Bug#553496: doc-central: diff for NMU version 1.8.2+num3

2010-02-20 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Hey there,

shouldn't even have to use a delayed queue, Stefano! After the lousy 
care I've been giving doc-central for years, you surely could have gone 
for a straight NMU, particularly because I've also been on the 
http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu list since forever. =)

I've just responded to a ping from Mats in private, and, like I just
told him in that email, I'm letting the NMU in and acknowledging it in 
the next maintainer upload (hopefully soon).

Thanks a lot for the attention to this bug!

Best regards,

Guilherme



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#386220: Updated patch

2006-09-30 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
package gchangepass
tag 386220 pending
kthxbye

Em Sáb, 2006-09-30 às 13:51 +0200, Vincent Zweije escreveu:
 On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:51:31AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
 
 ||  attached is a more uptodate patch, but as I am not very happy with it I 
 won't
 ||  do an NMU immediatly to give you a change to fix it on your own. 
 Otherwise it
 ||  will be uploaded on the BSP next week.
 
 So... it's now three weeks later... where is it? *poke* *prod*

It's waiting on other upstream fixes and shall be uploaded soon.




Bug#387063: Fix uploaded to delayed

2006-09-16 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
A non-maintainer upload with the following patch has been uploaded to
DELAYED-2 (as per the requirement of the bug being filed for 7 days of
the 0-day NMU policy):

--- xchat-2.6.4/debian/changelog2006-09-16 11:49:12.0 -0300
+++ xchat-2.6.4.new/debian/changelog2006-09-16 11:48:46.386168750 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+xchat (2.6.4-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Sourceful upload to make this installable again (Closes: #387063)
+  * debian/control:
+- build-depend on dpkg-dev = 1.13.19
+- make xchat depend on xchat-common (= ${source:Version})
+
+ -- Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sat, 16 Sep 2006 11:48:39 -0 
300
+
 xchat (2.6.4-2) unstable; urgency=low

   * The End of a nightmare release.
--- xchat-2.6.4/debian/control  2006-09-16 11:49:12.0 -0300
+++ xchat-2.6.4.new/debian/control  2006-09-16 11:48:52.134528000 -0300
@@ -3,13 +3,13 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Davide Puricelli (evo) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
-Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4), bison, libssl-dev, libglib2.0-dev, 
libgtk2.0-d ev (= 2.0.6-1), libperl-dev, gettext (= 0.10.37-1), libtool, 
zlib1g-dev, perl (= 5.8), python2.4-dev, tcl8.4-dev, autotools-dev, dpatch, 
libdbus-glib-1-dev, libgtkspell-dev, gconf2
+Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4), bison, libssl-dev, libglib2.0-dev, 
libgtk2.0-d ev (= 2.0.6-1), libperl-dev, gettext (= 0.10.37-1), libtool, 
zlib1g-dev, perl (= 5.8), python2.4-dev, tcl8.4-dev, autotools-dev, dpatch, 
libdbus-glib-1-dev, libgtkspell-dev, gconf2, dpkg-dev (= 1.13.19)

 Package: xchat
 Architecture: any
 Provides: irc
 Replaces: xchat-gnome ( 1:0.11-1), xchat-common ( 1.6.0-1)
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, xchat-common (= ${Source-Version})
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, xchat-common (= ${source:Version})
 Suggests: libnet-google-perl
 Conflicts: xchat-gnome ( 1:0.11-1)
 Description: IRC client for X similar to AmIRC




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#360713: and RC bug

2006-04-23 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Let's please get this bug fixed? OK, informing upstream and getting them
to fix it appropriately is nice, but that's not a reason for stop to
keep failing meanwhile. Just say you're fine with it and I'll NMU, or
prepare a fixed package and I'll be happy to sponsor it.

Cheers,

--
Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#364254: fixing xscreensaver RC bug

2006-04-23 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Hi Ralf,

do you care for some help with fixing this bug? I can either sponsor the
upload of a package prepared by you to fix it or NMU it, as long as you
approve it.

Cheers,

-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#361004: carpaltunnel NMU'd

2006-04-23 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
tag 361004 pending
kthxbye

Hi,

as we are currently in Bug-Squashing Party period (see
debian-devel-announce), and your package contained an RC bug unanswered
to, it has been NMUd. The package has been uploaded to tfheen's delayed
queue, though, and you have until approximately an hour before today's
dinstall to react and remove it from there if you're not ok with it.

And thank Paul Wise for the patch =)

Cheers,


-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#359745: webalizer RC bug

2006-04-23 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Do you need someone to sponsor the upload? If you send me the package
today, I can do it for you.

Cheers,

-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#364080: xpaint RC bug

2006-04-23 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
tag 364080 pending
kthxbye

Hi,

as we are trying to clean up after the X11R7 transition and a
bug-squashing party is taking place this weekend, I have prepared a
non-maintainer upload for this FTBFS bug. It has been uploaded to the
DELAYED-4 queue, though, so you have time to react if you do not like
the idea. If you are for it, on the other hand, I can move it straight
into the actual upload queue.

Cheers,

-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#345450: Upload pending

2006-04-14 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
tag 345450 pending
tag 357885 pending
quit

Just as a status update, the upload that fixes this bug is sitting in
the GNOME Team SVN repository, waiting for a fix for a problem involving
the GNOME libs and libXcursor.

We hope to have that sorted out soon, sorry.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Guilherme de S. Pastore
http://www.gnome.org/ * http://br.gnome.org/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#358295: Status update

2006-04-14 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Hi,

I do not really have an idea on what's going on here, specially
considering how old this release actually is. I have asked upstream
about it, and am currently waiting for a reply on the issue.

--
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#329212: fisg bug #329212

2005-12-24 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
tag 329212 patch
thanks dude

Hi there,

the segmentation fault reported in this bug happens because the log
fails to be parsed, hence, there is no user list, and it tries to index
NULL. This happens because the number of users is checked, but too late.
There is a simplish patch attached that fixes the problem by moving the
check up with some tweaks, so it is performed earlier, and before
everything blows up.

Cheers,

-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- src/fisg.c	2003-10-05 03:40:55.0 -0300
+++ src/fisg.c.new	2005-12-24 13:01:26.0 -0200
@@ -1336,6 +1336,15 @@
  	}
 
  /*
+  * Check if any users have been found
+  */
+ if (myStats-userList == NULL)
+ 	{
+ 	FERR(No users found? Check that you really specified correct log-format!\n);
+ 	return -10;
+ 	}
+
+ /*
   * Index the list for sorting
   */
  if (stats_index(myStats)  0)
@@ -1362,16 +1371,6 @@
  	return -10;
  	}
 
-
- /*
-  * Check number of users
-  */
- if (myStats-nUsers = 0)
- 	{
- 	FERR(No users found? Check that you really specified correct log-format!\n);
- 	return -10;
- 	}
-
  /* Calculate time */
  time(myTime2);
  myStats-nTimeElapsed = (myTime2 - myTime1);


Bug#329036: scorched3d: depends on libwxgtk2.4

2005-09-18 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Package: scorched3d
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

The subject/title says it all: libwxgtk2.4 has been removed from
unstable on July, 13th 2005, making scorched3d uninstallable.

-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313218: gtodo: Program refuses to load if a single todo item exists

2005-06-13 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Em Dom, 2005-06-12 s 15:04 +0100, Barrie Millar escreveu:

 After performing a security update this afternoon which also downloaded
 and installed Gnome 2.10, gtodo totally fails to restart if a single
 todo item is located on an existing list. It starts perfectly if a
 configuration cannot be found. However, add a single item, exit and then
 try to restart it, and you get the following error:
 
 Segmentation fault

I haven't yet upgraded to GNOME 2.10 in unstable, as it's still horribly
broken. With GNOME 2.8, I cannot reproduce your problem, though.
Therefore, I ask for your patience until GNOME 2.10 in unstable is
merely usable, so I can try to figure out what happens to be wrong.

 Could somebody also tell me how to output a package information view
 like those I see in other posts (sample shown below). I've had a look
 around, but can't see how it's done anywhere. Thanks

reportbug does that automagically for people who use it.

Regards,

-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Bug#307655: gtodo SIGSEGV

2005-05-08 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Em Dom, 2005-05-08 s 16:41 +0200, Vlada Macek escreveu:
 Hi,
 
 I've also experienced the segfault problem (same backtrace also). It is
 easily reproducible by me like this:
 
 1) delete the gtodo configuration (rm -rf ~/.gtodo)
 2) run gtodo and press Ctrl-E
 3) in the Edit Categories dialog delete ALL items
 4) press Close, SIGSEGV will immediatelly occur

Thanks a lot for the extremely valuable information!
I would have taken more time to figure it out, if it wasn't for you =)

Best regards,

--
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Bug#265045: unrar

2005-01-27 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Why is it better not to have it in Sarge? It works, doesn't it? Many
people use it currently, and would be extremely disappointed by its
removal (as it's already been removed, I've noticed signs of that).

You could check when upgrading if the old version is the one from
woody or prior ones and display a note through debconf, or add a
note to README.Debian... you have plenty of options but, please,
don't remove it.

Best regards,

-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Presume-se que a mulher deve esperar, imovel, ate ser 
cortejada. Mais ou menos como a aranha espera a 
mosca.
-- George Bernard Shaw


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#284117: gentoo's patch

2005-01-16 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Em Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:21:25 -0500,
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:

 Gentoo has a patch at:
 
   http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=43329
 
 I think only the last section is relevent; other parts are controlled
 only by the local user.
 
 Upstream is aware of the problem as of last week and is apparently
 working with gentoo on an update:
 
   http://prozilla.genesys.ro/

Upstream author, Kalum, is absolutely inactive for years, as I've
previously mentioned. We're upstream: people with access to some
resources (CVS, website, etc) working on prozilla.

 
 Free BSD links to a new version, though it may not be official:
 
   
 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2005-January/049000.html
 
 Here's someone who say's that they're waiting for upstream permission
 to release a new version, and who says he's working on a version 2
 rewrite:
 
   http://www.advogato.org/person/richdawe/

This guy is working with us on prozilla 1.3.7, probably the last
version before the 2.0 series. Believe me, I do know what's
going on out there. =P

-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Nada e mais perigoso que um bom conselho seguido de um mau 
exemplo.
--  Madame de Sable; escritora francesa. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]