Bug#1064086: marked as pending in ocamlnet

2024-03-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1064086 in ocamlnet reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1064086: Acknowledgement (/usr/share/doc/libapache2-mod-netcgi-apache/changelog.gz: libapache2-mod-netcgi-apache break apache)

2024-03-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Le 17/02/2024 à 05:09, Frédéric Loyer a écrit : We can fix it changing the /etc/apache2/mods-available/netcgi_apache.load Simply changing the first line LoadModule netcgi_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_netcgi_apache.so (netcgi_module instead of netcgi_apache_module) Indeed.

Bug#1052232: marked as pending in mlpost

2023-10-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1052232 in mlpost reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1052230: marked as pending in ocamlnet

2023-09-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1052230 in ocamlnet reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1052230: FTBFS with OCaml 4.14.1

2023-09-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: reassign -1 src:ocamlnet Control: retitle -1 "Missing build-dependency on pkg-config" Control: affects -1 src:caml-crush Le 20/09/2023 à 10:19, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : The failure seems to be unrelated to OCaml 4.14.1, as the failure is reproducible in current unstable

Bug#1052035: ulex0.8: FTBFS: Error: This expression has type char Stream.t -> (MLast.str_item * MLast.loc) list * Pcaml.status but an expression was expected of type 'a ref

2023-09-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Le 16/09/2023 à 12:54, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : Source: ulex0.8 Version: 1.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org [...] See https://bugs.debian.org/1051377 Cheers, --

Bug#1051485: marked as pending in frama-c

2023-09-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1051485 in frama-c reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1051484: marked as pending in dose3

2023-09-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1051484 in dose3 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1051475: marked as pending in ledit

2023-09-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1051475 in ledit reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1051475: ledit: can't be built with arch:all+any

2023-09-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 08/09/2023 à 15:53, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : Hello, for some reasons, building ledit with arch:all + arch:any produces a ledit binary with an additional dependency on libstdlib-ocaml-lqmb5 This makes the arch:all package not binNMU safe, and then RC buggy. I think, for an arch:all

Bug#1004477: marked as pending in virt-top

2023-09-03 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1004477 in virt-top reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1050027: blocking migration of other OCaml packages to testing

2023-08-22 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear Julien, Le 19/08/2023 à 20:58, Helmut Grohne a écrit : Control: reopen -1 Control: found -1 mathcomp-analysis/0.6.4-2 On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 05:33:11PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Julien Puydt ). I'm sorry. Adding

Bug#1050027: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Julien Puydt ) (Bug#1050027: fixed in mathcomp-analysis 0.6.4-2)

2023-08-22 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 19/08/2023 à 21:25, julien.pu...@gmail.com a écrit : I'm sorry. Adding Breaks is necessary but insufficient. You also need Replaces. What is in libcoq-mathcomp-analysis << 0.6.4 is now in two packages: - libcoq-mathcomp-classical (a small part) ; - libcoq-mathcomp-analysis (the most part --

Bug#1049958: marked as pending in coccinelle

2023-08-17 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1049958 in coccinelle reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1000004: pcre-ocaml: depends on obsolete pcre3 library

2023-08-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Status update : I've started migrating reverse-dependencies to use the pure-OCaml re library, which has a (imperfect) compatibility layer. However, camlp5's upstream has expressed reluctance [1] to this move. [1] https://github.com/camlp5/camlp5/issues/101#issuecomment-1678163219 >

Bug#1043427: src:utop: fails to migrate to testing for too long: blocked by ocaml-logs rebuild

2023-08-11 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 11/08/2023 à 20:53, Paul Gevers a écrit : One current blocker is xmlrpc-light, which I mistakenly uploaded with urgency low 2 days ago, which therefore should not migrate before 8 days from now. It seems the connection is hidden. It would be nice if you could show how that works. Look

Bug#1043427: src:utop: fails to migrate to testing for too long: blocked by ocaml-logs rebuild

