Bug#1028674: closing 1028674

2023-01-22 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
fixed -1 6.1um2 close 1028674 thanks -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." "आव्श्यक्ता आविष्कार की जननी है"

Bug#1022742: multipath-tools: CVE-2022-41973 CVE-2022-41974

2022-11-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
I won't be able to attend to it in time, for personal reasons. Let's hope somebody beats me before I'm back s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, 01:51 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: multipath-tools > Version: 0.9.0-4 > Severity: grave > Tags: security upstream >

Bug#1010307: closing 1010307

2022-05-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
# UML version 5.17.3 has already been uploaded close 1010307 thanks -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." "आव्श्यक्ता आविष्कार की जननी है"

Bug#1010307: user-mode-linux: FTBFS in bookworm as it Build-Depends on removed linux-source-5.16"

2022-05-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
linux-source instead, such that you don't need to update the BD every > time the linux kernel updates? This was uploaded this week on Monday. Thank you for mentioning about the linux-source package. I wasn't aware of it. I'll try to see if that fits the build requirements. -- Ritesh Ra

Bug#1008811: Won't start without python3-dbus (misses dependency)

2022-04-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ging repository and will be part of the next upload. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#989665: user-mode-linux FTBFS: link error

2021-06-10 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
1]: *** [Makefile:1167: vmlinux] Error 1 Thanks for the bug report Adrian. I hope to prepare an upload to Unstable soon. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#987568: open-iscsi-udeb: uninstallable udeb: non-udeb dependencies

2021-05-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 17:37 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf (2021-05-15): > > Yes. That scsi-modules support bites back now. I just forgot about > > it > > completely. My intent was to not duplicate another architecture > > list > in > > d/rul

Bug#987568: open-iscsi-udeb: uninstallable udeb: non-udeb dependencies

2021-05-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ment to support/test it, nor the necessary hands-on knowledge if a bug is reported. But derivatives may have a dependency on it. The current easy fix, as Cyril mentioned above, it to revert it back to the previous architecture list and adapt the same in d/rules in target override_dh_makeshlibs. -

Bug#987568: open-iscsi-udeb: uninstallable udeb: non-udeb dependencies

2021-05-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
package (udeb) used by debian-installer. 19:33 ♒ ॐ ♅ ♄ ⛢ ☺  On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 04:32 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Ritesh Raj Sarraf (2021-04-30): > > The upload I prepped failed on some of the architectures. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.

Bug#988328: [pkg-go] Bug#988328: golang-github-pquerna-cachecontrol: FTBFS in tests constant 9223372036854775807 overflows int

2021-05-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
all architectures. So IMO this bug should be downgraded (I'm not > going > to make the downgrade myself though because I'm not the maintainer) I think it is a valid reason to lower the severity. Thanks for pointing it out. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The

Bug#988328: golang-github-pquerna-cachecontrol: FTBFS in tests constant 9223372036854775807 overflows int

2021-05-10 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: golang-github-pquerna-cachecontrol Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source User: de...@lists.apertis.org Usertags: apertis-ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: de...@lists.apertis.org Dear Maintainer, Not sure if this package had built successfully in the past or not.

Bug#988102: python-libnacl: failing in tests on 32 bit systems

2021-05-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: python-libnacl Version: 1.7.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source User: de...@lists.apertis.org Usertags: apertis-ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: de...@lists.apertis.org Dear Maintainer, Your package fails to build, so far on 32 bit systems. It is failing in

Bug#988101: golang-testify: failing tests on armhf

2021-05-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: golang-testify Version: 1.6.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source User: de...@lists.apertis.org Usertags: apertis-ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: de...@lists.apertis.org Dear Maintainer, While preparing the pacakge for a derivative distribution, I have come to

Bug#987568: open-iscsi-udeb: uninstallable udeb: non-udeb dependencies

2021-04-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 21:20 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > How would you like to see this fixed Cyril ? > > The easiest option, if d-i supports, would be to extend architecture > list to: `linux-any`, keeping it in line with what the actual open- > iscsi package supports.

