Package: reportbug
Version: 3.2
Followup-For: Bug #295853
Chris, good to hear. From the Changelog I got the impression that this
issue still had not been addressed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this it should be possible to somehow
reconstruct what packages were installed at the time I tried the upgrade
and thus analyze what triggered this failure.
Best regards
Rolf Leggewie
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386
Package: mc
Version: 1:4.6.0-4.6.1-pre3-1
Severity: serious
File: /usr/bin/mcedit-debian
Justification: unknown;/etc should not be overwritten
Stefano,
thank you for your work on the mc package.
Today I found out that somehow the latest upgrade of the mc package
must have overwritten the
Package: turck-mmcache
Followup-For: Bug #330559
Hi,
the package is phpapi-20050606 (IIIRC) which is provided for example by
libapache2-mod-php4.
Regards
Rolf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
reassign 564433 python
forcemerge 520858 564433
thank you
Carl,
thank you for reporting this problem which is bug 520858 and not a
problem in gbirthday itself. You will find information in bug 520858 on
how to fix the issue for you.
Regards
Rolf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: esmtp
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
The configuration file for esmtp is installed world-readable. This is a
security
hole since it may contain user/password combinations for remote mail servers.
This
is even likely to be generally
Package: twinkle
Version: 1:1.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 7.7
Hi,
twinkle from unstable fails to build from scratch (tested in Jaunty, but I'm
sure
it applies to Debian as well) due to a missing build-depends on libarts1-dev
which
provides the mcopidl binary.
Package: twinkle
Followup-For: Bug #527770
Here is the patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+twinkle (1:1.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * add libarts1-dev to build-dependencies
+
+ -- Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz Sat, 09 May 2009 05:30:13 +0900
+
twinkle (1:1.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
Mattia Monga wrote:
Package: gourmet
Version: 0.14.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The program crashes before showing the main window. Attached you can find the
error trace.
Mattia,
thank you for your report. Sorry to hear you are experiencing trouble.
FWIW,
Mattia,
thank you for the quick response.
I apologize if my terminology was misleading. I was not suggesting that
this is a problem with environment settings.
Can you please include the information I requested in my earlier mail in
your next reply? Thank you.
Regards
Rolf
--
To
Package: gourmet
Followup-For: Bug #507382
Mattia and Jonathan,
thank you for the information provided.
My main system is Ubuntu hardy and I never experienced this problem
there. I am not sure what system Thomas (upstream) is using, but he was
unable to reproduced it as well. I had a few
severity 507382 important
thanks
Alexander,
thank you for your comment.
As the maintainer for the package, I think I explained why the package
was downgraded from grave to important. Namely, neither Thomas who is
upstream nor I were able to reproduce the problem. The program runs
just
Enrico,
thank you for your report and my apologies for the troubles it has
caused you.
Enrico Zini wrote:
sqlalchemy.exceptions.ProgrammingError: (ProgrammingError) You must not use
8-bit bytestrings unless you use a text_factory that can interpret 8-bit
bytestrings (like text_factory =
Hi,
please try patching /usr/share/gourmet/gourmet/GourmetRecipeManager.py
with the attached patch and see if that works.
Regards
Rolf
--- GourmetRecipeManager.py 2009-03-29 17:14:02.847300473 +0900
+++ GourmetRecipeManager.py.orig 2009-03-29 17:13:22.751305287 +0900
@@ -983,7 +983,7 @@
Package: pastebinit
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
pastebin.com is the default pastebin used. Pastes can no longer be made
because pastebin.com changed its syntax.
ACK'ing as maintainer of pastebinit package
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
thank you for reporting this issue. Is the FTBFS particular to an AMD64
build host? I'm sorry, I don't have access to one and as the maintainer
of scim, I cannot reproduce the problem on my 32bit build host. Your
help is appreciated.
Regards
Rolf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 08.08.2010 04:45, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval
Ahmed,
thank you for the quick reply and the pointer to the wiki.
After reading the wiki and the thread in the mailing list it's my
understanding that there's currently nothing I can do. I cannot
block 591628 by 590410 590385 590392
thank you
RC bugs for scim-canna, scim-skk and scim-prime have already been filed.
Blocking on them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 08.08.2010 06:17, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
I think you can empty the dependency_libs field in .la file, as
mentioned in the wiki. That too fixes the FTBFS (just tried it now)
Since I cannot verify this problem, would you please be so kind to
confirm that http://oss.leggewie.org/scim_1.4.9-4.dsc
On 09.08.2010 11:44, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
Yup, building mlterm against libscim-dev libscim8c2a resulting from this
source package fixed it indeed. Thanks.
great!
