level
EVP interface?
The reason I ask is it would be pretty trivial to modify md5module.c to
use the openssl API for any digest, and would be less risk than
fresh-coding one.
--
Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
G'day,
From: Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 11, 2005, at 6:11 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote:
[...]
Given that Python is already dependant on openssl, it makes sense to
change
md5sum to use it. I have a feeling that openssl internally uses md5,
so this
way we wont link against two
be to including the source in Python sources.
FWIW, I also have an md4sum module and md4c.c implementation that I'm
happy to contribute to Python (done for pysysnc).
--
Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 21:30 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:52 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
[...]
One possible alternative would be to bring in something like PyOpenSSL
http://pyopenssl.sourceforge.net/ and just
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 23:13 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 21:30 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote:
[...]
Only problem with this, is pyopenssl doesn't yet include any mdX or sha
modules.
My bad, how about M2Crypto http
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 17:15 +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
[...]
I think it would be cleaner and simpler to modify the existing
md5module.c to use the openssl md5 layer API (this is just a
search/replace to change the function names). The bigger problem is
deciding what/how/whether to include
6 matches
Mail list logo
