severity 348577 important
thanks
Quoting Benoit Friry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: geneweb
Version: 4.10-17
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello Christian,
The /etc/init.d/geneweb start procedure calls a $WRAPPER file (which
is /usr/lib/geneweb/gwd.wrapper),
Quoting Benoit Friry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: geneweb
Version: 4.10-17
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello Christian,
The /etc/init.d/geneweb start procedure calls a $WRAPPER file (which
is /usr/lib/geneweb/gwd.wrapper), but this file is not executable.
Package: kaudiocreator
Version: 4:3.5.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
At least the package became unusable for me..:-)
Ripping is currently completely unfunctional in kaudiocreator.
Any attempt to rip an audio CD results in a window popping up with File or
directory
severity 349250 normal
thanks
The install worked, but when I log into Gnome as a user I always get a
message: No volume control element and/or devices found
Furthermore, none of the sound applications work. They load up and play
music but no sound comes out. I'm not sure the installation
severity 349256 normal
clone 349256 -1
reassign -1 pkgsel
retitle -1 Should display the file transfer rate when downloading files
severity -1 wishlist
thanks
I sort of like having it reboot after the base system is installed, so if it
won't reboot you find out faster.
Hmmm, you don't exactly
severity 349120 serious
merge 349120 349442
thanks
Quoting Vincent Lefevre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I get the following error:
ay:/home/lefevre# dpkg --configure -a
dpkg: ../../src/packages.c:191:
Quoting Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
tags 350050 + confirmed upstream
found 350050 3.0.21a-1
stop
Timur Izhbulatov wrote:
Looks like a problem with linkage:
import samba.smb
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in ?
ImportError:
Quoting Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Christian Perrier wrote:
This week-end, I think we can think about uploading a new release of
the package as the former one will enter testing.
Apparently it's stuck because it thinks there are RC bugs. Either it's
not understanding BTS
Package: udev
Version: 0.084-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
OK, this is maybe overflated...I actually hesitate abou tthe severity and
the breaks the whole system statement...but, after all, breaking the
normal install of the system with our installer is kinda breaking
Quoting Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: poedit
Version: 1.3.1-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
cp -f /usr/share/aclocal/wxwin.m4 ./admin/
cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/aclocal/wxwin.m4': No such file or directory
make: ***
Attached is a proposed patch which should fix this issue.
(I included some other simple changes, too)
While preparing what was supposed to be a l10n NMU, I went on a few
other simple to fix issues:
* Lintian fixes (the obvious ones):
- Remove dh-make boilerplate in copyright
-
According to lifelines authors, they're not confident enough for
declaring 4.0.40 stable. So, this bug will remain opened for
preventing lifelines to enter sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
tags 231924 - fixed
merge 231924 231923
thanks
This doesn't seem like it was fixed and still failed to build in
the same way.
Well, at least I attempted. As this NMU wasn't targeted at that
specific bug, I guess I have to leave it to someone
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quoting Richard A Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: isoqlog
Version: 2.2-0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
the recent isoqlog upgrade is uninstallable on my system. I get as far
as answering the debconf
Quoting Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com):
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
(no legal nitpicking in the following, just common sense)
Please note for further reference that each and every line, paragraph,
documentation, translation, line of
severity 317248 normal
reassign 317248 installation-report
thanks
Quoting R Ransbottom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: install
Version: N/A; reported 2005-07-06
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel:
Please answer to the bug report rather than only to myself... but I
should have setup the Reply-To fielsd. Hence forwarding your answer.
So, Mario's answer:
El mié, 27-07-2005 a las 07:19 +0200, Christian Perrier escribió:
Quoting Abajo Duran, Mario ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: winbind
clone 330247 -1
reassign -1 manpages-de
retitle -1 Please stop providing outdated manpages
thanks
Quoting Jan Brüninghaus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: login
Version: 1:4.0.3-39
Severity: grave
Tags: l10n
Justification: renders package unusable
The package tries to overwrite
Quoting Jan Niehusmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I get the same problem with the package passwd, containing passwd.5
which is also in manpages-de.
So, this file should also be thrown out from manpages-de.
ALL shadow man pages translations should be removed from manpages-de.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Quoting Nicolas François ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
tags 330291 pending
thanks
Committed.
Thanks for noticying and for the patch.
I'm building 4.0.12-4 with Junichi's patch.
