Package: ipsec-tools
Version: 1:0.5-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Unpacking replacement ipsec-tools ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/ipsec-tools_1%3a0.5-2_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/etc/ipsec.conf', which is also in package openswan
Um 23:56 Uhr am 11.04.05 schrieb Sven Hartge:
[Sorry for spamming this bug report, but I _really_ need to get this going
*fast*.]
My last change is
set_lk_max_lockers 10
which was still default and seems to be to _real_ culprit, as per
ITS#2030:
http://www.openldap.org
, at least my experience show this.
But: I still consider it a grave bug for db4.2, if running out of lockers
corrupts the database. And I consider it a bug in slapd, if it runs into a
busy-waiting loop, if something inside the database went wrong.
Grüße,
Sven.
--
Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix
Um 00:36 Uhr am 27.11.06 schrieb Josip Rodin:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
Can you perhaps provide a configuration (and by that I mean the
RRD::graph invocation) and a .rrd data file that makes librrd2
explode?
If you want, I can privately provide a tar
it to something
else, like shown above.
If you still use the split XML tree, the entry is inside
~/.gconf/desktop/gnome/peripherals/mouse/%gconf.xml
This change reverts your cursor style to the plain old X11 one, but stops
the constant errors. At least for me, so far.
Grüße,
Sven.
--
Sven Hartge
Um 02:23 Uhr am 12.04.06 schrieb Sven Hartge:
Open your ~/.gconf/%gconf-tree.xml and locate the following entry:
entry name=cursor_theme mtime=1144799098 type=string
stringvalueX/stringvalue
/entry
Most users will have Industrial in there. Just change it to something
else
to the gconf-tree:
Gnome falls back to the default builtin cursor theme, which works without
problems.
So to me this indeed looks like a bug somewhere inside X.
Grüße,
S°
--
Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek
Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://www.svenhartge.de/
Achtung, neue Mail-Adresse
Package: couriergraph
Version: 0.24-2
Severity: grave
The recent upload to unstable declares a versioned dependency on
librrds-perl (= 1.1) which cannot be satisfied in Sid (or Etch=.
The changelog for this version lists
* Incompatibility with rrdtool1.2 has to wait until next version
but
Um 05:48 Uhr am 18.05.06 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
The versioned depends was on purpose.
Why? To break the package?
The version in question should have _never_ been uploaded to unstable.
Why did you intentionally upload a *broken* version to unstable?
What purpose does such a
Package: avahi-daemon
Version: 0.6.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
avahi-daemon links to libavahi-core.so.4 from libavahi-core3, but does
not depend on it, thus causing the daemon to fail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/sbin/avahi-daemon
linux-gate.so.1 =
realized my error.
Sorry for the noise and trouble.
S°
--
Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek
Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://www.svenhartge.de/
Package: rxvt-unicode
Version: 7.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package is build with gcc4.2 from experimental and thus depends on
libgcc1 from experimental which causes it to be uninstallable in Sid:
rxvt-unicode: Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.2-20060707) but
Package: procps
Version: 1:3.2.7-1
Severity: serious
/etc/init.d/procps is using which (located at /usr/bin/which) at a
time where /usr is not mounted.
This causes the init-script to fail and leaves /etc/sysctl.conf
unprocessed.
The severity is justified by the fact that /etc/sysctl.conf is the
a backported
package to Sarge (where which is only in /usr/bin).
I am very sorry for the noise I made, I will take my business with this
problem back to the backports.org mailinglist.
Grüße,
Sven.
--
Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek
Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://www.svenhartge.de/
Achtung, neue
Package: librrds-perl
Version: 1.2.15-0.1
Severity: critical
Since the upgrade from 1.2.11-0.6 to 1.2.15-0.1 munin-graph consumes
all memory and swap on my system, causing the system to be unusable
until the OOM killer fires and hopefully kills the offending processes.
