Bug#901462: seabios: SeaBIOS fails to build from source on sid and testing

2018-07-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 - patch Apparently this is not so simple. As per upstream, https://mail.coreboot.org/pipermail/seabios/2018-July/012353.html - they say only particular versions of IASL produce correct code, more recent IASL produces instructions not understood by older OSes (which is what qemu abo

Bug#784070: Newly-created arrays don't auto-assemble - related to hostname change?

2016-11-23 Thread Michael Tokarev
23.11.2016 05:34, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22 2016, Andy Smith wrote: > >> Hi Neil, >> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:56:28AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: >>> Thanks. Sorry this is taking a lot of back-and-forth... >> >> No worries. This is very interesting to me and I'd also like to know >> what

Bug#922461: CVE-2018-20124

2019-02-16 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: notfound -1 1:3.1+dfsg-4 16.02.2019 15:41, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Source: qemu Severity: grave Tags: security When rdma was enabled in -3, this also made a fix for CVE-2018-20124 necessary: Yes indeed. But since this code has a ton of bugs (not only security) and is generally qui

Bug#916279: qemu-system-common: Overwrite /usr/share/doc-base/qemu-system-doc without declaring replacement

2019-01-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
01.01.2019 23:14, Laurent Bigonville wrote: On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:34:16 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: > it doesn't really break the package in question. All these > packages will be of the same version anwyway, upgraded in > one go, at the very max there will be some docs mi

Bug#916279: qemu-system-common: Overwrite /usr/share/doc-base/qemu-system-doc without declaring replacement

2019-01-03 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 minor 02.01.2019 1:03, Laurent Bigonville wrote: Le 1/01/19 à 21:35, Michael Tokarev a érit : []>>> Well this bug has been reopened that mean that the package will never migrate That's sort of unfortunate... Indeed, it would be unfortunate to not have

Bug#1036110: qemu-system-*: license conflict with libsasl2

2023-05-15 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Control: found -1 1:3.0+dfsg-1 15.05.2023 19:49, Bastian Germann wrote: Source: qemu Version: 1:7.2+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Hi, the qemu-system-* binaries depends on libsasl2-2, which is licensed under CMU's BSD-3-Clause-Attribution license and covered by the RSA-MD

Bug#1036110: qemu-system-*: license conflict with libsasl2

2023-05-15 Thread Michael Tokarev
15.05.2023 19:49, Bastian Germann wrote: the qemu-system-* binaries depends on libsasl2-2, which is licensed under CMU's BSD-3-Clause-Attribution license and covered by the RSA-MD license. They have clauses in place, which are known to be incompatible with GPL (as far as I can see the mentioned

Bug#1036110: qemu-system-*: license conflict with libsasl2

2023-05-15 Thread Michael Tokarev
15.05.2023 20:50, Michael Tokarev wrote: 15.05.2023 19:49, Bastian Germann wrote: the qemu-system-* binaries depends on libsasl2-2, which is licensed under CMU's BSD-3-Clause-Attribution license and covered by the RSA-MD license. They have clauses in place, which are known to be incompa

Bug#1030545: qemu: qemu-img and qemu-system-s390x hang on s390x

2023-02-04 Thread Michael Tokarev
04.02.2023 23:19, Hilko Bengen wrote: Package: src:qemu Version: 1:7.2+dfsg-2 .. qemu-img create -f qcow2 -o preallocation=metadata blank-disk-1s.qcow2 512 would hang in what appears a tight loop (100% CPU). Does 7.2+dfsg-1 work? I don't have s390x environment so have no way to deal wi

Bug#1030545: qemu: qemu-img and qemu-system-s390x hang on s390x

2023-02-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
04.02.2023 23:48, Hilko Bengen wrote: .. Does 7.2+dfsg-1 work? I don't have s390x environment so have no way to deal with this one. No, it doesn't. On the porterbox (zelenka.debian.org) I was only able to install 1:7.2+dfsg-1+b1 without rebuilding. Oh, I forgot about zelenka. Tried that one

Bug#1030545: qemu: qemu-img and qemu-system-s390x hang on s390x

2023-02-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + help Control: found -1 1:5.2+dfsg-11+deb11u2 05.02.2023 20:30, Michael Tokarev wrote: .. The thing is: I can't find *any* working version of qemu-img, they all hang like described.  This includes 1:7.2+dfsg-1+b1 too. There's more: I installed bullseye on zelenka,

