Bug#1051592: Regression: Commit "netfilter: nf_tables: disallow rule addition to bound chain via NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID" breaks ruleset loading in linux-stable

On 9/24/23 13:48, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: The work for bookworm has been done, but for bullseye: would you be able to help here and prepare the fixes? Unfortunatlly the fixes will not apply cleanly. If we fear to much breakage, maybe upstream can be convinced to help? Hi Salvatore, I

Bug#1051592: Regression: Commit "netfilter: nf_tables: disallow rule addition to bound chain via NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID" breaks ruleset loading in linux-stable

On Sat, Sep 16, 2023, 08:37 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi > > Dropping some recipients for the Debian specific handling of this > issue. So AFAIU upstream will not consider this on src:linux side to > be further handled and needs to be addressed in nftables. > > Arturo: With the patches

Bug#1031943: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#1031943: Should we do something?

control: severity -1 important On 3/23/23 16:18, Jeremy Sowden wrote: On 2023-03-23, at 15:58:45 +0100, Alberto Molina Coballes wrote: I agree with Arturo, the proposed change should be harmless, but we were not able to reproduce the issue in any of the test performed so I was thinking to

Bug#1031943: Should we do something?

On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:46:05 +0100 Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, It's been a month since the last entry in this bug, with nobody able to reproduce the bug, and no answer from original submitter. Shall we: - close the bug? - lower severity? - apply the patch? Introducing the proposed change

Bug#1012613: nftables: upgrade stops but does not start service

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 12:21:37 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_G=C3=B6ttsche?= wrote: Package: nftables Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, upgrades of nftables stop the service but do not start it (even if the service is actually enabled). This can lead to lockouts, e.g. when using

Bug#1007829: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#1007829: arptables - Fails to install: Too many levels of symbolic links: debdiff for NMU in DELAYED/2

On 4/6/22 13:29, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, As per discussion on IRC and check of the existing prerm, arptables already has the logic in prerm to clean-up old symlinks, so I didn't touch it. Discussing on #debian-devel, it was agreed we need to clean-up eventual remainings of the

Bug#1007829: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#1007829: Bug#1007829: arptables - Fails to install: Too many levels of symbolic links

On 4/6/22 10:36, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, Please find attached debdiff to fix this bug. I'll be uploading this to DELAYED/2 queue, as this is affecting a lot of people/packages and we need a fix fast. Please let me know if you prefer to fix it yourself and you wish me to "dcut rm" my

Bug#1008222: bind unicast_src x.y.z.w failed 99 - Cannot assign requested address

Package: keepalived Version: 1:2.1.5-0.2+deb11u1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: art...@debian.org Dear maintainer, thanks for your work with this package, really appreciated. Today I tried upgrading a Debian 10 Buster system to Debian 11 Bullseye. Keepalived refused to work with

Bug#985498: missing dependency on cpp

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:09:08 +0100 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: The fix is rather simple: add cpp as Depends for gridengine-common. I'll send a patch/pull request to the salsa repository soon. Pull request: https://salsa.debian.org/hpc-team/gridengine/-/merge_requests/2 Patch also

Bug#985498: missing dependency on cpp

Package: gridengine-common Version: 8.1.9+dfsg-4+deb9u2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Dear gridengine maintaners, thanks for your work on this package, it is really appreciated. I detected the script /usr/share/gridengine/util/arch calls /usr/bin/cpp on line 203: === 8< === x86_64)

Bug#981641: FTBFS with an xsltproc error

On 2/2/21 5:21 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote: On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:25:36PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: I suspect this might be related to this recent change: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-netfilter-team/pkg-nftables/-/commit/4eb323698ee7d8e50132fb271c0f3aa92c727285 Could you

Bug#981641: FTBFS with an xsltproc error

On 2/2/21 2:36 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: Source: nftables Version: 0.9.8-2 Severity: serious Hi, trying to rebuild nftables on sid, I ran into a failure: make[3]: Entering directory '/build/nftables-0.9.8/doc' a2x -L --doctype manpage --format manpage -D . nft.txt a2x -L --doctype manpage

Bug#969058: iptables in buster-backports requires netbase >= 6.0 which is not present in archive

Control: forcemerge -1 969020 On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 20:12:15 + Johan Fleury wrote: > Package: iptables > Version: 1.8.5-3~bpo10+1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, > > Commit d7ad2173[^1] was backported into the debian/buster-backports > branch

Bug#965021: adjust severity

control: severity -1 important This is a bug in a particular option of the software. I'm therefore reducing the bug severity.

