Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)

> > > Am 01.01.23 um 15:55 schrieb Uecker, Martin: > > > > One could just relax (or simply remove) the test from bullseye > > or packport the version bookworm. > > I guess that would be applying 0003-relax-failing-unit-test.patch > to the Bu

Bug#1026061: bart: FTBFS randomly in bullseye (failing test)

One could just relax (or simply remove) the test from bullseye or packport the version bookworm. The wine code is broken (it violates the effective types rules of ISO C). Martin Am Sonntag, dem 01.01.2023 um 15:39 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Übelacker: > Dear Maintainer, > I could reproduce this

Bug#1010164: fails autopkgtest against Octave 7

On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:23:25 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?= wrote: > Package: octave-bart > Version: 0.7.00-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Control: block 1009865 by -1 > > Dear Maintainer, > > The autopkgtest for octave-bart fails against octave 7.1.0-2 recently uploaded > to

Bug#969804: Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:30:20PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > May be I misunderstood you - but if you do not run the test at all > > (as done in some architectures) how will you know whether the test > > might fail?  May be

Bug#969804: Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

Hi Andreas, Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 09:45 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Martin, > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 05:50:34PM +0000, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > > I'm not sure whether this is a good idea in general.  If > > > we can be sure that for s390x there is a

Bug#969804: Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

Am Samstag, den 19.09.2020, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Martin, > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 01:15:47PM +0000, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > > The severity on this bug can be downgraded, however the FTBFS on s390x > > > remains a release critical bug, since s390

Bug#969804: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

Hi Graham, Am Samstag, den 19.09.2020, 14:04 +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 13:51, Uecker, Martin > wrote: > > Could severity be downgraded? > > The severity on this bug can be downgraded, however the FTBFS on s390x > remains a release crit

Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

Could severity be downgraded? (The build on s390x seems to use a newer compiler. The failure may be a compiler bug, but similar to the RISC-V bug I can't investigate as I never got access to porter boxes.) On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:05:16 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 normal >  >

Bug#897466: bart-view: FTBFS: multind.h:17:10: fatal error: misc/nested.h: No such file or directory

Hi Andreas, we will need to re-upload the bart package  to export the missing files. I will prepare a new upload. Best, Martin Am Donnerstag, den 03.05.2018, 12:07 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Martin, > > can you please have a look? > > Kind regards > >  Andreas. > > On Wed, May