Thank you for confirming. Uploading now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
severity 592579 important
thank you
this is certainly an important bug to look at, but not release-critical.
http://release.debian.org/squeeze/rc_policy.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: gbirthday
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: http://wiki.debian.org/SqueezeReleaseGoals
It's my understanding that switching to DebSrc3.0 is one of the release goals
for Squeeze. Gbirthday should be updated to that format.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: bugz
Version: 0.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: http://wiki.debian.org/SqueezeReleaseGoals
It's my understanding that switching to DebSrc3.0 is one of the release goals
for Squeeze. Gbirthday should be updated to that format.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: gjots2
Version: 2.3.9-2
Severity: serious
Justification: http://wiki.debian.org/SqueezeReleaseGoals
It's my understanding that switching to DebSrc3.0 is one of the release goals
for Squeeze. Gbirthday should be updated to that format.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: pastebinit
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: http://wiki.debian.org/SqueezeReleaseGoals
It's my understanding that switching to DebSrc3.0 is one of the release goals
for Squeeze. Gbirthday should be updated to that format.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: wondershaper
Version: 1.1a-5
Severity: serious
Justification: http://wiki.debian.org/SqueezeReleaseGoals
It's my understanding that switching to DebSrc3.0 is one of the release goals
for Squeeze. Wondershaper should be updated to that format.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: scim-bridge
Version: 0.4.16-2
Severity: serious
Justification: http://wiki.debian.org/SqueezeReleaseGoals
It's my understanding that switching to DebSrc3.0 is one of the release goals
for Squeeze. scim-bridge should be updated to that format.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
severity 601768 normal
thanks
Sven,
thank you for the bug report.
I've only just taken over isdnutils with this release. There's still
many things that need to be worked out in isdnutils and I'm sure
there'll be more breakage before that's done. Please bear with me.
I'll turn off abort on
tags 618228 help
Thank you
Hi,
thank you for reporting this issue. FWIW, I cannot reproduce the
build failure on my i386 host and I don't see any 64-bit specific
code in the build system. Jan-Michael, I think you have a 64bit
machine, can you have
On 25.11.2010 12:09, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for isdnutils (versioned as 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1)
and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Hallo Alexander,
vielen Dank für Dein Interesse an isdnutils. Ich war
For people reading the BTS, my last message was intended as a private
message to Alexander. It's in German, so feel free to skip over it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 25.11.2010 12:09, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for isdnutils (versioned as 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-6.1)
and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/isdnutils/isdnutils_3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7.dsc
is what I would like to see uploaded
Thanks guys, for your input. There are many minefields with isdnutils.
I appreciate you pointing them out. FWIW, my Ubuntu system does not
have /dev/MAKEDEV and I want to make sure that eventually Ubuntu can
drop it's delta. As such, I will need a bit more time to look into this
issue.
--
On 26.11.2010 14:21, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
In case more time means more than a few days, could we have a fixed
version in sid please? Besides, maybe you might want to test -x instead of -e
when looking for MAKEDEV?
Guys, I appreciate you taking isdnutils seriously. I'm happy to see the
package
On 27.11.2010 14:37, Julien Cristau wrote:
Err. 597926 *is* RC.
No.
Depending on how you look at it, it's either resolved or what's left to
do is not RC. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
re bug 597926; I believe the calls to MAKEDEV are obsolete.
http://old.nabble.com/MAKEDEV%2C-postinst-and-udev-td28831653.html#nabble.pending28836543
The next release will come without those calls. I believe that will
address your concerns. Please keep your input coming, it's much
appreciated.
On 06.12.2010 06:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
That's not appropriate during a freeze. Please get the RC bugs fixed in
testing, with no additional changes...
Please explain what is inappropriate about that. I believe the proposed
fix is the proper fix and not an additional change. Please
On 06.12.2010 06:58, Julien Cristau wrote:
It's not the minimal change to fix the install failure.
I think that's open for debate. Plus, unless you upload directly to
testing you're going to get a few unrelated changes anyhow.
I held back changes I felt were more likely to introduce
Christian,
thank you for your report. There is already a package on mentors
that is waiting for sponsorship and that should address your issue.
I'm still a bit surprised by your report. Would you please be so
kind to tell me if you udev, makedev or both
On 06.09.2011 19:49, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
I guess this is due to Gnome 3 transition.