Bug#885265: [py3] some fixes to get chirpw running with python3, Fixes #7431

the attached patch. If the patch requires any mangling please do so yourself, I'm on vacations and I don't plan to follow-up on this. regards. # HG changeset patch # User Arturo Borrero Gonzalez # Date 1596733882 -7200 # Thu Aug 06 19:11:22 2020 +0200 # Branch py3 # Node ID

Bug#965021: conntrackd: segfaults when not disabling internal cache

Control: tags -1 confirmed upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1445 On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:04:17 +0200 Thomas Schneider wrote: > Package: conntrackd > Version: 1:1.4.5-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, >

Bug#949518: iptables-restore empty line not accepted any more (regression)

This seems to be fixed by this upstream patch: https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/?id=8e76391096f12212985c401ee83a67990aa27a29 Will try to include this fix in the iptables package soon.

Bug#950637: update build-dep on iptables-dev

Source: xtables-addons Version: 3.7-1 Severity: serious It seems xtables-addons build-deps on iptables-dev, which no longer exists. Please update the build-deps of xtables-addons. You probably need the libxtables-dev package instead. This is apparently preventing the migration of iptables from

Bug#946289: ufw: fails to start with iptables 1.8.4

On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:38:52 -0600 Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > > > I can confirm this. It looks like iptables-restore and iptables6-restore > > in 1.8.4 has broken -n behavior with the nft varieties. > > This is

Bug#947176: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#947176: libiptc.pc non-functional

On 1/11/20 12:04 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Arturo > > On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 15:06:02 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: >> >> 1/ Have a single libiptc-dev package which contains all development files >> 2/ Have a libip6tc-dev package which contains all development files >> related to libip6tc, have a

Bug#944748: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#944748: nftables: no init script

Control: tags -1 wontfix Control: severity -1 normal On 11/14/19 7:00 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > [..] > > However, nftables appears to ship a systemd unit, which is a > clear violation of Policy §9.11: > “However, any package integrating with other init systems > must also be

Bug#932498: issue with iptables -L

Control: severity -1 normal Control: tags -1 = moreinfo unreproducible I can't reproduce this bug: % sudo iptables -L [sudo] password for arturo: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source

Bug#929527: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#929527: Bug#929527: Bug#914694

Control: severity -1 important On 6/26/19 2:28 PM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > > Hmm, but that's a grave issue which may just render the firewall void > for _any_ intermediate chain and produces segmentation faults errors. > The issue you found is not a general-case issue. The segfault is only

Bug#929527: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#929527: Bug#914694

On 6/25/19 10:25 AM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Don't want to nag to much but is there any news regarding this? > Buster is planned to release pretty soon (<2 weeks) and iptables > is quite a important package, IMO. Maybe it went under my radar > but I saw no unblock request on d.o release list. >

Bug#929527: Bug#914694

iptables 1.8.3-1~exp1 is already uploaded, currently waiting in the NEW queue. The upload is for experimental, since the build depends on a newer release of libnftnl (already in experimental), and we are at a point of the Buster freeze that I would like to make extra sure I'm allowed to push such

Bug#929527: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#929527: /usr/sbin/xtables-nft-multi: restoring IP Tables with an self-defined chain segfaults in libnftnl.so

On 5/27/19 12:29 PM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 5/25/19 6:49 PM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >> Package: iptables >> Version: 1.8.2-4 >> Severity: grave >> File: /usr/sbin/xtables-nft-multi >> Justification: renders package unusable by segfaulting on usage