2023-08-11 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear Paul, On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:44:23 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: [...]¨ Your package src:utop has been trying to migrate for 37 days [2]. [...] > If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. One

Bug#1042749: marked as pending in utop

2023-08-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1042749 in utop reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1042751: marked as pending in utop

2023-08-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1042751 in utop reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1042501: Depends on obsolete pcre

2023-07-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Source: ocsigenserver Severity: serious Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, ocsigenserver depends on obsolete libpcre-ocaml-dev. Please move away to another regexp library. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990,

Bug#1042499: Depends on obsolete pcre

2023-07-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Source: ocaml-duppy Severity: serious Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, ocaml-duppy depends on obsolete libpcre-ocaml-dev. Please move away to another regexp library. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'),

Bug#1037757: llvm-toolchain-13: ftbfs with GCC-13

2023-07-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Le 29/07/2023 à 08:57, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : Therefore, I am going to submit a NMU forcing usage of g++-12. It FTBFS with an error about missing asm/errno.h (among others). Exporting CPATH=/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu, the build goes a bit further, but fails at linking libomp.so.5

Bug#1037757: llvm-toolchain-13: ftbfs with GCC-13

2023-07-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:27:51 + Matthias Klose wrote: Package: src:llvm-toolchain-13 Version: 1:13.0.1-11 Severity: normal Tags: sid trixie User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-13 [...] The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with gcc-13/g++-13, but

Bug#1041789: RM: unison-2.51+4.13.1 -- RoQA; newer version packaged

2023-07-28 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Le 23/07/2023 à 18:49, Bastian Germann a écrit : Source: unison-2.51+4.13.1 Version: 2.51.5-1 Severity: serious Why is unison-2.51+4.13.1 not removed yet when unison-2.52 is available? It is OK to remove unison-2.51+4.13.1 from unstable now. Note that I

Bug#1041758: marked as pending in cudf

2023-07-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1041758 in cudf reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1041033: marked as pending in ocaml-dssi

2023-07-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1041033 in ocaml-dssi reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1041032: marked as pending in ocaml-gstreamer

2023-07-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1041032 in ocaml-gstreamer reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1041025: marked as pending in ocaml-res

2023-07-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1041025 in ocaml-res reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1041031: marked as pending in ocaml-bjack

2023-07-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1041031 in ocaml-bjack reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1041018: marked as pending in facile

2023-07-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1041018 in facile reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1041002: marked as pending in easy-format

2023-07-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1041002 in easy-format reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1041001: marked as pending in cryptokit

2023-07-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1041001 in cryptokit reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1041000: marked as pending in cppo

2023-07-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1041000 in cppo reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1040999: marked as pending in camlimages

2023-07-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1040999 in camlimages reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1040874: marked as pending in jbuilder

2023-07-13 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1040874 in jbuilder reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1034938: marked as pending in ocsigenserver

2023-05-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1034938 in ocsigenserver reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1034938: libocsigenserver-ocaml: missing Breaks+Replaces for libocsigenserver-ocaml-dev when upgrading from bullseye

2023-05-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Le 27/04/2023 à 14:59, Helmut Grohne a écrit : Attempting to unpack libocsigenserver-ocaml/5.0.1-1+b12 from Debian bookworm on a minimal Debian bullseye with libocsigenserver-ocaml-dev/2.16.1-1+b3 installed, causes an unpack error from dpkg due to

Bug#1032257: alt-ergo free and non-free

2023-03-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear Jean-Christophe, Le 02/03/2023 à 13:08, Jean-Christophe Léchenet a écrit : We were surprised to see that the last version of alt-ergo (2.4.2) is in Debian testing, while it is non-free. At the moment, the latest free version is 2.3.0. Is there some mechanism to extract the free subset of

Bug#1032257: Non-free (non-commercial) license

2023-03-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Source: alt-ergo Version: 2.4.2-2 Severity: serious Dear Maintainers, It has been brought to my attention [1] that the version of alt-ergo currently in testing has a non-free license [2]. According to [3], the latest free version is Alt-Ergo-Free version 2.3.3, which is the version which should