Aoki-san, I'm surprised by the speed by which you want to abandon this
widely-used package. In fact, the FTBFS does not seem to be introduced
by the Gnome 3 transition (which will
On 31.07.2011 05:01, Julien Cristau wrote:
The installed tcl version is 8.5.
Also please don't send html mail...
Julien,
thank you for coming back to this ticket. I've had a fixed package up
on mentors.debian.net for well over a month now. Seems as if the
package did not survive the recent
On 31.07.2011 05:01, Julien Cristau wrote:
The installed tcl version is 8.5.
Also please don't send html mail...
Julien,
thank you for coming back to this ticket. I've actually had a fixed
package up on mentors.debian.net for well over a month now. Seems as if
the package did not survive
severity: wishlist
thank you
I'll choose to assign a VERY low priority in my todo-list for people who
grossly overstate the severity of their pet bug. I think in your case
google is your friend. I certainly ain't (any longer). scim certainly
has many problems, but it also works well for many
Paul,
thank you for your report. I have a bit of trouble duplicating the
issue (although I found another one while trying). To me it sounds a
bit like you are running into a file propagation issue for the mirror
network unrelated to the packaging. Are you sure that the latest
version of
On 14.01.2012 06:09, Paul Menzel wrote:
`sudo aptitude safe-upgrade` fails to upgrade `libcapi20-dev` with the
following error message.
I believe you actually ran into the error I was referring to earlier as
found another one while trying. It manifests itself the way you
reported here (those
Thank you for your comment, Cyril. I'm not convinced but willing to
listen. I hope you are, too.
On 22.01.2012 18:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Erm. Breaking the dpkg configuration phase means you can break alot of
other packages. On mine that was “just” glib*, gtk*, so the whole X
session was
with
iceweasel need further investigation. Overall, this is no longer an
RC-blocker, adjusting severity.
Best regards
Rolf Leggewie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
severity 609736 important
tags 609736 - patch
thanks
As I've written in this ticket before, this is not a bug in isdnutils.
I'm afraid there is no good solution at the moment and I'm not aware of
anyone working on this in the kernel or udev. For the time being the
administrator needs to make
Christoph, thank you for the report and patch. I've only become aware
of it now. I've had a look and intend to fix the issue in both
experimental and unstable with only a slight difference to what you
suggest. I'm busy with family commitments and travel preparation for
the next few days but
Hello Lucas and Theppitak,
thank you for this report and the work you've already done to fix it.
I'm currently preparing a new scim upload, I was on the road a few days.
Regards
Rolf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 15.06.2012 17:11, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
I'm uploading it anyway. It should still fail on s390, due to the broken
build-dependency.
The s390x buildd maintainers informed me that this is a transient error
with the build hosts. It's not an issue in scim.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Thanks for the pointer. I can confirm the FTBFS and will look into it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 676009 patch
thanks
Tz-Huan has uploaded a patch for this issue to the git packaging repo on
collab-maint but apparently he hasn't had the time to announce it here,
yet. Thanks, Tz-Huan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: scim
Version: 1.4.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTFBS
The latest upload of scim is affected by FTFBS. This is another multi-arch
related
issue, the build fails in dh_install. It seems that for some reason i386 arch
does
not properly build some of the packages with multi-arch
Hi,
thank you for your problem reports. I believe it's fairly obvious that
the two of you are experiencing different issues. Toni started
experiencing problems with 1.4.13-5 while that's apparently working fine
for Jidanni.
On 03.07.2012 06:43, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Versions of packages
reassign 678890 scim-prime
thanks
the packages building against scim and gtk need to be updated. The bug
is not in scim itself. reassigning.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: isdnutils
Version: 1:3.25-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
I am filing this as maintainer against my own package since
it's RC-severity and I will need a freeze exception to fix it.
In the past few months I had been working with upstream to drop
dfsg-nonfree bits from
On 09.07.2012 01:14, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Thank you for your report, but please try to avoid duplicate reports.
This has been reported already about a week ago. In fact, the fix is
already in experimental,
tags 680813 + pending
thanks
Thank you for this report. The underlying issue is a version mismatch
with libcapi20-dev. I've prepared a new package to be uploaded to
unstable and have asked my previous sponsor to help me upload.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
substantial change made to
that file, so it will need more looking into.
66f57040def47857f48544a0e2ed3627d5c8a4e9
Regards good night
Rolf Leggewie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
severity 673311 normal
thank you
Salvo,
thank you for your report.