Bug#929527: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#929527: /usr/sbin/xtables-nft-multi: restoring IP Tables with an self-defined chain segfaults in libnftnl.so

On 5/25/19 6:49 PM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Package: iptables > Version: 1.8.2-4 > Severity: grave > File: /usr/sbin/xtables-nft-multi > Justification: renders package unusable by segfaulting on usage > > Reproducer: > # cat simple-segv-table > *filter > :NEW-OUTPUT - [0:0] > -A OUTPUT -j

Bug#927722: Correct fix for this bug

On 4/25/19 12:49 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > Please fine attached to this message the *CORRECT* debdiff to fix it. > I've uploaded it to DELAYED/7 (after dcuting the wrong package...). Let > me know if you think it's still wrong and I should still dcut it... > LGTM

Bug#927722: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#927722: Uploaded to delayed/7

On 4/25/19 11:44 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I've uploaded the fix to DELAYED/7. Debdiff attached. > Let me know if I should dcut rm the upload. > > Cheers, > LGTM

Bug#926728: Removing the package breaks the alternative on usr-merge system

On 4/9/19 6:34 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Package: ebtables > Version: 2.0.10.4+snapshot20181205-2 > Severity: serious > > Hello, > > On system with usr-merge, removing ebtables breaks the alternative. > > The postinst script install symlinks from /sbin to /usr/sbin, in the > prerm script

Bug#912977: iptables: nftables layer breaks ipsec/policy keyword

Control: severity -1 important On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:38:41 +0100 Pierre Chifflier wrote: > > I'm still running some more tests, but I think the severity can be > lowered. > Ok, lowering severity now.

Bug#912046: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#912046: debsums: Error: symlink loop detected in path 'sbin/ebtables'.

On 12/10/18 9:30 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 13:36:11 +0100 gregor herrmann > wrote: > >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 17:39:50 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: >> >> > When running debsums -ac, it complains that: >> > >> > debsums: Error: symlink loop detected in path

Bug#914129: Docker issue with iptables 1.8.2

Control: severity -1 normal Control: unmerge -1 Control: retitle -1 possible issue with docker Let's retitle this to something more meaningfull. Downgrading severity until we see further details on this issue. Also, unmerge this bug report from the unrelated #914129.

Bug#914074: Bug fixed

Control: unmerge -1 Control: fixed -1 1.8.2-2 This bug is different from #914129, unmerging now. Also, this bug is fixed by iptables 1.8.2-2, so closing it now as well.

Bug#913877: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#913877: iptables 1.8.2: ERROR when adding REJECT target to custom chains

On 11/16/18 1:18 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > My kernel version is 3.16.0-4-amd64. > This kernel is very very old. First thing to do is to upgrade your kernel to something modern. Is not related to the hardware. Both x_tables and nf_tables kernel subsystem received severe updates since 3.16. By

Bug#913877: iptables 1.8.2: ERROR when adding REJECT target to custom chains

Control: tag -1 unreproducible On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:20:02 +1300 Amos Jeffries wrote: > Followup experiments isolating the custom sub-chain are showing even > worse behaviour from the new iptables (-nft flavour). > > These commands > > iptables -N test-foo > iptables -I test-foo 1 -s

Bug#913877: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#913877: (no subject)

Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1298

Bug#913877: (no subject)

Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1298

Bug#913877: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#913877: iptables 1.8.2: ERROR when adding REJECT target to custom chains

Control: forward -1 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 Your bug report has been forwarded upstream.

Bug#913088: Bug forwarded upstream

Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1292

Bug#912977: iptables: nftables layer breaks ipsec/policy keyword

Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1290 Hopefully next upstream release will contain a fix.

