Package: fvwm95
Version: 2.0.43ba-23
Severity: grave
From /usr/share/doc/fvwm95/changelog.Debian.gz:
fvwm95 (2.0.43ba-23) unstable; urgency=low
* [...]
* Rebuild against libreadline5 (closes: Bug#326361)
It seems that you did not actually do this, since on i386 fvwm95 still
depends on
Package: emacs-goodies-el
Version: 26.3-1
Severity: serious
It seems to me that some Emacs Lisp packages in emacs-goodies-el are
only of any use if non-free software is installed on the system,
namely: maplev.el needs Maple, matlab.el needs Matlab and tcl.el needs
the Target Language Compiler
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: serious
The Debian changelog is missing in the /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc
directory. Please add it there as mandated by section 12.7 of the
Policy Manual.
-- System Information excluded
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
.
While I would still prefer a different package for these files, I am
sufficiently convinced that it is no policy violation to leave them in
the main section. So I've downgraded the severity to wishlist.
Kind Regards,
--
Sven Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Do you have nvidia-glx installed? That package diverts some files in
the xlibmesa-gl package, which leads to the dangling symlink
/usr/lib/libGL.so. Here's what dpkg -L xlibmesa-gl prints for me:
/.
/usr
/usr/X11R6
/usr/X11R6/lib
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2
diverted by nvidia-glx to:
severity 332753 important
thanks
Andre Heynatz wrote:
I have read bug report #208198 and am somewhat confused. It has become a
combinatorical problem, and my head smokes. But there seems to be an easy way
out: libGL.so.1 is linked to different files whether Mesa or nVidia libs are
used:
reopen 208198
tags 208198 - fixed-in-experimental
thanks
As of version 1.0.7676-1 of nvidia-glx, the symlink
/usr/lib/libGL.so - libGL.so.1.2 in the xlibmesa-gl-dev
package is dangling again after installing nvidia-glx.
See http://bugs.debian.org/332753 .
Will this mess ever be cleaned up?
, look in /tmp, grub-install should
have left a log there.
Best regards,
--
Sven Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it is not correct to use emacs21 | emacsen in the
Build-Depends-Indep field, since, AFIK, the xemacs packages provide
emacsen but not the /usr/bin/emacs alternative. It would be better to
use emacs21 | emacs22 | emacs-snapshot instead (the latter works, I
just verified it).
The package
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Rob Browning wrote:
I should have a new version uploaded later this week, probably
by tomorrow night.
Ping?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: w3-doc-e21
Version: 4.0pre.2001.10.27-18
Severity: serious
From /usr/share/info/emacs-21/w3.info.gz:
,
|Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this
| manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are
| preserved on all copies.
`
Package: wine
Version: 0.9.10-1
Severity: serious
It is nice that your packages now recommend several other ones, rather than
just suggesting them. However, there is one package which wine must _not_
recommend, namely msttcorefonts. This package is in contrib, and
recommending it violates
Package: scilab-bin
Version: 3.0-14.1
Severity: serious
Your package depends on libreadline5, indicating that some binary
depends on it (AFICS, it's /usr/lib/scilab/scilex). Since the
readline library is distributed under the GPL rather than the LGPL,
you may not link software with a
Package: emacs-snapshot
Version: 1:20060524-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
There was a problem building this week's snapshot. From the end of the
`debuild' log (sorry for the German, but the problem should be clear
anyway):
# save binary from deletion
mv src/emacs src/nox-emacs
touch
reopen 351516
severity 351516 minor
retitle 351516 fvwm95: Recommends unavailable xcontrib package
thanks
Steve Langasek wrote:
While you're at it, you also should remove the Recommends: of xcontrib
in debian/control, since that package is gone for several years now.
