Bug#743633: lnav: FTBFS on sparc

2014-04-04 Thread Patrick Baggett
The log shows 7 failed tests, but I only see this one as actually failing: ../test-driver: line 95: 4705 Bus error $@ $log_file 21 I'm sure I'm not reading this properly -- where are the other 6 failing tests? A bus error on sparc isn't uncommon, but usually it affects many RISC

Bug#691576: GDB still broken with 3.11.10-1

2013-12-12 Thread Patrick Baggett
I kind of wonder if it has anything to do with compiler code generation; I don't remember if you checked whether -O[0,1,2,3] on the kernel changed anything. The appearance is so random, but when it does appear, it's stuck for that version (i.e. not just a race issue that is hard to repro).

Bug#711107: gtk+3.0: FTBFS on ia64 and mips

2013-06-15 Thread Patrick Baggett
Nice job! On Jun 15, 2013 9:44 AM, Stephan Schreiber i...@fs-driver.org wrote: tags 711107 - help tags 711107 + patch thanks Emilio Pozuelo Monfortpo...@debian.org wrote: What happens if you do `make check' or `fakeroot make check' again? make check will set Xvfb differently than

Bug#711107: gtk+3.0: FTBFS on ia64 and mips

2013-06-13 Thread Patrick Baggett
, but running it afterwards fails, I'd love to know. I can say that whatever the original problem (assertion failure in children.c) was, I didn't seem to run into it. Patrick On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.orgwrote: On 12/06/13 16:48, Patrick Baggett wrote: Hi

Bug#711107: gtk+3.0: FTBFS on ia64 and mips

2013-06-12 Thread Patrick Baggett
Hi Emilio, I have an ia64 box with local graphics adapter and working X server. Pardon the newbie question -- do I use apt-get to pull the source and then build it using make test or some other procedure? Patrick On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.orgwrote:

Bug#593141: Bug#653582: ruby-hpricot: FTBFS on ia64: ruby crashes while running tests

2012-12-06 Thread Patrick Baggett
What is broken about it? Has anyone estimated how much effort it would take to fix? Are we talking needing assembly language bindings or just some dumb SIGBUS error? Patrick Baggett On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org wrote: Michael Stapelberg dijo [Thu, Dec 06, 2012

Bug#653653: nbd: FTBFS on sparc: Bus error (core dumped) - FAIL: integrity

2012-03-03 Thread Patrick Baggett
According to g_int64_equal documentation, it expects its arguments to be pointers to gint64 values, which on sparc must be aligned on an 8-byte boundary. Looks like this is intentional, because nbd-tester-client.c creates its hash table like that: That's odd that it would be 4-byte

Bug#653653: nbd: FTBFS on sparc: Bus error (core dumped) - FAIL: integrity

2012-03-03 Thread Patrick Baggett
Where can I read the source for nbd-tester-client.c? I just did a quick scan of ghash.c but I didn't see anything really silly going on, so I'd like to check this file. All copies I can find of nbd-tester-client.c seem to be short (600 lines) and not use glib at all. Patrick On Sat, Mar 3, 2012

Bug#653653: nbd: FTBFS on sparc: Bus error (core dumped) - FAIL: integrity

2012-03-03 Thread Patrick Baggett
as well since it seems to be called in that context. Patrick On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 09:55:51 -0600, Patrick Baggett wrote: Where can I read the source for nbd-tester-client.c? I just did a quick scan of ghash.c but I