Bug#1002940: marked as pending in otags

2023-02-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1002940 in otags reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#971176: marked as pending in ocaml-reins

2023-02-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #971176 in ocaml-reins reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1030622: tex-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2023-02-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, Le 05/02/2023 à 20:52, Hilmar Preuße a écrit : Today the new texlive-base & texlive-extra did migrate to testing and hence were upgraded on your system. The texlive-lang did not migrate yet, this will happen soon. Once texlive-lang-japanese is upgraded, please repeat the test. Is suspect

Bug#1030622: tex-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2023-02-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: tex-common Version: 6.18 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, I got this when upgrading texlive today in testing: > Paramétrage de tex-common (6.18) ... > Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. > Running mtxrun --generate. This may take some time... done. > Running updmap-sys.

Bug#1030401: Many bugs about unsatisfiable build-dependencies

2023-02-04 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, These unsatisfiable build-dependencies are temporary and will be solved by properly sequenced binNMUs or sourceful uploads that I am currently dealing with. I do not see the value of such bug reports. Packages with unsatisfiable build-dependencies do not migrate to testing nor are

Bug#1028324: RM: cduce -- RoQA, unmaintained, FTBFS, zero popcon

2023-01-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Le 09/01/2023 à 16:37, Tobias Frost a écrit : This makes me wonder if we should retire this package. Yes, absolutely. If you also think that it shoulw be removed, just reassign it to the ftp.debian.org pseudo package. Cheers, -- Stéphane

Bug#1028370: Connection to server failed

2023-01-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 10/01/2023 à 07:56, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : Today, cssh does not work: $ cssh a b c d Connection to server failed -- (version 11.0) Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified at /usr/share/perl5/App/ClusterSSH/Window/Tk.pm line 57. I'm pretty sure it was working 3

Bug#1028370: Connection to server failed

2023-01-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: clusterssh Version: 4.16-4 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, Today, cssh does not work: $ cssh a b c d Connection to server failed -- (version 11.0) Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified at /usr/share/perl5/App/ClusterSSH/Window/Tk.pm line 57. I'm pretty sure

Bug#991060: reopen for bullseye

2022-12-04 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Le 04/12/2022 à 20:51, Santiago Vila a écrit : Please, let us fix this for stable. I would gladly backport the fix from unstable but since the fix was included in a new upstream release I'm in doubt about what would have to be done and would definitely need help. Did you try the

Bug#1008080: Some sites do not work

2022-03-22 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: chromium Version: 99.0.4844.74-1 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, On two different, up-to-date Debian testing machines, at least the following sites: https://framatalk.org https://replit.com do not work properly (but not all sites are broken). I get spurious "Your connection was

Bug#1005658: unison-2.51+4.11.1: FTBFS: detects changes in debian/control

2022-02-13 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 13/02/2022 à 13:50, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Source: unison-2.51+4.11.1 > Version: 2.51.3-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > [...] Unison binary protocol depends on OCaml version (for the moment; this will probably change in the next version), hence this failure. The

Bug#1004748: guestfs-tools ftbfs with new ocaml

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 16:23:47 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:guestfs-tools > Version: 1.46.1-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bookworm > > guestfs-tools ftbfs with new ocaml > > [...] > Use the equivalent signed form: +C+D+E+F+L+M+P+S+U+V+Y+Z+X+52-3. > Hint: Enabling or disabling a

Bug#1004477: virt-top fails to start with OCaml 4.13.1

2022-01-28 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 28/01/2022 à 13:10, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > Package: virt-top > Version: 1.0.9-1.1 > Severity: serious > X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers > > $ virt-top > the file '/usr/bin/virt-top' has not the right magic number: expected > Caml1999X030, got Caml1999X028 /usr/bin/virt-top is a

Bug#1002657: FTBFS with OCaml 4.13.1

2022-01-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tags -1 + patch Le 26/12/2021 à 21:04, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > Your package FTBFS with OCaml 4.13.1 with the following error: >> File "mList.ml", line 203, characters 14-23: >> 203 | let slist = List.sort compare list in >> ^^

