Bug#1012097: NIS broken in sid

Package: libnssswitch-nis Version: 3.1-4 Severity: grave It seems that currently unstable has a totally not working NIS binding for users. I performed my trials using an existing setup (bullseye-based NIS master+slaves and clients network in the real life). I recently upgraded a bullseye NIS

Bug#981739: manpages-posix: no-one built the package for debian archive (non-free, source-only upload)

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:58:27PM +0200, Juhani Numminen wrote: Package: manpages-posix Version: 2017a-1 Severity: grave Hello, The latest upload of manpages-posix was source-only but was not built on the buildd network either. So, no binaries are available. I think the text of this lintian

Bug#977349: Current package does not ensure a smooth upgrade from stable due to breakage of past config and new binary modules.

Source: proftpd-dfsg Version: 1.3.7a+dfsg-2 Severity: serious After upgrade: $ sudo proftpd -t Checking syntax of configuration file 2020-12-14 09:59:09,942 legolas proftpd[5444]: mod_dso/0.5: unable to load 'mod_tls.c'; check to see if '/usr/lib/proftpd/mod_tls.la' exists 2020-12-14

Bug#973630: fetchmail: OpenSSL library mismatch

Package: fetchmail Version: 6.4.13-1 Followup-For: Bug #973630 I can confirm this issue and it can be solved by a rebuild by a simple bNMU. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Bug#892373: [INFO] Bug#892373: proftpd-mod-fsync FTBFS with proftpd 1.3.6-1

Nave a look onto Castaglia's github repo Il 09 marzo 2018 23:11:56 CET, "Hilmar Preuße" ha scritto: >On 09.03.2018 16:28, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > >Hi, > >> Here the fix is trivial as suggested. Even in this case it is better >> upgrading to current upstream version. >>

Bug#820984: proftpd-basic: cannot preseed / ignores local config changes

Package: proftpd-dfsg Version: 1.3.5b-2 Followup-For: Bug #820984 About this, we are going to drop the non-standalone support in maintainer scripts for the following reasons: - inetd/xinetd/systemd support is of little interest for a serious ftp server - maintainer scripts cannot currently

Bug#740813: wrong path for .cmake file

Package: libinsighttoolkit4-dev Version: 4.5.0-3 Severity: serious All *.cmake files (platform independent) should go under /usr/share/cmake as for other packages, not in /usr/lib/cmake. See shared-desktop-ontologies for instance. Also eventually consider an -all common package for them insted

Bug#736334: Sqlite3 backend not more working

Package: gnucash Version: 1:2.6.0-1 Severity: grave I use gnucash daily, with the sqlite3 backend for all my stuff. Today after updating my this sid box, gnucash is not more able to load any sqlite3 gnucash file (with a message like: no suitable backend found for file .gnucash). All worked

Bug#679220: Conflicting with therion-doc, please add suitable Breaks/Conflicts

Package: therion-viewer Version: 5.3.9-3 Severity: serious Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: therion-viewer 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 132 not upgraded. 544 not fully

Bug#679227: It fails upgrade

Package: tex-common Version: 3.13 Severity: serious In upgrading tex-common it results: Can't locate TeXLive/TLUtils.pm in @INC (@INC contains: //tlpkg /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14

Bug#661018: FTBS due to new freexl

Package: spatialite-bin Version: 3.0.0~beta20110817-3 Severity: serious File: /usr/bin/spatialite libtool: compile: gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\libspatialite\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\libspatialite\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\3.0.0-beta\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\libspatialite 3.0.0-beta\

Bug#657442: Installing libhdf5-7 requires pull out a bounce of package depending on a previous version, and the previous version.