Bug#987568: open-iscsi-udeb: uninstallable udeb: non-udeb dependencies

2021-04-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
to: `linux-any`, keeping it in line with what the actual open- iscsi package supports. On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 13:36 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Thank you. I find your reworded comment proper and have applied the > same. > > I will now work with the release team. >

Bug#987568: open-iscsi-udeb: uninstallable udeb: non-udeb dependencies

2021-04-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
applied the same. I will now work with the release team. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#987568: open-iscsi-udeb: uninstallable udeb: non-udeb dependencies

2021-04-28 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
0 iSCSI. . This is the minimal package (udeb) used by debian-installer. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System From b98d26b860ef7c989438d2641eaa5d2c514d2b51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf Date: Wed, 28 Apr

Bug#987568: open-iscsi-udeb: uninstallable udeb: non-udeb dependencies

2021-04-28 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
then I can prepare an upload just dropping these. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#983379: [PATCH] um: mark all kernel symbols as local

2021-03-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hi, Just a follow-up question on this fix. Is it something that is a candidate for linux-stable ? Thanks, Ritesh On Sat, 2021-03-06 at 16:21 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > Marking all the symbols as local seems correct, and does seem > > > to address the issue, s

Bug#983379: [PATCH] um: mark all kernel symbols as local

2021-03-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
th some kind of > > empty version, and that's different from the default. > > > > Explicitly marking them with a version breaks kallsyms, so that > > doesn't seem to be possible. > > > > Marking all the symbols as local seems correct, and does seem > > to addre

Bug#983379: linux uml segfault

2021-03-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
HI Anton, On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 09:30 +, Anton Ivanov wrote: > > > > > OTOH, I have one more user (other than you) who's not been able to > > reproduce the issue. > > > > > I will do a dissect the moment I figure out how to reproduce it. > > > I > > > will try to do some more experiments

Bug#983379: linux uml segfault

2021-03-02 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
000604a58d0 in start_idle_thread (stack=0x60c28000 , switch_buf=0x60c31e08 ) at arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c:598 #50 0x60004a3d in start_uml () at arch/um/kernel/skas/process.c:45 #51 0x600047b2 in linux_main (argc=1624806843, argv=0x40709000) at arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c:334 #52

Bug#983379: linux uml segfault

2021-03-02 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
06088ff65 in bucket_table_alloc.isra () #19 0x60890740 in rhashtable_init () #20 0x607efaa2 in ipc_init_ids () #21 0x600153c9 in sem_init () ``` So the best I can extract for you is to compile the kernel with as much information as possible. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://peop

Bug#983379: linux uml segfault

2021-03-02 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
h this issue ? I do have the core dump available on my local machine. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#981846: closed by Graham Inggs (python-argcomplete: multiple tests failure)

2021-03-01 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
this upload indeed fixes the failures. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#981846: python-argcomplete: multiple tests failure

2021-02-25 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: python-argcomplete Version: 1.8.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #981846 Control: reopen -1 The issue is not fixed in the latest NMU, i.e. 1.8.1-1.4 Attached is full build log -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (990,

Bug#983379: linux uml segfault

2021-02-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
gt; Did you mean 5.10, 5.2 and 4.19 (UML) guests ? We've seen this happen on Debian Testing and Unstable Host (of which the former would soon be the next stable i.e. Debian Bullseye). In our tests, when running the same linux uml binary (5.10) on a Debian Stable Host, it is working fine. -- Ri

Bug#982974: FTBFS: fails to compile translation files

2021-02-19 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ld like to get > into bullseye.  It is currently blocked by #979609 [1]. Oh! Great. I did see the new version and the bug report against it. I wasn't sure if it would be targeted for Bullseye. Now that you have confirmed, I'll wait for it to be fixed, built and transitioned to Testing. -- Rites

Bug#981718: haskell-basement: diff for NMU version 0.0.11-1.1

2021-02-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-maintainer upload. + * Explicitly set LANG to utf8 to workaround a build bug (Closes: #981718) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:48:15 +0530 + haskell-basement (0.0.11-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release diff -Nru haskell-basement-0.0.11/debian/rules haskell-basement

Bug#982974: FTBFS: fails to compile translation files

2021-02-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: swt4-gtk Version: 4.17.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, During a rebuild of the package on a Bullseye based derivate, it is found that the package fails to build. From the build failure log,

Bug#982973: qtmultimedia-opensource-src: FTBFS in test: tst_QVideoFrame::image(64x64 NV12) Received a fatal error

2021-02-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: qtmultimedia-opensource-src Version: 5.15.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, During a rebuild of the package on a Bullseye derivative, it was seen that the package fails to build from source.