Since munin-graph is run
Package: python-imaging
Version: 1.1.5-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
During setup of python-imaging the following happens:
Setting up python-imaging (1.1.5-8) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1314, in ?
main()
File
Package: python2.4-minimal
Version: 2.4.3-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
During configuration the following happens:
Setting up python2.4-minimal (2.4.3-7) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1365, in ?
main()
File
Package: imapproxy
Version: 1.2.6-3
Severity: critical
The postinst overwrote my working /etc/imapproxy.conf with an empty file
and thus causes the daemon to fail to start and consequentially all
applications using the proxy.
ds9:/etc # ls -al imapproxy.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4121 Jun 24
Here is a -x version of the postinst.
Setting up imapproxy (1.2.6-3) ...
+ '[' -e /usr/share/debconf/confmodule ']'
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' '' ']'
++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
++ '[' '' ']'
++ exec /usr/share/debconf/frontend
Um 10:59 Uhr am 24.06.08 schrieb José Luis Tallón:
Which PERL version are you using?
(i.e. what does perl -version say)
This is perl, v5.10.0 built for i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi
perl:
Installed: 5.10.0-11
Candidate: 5.10.0-11
Version table:
Grüße,
Sven.
--
Sven Hartge
processing:
imapproxy
And again imapproxy.conf is empty:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# ls -al imapproxy.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 24. Jun 11:41 imapproxy.conf
During installation I get only asked on debconf question about the ip to
listen on (with localhost being the default).
Grüße,
Sven
--
Sven
José Luis Tallón wrote:
I have produced a fixed version. Please test it so that we can
double-check before having this uploaded.
Looks fine to me.
Grüße,
Sven.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
node creation.
else
# Call makedev and fix perms
cd /dev; MAKEDEV fuse
chgrp fuse /dev/fuse
fi
As far as I know, /dev/.udev is guaranteed to be present while udev is
active. No need to grep /proc/mounts or anything else.
Grüße,
Sven.
--
Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix
Package: azureus
Version: 3.0.3.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Azureus is uninstallable in Sid:
azureus: Depends: libswt-gtk-3.3-java which is a virtual package.
This also causes an additional FTBFS bug.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT
Christian Perrier wrote:
At first glance, it seems that replacing all db_input foo/bar by
db_input foo/bar || true (in isdnutils-base.config, for instance)
could be what makes things work *without* set +e. Untested, though
Some other packages have been bitten by this recently (but I can't
Package: localepurge
Version: 0.6.1
Severity: grave
Hi.
Since the installation of bash-4.1 on my system, localepurge does not work any
more:
,
| :/root # bash --version
| GNU bash, version 4.1.0(1)-release (i486-pc-linux-gnu)
| Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
Pablo López Martín wrote:
Its a bug in /lib/lsb/init-functions
start_daemon function in /lib/lsb/init-functions has a bug in 3.2-21.
I changed:
args=--start --chdir '$PWD' --nicelevel $nice --quiet --oknodo
to:
args=--start --chdir $PWD --nicelevel $nice --quiet --oknodo
and it works.
Package: bacula-director-sqlite3
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Hello.
During the update from a previous sqlite2-base director, the postinst runs the
following command:
sqlite $DB .dump | sqlite3 $DB.sqlite3
This will fail on older installations of bacula-director-sqlite, because the
Addendum:
After further experimentation I discovered the following facts.
Given a schema like this, 'x' _will_ autoincrement on insert:
CREATE TABLE t1 (
x INTEGER,
name TEXT DEFAULT ,
PRIMARY KEY(x)
);
Give a schema like this, with added UNSIGNED after INTEGER, 'x' *will
not*
John Goerzen wrote:
Thanks for the report. I am initially unsure what to do about it
either, and have opened an upstream report at the above URL.
http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1351
Quote from Kern Sibbald:
| Converting from SQLite2 to SQLite3 is easy. You simply export or
| dump the
John Goerzen wrote:
I am curious, then, where the AUTOINCREMENT came from, and which
specific older Bacula version you think it may have been in?