/me slams self for bad use of dh_installpam in his attempts to make
debian/rules a little bit less messy..:-|
Thanks,
severity 330325 normal
severity 330271 normal
merge 330325 330271
retitle 330325 Please stop providing man pages for login and passwd
retitle 330573 Please stop providing man pages belonging to the passwd and
login packages
retitle 330574 Please stop providing man pages belonging to the passwd
(OK, Steve, you're right about the severity...I was mistaken by some
comments in the bug log)
Mario,
Could you please test the new samba 3.0.20b packages built by Noàl
Köthe ?
In samba's bug 2776, upstream requests more testing with the new
version and got no answer.
It would be nice if you
tags 299549 pending
thanks
Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I was told on a non-Debian mailing list that upgrade from woody to sarge
fails because of conflicts between login/sarge and manpages-it/woody.
This is similar to #284239.
Thanks for investigating this completely, Denis. As
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: base-installer
Version: 2.74
Severity: serious
This version of base-config, which drops apt-setup, breaks d-i etch beta
Didn't you mean to assign this to base-config ?
I didn't reassign as I don't want to break some intent I would not
have
I confirm this bug, as well as the diagnostic as I was hit by it. It
broke my whereami scripts but I however do not think it should be
tagged security as I see no security implications.
I'm not even sure it deserves the serious severity. important
would be enough but, being trivial to fix, I
I'd like to add a few input lines about this RC bug for wxwindows2.5.
I also have a package (poedit) being held out of testing because of
this RC bug in wxwindows2.5
However, when I decided to build it agains 2.5 and not 2.4, I first
considered that the version of poedit I have in testing is
Quoting Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: geneweb
Version: 4.10-6
Severity: grave
The prerm of geneweb finds files that it thinks are geneweb databases
located everywhere on the system and starts altering them (updating,
moving, etc).
updating: no
moving : no
I agree to this, a maintainer-script shouldn't just write on random
places on the filesystem.
For instance, looking a bit better at the code, I think it has a serious
security problem. What if a malicious would do the following:
touch mydata.gwb
ln -s /sbin/init mydata.update.gw
Hmmm,
:06:05 -0500
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Win XP file listing bug in smbclient and libsmbclient
Christian Perrier wrote:
| Jerry, Jeremy,
|
| In case I forget before
Quoting Gabor Guzmics ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
I tried to reproduce your problem. But tested in konqueror and smbc and
I can't reproduce it. For me this problem is fixed.
Can you give your smb.conf here ?
Which version of smbc and konqueror do you have ?
Regards,
Matthijs Mohlmann
Quoting Gerald (Jerry) Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I remember you fixing this post 3.0.14a correct ? Maybe
even post 3.0.15pre2.
Would one of you debian dudes retest the latest SAMBA_3_0
tree and let us know ?
Jerry, I grabbed SAMBA_3_0 from svn 2 hours ago and, while trying to
tags 308145 sid
thanks
Quoting Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: passwd
Version: 4.0.3-32
Severity: grave
The latest upload made 'passwd', which has priority 'required', depend
on 'debconf' which is not 'required', but only 'important'. This is wrong.
Hmmm, this is one of the
tags 308145 pending
thansk
Quoting Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: passwd
Version: 4.0.3-32
Severity: grave
The latest upload made 'passwd', which has priority 'required', depend
on 'debconf' which is not 'required', but only 'important'. This is wrong.
Among other things
(hope you follow the BTS, Matthijs, because mail to you bounces for
meprobably some broken MTA setup saying relaying denied to my MTA)
I have a standard smb configuration file. From a fresh installation. Can
you try with that configuration ? (The shares you have can go into the
smb.conf
I tried to build a Debian package for it to minimize work for Gabor,
but the compilation failed with an error I reported to Jerry Carter and
Jeremy. Let's just wait them to wake up if already back to USA from
the SambaXP conference.
More news about this, mostly for Gabor...
The compile
325910 was filed RC by Tollef on my request against passwd, to prevent
the 4.0.3-39 package to enter testing. This would completely break d-i
testing installs. Fortunately, for a reason I currently ignore,
4.0.3-39 did not enter testing yet.
Unfortunately for Ubuntu, they use unstable..:-)
Dato suggested rebuilding this package to have it follow the KDE
transition.
However, trying to do so (because I wanted to give it a try), I
failed:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX i486-linux-gnu-g++
-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500
I have no clue for solving thisso I will just give up..:-)
there is a patch for it:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=301274
sadly, the upstream author lags in answering...
I've just ping him again, and I'll see. If he doesn't answer,
I'll dpatch the beast while
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
so you've not yet upgraded to kdelibs4c2?
