Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-4
Severity: serious
(as already mentioned on IRC).
the new gcj-4.1 apparently changed location of jawt (and other sos):
libgcj7-1-awt: /usr/lib/gcj-4.1-71/libjawt.so
java-gcj-compat-dev does excpects it on another path:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2007-04-26 13:50
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
clone 421301 -1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 needs update for new gcj-4.1
reassign -1 java-gcj-compat-dev
thanks
Rene Engelhard wrote:
java-gcj-compat-dev does excpects it on another path:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2007-04-26 13:50
/usr/lib
Package: myspell-de-de,hunspell-de-de
Version: 20051113-8
Severity: serious
This is a dummy bug to prevent this entering testing without OOo 2.2
as it would break german spellchecking for OOo in testing (as iit won't
be installable in testing together with OOo and bitney doesn't catch that)
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
file does not exist:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Richte java-gcj-compat-dev ein (1.0.65-10) ...
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
file does not exist:
/usr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
file does not exist:
/usr/lib/jvm/java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
close 438870 2.2.1-8
close 438870 2.3.0~oog680m2-1
thanks
Hi,
fixed in above versions (typoed the bugnr in the changelog)
Regards,
Rene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Hi,
Sven Joachim wrote:
The latest upload of openoffice.org-draw to unstable added a
dependency on libwpg-0.1-1 which is of priority extra. This
priority needs to be bumped to optional.
Yep, I noticed to late that (damn, dh_make which defaults to extra now)
that I uploaded with the wrong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
unmerge 439496
reassign 439496 swing-layout
thanks
Hi,
how is unzip not found (so a missing build-dep on unzip) related to
the Java errors in gjdoc?
Regards,
Rene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.76-2
Severity: serious
# apt-get install java-gcj-compat-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if
Matthias Klose wrote:
Rene Engelhard writes:
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.76-2
Severity: serious
looks like a newbie gone wild and filing bug reports without looking
into NEW first.
Irrelevant.
a) I am not a newbie. I just know it's not installable *now* and
therefore
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
no, I don't care anymore about delays in NEW after having to wait
about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to
land in NEW, then they should process them in time. What do you
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Rene Engelhard writes:
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
no, I don't care anymore about delays in NEW after having to wait
about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have
severity 440647 important
retitle 440647 DicOOo.sxw crashes when -base not installed
thanks
Hi,
Barry Klein wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.x
doesn't fit. Version: expects real versions, not some pseudo ones.
Severity: serious
Umm, no.
If openoffice.org-base is not installed,
clone 442338 -1
reassign -1 libcurl4-gnutls-dev
retitle -1 CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT gone, CURLE_OBSOLETE10 not working
severity -1 grave
found -1 7.17.0-1
block 442338 by -1
thanks
Hi,
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
your package failed to build from source.
because curl broke afais.
Hi,
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
curl 7.17.0 breaks the build of openoffice.org. Rene has already found the
cause, it is described below.
Eh, no. curl 7.17.0 does *not* break this as you will see below.
Incorrect. It breaks. As you say yourself.
Is it only a formal error by the curl side or
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Nope. We still support the option as described above.
Not when you define CURL_NO_OLDIES.
You've received (at least) two mails describing the purpose of this define,
and it is even explained in the public libcurl header
Hi,
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I didn't. I just said that you was wrong saying globally that curl 7.17.0
doesn't break builds. In some circumstances it does. You also claimed
without making an exception that you still supported the options above
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.6.1-3
Severity: grave
Hi,
as discussed on IRC:
13:10 _rene_ MadCoder: ping?
13:14 MadCoder _rene_: small pont
13:14 -!- ema (Emanuele Rocca) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel
13:14 MadCoder pong
13:14 -!- tdykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] has quit [Ping
Package: x11proto-render-dev
Version: 2:0.9.2-4
Severity: grave
My OOo build (which just worked fine perfectly on an up-to-date i386 before
I did the dist-upgrade which upgraded x11proto-render-dev on my amd64 machine)
now fails. I don't think OOo is at fault, though.
OOos configure fails with
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 08:42:11AM +0100, Thomas Hackert wrote:
there is another message:
Richte openoffice.org-wiki-publisher ein (1.0+OOo3.1.1-5) ...
Copying: wiki-publisher.oxt
Enabling: Wiki Publisher
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:28:23AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
WTF?