Bug#1030545: qemu: qemu-img and qemu-system-s390x hang on s390x

2023-02-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
So, many previous versions behave the same, including bullseye. However. 1. I was able to create a 512-bytes qcow2 file once in /home/mjt on zelenka. And. 2. All versions always work fine in /tmp, on a tmpfs. Is it possible that the tests were running on a tmpfs before? /mjt

Bug#1030545: qemu: qemu-img and qemu-system-s390x hang on s390x

2023-02-06 Thread Michael Tokarev
In the build logs for libguestfs, I see last successful builds were done on 5.10.0-20-s390x kernel, and on 5.10.0-21-s390x, all builds fails. 5.10.0-21-s390x is the one running on zelenka too. It looks to me like a kernel issue.. /mjt

Bug#1030545: qemu: qemu-img and qemu-system-s390x hang on s390x

2023-02-09 Thread Michael Tokarev
So, we tried to reproduce it on a different machine at IBM. The problem doesn't show itself there. I asked the debian admin team to reboot zelenka into 5.10.0-20 kernel to verify, - there was no answer so far. So I'm leaving this as it is now. If the next kernel update will not fix the issue, I

Bug#1027166: rc.local should NOT depend on network-online or anything else

2022-12-28 Thread Michael Tokarev
Package: systemd Version: 252.2-2~bpo11+1 Severity: serious I just come across a situation where my notebook does not let me in while I'm in a place where network is not available. This is entirely wrong. After a painful debugging session, I found the debian-shipped file /lib/systemd/system/rc-loc

Bug#1026213: login: $HOME created as 0755 by default

2022-12-16 Thread Michael Tokarev
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:50:18 + debian user wrote: Package: login Version: 1:4.13+dfsg1-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@localhost.lan, Debian Security Team Dear Maintainer, please uncomment the line in /etc/login.defs that currently sa

Bug#1026387: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#1026387: samba-ad-provision: missing Breaks+Replaces: samba (<< 2:4.17.3+dfsg-4)

2022-12-19 Thread Michael Tokarev
19.12.2022 14:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Package: samba-ad-provision Version: 2:4.17.3+dfsg-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'testing'. It installed fine in 'testing', then the u

Bug#1026387: samba-ad-provision: missing Breaks+Replaces: samba (<< 2:4.17.3+dfsg-4)

2022-12-19 Thread Michael Tokarev
19.12.2022 16:32, Michael Tokarev wrote: .. Aargh.  This is due to my attempts to upload security update without waiting for the NEW processing. It *had* proper Breaks+Replaces, but I removed it all in an attempt to clean up new package introduction. Actually it's a lie, it has nothing

Bug#978131: qemu-system-x86: Segfault when starting a VM

2020-12-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Control: severity -1 normal 26.12.2020 15:10, Charles Malaheenee wrote: Package: qemu-system-x86 Version: 1:5.2+dfsg-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: malahee...@gmx.fr Dear Maintainer, Not sure is it related with

Bug#979322: libcacard: missing runtime glib2.0 dependency?

2021-01-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
05.01.2021 13:44, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Source: libcacard Version: 1:2.8.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, libglib2.0-dev looks missing on -dev package? pkg-config --short-errors --print-errors --cflags --libs "libcacard >= 2.5.1" Package 'glib-2.0', required by 'libcacard', not found I gue

Bug#979322: libcacard: missing runtime glib2.0 dependency?

2021-01-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
05.01.2021 13:44, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: ... after installing it looks still missing Package 'libpcsclite', required by 'libcacard', not found Oh. I missed this one. Will do another upload. /mjt

Bug#972789: qemu: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: /<>/linux-user/m68k/signal.c:44:1: error: ‘TYPE_CANONICAL’ is not compatible

2020-10-23 Thread Michael Tokarev
23.10.2020 19:50, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Source: qemu Version: 1:5.1+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) binNMUs of qemu for the libbrlapi transition failed to build on armel and armhf: | /<>/lin

Bug#969074: [PATCH] d/p/lp-1894129-*: fix FTBFS (LP: #1894129 Closes: #969074)

2020-12-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
30.11.2020 23:27, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi all, Christian, On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:40:11 +0200 Christian Ehrhardt wrote: Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt --- ...raseReserved-override-driver-queue_p.patch | 74 ...BlockEraseReserved-skip-unless-iSCSI.patch | 39 ...e-Write-ove

Bug#976919: edk2: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): Could not detected HOST_ARCH from uname results

2020-12-09 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: tag -1 wishlist 09.12.2020 11:59, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: edk2 Version: 2020.08-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el Hi, During a rebuild of all packages i

