Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

On 20 Feb 2019, at 22:19, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:31:17AM +, Kevin Smith wrote: >> On 27 Dec 2018, at 22:52, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:41:47PM +, Kevin Smith wrote: >>>> A

Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

On 27 Dec 2018, at 22:52, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:41:47PM +, Kevin Smith wrote: >> Apologies, I’d forgotten that we’d prepared an update from upstream and not >> gotten it submitted. We’ll try to address this in the next week or so. >

Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

Apologies, I’d forgotten that we’d prepared an update from upstream and not gotten it submitted. We’ll try to address this in the next week or so. /K > On 6 Dec 2018, at 21:55, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Source: swift-im > Severity: serious > > Should swift-im be removed? > - No upload

Bug#844879: (no subject)

; > Be as it may, it needs to be uploaded to Debian as well. > You'd need to get somebody prepare an updated package and look for > sponsorship, like Kevin Smith did for 3.0.4-1 last year. Swift 4.0’s in (hopefully) final RC at the moment, so I expect to be sorting out a package for that shortly. /K

Bug#825704: swift-im: should it be removed from Debian?

On 14 Jul 2016, at 08:50, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 05:23:48AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:17:32PM +0100, Kevin Smith wrote: >>> Thanks very much - I’ve had something I think’s ready to go

Bug#825704: swift-im: should it be removed from Debian?

On 16 Jun 2016, at 18:07, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:35:48PM +0100, Olly Betts wrote: >> The DEP-5 machine readable copyright is optional - from the spec: >> >>"Use of this specification is optional." >> >>

Bug#825704: swift-im: should it be removed from Debian?

On 12 Jun 2016, at 22:09, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: > > On 12 Jun 2016, at 22:06, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 09:49:21PM +0100, Kevin Smith wrote: >>> Next step is working out why uic reports that it “coul

Bug#825704: swift-im: should it be removed from Debian?

On 12 Jun 2016, at 22:06, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 09:49:21PM +0100, Kevin Smith wrote: >> Next step is working out why uic reports that it “could not find a Qt >> installation of ‘’”. I’ll keep at it. > > If you share

Bug#825704: swift-im: should it be removed from Debian?

On 12 Jun 2016, at 18:27, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Kevin Smith wrote: >> My current issue is working out how to remove a dev dependency on the >> qt5-default metapackage and still have it compile. > >

Bug#825704: swift-im: should it be removed from Debian?

On 12 Jun 2016, at 16:43, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:21:52PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 09:49:59AM +0100, Kevin Smith wrote: >>> There’s a new package in the process of being uploaded. The versio

Bug#825704: swift-im: should it be removed from Debian?

There’s a new package in the process of being uploaded. The version I produced a few days ago accidentally used an old lint profile, but I’ll fix that imminently. /K > On 29 May 2016, at 00:27, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Source: swift-im > Version: 2.0+dev6-1 > Severity:

Bug#674504: About debian bugs #674504

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Mehdi Abaakouk sil...@sileht.net wrote: Hi swift-im maintainers, You have recently uploaded a new package swift-im and introduced a small issue, but unfortunately marked as serious and RC by debian policy bots. So, to quickly solve this issue, we need to

Bug#355356: subversion depends on libneon24 but this package doesn't exist in unstable, only libneon25 exists. So I can't install subversion.

Package: subversionSeverity: critical *** Please type your report below this line ***cookooland:/usr/src/madwifi-ng-r1460-20060304# apt-get install subversionReading package lists... DoneBuilding dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you haverequested an