Hi Paul,
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:52:55AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > The only solution I can see is to exclude it also from ppc64el
> > architecture.
>
> The test, or the package? Either works for me.
I admit I thought about the package - I need to think about just
excluding the test.
> Ob
Hi Paul,
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:35:27AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: retitle -1 gdpc: flaky autopkgtest on ppc64el
> ...
>
> I'm seeing the same error regularly on ppc64el too.
The only solution I can see is to exclude it also from ppc64el
architecture.
Hi,
I'd like to forward this to Debian Java list for comments.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 01:50:01PM +0200, olivier sallou wrote:
> Issue seems to be related to xml-apis.jar not being symlinked itself
>
> /usr/share/java# ls *xml-api*
> xml-apis-1.4.01.jar xml-apis-ex
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 04:45:20PM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> The capitalization typo seems to be present also in arrayfire's
> use_debian_packaged_libs.patch: I believe line 64 of
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/arrayfire/-/blob/a11a6fef7dadf8ce594920626058990fe0caeb2a/debian/pa
Hi Aaron,
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 08:14:10PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Please try adding a build dependency on libclfft-dev and replacing
> src/backend/opencl/CMakeLists.txt's inclusion of build_clFFT with a call
> to
>
> find_package(clFFT)
>
> > Thanks a lot for your initial hint
Thanks
Hi Aaron,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 08:30:39AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Andreas Tille writes:
>
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthreads
>
> Thanks for posting a link to the full log! AFAICT, the actual errors
> appear much earlier, on lines 1573-1593:
>
> C
Hi,
I personally have no interest in arrayfire but I realised that the
Debian packaged version depends clblas (and is the only remaining
package that needs cblas and I would like to see it removed from Debian
due to bug #949767) Thus I tried to upgrade arrayfire to the latest
upstream version in
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 07:20:03AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> ... which will safe it for the next stable release - otherwise it will be
> removed from there which would be a shame.
This has happened now. It would be great if you could fix this in a next
dicompyler release to re-include
Hi,
I realised that on one hand there is a patch for this package but no
according upload and on the other hand there is the option that the
package can be removed without affecting other packages.
Any progress on this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi Aaron,
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 08:57:05PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On 10-04-2021 00:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > which was filed against the kaptive package:
> >
> > #986592: kleborate: flaky arm64 autopkgtest: Mutex is not owned by current
> > thread
>
Hi Jelmer,
I've got a testing-removal warning for routine-update due this bug. I
know you are usually very prompt in replying to issues thus I'm simply
wondering whether you might have missed this bug report. I personally
have never dived into lintian-brush but if you give some signal that you
a
Hi Aditya,
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 08:18:15PM -0700, Aditya Panchal wrote:
> Hope you are doing well. It is possible to use the `legacycontour` package
> available here: https://github.com/matplotlib/legacycontour and follow the
> instructions by Alan listed here:
> https://github.com/bastula/d
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 08:13:52AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Don't worry, I am still looking into this crash, and had primarily
> intended that comment as a public note to myself -- the crash occured
> within a (presumably valid) call to ncbi-blast+, and wound up taking
> quite a few tries to r
Hi Aaron,
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:01:21AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Never mind, this appears to be a different issue, per a backtrace
> obtained with EXCEPTION_STACK_TRACE_LEVEL=Error and a great deal of
> patience:
>
> Error: tblastn encountered an error:
> terminate called after throwing
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Aaron,
do you have possibly any hint what might be wrong here?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:35:42PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: kleborate
> Version: 2.0.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debi
Hi Lucas,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 08:49:27AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I confirm that I can still reproduce this failure in a testing chroot.
Thank you for your information. I have tried to create a diff between
the successful build log of the autobuilders[1] where all architectures
have pa
fun).
> >
> > Can you take care of that?
>
> I was to file bugs to notify Debian Javascript Maintainers this
> evening, but I see Andreas Tille already uploaded the fix.