Bug#982969: emacs: expects working network in tests

2021-02-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: emacs Version: 1:27.1+1-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, During a rebuild of the package on a Bullseye derivative, it is seen that the package fails to build from source. It is failing in the tests, where it seeks to access the internet, which by policy is disabled in

Bug#981850: [DRE-maint] Bug#981850: Failed: rspec-core, rspec-support

2021-02-10 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Dear Antonio, On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 23:02 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > I can reproduce a test failure with a non-UTF-8 locale, is that the > > case? > > Probably. Because I'm getting a similar case for some Haskell > packages > and so far the hint has been

Bug#981850: [DRE-maint] Bug#981850: Failed: rspec-core, rspec-support

2021-02-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ild. > I can reproduce a test failure with a non-UTF-8 locale, is that the > case? Probably. Because I'm getting a similar case for some Haskell packages and so far the hint has been that it could be because of the non-utf8 locale. But I'm yet to confirm that. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Ra

Bug#981850: Failed: rspec-core, rspec-support

2021-02-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: ruby-rspec Version: 3.9.0c2e2m1s3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Dear Maintainer, During a rebuild of the package for Bullseye, it is seen that the package fails to build. The build failure snippet is below. It is also noticed that the same

Bug#981847: ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII

2021-02-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: ruby-power-assert Version: 1.1.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Dear Maintainer, During a rebuild of the package on Bullseye, the package fails in one of the tests. Below is the failure snippet. The same is also seen in the Reproducible Builds

Bug#981846: python-argcomplete: multiple tests failure

2021-02-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: python-argcomplete Version: 1.8.1-1.3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Dear Maintainer, During a rebuild of the package on Bullseye, multiple tests in the package fail. A snippet of the failure is below. The same build failure logs are also seen in

Bug#981842: acpica-unix: multiple definition of `AslCompilerlval'

2021-02-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: acpica-unix Version: 20190509-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, During a rebuild of the package on Debian Bullseye, the package fails to build. A snippet of the build failure is below. The same

Bug#981720: FTBFS: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/resolv.conf'

2021-02-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
e issue along with the full build log. https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bullseye/amd64/python-eventlet.html -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#955095: cyrus-sasl2: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: Extension error: Could not import extension sphinxlocal.builders.manpage

2021-02-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: cyrus-sasl2 Version: 2.1.27+dfsg-2 Followup-For: Bug #955095 Hi, We've hit this build failure when re-building the package in our downstream. As it stands now, this issue is also seen on the Reproducible Builds. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable

Bug#981720: FTBFS: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/resolv.conf'

2021-02-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: python-eventlet Version: 0.26.1-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source The package fails to build because of a failing test, which seeks the `/etc/resolv.conf` file to be present, which may not be the case always. The same build failure is also seen in

Bug#981718: haskell-basement: ftbfs probably in document generation

2021-02-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: haskell-basement Version: 0.0.11-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The package fails to build in Bullseye. The same is also reflected in the Reproducible build status Incomplete build failure snippet ```

Bug#981717: command-not-found: test 'multi advise debs' broken

2021-02-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: command-not-found Version: 20.10.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source The package reportedly fails in one of the tests. The failing test log snippet is below: ``` FAIL: test_from_table

Bug#958610: open-iscsi: Build-Depends on deprecated dh-systemd which is going away

2020-11-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ould be as > simple as > > replacing the build dependency on dh-systemd with a build dependency > on > > debhelper (>= 9.20160709). -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#958592: open-isns: Build-Depends on deprecated dh-systemd which is going away

2020-11-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
le as > > replacing the build dependency on dh-systemd with a build dependency > on > > debhelper (>= 9.20160709). -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#971389: seascope: Dependency to 'python3-pyqt5.qtsvg' missing, does not start

2020-09-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
e packaging repo. It'll soon be uploaded to Debian Unstable. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#970493: src:laptop-mode-tools: fails to migrate to testing for too long: maintainer built arch:all binaries

2020-09-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure > doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I > will > shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing > this > bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload. > > Paul &

Bug#961588: closing 961588

2020-06-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
close 961588 thanks -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."