Bug#849884: qemu-kvm: USB host device pass through causes instant VM poweroff

2017-01-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 normal Control: reassign -1 qemu-system-x86 02.01.2017 02:54, Kyle Gordon wrote: > Package: qemu-kvm > Version: 1:2.1+dfsg-12+deb8u6 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > Dear Maintainer, > > Over the course of the past few weeks, a guest KVM inst

Bug#852302: ipxe-qemu: Crash with QEMU newer than 2.6

2017-01-23 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 serious 23.01.2017 15:40, Charles Malaheenee wrote: > Package: ipxe-qemu > Version: 1.0.0+git-20161027.b991c67-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > > Dear Maintainer, > > It's not possible to PXE boot in QEMU at all. When we choose --pxe option in > virt-install (or virt

Bug#853973: qemu: QEMU user mode emulation on PowerPC fails to run i386 executables.

2017-02-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 normal 02.02.2017 19:13, Steven Gawroriski wrote: > Package: qemu > Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-2 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software > > Dear Maintainer, > > For QEMU user mode, attempting to run i386 executables on a PowerPC > host fails. > > Running e

Bug#841546: seabios: FTBFS: src/stacks.c:635: Error: found '(', expected: ')'

2016-10-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible 21.10.2016 16:30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: seabios > Version: 1.8.2-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: stretch sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161021 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of

Bug#841546: seabios: FTBFS: src/stacks.c:635: Error: found '(', expected: ')'

2016-10-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo unreproducible + confirmed 25.10.2016 14:44, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [] Compile checking build/bios/src/stacks.o src/stacks.c: Assembler messages: src/stacks.c:635: Error: found '(', expected: ')' src/stacks.c:635: Error: junk `(%ebp))' after expressi

Bug#837574: Patch for the qemu PIE FTBFS

2016-10-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
25.10.2016 11:31, Adrian Bunk wrote: > -LD_REL := $(CC) -nostdlib -Wl,-r $(LD_REL_FLAGS) > +LD_REL := $(CC) -nostdlib -r $(LD_REL_FLAGS) Adrian, can you elaborate on this a bit please? I'm not sure of the possible consequences of this. Is this change good to be used upstream? Does it work the sam

Bug#929067: Support for MDS

2019-05-20 Thread Michael Tokarev
20.05.2019 16:07, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi FTR, https://salsa.debian.org/qemu-team/qemu/merge_requests/6 for the related changes in unstable (and to target buster). Yeah, I comitted it the same day this issue popped up, but forgot to push it (done now). Thanks! /mjt

Bug#1005642: possible gross file corruption due to windows client cache poisoning

2022-02-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
Package: samba Version: 2:4.13.13+dfsg-1~deb11u2 Severity: critical Tags: patch upstream Please see https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2022-February/239548.html and https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2022-February/239577.html for the description of the problem and how serious can it be, this

Bug#992158: Race in ifup maybe related to brctl failure in pre-up of network interface

2021-08-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 08:28:41 + Roman Fiedler wrote: Package: bridge-utils Version: 1.7-1 Severity: serious When running "brctl addbr" and "ip link set [if] address" immediately afterwards, the second command will fail to apply the address change. This is somehow annoying as the MAC would b

Bug#993658: qemu-user-static does not work through binfmt since 6.0

2021-09-04 Thread Michael Tokarev
04.09.2021 14:33, Vincent Bernat wrote: > Package: qemu-user-static > Version: 1:6.1+dfsg-4 > Severity: critical > Hey! Since 6.0, qemu-user-static does not seem to work properly through binfmt. I am a bit lost on how to diagnose that: ... When invoked through binfmt, the binaries seem to go f

Bug#953530: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#953530: samba-common-bin: post-install fails with "lock directory /run/samba does not exist"

2022-03-23 Thread Michael Tokarev
23.03.2022 16:38, Diederik de Haas wrote: On woensdag 23 maart 2022 06:54:57 CET Axel Beckert wrote: Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Diederik de Haas wrote: I do not have a /run/samba/ directory on my Bookworm system/server. I don't think it's relevant, but it (sti

Bug#1008638: ldns: diff for NMU version 1.7.1-2.1

2022-04-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
ld be addressed later. Closes: #1008638 + + -- Michael Tokarev Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:03:29 +0300 + ldns (1.7.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * Team upload. diff -Nru ldns-1.7.1/debian/patches/series ldns-1.7.1/debian/patches/series --- ldns-1.7.1/debian/patches/series2020-06-03 23:55:03.

