Source: ulfius
Version: 2.7.15-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch upstream fixed-upstream
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ulfius=armel=2.7.15-2.1=1709168616=0
/<>/src/u_websocket.c: In function
:53.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+lirc (0.10.2-0.8) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-32bit-arches-64bit-time_t.patch: Add
+upstream patch to fix FTBFS on 32-bit arches with 64-bit time_t.
+(Closes: #1066905)
+
+ -- Amin Bandali Fri, 15 Mar 2024
Source: lirc
Version: 0.10.2-0.7
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
In file included from ../lib/lirc_driver.h:18,
from devinput.c:42:
devinput.c: In function ‘devinput_rec’:
devinput.c:461:70: error:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 05:55:31PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-03-11 00:05:54 [+], Amin Bandali wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian, all,
> Hi,
>
> > Will this fix be enough for addressing all cases, though?
>
> I think so. Do you have a test case
Hi Sebastian, all,
Will this fix be enough for addressing all cases, though?
I'm thinking specifically of cases where tarball repacking
is involved, for example when using git-buildpackage's
"gbp import-orig --uscan" where uscan is used to download and
repack the upstream tarball, because the
Source: sdbus-cpp
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: causes dependent packages to fail to build from source
Tags: patch upstream
Dear maintainer,
The upstream sdbus-cpp 1.4.0 release shipped with a problematic
sdbus-c++.pc pkgconfig file that causes dependent packages that
use it
Control: merge 1054359 1054798
Control: tags -1 pending
X-Debbugs-CC: Tobias Frost
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for the bug report. However, this is a duplicate of #1054359,
so I'm merging the two. I have an upload[1,2] pending review and
sponsoring by Tobi - the AM for my DD process - to fix the FTBFS
/d118c24c45674fe8ae75ae96b318a4cb1320
Tobi, if there are still no objections in the coming days, I'd
appreciate it if you'd please sponsor this to unstable for me.
Thanks,
-a
>From d118c24c45674fe8ae75ae96b318a4cb1320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amin Bandali
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 19:54:36 -0
to sponsor it to unstable for me.
Thanks,
-a
>From cbfdd5fb0dcc45639b313eea5cdf2f580be18f52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amin Bandali
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 01:28:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Set user greylist in greylist.conf instead of
milter-greylist.service
---
debian/changelog
Control: tags -1 pending
X-Debbugs-CC: Tobias Frost
Tobi, would you please sponsor this to unstable?
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/milter-greylist
I'll start work on #1002527 shortly.
Thanks,
-a
00:00:00 2001
From: Amin Bandali
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 23:16:05 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] debian/control: Remove 'Conflicts: nex' (Closes: #1051364)
---
debian/changelog | 8
debian/control | 1 -
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/deb
Dear Ondřej,
I just saw you had prepared an NMU version 4.6.4-1.1 for unstable
for this bug per [1,2] but it seems it was never actually uploaded.
I was wondering if there's any particular reason for that, or
if you would consider uploading it, if there's no reason not to?
Thanks,
-a
[1]
Please find attached a patch with an upstream patch to fix this.
Related: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
>From b07acda4afb3056040bd2b07d209b76bec90a988 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amin Bandali
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 21:11:04 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add upstr
Dear Matthias, Felix,
Please find attached a patch that should fix this.
Would one of you please upload it as well?
Thanks,
-a
Description: Fix FTBFS with GCC-13
For more details, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
Author: Amin Bandali
diff --git a/dev/test
Hello,
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> Source: ring
> Version: 20230206.0~ds1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> On 2023-02-08 08:40, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>> jami_20230206.0~ds1-2_amd64.deb: has 5 file(s) with a timestamp too far in
>> th=
>> e past:
>> usr/share/applications/jami.desktop (Thu Jan 1
Amin Bandali writes:
> Hello there,
>
> You might find it more convenient to depend on 'valgrind-if-available'
> rather than 'valgrind' itself, per the attached patch. It also skips
> tests that need valgrind, for problematic arches. What do you think?
To be fully clear, by &
Hello there,
You might find it more convenient to depend on 'valgrind-if-available'
rather than 'valgrind' itself, per the attached patch. It also skips
tests that need valgrind, for problematic arches. What do you think?
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 44fca69..a130223
17 matches
Mail list logo