Bug#955346: marked as pending in rabbitvcs

2020-03-31 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #955346 in rabbitvcs reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#938327: Upstream references

2020-03-25 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
this is fixed in 0.18, could you please update the package? rabbitcvs > is among > > the last handful of packages blocking the pygtk removal at this > point. Hi Mortiz, Yes. I should be able to get this complete soon. Hopefully by this week. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.deb

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-03-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
t to get away from it. My wild guess is is that it must have been done so for ABI checks; something that I never cared for since I took up the maintenance. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#952506: Re: Bug#952506: Re: Bug#952506: Wired interface name maybe changed when reboot

2020-02-26 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
siness > > laptop-mode-tools has with your network interfaces. > > > > I'm going to reassign this bug report to laptop-mode-tools and > > bumping > > the severity to RC. > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-02-24 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Sorry. I hadn't realized that you already had MRs on Salsa. But I wasn't aware of the extra configuration needed for notifications. Please go ahead with the upload. Thanks, Ritesh On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 15:16 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hi Santiago, > > Do you have the

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-02-24 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
it merged and get done with this bug report ? Thanks, Ritesh On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 13:33 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hi Santiago, > > On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 15:46 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > BTW, I will prepare a git branch in my personal salsa namespace. > > But > >

Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1

2020-02-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ster. You can prepare your changes against that branch. https://salsa.debian.org/uml-team/user-mode-linux/tree/buster -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#938962: [PATCH] um: Add back support for extra userspace libraries

2019-10-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
s/extra-libs.sh > + > ${CC} ${CFLAGS_vmlinux} \ > -o ${output}\ > -Wl,-T,${lds} \ > ${objects} \ > - -lutil -lr

Bug#938962: Bug#941720: linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 depends on linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-common=4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1 but only linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64=4.19.67-2~bpo9+1 is avail

2019-10-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
> > user-mode-linux: linux-source-4.19 > > > > Is user-mode-linux maintained? This seems to come up somewhat > > regularly. It is maintained. It is just that the latest upload is blocked by DBug: #938962 -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian

Bug#938962: user-mode-linux needs update for new linux

2019-09-12 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
`pcap_open` which is also declared in linux headers in arch/um/drivers/pcap_user.c Thanks, Ritesh On Sat, 2019-09-07 at 17:18 +0200, Romain Francoise wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:21 PM Ritesh Raj Sarraf > wrote: > [...] > > In file included from /

Bug#938962: user-mode-linux needs update for new linux

2019-09-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ng. I am inclined to reassign this bug to libpcap but I think I don't have more details of what is causing the failure. Can anyone help here ? -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#932307: multipath-tools does not update wwids file

2019-07-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
> The exact same machine works just fine on Debian 9 Stretch (with zfs- > dkms). > A upgrade to Buster, with untouched /etc/multipath.conf works just > fine also. You mean the same old configuration file from Stretch works fine on Buster ? -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#927122: ruby2.5: Rinda::TestRingFinger test_make_socket_ipv4_multicast Errno::ENETUNREACH: Network is unreachable

2019-04-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: ruby2.5 Version: 2.5.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The current ruby2.5 package in Buster/Unstable fails to build from scratch. It fails in some of the tests that depend on network availability. The

Bug#924860: multipath-tools: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected

2019-03-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
tances > from > Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. > Every > failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. Thank you for your work on the archive rebuilds. They are very very useful in retaining the quality of the packages. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#924692: apport: /var/crash/.lock created insecurely

2019-03-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 19:57 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 22:39 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > Apport tries to create /var/crash/.lock if doesn't exist already. > > But > > /var/crash/ is world-writable, so a malicious local user could do: > >

Bug#924693: apport: /var/crash/.lock is world-writable

2019-03-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
try: -fd = os.open(lockfile, os.O_WRONLY | os.O_CREAT | os.O_NOFOLLOW) +fd = os.open(lockfile, os.O_WRONLY | os.O_CREAT | os.O_NOFOLLOW, 0o644) except OSError as e: error_log('cannot create lock file (uid %i): %s' % (os.getuid(), str(e))) sys.exit(1) 20:0

Bug#924692: apport: /var/crash/.lock created insecurely

2019-03-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
g the lock file. Yes. /var/crash/ is world writable and has the sticky bit set. It is needed so that normal (unprivileged) user processes also write down their crash reports without seeking root privileges. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating S

Bug#923930: FTBFS: FAIL test_chain (exit status: 1)

2019-03-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: heimdal Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) heimdal fails to build from source, both in Buster and Sid. It is failing in one of the tests. Relevant snippet below and full build log is accessible at:

Bug#854743: golang-github-mailru-easyjson: FTBFS (32-bit): constant 4294967295 overflows int

2019-03-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: src:golang-github-mailru-easyjson Followup-For: Bug #854743 Attached patch fixed the problem. Please consider it for Buster -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64