Package: libhdf5-7 Version: 1.8.8-5 Severity: serious $ sudo apt-get install libhdf5-7 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libgl2ps0 libqwt6 mpi-default-dev

Bug#656427: hdf5-helpers collides with hdf5-tools at upgrade time

Package: hdf5-helpers Version: 1.8.8-2 Severity: serious (Sorry for localized output pasting) Selecting previously unselected package hdf5-helpers. (Lettura del database... 352194 file e directory attualmente installati.) Estrazione di hdf5-helpers (da .../hdf5-helpers_1.8.8-2_i386.deb)... dpkg:

Bug#612264: tk-tile and tk colliding dir

Package: tcl-dev Version: 8.4.16-2 Severity: serious Unpacking replacement tcl-dev ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tcl-dev_8.5.0-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/include/tcl', which is also in package tk-tile 0.8.2-2.1 configured to not write apport reports

Bug#602279: Buffer overflow in netio

Package: proftpd-dfsg Version: 1.3.3a-4 Severity: serious Tags: security See http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3521 This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of ProFTPD. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.

Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable

Package: virtualbox-ose Version: 3.2.8-dfsg-2 Severity: grave /etc/init.d/virtualbox-ose start fails with: Oct 4 09:27:38 blegrez kernel: [ 247.934129] supdrvGipCreate: failed to allocate the GIP page. rc=-8 This is for sure true on i386 and does not allow rebuilding of modules too. --

Bug#579760: Conflicting with libopenthreads12

Package: libopenthreads13 Version: 2.8.3-1 Severity: grave Unpacking libopenthreads13 (from .../libopenthreads13_2.8.3-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libopenthreads13_2.8.3-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libOpenThreads.so.2.4.0', which is

Bug#578497: FTBS and other issues

Package: openjump Version: 1.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source and other issues. Current version in sid does not more build. Also new versions 1.2+ depend on problematic software such as Sun JAI. My own guess is that currently OpenJump is not more to

Bug#577071: FTBS due to octave error

Package: octave-octcdf Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Currently under cowbuilder: mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/octave-octcdf-1.0.13/debian/octave-octcdf/usr/share/octave/packages/3.2 \

Bug#576969: FTBS: C++ compiler cannot create executables

Package: libmesh Severity: serious libmesh should build-depend on mpi-default-dev. cd libmesh autoconf configure.in:584: warning: AC_REQUIRE: `AC_PROG_F77' was expanded before it was required ../../lib/autoconf/fortran.m4:255: AC_LANG_COMPILER(Fortran 77) is expanded from...

Bug#575212: Cannot upgrade

Package: python-mygpoclient Version: 1.2-1 Severity: grave Setting up python-mygpoclient (1.2-1) ... Compiling /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mygpoclient/json.py ... SyntaxError: ('future feature absolute_import is not defined',) pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (16)

Bug#564689: apt-listbugs fails and prevents apt-get running

Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.2 Severity: grave This what it happens today, after a week-end of missing updates on a laptop of mine: Need to get 39,9kB/162MB of archives. After this operation, 2257kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Get:1

Bug#556653: FTBS on hppa

Package: cmake Version: 2.8.0-1 Severity: serious [...] g++ -g -O2 -I/build/buildd-cmake_2.8.0-1-hppa-6PIkTw/cmake-2.8.0/Build/Bootstrap.cmk -I/build/buildd-cmake_2.8.0-1-hppa-6PIkTw/cmake-2.8.0/Source -I/build/buildd-cmake_2.8.0-1-hppa-6PIkTw/cmake-2.8.0/Build/Bootstrap.cmk cmake.o

Bug#547631: does not work due to Undefined subroutine main::delimiter

Package: lintian Version: 2.2.15 Severity: normal s/delimiter/$Lintian::Output::GLOBAL-delimiter/ at line 696. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386

Bug#546158: FTBS on ppc

Package: emoslib Version: 000370+dfsg-5 Severity: serious Relevant error: make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-emoslib_000370+dfsg-5-powerpc-Qhf2s9/emoslib-000370+dfsg/bufrtables' ./links.sh gfortran -O2 -fdefault-real-8 -fcray-pointer -fno-second-underscore -Dlinux -DREAL_8

Bug#544978: and libgdal1-1.5.0-grass: error when trying to install together

Package: libgdal-grass Severity: normal This is an error due to binNMU, as you can see from the following list: klecker:~/debian/debian-gis/supported/gdal-grass/build-area$ dpkg --contents libgdal1-1.5.0-grass_1.5.4-3_i386.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2009-04-20 12:50 ./ drwxr-xr-x

