Bug#896251: Bug #896251 in python-changelog marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #896251 in python-changelog reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#862899: rsync: insufficient escaping/quoting of arguments

Control: severity -1 normal On Thu, 18 May 2017 13:16:23 +0200 Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: rsync > Version: 3.1.2-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: security upstream > Justification: security-relevant Since there wasn’t any activity on this bug, and there’s no sign of this to

Bug#895320: ps2pdf crashes

Control: reassign -1 ghostscript It doesn't seem like a bug in mk-configure, I don't see anything criminal in the .tex source. -- Cheers, Andrew

Bug#888235: closing 888235

close 888235 thanks -- -- Cheers, Andrew

Bug#833507: wpasupplicant: Unable to connect WLAN (wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-FAILED ret=-22)

On 9 December 2017 at 17:25, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote: > Package: wpasupplicant > Version: 2:2.6-13 > Followup-For: Bug #833507 > > Dear Maintainer, > > I use /etc/network/interfaces to configure networking, not network-manager. > Upgrading wpasupplicant to >= 2:2.6 my

Bug#833507: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#833507: Bug#833507: wpasupplicant: workaround wifi.scan-rand-mac-address=no

On 05/12/17 09:31, Noël Köthe wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > Am Dienstag, den 05.12.2017, 08:57 +0100 schrieb Andrew Shadura: > >>> I remember a workaround for this problem from the past to add >>> into /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf the following: >>&

Bug#833507: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#833507: wpasupplicant: workaround wifi.scan-rand-mac-address=no

On 4 December 2017 at 20:29, Noël Köthe wrote: > Package: wpasupplicant > Version: 2:2.6-11 > Followup-For: Bug #833507 > > Dear Maintainer, > > with one of the sid updates last week my wireless stop > working again with the > wpa_supplicant[737]: wlan0:

Bug#849122: unmerging 849122, bug 849122 is forwarded to https://github.com/lwfinger/rtl8188eu/issues/237

unmerge 849122 forwarded 849122 https://github.com/lwfinger/rtl8188eu/issues/237 severity 849122 normal thanks Hi, I'm unmerging 849122 as should be a separate bug. It should have been worked around since I uploaded an NM snippet to blacklist it for MAC address randomisation, so I'm downgrading

Bug#849077: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#849077: please upgrade wpa and report your experience

On 27/11/17 22:52, Nicolas Kuttler wrote: > On 2017-11-25 10:06, Andrew Shadura wrote: >> I've just uploaded wpa 2.6 into unstable once again. Please upgrade, >> test and let me know if it works for you. > > Hm, installing wpasupplicant:amd64 2:2.6-8 lead to me not be

Bug#849077: please upgrade wpa and report your experience

Hi, I've just uploaded wpa 2.6 into unstable once again. Please upgrade, test and let me know if it works for you. -- Cheers, Andrew

Bug#866194: etcd service fails to start on ppc64le architecture when installing etcd

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 01:54:08 -0500 Harish Sriram wrote: > Package: etcd > Version: 3.1.8+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: 4 > > Dear Maintainer, > Service fails to start while installing etcd package > > I tried installing the etcd

Bug#849077: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#849122: Please adjust the BTS version tracking info

Hi, On 1 July 2017 at 23:32, Francesco Poli wrote: > Dear Debian wpasupplicant Maintainers, > I noticed that these 3 RC bugs (#849122, #849077, #849875) are marked > as found in wpa/2.6-2, which is now superseded by versions with epoch 2. > What seems to have happened

Bug#866656: sparkleshare and webkit1

On 11 August 2017 at 23:16, Jeremy Bicha <jbi...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Andrew Shadura <andre...@debian.org> wrote: >> That's quite a surprise to me. The weekend starts in less than an hour, and >> I get to know only now? > >