Hmm, please reopen
Package: gcc-4.0-base
Version: 4.0.2-10
Severity: serious
It looks as if bug #346171 has raised its ugly head again, since somehow the
files /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0-base{copyright, changelog.Debian.gz} disappeared
after the upgrade from 4.0.2-9 to 4.0.2-10:
$ ls /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0-base
Ada
Matthias Klose wrote:
Sven Joachim writes:
Package: gcc-4.0-base
Version: 4.0.2-10
Severity: serious
It looks as if bug #346171 has raised its ugly head again, since somehow the
files /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0-base{copyright, changelog.Debian.gz} disappeared
after the upgrade from 4.0.2-9
reassign 355439 libgcc1
thanks
Reassigning this to libgcc1, since I found out this package
(and lib64gcc1) at fault (see my previous message).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Klose wrote:
reassign 355439 gcc-4.0-base
thanks
Sven Joachim writes:
reassign 355439 libgcc1
thanks
Reassigning this to libgcc1, since I found out this package
(and lib64gcc1) at fault (see my previous message).
no, the file is missing in gcc-4.0-base.
Huh? The gcc-4.0-base
Package: loadlin
Version: 1.6c.really1.6c-1
Severity: serious
The DOS executable loadlin.exe is not rebuilt in the maintainer
scripts, and it appears it even cannot be built with programs in
Debian since the makefile in the src directory starts as follows:
# Makefile for LOADLIN-1.6 (C)
Matthias Klose wrote:
But maybe some magic in the preinst scripts can avoid that.
Please check the packages at
deb http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc-4.0 ./
Inside a chroot, I upgraded the packages:
4.0.2-6 - 4.0.2-9 - 4.0.2-11,
but, alas, the copyright and changelog were still lost
Matthias Klose wrote:
please recheck (after downgrading to 4.0.2-9), I had two copies of the
packages at different places. Sorry.
I now looked into the new 4.0.3-1 versions, they hopefully fix
this for good. Some people may wonder why the files in
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0-base have two names,
[ CC'ing debian-emacsen, as this should be of interest for Emacs users and
developers. Also, I would like to read other people's opinion about this.]
Jérôme Marant wrote:
Since the FDL documents contain invariant sections, they will have to be
moved to non-free very soon.
When you do this,
Package: gawk
Version: 1:3.1.5-2
Severity: serious
From the gawk info manual:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the
Package: tar
Version: 1.15.1-4
Severity: serious
From the tar info manual:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software
Foundation;
Package: bash-doc
Version: 3.1-3
Severity: serious
From bashref.info:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software
Foundation; with
Package: backup-manager
Version: 0.5.7-1
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
Tags: patch
The optional CD-burning feature of backup-manager uses a hardcoded filename
(/tmp/bm-cdrecord.log) for logging the output of cdrecord. If a
malicious (or
just unlucky) user makes
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.42
Severity: serious
The source package still contains the non-free files fsf-funding.7,
gfdl.7 and gpl.7, apparently for no good reason since they aren't
installed. Please remove them.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
Matthias Klose wrote:
The source package still contains the non-free files fsf-funding.7,
ok.
gfdl.7 and gpl.7, apparently for no good reason since they aren't
installed. Please remove them.
no, license texts can be included. there's no reason to remove them.
But the GFDL is not the
A new version of mozilla-firefox-locale-all is in incoming, but it
will become useless in just a few days, when the freshly-announced
firefox 1.5.0.7 enters the Debian archives. :-(
Can't this be fixed by upgrading maxVersion in
/usr/lib/firefox/extensions/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/install.rdf
to
severity 388264 wishlist
thanks
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Since the current locales do not work with the thunderbird version in
unstable, I'm raising the severity to grave.
Huh?! What makes you think they don't work? The German locale package
works perfectly fine for me. Note that its
Package: gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg
Version: 4.1.1-nf1
Severity: serious
In previous versions of gcc-4.1-doc (up to 4.1.1-10),
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-doc was a symlink to gcc-4.1-base. Because
dpkg follows the symlink when upgrading the package, your files end up
in /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base,
Package: html-helper-mode
Version: 3.0.4kilo-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Something went wrong when you applied my patch for #374587, since
there is a closing parenthesis missing in line 17 of
/etc/emacs/site-start.d/50html-helper-mode.el. The result is an error
message during Emacs' start
This bug, which was cloned from #365900, should have been closed
together with that bug, seems this was forgotten. Would somebody
close it now? I don't dare doing that myself, considering such an
action as politically not quite correct. ;-)
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
#include hello.h
Is there any progress on this bug? If not, I'll reassign
it to ftp.debian.org and request removal of your package,
to avoid legal risks for Debian.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: thunderbird-locale-de
Version: 1:1.5.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Quoting from section 12.5 of the Policy Manual:
Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright
and distribution license in the file
`/usr/share/doc/package/copyright'.