Bug#1008638: ldns: diff for NMU version 1.7.1-2.1

2022-04-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
ython (3.10) and allows the python3.10 transition to +happen, but it is not fixing the actual issiue with ldns using +distutils which should be addressed later. Closes: #1008638 + + -- Michael Tokarev Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:03:29 +0300 + ldns (1.7.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * Team u

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
13.04.2022 09:50, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Control: reassign 1009385 libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 Control: retitle 1009385 libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data Control: affects 1009385 + dns-root-data X-Debbugs-Cc: Michael Tokarev Control: tags 1009385

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
13.04.2022 10:09, Michael Tokarev wrote: .. But let's try. How this utility is used in building of dns-root-data?  Lemme take a look at this package.  If you can provide me some minimal testcase to produce just the DS record which differs, it will be nice. I don't have time for

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
[Just a quick follow-up] On 13.04.2022 15:52, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: [...] It seems it was fixed on 1.8.0. https://github.com/NLnetLabs/ldns/commit/4d2057f0b5220487882be1b19c302833b84cffe3 Wonderful.. :) Thank you Santiago! So, the prob should've be there after just any recompile of ldn

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 13.04.2022 16:44, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: .. So what do we do now? I think the best is to include this fix as 1.7.1-3 (provided it actually fixes the issue) for now, instead of uploading 1.8. Why just don't uploading 1.8.1? Well, we know 1.7 (sort of) works while 1.8 might cause surp

Bug#990417: openjdk-11-jre-headless: running java in qemu s390 gives a SIGILL

2021-09-11 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 normal Lowering severity of this bug to normal. It definitely is not grave in my book, - this is a regular emulation bug which can't emulate some specific code. Or else every emulation bug should be marked "grave" as it affects "other software". BTW, I for one can't reprodu

Bug#948722: qemu-block-extra, (build-)dependencies unsatisfiable on mipsel.

2020-01-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 normal Control: tag -1 + moreinfo 12.01.2020 18:37, peter green wrote: > Package: qemu-block-extra > Version: 1:4.2-1 > Severity: serious > > The binary packages built from the ceph source package were recently removed > from mipsel, because the new version of ceph runs out

Bug#910571: qemu-user-static i386 (and x86-64) on armel host errors while loading shared libraries

2018-12-21 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 normal On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:07:39 + Theo wrote: Package: qemu-user-static Dear Maintainer, I'm trying to run Stretch 386 binaries on a PogoPlug E02, which is currently running an Arch Linux system. I populated a directory using debootstrap. Can you please try out

Bug#916279: qemu-system-common: Overwrite /usr/share/doc-base/qemu-system-doc without declaring replacement

2018-12-23 Thread Michael Tokarev
24.12.2018 6:00, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Followup-For: Bug #916279 Control: found -1 1:3.1+dfsg-2 Hi, you are missing a Breaks: qemu-system-data (<< 1:3.1+dfsg-1~) to match the Replaces, otherwise you are permitting partial upgrade/downgrade paths where files are disappearing whil dpkg consi

Bug#913335: qemu-system-i386: Display 'sdl' is not available.

2018-11-09 Thread Michael Tokarev
10.11.2018 00:34, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > reopen 913336 > thanks > > Michael Tokarev dixit: > >>> pn qemu-system-gui >> >> Ditto as for #913336. > > Nope. > > 1. I still get “Display 'sdl' is not available.” if I select it. *if*

Bug#1013259: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
01.11.2022 10:59, Michael Tokarev wrote: .. And this revealed one more issue here, now with samba 4.17.  Where, the same libndr.so again, has changed soname from libndr.so.2 to libndr.so.3! And it looks like *this* is what you're talking about now, once 4.17 with this new libndr.so.3

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with unnecessary soname bump libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + upstream Original context was at http://bugs.debian.org/1013259 , but whole thing *now* has is about completely unnecessary soname bump of libndr in 4.17 due to debugging refinements. 01.11.2022 11:07, Michael Tokarev wrote: 01.11.2022 10:59, Michael Tokarev wrote: .. And

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with unnecessary soname bump libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
01.11.2022 13:14, Ralph Boehme wrote: On 11/1/22 09:15, Michael Tokarev via samba-technical wrote: Control: tag -1 + upstream Original context was at http://bugs.debian.org/1013259 , but whole thing *now* has is about completely unnecessary soname bump of libndr in 4.17 due to debugging

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
Hmm. Other sssd packages are also affected by this. Not only sssd-ad but sssd-ipa and sssd-ad-common. Added the Breaks for these in Bullseye (and also in Ubuntu Jammy, which has exactly the same problem). Will be in the next upload. /mjt