Bug#856271: xfonts-base: FTBFS on arm64 due to out of date autoconf files

Package: xfonts-base Version: 1:1.0.4+nmu1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Maintainer, Your package fails to build from source on arm64: dpkg-buildpackage: source package xfonts-base dpkg-buildpackage: source version 1:1.0.4+nmu1 dpkg-buildpackage: source

Bug#856259: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#856259: wpasupplicant: missing dependency on ifupdown

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 27/02/17 04:33, Michael Gilbert wrote: > package: wpasupplicant > severity: serious > justification: policy 3.5 > version: 2.5-2+v2.4-3, 2:2.4-1 > > wpasupplicant relies on ifupdown, but there is no relationship to it > declared in the packaging. > > For example,

Bug#849077: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#849077: new version of wpa-supplicant uploaded -- please test

Hi, On 23 February 2017 at 19:37, Scott Mcdermott <scott.m.mcderm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:36:08 +0100 Andrew Shadura <and...@shadura.me> wrote: >> I have cherry-picked a few patches from the upstream Git repository. > > I tried this on my mbpr 11,

Bug#854719: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#854719: Bug#854719: hostapd: Failed to set beacon parameters

On 10/02/17 00:05, Vincent Danjean wrote: > Le 09/02/2017 à 23:20, Andrew Shadura a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> On 9 February 2017 at 21:10, Vincent Danjean <vdanj...@debian.org> wrote: >>> Package: hostapd >>> Version: 1:2.5-2+v2.4-3+b1 >>> Sever

Bug#854719: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#854719: hostapd: Failed to set beacon parameters

Hi, On 9 February 2017 at 21:10, Vincent Danjean wrote: > Package: hostapd > Version: 1:2.5-2+v2.4-3+b1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hi, > > I just upgraded a machine from jessie to stretch. With the stretch > version of hostapd, the

Bug#849122: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#849122: Wifi stop working with wpasupplicant 2.6-2

Hi, On 14 Jan 2017 16:16, "marcelomen...@gmail.com" wrote: Hi, I'm having this issue as well. For weeks now, every time I forget about it and do an aptitude upgrade I have to manually downgrade to 2.5-2+v2.4-3+b1 because my dongle USB stop working. I'm afraid that in

Bug#851204: libdigidoc: drop the uninstallable libdigidoc-dbg package

Control: reopen -1 On 13 January 2017 at 20:11, Andrew Shadura <and...@shadura.me> wrote: > On 12 January 2017 at 23:12, Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote: >> the libdigidoc package builds both a -dbg and a -dbgsym package. The >> libdigidoc-dbg is now uninstall

Bug#851204: libdigidoc: drop the uninstallable libdigidoc-dbg package

Hi, On 12 January 2017 at 23:12, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > the libdigidoc package builds both a -dbg and a -dbgsym package. The > libdigidoc-dbg is now uninstallable in sid - please remove it from > debian/control. Thanks for the bug report. I don't plan to ship this package in

Bug#849122: Fwd: With 2.6-2 i dont have the wifi adapter in the (network-manager) list available.

-- Forwarded message -- From: data cruncher <dcrunch...@gmail.com> Date: 11 January 2017 at 03:40 Subject: Re: With 2.6-2 i dont have the wifi adapter in the (network-manager) list available. To: Andrew Shadura <and...@shadura.me> Hi Unfortunately not really, there

Bug#849077: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#849077: wpasupplicant: [Regression] Updating wpasupplicant makes not possible to connect to encrypted WiFi

On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 16:39:43 -0300 Lisandro =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dami=E1n_Nicanor_P=E9rez?= Meyer <perezme...@gmail.com> wrote: > On lunes, 26 de diciembre de 2016 20:04:08 ART Andrew Shadura wrote: > > On 26/12/16 19:28, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > > Thanks

Bug#849122: With 2.6-2 i dont have the wifi adapter in the (network-manager) list available.