Bug#1002984: marked as pending in mlpost

2022-01-21 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1002984 in mlpost reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1002677: v2.0.2 fails to compile

2022-01-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 10/01/2022 à 09:21, Kyle Robbertze a écrit : >>> The fix for this is to package liquidsoap v2. I have got some work on >>> that in the git repo, however it is failing to detect camomile and I >>> don't know enough of the ocaml via make build system to debug it. I >>> think this may be an

Bug#1002677: v2.0.2 fails to compile

2022-01-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear Kyle, Le 10/01/2022 à 08:56, Kyle Robbertze a écrit : > The fix for this is to package liquidsoap v2. I have got some work on > that in the git repo, however it is failing to detect camomile and I > don't know enough of the ocaml via make build system to debug it. I > think this may be an

Bug#973181: marked as pending in camljava

2022-01-03 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #973181 in camljava reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1002677: FTBFS in unstable

2021-12-26 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Source: liquidsoap Version: 1.4.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS in unstable with the following error: > File "tools/ffmpeg_config.ml", line 38, characters 9-36: > 38 | FFmpeg.Avutil.Log.set_level verbosity; >

Bug#1002498: FTBFS with ocamlgraph 2.0.0

2021-12-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 1002498 + pending thanks Le 23/12/2021 à 11:52, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > I've tried fixing it, but it looks non-trivial: adding the `empty' > value leads to another error... Well, it turns out that upstream works fine with ocamlgraph 2.0.0... A Debian patch was added to support v

Bug#1002498: marked as pending in dose3

2021-12-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1002498 in dose3 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1002498: FTBFS with ocamlgraph 2.0.0

2021-12-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Source: dose3 Version: 6.0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS with ocamlgraph 2.0.0, recently uploaded to unstable: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dose3=sid Tail of log: > $ (cd _build/default && /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -w -40 -g -bin-annot -I

Bug#1002230: [Help] Ocalm build error (Was: Bug#1002230: pplacer: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: git: not found)

2021-12-22 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Le 22/12/2021 à 09:32, Andreas Tille a écrit : > there is a new build error that is possibly caused by some change in the > ocaml build system (since the source of the pplacer package did not > changed): > >> + ocamlfind ocamlopt -c -annot -w Z -package batteries -package csv -package >>

Bug#1000573: Upstream uninterested

2021-12-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 07:57:09 +0100 Julien Puydt wrote: > after some discussion with upstream, they're not ready to support those > architectures, so we can just drop them. Then, could you have the (old) binaries of unsupported architectures removed from unstable? Cheers, -- Stéphane

Bug#1001258: FTBFS on mips64el

2021-12-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Source: llvm-toolchain-11 Version: 1:11.1.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, llvm-toolchain-11 FTBFS (at least) on mips64el: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-11=sid > [...] > [ 74%] Building CXX object >

Bug#1000983: ocaml-mm FTBFS on !am64/arm64/riscv64

2021-12-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 02/12/2021 à 07:45, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > Source: ocaml-mm > Version: 0.7.2-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ocaml-mm=0.7.2-1 > > ... > Supported external libraries: > - Alsa : true > - AO: true > - Mad : true >

Bug#1000850: FTBFS on armhf and s390x: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

2021-11-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 30/11/2021 à 10:20, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > Source: llvm-toolchain-9 > Version: 1:9.0.1-20 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Dear Maintainer, > > Your package FTBFS on (at least) armhf and s390x: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-to

Bug#1000806: marked as pending in ocaml-opus

2021-11-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1000806 in ocaml-opus reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1000850: FTBFS on armhf and s390x: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

2021-11-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Source: llvm-toolchain-9 Version: 1:9.0.1-20 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS on (at least) armhf and s390x: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-9=sid The failure seems to occur in tests: > [...] > E: Build killed with signal TERM