On 18.05.2012 03:17, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Package: pastebinit
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package is usable just fine and should be completely unaffected in
its default
severity 673311 normal
thanks
On 18.05.2012 21:29, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Could you look into it?
I'd be more inclined to do that if you weren't engaging in a severity
fight and questioning my judgment as maintainer. Plus, seeing that at
least some of your problems are without a doubt PEBKAC
On 20.09.2012 14:52, Hideki Yamane wrote:
The reason is scim-anthy was unblocked (Bug#685036) and migrated to
testing but scim (1.4.14-2) still stops in unstable. So, release
managers, can you consider to unblock scim to fix RC as well?
Yamane-San,
thank you for your report. Hello from
Hello Hans,
thank you for adding more information to Debian ticket 682601. I'm
sorry to hear you are having problems. Please accept my apologies for
the delay in responding I only happened across your comment today by
chance. I have a hunch as to what might be causing your problem and I
shall
On 17.09.2012 22:10, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
It seems that ffgtk does not start anymore, but I don't really know
why. It just fails with:
shm_open(/CAPI20_shared_memory.v0110, ...) failed - Bad address
Julian Andres,
thank you for this report. I'm sorry to hear about your problems.
On 17.09.2012 22:10, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
It seems that ffgtk does not start anymore, but I don't really know
why.
Please try http://paste.debian.net/191229/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 08.05.2012 03:28, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I didn't look at the postinst script, but error 30 is often the return
value of db_input (from debconf) if a question won't be presented to the user.
Andreas,
thank you for the report. I turned on abort on error in 1:3.22+dfsg1-4
while these errors
On 18.11.2013 22:05, Jan Braun wrote:
Package: polipo
Version: 1.0.4.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package (mostly) unusable
Polipo crashes after few minutes of browsing on my amd64 boxen with
syslog logging enabled. Since syslog logging is now the default, I think
Hello Hans,
thank you for your follow-up.
On 05.02.2014 04:57, Hans wrote:
Dear maintainers,
it looks like polipo has still the same error described in this bugreport.
Actually, no.
LANG=C dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/polipo_1.0.4.1-6_amd64.deb
[...]
Configuration file
On 30.04.2014 06:06, Tobias Frost wrote:
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for isdnutils (versioned as 1:3.25+dfsg1-3.4). The diff
is attached to this message.
Thank you for your work.
I agree with most of the changes you propose. Here are the ones where I
differ.
---
Thank you for the quick reply.
On 30.04.2014 19:02, Tobias Frost wrote:
--- isdnutils-3.25+dfsg1/debian/control 2013-06-06 12:36:15.0
+0200
[...]
- automake, autoconf, libssl-dev, psutils,
+ automake, autoconf, libssl-dev, psutils, libcapi20-dev (=1:3.27),
I don't think there
On 17.01.2014 11:47, Adam Borowski wrote:
Package: polipo
Version: 1.0.4.1-5
Severity: grave
When attempting to upgrade or uninstall+install:
Setting up polipo (1.0.4.1-5) ...
Starting polipo: Couldn't open log file /var/log/polipo: Is a directory
invoke-rc.d: initscript polipo, action
Hello Andreas,
the successor to ffgtk is called Roger Router. Upstream is the same but
treats the two projects as completely separate so there is no upgrade
path as such. Configuration is fairly simple, though, so I don't see
much of a problem here. And apparently configuration stored on the
On 04.03.2014 17:17, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
the successor to ffgtk is called Roger Router.
Well, I forgot to mention the most important bit; the packaging for
Roger Router has been finalized and I'm not waiting for sponsorship so
that the new package can land in NEW.
https://mentors.debian.net
Roger Router has been finalized and I'm not waiting for sponsorship so
s/not/now/
On 04.03.2014 18:08, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
fwiw, I'm personally not interested in sponsoring anything that
doesn't give users a (best effort?) upgrade path.
I wasn't aware you're actually in a position to
Dear Michel,
thank you for providing twinkle as a FOSS software. My name is Rolf
Leggewie, I've been a long-time user and for many years it has been the
only software that was actually working with my setup while others
consistently failed.
I contact you with regards to https://bugs.debian.org
Control: tags 750521 + help
Control: found 750521 1.4.14-6
On 27.11.2014 02:04, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2014-11-26 12:49:47 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I think i'm able to reproduce the problem (no keyboard input accepted in
pinentry-gtk-2) from a minimal gnome setup with just:
note to self: bug 712823 and bug 750521 sound surprisingly related
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 02.12.2014 15:35, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
This is a quick heads-up to let everyone know that I am looking into
this as well as to kindly request help from others. I shall write more
as I progress with this ticket.