Well, this didn't seem to be mandatory but I'm pretty ignorant of this
issue. Remember that I just wanted to have a look at this software ..:-)
Or have I missed something on the road?
I've 2 problems to
Package: lowmem
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
After the initial lowmem screen warning about the low memory mode, the
language selection screen is still showed, allowing the user to choose
another language.
Then, later in the install, the system loops and
tags 329175 patch
thanks
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: lowmem
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
After the initial lowmem screen warning about the low memory mode, the
language selection screen is still showed, allowing the user
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: hunglish
Version: 1.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: makes package uninstallable
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a
problem with your package:
Setting up hunglish
severity 398428 important
thanks
Quoting Jerome Alet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: samba
Version: smbpasswd breaks passwd.tdb
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
While trying to change my daughter's password from Windows 2K
(Ctrl+Alt+Suppr) she lost her connection
a RC bug
+ * Depend on console-common as the postinst uses install-keymap
+Closes: #398393
+
+ -- Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:53:27 +0100
+
hunglish (1.13-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload to fix longstanding l10n issues
diff -Nru hunglish
Simon, are there plans to fix this FTBFS bug?
I went on it while looking at packages that have longstanding l10n
issues (usually debconf translations) for the NMU campaign aimed at
fixing these trivial bugs (see http://people.debian.org/~lwall/i18n/).
However, this FTBFS prevents any firther
tags 398558 pending
thanks
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: remstats-servers
Version: 1.0.13a-6.1
Severity: serious
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a
problem with your package:
Setting up remstats-servers
Preconfiguring packages ...
gradm failed to preconfigure, with exit status 30
(Reading database ... 229400 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace gradm 1.9.15-2 (using .../gradm_1.9.15-2.1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gradm ...
Setting up gradm (1.9.15-2.1)
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: remstats
Version: 1.0.13a-6.1
Severity: serious
Usertags: grid5000
(Ccing Christian since he might want to fix that one as well)
Will trysigh...:-)
Hi,
During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a
problem
An exit code of 30 happens if the message isn't displayed to the user.
Since the input happens at critical priority in debconf, the obvious
explanation would have been that you were using the non-interactive
frontend. The config script is buggy anyway, since the question will only
be
Pre-Depends are not guaranteed to be installed at purge time, only essential
packages are. This cleanup needs to either happen in the postrm remove
target instead of in the purge target, or it needs to be done conditionally
on purge, depending on the nature of the clean-up.
Then moving the
No, it exits because db_input is supposed to *display* it to the user as
necessary, and the return value informs the caller whether this is actually
done -- in the general case you get a 30 return /after/ it's been shown to
the user, since the first time it's called is normally when it does
Pre-Depends are not guaranteed to be installed at purge time, only essential
packages are. This cleanup needs to either happen in the postrm remove
target instead of in the purge target, or it needs to be done conditionally
on purge, depending on the nature of the clean-up.
I think I'll
Quoting Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
BTW, given the contents of this debconf message, is it better to remove the
package anyway...?
Ouch, I should have noted all debconf translators that this package is
_deprecated_ and it
Well, the problem here is that Asterisk by default attempts to load the
module if it is installed, and if the ports are not configured as
described in the debconf note, loading the module will fail and Asterisk
will refuse to start. This is an essential feature (so you won't run a
half-broken
tags 396226 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
We had previously never run a kernel with ACL support enabled. Since
the upgrade, we are seeing very strange permission behavior. It appears
to berelated to POSIX ACL support in Samba.
It seems that what's happening is this.
We have a
I went on this bug report where Andreas adds a debconf template as
part of his patch to fix the RC issue.
I'd like to recommend following the writing style in the Developer's
Reference and remove the dot at the end of the new template short
description and turn the new template into an error
My understanding is that removing this package from etch should fix
that bug. Am I right ?
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting David Gil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
tags 398619 + pending
tags 395055 + pending
thanks
I think the best solution right now is depending on all cmdline clients
supported by the package, until a best solution is adopted. I will
follow the progress of bugs like #353617 and #398634.
I am
Quoting David Gil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
El sáb, 25-11-2006 a las 17:58 +0100, Christian Perrier escribió:
I'm building the package and I'll upload
Thanks Christian, my sponsor has already done it.
OK, thenI attempted the upload as well, which means that a REJECT
message will probably
Steve, Peter, Noèl, Eloy?
manty also, if you come up with a patch..:-)
A build-conflict with the -dev package should be sufficient, shouldn't it?