Bug#1023501: busybox-static: version 1:1.35.0-3 breaks boot on hppa

2022-11-06 Thread Michael Tokarev
ng mdadm package did not help. Downgrading busybox-static to 1.35.0-2 fixed the issue. Now this is interesting. In -3, I included these changes: commit ac478f88b64d5884d5e81bcd8f8344f0ec72df6a Author: Michael Tokarev Date: Mon Oct 17 12:52:23 2022 +0300 deb,static:

Bug#1023654: liburing 2.3 breaks binary compatibility

2022-11-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
Source: liburing Version: 2.3-1 Severity: grave liburing 2.3 broke binary compatibility without bumping the soname. In liburing.h in 2.3, structures io_uring_cq and io_uring_sq changed their sizes. Both of these structures are parts of io_uring structure which the main part of the API. Here's th

Bug#1023654: liburing 2.3 breaks binary compatibility

2022-11-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 15:51:17 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: Source: liburing Version: 2.3-1 Severity: grave liburing 2.3 broke binary compatibility without bumping the soname. In liburing.h in 2.3, structures io_uring_cq and io_uring_sq changed their sizes. Both of these structures are parts of

Bug#1023654: liburing 2.3 breaks binary compatibility

2022-11-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
08.11.2022 17:11, Guillem Jover wrote: [..] If you are really seeing samba linked against old liburing not working with the new liburing, then we'd need to dig further to see what else might be missing, but I'm currently not seeing it just by a very quick code staring. Well. I already deleted m

Bug#1023654: liburing 2.3 breaks binary compatibility

2022-11-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
08.11.2022 16:44, Guillem Jover wrote: Hi! On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 16:32:25 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 15:51:17 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: Source: liburing Version: 2.3-1 Severity: grave liburing 2.3 broke binary compatibility without bumping the soname. Indeed

Bug#1023654: liburing 2.3 breaks binary compatibility

2022-11-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
08.11.2022 17:50, Michael Tokarev wrote: 08.11.2022 17:11, Guillem Jover wrote: [..] If you are really seeing samba linked against old liburing not working with the new liburing, then we'd need to dig further to see what else might be missing, but I'm currently not seeing it just

Bug#993014: cifs-utils non-parallel FTBFS

2022-08-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + pending 22.08.2022 17:11, L. van Belle wrote: I can confirm the patch works. I've tested on a Debian Bullseye build with cifs-utils 7.0 from https://ftp.samba.org/pub/linux-cifs/cifs-utils/ I refreshed patch 001. Added the patch shown buy Helmut. And I builded against Debian

Bug#993014: Processed: Re: cifs-utils non-parallel FTBFS

2022-08-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
25.08.2022 11:49, L. van Belle wrote: ... The shown fix, commit aeaa786aceb0ea781ded2c151fb68f6b34880ad4 is the patch I added. and cifs-utils 7.0 also fails to build without that patch with parallel=1 It's difficult to follow. Commit aeaa786aceb0ea781ded2c151fb68f6b34880ad4 is wrong by its own

Bug#993014: cifs-utils non-parallel FTBFS

2022-08-27 Thread Michael Tokarev
27.08.2022 03:35, Santiago Vila пишет: Hi. Now that this is finally fixed in sid, here is a proposed diff for bullseye, including changelog. Heh. The changelog includes entry by me.. it is not fair for your contribution, I think.. :) BTW, should we drop the .1 from -3.1+deb11u2 release numbe

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
13.04.2022 21:19, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Hi Michael and Santiago-- I've now uploaded ldns 1.7.1-3 with the associated fix for 1009385. I'm reviewing Michael's changes for 1.8.1, and they're looking good to me. Thank you for all that work, Michael! I think we should consider uploading 1.8.1

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
13.04.2022 21:29, Michael Tokarev wrote: The only prob is that the master branch on the ldns repository is seriously messed up. Also you've made similar commits as I did, but in an incomplete way (like the watch file update). Thanks, /mjt

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
13.04.2022 21:19, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: .. reviewed and i'll push that to salsa as a "debian/experimental" branch later today, if either of you want to take a look at what i'm considering for release. The whole thing was ready, polished, everything addressed. If you wanted another 1.7.1 up

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
Okay guys. I thought about this a bit more. One wrong action by one developer does not make the environment unhealthy. I fixed the mess done to the master branch. I think - provided this wont happen again - it's okay to work on this to fix the rest of the mess done. I'm doing this right now.