Your copyright
#include hello.h
I think you have to remove lib-src/yow.c from the .orig.tar.gz as well.
That file was deleted upstream due to license issues.
Kind regards,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: emacs21-common
Version: 21.4a+1-1
Severity: serious
The manpages for Emacs and Etags have the following license:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any
later version published by
In the new grub package 0.97-2, I no longer see the dreadful message
Error 21: Selected disk does not exist
when running grub unter a 2.4 kernel. AFICT, the only change that can be
responsible for this welcome change is the removal of the odirect.diff
patch, which was supposed to close
Package: libxv1
Version: 1:1.0.1-3
Severity: serious
The copyright file is missing in /usr/share/doc/libxv1. Please add it
as mandated by section 12.5 of the Debian Policy Manual.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Package: ncurses-base
Version: 5.6+20081012-1
Severity: serious
,
| % ls -ld /usr/share/doc/*ncurses*
| drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 19. Okt 08:31 /usr/share/doc/libncurses5
| drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 19. Okt 08:31 /usr/share/doc/libncurses5-dev
| drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 19. Okt 08:31
On 2008-10-23 12:02 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 06:39:20PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
Just noticed that this problem has already been reported against emacs22-el,
and seems not strictly related to mailcrypt.
#429059: emacs22-el: error message in sendmail.el stops
On 2008-10-25 07:58 +0200, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:20:00AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: emacs-goodies-el
Version: 29.3-2
Severity: serious
Hello Peter,
Upgrading from etch to lenny fails with
Hi!
I tried to reproduce this bug in a pristine chroot,
On 2008-10-25 00:20 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: emacs-goodies-el
Version: 29.3-2
Severity: serious
Hello Peter,
Upgrading from etch to lenny fails with
Setting up emacs22 (22.2+2-4) ...
emacs-install emacs22
install/cedet-common: Handling install for emacsen flavor
Package: plink
Version: 1.03p1-1
Severity: serious
The /usr/bin/plink name is already taken:
,
| # aptitude install plink
| [...]
| Selecting previously deselected package plink.
| (Reading database ... 134796 files and directories currently installed.)
| Unpacking plink (from
On 2008-10-25 08:46 +0200, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:15:48AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
- apt-get dist-upgrade then does the upgrade from emacs21 in Etch to
the one in Lenny. Nowhere does it pull in emacs22.
Install the `emacs' metapackage in etch, this will pull
found 503340 26.12-1
notfound 503340 29.3-2
close 503340 27.1-1
thanks
On 2008-10-25 08:25 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-10-25 00:20 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: emacs-goodies-el
Version: 29.3-2
Severity: serious
Hello Peter,
Upgrading from etch to lenny fails
On 2008-11-01 17:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: recite
Version: 1.0-8
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: renders package unusable
When running recite ok, me and two other fairly random lenny users
get a segmentation violation. Also a fairly random sid user
On 2008-11-05 11:01 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Is this still reproducible with the fix for #448470 which should make
portmap initscript more reliable?
At least one user (CC'ed) reported that the initscript did not run at
all, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=490893#25.
severity 506044 serious
retitle 506044 semi: installation succeeds despite byte-compilation errors
thanks
On 2008-11-17 23:55 +0100, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Package: semi
Version: 1.14.6+0.20070618-1
Severity: grave
semi fails if /usr/bin/mail is not executable but does not declare such
On 2008-11-22 18:22 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The weird thing is that it looks like that only dpkg 1.14.23
causes you trouble and not 1.14.22. But the code that deals with
lonely Triggers-Awaited dates back to Mon Aug 11 (commit
587b8d8696cb92a4a18901085db033d44bfe6f32) and dpkg 1.14.21.
On 2008-08-15 11:21 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
mktemp /tmp/$0.$$.X
The problem here is that you are using too short template. Try:
mktemp /tmp/$0.$$.XXX
using only 5 * X as in your version makes your app quite possibly
brute-forceable.