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 20:41:31 +0100 cruncher wrote: > Me too, i have also that problem. > > When installing 2.6-2, i cant see even the device anywhere (ifconfig nor > network-manager), downgrading to 2.5-2+v2.4-3+b1 works again. > > I'm building

Bug#849077: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#849077: wpasupplicant: [Regression] Updating wpasupplicant makes not possible to connect to encrypted WiFi

On 26/12/16 19:28, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Thanks to Eduard Bloch at [bug] I've tried adding > > [device] > wifi.scan-rand-mac-address=no > > to /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf > > and updating wpasupplicant... and voilá, WiFi is on again. > > [bug]

Bug#849077: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#849077: wpasupplicant: [Regression] Updating wpasupplicant makes not possible to connect to encrypted WiFi

On 22/12/16 17:23, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > 0c:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Limited BCM4322 802.11a/b/g/n Wireless > LAN Controller (rev 01) using broadcom-sta-dkms to get the proprietary driver > (sadly the libre one hangs too much). Note: I've checked with both the >

Bug#849077: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#849077: wpasupplicant: [Regression] Updating wpasupplicant makes not possible to connect to encrypted WiFi

On 22/12/16 17:41, Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 22/12/16 17:23, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: >> 0c:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Limited BCM4322 802.11a/b/g/n Wireless >> LAN Controller (rev 01) using broadcom-sta-dkms to get the proprietary >> driver &g

Bug#849077: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#849077: wpasupplicant: [Regression] Updating wpasupplicant makes not possible to connect to encrypted WiFi

Hi, On 22 December 2016 at 16:46, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Not that I can imagine of, but please do not heasitate in telling me which > details/data might help you. > > So far all I know is what I wrote above. Well, first of all please tell me what

Bug#849077: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#849077: wpasupplicant: [Regression] Updating wpasupplicant makes not possible to connect to encrypted WiFi

Hi, On 22 December 2016 at 15:22, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Package: wpasupplicant > Version: 2.6-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: Makes package unusable > > I upgraded form testing's 2.5-2+v2.4-3+b1 to sid's 2.6-2 and I can't no > longer connect to

Bug#842354: git-phab 1.0.0-2 inaccurate .dsc Dgit field

Control: severity -1 normal On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:27:09 +0100 Ian Jackson wrote: > Package: git-phab > Version: 1.0.0-2 > Severity: serious Well, I disagree it’s serious, at least, it’s not a serious bug in git-phab packaging. > You've told me you're going to

Bug#839446: closing 839446

fixed 839446 4.6.1.3+dfsg-1 close 839446 4.6.1.3+dfsg-1 thanks -- -- Cheers, Andrew

Bug#821543: Bumping severity of PHP 7.0 transition bugs to serious

On 29/09/16 00:35, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le 28/09/2016 à 15:54, Andrew Shadura a écrit : >> On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 13:56:19 +0200 Andrew Shadura wrote: >>>> I am bumping the severity of this bug to serious, as we are going to >>>> remove src:php5 from Debian and y

Bug#821543: Bumping severity of PHP 7.0 transition bugs to serious

On Thu, 5 May 2016 10:20:56 +0200 =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= wrote: > Dear maintainer(s), > > I am bumping the severity of this bug to serious, as we are going to > remove src:php5 from Debian and your package is blocking the first > step which is removal of php5 from

Bug#823162: pseudo: wrong update-alternatives call in postinst

On 1 May 2016 at 18:40, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: > This bug is presumably related to #805937, but I'm reporting it alone as > it prevents a smooth installation of the package. > The pseudo package does not contain the fakeroot-pseudo wrapper (as a > fix for #805937 ?): Oops,

Bug#806714: caffeine: FTBFS (missing comma in the dependencies)

On 30/11/15 12:58, Stephen Kitt wrote: > caffeine 2.8.3-2 doesn't build from source because "python3-gi" needs > a comma in the Depends: stanza of debian/control. Since you did a > source-only upload (nice) it's not available for anyone in unstable! Oops. -- Cheers, Andrew

Bug#802908: requires python3-gi to run

On 24/10/15 23:59, Modestas Vainius wrote: > caffeine uses modules from python3-gi and needs them to run (see below): > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/caffeine", line 25, in > from gi.repository import GObject, Gtk, GLib Thanks Modestas, I'll check it and fix it!