Bug#922369: javamail: FTBFS on Buster/Sid

2019-02-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: javamail Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source You can also see the same build failure from the reproducible builds projects efforts. https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/javamail.html [ 254s] Generating

Bug#888130: ruby-net-http-persistent: FTBFS on ruby2.5: ssl verification fails

2019-01-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: src:ruby-net-http-persistent Followup-For: Bug #888130 The one uploaded recently into experimental has built successfully. Can the maintainer please upload it to Unstable so that it does get included in Buster ? -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing

Bug#915995: nfs-utils FTBFS with glibc 2.28

2019-01-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
. (Closes: #915995) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:33:27 +0530 + nfs-utils (1:1.3.4-2.3) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru nfs-utils-1.3.4/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-undefined-major.patch nfs-utils-1.3.4/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-undefined-major.patch

Bug#919399: FTBFS: undefined reference to makedev

2019-01-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: cowdancer Version: 0.87 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1317036836604284426==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf To: Debian Bug Track

Bug#913609: bpfcc FTBFS on amd64: No such file or directory: 'bcc-0.7.0'

2018-11-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
load with `--no-parallel` but I would like to test that before. Is there a way to do that ? -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#913609: bpfcc FTBFS on amd64: No such file or directory: 'bcc-0.7.0'

2018-11-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
uch file or directory: 'bcc-0.7.0' > make[3]: Leaving directory '/build/1st/bpfcc-0.7.0/obj-x86_64-linux- > gnu' > make[3]: *** [src/python/CMakeFiles/bcc_py_python3.dir/build.make:71: > src/python/dist-python2/bcc-0.7.0.tar.gz] Error 1 -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org

Bug#909926: multipath-tools: multipath segfaults regularily

2018-10-22 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
haven't encountered the bug (yet) myself nor have I had any reports. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#909926: multipath-tools: multipath segfaults regularily

2018-10-22 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
s to be investigated. I was recently updating my own virtual multipath san setup to the latest (0.7.7-3) and did not face any issues. I will try to spare some time for this bug but meanwhile if you have any additional input/updates, please do update this bug report. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http:/

Bug#899771: closing 899771

2018-10-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
close 899771 thanks -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."

Bug#908733: redshift: Unable to run, unable to connect to geoclue, unable to get location from provider, free desktop access denied geolocation. disalbed for uid 1000

2018-09-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Please fix your geoclue2 setup. Custom configs for redshift work perfect and so does properly set geoclue2 setup. s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 15:09 Ervin wrote: > Package: redshift > Version: 1.11-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable >

Bug#908160: FTBFS: build from source fails with undefined reference to `minor'

2018-09-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
x2x.c:754: undefined reference to > `minor' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > This is reported to Ubuntu in bug 1791154 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791154 > -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating

Bug#906974: bpfcc: FTBFS in buster/sid

2018-08-24 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
pfcc upstream had a much lower version of LLVM supported. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#905729: laptop-mode-tools causes `sda` disk to stop indefinitely when disconnect AC power.

2018-08-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
th 4.17, because the multiqueue setting was enabled by default with this version. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#891180: efibootmgr: grub uefi fails to boot

2018-08-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
unately, I cannot verify these steps. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#905338: snapper-gui: Namespace GtkSource not available

2018-08-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
re---end--->8--- > > Installing gir1.2-gtksource-3.0 fixes this. Ideally this should have come from `python3:Depends`. But, for now, I've explicitly added the dependency. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#902810: user-mode-linux: FTBFS in stretch (Hunk #1 FAILED in 07-remove-rpath.patch)

2018-07-02 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
the weekend. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#892995: systemtap: failes to compile scripts, implicit declaration of some functions

2018-06-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
sense to patch stapbpf/Makefile.am to get rid > of > install-exec-hook, and add a dpkg-statoverride call to > systemtap-runtime.postinst for the stapbpf binary? Sorry for the late follow-up. I have made changes based on your suggestion. An upload to the archive will follow soon. Thanks

Bug#784524: [robojournal] Qt4's WebKit removal

2018-06-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ll keep monitoring it. I've filed a remove request for robojournal. Upstream has been inactive for years and it is a dead project now. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901447 -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#892995: systemtap: failes to compile scripts, implicit declaration of some functions

2018-03-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
stapusr:x:156: root@priyasi:/# On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 17:33 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I am trying to package version 3.2 for Debian. But I have run into > some > build failures. > > > make[6]: Leaving directory '/build/systemtap-3.2/staprun' > make install-exec-hoo