[copy] Copying 7 files to
/build/user-writer2latex_1.0-8-amd64-7Pr9C6/writer2latex-1.0/target/classes
make: ***
reassign 571397 ant
retitle (reproducible) Bus error while building writer2latex
found 571397 1.8.0-2
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:15:53PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
[copy] Copying 7 files to
/build/user-writer2latex_1.0-8-amd64-7Pr9C6/writer2latex-1.0/target/classes
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 04:54:16PM +0100, Wojciech Zabolotny CERN wrote:
I have found the http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566189
(maybe my bug is just duplicate of this one?)
Yes.
I have removed the whole /var/spool/openoffice directory, and it helped.
qed.
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 07:32:14PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Besides that, wtf do you use 3.2.0-2 on testing? I mean, it is
not in testing. There very well might be some increased dep on KDE missing
(of course sid packages were built with sids KDE) - but that would be KDE bug
reassign 572107 openoffice.org-kde
found 572107 1:3.2.0-2
tag 572107 + moreinfo
tag 572107 + unreproducible
thanks
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:52:35PM -0300, pedro bulach gapski wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.2.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Nonsense.
[ please send sane mails. No HTML please ]
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:36:16PM -0300, Pedro Bulach Gapski wrote:
I can not tell them apart.
No?
should be fixed. My guess, however, is at a kde integration issue.
If you guess that, how is it hard to see openoffice.org-kde?
Anyway,
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 06:28:57PM -0300, Pedro Bulach Gapski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote:
[ please send sane mails. No HTML please ]
sure. My mistake. Sorry.
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:36:16PM -0300, Pedro Bulach Gapski wrote:
I
reopen 571397
thanks
Hi,
the changelog of 1.8.0-3 suggests moving -gcj fixes this. Unfortunately it
doesn't; it fails with the same error.
$ dpkg -l ant*
Gewünscht=Unbekannt/Installieren/R=Entfernen/P=Vollständig Löschen/Halten
| Status=Nicht/Installiert/Config/U=Entpackt/Fehlgeschl.
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 06:02:14PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
Rene Engelhard schrieb:
the changelog of 1.8.0-3 suggests moving -gcj fixes this. Unfortunately it
doesn't; it fails with the same error.
...
ii ant1.8.0-2Java based build tool like make
...
ii ant
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 08:09:49PM +0100, Gábor Gombás wrote:
Just a mee too in response to if anyone can still find it again:
# aptitude safe-upgrade
And dist-upgrade (or full-upgrade I think is what aptitude calls it)?
Who said that safe-upgrade will work in all dependency cases?
reopen 571771
severity 571771 important
retitle 571771 Couldn't configure pre-depend ... probably a dependency cycle
(when using aptitude)
tag 571771 + help
tag 571771 - unreproducible
tag 571771 - moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 11:00:45PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sun, Mar
tag 573787 + squeeze
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:25:37PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
openclipart-openoffice.org: Conflicts: openoffice.org-common ( 1:3.2) but
1:3.1.1-16 is to be installed
E: Broken packages
I'm setting
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
1259.08 ari iulian: the problem is in hunspell
1336.54 iulian ari: Alright... how did you find out?
1344.18 ari iulian: [2]google.com/codesearch.. maybe you should ask him
to get a backtrace
OK, ari probably means
[ please ALWAYS CC the bug so that stuff is recorded in the BTS ]
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:21PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
1259.08 ari iulian: the problem is in hunspell
I
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:21PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
1259.08 ari iulian: the problem is in hunspell
I doubt
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:52:35PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
I have now installed hunspell-hu (and removed automatically myspell-hu).
I run 'gdb pidgin' command and wait until my HDD stop and Pidgins window
never come visible. At that moment I hit Ctrl-C and get BackTrace:
So you have
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:46:36PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:52:35PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
I have now installed hunspell-hu (and removed automatically myspell-hu).
I run 'gdb pidgin' command and wait until my HDD
,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:02:14AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:21PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote:
Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote
severity 585979 wishlist
tag 585979 + pending
thanks
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:34:37PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-thesaurus-fr
Version: 3.2.0~rc2-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
And why on earth is this a grave bug? Correct, it is not.
How
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Anton Ertl wrote:
Anyway, you can find the log (created with xterm -l) of the whole
session on
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/tmp/Xterm.log.smaug.2010.01.10.13.23.18.28970
| Preparing to replace openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1 (using
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:37:13PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
The preinst tries to show a error debconf message when it detects a OOo
running.
For some reason (I just saw it in a chroot), it does not show the debconf
message in
clean chroots but just fails.
Which turned out
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:38:48PM +0100, Ferry Toth wrote:
After upgrading today from openoffice.org (1:3.1.1-8) to 1:3.1.1-14,
Openoffice crashes immediately on startup.