Bug#796303: guessnet: FTBFS: undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traits [..]

On 21/08/15 11:03, Chris Lamb wrote: guessnet fails to build from source on testing/amd64: Chris, I don't maintain or use this package anymore. Also, I know little to nothing about C++11 and the transition, so I don't think I can actually fix this breakage. Should you prepare a patch to fix the

Bug#791230: [pkg-xtuple-maintainers] Bug#791230: nmu diff for openrpt 3.3.7-1.1

Please do.

Bug#787515: tortoisehg: uninstallable in sid

Hello, I've made an NMU (3.4-0.1) to the DELAYED/2 queue. -- Cheers, Andrew pgplOH0IhX4HJ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#760281: Not fixed

,Hi. On 10 February 2015 at 16:44, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote: Quoting Andrew Shadura (and...@shadura.me): Well, I'm running sid. It could happen that a version from testing was installed, but I'm not sure. One more question: is by any chance a reboot mandatory

Bug#760281: Not fixed

Hello, On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:43:57 -0600 John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org wrote: I have a Jessie system running XFCE, just dist-upgraded yet again today, and I'm still seeing this same issue. I am willing to do whatever I can to help. systemd-shim is installed and I am booting with

Bug#760281: Not fixed

Hi, On 10 February 2015 at 15:36, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote: Quoting Andrew Shadura (and...@shadura.me): Hello, On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:43:57 -0600 John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org wrote: I have a Jessie system running XFCE, just dist-upgraded yet again today, and I'm

Bug#766943: reassign 766943 to systemd

Hello, On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 01:13:23 +0100 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: Christoph, thanks for testing and confirming that it works. Andrew, do you have any input/further questions on patch v2? If not, would you be willing to add it to ifupdown and upload it so it get's into jessie?

Bug#769511: Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#769511: netscript-2.4: installation fails

Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: tag -1 wontfix Hello, I don't think I really want to fix this. At least, not at the moment. Sorry. -- Cheers, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#762520: Bug report about the package clearlooks-phenix-theme 5.0.2-1 (unstable)

Control: severity -1 normal Hello, I've uploaded 5.0.2-2, it should fix most of the issues. I'm aware of colours not fully matching, minor glitches with scrollbars and pop-over menus, but this is all I can do for now. I'm reducing severity to normal as the package should be useful now (even

Bug#762520: Bug report about the package clearlooks-phenix-theme 5.0.2-1 (unstable)

Hello, On 25 September 2014 17:29, Etienne MAHE yitiane...@gmail.com wrote: Justification: bad graphical integration with apps based on adwaïta theme. On some apps based on Adwaïta theme and built on the gtk3 architecture like Synaptic or evince, the clearlooks phenix theme let to appear ugly

Bug#762520: clearlooks-phenix-theme: theme is completely broken since the last GTK update

Hello, On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 04:04:33 +0200 Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: I guess since the most recent upgrade of GTK the theme is completely broken. Most important, checkboxes and radio buttons are no longer displayed, you just see an empty space where they should

Bug#759825: audtty: FTBFS: main.c:20:31: fatal error: audacious/audctrl.h: No such file or directory

Package: src Followup-For: Bug #759825 Hi, Łukasz Zemczak from Ubuntu have written a patch: https://patches.ubuntu.com/a/audtty/audtty_0.1.12-4ubuntu1.patch It would be great if you applied it. Or, I could NMU the package. -- Cheers, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#759241: wmauda: FTBFS - audacious/dbus.h: No such file or directory

Hi, I've uploaded an NMU fixing this bug to the DELAYED/7 queue. -- Cheers, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#753705: conky: FTBFS with audacious 3.5: libaudclient removed

