Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912240 in gentlyweb-utils reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912273 in unsafe-mock reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: fixed -1
Control: close -1
This issue has been fixed with plexus-utils2/3.1.0-4
going to be reverted to non usrmerged. For this reason I'm
lowering the severity.
> In any case the scriplet replaced by the patch is buggy.
> How about pushing this patch upstream?
The patch looks good to me, thanks a lot. Do you know if readlink is
commonly available on other Unix platforms?
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #898821 in maven-plugin-tools reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Le 22/11/2018 à 15:45, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> This issue has been "solved" upstream in the version 3.6 by dropping
> support for javadoc annotations. This means we have to convert the
> plugins still using these javadoc annotations to use the Java
> annotations inste
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #906350 in doxia reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912516 in libcommons-lang3-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
This issue has been "solved" upstream in the version 3.6 by dropping
support for javadoc annotations. This means we have to convert the
plugins still using these javadoc annotations to use the Java
annotations instead [2].
[1]
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #914177 in plexus-utils2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: severity -1 normal
The license changed in the version 2.1.1 because the project was donated
to the Eclipse Foundation. There is no code change between the version
2.1 under the CDDL+GPL and the version 2.1.1 under the EPL+GPL. So it's
still correct to state that the code is licensed
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #901516 in sbt-serialization reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #901523 in sbt-template-resolver reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #901522 in scala-pickling reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #901520 in scopt reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
ds fine with
antlr 4.6. Could you give it a try? If it works that would allow us to
move forward without waiting for antlr 4.7.
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #894791 in sbt-launcher-interface reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #895986 in sbt-test-interface reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #893456 in jawn reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #893453 in json4s reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #913577 in java-allocation-instrumenter reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
IKVM has been abandoned upstream [1] and it looks unlikely to be ported
to Java 11+ in the near future.
ikvm has no reverse dependencies and a low popcon, maybe the package
should be removed?
[1] http://weblog.ikvm.net/#a33ea525f-a291-418a-bd6a-abdf22d0662b
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #913402 in tomcat8 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #911183 in logback reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tags -1 + patch
I sent a merge request on Salsa [1]. It's only build tested, please
check if it's also ok at runtime.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/scilab/merge_requests/2
Later the build fails when generating the javadoc, because the
"--add-modules=java.activation,java.xml.bind" option was specified to
build with Java 9, but these modules have been removed in Java 11.
severity 908884 important
fixed 908884 8.5.35-1
close 908884
With javax.activation.jar added to the classpath the build now fails due
to the removal of JAXB:
[javac] import javax.xml.bind.JAXBContext;
[javac] ^
[javac]
/build/scilab-6.0.1/modules/xcos/src/java/org/scilab/modules/xcos/palette/PaletteManager.java:27:
error:
The @Generated annotations can be safely removed, they only have a
documentation purpose at the source level.
But after removing them there is another issue related to the removal
of the javax.activation API in Java 11:
[javac]
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912433 in libgoogle-gson-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: retitle -1 libcommons-lang3-java FTBFS with easymock 4.0
Control: user debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 - default-java11
This is actually a regression caused by easymock 4.0 which was recently
uploaded. The package builds fine with OpenJDK 11 and easymock 3.6
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #911194 in libbtm-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912389 in snakeyaml reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #913052 in hsqldb reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
mple. So I think
I'll rather aim at a minor update simply adding the dependency on
libactivation-java, and later look at an upgrade.
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912515 in libcommons-collections3-java reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912477 in libcommons-collections4-java reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912359 in msv reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912351 in stax-ex reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912468 in java3d reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912394 in rsyntaxtextarea reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #911136 in javatools reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912543 in libnetx-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912458 in jftp reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912470 in jmdns reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912455 in istack-commons reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912352 in saaj reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912357 in metro-policy reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912372 in libswingx-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912466 in jaxb-api reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #911995 in icedtea-web reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912464 in icedtea-web reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On 01/11/2018 01:54, tony mancill wrote:
> I am definitely open to (and appreciative of) your suggestions.
Hi Tony, even if the jaxb package doesn't yet provide the xjc executable
(#905357), you can invoke it with:
java -jar /usr/share/java/jaxb-xjc.jar
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912474 in junit4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912233 in checkstyle reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: retitle: checkstyle: FTBFS with saxonhe 9.9.0
Control: user debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 - default-java11
This issue is actually caused by the upload of saxonhe 9.9.0 last week.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912268 in uimaj reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
openjdk-8 if there is a workaround with
openjdk-11. Building with openjdk-8 is really a last resort solution,
and very few cases justify its use (see lombok for a good example).
Emmanuel Bourg
ould no longer use the java.se.ee module, it was a temporary
module in Java 9 & 10 now removed in Java 11. jabref should add jaxb to
its classpath instead.
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912232 in carrotsearch-hppc reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
src:tomcat7 builds one package, libservlet3.0-java, which is only used
by eclipse. Once eclipse is removed tomcat7 will follow.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912234 in commons-httpclient reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
you,
Emmanuel Bourg
tches, sorry.
I'll file another bug for the build dependency.
