> I think both are wrong but both do the job.
Yes, I think also, but that’s not something I can do.
This "fix" works fine so far, but yeah, upstream should fix it.
> Now, the question is: do we need to fix this for bullseye?
> It smells like there's no need to, no?
No, not that I think off,
I can confirm the patch works.
I've tested on a Debian Bullseye build with
cifs-utils 7.0 from https://ftp.samba.org/pub/linux-cifs/cifs-utils/
I refreshed patch 001.
Added the patch shown buy Helmut.
And I builded against Debian Bullseye with parallel=7 and parallel=1
Only I can't
Hai,
If people want a temporary fix for this one.
Add my repo for 4.10 (builded for buster)
wget -O - http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc | apt-key add
-
echo "deb http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba410 main contrib
non-free" | sudo tee -a
3 matches
Mail list logo