OK, while I was not able to download a live CD for Jessie to test in a
clean
On 03.12.2014 00:25, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
export GTK_IM_MODULE=;echo GETPIN | pinentry-curses FAILS
suggesting there is something essentially wrong with pinentry as well
I got confused about what Ximin had written about pinentry-curses since
later on he mentioned only pinentry-gtk2, but here
On 03.12.2014 00:25, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
export GTK_IM_MODULE=;echo GETPIN | pinentry-curses FAILS
suggesting there is something essentially wrong with pinentry as well
I got confused about what Ximin had written about pinentry-curses since
later on he mentioned only pinentry-gtk2, but here
On 03.12.2014 00:49, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 12/02/2014 11:40 AM, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
Contrary to my statement above, pinentry-curses seems to be generally
working as expected.
yep, i think this report is specifically about something broken in the
interaction between pinentry-gtk2
Control: reassign -1 pinentry-gtk2
On 03.12.2014 01:14, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
yep, i think this report is specifically about something broken in the
interaction between pinentry-gtk2 and scim.
Yep, and it turns out to be a VERY old problem indeed (still reading up
on it). It's from at least
On 17.02.2015 01:49, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
This could be fixed by fixing #760341 so that pastebinit defaults to
paste.debian.net The root cause of that is lsb-release doesn't support
Python 3, breaking the distro detection.
The attached patch works around that by using platform to
Peter,
thank you for your message. It seems you forgot to include the Debian
BTS, please don't message me privately, let's keep it in the bug
tracker. I will fullquote your message for reference.
On 12.03.2015 00:16, Peter Schütt wrote:
Hallo,
I never use aptitude so did the following:
Hello guys,
thank you for working on this bug. I'm happy some work has been done in
experimental already.
What I do not understand is why this bug is marked as RC. As far I am
aware removal of python-support is not an RC-goal. I think this ticket
should be downgraded.
Mattia, do you have your
On 29.12.2015 03:53, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:13:52AM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>> severity 786165 important
> this bug IS RC: python-support was just removed from the archive
Mattia,
merry Christmas! Your w
Mattia, thanks again for your work.
On 13.05.2016 11:22, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> I think that depending on
> "libpeas-1.0-python2loader | libpeas-1.0-0 (<< 1.16.0-1ubuntu1),
> libpeas-1.0-0 (>= 1.18.0-2) | libpeas-1.0-python3loader" would be needed
> to support all of trusty, xenial and unstable
Jan-Michael,
there's been some talk in http://bugs.debian.org/620391 about Roger
Router and PEAS Python2 plugins.
As upstream, are you actually aware of any Plugins for Roger that are
Python 2? I'd rather see them ported to Python 3 or become deprecated
than add a complicated web of additional
On 13.05.2016 08:51, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Hello Barry,
>
> so, libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader has officially made it into Debian. I'm
> now thinking how to deal with that for roger.
>
> On 03.04.2016 05:35, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Apr 02, 2016, at 10:33 PM, Rolf Legge
On 13.05.2016 12:26, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> there's been some talk in http://bugs.debian.org/620391 about Roger
> Router and PEAS Python2 plugins.
Make that http://bugs.debian.org/817936
Hello Barry,
so, libpeas-1.0-0-python2loader has officially made it into Debian. I'm
now thinking how to deal with that for roger.
On 03.04.2016 05:35, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 02, 2016, at 10:33 PM, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
>
> Hi Rolf,
>
>> I'm still at a loss what it is yo
100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+freelan (2.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Sebastien Vincent ]
+ * patches: backport 5014a8023b from upstream. Closes: #853406
+fix FTBFS with gcc7
+
+ [ Rolf Leggewie ]
+ * control: update to standards version 4.0.0
severity 865460 important
thanks
On 08.09.2017 00:40, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> roger is unusablel with this bug. So I set the severity to grave.
Hello Jörg,
thank you for the report. FWIW, roger runs fine for me, albeit on an
Ubuntu system. In your original report you write "since some
On 11.01.2018 21:49, Jérôme wrote:
> QBirthday now has a setup.py which makes it easier to install. I hope
> it also makes it easier to create a .deb from the sources.
>
> Rolf (or anyone), would you like to package QBirthday?
Jerome, thank you. That sounds pretty good. I shall look into it.
97 matches
Mail list logo