Hello, On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 14:18:15 +0100 Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com wrote: It looks like upstream hasn't done any porting work to drop libaudclient, and nobody else has done so either; e.g. Fedora has gone ahead and just dropped audacious support [1], so I plan on doing the same

Bug#753402: gosh segfaults on s390x causing libguess to FTBFS

Hello, On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:52:15 +0200 Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote: The problem is once again the infamous setjmp/longjmp ABI breakage on s390x [1]. Simply rebuilding gauche would fix the problem, but I am not sure it is the best way to deal with it. So, anything new on

Bug#752443: upower 0.99 transition started

Hello, On 16 July 2014 12:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: Andreas, I'd expect a patch from you prior to the upload of a newer upower. I currently have no time nor desire to review the API changes to perform the porting, so a tested and working patch would really help.

Bug#752443: upower 0.99 transition started

On 16 July 2014 13:10, Andrew Shadura andre...@debian.org wrote: Hello, On 16 July 2014 12:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: The package is orphaned but not abandoned. I'm the original author of upower.c. As it worked for me, there was no need to rewrite it until the new

Bug#752443: upower 0.99 transition started

Hello, On 14 July 2014 11:25, Andreas Henriksson andr...@fatal.se wrote: The upower transitions (#751953) has now been started and this makes your package fail to build from source in unstable. Andreas, I'd expect a patch from you prior to the upload of a newer upower. I currently have no time

Bug#753402: gosh segfaults on s390x causing libguess to FTBFS

Control: reassign -1 gauche Hi, It seems like a bug in gauche is causing libguess to FTBFS. Could you please look into this? -- Cheers, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#753684: ifupdown: Dead symlinks in /etc/network/if-pre-up.d block networking

Hello, On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:37:43 +0200 Matthias Urlichs matth...@urlichs.de wrote: Package: ifupdown Version: 0.7.48.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7 (?) # ln -s /not/an/existing/file /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/buggy # ifup eth0 [ one error message and no networking ] …

Bug#753402: libguess: FTBFS on s390x

Hi, On 1 July 2014 16:40, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote: libguess failed to build on s390x. Please take a look at it. The full build log is available at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libguessarch=s390xver=1.2~git20131128.cc43cefc-1stamp=1403693117 This is a

Bug#753402: libguess: FTBFS on s390x

Hi, On 2 July 2014 11:17, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote: But unless configure (it explicitely checks for = 1.2) and the guess_init call are patched, it FTBFS with libguess 1.1 as seen on s390x:

Bug#739370: the problem hasn't been resolved

Hello, On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:37:07 + Raf Czlonka rafal.czlo...@gmail.com wrote: New uploaded version hasn't resolved the issue because both 0.9.4-2 and 0.9.5-1, and possibly earlier, versions introduced a bug where they create '/usr/share/pkg-config-crosswrapper' directory with

Bug#739370: the problem hasn't been resolved

Hello, On 18 February 2014 13:31, Raf Czlonka rafal.czlo...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, that's true; I don't currently know how to solve that issue properly. I've added a check in preinst script to remove that bogus directory, but that won't help with removing broken versions of the package

Bug#732291: files in src/* have license GPLv2+

Hello, On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:28:05 +0100 (CET) Thorsten Alteholz deb...@alteholz.de wrote: as opposed to debian/copyright, which states that the license of all files is GPLv2, the files in src/* have a license of GPLv2+. Please update debian/copyright for the new upstream version (1.0.1)

Bug#732291: Bug#732291: files in src/* have license GPLv2+

Hello, (First of all, I'm not the maintainer of a package.) On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:24:59 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: I don't think it's a bug. If source is distributed as GPL-2+, you're free to take it as either GPL-2, or any later version. As GPL-2 and GPL-3 are

Bug#727073: [ifupdown] Anything new here?