Starting from the command line lets me pick the document type, then crashes
as well with:
terminate called
forwarded 566189 Thorsten Behrens t...@openoffice.org
retitle 566189 openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes on startup with
DeploymentException
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:09:25AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:38:48PM +0100, Ferry Toth wrote:
After upgrading
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:53:10AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I'll now try to debootstrap an old squeeze wizth 1:3.1.1-8, install
OOo with some extensions and upgrade...
Interestingly I can't reproduce this in a 1:3.1.1-8-1:3.1.1-14 upgrade
(installed: openoffice.org openoffice.org-sdbc
[ disclaimer: I am not the maintainer of enchant ]
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:18:57PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
While trying to build a package that uses enchant but does not
directly use glib I noticed that libenchant-dev is only depending on
libenchant1c2a and not on for example
: #559991)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:46:59 +0100
+
libreadline-java (0.8.0.1-8.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
with LANG=C to work around build failure (closes: #549047)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:00:04 +0100
+
magyarispell (0.99.4-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/spellhtml.debhelper.log magyarispell-0.99.4/debian
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:11:38PM +0100, Ferry Toth wrote:
I get:
find /var/lib/openoffice /var/spool/openoffice -name *.rdb
/var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/services.rdb
Hi,
I don't think Hidekis patches are not really solving the problem.
It fixes the subdir-in-usr-bin problem but it creates new one
by moving quite gerenic names like cserver/tserver etc. to /usr/bin.
What about using /usr/lib/kWnn4/bin or so? (That is allowed by
the FHS). Though I don't know
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:08:37PM +0100, Ferry Toth wrote:
Moving the folder
/var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend/
out of the way let's Openoffice start without crashing.
Yes (as guessed).
And I try it
severity 566606 important
tag 566606 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:44:53PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.1.1-14
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 3.4.1
Wrong. This is should, not must.
How is this serious? :)
The l10n
retitle 566644 Pre-Depends: on openoffice.org-common makes lenny-squeeze
upgrades fail
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:25:30PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
as discussed on IRC and RL: upgrading
openoffice.org-hyphenation-it, -hu, -zu, -sl, -af and -de (at least) from
lenny to squeeze
tag 566829 + moreinfo
tag 566829 + unreproducible
thanls
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:47:26AM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
$ soffice
Who says soffice is the launcher to use?
(But OK, shouldn't matter)
Error while mapping shared library sections:
WTF is this?
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:27:30PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Do you have some security features enabled somewhere?
What happens if you disabled them?
What I also would try is ro check your .rdb files, maybe
this is an other symptom of #566189/#566062/#565667...
Oh, and please try
forwarded 566829 Thorsten Behrens t...@openoffice.org
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:47:26AM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
$ soffice
Error while mapping shared library sections:
pand:$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/cairocanvas.uno.so: No such file or directory.
upstream means that
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:21:07PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:47:26AM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
$ soffice
Error while mapping shared library sections:
pand:$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/cairocanvas.uno.so: No such file or directory.
upstream means
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:50:51PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Please also check /var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/services.rdb (eventually
^ program/
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http
forwarded 566832 Thorsten Behrens t...@openoffice.org
thanks
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Ferry Toth wrote:
The forwarding adres is incorrect I think: [1]...@openoffixe.org
oops, thanks
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' :
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:21:30PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
fixed 566829 1:3.2.0~rc3-1
thanks
[...]
3.2 in experimental works.
Actually that might only be by chance...
(as the upgrade of course adds a new services.rdb, and this time a not-broken
regcomp created a not-broken rdb...)
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:35:28PM +0100, MP wrote:
I think I encountered same problem, after installing new version in sid
(amd64), splash screen briefly blinks and then I got Segmentation fault
I have Openoffice.org version 1:3.1.1-14
However, reinstalling both openoffice.org and
clone 558240 -1
severity -1 important
reassign -1 libmysqlcppconn4,libmysqlcppconn-stlport4
found -1 1.1.0~r786-2
retitle -1 missing visibility markup makes OOo unable to catch exception -
crash
block 558240 by -1
tag -1 + pending
tag 558240 + pending
thanks
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:27:49PM
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:19:17PM +1100, Tim Richardson wrote:
Sorry, just to be clear: I did already have the package libmysqlclient16
installed. The error goes away only after installing package
libmysqlclient-dev (5.1.41-3)
Ah, I see. Upstream strikes again by looking for .so
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:14:05PM +1100, Tim Richardson wrote:
The file is in the package
libmysqlclient-dev (5.1.41-3)
which I did not have installed and was not a dependency (I suppose it
shouldn't be, being a -dev).