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: reopen -1
Control: notfixed -1 0.7.1-7
Control: user debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 + default-java9
Control: tags -1 + sid buster fixed-upstream
I'm reopening the bug because the compatibility with Java 9 and later
wasn't really fixed, the JDK was just reverted to
Le 27/10/2018 à 15:44, Dominik George a écrit :
> Patch against git master is attached. This happened during the BSP in
> Karlsruhe, so I will NMU to DELAYED/5 tomorrow before the BSP ends if you do
> not object, and also ask the release team about inclusion in the next point
> release.
Thank
ed mojo-executor and string-template-maven-plugin, they are
awaiting in the NEW queue for the FTP masters approval. Thanks a lot
Andrius.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 19/10/2018 à 17:14, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> I have cloned
>
>https://salsa.debian.org/merkys-guest/mojo-executor
>
> to
>
>https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/mojo-executor
>
> where it should reside when maintained in Java Team. :-)
@Andreas: We have a script [1] to create the
rnings can be ignored, this is a javadoc issue to be
fixed at the openjdk level (if ever fixed).
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #910836 in eclipse-platform-ui reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #878800 in eclipse-jgit reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Le 17/10/2018 à 07:11, Timo Aaltonen a écrit :
> ldapjdk is built against jdk8 because jss/dogtag-pki still need it that
> way or things will break. Though now I realized maybe it might still
> work with -Dant.build.javac.target=1.8 (or whatever jdk8 uses).
What errors do you get if you use the
Le 13/10/2018 à 00:32, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> - tycho (through aether again), I'm working on an upgrade no longer
> depending on it
The tycho update is ready but requires equinox-p2 which is still in NEW.
> - libgpars-groovy-java which is used by groovy. I don't have a
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #905860 in libgpars-groovy-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
netty-3.9:
- maven-indexer (through aether), but it isn't used and could be removed
- tycho (through aether again), I'm working on an upgrade no longer
depending on it
- libgpars-groovy-java which is used by groovy. I don't have a solution
for this one yet.
Emmanuel Bourg
The javax.xml.bind errors can be simply fixed by adding a dependency
on jaxb-api:
--- a/repository/build.gradle
+++ b/repository/build.gradle
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
compile project(':base:common')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-compress:1.8.1'
compile 'com.google.jimfs:jimfs:1.1'
+
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #906336 in bintray-client-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + help
Downgrading the severity, upstream doesn't support non x86 architectures
and the packages are only provided as a best effort.
Control: tags -1 + pending
The plugin is being removed
Control: tags -1 + patch
The fix is ready to be merged on Salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/a11y-team/brailleutils/merge_requests/1
user debian-j...@lists.debian.org
usertag 897482 + default-java10
retitle 897482 brailleutils: FTBFS with Java 10 due to return type change of
javax.xml.namespace.NamespaceContext.getPrefixes()
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #906364 in insubstantial reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #880888 in maven-enforcer reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: severity -1 wishlist
I'm downgrading the severity because this isn't actionable for now
(implementation suggestions are welcome) and we need
gradle-debian-helper 2.0 and gradle 4.4 in testing. The source/target
level of the affected packages should be updated separately.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #907359 in libandroid-json-org-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: reassign -1 src:libandroid-json-org-java 20121204-20090211-3
Control: affects -1 src:minify-maven-plugin
Control: retitle -1 libandroid-json-org-java: Missing 'debian' version
This issue appeared with the upload of
libandroid-json-org-java/20121204-20090211-3 two months ago. The generic
Package: cbmc
Severity: serious
Tags: sid buster
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java10
cbmc build-depends on openjdk-8-jdk that we plan to remove in Buster,
it should use default-jdk instead.
Source: ldapjdk
Severity: serious
Tags: patch sid buster
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java10
ldapjdk build-depends on openjdk-8-jdk that we aim to remove in Buster,
it should use default-jdk instead. So far nothing prevents ldapjdk from
building with more recent JDKs, it's
Control; severity -1 important
Downgrading the severity, upstream doesn't support non x86 architectures
and the packages are only provided as a best effort.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #910230 in javabeans-activation-framework reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
y it out and report back that would be great.
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #908166 in swt-gtk reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #906375 in libxml-security-java reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #906370 in jmock2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #873213 in aspectj reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
This is actually an issue with lombok not supporting Java 10. It was
fixed with the upload of lombok/1.16.22-1.
radle-debian-helper isn't to blame here, I think jayway-jsonpath is
simply missing a build dependency on default-jdk-doc (or should disable
the generation of the javadoc since it's doesn't create a doc package).
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: reassign -1 jarwrapper
Control: affects -1 davmail
This is a jarwrapper bug, the CheckProperty class was compiled without
specifying the source/target level, thus defaulting to Java 10 bytecode
(version 54.0).
Control: fixed -1 6.2.1-1
Control: close -1
It looks like the upgrade to the version 6.2.1 fixed this issue.
Control: reassign -1 gradle-debian-helper 2.0
Control: affects -1 src:jayway-jsonpath
Control: affects -1 src:bnd
Le 17/09/2018 à 00:54, Ivo De Decker a écrit :
> The latest version of jayway-jsonpath in unstable fails on all:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=jayway-jsonpath
201 - 300 of 774 matches
Mail list logo