Bug#539474: dovecot-imapd fails accessing mailbox

Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1:1.2.2-1 Severity: grave Just after upgrading to the new dovecot version I'm not more able to access the default mboxi (not Maildir), it fails with: Aug 1 10:53:15 klecker dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=frankie, method=PLAIN, rip=151.53.252.113,

Bug#536519: Another db error

Package: rpm Version: 4.7.0-8 Severity: serious Setting up rpm (4.7.0-8) ... rpmdb: Program version 4.7 doesn't match environment version 0.128 error: db4 error(-30971) from dbenv-open: DB_VERSION_MISMATCH: Database environment version mismatch error: cannot open Packages index using db3 -

Bug#530643: it fails upgrading

Package: xterm Version: 243-1 Severity: serious Setting up xterm (243-1) ... update-alternatives: error: alternative x-terminal-emulator.1.gz can't be slave of x-terminal-emulator: it is a master alternative. dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation

Bug#529675: Please avoid 1.3.38

Package: swig Version: 1.3.38-1 Severity: grave Python 2.6.1+ (r261:67515, Mar 18 2009, 22:12:06) [GCC 4.3.3] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. from osgeo import gdal Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module File

Bug#524502: missing xchat binary package

Package: xchat Version: 2.8.6-3 Severity: grave The -4 binary package is missing in the new source apparently. xchat: Installed: 2.8.6-3 Candidate: 2.8.6-3 Version table: *** 2.8.6-3 0 990 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Bug#521100: Missing proj-data package renders the proj uninstallable

Package: proj Version: 4.6.1-2 Severity: grave -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale:

Bug#520187: Still pending

Package: ogdi-dfsg Followup-For: Bug #520187 Well, proj update is still pending in NEW, so this upload was a bit optimistic. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')

Bug#487679: Mapserver is not working with gcc 4.3 and optimization turned ON

Package: mapserver Version: 5.0.3-1 Severity: grave Reported as http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2660 -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux

Bug#472804: grass FTBS due to gcc seg fault on ARM

Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2.3-2 Severity: serious See http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=grass;ver=6.2.3-2;arch=arm;stamp=1204569437 [...] make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/grass-6.2.3/display/d.barscale' gcc -I/build/buildd/grass-6.2.3/dist.arm-unknown-linux-gnu/include -Wall

Bug#462525: Missing conflict against 1.4 and it needs a general solution to better manage migrations

Package: gdal Version: 1.5.0-1 Severity: grave apt-get install libgdal1-1.5.0 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libgdal1-1.5.0 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 209 not upgraded.

Bug#446857: can't build qgis on arm

Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2.2-2 Severity: grave See http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=qgis;ver=0.8.1-2;arch=arm;stamp=1192513709 /build/buildd/qgis-0.8.1/src/plugins/grass/qgsgrassedit.cpp: At global scope: /build/buildd/qgis-0.8.1/src/plugins/grass/qgsgrassedit.cpp:1840: internal

Bug#439346: XSS issue

Package: mapserver Severity: grave Tags: security See http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2256 It needs updating to 4.10.3. Patch provided for etch to secteam in the meanwhile. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500,

Bug#393408: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

tags 393408 + pending thanks Package: proftpd Version: 1.3.0-9.1 Severity: serious A cleaned proftpd-dfsg-1.3.0 source is now pending in NEW. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#392117: autodir: FTBFS: /usr/include/linux/auto_fs4.h:66: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '__u32'

reassign 392117 linux-kernel-headers thanks On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:58:36PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: In file included from autodir.c:46: /usr/include/linux/auto_fs4.h:66: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '__u32' -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#391901: Current version causes system freeze on SATA attached cdrom at least

Package: cdparanoia Version: 3.10+debian~pre0-1 Severity: grave cdparanoia freezes my SATA thinkpad laptop (with dvd-rami device) with both 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 kernels. But for rendering the program unusable, the system freeze can cause also serious data loss. This could be some SCSI related

Bug#388647: prepared NMU

On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 11:57:14PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote: Hi Francesco Op za, 30-09-2006 te 09:09 +0200, schreef Francesco Paolo Lovergine: On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:13:28PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote: tag 388647 patch tag 375017 patch usertag 388647 supplied-patch usertag

Bug#388647: prepared NMU

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:13:28PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote: tag 388647 patch tag 375017 patch usertag 388647 supplied-patch usertag 375017 supplied-patch thanks Hi, I have prepared a NMU for these two bugs. As I am no DD I can not do the upload myself, but here is the patch anyway.