I really don't know. But I never manually altered the database.
But, look here:
o...@hild:~/apt/bacula-2.4.4/updatedb$ grep AUTOINCREMENT *
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Based on the information you provided below, I have reopened the bug report
and posted my suggested fix. Sorry that I missed the fact that the Bacula
developers added the offending AUTOINCREMENT. I would appreciate a
confirmation to the bug report whether or not my
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 24 August 2009 02:17:29 Sven Hartge wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Based on the information you provided below, I have reopened the bug
report and posted my suggested fix. Sorry that I missed the fact that
the Bacula developers added the offending AUTOINCREMENT. I
Sven Hartge wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Based on the information you provided below, I have reopened the bug report
and posted my suggested fix. Sorry that I missed the fact that the Bacula
developers added the offending AUTOINCREMENT. I would appreciate a
confirmation to the bug report
Steve Kostecke said:
Jakub Wilk said:
haveged failed to build from source on sparc[0]:
haveged only supports x86 and amd64.
This is not completely true. The code should still support SPARC (and
ia64 and ppc), but the Debian SPARC port has a 32bit (aka sparclite)
userland (with a 64bit kernel)
On 17.10.2010 00:20, intrigeri wrote:
Sven Hartge wrote (13 Sep 2010 23:21:35 GMT) :
Steve Kostecke said:
Jakub Wilk said:
haveged failed to build from source on sparc[0]:
haveged only supports x86 and amd64.
This is not completely true. The code should still support SPARC (and
ia64
Package: isdnutils-base
Version: 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-5
Severity: grave
Hi.
During upgrade and configure, the following happens:
Setting up isdnutils-base (1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-5) ...
dpkg: error processing isdnutils-base (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned
Michael Schmitt tcwardr...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a brief conversation about that issue with a develeoper of compiz
on IRC (#compiz@freenode):
14:54:12 maniac103 you can cite: 'A simple recompile of the
compiz(-gnome) package should be sufficient to get things in order again'
He could
Package: obnam
Version: 0.29-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi Lars,
during a rebuild of obnam I stumbled upon the following error:
FAIL: xattr-change-only: stderr diff:
--- /dev/null 2012-05-27
Package: obnam
Version: 0.26-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi Lars,
during a rebuild of obnam I discovered the following error:
on a filesystem without nanosecond resolution the convert5to6 test
fails:
Package: wine-bin
Version: 1.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to upgrade
Hi Wine Maintainers,
during upgrade to 1.4-3 on Sid the following happens:
Setting up wine-bin (1.4-3) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative link
/usr/share/man/de.UTF-8/man1/wine.1.gz is already managed
Package: libwine-bin
Version: 1.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: does not upgrade
Hi Wine Maintainers,
during the upgrade from 1.4-3 to 1.4-4 the following happens:
Preparing to replace libwine-bin:i386 1.4-3 (using
.../libwine-bin_1.4-4_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libwine-bin:i386
Package: libselinux1
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi!
The recent upgrade auf libselinux1 to version 2.2-1 in unstable causes
smartctl and smartd to fail with the following message:
system:~# smartctl
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-version.c:
On 05.09.2014 16:00, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 22:14:06 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
I guess, the approach needs to be:
(a) provide proper shared libs packages for each libfreerdp-* and
libwinpr-* shared lib
(b) make remmina et al. use generic .so files
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:00:12 + Mike Gabriel sunwea...@debian.org
wrote:
Source: freerdp
Source-Version: 1.1.0~git20140921.1.440916e+dfsg1-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
freerdp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
Umm, how
On 24.09.2014 10:20, Mike Gabriel wrote:
In a private post you mentioned that current remmina-master is
completely broken and the remmina-gtk3 branch still uses the old
freerdp-1.0 cmake rules (this seems easy to fix, actually).
Yes, see here:
The reporter of bug #745794[1] suggested that it's enough to add the
proper build-dependency on libkrb5-dev. Is this correct, or are there
other problems that make finding a fix difficult?
