Bug#1061102: Not related to xsltproc?

tags 1061102 + moreinfo thanks Hi Jonas, Looking at the output of the build log, the problem appears to be this: configure: error: in `/build/biome-1.5.2/target/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/build/tikv-jemalloc-sys-2de43a13417834c8/out/build': configure: error: cannot compute suffix of

Bug#1062437: python-debian: When Files: is a whitespace-separated list, files are matched too eagerly

severity 1062437 important tags 1062437 +confirmed thanks Thanks for the bugreport! I agree that this is an important thing to fix and we're not following the specification in https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep5/ here. I don't think it violates policy 2.3 though; the meaning of the

Bug#1057860: Will do release + upload this weekend

We'll just need to do an upstrema release and an upload for this, the change is already in upstream bzr. I'll do this over the weekend; if I fail to do a release for some reason then I'll ship the patch in Debian. Jelmer

Bug#1051766: lintian-brush: apply-multiarch-hints does not finish

tags 1051766 + confirmed thanks On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:29:31PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > after upgrading to lintian-brush 0.150 apply-multiarch-hints just does > not end and I need to kill the actual xterm (even ^C does not back the > prompt). After killing the xterm it leaves a broken

Bug#1026331: lintian-brush: autopkgtest regression: test_matches_package_version

fixed 1026331 0.145 thanks On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 06:10:30PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: lintian-brush > Version: 0.144 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: regression > > Dear maintainer(s), > > With a recent upload of lintian-brush the autopkgtest of

Bug#979257: RabbitVCS status?

binary package for bookworm. -- Jelmer Vernooij PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc

Bug#732570: Let's remove it

an argument that tla itself should be kept around, to at least allow people to be able to access old repositories and migrate away. -- Jelmer Vernooij PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc

Bug#1015914: Uploaded to DELAYED/10

I've also uploaded a NMU to DELAYED/10, please feel free to cancel or let me know here if you prefer not to see that go through. Jelmer -- Jelmer Vernooij PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc

Bug#1015914: (no subject)

tags 1015914 +patch thanks Hi Paul, Sandro, I've verified that node-clipboard works too, and proposed a PR at https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/sphinx-copybutton/-/merge_requests/2 Cheers, Jelmer

Bug#1022283: marked as pending in python-wikkid

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1022283 in python-wikkid reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1020024: marked as pending in pydoctor

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1020024 in pydoctor reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1013485: marked as pending in python-debian

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1013485 in python-debian reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1012373: marked as pending in dulwich

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1012373 in dulwich reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1002851: xdelta 1.1.3-10.2 merged, nmudiff

gt; -- > Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own. > > Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, > that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter. -- Jelmer Vernooij PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1000716: More details

forwarded 1000716 https://github.com/ponyorm/pony/issues/598 thanks Upstream is working on this. See: https://github.com/ponyorm/pony/commits/py_3_10_dev https://github.com/ponyorm/pony/issues/598

Bug#995410: breezy: FTBFS:

Hi Steve, On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:21:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > While tracking a build failure of breezy 3.2.1 in Ubuntu, I found that it is > currently also reproducible in Debian unstable: Thanks for the bug report. > [...] >

Bug#994223: Processed: retitle 994223 to lintian-brush is unusable

reassign 994223 python3-breezy fixed 994223 3.2.0+bzr7543-1 thanks On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 06:18:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > retitle 994223 lintian-brush is unusable > Bug #994223 [lintian-brush] lintian-brush unusable > Changed Bug title to 'lintian-brush is unusable' from

Bug#988909: Please make sure lintian-brush will migrate to testing (Was: routine-update is marked for autoremoval from testing)

Hi Andreas, Thanks for the pointer - I hadn't realized that this bug was still affecting testing. How hard would it be to drop support for lintian-brush in routine-update in testing? It looks like properly fixing this bug is going to be tricky if it involves going via unstable - it would mean

Bug#988166: (no subject)

severity 988166 normal tags 988166 +upstream thanks I've moved Dulwich from Recommends to Depends for the moment. This will at least work around the issue. Ideally we'd keep dulwich as a recommends, but that will require some investigation and fixes upstream.

Bug#988166: breezy breaks check-manifest autopkgtest: brz: ERROR: No module named 'dulwich'

On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 09:36:30PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > With a recent upload of breezy the autopkgtest of check-manifest fails > in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of > breezy from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from > testing. In tabular form:

Bug#986510: lintian-brush: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:24:38AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I've got a testing-removal warning for routine-update due this bug. I > know you are usually very prompt in replying to issues thus I'm simply > wondering whether you might have missed this bug report. I personally > have never

Bug#972793: marked as pending in hg-git

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #972793 in hg-git reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#972793: Patch attached

breaking the tests, so I'll file a separate (normal severity) bug about that. Tristan, are you happy for me to upload the package with that change? -- Jelmer Vernooij PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc === modified file 'debian/changelog' --- old/debian/changelog 2020-09-24 06:48:41 +

Bug#952536: Drop support for architectures not supported by upstream?