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
Fixed my branch on the ldns repo, rebasing it on top of now-okay master. If we ever need one more 1.7 release it will be easier to rebase now with the conflicts resolved. I have to review my branch again, I think something might not be right there after the rebase on top of dkg's changes. I will

Bug#1009385: libldns3 1.7.1-2.1 changes output of ldns-key2ds, causing FTBFS on dns-root-data [was: Re: Bug#1009385: dns-root-data: FTBFS: root-anchors.ds root.ds differ]

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
BTW, Daniel, please re-tag 1.7.1-3 - this is what's at the tip of master now. I hope anyway :) Thanks, /mjt

Bug#1009385: communication

2022-04-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
[Resending whole thing. I think it is is important to have it publicly available and to reach you, so adding it to the bugreport too. Apparently team+dns@tracker.d.o isn't working and there's no archives] I want to follow up on the todays ldns incident. I think it was quite interesting. The whol

Bug#1009204: vdirsyncer: diff for NMU version 0.18.0-6.1

2022-04-18 Thread Michael Tokarev
nd on +all pythons. Closes: #1009204 + + -- Michael Tokarev Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:39:33 +0300 + vdirsyncer (0.18.0-6) unstable; urgency=medium * avoid checking flaky test test_fuzzing; diff -Nru vdirsyncer-0.18.0/debian/tests/control vdirsyncer-0.18.0/debian/tests/control --- vdirsyncer-0

Bug#927747: bind9_dlz backend is entirely broken in Debian

2022-04-28 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 normal On Wed, 8 May 2019 22:35:53 +0200 "Steinar H. Gunderson" wrote: On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 10:02:46PM +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote: > Downgrading the severity as the AppArmor side is already fixed it seems in sid. serious and grave are of equal severity; serious is fo

Bug#929983: bug 929983: ipxe-qemu: virtio booting no longer works after upgrade to buster

2022-05-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
05.05.2022 13:47, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi all, [CC-ing src:debian-edu and src:qemu as they pull in src:ipxe-qemu into the key package set, so I consider them stakeholders in this RC bug.] On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:29:55 +0100 (CET) Thorsten Glaser wrote: So we now know without fail that there’s

Bug#929983: bug 929983: ipxe-qemu: virtio booting no longer works after upgrade to buster

2022-05-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
06.05.2022 19:49, Mike Gabriel wrote: .. at least the bugtitle is far to unprecise. Here, I test Debian Edu bullseye really heavily and integrate FAI in Debian Edu. The FAI installer and also the diskless machines I very often boot via iPXE/QEMU. In Debian 11 (and probably beyond), PXE booting

Bug#929983: bug 929983: ipxe-qemu: virtio booting no longer works after upgrade to buster

2022-05-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 normal 08.05.2022 02:18, Thorsten Glaser wrote: .. In this bugreport, I see it is/was broken with -machine pc-1.1. There's no indication if it is broken with other machine types.  As of qemu 5.2 (bullseye) machine types below pc-1.3 are deprecated, and in 7.0 (current bookwo

Bug#1024852: nvidia-driver in bullseye (470.141.03-1~deb11u1) and bullseye-backports (470.103.01-1~bpo11+1) do not support Linux kernel 6.0 or later

2022-11-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 12:43:12 -0800 Alex Relis wrote: Package: nvidia-driver Version: 470.103.01-1~bpo11+1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, About a week ago, linux-image-6.0.0-0.deb11.2-amd64 was introduced in bullseye-backports. The problem is that the

Bug#1020776: qemu-system-data in bullseye-backports is too old

2022-09-27 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 26.09.2022 17:39, Justin Ossevoort wrote: Package: qemu-system-data Version: 1:5.2+dfsg-11+deb11u2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@internetionals.nl Dear Maintainer, The latest packages in Debian Bullseye Backports depend on qemu-system-data

Bug#1021371: gnome-control-center doesn't start, saying libsamdb-common.so.0 requires version `LDB_2.2.4'

2022-10-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + confirmed 07.10.2022 11:38, Simon McVittie wrote: ... # smbclient --help smbclient: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libldb.so.2: version `LDB_2.2.4' not found (required by /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/libsamdb-common.so.0) Workaround: also upgrade samba-libs to the version from t

Bug#1021371: gnome-control-center doesn't start, saying libsamdb-common.so.0 requires version `LDB_2.2.4'

2022-10-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
07.10.2022 18:08, Michael Tokarev wrote: ... Removing the symver LDB_2.2.4 from libldb.so.2 was an ABI break, so libldb2 should have versioned Breaks against dependent packages that use the old symver. It looks as though only the samba and maybe sssd source packages will be affected by this. I

Bug#1021371: gnome-control-center doesn't start, saying libsamdb-common.so.0 requires version `LDB_2.2.4'