Both packages are uploaded and according unblock bugs to release.d.o
filed. :-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
og
> r-cran-dt-0.17+dfsg/debian/changelog
> --- r-cran-dt-0.17+dfsg/debian/changelog 2021-02-12 08:11:25.0
> +0100
> +++ r-cran-dt-0.17+dfsg/debian/changelog 2021-03-28 11:38:02.0
> +0200
> @@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
> +r-cran-dt (0.17+dfsg-3) unstable; u
Hi Étienne,
thanks a lot for working on this.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 10:43:10PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I pushed a change on Salsa[1] to make sure that the two
> following piuparts upgrade paths are working okay (thanks
> Andreas Tille for the permission):
&g
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
OK, I was able to reproduce the issue with
> sudo piuparts --fail-on-broken-symlinks --warn-on-leftovers-after-purge
> r-cran-dt_0.17+dfsg-2_amd64.changes
...
1m7.6s DEBUG: Command failed (status=1), but ignoring error: ['lsof', '-w',
'+D', '/tmp/tmpc4jzyfzf']
1m9.2s
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andreas.
> >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
>
> 1m34.8s ERROR: FAIL: silently overwrites files via directory symlinks:
> /usr/lib/R/site-library/DT/htmlwidgets/lib/datatables-extensions/AutoFill
> (r-cran-dt) != /usr/share/javascript/jquery-datata
Hi,
I recommend to remove armhf from the list of architectures.
This kind of software is possibly not used on armhf and
upstream (in CC) will probably confirm this.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:08:15PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: gemma
> Version: 0.98.3+dfsg-1
> S
Hi,
it would be great if someone could have a look at this.
I can not work on this issue until next week.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 02:28:17PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Source: r-cran-effectsize
> Version: 0.4.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: bullseye sid
> X-Debb
HI Graham,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 05:40:34PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
>
> No, the tests that britney schedules for migration are run in testing,
> and usually only the package to be tested comes from unstable. The
> idea is to simulate what would break in testing, if this package from
> unsta
Hi Graham,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:27:49PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
>
> >https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-bioc-mutationalpatterns/
> >
> > I discussed several times with Paul Gevers about this view. I consider
> > it not helpful to print test results of very outdated versions for
> >
nd whether you know a link where I can
have a simple access to the most recent test results.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 12:44:34PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Andreas
>
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 12:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > My motivation fo
Hi Graham,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 12:44:34PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Andreas
>
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 12:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > My motivation for the change was that for
> > example in r-bioc-mutationalpatterns (see bug #983027) the
> > autopkgtest-pkg
Hi Graham,
sorry for all the mess. My motivation for the change was that for
example in r-bioc-mutationalpatterns (see bug #983027) the
autopkgtest-pkg-r script failed to install all needed packages
to run its test. This was not the only package that was affected.
I perfectly agree that this wa
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important
Hi John,
thanks a lot for your attempt to use Debian packaged dicomscope and your
bug report as response to our work.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 08:01:55AM +, John Talbut wrote:
> After attempting to install this package it does not work
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:16:46AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> > The brute force approach works for me:
> > 1. install seqan-dev from buster (for step 2)
> > 2. cp -a /usr/include/seqan debian/
> > 3. in debian/control remove the seqan-dev build dependency
> > 4. in debian/rules pass -DSEQAN_IN
Hi,
besides this on arm64[1] and mips64el:
...
cd opal && \
g++ -c -O3 -std=c++11 -march=native opal.cpp
opal.cpp:9:10: fatal error: immintrin.h: No such file or directory
9 | #include // AVX2 and lower
| ^
compilation terminated.
Since this seems to be somehow r
Hi Graham,
I've uploaded a change that (hopefully!) fixes the issue.
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 08:24:09AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> The recent upload of dh-r causes autopkgtests using pkg-r-autopkgtest
> to fail. See for example the output of r-bioc-affy [1] below.
> Presumably caused by this c
Hi,
any update to this bug?
If we do not find a timely solution what do you think about excluding
s390x temporarily from the list of architectures of this package and set
this bug to "important"?
I would not be happy about this but the issue creates some autoremoval
warnings on other packages wh
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/OpenMS/OpenMS/issues/5151
Hi Filippo,
this is extremely unfortunate. However, I guess the alternative would
have been to keep some RC buggy seqan-dev which would not have helped
openms as well. I tried the same as Peter and replaced the
Build-Depends seqan-dev by libseqan2-dev.
I can confirm the observation from Peter a
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 assafgor...@gmail.com
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Assaf,
as you can read in a recent bug report in Debian[1] datamash fails for
some architectures (namely the Debian release architectures armel, armhf
and mipsel) its build time test in some pa
Hi folks,
I think this is a consequence of running autopkgtest-pkg-r blindly for all
bioc packages since we are adding
Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-r
automatically to all packages. The "manual" test is prevented by simply
renaming the debian/tests/control file to
https://salsa.debian.org/
Hi Joshua,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:03:23PM -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > I submitted a new release to CRAN yesterday. It usually takes a few days
> > to correct any lingering issues and get it approved.
>
> CRAN peeps said that v2.19.1 is accepted. I know the package info page
> isn't
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 11:38:35PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> failed to arrive with working minimal patch against that elderly 1.2.1
>
> FWIW built current snapshot which seems to be ok. but I am reluctant to
> upload that one since it has breaking (we have no rev-depends though in
> debi
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 06:12:12PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: gemma
> Version: 0.98.4+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-202102
Hi Yaroslav,
could you please have a look. I'm occupied by many other things and will not
care for this one.
Kind regards
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from Debian testing autoremoval watch
-
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 04:39:04 +
From: Debian testing autoremoval watch
To: py.
Hi Kevin,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:20:38AM -0800, Kevin Ushey wrote:
> Perhaps I'm misunderstanding, but there is a Debian patch for RcppParallel
> here:
>
> https://sources.debian.org/patches/r-cran-rcppparallel/5.0.2+dfsg-3/use_debian_packaged_libtbb.patch/
>
> and all that does is force Rc
Hi Bastian,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 06:55:57PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Control: retitle -2 r-cran-rcppparallel: generates broken load path for
> libtbb and fails on several architectures
Thanks a lot for the bug report including explanation and patch.
> - r-cran-rcppparallel trying to wor
Control: tags -1 help
Aaron (or whoever might want to check), do you have any idea?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:43:00PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream
>
> ...
> Attached are the relevant parts from the upstream fix.
Thanks. Uploaded.
> After that, it is worth trying whether this fixed python-cobra.
Python-cobra builds nicely now. Unfortunate
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Pierre,
do you have some idea how to fix this?
Kind regards
- Forwarded message from Adrian Bunk -
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 17:55:20 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#982111: r-cran-rcdk: autopkgtest failure
X-Debian-PR-Messag
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 01:23:26PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> I would be inclined to vote for a removal on that
> architecture.
Fully ACK!
Just go for it. Thanks a lot for caring
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Control: tags -1 help
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 12:44:46PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ══ Failed tests
>
> ── Error (test_annotateTargets.R:2:1): (code run outside of `test_that()`)
> ─
> Error: there is no package called ‘TxDb.H
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I have updated Git[1] to the latest upstream version to potentially
solve this issue. Unfortunately the build stops with:
...
copying cloud_sptheme/ext/static/auto_redirect.html_t ->
/build/cloud-sptheme-1.10.1.post20200504175005/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/cloud_spth
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pyglet/pyglet/issues/346
Hi,
I have opened an issue on Github about this issue. It persists for
the latest upstream version 1.5.14 as well.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi Étienne,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 07:58:51PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
>
> Your guess is right; setting the PYTHONPATH to the build
> directory allows most tests to run. There were a couple of
> tests which then still failed to execute with the following
> symptom though:
>
> Comman
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 Bioconductor Package Maintainer
Hi,
the Debian packaged ShortRead is tested in CI test on different hardware
architectures. On the debci page[1] you can see the matrix for success
and failure which shows that amd64 and i386 are passing the comple
Control: tags -1 moreinfo, unreproducible
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Lucas,
I've build r-cran-rstan in a clean chroot and it builds nicely as
expected. May be the issue you observed has vanished?
Could you please re-check whether I'm missing something? I've
set severity to important mea
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:51:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> this bug report is from 24 Dec, so the breakage was not caused by the
> libsbml 5.19 upgrade.