(FYI: I am no DD, just a normal user.)
I tried to rebuild chromium in a pristine Sid chroot with
James McCoy write:
The latest experimental upload didn't include protobuf-compiler in
Build-Depends, so the buildd build failed[0].
[0]:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=chromium-browserarch=i386ver=35.0.1916.99-1stamp=1400365223
Also missing:
gperf
bison
ninja-build
And
Hi!
I just tested this by adding
gcc (= 4:4.9.0-2exp2),
g++ (= 4:4.9.0-2exp2),
to the build-deps and rebuilding inside cowbuilder. With gcc-4.9
chromium is finally able to be linked:
LINK(target) out/Release/chrome: Finished
touch out/Release/obj.target/chrome/chrome.stamp
make[1]:
Package: freeradius
Version: 2.2.5+dfsg-0.1
Severity: grave
Hi!
After the recent upgrade of openssl, freeradius does not start anymore.
freeradius -X results in the following message:
libssl version mismatch. Built with: 1000109f Linked: 100010af
After recompiling the package everything is
Package: dovecot-sieve
Version: 1:2.2.13-9
Severity: grave
Hi!
The postinst of the dovecot-sieve package searches for 90-sieve-extprograms.conf
in the wrong place:
Setting up dovecot-sieve (1:2.2.13-9) ...
Error: The new file /usr/share/dovecot/90-sieve-extprograms.conf does not exist!
dpkg:
Package: needrestart
Version: 2.3-1
Severity: grave
Hi!
Subject says it all: needrestart needs libfile-slurp-perl but does not depend
on it, resulting in an error:
Can't locate File/Slurp.pm in @INC (you may need to install the File::Slurp
module) (@INC contains: /etc/perl
On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:56:50 +0100 Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> python-letsencrypt : Depends: python-acme (= 0.0.0.dev20151114) but
> 0.0.0.dev20151114-1 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, yo
On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:56:50 +0100 Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote:
> In trying to fix #805185 you added a dependency on
This is of course bug #805186
Grüße,
Sven.
Package: python-letsencrypt
Version: 0.0.0.dev20151114-3
Severity: serious
Hi!
In trying to fix #805185 you added a dependency on
python-acme (= ${source:Upstream-Version})
to the python-letsencrypt package, but this prohibits the installation
of that package:
The following packages have
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:10:33 +0100 Pierre Ynard wrote:
> Thank you for your efforts to fix most of the issues with the
> initscript.
There is one other issue with the init-script:
The config option points to the same config file:
On 16.03.2016 09:33, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 23:35 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> Okay! I'd agree on the last statement. :-)
>> I'll fix it soon.
>>
>> For others who get hit, Sven has mentioned the workaround in this bug
>> report.
>
> Can you test the attached .deb
Package: golang-golang-x-tools
Version: 1:0.0~git20160315.0.f42ec61-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1
Hi!
The subject says it all:
The following packages will be upgraded:
golang-golang-x-tools
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:28:49 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> If you upgrade from -5 to -7, you shouldn't be hitting this problem. I
> thought about handling the breakage, but that would touch files outside
> , which I'm not keen on.Â
>
> And Unstable is supposed to have
On 15.03.2016 18:16, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I am not walking away. The failure is 2 folds. If you got hit by -6, on
> your machine the (broken) maintainer script gets installed, which you'll
> have to manually remove.
No, I do not. It is your job as package maintainer to clean this up. You
On 24.07.2016 16:44, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'sid' to 'experimental'.
> It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
> because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
>
On 10.11.2016 16:41, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 10.11.2016, 09:25 +0100 schrieb Sven Hartge:
>> Was the system in question at some time in the past cloned/copied via
>> rsync (without using --numeric-ids) or any other method while having
>> been bootet from
On 10.11.2016 18:51, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> I guess that the error is the wrong group.
Of course, this is obvious.