2022-10-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
07.10.2022 18:53, Simon McVittie wrote: On Fri, 07 Oct 2022 at 18:08:41 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: In debian samba package, there's a strict versioned dependency of libldb2 for samba package - actually samba-dsdb-modules - the only package which actually *uses* libldb. I'm not s

Bug#1019485: libvirglrenderer-dev should depend on libva-dev

2022-10-17 Thread Michael Tokarev
16.10.2022 08:04, Adrian Bunk wrote: ... With 0.10.3-1 vulkan is a new requirement, breaking the qemu build again: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qemu&arch=amd64&ver=1%3A7.1%2Bdfsg-2%2Bb1&stamp=1665894634&raw=0 The complete list is currently: $ pkg-config --cflags virglrenderer P

Bug#1019485: libvirglrenderer-dev should depend on libva-dev

2022-10-17 Thread Michael Tokarev
18.10.2022 00:17, Michael Biebl wrote: .. Patching the upstream provided .pc file in Debian feels odd, tbh. Are you sure Requires.private is only relevant for static linking? Isn't this what Libs.private is for. Yes it feels odd indeed. The problem here is often due to lack of understanding h

Bug#1019485: libvirglrenderer-dev should depend on libva-dev

2022-10-17 Thread Michael Tokarev
18.10.2022 09:41, Michael Tokarev wrote: .. At least once I come across a case where pkgconfig --cflags were actually needed - because this library's header file actually included some other header file. And iirc, it was an upstream bug, the dependency should have been listed as non-pr

Bug#1019485: libvirglrenderer-dev should depend on libva-dev

2022-10-18 Thread Michael Tokarev
According to the FAQ at https://people.freedesktop.org/~dbn/pkg-config-guide.html#faq : My library z uses libx internally, but does not expose libx data types in its public API. What do I put in my z.pc file? Again, add the module to Requires.private if it supports pkg-config. In this ca

Bug#1019485: libvirglrenderer-dev should depend on libva-dev

2022-10-20 Thread Michael Tokarev
Ok. This package appears to lack some love. Bugs are never closed (I just closed a few bugreports which were fixed years ago), migration status apparently is never checked, bugs actually are not watched/handled (these 2 bugs are here for quite some time already). I pinged the maintainer but he did

Bug#997082: qemu: FTBFS: usb.c:200:23: error: array subscript ‘device_descriptor_t[0]’ is partly outside array bounds of ‘u8[8]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[8]’} [-Werror=array-bounds]

2021-10-23 Thread Michael Tokarev
23.10.2021 19:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: qemu Version: 1:6.1+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevan

Bug#901547: seabios: Source tarball ships compiled binaries

2018-06-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo 14.06.2018 19:23, Vivia Nikolaidou wrote: > Package: seabios > Version: 1.11.1-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.1.2 > > Dear Maintainer, > > I just noticed that the source tarball of seabios includes some compiled > binaries: [] > They should not be ship

Bug#871094: proposed NMU

2018-04-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
15.04.2018 05:19, Adam Borowski wrote: > Hi! > This FTBFS has been unresponded for 8 months, has a patch rotting for 6. > Sounds like NMU time. > > Here's a debdiff that includes this and #833444. I'll upload to DELAYED/7, > please yell if anything is wrong. Oh. I haven't noticed this bugreport.

Bug#888182: qemu-system-arm: qemu-system-arm crashes when run as part of the nbdkit testsuite

2018-04-15 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 normal Hmm.. I've no idea why this bug has severity Grave to start with. /mjt

Bug#896478: qemu-user-static: needs Breaks: binfmt-support (<< 2.1.7)

2018-04-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
21.04.2018 16:06, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: qemu-user-static > Version: 1:2.12~rc3+dfsg-2 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > qemu-user-static fails to upgrade with binfmt-support from stretch > installed since that does not know about --fix-binary: Yeah, it requires a more recent binfmt-su

Bug#964185: freetype2.pc depends on libbrotlidec.pc without a dependency on the libbrotli-dev package

2020-07-03 Thread Michael Tokarev
On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 18:45:07 +0900 Mike Hommey wrote: .. > Arguably, freetype2.pc shouldn't depend on libbrotlidec.pc except with a > Required.private, assuming one doesn't actually need to include > libbrotli headers or link against libbrotli library (presumably, that's > the case). The thing i

Bug#950431: qemu-system-ppc: file conflict between qemu-system-{data, ppc}

2020-02-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
01.02.2020 18:53, Adam Borowski wrote: > Package: qemu-system-ppc > Version: 1:4.2-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package uninstallable > > Hi! > Upon upgrading or a fresh install: > > Unpacking qemu-system-ppc (1:4.2-2) ... > dpkg: error processing archive «TMP»/3-qemu-system-ppc_1