Bug#1000806: FTBFS on big endian architectures

2021-11-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Source: ocaml-opus Version: 0.1.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, You package FTBFS on big endian architectures, e.g. s390x: > (cd _build/default/src && /usr/bin/s390x-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fPIC -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_REENTRANT >

Bug#978875: marked as pending in ocaml

2021-11-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #978875 in ocaml reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1000505: marked as pending in ocaml-dssi

2021-11-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1000505 in ocaml-dssi reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1000491: FTBFS with Why3 1.4.0

2021-11-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Source: frama-c Version: 20201209+titanium-4.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Frama-c FTBFS with Why3 1.4.0: > [...] > File "src/plugins/wp/Why3Provers.ml", line 31, characters 19-61: > 31 | let config = Why3.Whyconf.load_default_config_if_needed config in >

Bug#1000370: FTBFS (static assertion failed)

2021-11-22 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Source: ocaml-mccs Version: 1.1+11-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, ocaml-mccs FTBFS on all architectures: > [...] > (cd _build/default/src && /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fPIC -I . -DUSEGLPK -g -I /usr/lib/ocaml -I > /usr/lib/ocaml/bytes -I

Bug#991060: Processed: mlpost FTBFS with imagemagick with the #987504 change

2021-07-17 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 991060 - patch thanks Le 16/07/2021 à 21:33, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : > Processing control commands: > >> tag -1 patch > Bug #991060 [src:mlpost] mlpost FTBFS with imagemagick with the #987504 change > Added tag(s) patch. > [...] > + test -d $(HOME)/.magick || mkdir -p

Bug#987458: marked as pending in js-of-ocaml

2021-04-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #987458 in js-of-ocaml reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#987458: libjs-of-ocaml-doc is empty

2021-04-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 25/04/2021 à 12:29, Romain Porte a écrit : > In commit b9b0e260 the documentation is removed in d/rules on purpose, > but the binary package libjs-of-ocaml-docs is not removed from > d/control. This leads to the creation of an empty package. Building libjs-of-ocaml-doc requires ocaml-odoc,

Bug#987460: marked as pending in ocaml-migrate-parsetree

2021-04-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #987460 in ocaml-migrate-parsetree reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#987259: marked as pending in utop

2021-04-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #987259 in utop reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#985286: marked as pending in ocaml-batteries

2021-03-21 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #985286 in ocaml-batteries reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#975894: marked as pending in jbuilder

2020-11-28 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #975894 in jbuilder reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#975894: Issues with dune 2.7.1

2020-11-26 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, After the update to dune 2.7.1 (from 2.7.0) in Debian, many packages started to fail to build and I don't understand why. Let's have a look at ocp-indent, for example: https://bugs.debian.org/975821 It fails with errors like 'Library "findlib" not found' or 'Library "cmdliner" not

Bug#975894: Breaks build of many reverse dependencies

2020-11-26 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: ocaml-dune Version: 2.7.1-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer, It seems the latest ocaml-dune breaks many reverse dependencies, see for example #975821 (ocp-indent). Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990,

Bug#973721: libssreflect-coq: Depends: coq-8.12.0+4.08.1 but it is not installable

2020-11-03 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 03/11/2020 à 22:53, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libssreflect-coq : Depends: coq-8.12.0+4.08.1 but it is not installable > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. Oh. I built the package locally (on Sep 11), but forgot

Bug#973721: marked as pending in ssreflect

2020-11-03 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #973721 in ssreflect reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#972317: FTBFS on ppc64el

2020-10-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:llvm-toolchain-9 Version: 1:9.0.1-14 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS on ppc64el: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-9 The rebuild was triggered by the update of OCaml from 4.08.1 to 4.11.1, but the error looks

Bug#972318: FTBFS on ppc64el

2020-10-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:llvm-toolchain-10 Version: 1:10.0.1-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS on ppc64el: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-10 The rebuild was triggered by the update of OCaml from 4.08.1 to 4.11.1, but the error looks

