Bug#768670: ruby-moneta: FTBFS in jessie: build-dependency not installable: ruby-activesupport-3.2 (= 3.2.11~)

2014-11-09 Thread Joshua Timberman
Unfortunately, I don't have cycles to maintain the ruby-moneta package, and we're not actually using moneta in chef (the original reason for the packaging). What do I need to do to transfer the package to another maintainer?

Bug#697895: Update libextlib-ruby / ruby-extlib for vulnerabilities (Re: CVE-2013-0156)

2013-01-13 Thread Joshua Timberman
Thank you, Salvatore and Cédric, for your help and quick turnaround with this! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#604231: chef-solr

2010-11-29 Thread Joshua Timberman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! We (Opscode, upstream maintainers of Chef) are fine with removal of the following chef packages from Debian Squeeze: chef-server chef-server-api chef-server-webui chef-solr The client packages should remain, and should be updated to the

Bug#596351: Error appears to be in JSON library, not ohai

2010-11-14 Thread Joshua Timberman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The error appears to be with json, not with ohai. With the version 1.1.9 libjson-ruby package installed: irb(main):001:0 l=\370 = \370 irb(main):002:0 require 'json' = true irb(main):003:0 l.to_json JSON::GeneratorError: partial character in source,

Bug#596351: ohai is required for Chef

2010-11-13 Thread Joshua Timberman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Chris! Ohai is required for Chef. Is this a localization issue that can be fixed upstream in Ohai? Or is it in fact a bug in older version of JSON available in Debian? This is the first I've heard of the issue with Ohai. -BEGIN PGP

Bug#588125: [DRE-maint] Bug#588125: Rubygems 1.3.7 broken with Ruby 1.9.2 in Debian -- help needed

2010-08-29 Thread Joshua Timberman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! On Aug 28, 2010, at 12:56 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: - Do we want to make the installation of rubygems optional with 1.9.1? (as a separate package ?) That would probably be the right thing to do since I think that we should make the use

Bug#575067: [DRE-maint] Bug#575067: Anyone working on this ohai bug?

2010-03-26 Thread Joshua Timberman
directly w/o running the ruby command, see: http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/OHAI-172 - -- Opscode, Inc Joshua Timberman, Senior Solutions Engineer C: 720.334.RUBY E: jos...@opscode.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin

Bug#574142: copyright file updated for Merb

2010-03-17 Thread Joshua Timberman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Packaging updated, see changelog: http://github.com/opscode/opscode-packages/tree/master/debian/merb/debian Cc tfheen for upload sponsorship. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)

Bug#574142: [DRE-maint] Bug#574142: merb non-DSFG

2010-03-17 Thread Joshua Timberman
repository. It appears you've done the work on the package in the past, do you have access to commit to the svn repository? I do have access to commit to the SVN repository. I had added a new sub-package, merb-param-protection, in the Git repo I'm using. - -- Opscode, Inc Joshua Timberman, Senior