Bug#892995: systemtap: failes to compile scripts, implicit declaration of some functions

2018-03-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
6_64) > > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > > [...] > > Due to the absence of a fixed kernel API, newer systemtap versions > are > required to deal with newer kernels. The particular errors listed > here hav

Bug#873240: Processed: your mail

2018-02-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
cations works fine. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#889544: Bug

2018-02-11 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Thanks for the reply. This was an issue that crept in in 1.72-1 and was quickly resolved with 1.72-2. s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On 11-Feb-2018 14:24, "Jean-Marie Favreau" wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > When the laptop-mode was activated, I was getting in

Bug#889544: Bug

2018-02-10 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
No. That version should have the issue resolved. You may have a different issue altogether. Please share system logs. s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On 11-Feb-2018 03:36, "Jean-Marie Favreau" wrote: > Dear laptop-mode-tools maintainer, > > On my system the bug

Bug#888971: /usr/bin/linux.uml: random segfault in uml mm

2018-01-31 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: user-mode-linux Version: 4.14-1um-2 Severity: grave File: /usr/bin/linux.uml Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Random segfault is seen with latest uml. Needs investigation. Let's not let this propagate to testing. [ OK ] Started Getty on tty1. [ OK ] Reached

Bug#885556: multipath-udeb: depends on a non-udeb package: liburcu6

2018-01-19 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
I'll only be able to be at my computer next week. So you may go ahead with the binnmu. Thanks s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On 17-Jan-2018 22:09, "Cyril Brulebois" wrote: > Hi, > > Michael Jeanson (2018-01-15): > > I've uploaded 0.10.0-3 with the

Bug#878935: Unsatisfiable dependencies on !amd64

2017-10-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/bpfcc.git/commit/?id= > f73049e48fd98dd01d4475f88f6b490e6a1b34bb > [2] https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/linux > [3] https://packages.ubuntu.com/artful/linux-image-generic > [4] https://packages.ubuntu.com/artful/linux-headers-generic >

Bug#878922: libbpfcc-dev does not depend on libbpfcc

2017-10-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello, Thanks for the bug report. On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 19:31 +0200, Alexander Kurtz wrote: > Please fix this by making libbpfcc-dev depend on libbpfcc. After installing the libbpfcc package manually, does it build proper ? -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Deb

Bug#853348: clementine: ftbfs with GCC-7

2017-10-12 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: src:clementine Followup-For: Bug #853348 Dear Thomas, Please find attached a patch to fix FTBFS with GCC 7. And regarding #874295, I think the bug is overrated. But if that conflicts policy, can we please move the package to contrib ? -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid

Bug#874295: clementine: installs non-free plugin at runtime

2017-10-11 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: clementine Version: 1.3.1+git276-g3485bbe43+dfsg-1 Followup-For: Bug #874295 Clementine has been removed from Debian testing. Can the package maintainer please comment on if there is a fix ? THe patch that Jonas has mentioned should be good enough to get this bug resolved. BTW Jonas,

Bug#877925: bpfcc-tools: Missing kernel dependency

2017-10-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
a dependency to kernel headers Thank you for the bug report. I've fixed it in the dev repo and it'll be part of the next upload, after I fix the other RC bug, 873322. If you have some time and can assist on the mentioned bug, that'd be appreciated. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj S

Bug#877459: Bug#876337: systemtap fails to compile simple examples on linux 4.12

2017-10-02 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 21:00 +0545, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 08:39 +0100, Stephan Dollberg wrote: > > Let me know whether you need any more info. > > The latest git snapshot I picked from today, fails to build in the > eBPF > module. I fixed that but r

Bug#876683: apport: FTBFS: Could not determine system package manager. Copy appropriate backends/packaging* to apport/packaging_impl.py

2017-09-27 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 23:18 +0545, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 19:20 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > This detection method looks very fragile. > > The rpm package in Debian provides /usr/bin/rpm, probably something > > similar could exist for dp

Bug#876683: apport: FTBFS: Could not determine system package manager. Copy appropriate backends/packaging* to apport/packaging_impl.py

2017-09-25 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Agreed. Never spent much time on apport. When I started work on it initially, I was hopeful there'll be more momentum in Debian and many more people will use it (and chime in). But since the very beginning, it has been in Experimental only. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rr

  1   2   3   4   >