Bug#972261: FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 (-unsafe-string is not available)

2020-10-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:ocaml-melt Version: 1.4.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package ocaml-melt FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 because -unsafe-string is no longer available. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy:

Bug#972262: FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 (-unsafe-string is not available)

2020-10-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:ocamlviz Version: 1.01-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package ocamlviz FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 because -unsafe-string is no longer available. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990,

Bug#972259: FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 (-unsafe-string is not available)

2020-10-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:galax Version: 1.1-16 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package galax FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 because -unsafe-string is no longer available. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990,

Bug#972258: FTBFS (1 file would be reformatted)

2020-10-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:botch Version: 0.22-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package botch currently FTBFS in sid: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=botch The rebuild was triggered by the update of OCaml from 4.08.1 to 4.11.1, but the error looks independent (I might

Bug#972241: FTBFS on amd64 and i386 (error: guestfs_launch failed)

2020-10-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:libguestfs Version: 1:1.42.0-9 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS on amd64 and i386: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libguestfs=sid The rebuild was triggered by the update of OCaml from 4.08.1 to 4.11.1, but the error looks

Bug#972211: FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 (-unsafe-string is not available)

2020-10-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: src:mldonkey Version: 3.1.7-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, Your package mldonkey FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 because -unsafe-string is no longer available. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy:

Bug#878983: Status of cduce

2020-08-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, I've contacted upstream and they told me that the branch: https://gitlab.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/cduce/cduce/tree/cduce-next works with OCaml 4.10.0 and that a new release may be made soon. Cheers, -- Stéphane

Bug#968560: unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison

2020-08-17 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 968560 + confirmed reassign 968560 unison thanks Le 17/08/2020 à 15:04, frydo bugdeb a écrit : > I don't have unison installed. > Only unison-gtk, unison-2.48 and unison-2.48-gtk > > version for unison-gtk is 2.48.4+3 > and for both unison-2.48 and unison-2.48-gtk is 2.48.4-7 Right. I will

Bug#968560: unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison

2020-08-17 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 17/08/2020 à 14:53, frydo bugdeb a écrit : > I guess I had it at some time, but now it's 2.48.4-7, for which the bug > appeared to me. There is no version 2.48.4-7 for package *unison* (there is for package *unison-2.48*. I am asking the version of package *unison* which is installed on your

Bug#968560: unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison

2020-08-17 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 17/08/2020 à 14:21, frydo bugdeb a écrit : > Using unison though network with ssh, since last update I could not have it > work. > Connection was lost right after I give my password. > > Launching unison from a shell, I could see that it was looking for a file, > unison, that could not be

Bug#957496: Prevent migration of ocaml-{integers,ctypes} to testing

2020-08-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/08/2020 à 18:03, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : >>> These bugs are still on topic and prevent ocaml-{integers,ctypes} from >>> migrating to testing. Could you please fix them? Or have the faulty >>> packages removed from testing. >> >> At the momen

Bug#957496: Prevent migration of ocaml-{integers,ctypes} to testing

2020-08-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/08/2020 à 17:59, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : >> These bugs are still on topic and prevent ocaml-{integers,ctypes} from >> migrating to testing. Could you please fix them? Or have the faulty >> packages removed from testing. > > At the moment, llvm-toolchain-8 is a key

Bug#957496: Prevent migration of ocaml-{integers,ctypes} to testing

2020-08-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/08/2020 à 08:01, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > These bugs are still on topic and prevent ocaml-{integers,ctypes} from > migrating to testing. Could you please fix them? Or have the faulty > packages removed from testing. At the moment, llvm-toolchain-8 is a key package [1], preve

Bug#957496: Please build with llvm-9 (or more recent)

2020-08-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
tags 968497 + patch thanks Le 16/08/2020 à 14:04, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > astra-toolbox is one of the 3 packages (along with qtcreator and > oclgrind) that still depend on llvm-toolchain-8 (which FTBFS on all > architectures, see #957496), and that prevents removing it from

  1   2   3   4   >