Not really, to make mktemp
I raised the severity to critical as a lot of shell scripts
in Debian rely on this data being random.
Why is that important? The purpose of mktemp is to return a unique
filename and to actually create the file. Can you describe an attack
based on the non-randomness of the filename?
Sven
On 2008-08-15 14:42 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
is there actually a reason for using the PID and for limiting the
non-pid part to [[A-Za-z]?
Why not
bugs included-
--- mktemp-1.5.orig/priv_mktemp.c
+++ mktemp-1.5/priv_mktemp.c
@@ -81,25 +81,20 @@
register char *start,
On 2008-08-15 10:00 +0200, Nigel Horne wrote:
Package: wodim
Version: 9:1.1.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
wodim --devices says:
wodim: No such file or directory.
Cannot open SCSI driver!
For possible targets try 'wodim --devices' or 'wodim -scanbus'.
For
severity 495565 normal
tags 495565 + moreinfo
thanks
On 2008-08-18 20:44 +0200, Esben Stien wrote:
Package: emacs22-nox
Version: 22.2+2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hardly. You're the first to report this, and this package has been
installed successfully on
On 2008-08-18 10:28 +0200, Nigel Horne wrote:
I was running as root, on a default system. Does Debian include root
in the cdrom
group by default?
No, but root doesn't have to be in the cdrom group. Can you please post
the output of `ls -l /dev/s[cgr]*' and `strace wodim -scanbus'?
Sven
On 2008-08-20 12:37 +0200, Nigel Horne wrote:
packard:/home/njh# ls -l /dev/s[cgr]*
ls: cannot access /dev/s[cgr]*: No such file or directory
Okay, so you're using the old IDE cdrom driver instead of libata/sr_mod.
Should not be a problem, though.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On 2008-08-20 12:38 +0200, Nigel Horne wrote:
Strace output attached.
Thanks, it seems that your burner is called /dev/hdc. Is that correct?
write(1, \t1000,2,0 12) 'Optiarc ' 'DVD..., 72 1000,2,0 12)
'Optiarc ' 'DVD RW AD-5170A ' '1.52' Removable CD-ROM
) = 72
Here you go, that
On 2008-08-21 23:38 +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
reassign 495954 aptitude
thanks
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:24:01PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 05:18:50PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I upgraded a machine from Etch to
On 2008-09-04 20:11 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
libssl0.9.8 [2]. which is released under OpenSSL License and the original
SSLeay license, which are not compatible with the GPL [4] [5]. Thus, the
resulting binary is not redsitributable at all.
[snip]
[1]
Package: vm
Version: 8.0.7-1
Severity: grave
VM is unusable, since no autoloads are set up for it. Here are the
relevant (AFAICT) startup files, all empty:
,
| (zsh)% ls -l /etc/emacs*/site-start.d/50vm-init.el
| -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Feb 9 11:50
found 465748 8.0.9-1
thanks
On 2008-02-21 23:13 +0100, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
,
| (zsh)% ls -l /etc/emacs*/site-start.d/50vm-init.el
| -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Feb 9 11:50
/etc/emacs-snapshot/site-start.d/50vm-init.el
| -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Feb 9 11:50
On 2008-02-22 15:56 +0100, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:07:19 +0100, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Thanks, vm-autoloads contains the autoloads in 8.0.9-1. However, the
files /etc/emacs*/site-start.d/50vm-init.el are still empty, so the
autoloads
reopen 465748
thanks
This is not really a package bug. The package does not contain
any file called /etc/emacs*/site-start.d/50vm-init.el; instead, it
ships /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/vm/vm-init.el, which is shipped not
empty.
During installation, ucf is called to
tags 465748 + patch
thanks
On 2008-03-04 10:28 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
I now have it after closely looking at your
/usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/vm script. Here are the
relevant actions in that script with line numbers:
43: ELDIR=/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/$PACKAGE
44
Am 03.05.2008 um 20:05 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
What fails is the update-alternatives invocation in irssi's prerm.
That's because liblocale-gettext-perl was still the old version linked
against perlapi-5.8.*, this causes the symbol lookup error. The new
version had not been unpacked yet.