I have a package that's ready with this change only. See SVN.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Michael Biebl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.23d-2
Severity: serious
Samba was linked against libgnutls11, which has been removed from the
archive. This makes the package uninstallable.
I'll take care of this. Sounds like *not* building was pbuilder turned
out
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Quoting Michael Biebl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.23d-2
Severity: serious
Samba was linked against libgnutls11, which has been removed from the
archive. This makes the package uninstallable.
I'll take care
I went on this bug during the l10n NMU campaign, found the patch,
compiled the packagetested it and it installs fine.
Therefore, I'll soon upload a NMU.
Thanks, Alex for the patch...
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The NMU patch is attached to this mail.
The NMU changelog is:
Source: pmk
Version: 0.9.3s2-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 20:35:28 +0100
Closes: 316871 328362 395736
Changes:
pmk (0.9.3s2-2.1) unstable; urgency
bts tags 358321 pending
thanks
Quoting Adam Conrad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: ttf-freefont
Version: 20060126b-2
Severity: serious
Since the switch to using cdbs for this package, it no longer
builds from source, since you *cough* forgot the build-dep.
Hmmm, /me beats self with a
severity 359035 serious
merge 359035 359634
thanks
It appears that this issue has already been reported
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
To workaround this bug, please remove the quotes around the LANGUAGE
variable value in /etc/default/locale
I suggest upgrading this bug to RC...
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 361242 serious
tags 361242 pending
merge 361242 361091
thanks
I didn't noticed this bug already had been reported.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Gustavo Franco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
I NMUed console-data in our current BSP, it was uploaded to gluck
(1-day) but was accepted today and vorlon noticed. Anyway, the
exact patch is attached to this message.
I have incorporated changes from your NMU in the SVN.
Sorry for having
Quoting Adam Borowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package uninstallable
The debconf question xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping
is needed by xserver-xorg's preinst, yet its template is missing. Without
Right, I'm not really sure why Daniel removed the template in the ubuntu
stuff. I'll look in to it and possibly add it back. Removing it will go
well with my ultimate plan to dismember dexconf though, so that'll be my
preference if it's something sensible.
In such case, I suggest you let me
Sweet! Let's just kill it then. I'll add some code to the postinst to
remove the questions all together. Christian, let's just make it dead and
give the translators a little rest :-)
Ack. They will love this..:)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Emphasis there on 'should'. Fabio found some problems so ended up
adding the default ZAM back, but I don't know whether or not that's
resolved in current CVS.
OK. Well, in case the template is re-added, I suggest pinging me or
grabbed the old translations from the PO files in the 6.9 branch:
tags 367194 pending
thanks
As trivial at it looks, here is the patch that should fix the issue:
Actually, I had commited a fix, but forgot to tag the bug accordingly.
The fix completely changes Build-Depends-Indep in
Build-Depends...because the dependency on po-debconf is needed as we
run
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 18:31, you wrote:
The attached patch adds some basic checks so we do not just go ahead
Sorry. Attached the wrong patch. This one is better.
Well, even though I'm not fond of new strings so late in the release
process, I
Quoting Grégoire Druant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: grave
Aptitude ignores -t option or its long version --target-release.
It will allways install the unstable version of the packages I try to
install.
If I try aptitude install package -t blablabla,
I just built a new upstream version of ttf-freefont. As Konstantinos
is mostly away currently, I wanted to give a try for getting a new
version in as the graphical installer could benefit it.
I am not at all a font guy...I just took some time to build this new
version.
Can people who
(removing debian-boot)
[IMHO the most reliable way to test the 'line spacing' issue is to use
Openoffice 2.0; just select some text, and change the font between e.g.
Times New Roman and Freeserif.]
Hmmm, doing so gives me what is probably this line spacing problem. A
random text switched
I'm afraid I can't reproduce this bug in my own chroot, whether it
uses shadow passwords or notin both cases, heartbeat installs
well:
Is the bug really about heartbeat not *installing* properly?
There are a few weird messages but nothing really preventing the
package to install.
[EMAIL
Quoting Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: ttf-freefont
Version: 20051206-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'ttf-freefont' on unstable, I get the following error:
./convertfonts.sh
make: execvp: ./convertfonts.sh: Permission denied
make: *** [build-stamp] Error
Quoting Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, I can only confirm this problem. However I really fail to see why
this should be release critical. One may certainly tag it as important
but I somewhat object to it being grave.