> But the error comes not from use rsync without --numeric-ids.
> I don't use rsync, I have moved the hard disk with dd.
>
> But also I have no idea from where the dirmngr
On 10.11.2016 08:05, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> # ls -l /etc/bacula/
> insgesamt 104
> -rw-r- 1 root dirmngr 9343 Feb 20 2016 bacula-dir.conf
> -rw-r- 1 root bacula 9156 Aug 18 14:12 bacula-dir.conf.dist
> -rw-r- 1 root dirmngr 1024 Sep 29 2013 bacula-fd.conf
This looks
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:40:05 +0100 (CET) <34tg...@tutanota.com> wrote:
> I use Debian 8 64bit with GNOME installed with standard install
> procedure from netinstall and using tasksel. This occured to me the
> second time. First time was a year ago, I reinstalled Debian then and
> a year after
On 07.01.2017 21:24, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 09:15:15PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:40:05 +0100 (CET) <34tg...@tutanota.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I use Debian 8 64bit with GNOME installed with standard install
>>&
Package: borgbackup
Version: 1.0.11-3
Severity: grave
Hi!
I am reporting this bug against borgbackup, because I am not sure if the
bug is in python3.5 or borgbackup just needs to be binNMUd. Please
reassign as you see fit.
The upload of python3.5 (3.5.4-3) disables the fpectl extension and
Um 03:02 Uhr am 03.02.18 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 02.02.2018 um 20:07 schrieb Sven Hartge:
>> ulogd2 drops its priviliges on its own. It needs to start as root to
>> connect to the netlink sockets.
> So, ulogd2 creates a directory /run/ulog which is owned by ulog:ulog
Hello!
Just for your information:
This is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889144 and
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8085
Grüße,
Sven.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04.02.2018 17:25, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 03.02.2018 um 14:35 schrieb Sven Hartge:
>> Um 14:00 Uhr am 03.02.18 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>> The alternative afaics would be, that the daemon writes the pid file as
>>> munin:munin then (or ulog:ulog for the above case)
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 15:41:37 + Simon Kelley
wrote:
> With my dnsmasq maintainer hat on, the current arrangement looks like this.
>
> 1) /run/dnsmasq is a directory owned by dnsmasq:nogroup
> 2) /run/dnsmasq/dnsmasq.pid gets written by dnsmasq before it drops
> root,
Um 14:00 Uhr am 03.02.18 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 03.02.2018 um 13:27 schrieb Sven Hartge:
>> Um 03:02 Uhr am 03.02.18 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>> Does munin-node have the same mismatch?
>> It has:
>> But, as you can see, the directory is also used by the
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:37:41 +0100 Martin Zobel-Helas
wrote:
> I get segfaults when running update-grub on my Lenovo Thinkpad x270
> running Debian unstable from today.
I see the same on my Dell Precision 7520.
> Using host libthread_db library
On 23.03.2018 11:03, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I don't know what broke it, but seems not a borgbackup issue?
This was
https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/issues/3515
"DistributionNotFound error with msgpack-python 0.5.0 installed"
and also
Package: atop
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: grave
Hello!
After the update tpo 2.4.0-1 atop does not start anymore for me.
TL;DR:
existing file /var/log/atop/atop_20190120 has incompatible header
(created by version 2.3 - current version 2.4)
Here the whole debugging session:
server:~# systemctl
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:10:18 +0200 Vincent Lefevre
wrote:
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> Setting up initramfs-tools (0.133) ...
> update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
> Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.133) ...
> update-initramfs:
Um 01:35 Uhr am 16.04.19 schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
> On 2019-04-15 23:07:02 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Could you add "set -x" to the top of
>> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/plymouth to get a clear picture where
>> exactly the hook fails?