Bug#911849: Try 1.8.1-2

Control: fixed -1 1.8.1-2 Hi, please try with iptables 1.8.1-2 which I just uploaded. It includes some symlinks to handle this. Please close bug if solved with 1.8.1-2. thanks for the report! :-)

Bug#889649: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#889649: FTBFS with debhelper 10

On 7 August 2018 at 11:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:04:59 +0100 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez > wrote: >> On 5 February 2018 at 11:08, Daniel Baumann >> wrote: >> > Package: iptables >> > Version: 1.6.2-1 >> > Severity: normal >>

Bug#897592: ebtables: randomly FTBFS - makefile is not parallel safe

On 3 May 2018 at 12:07, James Cowgill wrote: > When parallel builds are enabled, the "scripts" and "exec" targets will > be run in parallel which fails because: > - exec does not create $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR) so will fail if scripts has > not created it yet. > - exec copies

Bug#895342: suricata: new version fails to start if eth0 not present

Control: severity -1 normal On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:30:56 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > > There is at least one bug here in the package, which is that the > autopkgtests make a brittle assumption that eth0 will be available in the > test bed. eth0 is a legacy

Bug#895342: suricata: new version fails to start if eth0 not present

If you check debian/tests/systemd-service-test.sh [0], the interface in use by the config file is decided at runtime. What autopkgtest tests are you running? This seem like an ubuntu specific issue. All tests in debian are going fine, both in unstable and in testing [1]. This Debian bug may

Bug#881580: googleearth-package: Generated package is uninstallable, and application unrunnable

On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:18:54 -0800 Dima Kogan wrote: > Package: googleearth-package > Version: 1.2.2dima1 > Severity: grave > > Hi. I'm installing googleearth on a recent Debian/sid on amd64. Clearly > I need to have the i386 foreign arch enabled. It'd be nice if the > install

Bug#868059: tc: m_xt: Segfault with iptables-1.6.0

On 22 November 2017 at 18:28, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > Control: tag -1 pending > > Hi Gabor, > > (I'm cc-ing the iptables maintainers so that they can correct me if I'm > wrong in my findings below; iproute2's maintainer Alexander; and Julian >

Bug#878948:

Control: found -1 17.2.2-1

Bug#873832:

Control: tags -1 pending Thanks, I did the change and is now pending: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-suricata/pkg-suricata.git/commit/?id=93ee9030a53a45c800ad5879c4e7c754c1dc1331

Bug#863518: nftables: "workstation" example breaks alternate keyboard layout in gdm

Control: severity -1 normal On 28 May 2017 at 00:54, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote: > > Bizarrely, the quite simple "workstation" example causes the language picker > in > gdm3 to disappear and the default layout to switch back to qwerty. As far as > I > can tell this

Bug#862400: several bios updates exist since 2007

On Mon, 15 May 2017 13:56:24 +0200 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@debian.org> wrote: > (please keep me in CC) > > On Sat, 13 May 2017 06:16:44 +0200 franckr <franck...@online.de> wrote: > > Hi Arturo, > > > > I cannot help for kernel, however, and you pro

Bug#862400: several bios updates exist since 2007

On Mon, 15 May 2017 13:56:24 +0200 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@debian.org> wrote: > > But the question remains, is this some kind of kernel regression? > > BTW, I can give ssh access to the machine, running 4.7, for testing pourposes.

Bug#862400: several bios updates exist since 2007

(please keep me in CC) On Sat, 13 May 2017 06:16:44 +0200 franckr wrote: > Hi Arturo, > > I cannot help for kernel, however, and you probably already know it: > Several bios updates became available since 10/04/2007 version. > Did you consider them ? (ie checking release

Bug#859775: iptables: iptables-save fails for rules using hashlimit on 32-bit architectures

On 10 April 2017 at 11:57, Niels Thykier wrote: > > It appears that upstream is ok with the patch except some minor > whitespace issue they are going to fixup themselves[1]. > That's true. However, I don't see the patch in the git tree [0] yet. [0]

Bug#859775: iptables: iptables-save fails for rules using hashlimit on 32-bit architectures

On 7 April 2017 at 13:51, James Cowgill wrote: > > Here's a patch, which I also sent to netfilter-devel. > Thanks James, I will wait for the upstream review. If upstream accepts the patch then I will apply it to our package. best regards.

