https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9417
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 0.43
Severity: critical
Tags: security upstream
Justification: root security hole
Dear Maintainer,
CVE-2017-8386 "BroadPwn" has been around for a while.
It seems Debian ships the relevant firmware in this package.
Could I impose on you to ensure that all is
kanae:~# aptitude -vV upgrade
W: The upgrade command is deprecated; use safe-upgrade instead.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
The
Hi folks,
Get:55 http://http.us.debian.org sid/main proj-data 4.6.1-3 [2925kB]
Get:56 http://http.us.debian.org sid/main proj 4.6.1-3 [20.3kB]
Get:57 http://http.us.debian.org sid/main libproj0 4.6.1-3 [134kB]
Get:58 http://http.us.debian.org sid/main proj-bin 4.6.1-3 [57.5kB]
Get:59
Sadly the workaround
dpkg-reconfigure nspluginwrapper
update-alternatives --auto flash-mozilla.so
hasn't changed anything for me.
The outputs of Bart's tests remain the same.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bart Martens wrote:
update-alternatives --list flash-mozilla.so|xargs dpkg -S
kanae:~# l /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 74312 2008-09-04 12:47
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
kanae:~#
--
To
Bart Martens wrote:
Could you send me the output of these commands please ?
kanae:~# dpkg -l|grep -i flash
ii flashplugin-nonfree 1:1.7.2 Adobe
Flash Player - browser plugin
ii kwordquiz4:3.5.9-2
AMD32:
Testing 1.7.1+1.63 was successful while my impression was that this was broken
a day or two back. I could easily be thinking of 1.7.1 plain.
Upgrading to 1.7.2 restored the You need to upgrade your flash player message.
AMD64:
In the interim I have upgraded mobo/processor/ram and
The workaround doesn't work for me as 15 is required by evince and imagemagick,
which kde would much prefer remained.
# dpkg -P libdjvulibre15
dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of libdjvulibre15:
libmagick10 depends on libdjvulibre15 (= 3.5.20).
evince depends on libdjvulibre15 (=
Does moving /var/lib/apt/listchanges.db work-around this ?
(too late for me to check, already reinstalled)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ gosmore
gosmore: error while loading shared libraries: libgps.so.15: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
$ man gosmore
No manual entry for gosmore
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages are not available.
$ls -al /usr/lib/libgps*
# ls -al /usr/lib/libgps*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude
aptitude: error while loading shared libraries: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.11:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# find / -name libapt-pkg-libc*
/usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.5-6.so.4.4.0
/usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.5-6.so.4.4
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.88
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
...
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.88) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-4-k7
ERROR lilo fails for new /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-4-k7:
Added 2.6.18-4-k7 *
Fatal: open
sadly 2.0 is now in testing which means that the workaround above no longer
works.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but the workaround is giving me grief.
I've can reproducibly revert to 1.5 but all attempts to then follow the steps
to install 2.0 through up a popup saying something to the effect that another
version of icedove is running, kill it or restart your system. There's nothing
to kill, a new x
Package: joe
Version: 3.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
alt/x enter segfault(loss of data)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
python-central 0.4.13 which propagated into today's unstable updates appears to
have fixed this problem.
Thanks
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
python-central 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 arrived in this morning's unstable updates but
the problem remains:
Setting up python (2.3.5-7) ...
Setting up python2.3-dev (2.3.5-13) ...
Setting up python-parallel (0.2-3) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/py_compilefiles, line 103, in
piwakawaka:~# dpkg -l python2.* | grep -v '[pu]n '
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
FYI Tiger threw up these warnings too:
NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/dh_pycentral' does not belong to
any package.
NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/py_compilefiles' does not belong
to any package.
NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/pycentral' does not
I can confirm this bug.
# aptitude -vV upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
fftw3 [3.0.1-14 - 3.1.1-1]
0 packages
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg-3
Followup-For: Bug #344401
My system seems to be similar to those of people seeing this behaviour, but
I am instead seeing a message to the effect of All printing disabled,
Debian bug ... pop up very briefly on pressing the print button.
The printer then
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/qgis_0.7.4-1_i386.deb
(--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/qgis/georefplugin.so', which is also
in package qgis-plugin-georeferencing
piwakawaka:~# aptitude install qgis
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Thank you Michal,
I can confirm that scsi: unknown opcode 0x01 appears in my dmesg.
The error message output was provided as requested.
My naievete meant that I couldn't tell which of the many error messages
in the output were significant. My instinct was that the one about
suid not being set
see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328704
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,
Today's update runs update-fonts-dir on /usr/lib/X11/fonts/truetype
This throws up
warning: /usr/lib/X11/fonts/truetype does not exist or is not a directory
during the upgrade process.
My system does have a /usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType
The really scary thing is that this
26 matches
Mail list logo