Probably
On 2008-05-12 08:15 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Ah, right. This work better. Now the xfs process is running as user
nobody. This is the patch.
diff -ur xfs-1.0.6/debian/xfs.init xfs-1.0.6.pere/debian/xfs.init
--- xfs-1.0.6/debian/xfs.init 2008-05-12 08:13:32.0 +0200
+++
Am 16.05.2008 um 15:47 schrieb Andreas Tille:
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Nico Golde wrote:
- sprintf(tmpbuf, wn: invalid search option: %s\n, av[j]);
+ /* Fix CVE-2008-2149: buffer overflows Andreas Tille [EMAIL
PROTECTED] */
+ sprintf(tmpbuf, wn: invalid search
On 2008-04-06 17:37 +0200, James Vega wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 04:32:40PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I *did* read the warning about not reporting bug for dependencies in
devscripts but I really fail to see why there should be an exception in that
package. If I do the same in one of
On 2008-04-07 10:26 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
The reason for this is, that some of the useless cruft, as you call it,
is used by very important scripts in the devscripts collection.
Is this really true for _all_ the recommendations? The long package
description does not mention why
On 2008-04-07 16:12 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 09:24:03AM +0200, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Today's aptitude safe-upgrade failed, apparently aptitude gets into an
endless loop resolving the dependencies:
I was wondering if this would bite
Package: emacs22-common-non-dfsg
Version: 22.2+1-1
Severity: serious
The dired-x info file has moved from emacs22-common to
emacs22-common-non-dfsg, but your package does not declare a Conflicts:
or Replaces: on that package, so unpacking it fails if emacs22-common is
not upgraded yet:
,
|
Now that python is at version 2.5 in sid, this bug seems to have
resolved itself. Should it be closed?
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2008-06-16 13:01 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
If I have use-session-dbus in /etc/X11/Xsession.options, xdm fails
to start sessions:
+ exec /usr/bin/dbus-launch --exit-with-session x-window-manager
XDM authorization key matches an existing client!Error: Couldn't connect to
XServer
I
Package: rt73-source
Version: 1:1.0.3.6-cvs20080623-dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Your package fails to build an rt73-modules*.deb:
,
| % LC_ALL=C m-a -t build rt73
| [...]
| dh_installchangelogs CHANGELOG
| install: cannot stat `CHANGELOG': No such file or directory
|
Package: linux-libertine
Version: 2.8.14-1
Severity: serious
As I discovered in #487979, iceweasel and iceape crash when they try to
load the linux-libertine font. While this is probably a bug in pango,
I'm filing this bug as well to prevent linux-libertine from
transitioning to testing until
On 2008-06-26 12:37 +0200, Marco Delaurenti wrote:
I'm also running amd64, but unfortunately iceweasel (3.0~rc2-2) keeps
crashing. I can confirm that it seems to crash inside pango.
BTW, epiphany-gecko has the same problem.
For another pango crash, see #487979. Maybe this is related to
Package: safe-rm
Version: 0.2-3
Severity: critical
Your usage of dpkg-divert in the maintainer scripts is very dangerous,
because there are several situations where the system may be left without a
functional /bin/rm:
,[ safe-rm.preinst ]
| if [ install = $1 ]; then
| dpkg-divert
On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Package: tetex-ucs
Severity: serious
When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
bounce. The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
IMO, even if it only exists in stable.
Even if the package does not
On 2008-07-08 16:30 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Even if the package does not exist at all? ;-) You're looking for
latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs.
d'oh, sorry about that. latex, tetex, texlive
On 2008-07-08 09:48 +0200, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Changes:
safe-rm (0.2-4) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Move the binary to /usr/bin which removes the need for a diversion
(closes: #489690). Urgency high because of this critical bug.
Thanks for the fast reaction.
On 2008-05-16 13:07 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:16:20 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
Just FYI, I've been running xfs with this patch for the last few days
and don't have any problems. Could this be uploaded to unstable to get
xfs back into testing?
One question
On 2008-05-16 23:43 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Sven Joachim]
Not at all, good catch. I just didn't know it even has a log file.
How about compiling with -DUSE_SYSLOG?