It makes the font
reopen 254113
severity 254113 important
thanks
Last discussions have shown that #254113 is not fixed.
however, I keep thinking it is not RC
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Nicolas François ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello,
After #351631, shadow was compiled with SELinux support.
This unfortunately broke some shadow utilities (passwd, chfn, chage,
chsh) when /proc is not mounted (#352494).
This is caused by selinux_check_passwd_access(), which returns -1
Package: preseed
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file...even for not
preseeded installs.
I found this while running a standard install with the sid_d-i netinst of
20060224.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Quoting Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:14:18PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file...
even for not preseeded installs.
From which location does it try to fetch a preseed file? (file: ? http
Looking closer at the logs, I see that dhclient.leases is used.
Here's this file in my vmware virtual machine while it runs th
einstaller:
lease {
interface eth0;
fixed-address 192.168.7.128;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option routers 192.168.7.2;
option domain-name-servers
I cannot reproduce this with either sid_d-i 20060224 or 20060225, so there
must be something in your local situation that causes this.
Well, my vmware setup didn't change in last weeks..:-)
The DHCP server setup is typical Vmware:
#
# Configuration file for ISC 2.0b6pl1 vmnet-dhcpd
tags 354339 patch
thanks
Quoting Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:25:23PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Running it seems to trigger network-preseed.postinst, which I made
set -x as suggested.
The result is that attached log file. It features a first
I fail to understand why this issue, which seems trivial, is not yet
fixed.
I went on it while trying to build a custom openswan on my system and
I hereby propose to quickly build a NMU to fix this FTBFS.
However, as openswan seems quite actively maintained, there may be
good reasons for not
Quoting Rene Mayrhofer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Am Monday 13 March 2006 11:08 schrieb Christian Perrier:
I fail to understand why this issue, which seems trivial, is not yet
fixed.
Honestly, lack of time
I went on it while trying to build a custom openswan on my system and
I hereby
Quoting Rene Mayrhofer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Am Thursday 16 March 2006 08:06 schrieb Christian Perrier:
Attached is the patch for the NMU I just uploaded in the DELAYED/2-day
queue (to give you some opportunity to block it in case you disagree
with a part of it).
Thanks - the diff
It seems that I've been unlucky while fixing a few bugs in zhcon in
a NMUand then created a RC bug (which would anyway have existed).
This is why I just uploaded another NMU with just one change:
build-depends on unicon-imc2
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The bug is in slapd for including this text in its debconf template:
The default is /var/backups/slapd-VERSION
This comes under the heading of not referring to debconf UI in a
template. Just as you don't know how debconf will choose to present a
yes/no question and thus say yes
Quoting Michal Wrobel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: poedit
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: normal
Package libwxgtk2.5.3 is not available:
Hmmm, there may have been some movement on WxWindows stuff in
unstable.
Ron, any input for me ? This is not release critical as I never
allowed this build
I finally managed to build samba packages with current upstream SVN
sources, which , according to Jerry Carter, fix the Win XP file
listing bug.
To the bug submitter : coul dyou please test this with the packages
you'll find at:
http://www.perrier.eu.org/debian/packages/
signature.asc
severity 309003 important
thanks
Quoting Michael Lueck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.14a-1
Severity: serious
Thanks for getting Samba in Debian up to the 3.0.14 level. Sadly there was a
bug introduced between 3.0.11 and 3.0.14.
Please all people affected by #302771 (Win XP file listing bug in
smbclient and libsmbclient) test the packages I built. Here's what I
wrote on 2005/05/11:
I finally managed to build samba packages with current upstream SVN
sources, which , according to Jerry Carter, fix the Win XP file
listing
I blindly tried to reproduce that bug on a quadri Xeon server running
sarge and was unable to reproduce it.
Note that I have absolutely no understanding of the bug issue. I was
just wandering through RC bugs
Anyway, I think the bug severity is overflated:
grave
makes the package in
Quoting Ludovic Drolez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: smbclient
Version: 2.2.3a-14.1
Severity: grave
Oh nice...seems that the release schedule is triggering RC bug
reports.:-(
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi !
We use smbclient to backup Windows systems with backuppc.
Ludovic,
What is the target system ? The bug you report slightly sounds like
#302771, especially if the target is an XP system.
Could you also try to list a directory with less than 32 entries?
If needed please ping either me (bubulle) or Steve (vorlon) on IRC
irc.debian.org.
--
1 - 100 of 737 matches
Mail list logo