Hello, On 21 November 2013 10:23, David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il wrote: Updated now to 0.7.46-1. Anything new. Bug is a month old. Well, it's not strictly a bug... It's rather incorrect usage. If you use static IPv6 address assignment, you must wait for DAD to complete before using the address.

Bug#727073: [ifupdown] Anything new here?

Hello, On 21 November 2013 10:51, David Baron d_ba...@012.net.il wrote: So a changes notification with instructions may be in order. Issue might not even apply to my setup, but if I do encounter it, where do I change the options? The problem here is that I'm not sure what to do with this bug.

Bug#728092: ifupdown: ifup -v displays wpa-password in cleartext

Control: reassign -1 wpasupplicant Hi, this is a bug in wpa-supplicant's scripts.

Bug#728092: Fwd: Re: Bug#728092: ifupdown: ifup -v displays wpa-password in cleartext

Control: reassign -1 wpasupplicant Hi, this is a bug in wpa-supplicant's scripts.

Bug#728092: ifupdown: ifup -v displays wpa-password in cleartext

Hi, One more thought: wpasupplicant.conf may be what you want.

Bug#724195: Unable to upload a fix for 724195 (RC, FTBFS)

Hi, On 24 October 2013 05:41, Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote: I have just tried to upload a fix for this bug, but it seems that, with the transition from the DMUA flags, I lost the privileges of uploading this one. You can find an updated packaging in any of the following repositories:

Bug#727073: ifupdown: current version somehow brings the ifaces up too late

Hello, On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:11:46 +0200 Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: The major difference between 0.7.44 and 0.7.45 is that 0.7.45 waits for DAD to complete for 'inet6 static' interfaces. Well couldn't that be connected? Since my it seem to be exactly the inet6

Bug#727073: ifupdown: current version somehow brings the ifaces up too late

Hello, On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:27:37 +0200 Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: Since 0.7.45 I see a problem, that many deamons fail to start during boot, since some of the configured addresses are not yet ready, See the following bootlogd snipped, where apache, and bind fail:

Bug#723184: ifupdown: All interfaces fail to come up after 2nd boot. ifup fails to bring up all interfaces.

Hello, On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:09:00 -0700 Mandana lovely.mand...@gmail.com wrote: If I manually run: ifup lo it says link: error fetching interface information: Device not found for ifup eth0 it says: addr: error feching interface information: Device not found I guess you have

Bug#708997: closing 708997

close 708997 thanks Probably not relevant anymore. Please reopen if the problem persists. -- WBR, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#709548: libgtk-3-0: most recent gtk upload breaks.... (nearly) everything (in GNOME)

Hello, On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:23:34 +0200 Loïc Favory loic.fav...@gmail.com wrote: Without downgrading, I succeed to switch back to Adwaita using Gnome Classic session from gdm3... Logging back to gnome shell, and everything is fine with Adwaita. By the way, yesterday I uploaded

Bug#709548: libgtk-3-0: most recent gtk upload breaks.... (nearly) everything (in GNOME)

Control: reassign -1 libgtk-3-0 Well, I guess, then it makes sense to assign the bug back to gtk package. -- WBR, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#707041: ifupdown.postinst: 102: /var/lib/dpkg/info/ifupdown.postinst: Syntax error: else unexpected

Hello, On Tue, 07 May 2013 05:59:45 +0200 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: Todays upgrade failed with the following error message: Setting up ifupdown (0.7.41) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ifupdown.postinst: 102: /var/lib/dpkg/info/ifupdown.postinst: Syntax error: else unexpected dpkg:

Bug#707048: /etc/network/interfaces error

Hello, On 7 May 2013 14:34, szelag bernard bernard.sze...@univ-lille1.fr wrote: after installing new package ifupdown , ifup, ifdown and ifquery exit with error: Already fixed in 0.7.43, see #707052. -- WBR, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#705456: Processed: cloning 705268, reassign -1 to vlan, retitle -1 to don't act on VLAN interfaces supported by ifupdown

A patch fixing the issue. -- WBR, Andrew vlan.diff Description: Binary data

Bug#696642: ifupdown: fails to bring up eth0.xx alias in bridge/vlan setup

Hello, On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:31:35 -0400 Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: Just because it's getting close to the release doesn't mean you can just bypass maintainers when they're actively working on issues. Please stop pulling crap like this... What are you talking about?