Bug#1058029: qemu-guest-agent: QEMU-GA WON'T START

2023-12-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible 11.12.2023 14:51, Y : Package: qemu-guest-agent Version: 1:8.1.2+ds-1~bpo12+1 Severity: serious Justification: 6 Dear Maintainer, The problem arose after upgrading from bullseye to bookworm. What did you upgrade, host or guest system? All was OK on

Bug#1058795: installing docker.io makes all qemu guests lose internet connection

2023-12-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 14:54:32 +0100 Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote: Package: docker.io Version: 20.10.24+dfsg1-1+b3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? installed docker.io with existing qemu guests in bridge mode, did not d

Bug#1060052: cifs-utils: Copy file from same cifs mount to cifs mount --> kernel NULL pointer derefernce

2024-01-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 normal Control: merge 1060005 -1 FWIW, this is kernel bug, not cifs-utils bug, - guess it's 6.1.0-17 regression. /mjt

Bug#1060134: kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod

2024-01-06 Thread Michael Tokarev
06.01.2024 11:40, Helmut Grohne: On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 09:01:12AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: I also recommend to establish QA for all udebs to automatically detect, report and address such conflicts as they evidently cause undefined behaviour otherwise. That can be as simple as collecting fil

Bug#1068063: sssd: FTBFS on armel, armhf (test failures with test_pam_xxx, test_user_xxx... for 2.9.x)

2024-04-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 16:59:51 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI wrote: Source: sssd Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Control: found -1 2.9.4-1.1 X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org Dear Maintainer, sssd fails to build on armel, armhf. Though test suite failure was already reported, but target version is 1.11.5.1

Bug#1068526: samba-dsdb-modules dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386 architectures.

2024-04-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
07.04.2024 05:54, Peter Green wrote: Ubuntu has already fixed this issue by removing the hardcoded dependency on libgpgme11 I fixed it in git too, but forgot to upload. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/720831431/riseup-vpn_0.21.11+ds1-5build3_0.21.11+ds1-5ubuntu1.diff.gz While poking through t

Bug#1068737: locales fails to install: locales failed to preconfigure, with exit status 2

2024-04-09 Thread Michael Tokarev
Package: locales Version: 2.37-16 Severity: grave A fresh `debootstrap unstable' chroot plus `apt install locales`: Preconfiguring packages ... locales failed to preconfigure, with exit status 2 dpkg: error processing package locales (--configure): installed locales package post-installation

Bug#1077810: documentation: dcut cancel does not actually cancel a regular upload

2024-08-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
Package: dput-ng Version: 1.39 Severity: grave The documentation (manpage) for `dcut cancel` states: cancel Cancel an upload entirely. The upload is referred to as a changes file name existing remote in the incoming or deferred queues. This is wrong, because cancel actually can

Bug#1076008: qemu-system-ppc: Missing NIC ?

2024-08-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: severity -1 normal On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 15:34:03 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: 09.07.2024 15:29, Christian Marillat пишет: > On 09 juil. 2024 15:25, Michael Tokarev wrote: > >> 09.07.2024 15:23, Christian Marillat wrote: >>> On 09 juil. 2024 13:18, M

Bug#1077452: picolibc: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:134: override_dh_auto_test] Error 104

2024-08-28 Thread Michael Tokarev
I'm not an arm guru, my knowledge of arm is near non-existent. The commit in qemu which I bisected this to yesterday, apparently, is a bugfix, - previously qemu allowed an unaligned access here, while real hardware does not. Now qemu behavior matches that of the hardware. So it might as well be

Bug#1077452: picolibc: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:134: override_dh_auto_test] Error 104

2024-08-30 Thread Michael Tokarev
Adding -mno-unaligned-access to MESON_ARM_*_FLAGS fixes the tests failure with a more recent qemu. From the comments at https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2542 it looks like the only prob here is that the testsuite (which is designed to run without any OS whatsoever, just as a bootload

Bug#1076974: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#1076974: samba_4.20.2+dfsg-8_riscv64-buildd.changes REJECTED

2024-07-24 Thread Michael Tokarev
24.07.2024 23:06, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Source: samba Version: 4.20.2+dfsg-8 Severity: serious On 2024-07-24 18:50, Debian FTP Masters wrote: Version check failed: Your upload included the binary package ldb-tools, version 2:2.9.1+samba, for riscv64, however testing already has version 2:2.9

  1   2   3   4   5   >