Yeah, as said in the other mail upstrema has the habit of relying
severity 584322 important
tag 584322 + unreproducible
tag 584322 + moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 03:23:40AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-writer
Version: 1:3.2.0-10
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
That means 3.2.0-9 from testing works?. (That's what those infos say)
Package: libgcj-bc
Version: 4.4.4-1
Severity: serious
I was just testing OpenOffice.org 1:3.2.1-1 (built on uptodate sid):
r...@frodo:~/Debian/Pakete/openoffice.org$ sudo dpkg -i
openoffice.org-gcj_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb
Selecting previously deselected package openoffice.org-gcj.
(Reading database
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:38:41PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
So the .shlibs adds a dependency on a non-existing version and thus
makes built -gcj packages uninstallable.
Thankfully any upload of gcc-defaults would most probably automagically
fix this, but I'd still prefer it saying
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:02:25PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
I have reassigned this bug to hunspell based on the discussion I have just
had with Ari Pollak on IRC.
Aha. And what was this discussion about? Can you please mention it here
and why you and/or Ari think it's a hunspell
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:23:55PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:02:25PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
I have reassigned this bug to hunspell based on the discussion I have
just
had with Ari Pollak on IRC.
Aha. And what was this discussion about? Can
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
1245.24 iulian ari: OK. It seems that's not a bug in
pidgin-facebookchat. See the
comments in the bug report. Any idea to which package I should reassign
it?
1259.08 ari iulian: the problem is in hunspel
Package: hunspell-de-med
Version: 20091008-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
$ dpkg -L hunspell-de-med
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/myspell
/usr/share/myspell/dicts
/usr/share/hunspell
/usr/share/hunspell/dicts
/usr/share/hunspell/dicts/de_med.dic
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:33:34AM +0100, Vítězslav Kotrla wrote:
I can see the same behaviour on my Sid/Experimental mix: when I run oowriter
or oocalc, splash screen shows briefly (just a flicker) and then ... nothing.
Output on console:
[...]
After I did
#apt-get install
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 09:22:19PM +0100, Marek Poks wrote:
i think this is not same as my issue. i have reinstalled entirelly oo with
removing previous settings/caches/rdb, i have ceated fresh user for
testing purposes. problem still occurs.
With -14? Try -15. If it then still
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 11:00:54PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
And please try to properly upgrade all packages, I see you have a ure
on 3.1.1-8 level. (ure is the exact package which was buggy). How did
you upgrade openoffice.org? Surely not with a normal dist-upgrade (that
would have
severity 566832 grave
close 566832 1:3.1.1-15
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:53:52PM +0530, Vikram Vincent wrote:
ii ure1.5.1+OOo3.1.1-8 OpenOffice.org UNO runtime
environ
WTF do people (you are the second one) have this installed still?
Don't people use proper
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:06:45AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Already fixed in sid. Obviously you didn't even dare to check the bugs in
the BTS for this.
Oh, I take this back; you even did reply to one of the closed bugs
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 02:39:51PM +0530, Vikram Vincent wrote:
On 9 February 2010 13:36, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:53:52PM +0530, Vikram Vincent wrote:
ii ure 1.5.1+OOo3.1.1-8 OpenOffice.org UNO runtime
environ
WTF do
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:16:41PM +0100, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
I have an (experimental) squeeze installation, which has been crippled
by something suspiciously looking like this bug for a couple of weeks.
The announced fix (packages update to 1.3.1.1-15) does not (yet ?) seem
to
severity 569840 serious
tag 569840 + moreinfo
tag 569840 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.1.1-15
Severity: critical
How does it break the whole system? Correct, it doesn't.
Read bugs severities
severity 569903 + important
tag 569903 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:36:13PM +0100, Jessica Wrobel wrote:
Justification: Renders package unusable for copypaste
I am sorry, but no. a) it probably is only cut'n'paste from web
b) assuming that copy/paste works for the rest
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
aziz:~# LANG=C aptitude upgrade
Works here. Clean squeeze chroot + OOo + aptitude - sid
Here I have it reproduced in multiple machines. These are sid machines
updated very often, but not particular configuration.
