create a working script instead
of giving a vague description, especially for the dist-upgrade case.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 2012-07-03 12:00, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
How? As far as I see there is no framework in place to do a second
dist-upgrade or to do an upgrade of selective packages (apt/dpkg) first.
Well, there are the pre_distupgrade scripts.
But how can you do the partial dist-upgrade (dpkg and
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your packages cronjob exits with
error.
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m26.4s INFO: Package apt contains cron file: /etc/cron.daily/apt
Package: xml2rfc
Version: 1.36-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
(in 'squeeze'), remove (but not purge), distupgrade to 'wheezy',
and install again.
Before the second installation the
Package: binfmt-support
Version: 2.0.8
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed a failure in the jarwrapper
package whcih I traced to update-binfmts.
To reproduce:
* the host has the kernel module loaded and
Package: 389-ds-base
Version: 1.2.11.7-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
From
Hi Roland,
sorry, it took me a while to answer this ...
On 2012-03-20 14:24, Roland Mas wrote:
I'm not sure there's a way to fix that without touching the packages
in stable;
Touching stable is not an option, this needs to be fixed by the package
in squeeze.
so, while I agree this bug is
Package: trousers
Version: 0.3.9-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to remove.
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Removing trousers ...
prerm called with unknown argument
On 2012-07-05 15:15, Roland Mas wrote:
I can't limit that a posteriori, I'm afraid. Even for users who
installed the very minimal set of packages and didn't customize
anything, there's still at least the variability of the hostname.
Well, you can extract the hostname and check, whether it
Package: postgres-xc-server-dev
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
there is a diversion clash:
Selecting previously unselected package postgresql-common.
Unpacking postgresql-common (from .../postgresql-common_132_all.deb) ...
Package: vmm,vmware-manager
Version: vmware-manager/0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2012-06-30
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by
Package: beast,beast-mcmc
Version: beast-mcmc/1.6.2-2
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2012-06-30
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their
Package: gmap,scotch
Version: scotch/5.1.12b.dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2012-06-16
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their
Package: pyside-tools
Version: 0.2.14-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
From
401 - 500 of 8042 matches
Mail list logo