Bug#300251: Changin' severity

severity 300251 wishlist tags 300251 + wontfix thanks Sorry but I think scilab needs patching for the following reasons: 1. xaw3d is a fork of Xaw6.1, not a replacement for Xaw7. 2. IF scilab needed a Xaw7 API it should link Xaw7, not Xaw3d which is not basically compatible with that. If not,

Bug#300251: Would you please explain me the sense of this bug?

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=300251 Honest, what's the serious (aka policy violation) of such a thing? But for break quite a good number of programs if implemented, of course. We are not obliged to retain inter-distro compatibility and gratuitously changing the

Bug#300251: Would you please explain me the sense of this bug?

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:23:53PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: Hi Francesco, 2006/8/9, Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=300251 Honest, what's the serious (aka policy violation) of such a thing? But for break quite

Bug#284770: Bug #284770: dbmail: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment

On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Paul J Stevens wrote: (cc Francisco) Julien, I've just released dbmail-2.1.7 and have uploaded i386 and amd64 packages to my deb repo. The packages are lintian clean, and I'm quite happy with their state. All that remains tbd are some debconf

Bug#368060: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#368060: thuban: Thuban was compiled with wx 2.4.4 but wxPython is 2.4.5.0

reassign 368060 python-wxgtk2.4 retitle 368060 wxPython missing thanks On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:43:31PM +0200, Moritz Lennert wrote: Package: thuban Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable fresh install of Thuban: $ apt-get install thuban [...] The

Bug#368587: invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed.

Package: nscd Version: 2.3.6-7 Severity: serious An invoke-rc.d failure prevents package upgrading. You should manage that case in prerm in order to avoid such a problem, or return 0 in case of failure in the init script, as well. Most servers in debian do the last, AFAIK. Feel free to close

Bug#368587: invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed.

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:16:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: klecker:~$ ps -fe|grep nscd frankie 14797 4397 0 12:27 pts/17 00:00:00 grep nscd klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd start Starting Name Service

Bug#368587: invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed.

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:05:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:22:03PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: Sorry, but my point is another: klecker:~$ pgrep start klecker:~$ pgrep nscd 26316 klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd stop Stopping Name

Bug#368301: proftpd binary set trapdoor rpath to /users/frankie

On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:36:03AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: proftpd Version: 1.3.0-7 Severity: grave Tags: security Hello Francesco, proftpd include a trapdoor rpath to /users/frankie/... %chrpath usr/sbin/proftpd usr/sbin/proftpd:

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:45:49AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The true problem is admin inconsistency ;) Unfortunately :::10.0.0.0/24 is a perfectly valid CIDR notation, but IS NOT what a naive user would expect, because IPV6 CIDR

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:29:30AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Huh? It's a IPv6 address, followed by a slash, followed by the number of significant bits in decimal. Just like IPv4. Sorry, that's not what I meant. ::

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

severity 365464 important tags 365464 - security thanks This is more a configuration issue than a true bug. A proper configured system (i.e. full 128bits CIDR) has no problem at all. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

tags 365464 + patch tags 365464 + pending tags 365464 + fixed-upstream thanks An upstream patch is now available to refuse CIDR notation in ipv6 addresses. It seems ok to me to manage the issue. Would you please confirm that, if you are able to patch yourself the package? Else i'll go straight

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: An upstream patch is now available to refuse CIDR notation in ipv6 addresses. It seems ok to me to manage the issue. Would you please confirm that, if you are able to patch yourself the package? Else i'll go straight with

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:18:34PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Francesco Paolo Lovergine: Refusing IPv6 subnets doesn't qualify as a fix for this issue IMHO, but at least it'll fix the hole in the meantime. I wonder how this code can end up in a stable release. I'm not an IPv6

Bug#365464: proftpd: net ACLs are buggy

On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:37:41PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Francesco Paolo Lovergine: According to my notes (I'm offline at the moment), RFC 3513 specifies a syntax for IPv6 prefixes. The syntax is similar to IPv4 prefixes: 0123:4567:89ab:cdef:0123:4567:89ab:cde0/124

Bug#365714: emacs21: FTBFS on most architectures, xaw issues.

