Package: gitlab
Version: 12.8.8-6+fto10+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Gitlab 12.8.8 installation fails.
Log:
Bundle complete! 198 Gemfile dependencies, 362 gems now installed.
Gems in the groups development and test were not installed.
Use `bundle info
Package: gitlab
Version: 12.2.9-1+fto10+1
Followup-For: Bug #944596
More info about the bug:
- Deleting file active_record_mysql_timestamp.rb, fails on
active_record_mysql_timestamp.rb, because the same error, "undefined method
mysql?".
Error MSG:
NoMethodError: undefined method
Package: gitlab
Version: 12.2.9-1+fto10+1
Followup-For: Bug #944596
Hi,
I have exactly the same problem. Installation are originally on gitlab 8, until
yesterday working without problem on 12.1
NoMethodError: undefined method `mysql?' for Gitlab::Database:Module
Package: gitlab-shell
Version: 8.3.3+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Doing a git push on a repository connected to gitlab, I receive this error:
BloudFire:repository maqui$ git push origin
/usr/share/gitlab-shell/bin/gitlab-shell:10:in `require_relative': cannot
Package: ruby-gitaly
Version: 0.99.0+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Gitaly gem requires grpc gem in version 1.10 to work, but, deb package doesn't
force installation of this package.
In that case, ruby-gitaly is unusable.
Error message:
Bundler could not find
Package: gitlab
Version: 10.5.6+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Installing gitlab 10.5.6 do not work because a problem on sprockets.
This error is also on old 10.5.5 and 9.5.4 versions.
Thanks,
Precompiling assets...
Package: gitlab
Version: 10.5.5+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Gitlab 10.5.5+dfsg-1 and 10.5.5+dfsg-2 fails to install.
The machine have a gitlab 9.5.4 installed (since Experimental upload),
upgrading to 10.5.5 on unstable.
This is the error on installation:
On 14Oct05:2254+0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Also, the re-evaluation happened. It however didn't had the outcome
you wanted (basically because the web browser needs so many security
updates which only could be done by backporting all of it that the
embedded copy doesn't make any difference -
On 14Sep24:1951+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 24.09.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Craig was so kind and provided me with access to the VM images.
With that image I was able to reproduce the upgrade failure.
I checked the systemd state before the upgrade and noticed that
On 14Sep24:1424-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
Maybe I should be a full-time tester--I seem to be pretty
good at it. I built another vm from the D-I beta,
pointed sources.list at sid, and ran aptitude update,
all as before. This time, though, I held all updates
while installing dbus 1.8.8-1
On 14Sep23:0023+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Yeah, this would be perfect
By way of a feasibility test, I had virt-manager
Shut Down == Save the a762146 vm at its ready for
first login state and have put the tarball of the
124MB file it created in /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/save
up at
On 14Sep23:0956-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
By way of a feasibility test, I had virt-manager
Shut Down == Save the a762146 vm at its ready for
first login state and have put the tarball of the
124MB file it created in /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/save
up at
http://dlc.casita.net/~dlc/762146
Another datum: I decided to try switching back to
systemd-sysv on my primary bare-metal Sid and the
update was textbook:
ii libpam-systemd:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd-id128-0:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd-journal0:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd-login0:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd-login0:i386
On 14Sep23:1719-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
Another datum: I decided to try switching back to
systemd-sysv on my primary bare-metal Sid and the
update was textbook:
ii libpam-systemd:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd-id128-0:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd-journal0:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd
On 14Sep21:2011+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
What were the exact error messages you got?
Please provide the dpkg log and the output from journalctl -alb
I ran the test case again and obtained the same results
from aptitude dist-upgrade and began receiving the kernel
messages about journald as
On 14Sep23:0016+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 22.09.2014 um 23:23 schrieb David L. Craig:
On 14Sep21:2011+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
What were the exact error messages you got?
Please provide the dpkg log and the output from journalctl -alb
I ran the test case again and obtained
On 14Sep22:0005+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 21.09.2014 um 23:28 schrieb David L. Craig:
No, but, as the report mentioned, the vm failure was
preceded by a similar result doing the daily update
of the main non-vm Sid instance on the box, which is
why I reproduced it using reproducible
Package: udev
Version: 215-4
Severity: grave
Installed Beta 1 D-I amd64 netinst without mirror or
standard utils in preparation for dist-upgrade to Sid
using aptitude with sources.list:
deb ftp://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian/ sid main
udev and aptitude reported replacing 208-6.
udev fails first
Correction:
udev and systemd reported replacing 208-6.
^^^ not aptitude
--
not cent from sell
May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!
Dave_Craig__
So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
You'd better rearrange your
On 12Aug15:1037+0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2012-08-15 09:48, David L. Craig wrote:
I updated all the nvidia packages when I saw the new versions
but the problem persists. I am including the most recent kern.log
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-rt-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Please
Package: nvidia-glx
Version: 302.17-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I had installed Sid into an available partition and X was happy with
nouveau. nvidia was functioning well under Linux Mint Xfce 13. After
installing the nvidia packages and porting the Mint xorg.conf
a
helpuful bug report.
This bug will be fixed when the new upstream version is packaged and
uploaded, I expect this process to last no more than five days.
Thank you for reporting this bug,
David L. Moreno
On 9/3/05, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: kimdaba
Version: 2.0-4
22 matches
Mail list logo