Bug#703922: ifupdown: freeze during shutting down

Hello, On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:08:07 +0100 Samuel Hym samuel@gmail.com wrote: After upgrading to version 0.7.6, ifupdown froze my system during shut down, stopping at the DHCPRELEASE step. Reverting to version 0.7.5+nmu1 in testing solves the issue. Thanks for the report, I will upload a

Bug#703922: ifupdown: freeze during shutting down

Hello, On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:11:50 +0100 Samuel Hym samuel@gmail.com wrote: I just had a look to try and see what's going wrong. ifdown gets stuck waiting for dhclient -6 -r -pf /run/dhclient6.eth0.pid -lf /var/lib/dhcp/dhclient6.eth0.leases eth0 to complete, which it never does. Even

Bug#695906: ifupdown: removal of /etc/network/interfaces is not preserved

Hello, On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 05:52:39 -0500 Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:11:16 +0100 Yes, please, dcut it. I plan to incorporate it into the next upload, but it's not yet ready, and I'd prefer to avoid NMUs at this point. I know you didn't want your

Bug#695906: ifupdown: diff for NMU version 0.7.5+nmu1

Hello, On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:11:16 +0100 Josselin Mouette j...@saya.malsain.org wrote: I've prepared an NMU for ifupdown (versioned as 0.7.5+nmu1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Yes, please, dcut it. I plan to incorporate it into the

Bug#692110: [ifupdown] ifupdown renders system unbootable

Hello, On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:39:01 +0100 Christian Frommeyer deb...@frommeyer.name wrote: after updating some packages yesterday the system did not boot any more today. The boot sequence always just stopped after resolvconf. The system would not do anything else than respond to Ctrl+Alt+Del

Bug#684994: ifup: fails to open statefile, does not bring up the network

Hello, On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:14:09 +0200 Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote: After upgrading to sid today, ifup does not work any more: $ sudo ifup eth0 ifup: failed to open statefile /run/network/ifstate: No such file or directory The network is not brought up at all, even e.g.

Bug#684994: ifup: fails to open statefile, does not bring up the network

Hello, On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:02:56 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de wrote: thanks for the quick response. Indeed, /etc/init.d/networking, when run manually, does work. The current sysvinit configuration (with file-rc) is as follows: tglase@tglase-nb:~ $ fgrep netw

Bug#679672: ifupdown: ifup doesn't recognize aliases IPs for vlan in form ethX.Y:A

Hello, On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:21:07 +0300 Adrian Ban adrian@mantech.ro wrote: This patch is integrated in ifup? I'll try to check if is working. You can try it from here: http://ifupdown.org/ifupdown/diff/ifupdown.nw?diff2=bbb51c127dcfdiff1=3852b8ca1fb8 -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc

Bug#679672: ifupdown: ifup doesn't recognize aliases IPs for vlan in form ethX.Y:A

Hello, On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 19:37:57 +0300 Adrian Ban adrian@mantech.ro wrote: After an upgrade of the system the ifup command doesn't recognize anymore the aliases for the VLANs. I have severals vlans configured in /etc/network/interfaces like this: I've just committed a fix. For this:

Bug#656584: initscripts: /run transition: Please update /etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs

Hello, On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:12:03 +0200 MAG4 Piemonte m...@aruba.it wrote: Forgot to ask, which exactly versions? You need initscripts (= 2.88dsf-25). Hi Andrew, we are on Testing so ifupdown version is 0.7 and initscripts version is 2.88dsf-22.1. Regards! Please update to the *latest*

Bug#656584: initscripts: /run transition: Please update /etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs

Hello, On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:27:26 +0200 MAG4 Piemonte m...@aruba.it wrote: Hi Andrew, we update initscripts to version 2.88dsf-27 from unstable and we found that: - Without network-manager boot doesn't stall 3 minutes every NFS mount and they result automatically mounted (everything is

Bug#656584: ifupdown's changed hook handling breaks other packages.