Bug#855573: suricata: fails to install: update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/bin/suricata.generic doesn't exist

On 20 February 2017 at 10:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: suricata > Version: 3.2.1-1~exp1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As > per definition of

Bug#855281: marked as pending

19315e859a26d3242e4bb21e6d8fe9dbf5cf212e Author: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@debian.org> Date: Thu Feb 16 14:15:50 2017 +0100 d/changelog: generate entry for 1:1.4.4+snapshot20161117-5 unstable Using gbp dch. Git-Dch: Ignore Signed-off-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@d

Bug#820974: Git commit for #820974 which was uploaded to unstable

820974 Signed-off-by: Marc Haber <mh+debian-b...@zugschlus.de> Signed-off-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@debian.org> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 0601dc24c..692756e84 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +bind9 (1:9.10.3.dfsg

Bug#820974: plans for bug #820974

Hi, I'm planning a NMU for this to debian unstable in the short term.

Bug#820974: plans for bug #820974

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:06:08 -0500 Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > > could you please share yours plans regarding this bug? > > Patches welcome? > Indeed, please see message 35 [0] in t

Bug#853931: Processed: Problem is also in the version in stretch

Control: notfound -1 3.2-2 On 3 February 2017 at 13:14, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> >> Do you mean that the same source package FTBFS using debian stretch only? > > The "build dependencies are not strict enough" problem is also in 3.2-2. > > stretch might happen to have recent enough

Bug#853931: Processed: Problem is also in the version in stretch

On 2 February 2017 at 19:54, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> found 853931 3.2-2 Hi Adrian, could you please elaborate a bit more? suricata version 3.2-2 was uploaded source-only, and it seems it was build just

Bug#853931: FTBFS: dh_install: debian/suricata-hyperscan.install returned exit code 127

On 2 February 2017 at 10:59, James Cowgill wrote: > > I believe you need both debhelper and dh-exec from jessie-backports to > make this work. > Thanks James, it works!! :-)

Bug#853931: FTBFS: dh_install: debian/suricata-hyperscan.install returned exit code 127

Source: suricata Version: 3.2-2~bpo8+1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, the suricata package fails to build from source in jessie-backports [0] in several architectures, in which hyperscan is not available. The pattern is always the same: [...] cp -a

Bug#820974: plans for bug #820974

Dear maintainer, could you please share yours plans regarding this bug? best regards

Bug#820974: bind9 crypto issue

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:38:32 -0700 LaMont Jones wrote: > > Can you provide a named.conf that reproduces the issue? > file named.conf: === 8< === include "/etc/rndc/rndc.key"; controls { inet 1.1.1.1 port 953 allow { 2.2.2.2; }

Bug#845464: fixed in iptables 1.6.0+snapshot20161117-4

Hi, this seems fixed in iptables/libxtables12 1.6.0+snapshot20161117-4, isn't it? Please, confirm and close the bug.

Bug#846766: race condition in the build process?

On 6 December 2016 at 11:06, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > 2. work around it by disabling parallel building: > - dh $@ --with systemd,autotools-dev > + dh $@ --with systemd,autotools-dev --no-parallel > > Thanks Adrian, I think I will take this simple approach by now. best

Bug#846766: weird FTBFS

Weird, Here amd64 which is good: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=conntrack-tools=amd64=1%3A1.4.4%2Bsnapshot20161117-2=1480672733 Here arm64 which presents the same issue as reported by you:

Bug#846766: race condition in the build process?

Hi, from the logs: [...] read_config_lex.l:25:28: fatal error: read_config_yy.h: No such file or directory #include "read_config_yy.h" ^ compilation terminated. Makefile:662: recipe for target 'read_config_lex.o' failed make[3]: *** [read_config_lex.o] Error 1

Bug#844421: marked as pending

ec16499b24b8ef4bf116f371f2e3c15af89e14ce Author: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@debian.org> Date: Tue Nov 29 11:09:14 2016 +0100 d/changelog: generate entry for 1.9-5 unstable Using gbp dch. Git-Dch: Ignore Signed-off-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@debian.org> diff --git a/debian/change

Bug#845278: closed by Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <art...@debian.org> (Bug#845278: fixed in iptables 1.6.0+snapshot20161117-3)

reopen thanks On 22 November 2016 at 14:36, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > This isn't actually fixed, "<<" doesn't mean what you think it means. It only > applies to version that are strctly lower than 1.6.0+snapshot20161117-1, not > lower or equal. The upgrade is still

Bug#844908:

merge 844421 thanks

Bug#844421: reassign to pycodestyle

Hi, upstream reports this is an issue with pycodestyle which is used by flake8. I'm doing the reassign now.