# maybe even 3.1.0, but of course the info is not enough...
found 570254 1:3.1.1-8
reassign 570254 openoffice.org-kde
# maybe even earlier, but this is tested
close 570254 1:3.2.0-1
thanks
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:49:30PM -0200, pedro bulach gapski wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-calc
Version:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 04:50:58PM -0200, Pedro Bulach Gapski wrote:
This bug is not new for me, although I have not reported it earlier. This
behavior has been present at least in the last 3 squeeze versions.
Aha. OK. WTF did you then not mark that as such instead of marking it as
a
severity 570361 serious
thanks
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:43:19PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I'll not fix it as this bug is nonsense anyway, so I'll
just close it
It actually turned out that it isn't...
And that one is unfixable. Unless you want to revert the RC bugfixes
from 3.1.1-15
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:24:36PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
$ apt-cache show libmodern-perl
Package: libmodern-perl
(snip)
Homepage: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Modern-Perl/
and
$ apt-cache show libmodern-perl-perl
Package: libmodern-perl-perl
(snip)
Homepage:
reassign 578251 openoffice.org-core
retitle 578251 depends on non-existant yet (OOo 3.2.1) ure version
close 578251
thanks
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 02:50:39AM -0700, Jonathan A. wrote:
Package: ure
Version: 1.6.0
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
Wrong.
I
Package: gcj-4.4-jdk
Version: 4.4.4-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
Seen this on the s390 build of openoffice.org 1:3.2.0-9
(https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=openoffice.orgarch=s390ver=1%3A3.2.0-9stamp=1272919681file=logas=raw):
[...]
AOT_MAKEFLAGS=-j1 aot-compile -L
Hi,
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 11:07:10PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Seen this on the s390 build of openoffice.org 1:3.2.0-9
(https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=openoffice.orgarch=s390ver=1%3A3.2.0-9stamp=1272919681file=logas=raw):
[...]
AOT_MAKEFLAGS=-j1 aot-compile -L /usr/lib
Hi,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 580148 + moreinfo
thanks
Which info do you need? I can try on my armel sid when the currently
running testbuild for an other thing is over.
according to
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:53:18PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 580148 + moreinfo
thanks
Which info do you need? I can try on my armel sid when the currently
running testbuild for an other thing is over
severity 580148 serious
thanks
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:45:25PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:53:18PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 580148 + moreinfo
thanks
Which info do you need
retitle 580148 gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory
thanks
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 12:53:16PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
I do not have access to those boxes, but IMHO gcj does not find
libgcj.spec because gcj from gcj-4.4-jdk_4.4.4-1 looks for
Package: icedtea-gcjwebplugin
Severity: grave
Hi,
after installing icedtea-gcjwebplugin about:plugins in iceweasel didn't
show the Java plugin.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins$ ls -l
insgesamt 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 24. Mai 17:46 gtk-vnc-plugin.so -
Hi,
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
But seriously, what's the ETA for Sun Java to enter main? Fedora is
already shipping it, right?
That doesn't say anything, we all know that other distributions are
sloppy with license issues.
But that said, openjdk entered Debian now (yay!).
But *if* you move
Hi,
Bastian Venthur wrote:
* Send the output of /usr/share/bug/PACKAGE/script if available
(Closes: #417256, #422085, #434212)
#417256 is about presubj. did you also finally fix reportbug-ng to show
that one? You didn't say that in the changelog.
#422085 main point is presubj, too.
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Bastian Venthur wrote:
* Send the output of /usr/share/bug/PACKAGE/script if available
(Closes: #417256, #422085, #434212)
#417256 is about presubj. did you also finally fix reportbug-ng to show
that one? You didn't say that in the changelog.
#422085
retitle 491623 python-dev builddep still has unneeded [$(OOO_ARCHS])
severity 491623 minor
found 491623 1:2.4.1-6
tag 491623 + pending
tag 491623 - experimental
thanks
Hi,
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.0.0~beta2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
No.
tag 561498 + unreproducible
tag 561498 + moreinfo
# fix version. if at all applicable, we'll see..
notfound 561498 3.1.1-8
found 561498 1:3.1.1-8
thanks
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 06:55:23PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
While doing a dist-upgrade from lenny to squeeze, I got the
following error:
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98~20091221-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
sorry, german dpkg output, but you probably get it anyway:
Richte grub-pc ein (1.98~20091221-1) ...
Installation finished. No error reported.
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found background image: moreblue-orbit-grub.png
Found linux image:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:49:25AM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
/etc/grub.d/30_os-prober: 40: function: not found
Anyway, just remove the function keyword from line 40 in 30_os-prober.
I already fixed that upstream.
Actually not, you also need to add ().
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`.
301 - 400 of 1296 matches
Mail list logo