>
> python-cobra seems to have been broken by Python 3.8 -> 3.9
Yes, but it seems cobra 0.20 is broken by libsbml 5.19 which is no
real los
Hi Adrian,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:07:27AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > __ ERROR at setup of TestManipulation.test_escape_ids
> > __
> >
> > filename = '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cobra/test/data/textbook.xml.gz'
> > number =
> > f_replace = {'F_GENE': ,
> > 'F_G
Hi,
thanks to Nilesh and ftpmaster finally the needed dependencies for
q2-feature-classifier are available. Unfortunately when I tried to
build the package there where some test failures in autopkgtest:
...
test session starts ==
platform
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:32:29AM +0100, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
> FYI: Seqan 1 is no longer supported upstream, and the only package in Debian
> that uses it is also no longer available/maintained.
if there are no rdepends of seqan1 any more feel free to file a ROM bug.
Kind regar
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:49:20PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> Control: tag -1 unreproducible
> ...
> Anyone else is able to reproduce the problem ?
The package builds nicely in my pbuilder chroot as well. So I'm
setting severity from
Hi Graham,
so what is you suggestion? Simply droping the test is possibly
not the best solution. Marking it flaky comes to mind. What
do you think?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:52:49AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Source: r-bioc-geoquery
> Version: 2.58.0+dfsg-1
> S
Dear Juhani,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:51:05AM +0200, Juhani Numminen wrote:
> >
> > make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/common'
> > libtool --mode=compile -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c
> > src/RcsbPlatform.C -o ./obj/RcsbPlatform.
Hi,
I was just looking into a rdepends of numba which does not build
currently. Did anybody yet had a look into version 0.52.0 of
numba whether it solves the current issues?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Control: tags -1 help
Control: tags -1 - pending
Hi,
there is a remaining build time test issue which I reported upstream:
https://github.com/lbcb-sci/racon/issues/50
I have no idea how to fix this since gdb does not really give a good
hint about the SIGSEGV that occures.
Kind regards
Control: tags -1 - upstream
Hi,
upstream has released a Python3 version of macsyfinder which I pushed to
Git[1]. When trying to build I get a strange error:
dh_auto_install -O--buildsystem=pybuild
I: pybuild base:232: /usr/bin/python3 setup.py install --root
'/build/macsyfinder-2.0~rc1/debi
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 02:48:50PM +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>
> No, I didn't correct this specific issue. Just added the new symbols from
> the new release. However a patch or a list of "all" symbols is very welcome.
I'd like to repeat my suggestion to move that package to a team
ere you can see what architectures are running the build time test
successfully (and which not):
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=parsinsert
Hope this is answering your question.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:43 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> >
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: tags -1 help
Control: forwarded -1 David Knox
Hi David,
there is a bug[1] report filed against the Debian packaged version of
ParsInsert. The full build log for ppc64el can be found here[2]. The
problem is also present for other architectures like mips64el[3]
Hi Alex,
did you possibly by chance forgot to close #969597 in
your latest upload of libzstd 1.4.8+dfsg-1 ?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi Yaroslav,
shouldn't this bug be closed now?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Control: severity -1 important
The failing test is skiped in the latest upload which not really
fixes the bug but enables building and testing the package.
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/bioperl/Bio-DB-EMBL/issues/2
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/NeurodataWithoutBorders/pynwb/issues/1329
Control: retitle -1 Reactivate test for gdcm which was excluded due to failure
Control: severity -1 important
This single test prevented testing migration of this package and all
its dependencies. Thus the test was deactivated for the moment to
enable building the package. But the issue should b
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:44:04PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >
> > so it does not fit with our policy: do not hide problems ;)
Well, we do not need to *hide* the problem. We can exclude the test and
*document* the problem - say in a README.Debian on the affected
architecture.
>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 07:37:12PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:32:01PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I tried no override_dh_shlibdeps in shasta debian/rules, which has lead
> > to:
> >
> > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot find library
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:41:58PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/18/20 3:19 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I wonder whether we could get some help from PowerPC team to solve this
> > issue. If we can not get that test working I see only two options:
> >
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 15:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Control: tags -1 help
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to fix the issue by making dh_shlibdeps work. In
> >
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/shasta/-/commit/366edd672be428c
welcome.
Kind regards
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from Matt Newville -
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 05:35:01 -0800
From: Matt Newville
To: lmfit/lmfit-py
Cc: Andreas Tille , Author
Subject: Re: [lmfit/lmfit-py] Test failure on ppc64el (#692)
This is a duplicate of #686. Personally
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I tried to fix the issue by making dh_shlibdeps work. In
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/shasta/-/commit/366edd672be428cc553b34b99bc614aa698175d6
I documented what I tried but all failed and I think the key to this bug
is just making it work.