I must admit, I would prefer xfs logging to syslog. When debugging
the segfault in #148650, the first place I
Package: xfs
Version: 1:1.0.7-1
Severity: grave
xfs segfaults at startup, citing /var/log/messages after
/etc/init.d/xfs start:
,
| xfs[5728]: segfault at eip b7df5be3 esp bfa7a95c error 4
`
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
On 2008-05-29 12:39 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Actually, sysv-rc is behaving as intended, designed and documented.
When switching from one runlevel to another, only new start scripts
are executed. So, if portmap want to stop in runlevel 0 and 6 while
starting in runlevels 2-5, it
On 2008-05-29 12:49 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Can you test this patch? It convert the start optimization to a stop
optimization for runlevels 0 and 6.
Index: debian/sysv-rc/etc/init.d/rc
===
---
retitle 485074 emacs21: FTBFS: Segmentation fault on dumping bootstrap-emacs
under Linux 2.6.25
thanks
On 2008-06-08 04:42 +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.4a+1-5.4
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log (on amd64):
...
Finding pointers to doc strings...
On 2008-06-09 18:02 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
A patch is available from [2], I will try to adopt it to the Debian
package later this evening.
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=152791action=view
Imported it as debian/patches/fix-dumping.diff with `quilt import' and
edited debian
tags 485074 + patch
thanks
On 2008-06-09 19:13 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-06-09 18:02 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
A patch is available from [2], I will try to adopt it to the Debian
package later this evening.
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=152791action=view
Imported
Package: libpopt0
Version: 1.14-1
Severity: serious
libpopt0 1.14-11 Conflicts: libpopt-dev (= 1.14-1), making the
latter one uninstallable. Please change the '=' to ''.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386
On 2008-06-11 18:22 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Sven Joachim]
I couldn't really believe it, so I removed /etc/rc4.d/S18portmap,
switched to runlevel 4 with init 4 and rebooted. And voila,
S32portmap ran successfully.
This was an old bug in sysv-rc, now fixed in unstable and testing
On 2008-09-08 13:48 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Actually url.el is not provided only by emacs21 but it is in w3-url-e21,
so I will add a Depends against w3-url-e21. Thanks for the report.
This is not a very fortunate solution, since it forces emms users to
install an obsolete Emacs version.
On 2008-09-09 10:27 +0200, Neil Williams wrote:
The package supports a method of adding unsupported locales but that
this method does not appear to have been used.
Unless the submitter can demonstrate that the existing support is
broken, I think this bug should be downgraded to normal.
It
On 2008-09-09 11:09 +0200, Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 11:03 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
For the record, the path is /usr/local/share/i18n/SUPPORTED (not
/usr/locale/...), and that seems perfectly reasonable, since you don't
want to edit files under /usr locally.
In that case
/debian/changelog
--- dict-devil-1.0/debian/changelog
+++ dict-devil-1.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+dict-devil (1.0-10) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * QA Upload.
+ * Make debian/devil2dict executable to get some content into
+the binary package (Closes: #498829).
+
+ -- Sven Joachim
On 2008-09-13 23:03 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I can do an upload tomorrow, seeing that I did the last upload.
(I suspect it was broken before that, though)
The previous maintainer apparently had built the package with
debian/devil2dict being executable, so the bug did only show up after
reassign 499173 ftp.debian.org
retitle 499173 ftp.debian.org: lzma must be of priority required
severity 499173 serious
thanks
On 2008-09-16 21:04 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
dpkg pre-depends on lzma which is still optional. See §2.5 Policy.
Which means that the priority of lzma needs to be
reassign 499555 apt 0.7.15~exp1
merge 499322 499555
thanks
On 2008-09-19 20:30 +0200, Jason Riedy wrote:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.11.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Ka-boom. Makes installing debug libraries a pain, and I'm on a *slow* network
right
severity 499814 normal
tags 499814 + moreinfo
thanks
Am 22.09.2008 um 18:53 schrieb Juergen Kosel:
Package: libwine-print
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 5.6.10
I fail to see the justification here...
while trying to update libwine-print to 1.0.0-1 it triggers
1 - 100 of 908 matches
Mail list logo
