Bug#1037541: libguestfs: FTBFS: supermin: error: lstat: Value too large for defined data type: /var/tmp/supermin2b73c8.tmpdir/base.d/init

2023-06-14 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
[https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037541] I think what's happening here is we are using the 31/32 bit lstat functions in OCaml: https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/3d50c168062e9fdbacf739a73738b10108ff3628/otherlibs/unix/unix.mli#L500 (I guess st_size which is signed 31 bits

Bug#1002986: libguestfs-tools: Depends on guestfs-tools that is not in the archive

2022-01-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
> It looks like libguestfs-tools version 1:1.46.2-1 in depending on > guestfs-tools that is not in the archive making the package > uninstalable Just wanted to note that upstream we have split up the old, very large, libguestfs git "monorepo", splitting out: guestfs-tools

Bug#972241: FTBFS on amd64 and i386 (error: guestfs_launch failed)

2020-10-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
guestfsd: error while loading shared libraries: libtirpc.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Did something change with how libtirpc gets packaged on Debian or upstream? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my

Bug#967099: libguestfs: FTBFS: dwz: debian/guestfsd/usr/sbin/guestfsd: DWARF version 0 unhandled

2020-08-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
This is actually a bug in binutils, not OCaml. The fix is: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=4d8ee860737005517be588f4771c358593fa421c See also: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3YRZ5TJK7PTYDYHUDOYC5HFWKZPA7KIJ/

Bug#888182: qemu-system-arm: qemu-system-arm crashes when run as part of the nbdkit testsuite

2018-01-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I was able to reproduce a crashing bug in qemu-system-arm on armv7 host. I'm _not_ going to claim this is the same bug that Debian is seeing, but it might be. It's deep inside TCG and unfortunately there is not a lot of useful information in the stack trace. However it's clearly a bug in qemu.

Bug#888182: qemu-system-arm: qemu-system-arm crashes when run as part of the nbdkit testsuite

2018-01-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
The test failure looks like a problem in libguestfs (or maybe qemu) rather than nbdkit. TBH in Fedora we disable nbdkit tests on 32-bit armv7, 32-bit i686 and all POWER: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nbdkit/blob/44518f07e0b28a799fa683f1f5ec2ca9c000ac01/f/nbdkit.spec#_419 Now that's not

Bug#887969: nbdkit FTBFS: test failures

2018-01-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On the face of it, it looks like the following patch should fix it: https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit/commit/a6b907e5359a139404cee5fd5c7f94eab36a5fde What I don't understand is why that isn't included in your nbdkit (1.1.25) already? In any case the latest nbdkit -- 1.1.27 released a

Bug#849597: libguestfs0: Missing multiple dependencies

2016-12-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
In Fedora we package up the icoutils dependencies in a separate subpackage to avoid pulling in all of X and Perl when installing the main library: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libguestfs.git/tree/libguestfs.spec#n427 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat

Bug#815409: libguestfs: FTBFS on mips: segfault while creating blank-disk-1s.qcow2

2016-02-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I actually have libguestfs running on mipsel at home. It's very slow indeed :-( Anyway, it looks as if the segfault is happening in the `qemu-img' utility. The command which fails is: qemu-img create -f qcow2 -o preallocation=metadata blank-disk-1s.qcow2 512 (You could just run that command

Bug#794732: libguestfs: FTBFS

2015-08-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
It seems to be the same as this Ubuntu bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ocaml-gettext/+bug/1481994 Rich. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#763741: libguestfs: Incorrect build-dependencies (libsystemd-id128-0, libsystemd-journal0), fails binNMU

2014-10-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:44:00PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: Hello Rich. On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 01:59:46PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: libaugeas0, libcap2, libhivex0, libpcre3, libxml2, libyajl2, Why are these wrong? They all seem to be correct build

Bug#763741: libguestfs: Incorrect build-dependencies (libsystemd-id128-0, libsystemd-journal0), fails binNMU

2014-10-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
libaugeas0, libcap2, libhivex0, libpcre3, libxml2, libyajl2, Why are these wrong? They all seem to be correct build deps to me. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com

Bug#763741: libguestfs: Incorrect build-dependencies (libsystemd-id128-0, libsystemd-journal0), fails binNMU

2014-10-03 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I'm not complete clear on what change is being made to Debian. However from the build log, the problem is that 'libsystemd.so.0' isn't making it into the appliance. This seems to be because the following upstream commit shoud be backported to the 1.26 branch (either in Debian or upstream):

Bug#754614: libguestfs: FTBFS on i386: Value too large for defined data type

2014-07-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
This is a bug in mke2fs, not in libguestfs. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099892 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual

Bug#754615: libguestfs: FTBFS on mips: make[2]: *** [quickcheck] Alarm clock

2014-07-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I'm slightly surprised that libguestfs ever worked on MIPS. We've certainly never tested it upstream. The error is a hang in the appliance, which eventually causes libguestfs-test-tool to hit its default timeout (600 seconds). It's not really possible to tell what is causing the hang. We'd

Bug#742283: supermin: internal error: assertion failed at dpkg.ml, line 86, char 19

2014-03-27 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I am able to reproduce this bug with supermin 5.1.5 by doing: $ sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install attr:i386 $ sudo apt-get install xfsprogs (Note that xfsprogs requires attr.) After that: $ dpkg-query --show --showformat '${Package} ${Version}

Bug#576250: febootstrap: segfaults and fails to complete bootstrapping

2010-06-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 03:04:26AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote: Anyway, a new upstream release will be appreciated. If you don't mind, I could upload a NMU if needed. Yes please. The version in Debian is ancient. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat

Bug#576250: febootstrap: segfaults and fails to complete bootstrapping

2010-06-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:45:02AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote: Hi, I have uploaded febootstrap 2.7-1 to Debian. Unfortunately, this version still segfault: Complete! /usr/bin/fakeroot: line 1: 17946 Segmentation fault exit $RESULT These segfaults are almost certainly caused by glibc

Bug#576250: I get the same with both fedora-10 and fedora-12.

2010-04-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:39:00PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Hi, I ran the commands (also tried with fedora-12 with same result): mkdir fed10-64 febootstrap fedora-10 fed10-64 http://mirror/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os Which package is this?

Bug#576250: I get the same with both fedora-10 and fedora-12.

2010-04-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:17:16PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Which package is this? ii febootstrap 2.1-4tool for bootstrapping a Fedora system (like Debian debootstrap) This is kind of old, I really need to update this to the latest version. So why is febootstrap even