Any idea?
Kind re
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/lmfit/lmfit-py/issues/692
Hi Joshua,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 08:59:39AM -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> Yeah, that sounds like a good solution. I don't anticipate a lot of
> demand for OpenMx on 32bit arm. I believe we already have 64bit arm
> working. We'll try to get a new release out soon.
That's very helpful. Ple
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 09:45:30AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> I just built ghmm by removing --with-gsl.
>
> It seems that the gsl implementation of blas conflict with the one provided
> in atlas.
> so --enable-gsl + --enable-atlas seems wrong...
Works, uploaded, thanks a lot, Andre
Hi Joshua,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 10:59:18AM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > While I could include this as a patch I wonder whether you plan to do a
> > new release featuring this patch in the next couple of da
Control: reasign -1 ftp.debian.org
As the bug reporter stated the package is useless and should be
removed from Debian
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Control: retitle -1 [ROM] hyantesite: Please remove hyantesite since Uploader
seems not active any more and several attempts to fix FTBFS issues have failed
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Hi ftpmasters,
as the bug log shows several people who failed to fix FTBFS issues in
this package have
Hi again,
any more hints how we finally can build ghmm?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 04:52:14PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
> thanks for the hint but simply using gsl as is was done in this package
> and now it does not build any more. Howe
Hi again,
sorry, I intended to respond to bug #977473 as well which really should
be dealt with,
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Steve and Gert,
>
> besides bug #977120 which is tagged patch insighttoolkit4 should be
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Adrian,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:12:31PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Please contact me if you need assistance.
I think I need assistance. The Auto-Building page[1] shows green for
all, amd64 and arm64 and
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.
Hi Shayan,
did you had some reasons to add this hardcoded dependency?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:15:44PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Source: shasta
> Version: 0.6.0-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Hi Maintainer
>
> Binary package shasta has a hardcoded depe
Hi Frédéric
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
> Here is a patch based on this :
> https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Yacc-and-Lex.html
>
> Tested on a power machine (where the build failed) and it seems to work.
Thanks a lot
Andreas.
-
Hi Mathieu,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:10:17AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> "make -j160"
>
> that would be my guess :)
This sounds pretty likely, thought. Thanks for the hint.
> remove parallel from the dh option, and try again (fixes symptoms)
To cure the real issue rather than the symp
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:58:23AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > In the kmc case I'm seriously wondering whether we should restrict
> > the architectures to those that are relevant in practice. It seems
> > to be in line with upstream and I'm tempted to follow Étienne's
> > suggestion to upgrade t
Hi Paul,
just a general question: The general overview page like
https://ci.debian.net/packages/k/kmc/
does not seem to be updated while the specific architecture
pages like
https://ci.debian.net/packages/k/kmc/testing/armhf/
shows the issue. I remember I was asking in connection with
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I tried to investigate the situation below and my guess is that lex has
somehow problems to create the missing header files. I've found the
files in upstreams .gitignore file so these need to be created but this
does not seem to work on ppc64el (any more - since the pac
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I can reproduce the issue but unfortunately I have no idea how to
solve this.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/nipy/nipy/issues/466
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:11:27PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> https://github.com/nipy/nipy/issues/461
As far as I can see that's included into 0.4.3~rc1. Yaroslav, would
you mind commenting on this? It would be great to have some kind of
0.4.3~rc2 to get nipy fixed.
Kind regards
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 confirmed
> This package only builds Arch:all binary packages. ...
Thus I'm decreasing its severity.
I was able to reproduce the issue on my pinebook64 and will try to
forward the issue upstream.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I've updated nipy Git[1] to version 0.4.3~rc1 which solves the
originally reported issue. However, there are some remaining failures
in the build time test:
...
==
ERROR: Failu
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: tags -1 help
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:24:34PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ...
> #set -e; for v in 3.9; do
> set -e; for v in 3.8; do \
> PATH=$PATH:/<>/debian/mypy/usr/bin/ python$v -m pytest -n
> auto \
> -o testpaths=mypy/test -o python_files=test
Control: tags -1 help
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded https://github.com/hdmf-dev/hdmf/issues/494
601 - 700 of 3031 matches
Mail list logo