Hello, On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:05:06 +0200 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: Reassigning it back as it really is a bug in NetworkManager. I've asked for further justification. Just saying really isn't. If it is a bug in NetworkManager, then please show me where. auto eth0

Bug#656584: initscripts: /run transition: Please update /etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs

Hello, On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:25:21 +0200 MAG4 Piemonte m...@aruba.it wrote: Hi Andrew, we try the latest ifupdown and initscripts and we found that: Forgot to ask, which exactly versions? You need initscripts (= 2.88dsf-25). -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#675016: ifupdown: don't use PPP updetach option by default

Hello, On Tue, 29 May 2012 03:28:46 -0700 Ian Bruce ian_br...@fastmail.net wrote: I have specified this bug as critical/breaks the whole system, because its effect is that if an external PPP link does not come up for some reason, the system boot fails. It actually gets wedged so hard that

Bug#675016: ifupdown: don't use PPP updetach option by default

Hello, On Tue, 29 May 2012 06:34:59 -0700 ian_br...@fastmail.net wrote: pppd persist maxfail 0 updetach does not return until the PPP link comes up. If this does not happen for some reason, it never returns at all, and the boot sequence stops before any console is available, even in recovery

Bug#674786: netbase: Ignores /etc/network/interfaces except for ipv4 eth0 and lo0

tags 674786 moreinfo thanks Hello, On Sun, 27 May 2012 18:05:22 +0200 Jan Huijsmans huysm...@koffie.nu wrote: After upgrade to netbase 5.0 from 4.47 all entries in /etc/network/interfaces except for eth0 ipv4 and lo0 ipv4 are completely ignored. No virtual interfaces or ipv6 addresses are

Bug#674775: netbase: Netbase ignores /etc/network/interfaces ipv6 settings

Hello, On Sun, 27 May 2012 17:24:38 +0200 Jan Huijsmans huysm...@koffie.nu wrote: Package: netbase Version: 5.0 Severity: critical Tags: ipv6 Justification: breaks the whole system Dear Maintainer, Upgrade from 4.47 to 5.0 resulted in failure to add every static ipv6 address

Bug#673043: new ifupdown does not understand comments in interfaces, breaking existing setups

Hello, On Tue, 15 May 2012 21:26:17 +0400 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote: Interesting. The manpage actually says that in-line coments are NOT supported, but I've never actually noticed this till today. It has always worked, and I guess it was more by incident not by design. But I'd

Bug#665773: is sid affected?

Hello, On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:36:49 +0200 Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote: 2012/4/28 Andrew Shadura bugzi...@tut.by: Really, I don't know, and that doesn't really matter as the version currently in experimental is going to be uploaded to unstable soon (with one modification), so

Bug#665773: is sid affected?

Hello, On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:39:18 +0200 Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote: Also, this bug is tagged sid but the only version where it was found (0.7~beta1) is not in sid. Are the versions in Wheezy / Sid affected? Really, I don't know, and that doesn't really matter as the version

Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools

Hello, On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:52:11 +0200 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: could you clarify what the problem is and why this has RC severity. Severity --- probably not, feel free to justify it to your taste :) The problem is unconditional calls of Linux ifconfig and Linux route from

Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools

Hello, On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:59:28 +0200 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: Are you saying route doesn't exist on kfreebsd or that it doesn't accept the -n command line argument? It does accept it, but acts differently: root@debian:~# route -n usage: route [-dnqtv] command [[modifiers]

  1   2   >