On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:36:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 365714 thanks On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:45:22AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: Mmmm, missed closing in changelog. It does not depend on libxaw8-dev now (and on any other X -dev package indeed

Bug#364832: Use --force to dpkg-statoverride

Package: fuse-utils Version: 2.5.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #364832 That's another possible option instead of checking before install the override... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')

Bug#362074: Raising the severity again

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:39:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: tags 362074 + pending thanks Awaiting for the new libxp-dev package, after recent xutils-dev fixing. So stay tuned... While the new libxp-dev

Bug#362845: Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at usr/share/man/man5/ftpusers.5.gz

tags 362845 + fixed-in-experimental thanks That's a consequence of removing the cyclic dependency among proftpd-* packages and proftpd-common. Anyway, that's obsoleted in the experimental package. On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 05:14:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at

Bug#339721: rox: I repeatdly upgraded 2.2 - 2.4 on different boxes

severity 339721 important tags 339721 + unreproducible tags 339721 + moreinfo thanks Package: rox Followup-For: Bug #339721 Without problems. Are you still able to replicate this? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),

Bug#346870: xxgdb status

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:27:54PM +0100, Siward de Groot wrote: On Saturday 14 January 2006 18:40, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: Just a note: I'm perfectly aware of this easy issue. I'll do not upload a new version because while patching for using UNIX98 pts and so squashing all other

Bug#346870: xxgdb status

Just a note: I'm perfectly aware of this easy issue. I'll do not upload a new version because while patching for using UNIX98 pts and so squashing all other reports, I discover a major issue with the I/O Window which causes the program to freeze, also with current version. I would prefer take

Bug#322854: ftp.debian.org: please remove libg++27

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal All libc5 and alt-* gerarchy is gone. Let this package reach his brothers and sisters. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386

Bug#347366: depends on libdps1 which is no more available

Package: kismet Version: 2005.08.R1-1.2 Severity: grave The following packages have unmet dependencies: kismet: Depends: libdps1 ( 4.1.0) but it is not installable E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990,

Bug#339123: it also breaks (c)debootstrap and other programs such as pbuilder

Package: base-config Version: 2.74 Followup-For: Bug #339123 sudo cdebootstrap sid build P: Retrieving Release.gpg P: Retrieving Release P: Parsing Release P: Retrieving Packages.gz P: Validating Packages P: Parsing Packages P: Retrieving libc6 P: Validating libc6 P: Retrieving libgcc1 P:

Bug#337471: tempfile security issue

Package: smb4k Version: 0.5.2 Severity: grave Tags: security See http://smb4k.berlios.de/ and thread already reported to stable secteam. Fixed in 0.6.4 due in a few. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')

Bug#334680: cannot be installed on sid with current udev

Package: synce-serial Version: 0.9.1-2 Severity: grave Please follow udev/hotplug transition. The package depends currently on hotplug, but current udev conflicts with hotplug and hotplug is considered obsolete. Therefore it is not installable on a up-to-date system. -- System Information:

Bug#323358: grass package affected too

Awaiting for transition to be buildable on sid... :-( -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324894: no more installable on sid

Package: kdebase-dev Version: 4:3.3.2-1 Severity: grave Dunno if you are waiting for c++ transition completion, anyway current sid version is not installable. Any reason to not move the experimental one in the sid pool? That's just for notice. -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#319849: Security fix in just released 1.3.0rc2?

tags 319849 + security found 319849 1.2.10-15 thanks done On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:35:39AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du jeudi 18 août 2005, vers 09:18, Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: Shouldn't this bug be tagged security

Bug#319849: Security fix in just released 1.3.0rc2?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:57:27AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du lundi 25 juillet 2005, vers 10:42, Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: I pointed both bugs at the very start of july (or end of june?) to both stable and testing secteams and

Bug#318572: marked as done (amule is no more installable)

On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:08:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 318572 thanks Ok, should go whenever new libwxgtk2.4 will enter sid... No, there won't *be* another libwxgtk2.4 package in sid: libwxgtk2.4 is a C++ library, which means it must be renamed as part of the ABI

Bug#317282: proftpd: no init script

severity 317282 normal tags 317282 + unreproducible tags 317282 + moreinfo thanks Please, do not presume your problem is a general one without verification. Of course it installs perfectly in a fresh install on sarge (just verified to be sure, but it's a quite macroscopic issue to be never

Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server

tags 315687 sid thanks On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:34AM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote: Package: proftpd Version: 1.2.10-17 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole In the most recent (1.2.10-17) version of proftpd, the permissions used by the daemon are somehome mixed up:

Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server

On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:09:31AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:34AM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote: Package: proftpd Version: 1.2.10-17 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole This bug was not reproducable on 1.2.10-16, I had to install

Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server

tags 315687 pending thanks Ok, Murphy's law in action... Feel free to use my repos: http://people.debian.org/debian/sarge/ ./ http://people.debian.org/debian/sid/ ./ ftp-master is moving so no new uploads until again available. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#313435: proftpd: FTBFS

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:04:00AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: Package: proftpd Version: 1.2.10-16 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures. Here's one of the failed build logs:

Bug#311557: appears to be present in 1.9-9 (sid) only

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:01:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Well, this bug is now merged with 262395, but they seem to be opposite sides of the same bugfix; the dependency on efmt is a result of the changes in 1.9-9 that were supposed to fix 262395/306595. I don't really know anything

Bug#309819: possible patch

A possible patch could be the following, but please check against the two archs which give problem... --- endian.h.old2005-05-28 18:03:12.157472224 +0200 +++ endian.h2005-05-28 18:06:03.729389328 +0200 @@ -26,15 +26,7 @@ #ifndef _endian_h_ #define _endian_h_ -#if G_BYTE_ORDER ==

Bug#310577: 'kernel-patch-grsecurity2' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:47:27AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 23:32 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: About that specific patch, the nice thing is that the nude patch applies nicely to debian kernel source, but kernel-patch fails :-? To which debian kernel

Bug#310545: 'kernel-patch-adamantix' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-adamantix Version: 1.7 Severity: grave Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-adamantix does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway

Bug#310542: 'kernel-patch-adamantix' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-adamantix Version: 1.7 Severity: grave Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-adamantix does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway

Bug#310543: 'kernel-patch-adamantix' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-adamantix Version: 1.7 Severity: grave Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-adamantix does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway

Bug#310544: 'kernel-patch-adamantix' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-adamantix Version: 1.7 Severity: grave Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-adamantix does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway

Bug#310558: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt Version: 13 Severity: grave Dear Russell Coker As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with

Bug#310557: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt Version: 13 Severity: grave Dear Russell Coker As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with

Bug#310554: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt Version: 13 Severity: grave Dear Russell Coker As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with

Bug#310551: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt Version: 13 Severity: grave Dear Russell Coker As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with

Bug#310553: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt Version: 13 Severity: grave Dear Russell Coker As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with

Bug#310555: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt Version: 13 Severity: grave Dear Russell Coker As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with

Bug#310562: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt Version: 13 Severity: grave Dear Russell Coker As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with

Bug#310556: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt Version: 13 Severity: grave Dear Russell Coker As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with

Bug#310559: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt Version: 13 Severity: grave Dear Russell Coker As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with

Bug#310561: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt Version: 13 Severity: grave Dear Russell Coker As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with

Bug#310565: 'kernel-patch-cryptoloop' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-cryptoloop Version: 2.4.22.0-25.1 Severity: grave Dear Juergen Strobel (private) As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-cryptoloop does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is

Bug#310564: 'kernel-patch-badram' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

Package: kernel-patch-badram Version: 2.6.5.2-1 Severity: grave Dear Yann Dirson As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, kernel-patch-badram does not apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway useful at least with an

  1   2   >