Bug#844421: [Pkg-rpm-devel] Bug#844421: rpmlint: FTBFS (failing tests)

On 15 November 2016 at 16:12, Santiago Vila wrote: > Package: src:rpmlint > Version: 1.9-4 > Severity: serious > > Dear maintainer: > > I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" > (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) > but

Bug#812303: synergy: diff for NMU version 1.4.16-1.1

On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:33:44 -0500 Joshua Honeycutt wrote: > Control: tags 812303 + patch > Control: tags 812303 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for synergy (versioned as 1.4.16-1.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if

Bug#841352: libnftnl: FTBFS (testsuite error) on Big Endian Architectures

On 19 October 2016 at 20:20, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Source: libnftnl > Version: 1.0.6-2 > Severity: serious > > Hi, as you know, the current package is not migrating because of testsuite > failures on BE architectures. > > Unfortunately I don't have a patch, but

Bug#739251: iptables: Upgrade breaks existing rules (and is not documented)

Control: fixed -1 1.6.0-2 Hi, there has been no modifications of the syntax from 1.4.21-2 onwars, so I guess we can consider 1.6.0-2 fixed (i.e, migrating from 1.4.21-2 to 1.6.0-2 should causes no issues). thanks, best regards. -- Arturo Borrero González

Bug#801853: sheepdog: corosync transition: update build-deps

Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.g...@gmail.com> Date: Thu Oct 15 11:42:42 2015 +0200 d/control: update build-deps on corosync libcorosync-dev no longer exists. Signed-off-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.g...@gmail.com> diff --git a/debian/control b/de

Bug#795096: nftables: Missing license in d/copyright.

Control: tags -1 + pending On 10 August 2015 at 17:22, Vincent Blut vincent.deb...@free.fr wrote: The file from which the man page is generated ('doc/nft.xml') is licensed under the terms of the CC BY-SA 4.0, so let’s add that to 'debian/copyright'. Patch attached! Applied, thanks Vincent.

Bug#794276: opencollada: FTBFS on mipsel

Package: opencollada Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Dear maintainer, opencollada FTBFS on mipsel [0]. Apart of this bug, I've opened an upstream issue as well [1]. I've reproduced the issue locally in my mipsel machine. I will keep this bug updated with all future

Bug#794278: madness: FTBFS on mipsel

Source: madness Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Dear maintainer, madness seems to FTBFS on mipsel [0]. Apart of this bug, I've opened an upstream issue as well [1]. I reproduced the issue locally in my mipsel machine. Will keep this bug updated with news as they

Bug#794273: nim: FTBFS on mipsel

Package: nim Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Dear maintainer, nim seems to FTBFS on mipsel [0]. I've reproduced the issue locally in my mipsel machine. I've opened an upstream issue [1] and will update this bug as soon as any news happens.. best regards. [0]

Bug#793010: pax-utils: FTBFS on mipsel: FAIL: lddtree.py.list

On 27 July 2015 at 16:44, Tomasz Buchert tom...@debian.org wrote: On 24/07/15 14:49, Tomasz Buchert wrote: [...] * you should confirm that python-pyelftools ignore dynamic linker configuration (I suspect this is true); it would be good to extract a minimal Python program using

Bug#793010: pax-utils: FTBFS on mipsel: FAIL: lddtree.py.list

Control: tags -1 patch On 28 July 2015 at 13:14, Tomasz Buchert tom...@debian.org wrote: I'm not sure there is such a thing, but the upstream authors have been very reponsive. Btw, I may have found the problem, I attach a patch, which has been sent to upstream authors. It passes all tests, but