> It is also fc-ca
On 16.04.19 14:32, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2019-04-16 01:53:03 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Try running the following commands as root:
>>
>> mkdir -p /var/tmp/mkinitramfs_0BRFs9/etc/fonts/conf.d
>> cp -a /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /var/tmp/mkinitramfs_0BRFs9/etc/fonts
On 16.04.19 15:12, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> access("/var/tmp/mkinitramfs_0BRFs9//etc/fonts/conf.d/60-latin.conf", R_OK) = > 0
> stat("/var/tmp/mkinitramfs_0BRFs9//var/tmp/mkinitramfs_0BRFs9//etc/fonts/conf.d/60-latin.conf",
> 0x7ffc35e33b50) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>
Package: bind9
Version: 1:9.16.1-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated packages
Hi!
The recent upgrade from 1:9.11.16+dfsg-2 to 1:9.16.1-1 causes
isc-dhcp-server to die upon start with SIGABRT, creating the following
backtrace:
8<
On 22.03.20 19:07, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Interestingly, isc-dhcp-server 4.4.1 does not even compile against the
> current 9.16 libs from Sid right now. Something is very broken here.
I have to correct that part. It seems my checkout from Salsa was wrong,
as recompiling the source package
Package: iptables-netflow-dkms
Version: 2.5.1-1
Severity: grave
Hi!
It seems adfc6318 was not enough to be compatible with Linux 5.9, as
compilation breaks for me with the following log:
---8<--
DKMS make.log for ipt-netflow-2.5.1 for kernel 5.9.0-1-amd64 (x86_64)
Sun 18
Package: xtables-addons-dkms
Version: 3.9-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Hello!
As the subject says: The current version 3.9 does not build with Linux
5.9, but a new upstream release is available.
I created a MR in Salsa correcting this:
On 18.10.20 22:50, Axel Beckert wrote:
That's strange. Works fine for me. Tested on sid amd64 as well:
I tested this on a different system with 5.9 and got the same result and
identical make.log.
But, and here it becomes strange: It does work on a third system of mine.
Question now is:
Package: fp-compiler-3.2.0
Version: 3.2.0+dfsg-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
During postinst the following happens:
Setting up fp-compiler-3.2.0:amd64 (3.2.0+dfsg-9) ...
Saved old "fpc-3.2.0.cfg" to "fpc-3.2.0.bak"
Package: pyzor
Version: 1:1.0.0-5
Severity: grave
Hi!
The fix for https://bugs.debian.org/923077 seems to have introduced a
serious regressing, causing pyzor to stop working on check:
~$ pyzor check < testmail
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pyzor", line 411, in
main()
Package: xtables-addons-dkms
Version: 3.11-1
Severity: grave
Hi!
Kernel 5.9.9 changes ip_route_me_harder() with commit
46d6c5ae953cc0be38efd0e469284df7c4328cf8 causing a build failure for
xtables-addons-dkms:
,
| In file included from
Package: memlockd
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: grave
Hello!
The subject says it all: The package is missing the binary:
,
| oweh@ds9:~$ dpkg -L memlockd
| /.
| /etc
| /etc/default
| /etc/init.d
| /etc/init.d/memlockd
| /etc/memlockd.d
| /lib
| /lib/systemd
| /lib/systemd/system
|
Um 21:04 Uhr am 23.10.21 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > touch src/qt-console/tray-monitor/.libs/bacula-tray-monitor
> > chmod 755 src/qt-console/tray-monitor/.libs/bacula-tray-monitor
> > dh_auto_configure -- --enable-smartalloc --with-tcp-wrappers --with-openssl
> >
Package: liblwp-protocol-http-socketunix-perl
Version: 0.02-4
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Hi!
The module has been broken for a long long time, it tries to
unconditionally use LWP::Debug::trace which has been remove from LWP.
The attached reproducer shows the problem.
There is a forked and
Hello,
I misinterpreted the error.
LWP::Debug::trace() still exists, but one needs to explicitly add
use LWP::Debug;
to the code to be able to use it.
Either way, the code is still very old, broken in the default state,
LWP::Debug only exists for legacy code and should not be used anymore
91 matches
Mail list logo