Hi Simon
This is embarassing but I found now what was the issue. There is one
package that I installed some months ago that was not from Debian
repos and for some reason it installs /lib/libusb. It's not even a
deb file which is why dpkg-query does not know about it.
The package in question is
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 21:47, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 19:14:54 +0100, David Miguel Susano Pinto wrote:
>> gnome-boxes does not start. Trying from command line, issues this error:
>>
>> $ gnome-boxes
>> gnome-boxes: symbol lookup error:
>>
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:30:55 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:24:09PM +0100, carandraug wrote:
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> After the update to 1.27.7-1~deb9u4 (from 1.27.7-1~deb9u3), the mediawiki
>> site
>> errors in all pages with:
>>
>> Exception encountered,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 16:56, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Carnė,
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 04:53:31PM +0100, Carnė Draug wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 10:33, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > >
> > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/gbrowse_2.56+dfsg-4.rbuild.log.gz
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 10:33, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Carnė,
>
> I have not checked but I could imagine that this issue is somehow
> connected to the the new upstream version of bioperl. Since you
> intended to to restructure the bioperl packages I think this is a good
> point in time. Since
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 15:47, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 03:32:47PM +, Carnë Draug wrote:
> >
> > Well, all those regressions are because they can't install bioperl
> > which is their dependency. There is no issue on themselves or in
> >
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 14:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Carnė,
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:59:45PM +, Carnė Draug wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 14:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > This is what I've though about: Removing the files from bioperl-run
> > > (which would be 1.7.2-5 then)
>
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 14:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:18:26PM +, Carnė Draug wrote:
> > I guess the fix for this is to have in bioperl's d/control:
> >
> > Breaks: libbio-perl-run-perl (<< 1.7.3)
> >
> > It would be nice if upstream did a new release of
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 14:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to have a look at the issue caused by t-coffee 12 which became
> visible in the smoke test of libbio-tools-run-alignment-tcoffee-perl.
> Liubov had checked it before and filed an issue upstream[1] but at my
> side the test to
On 3 July 2018 at 14:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the bug log of #790196[1] shows that rasmol in its current state will
> not be distributable with Buster. Upstream is dead so if we want to
> keep it in Debian we have the option:
>
>1) Port it to Gtk+ 3 (see porting guide [2])
>2)
Package: imagej
Version: 1.44c-1
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
Fresh install of imageJ doesn't start. When started from a terminal returns
the
error
carandr...@altar:~$ imagej
/usr/bin/imagej: line 32: /usr/sbin/update-java-alternatives: No such file
or
directory
Open
11 matches
Mail list logo