Bug#793010: pax-utils: FTBFS on mipsel: FAIL: lddtree.py.list

On 20 July 2015 at 15:08, Tomasz Buchert tom...@debian.org wrote: Well, upstream is already working on this. In fact, the test above passes in the new version (which I've just pushed to collab-maint), but the next one fails. You may try to pinpoint the problem, but it is very likely the fact

Bug#793010: pax-utils: FTBFS on mipsel: FAIL: lddtree.py.list

Package: pax-utils Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear maintainer, as you can see at buildd [0], pax-utils FTBFS on mipsel. The final part of the log is: [...] ../dotest.cmp FAIL: lddtree.py.list --- lddtree.py.list

Bug#793011: castxml: FTBFS on mipsel: failed tests

Package: castxml Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Dear maintainer, just want to let you know I'm working towards a fix for the FTBFS of castxml on mipsel [0]. There are some tests that are failing. I just opened a bug [1] in the upstream issue tracker. best regards.

Bug#793012: gmp-ecm: FTBFS on mipsel: bad assembly?

Package: gmp-ecm Version: 6.4.4+ds-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Dear maintaner, Just to let you know gmp-ecm FTBFS on mipsel [0]. It seems the generated assembly is somehow bad. I'm working towards a fix. best regards. [0]

Bug#791830: patch fix for bedtools FTBFS on mipsel

control: -1 tags + patch Dear maintainer, find attached a patch to fix the FTBFS issue on mipsel. The patch was generated from a upstream commit [0]. I tested it in my mipsel machine and it works :-) Thanks, best regards. [0]

Bug#791830: bedtools FTBFS on mipsel: opened upstream bug

Hi, just to let you know I opened an upstream issue [0]. best regards. [0] https://github.com/arq5x/bedtools2/issues/271 -- Arturo Borrero González -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#790855: sdrangelove mipsel build issues: ICE

Hi there, I contacted upstream to let them know the issue. A couple of commits were pushed to their git [0]. However, I now hit an ICE (internal compiler error): [...] [ 38%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/sdrbase.dir/sdrbase/gui/glspectrum.cpp.o /usr/bin/c++ -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB

Bug#719367: node-raptor on mipsel

Hi, after a month of no movements upstream, I feel we are hitting a dead project upstream. My intention is to give up in this issue :-( -- Arturo Borrero González -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#791753: strace: FTBFS on mipsel: sys_syscall undeclared (and more)

Package: strace Version: 4.9-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear maintainer, as reported in buildd [0], strace FTBFS on mipsel. [...] In file included from ../linux/mips/syscallent.h:3:0, from

Bug#791830: bedtools: FTBFS on mipsel

Source: bedtools Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source Dear maintainer, as you can see at buildd [0], bedtools FTBFS on mipsel. I just want to let you know I've reproduced the issue locally in my mipsel machine and I'm working towards a fix. best regards.

Bug#791830: bedtools: FTBFS on mipsel

On 8 July 2015 at 20:40, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez arturo.borrero.g...@gmail.com wrote: as you can see at buildd [0], bedtools FTBFS on mipsel. Missing reference: [0] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bedtoolsarch=mipselver=2.24.0-1stamp=1436289056 -- Arturo Borrero González

Bug#719367: node-raptor on mipsel

Dear maintainer, just to let you know that I'm working toward a fix. I have a patch to switch from node-waf to node-gyp, but I get a weird error on my mipsel machine. I opened 2 upstream bugs [0][1], as feel a bit lost on how to proceed. Any hint would be really appreciated. Thanks, best

Bug#790855: sdrangelove: FTBFS on mipsel

Package: sdrangelove Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source Dear maintainer, as buildd reports [0], sdrangelove FTBFS on mipsel. At first, it seems an issue with the '-msse2' switch. If I patch the package to delete the switch, then other error happens:

Bug#789187: moarvm for mipsel

Control: reopen -1 Dear maintainer, I'm reopening this bug as we really want moarvm for mipsel. Do you have any news regarding the latest upstream release? thanks, best regards -- Arturo Borrero González -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

  1   2   >