I can see two options here: 1) drop support for architectures not supported by upstream 2) disable the unsupported architecture check somehow * either by setting the environment variable * by patching out the check in the source code I'm not entirely sure what the right thing is for our

Bug#952348: marked as pending in backupchecker

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #952348 in backupchecker reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#952348: marked as pending in backupchecker

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #952348 in backupchecker reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#950470: breezy still fails with one autopkg test on the binary-indep buid

severity 950470 important thanks On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 10:37:41AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > see > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=breezy=all=3.0.2-3=1580478666=0 > > == > ERROR: >

Bug#950321: lintian-brush: test failures with new lintian 2.48.0

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:47:40AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Source: lintian-brush > Version: 0.56 > Severity: serious > > Hello, looks like the new lintian removed one renamed tag in its latest > version: > * Remove data/override/renamed-tags; they are defined in the tag >

Bug#936617: Updated on salsa; pending upload

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 03:50:57AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 3:27 PM Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > > It looks like this package has been ported to Python 3, but has not > > yet been uploaded. The last changelog entry on salsa > > (http

Bug#937484: Info received (Taking over)

a version of the package ported to Python 3, if that would be useful. -- Jelmer Vernooij PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc

Bug#937484: Taking over

Hi Hans-Christoph, I'm interested in pymtp, since gpodder can optionally use it. Thanks for packaging it! I'll prepare an upload to migrate it to Python3, and will move it to the Python team. Cheers, Jelmer -- Jelmer Vernooij PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc

Bug#936617: Updated on salsa; pending upload

: - few bugfixes - added more options - use Python3 -- Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Fri, 06 Dec 2019 15:53:10 +0100 Philippe, would you like me to sponsor an upload of the package? -- Jelmer Vernooij PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#948958: marked as pending in python-pyscss

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #948958 in python-pyscss reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#947904: ledger2beancount autopkgtest failure with new ledger

blocking ledger from migrating to testing. It looks like the last upload (in unstable) doesn't actually migrate Python 3, but just disables Python support altogether. :-( I'll see if I can do an upload that just disables the Python tests for now. Cheers, Jelmer -- Jelmer Vernooij PGP Key:

Bug#938327: Upstream references

FWIW Upstream is working on Python 3 support here: https://github.com/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs/issues/279 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#936454: No longer depends on python-fastimport

severity 936454 normal thanks Resetting this to normal. As of 0.19.14-1 (uploaded at the same time as the python-fastimport removal), Dulwich has stopped build-depending on python-fastimport.

Bug#941008: loggerhead, multiple dependency issues.

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:50:14PM +0100, peter green wrote: > Package: loggerhead > Version: 1.19~bzr479+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > > Loggerhead has multiple dependency issues. > > The loggerhead source package build-depends on python-subunit which is no > longer built by the subunit source

Bug#932584: Epydoc and Pydoctor

Hi Kenneth, Ian, On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 08:45:54PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:46 AM Ian Jackson > wrote: > > > Otherwise, I will see if I can determine how well the package works > > > without epydoc installed. If it works (i.e. doesn't blow up) and I > > >

Bug#930213: Only happens when used with paramiko

severity 930213 normal thanks This only happens when bzr is used with paramiko and if there are SSH agent keys. You should be able to work around this by setting BZR_SSH=openssh in your environment or uninstalling paramiko.

Bug#913037: Bug #913037 in dulwich marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #913037 in dulwich reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#913037: (no subject)

retitle 913037 "test dulwich.tests.test_porcelain.PushTests.test_simple contains race condition" thanks This is not a python3.7-specific issue, but a test that contains a race condition that means it occasionally fails. This is reproducible on other python versions as well (when running the test

Bug#913771: syncthing-gtk: unsatisfiable dependency on non-existent gir-1.2-glib-2.0

Hi Steve, On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 03:16:32PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > The syncthing-gtk package is uninstallable, because it depends on > gir-1.2-glib-2.0, which does not exist. The correct spelling of this > package name is gir1.2-glib-2.0. Please find a patch attached. Argh, that was

Bug#898591: lptools: Intent to remove from Debian

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:25:39PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Source: lptools > Version: 0.2.0-2 > Severity: serious > User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: oldlibs pygtk > Tags: sid buster > X-Debbugs-CC: x...@debian.org, jel...@debian.org > > lptools depends on the

Bug#883743: bzr: FTBFS on armel

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:45:11PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Package: bzr > Version: 2.7.0+bzr6622-9 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > The last armel bzr build failed to build from source, and I've tried to > reproduce the issue unsuccessfully. > > >

Bug#883743: bzr: FTBFS on armel

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:45:11PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > The last armel bzr build failed to build from source, and I've tried to > reproduce the issue unsuccessfully. > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bzr=armel=2.7.0%2Bbzr6622-9=1510195017=0 > > I tried building

Bug#868542: marked as pending

e0eb92b4f51b3ee27a8850ea7e0e651baa14971e Author: Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@jelmer.uk> Date: Mon Jul 24 23:51:11 2017 + Stop shipping pypy C extensions in python-dulwich. Closes: #868542 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 4084039..4840a64 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/

Bug#834654: Test failures

I've uploaded a new Debian version to unstable packaging RC1. Unfortunately there are a test failures on various architectures. :( Note that not all of these are release architectures, and that make bails out once tests in one directory fail. Builders are still running, but so far I've seen:

Bug#834654: 7.0.1

A brief update on this: a RC release has happened upstream, which is versioned "7.0.1". A stable release (which will be "7.1") is in the works, but may not make it before stretch. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#847634: irssi-plugin-quassel: libquassel_core.so not in expected location

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 05:08:00AM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Package: irssi-plugin-quassel > Version: 0~git20160612-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I followed the instructions from the README.md on github, but when I got > to the '/load quassel' part I got

Bug#845335: bzr issue

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 05:47:52PM +, Ben Dooks wrote: > The "bzr: ERROR: exceptions.TypeError: first argument must be string or > compiled pattern" is still there after updating. > > bzr is already the newest version (2.7.0+bzr6619-1). This has been fixed. The latest version of bzr

Bug#820965: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#820965: marked as pending

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:51:14AM +0300, Vlad Orlov wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to know if there's any progress on uploading the new > version to jessie-security. Just want to check if the update > would fix https://bugs.debian.org/831851 as well. See

Bug#820965: marked as pending

d4092f0849e2ec1c92214da90d052c7947913d19 Author: Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@jelmer.uk> Date: Sun Sep 4 14:21:37 2016 + New upstream release. diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 91abc96..711b647 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +samba (2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u1) UNRE

Bug#820965: marked as pending

d29a694496549410931c88fccb18961399203c93 Author: Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@jelmer.uk> Date: Sun Sep 4 14:21:37 2016 + New upstream release. diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 91abc96..8374733 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +samba (2:4.2.12+dfsg-0+deb8u1) UNRE

Bug#812264: marked as pending

e23b11c3bccb7e463ffb51c86f3321cca63d57a9 Author: Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@jelmer.uk> Date: Mon Jul 4 12:23:25 2016 + Add patch gcc_6.patch, fixing compatibility with gcc 6. Closes: #812264 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 02eaf36..06b215c 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3

Bug#821070: marked as pending

fcb793364de9bda9fae4a05476cf414f46126bc5 Author: Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@jelmer.uk> Date: Sat Apr 16 00:19:06 2016 + Bump version in Replaces: samba-libs for samba-vfs-modules to 4.3.2+dfsg-1, to fix jessie->stretch upgrades. Closes: #821070 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 9b028f9..c1706

Bug#815331: Still reproducible?

severity 815331 important tags 815331 +moreinfo thanks Can you still reproduce this with current pypy? It doesn't segfault for me. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#814539: [Pkg-bazaar-maint] Bug#814539: bzrtools: Uninstallable with current sid bzr and python-bzrlib (2.7.0-2)

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 09:34:03PM +0100, Vincent Ladeuil wrote: > > Agustin Martin writes: > > > Package: bzrtools > > Version: 2.6.0-2 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: uninstallable in sid > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > Seems that

Bug#812398: openldap: FTBFS: can't read /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.la

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 11:44:53AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Ryan Tandy writes: > > > Since the .la files moved from /usr/lib/$arch to /usr/lib/$arch/heimdal, > > looks like their contents also need to be updated. > > According to debian/changelog I deleted the *.la files in

Bug#812398: openldap: FTBFS: can't read /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.la

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 11:44:53AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Ryan Tandy writes: > > > Since the .la files moved from /usr/lib/$arch to /usr/lib/$arch/heimdal, > > looks like their contents also need to be updated. > > According to debian/changelog I deleted the *.la files in

Bug#808769: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#808769: LDB build failure isn't a regression

On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:38:12AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 18:53 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > Just a quick note to say that the LDB build failure isn't a > > regression > > - whatever is going on here has always been going on, it just wasn't > > tested before

Bug#808769: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#808769: LDB build failure isn't a regression

On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 09:51:34PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:38:12AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 18:53 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > Just a quick note to say that the LDB build failure isn't a > > > r

Bug#808769: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#808769: Bug#808769: Bug#808769: LDB build failure isn't a regression

On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:36:18AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 22:22 +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:00:44AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 21:51 +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > > On S

Bug#808769: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#808769: Bug#808769: LDB build failure isn't a regression

On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:00:44AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 21:51 +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:38:12AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 18:53 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > >